ML081580466: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-'CELSIO0 DOCKETED USNRC April 3, 2008 (8:30am)STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF DIVISION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU ANDREW M. CUOMO ATTORNEY GENERAL April 2, 2008 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop -T-3 F23 Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Richard E. Wardwell, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop -T-3 F23 Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 190 Cedar Lane E.Ridgway, CO 81432 Re: License Renewal Application submitted by Entergy Indian Point Unit 2, LLC, Entergy Indian Point Unit 3, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 and Unit 3,*Docket Nos. 50-247-LR/50-286-LR:ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BDO I Dear Administrative Judges: In response to the March 18, 2008 Order of the Licensing Board, enclosed please find joint corrections to the transcripts of the Indian Point oral argument held March 10, 11, and 12, 2008 in White Plains which are submitted on behalf of the State of New York, the State of Connecticut, the County of Westchester, New York, Town of Cortlandt, New York, and Riverkeeper, Inc.Respectfully submitted, s/.s/s/John J. Sipos Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 (518) 402-2251 John.S ipos@oag.state.ny.us Janice A. Dean Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, New York 10271 (212) 416-8459 Janice.Dean@oag.state.ny.us Joan Leary Matthews Senior Attorney for Special Projects New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th floor Albany, New York 12233-5500 (518) 402-9190 jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us
{{#Wiki_filter:DOCKETED USNRC
~/4,~LfJ~
                                                                -'CELSIO0 April 3, 2008 (8:30am)
s~f-:c-The Capitol, Albany, NY 12224 0 (518) 474-8096 S Fax (518) 473-2534 (Not for Service.Qf Papers) 0 http://www.oag.state.ny.us 2 s/s/s/Robert D. Snook, Esq.Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 robert.snook@po.state.ct.us Justin D. Pruyne, Esq.Assistant County Attorney Westchester County Michaelian Office Building 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor White Plains, NY 10601 (914) 995-5102 jdp3@westchestergov.com Daniel Riesel, Esq.Attorney, Town of Cortlandt Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.460 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 421-2150 x 224 driesel@sprlaw.com s/Phillip Musegaas, Esq.Riverkeeper, Inc.828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 (914) 478-4504 phillip@riverkeeper.org cc: Service List UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 2, LLC, ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 3, LLC, and ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.Regdrding the Renewal of Facility Operating Licenses No. DPR-26 and No. DPR-64 for an Additional 20-year Period for INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 & 3.Docket Nos.50-247-LR
OFFICE OF SECRETARY STATE OF NEW YORK RULEMAKINGS AND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL                                 ADJUDICATIONS STAFF ANDREW M. CUOMO                                                                                      DIVISION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE ATTORNEY GENERAL                                                                              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU April 2, 2008 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair                                       Richard E. Wardwell, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board                                Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                              U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop - T-3 F23                                             Mail Stop - T-3 F23 Two White Flint North                                            Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike                                             11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738                                        Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 190 Cedar Lane E.
& 50-286-LR ASLBP No.07-858-03-LR-BDO1 DPR-26, DPR-64 Joint Corrections to Transcripts of Indian Point Oral Argument March 10-12, 2008 White Plains, New York Submitted on Behalf of the State of New York;the State of Connecticut; the County of Westchester, New York;the Town of Cortlandt, New York; and Riverkeeper, Inc.Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Ridgway, CO 81432 Re:       License Renewal Application submitted by Entergy Indian Point Unit 2, LLC, Entergy Indian Point Unit 3, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 and Unit 3,
                *DocketNos. 50-247-LR/50-286-LR:ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BDO I
 
==Dear Administrative Judges:==
 
In response to the March 18, 2008 Order of the Licensing Board, enclosed please find joint corrections to the transcripts of the Indian Point oral argument held March 10, 11, and 12, 2008 in White Plains which are submitted on behalf of the State of New York, the State of Connecticut, the County of Westchester, New York, Town of Cortlandt, New York, and Riverkeeper, Inc.
Respectfully submitted, s/.                                           s/                                   s/
John J. Sipos                                 Janice A. Dean                      Joan Leary Matthews Assistant Attorney General                    Assistant Attorney General           Senior Attorney for Special Projects Office of the Attorney General                Office of the Attorney General       New York State Department The Capitol                                   120 Broadway, 26th Floor                  of Environmental Conservation Albany, NY 12224                             New York, New York 10271            625 Broadway, 14th floor (518) 402-2251                               (212) 416-8459                      Albany, New York 12233-5500 John.S ipos@oag.state.ny.us                   Janice.Dean@oag.state.ny.us         (518) 402-9190 jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us
              ~/4,~LfJ~             s~f-:c-The Capitol, Albany, NY 12224 0 (518) 474-8096 S Fax (518) 473-2534 (Not for Service.Qf Papers) 0 http://www.oag.state.ny.us
 
2 s/                             s/                             s/
Robert D. Snook, Esq.         Justin D. Pruyne, Esq.         Daniel Riesel, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General    Assistant County Attorney      Attorney, Town of Cortlandt Office of the Attorney General Westchester County            Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.
State of Connecticut          Michaelian Office Building    460 Park Avenue 55 Elm Street                  148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor New York, NY 10022 P.O. Box 120                  White Plains, NY 10601        (212) 421-2150 x 224 Hartford, CT 06141-0120        (914) 995-5102                driesel@sprlaw.com robert.snook@po.state.ct.us    jdp3@westchestergov.com s/
Phillip Musegaas, Esq.
Riverkeeper, Inc.
828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 (914) 478-4504 phillip@riverkeeper.org cc: Service List
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 2, LLC,                               Docket Nos.
ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 3, LLC, and                           50-247-LR & 50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
ASLBP No.
07-858-03-LR-BDO1 Regdrding the Renewal of Facility Operating Licenses No. DPR-26 and No. DPR-64 for an Additional 20-year               DPR-26, DPR-64 Period for INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 & 3.
Joint Corrections to Transcripts of Indian Point Oral Argument March 10-12, 2008 White Plains, New York Submitted on Behalf of the State of New York; the State of Connecticut; the County of Westchester, New York; the Town of Cortlandt, New York; and Riverkeeper, Inc.
Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
MARCH 10, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:
MARCH 10, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:
Page/line Correction Chairman McDade Introduction P. 7/1.8 P. 7/1.20 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board[that] then the NRC staff Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Page/line                     Correction Chairman McDade Introduction P. 7/1.8                     Atomic Safety and Licensing Board P. 7/1.20                     [that] then the NRC staff
Page/Line Correction Questions on Westchester County's Petition P. 13 / 1. 21 [AUDIENCE MEMBER] MichaelKaplowitz, Vice-Chair, Westchester County Board of Legislators, P. 13 / 1. 22 [I'm] he's representing me.P. 13 / 1. 25 denied the right to be properly represented
 
[ing].P. 19 / 1. 2 we do have [our] full faith and confidence[.
And] that the State of P. 26 / 1. 8 the staff that [the] 309 Questions on New York State's Petition P.31 /1. 16 [Royceman]
Roisman P.31 /1. 21 [Royceman]
Roisman P. 32 /1.9 [Jody]Jodi P. 32 / 1. 11-13 Janice Dean, who is an Assistant Attorney General [in Cape] and Kit Kennedy, who is in charge of the environmental protection[s]
bureau there P. 34 / 1. 22 [state] spate P. 36 / 1. 7 [in the courts] and reports P. 36 / 1. 12 [ripe] rife P. 40 / 1. 3 contentions P. 42 / 1. 5 or is the [renew] review at P. 45 / 1. 9 Indian Point [Entergy center] Energy Center P. 49 / 1. 1 Is that [tin]P. 53 / 1. 20 under an [sanction]
accession number P. 56 / 1. 18 at[e]
Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Page/Line Correction P. 59 / 1. 13 Commissioners P. 61/1. 6 [at] on their behalf P. 62 / 1. 23 seismic information from [the] circa P. 68 / 1. 24 but it would be in current licensing
Page/Line                     Correction Questions on Westchester County's Petition P. 13 / 1.21                  [AUDIENCE MEMBER]              MichaelKaplowitz, Vice-Chair, Westchester County Board of Legislators, P. 13 / 1.22                  [I'm] he's representing me.
[space] basis P. 69 / 1. 23 is a real possibility of a more significant
P. 13 / 1.25                  denied the right to be properly represented [ing].
[termor] tremor P. 70 / 1. 9 were necessary, it would begin in part 50 [space] basis, P. 70 / 1. 10 current operating
P. 19 / 1.2                  we do have [our] full faith and confidence[. And] that the State of P. 26 / 1. 8                  the staff that [the] 309 Questions on New York State's Petition P.31 /1. 16                  [Royceman] Roisman P.31 /1. 21                  [Royceman] Roisman P. 32 /1.9                    [Jody]Jodi P. 32 / 1. 11-13            Janice Dean, who is an Assistant Attorney General [in Cape] and Kit Kennedy, who is in charge of the environmental protection[s]
[space] basis P. 71 / 1. 2-3 There was a draft [NRC] AEC GDC in 1967. There was a final[NRC] AEC GDC in 1971.P. 71 /1.8 the [NRC] GDC '67 draft?P. 71 / 1. 24 [pushed] published P. 72 /1.8 [COL] CLB P. 73 / 1. 18 were to change, then the [accident]
bureau there P. 34 / 1. 22                [state] spate P. 36 / 1.7                  [in the courts] and reports P. 36 / 1. 12                [ripe] rife P. 40 / 1.3                  contentions P. 42 / 1.5                  or is the [renew] review at P. 45 / 1.9                  Indian Point [Entergy center] Energy Center P. 49 / 1. 1                Is that [tin]
applicant P. 75 / 1. 1 [all].old P. 80 / 1. 14 [let] left P. 81 /1. 6 [seize] cease P. 86 / 1. 17 and am now P. 86 / 1. 25 [muting] meeting P. 91 /1.25 [how] who P. 92 / 1.24 [This] Thus if you suspend the P. 92 /1.25 proceeding would [has] ,as Judge McDade pointed out_P. 93 / 1. 19 summary [deposition]
P. 53 / 1. 20                under an [sanction] accession number P. 56 / 1. 18                at[e]
disposition Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
 
Page/Line Correction P. 93 /1. 22 summary [deposition]
Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
disposition P. 95 / 1. 8 Are we adopting [intention]
Page/Line                   Correction P. 59 / 1. 13                Commissioners P. 61/1. 6                  [at] on their behalf P. 62 / 1.23                 seismic information from [the] circa P. 68 / 1.24                but it would be in current licensing [space] basis P. 69 / 1. 23                is a real possibility of a more significant [termor] tremor P. 70 / 1.9                  were necessary, it would begin in part 50 [space] basis, P. 70 / 1. 10                current operating [space] basis P. 71 / 1.2-3                There was a draft [NRC] AEC GDC in 1967. There was a final
contentions P. 103 / 1. 23 use the word "[intention]
[NRC] AEC GDC in 1971.
contention" P. 106 / 1. 10 [effected]
P. 71 /1.8                  the [NRC] GDC '67 draft?
affected P. 1'07 / 1. 4 [GOC] GDC P. 109 / 1. 10 statement was connected P. 109 / 14 that what there P. 109/ 1. 15 [buy-buy]
P. 71 / 1.24                [pushed] published P. 72 /1.8                  [COL] CLB P. 73 / 1. 18                were to change, then the [accident] applicant P. 75 / 1. 1                [all].old P. 80 / 1. 14                [let] left P. 81 /1. 6                  [seize] cease P. 86 / 1. 17                and am now P. 86 / 1.25                [muting] meeting P. 91 /1.25                  [how] who P. 92 / 1.24                [This] Thus if you suspend the P. 92 /1.25                  proceeding would [has] ,as Judge McDade pointed out_
abide by P. 112 / 1. 21 [GDCB adhere] GDC be adhered P. 116/1. 21 [can], can't attack the current licensing basis P. 117 / 1. 2 part of the staff [at] or Entergy P. 119 / 1. 21 action" and it carries on. ["]P. 120 / 1. 22 (Laughter.)
P. 93 / 1. 19                summary [deposition] disposition
P. 121 /1. 16 Unit [3] 2 P. 124 / 1. 7 further action." P. 129 / 1. 22 [infects]
 
affects P. 130 / 1.3 Unit [3] 2 P. 132 /1. 19 license approved, P. 135 / 1. 10 Unit [3] 2 P. 140 / 1. 17 But it is not that [they're]
Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
there P. 141/1. 1 [2.000] 2,000 P. 141 / 1. 8 I think it's "each nuclear facility" Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Page/Line                     Correction P. 93 /1. 22                  summary [deposition] disposition P. 95 / 1. 8                  Are we adopting [intention] contentions P. 103 / 1. 23                use the word "[intention] contention" P. 106 / 1. 10                [effected] affected P. 1'07 / 1. 4                [GOC] GDC P. 109 / 1. 10                statement was connected P. 109 / 14                  that what there P. 109/ 1. 15                [buy-buy] abide by P. 112 / 1. 21                [GDCB adhere] GDC be adhered P. 116/1. 21                  [can], can't attack the current licensing basis P. 117 / 1. 2                part of the staff [at] or Entergy P. 119 / 1. 21                action" and it carries on. ["]
Page/Line Correction P. 142 / 1. 7 operate [A,] a nuclear P. 142 / 1. 16 and the regulation says to operate "a" nuclear power plant P. 143 /1. 7 [SR. SPEC. AGENT MULLEN] JUDGE WARDWELL P. 148 / 1. 1 that's of importance here P. 150 / 1. 20 It just seems like [there] there's a difference, P. 151 / 1. 19 proposal is strictly the combined power [outages]
P. 120 / 1. 22                (Laughter.)
outputs of P. 152 / 1. 11 contain radioactive[ly]
P. 121 /1. 16                 Unit [3] 2 P. 124 / 1. 7                further action."
contaminants P. 154 / 1. 5 [of curves] occurs P. 154 / 1. 25 It was aerosolized_
P. 129 / 1. 22                [infects] affects P. 130 / 1.3                  Unit [3] 2 P. 132 /1. 19                license approved, P. 135 / 1. 10                Unit [3] 2 P. 140 / 1. 17                But it is not that [they're] there P. 141/1. 1                  [2.000] 2,000 P. 141 / 1. 8                I think it's "each nuclear facility"
P. 156 / 1. 12 hydro-geologically influenced P. 156/1. 18 of this effort [on] in P. 158 /1.23 one of the [A&Ps] AMPs P. 167 /1. 18 tank systems[?].
 
P. 168 /1. 16 applies to[;]P. 168 / 1. 17 [field] fuel oil P. 169 /1. 7 Okay, if I could sort [of] out P. 170 / 1. 23 They specifically
Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
[site] cite P. 171./1. 5 possible: P. 171 / 1. 15 contention, supported P. 171 /1. 25 [application]
Page/Line                     Correction P. 142 / 1. 7                  operate [A,] a nuclear P. 142 / 1. 16                and the regulation says to operate "a" nuclear power plant P. 143 /1. 7                  [SR. SPEC. AGENT MULLEN] JUDGE WARDWELL P. 148 / 1. 1                that's of importance here P. 150 / 1.20                It just seems like [there] there's a difference, P. 151 / 1. 19                proposal is strictly the combined power [outages] outputs of P. 152 / 1. 11                contain radioactive[ly] contaminants P. 154 / 1. 5                  [of curves] occurs P. 154 / 1. 25                It was aerosolized_
declaration P. 177 /1. 3 [Adams] ADAMS P. 189 / 1. 11 And to come to Section [54-29] 54.29 Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
P. 156 / 1. 12                hydro-geologically influenced P. 156/1. 18                  of this effort [on] in P. 158 /1.23                  one of the [A&Ps] AMPs P. 167 /1. 18                tank systems[?].
Page/Line Correction P. 191/1. 11 P. 201/1.3 P. 204 /1.21 P. 208 /L.1 P. 209 / 1.10 P. 209 /. 24 P. 210/1. 18 P. 210/1.24 P. 213 /1. 3 P. 214 /1.24 P. 215/1.9 P.215/1. 23 P. 221/1.4 P. 224 / 1. 13 P. 229 1. 21 P. 229 1. 24 P. 234 /1.3 P. 234 1. 5-6 P. 234 1.9 P. 234 1.24 P. 237 1. 10[2309] 2.309[54.21-A.
P. 168 /1. 16                applies to[;]
1.(i)] 54.21(a)(1)(i)
P. 168 / 1. 17                [field] fuel oil P. 169 /1. 7                  Okay, if I could sort [of] out P. 170 / 1.23                They specifically [site] cite P. 171./1. 5                  possible:
[54.21-A.1.(i)]
P. 171 / 1. 15                contention, supported P. 171 /1. 25                [application] declaration P. 177 /1. 3                  [Adams] ADAMS P. 189 / 1. 11                And to come to Section [54-29] 54.29
54.21(a)(1)(i)
 
Part 54 at page [22.471] 22,471 from Paul [Blanche]
Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Blanch Paul [Blanche's]
Page/Line                    Correction P. 191/1. 11                [2309] 2.309 P. 201/1.3                  [54.21-A. 1.(i)] 54.21(a)(1)(i)
Blanch's Federal Register [22.471] 22,471 Paul [Blanche]
P. 204 /1.21                [54.21-A.1.(i)] 54.21(a)(1)(i)
Blanch[22-477] 22,477 Federal Register [22-471] 22,471 Mr. [Blanche's]
P. 208 /L.1                  Part 54 at page [22.471] 22,471 P. 209 / 1.10                from Paul [Blanche] Blanch P. 209 /. 24                Paul [Blanche's] Blanch's P. 210/1. 18                Federal Register [22.471] 22,471 P. 210/1.24                  Paul [Blanche] Blanch P. 213 /1. 3                 [22-477] 22,477 P. 214 /1.24                Federal Register [22-471] 22,471 P. 215/1.9                  Mr. [Blanche's] Blanch's P.215/1. 23                  Mr. [Blanche] Blanch P. 221/1.4                  putting up a wind farm, of conservation, P. 224 / 1. 13               Clinton was an early site P. 229  1. 21              their replies to [your's] yours P. 229 1. 24                in our Environmental [report] Repor P. 234 /1.3                  Contention Eleven is that [DER] the ER P. 234  1. 5-6              Indian Point [II] 2 and Indian Point [III] 3 P. 234  1.9                [1I] 2 and [III] 3 P. 234  1.24                [conservatism] conservation P. 237 1. 10                Indian Point [II] 2 and Indian Point [III] 3
Blanch's Mr. [Blanche]
 
Blanch putting up a wind farm, of conservation, Clinton was an early site their replies to [your's] yours in our Environmental
Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
[report] Repor Contention Eleven is that [DER] the ER Indian Point [II] 2 and Indian Point [III] 3[1I] 2 and [III] 3[conservatism]
Page/Line                    Correction P. 241 / 1. 24              [C3.IIL] (c)(3)(ii)(L)
conservation Indian Point [II] 2 and Indian Point [III] 3 Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
MARCH 11, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:
Page/Line Correction P. 241 / 1. 24 [C3.IIL] (c)(3)(ii)(L)
P. 253 /1. 4                Cortlandt, [CT] NY P. 254/1.11                  specific [intentions] contentions P. 259/1. 1                  Register [28.481] 28,48 P. 264/1. 13                responsibilities under [CIRCA (phonetic)] CERCLA P. 266 /1.25                threshold. It's [a really fast and] really cast in generic terms.
P. 253 /1. 4 P. 254/1.11 P. 259/1. 1 P. 264/1. 13 P. 266 /1.25 P. 270/1.10 P. 272/1.5 P. 272 /1. 7 P. 273 /1.25 P. 274 / 1.4 P. 274 /1. 5 P. 274/1.7 P. 274 / 1. 14 P. 274 / 1. 22 P. 275/1. 1 P. 27(5/1.8 P. 279 /1. 7 P. 280 /1.20 MARCH 11, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:
P. 270/1.10                  of the Code at any particular power [point] plant P. 272/1.5                  [in] and P. 272 /1. 7                [residents] residences P. 273 /1.25                summary [deposition] disposition stage P. 274 / 1.4                contention, which P. 274 /1. 5                contention that was at issue in Pilgrim P. 274/1.7                  inputs, Judge Lathrop, as you said and [assumption] assumptions P. 274 / 1. 14              And I would just note that to [Entergy] Entergy's P. 274 / 1. 22              "[Date] Data on recovery P. 275/1. 1                  severe reactor accidents."
Cortlandt, [CT] NY specific [intentions]
P. 27(5/1.8                  fortunately a [dire] dearth P. 279 /1. 7                a time because I'm this [hard-scribble] hard-scrabble P. 280 /1.20                saying it could [effect] affect
contentions Register [28.481] 28,48 responsibilities under [CIRCA (phonetic)]
 
CERCLA threshold.
Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
It's [a really fast and] really cast in generic terms.of the Code at any particular power [point] plant[in] and[residents]
Page/Line                     Correction P. 280 /1. 24               might get influenced by that, P. 280 / 1.25                 smaller particles, P. 283 /1.20                 [upper west side] Upper West Side P. 289/1. 12                 same term that the discussion that [State] Staff references P. 289/1. 15                 [Wash] WASH P. 290 /'1. 10               MACCS2 Code, not that they demonstrated P. 292 /1.23                 it's increased clean-up costs P. 302 /1. 15               identified the risk [that's at the] that a fire will disable P. 302 /1. 19               was [no] not evaluated P. 306/1. 15                 information is going to [effect] affect P. 306/1. 17                 controlling [condition] Commission case law P. 306 /1.23                 of SAMA analysis that [is's] it's P. 308/1. 1                 Because again we think it's a P. 308 /1.6                 would materially [effect] affect P. 308 /1. 14               consider this information or you haven't [to] considered P. 308 /1. 17               properly~has [effected] affected P. 309 /1. 17               does this [effect] affect P. 311/1. 17-21             ["In order.to reduce the earthquake risk for IP 1 and to critical conjoin in adjacent Units 2 and 3 is necessary to improve the ability of IP l's critical components to withstand the effects of an earthquake."] "In order to reduce the earthquake risk for IPI (and to the conjoined and adjacent Units 2 and 3), it is necessary to improve the ability of IPl's critical components to withstand the effects of an earthquake."
residences summary [deposition]
 
disposition stage contention, which contention that was at issue in Pilgrim inputs, Judge Lathrop, as you said and [assumption]
Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
assumptions And I would just note that to [Entergy]
Page/Line                    Correction P. 313/1. 6                  [effect] affect P. 313/1.7                    thing, how it's going to [effect] affect P. 316/1. 15                  [siOtuations] situations P. 319/1.17                  Is that correct[>] ?
Entergy's"[Date] Data on recovery severe reactor accidents." fortunately a [dire] dearth a time because I'm this [hard-scribble]
P. 326/1. 3                  system by system P. 327 / 1. 13              been [s] scoped in P. 329 /1.23                  [Sherman] Sherwin P. 330 /1. 17                magnitude events and that's what's then [factor] factored into P. 333 /1. 1                  [MS. SUTTON:] MR. TURK:
hard-scrabble saying it could [effect] affect Text in brackets Page/Line P. 280 /1. 24 P. 280 / 1.25 P. 283 /1.20 P. 289/1. 12 P. 289/1. 15 P. 290 /'1. 10 P. 292 /1.23 P. 302 /1. 15 P. 302 /1. 19 P. 306/1. 15 P. 306/1. 17 P. 306 /1.23 P. 308/1. 1 P. 308 /1.6 P. 308 /1. 14 P. 308 /1. 17 P. 309 /1. 17 P. 311/1. 17-21[]has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
P. 333 /1. 3                 [MR. TURK:] MS. SUTTON:
Correction might get influenced by that, smaller particles,[upper west side] Upper West Side same term that the discussion that [State] Staff references
P. 335/1.5                  But [is] if the dose is P. 336/1.21                  [burroughs] boroughs P. 337/1. 13                into question - - this is an outdated, obsolete [node] model, P. 337/1. 17                 [this] the siting of this plant, that [if] this P. 337/1. 19                what New York is interested in here P. 343 / 1. 14              in here (holding up CFR).
[Wash] WASH MACCS2 Code, not that they demonstrated it's increased clean-up costs identified the risk [that's at the] that a fire will disable was [no] not evaluated information is going to [effect] affect controlling
P. 343 /1. 24                promulgated, I believe it's part [2309] 2.309 P. 344/1.8                  That's our burden under [2309] 2.309.
[condition]
P. 346/1. 12                [NOAA Evaluation] no - evacuation P. 346/1. 19                what the Commission said in McGuire, [CO1217] CLI-217 P. 347 / 1. 15              not [a] at the contention [of] admissibility stage
Commission case law of SAMA analysis that [is's] it's Because again we think it's a would materially
 
[effect] affect consider this information or you haven't [to] considered properly~has
Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
[effected]
Page/Line                    Correction P. 350/1. 16                  [20.13] 2013 P. 350/1. 17                   [20.15] 2015 P. 351 / 1.23                of the regulation that that be [addresses] addressed, P. 354 /1. 7                  [MR. SIPOS:] MR. CHANDLER P. 360 / 1. 15                [MR.] MS. SUTTON:
affected does this [effect] affect["In order.to reduce the earthquake risk for IP 1 and to critical conjoin in adjacent Units 2 and 3 is necessary to improve the ability of IP l's critical components to withstand the effects of an earthquake."] "In order to reduce the earthquake risk for IP I (and to the conjoined and adjacent Units 2 and 3), it is necessary to improve the ability of IPl's critical components to withstand the effects of an earthquake."
P. 362 / 1. 15                Is this the [new reg.] NUREG of P. 362 / 1. 18                I believe it is. The [new reg.]NUREG P. 365 / 1.9                  I would note, however, that the [present] premise of P. 373 / 1.9                  systems, [structure] structures, P. 373 / 1. 10                the scope of 54.21(a) and therefore [is] are subject to P. 374 /1. 4, 11              [Leahy] Lahey P. 374 / 1. 12                declaration [in] and P. 375 /1. 18                [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 376 / 1.5, 25              [Leahy] Lahey P. 376 /1. 7                  [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 376 / 1. 12                [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 377 / 1.13                [Leahy] Lahey P. 378 /1. 1, 17, 20, 23      [Leahy] Lahey P. 379 /1.4, 11              [Leahy] Lahey P. 379 / 1. 16                they have [filed] followed the guidance, P. 379 / 1. 18, 22            [Leahy] Lahey
Text in brackets Page/Line P. 313/1. 6 P. 313/1.7 P. 316/1. 15 P. 319/1.17 P. 326/1. 3 P. 327 / 1. 13 P. 329 /1.23 P. 330 /1. 17 P. 333 /1. 1 P. 333 /1. 3 P. 335/1.5 P. 336/1.21 P. 337/1. 13 P. 337/1. 17 P. 337/1. 19 P. 343 / 1. 14 P. 343 /1. 24 P. 344/1.8 P. 346/1. 12 P. 346/1. 19 P. 347 / 1. 15[]has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
 
Correction
Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
[effect] affect thing, how it's going to [effect] affect[siOtuations]
Page/Line                    Correction P. 380 / 1.6                  with now, then you won't know what [you] you've got as you're P. 380 / 1. 14, 16, 25        [Leahy] Lahey P. 381 / 1.8                  program, and that's Entergy's burden. Our [expect] expert has P. 381 /1. 17                [Leahy] Lahey P. 381 / 1. 18                one paragraph on [pages] page 126 P. 382./1. 1                  down to is a dispute between experts.
situations Is that correct[>]  
P. 382 /1. 17, 19            [Leahy] Lahey P. 383 / 1.6, 14, 22          [Leahy] Lahey P. 383 /1. 19                [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 386 / 1. 10                [werer] were recessed, P. 388 /1.18                  correct when they say that they have [gotten] got in their P. 391 /1. 18, 22            [Leahy] Lahey P. 393 /1.7                  [Leahy] Lahey P. 395 /1. 20                 facilities. It's [giving] given experience and aging.
?system by system been [s] scoped in[Sherman]
P. 401 /1. 7                  contention number [5] 25, P. 401 /1. 14                [Leahy] Lahey P. 402 /1. 3, 9, 14          [Leahy] Lahey P. 403 1. 3, 8, 22            [Leahy] Lahey P. 404 / 1. 5, 22            [Leahy] Lahey P. 404 /1. 25                requirements. But he also discusses the [sharpey] Charp test P. 406 / 1. 17               [Leahy] Lahey
Sherwin magnitude events and that's what's then [factor] factored into[MS. SUTTON:] MR. TURK:[MR. TURK:] MS. SUTTON: But [is] if the dose is[burroughs]
 
boroughs into question --this is an outdated, obsolete [node] model,[this] the siting of this plant, that [if] this what New York is interested in here in here (holding up CFR).promulgated, I believe it's part [2309] 2.309 That's our burden under [2309] 2.309.[NOAA Evaluation]
Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
no -evacuation what the Commission said in McGuire, [CO1217] CLI-217 not [a] at the contention
Page/Line                    Correction P. 406 /1. 25                stainless steel. And even the welds of the [in-course] in-core P. 407 /1. 3                  [Leahy] Lahey P. 407 /1. 6                 these loads can damage the [course] core P. 407 /1. 9, 13, 18          [Leahy] Lahey P. 408 /1. 4, 9, 25          [Leahy] Lahey P. 409 1.4, 10, 15            [Leahy] Lahey P. 409 /. 16                  [serous] serious P. 410 1. 11                  [Leahy] Lahey P. 412 1. 10                  [along] on the same date as its reply.
[of] admissibility stage Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
P. 415 /1. 14                regulation, [5413] 54.13 P. 440 1. 20                  Unit 1 [spend] spent fuel pool P. 441 1.4                    accurate [dada] data P. 441 / 1. 5                was [prepared] repaired P. 452 / 1.24                56 Federal Register [64-967] 64,967, P. 453 / 1.20                doesn't have to be made in the relicense [goes] does not go to the P. 453 / 1.21                mitigation of the environmental impacts [or] of a postulated P. 453 /1.22                  or a severe accident, should it occur P. 454 / 1.7                  [meteorological] radiological emergency preparedness plan for Indian P. 454 / 1.20                under the Part 51 regulations P. 454 / 1.21                appendix [subpart] B to subpart [appendix] A P. 454 / 1. 24                also gets to the heart of* yes, it was studied
Page/Line Correction P. 350/1. 16 [20.13] 2013 P. 350/1. 17 [20.15] 2015 P. 351 / 1. 23 of the regulation that that be [addresses]
 
addressed, P. 354 /1. 7 [MR. SIPOS:] MR. CHANDLER P. 360 / 1. 15 [MR.] MS. SUTTON: P. 362 / 1. 15 Is this the [new reg.] NUREG of P. 362 / 1. 18 I believe it is. The [new reg.]NUREG P. 365 / 1. 9 I would note, however, that the [present]
Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
premise of P. 373 / 1. 9 systems, [structure]
Page/Line "                  Correction P. 455 /1. 15                environmental impacts of a nuclear facility P. 455/1. 17                us has failed to comply with the [updated] updating requirements P. 455 /1.22                the incorporation by reference of the [Wood] Witt report, P. 456 /1.8                  [one is producing] once it sunsets, P. 459 /1.4                  [sound] stated P. 460 /1.2                  [Roni] Rani Franovich in her statement on the 19th of P. 460 /1.7                  to that ten-year obligation [,] we had discussed earlier, P. 460 1. 11                2006, they really "kicked" it off "in earnest." That is P. 469 1.24                 [permanent] permit in effect, P. 472 / 1.3                This is where I would not ask you to do the P. 472  1. 10              And the [DEIS] analysis P. 472 1. 24                Dilks. He has demonstrated [in] with great specificity and P.488/1. 10                  issues means that they have [weighed] waived their legal P. 491 /1.23                as a sovereign state, is at this time unable to [see] cede P. 492 /1.5                  now [that] and New York P. 492 /1. 13                individual [intervenor] intervenors P. 493 / 1. 21              excused. We would then start with [Portland] Cortlandt at 4:00 P. 493 /1.22                 o'clock. Anyway, I believe [Portland] Cortlandt would be next at
structures, P. 373 / 1. 10 the scope of 54.21(a) and therefore
 
[is] are subject to P. 374 /1. 4, 11 [Leahy] Lahey P. 374 / 1. 12 declaration
Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
[in] and P. 375 /1. 18 [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 376 / 1. 5, 25 [Leahy] Lahey P. 376 /1. 7 [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 376 / 1. 12 [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 377 / 1. 13 [Leahy] Lahey P. 378 /1. 1, 17, 20, 23 [Leahy] Lahey P. 379 /1.4, 11 [Leahy] Lahey P. 379 / 1. 16 they have [filed] followed the guidance, P. 379 / 1. 18, 22 [Leahy] Lahey Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Page/Line                    Correction Questions on the Town of Cortlandt's Petition P. 496 / 1. 13                they have been very [obstructive] instructive P. 496 / 1. 16                of our contentions, Technical Contention [and Contention] 2 - on P. 496 / 1.25                and also appear P. 498 / 1. 1                course [of] in and of itself P. 498 / 1.3                 Environmental Impact Statement [proceeds] precedes [and] such P. 500 /1. 2                  report are generally promises to carry out [our] programs as P. 504 / 1. 1                 [trust] thrust of the Sans'oucy affidavit P. 505 /1. 9 - 11            facility; [and] there is a considerable concern that we examine the issues of not licensing this facility [for] or relicensing [its] this facility.
Page/Line Correction P. 380 / 1. 6 with now, then you won't know what [you] you've got as you're P. 380 / 1. 14, 16, 25 [Leahy] Lahey P. 381 / 1.8 program, and that's Entergy's burden. Our [expect] expert has P. 381 /1. 17 [Leahy] Lahey P. 381 / 1. 18 one paragraph on [pages] page 126 P. 382./1. 1 down to is a dispute between experts.P. 382 /1. 17, 19 [Leahy] Lahey P. 383 / 1. 6, 14, 22 [Leahy] Lahey P. 383 /1. 19 [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 386 / 1. 10 [werer] were recessed, P. 388 /1.18 correct when they say that they have [gotten] got in their P. 391 /1. 18, 22 [Leahy] Lahey P. 393 /1.7 [Leahy] Lahey P. 395 /1. 20 facilities.
P. 507 /1. 7                  and indicate[s] that in that instance P. 509 /1. 3                  pool issue, then we would elect to proceed under [23.5] 2.315.
It's [giving] given experience and aging.P. 401 /1. 7 contention number [5] 25, P. 401 /1. 14 [Leahy] Lahey P. 402 /1. 3, 9, 14 [Leahy] Lahey P. 403 1. 3, 8, 22 [Leahy] Lahey P. 404 / 1. 5, 22 [Leahy] Lahey P. 404 /1. 25 requirements.
Questions on the State of Connecticut's Petition P. 510 / 1.3                  [started] stated yesterday P. 510 / 1. 14                [the] Westchester County P. 511 /1. 14                [effect] affect P. 512 / 1. 1                a significant amount P. 512 / 1.3                  [west] east P. 516 / 1.24                [changed] changes P. 520 / 1.23                [for seeding] proceeding P. 522 /1. 22                [SR. SPEC. AGENT MULLEN] JUDGE WARDWELL
But he also discusses the [sharpey]
 
Charp test P. 406 / 1. 17 [Leahy] Lahey Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Page/Line Correction P. 406 /1. 25 stainless steel. And even the welds of the [in-course]
Page/Line                    Correction P. 524 / 1.2                  [2-335] 2.335 MARCH 12, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:
in-core P. 407 /1. 3 [Leahy] Lahey P. 407 /1. 6 these loads can damage the [course] core P. 407 /1. 9, 13, 18 [Leahy] Lahey P. 408 /1. 4, 9, 25 [Leahy] Lahey P. 409 1. 4, 10, 15 [Leahy] Lahey P. 409 /. 16 [serous] serious P. 410 1. 11 [Leahy] Lahey P. 412 1. 10 [along] on the same date as its reply.P. 415 /1. 14 regulation, [5413] 54.13 P. 440 1. 20 Unit 1 [spend] spent fuel pool P. 441 1. 4 accurate [dada] data P. 441 / 1. 5 was [prepared]
Questions on Riverkeeper, Inc.'s Petition P. 529 / 1. 14                [Daronoco] Daronco P. 534 / 1. 16                [Philip] Phillip P. 537 / 1. 1                [and] of P. 537 / 1. 9                admissibility [and]
repaired P. 452 / 1. 24 56 Federal Register [64-967] 64,967, P. 453 / 1. 20 doesn't have to be made in the relicense
P. 537 / 1.20                [simple] simply P. 538 / 1. 13               pool[s]
[goes] does not go to the P. 453 / 1. 21 mitigation of the environmental impacts [or] of a postulated P. 453 /1.22 or a severe accident, should it occur P. 454 / 1. 7 [meteorological]
P. 544 /1.4                  that this was a P. 544 /1.6                  the[y]
radiological emergency preparedness plan for Indian P. 454 / 1. 20 under the Part 51 regulations P. 454 / 1. 21 appendix [subpart]
P. 544 / 1. 11                [this] that P. 544 / 1.22                broaden P. 545 / 1.2                 position that P. 546 / 1.23                [2206] 2.206 P. 550 / 1.8                  [2206] 2.206 P. 552 / 1.4                  [2206] 2.206 P. 557 / 1.4                  [3.206] 2.206 P. 557/ 1. 13                [206] 2.206 P. 557 /1. 16                says P. 568 / 1. 5                unsuc'cessful
B to subpart [appendix]
 
A P. 454 / 1. 24 also gets to the heart yes, it was studied Text in brackets Page/Line
Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
" P. 455 /1. 15 P. 455/1. 17 P. 455 /1.22 P. 456 /1.8 P. 459 /1.4 P. 460 /1.2 P. 460 /1.7 P. 460 1. 11 P. 469 1.24 P. 472 / 1.3 P. 472 1. 10 P. 472 1. 24 P.488/1. 10 P. 491 /1.23 P. 492 /1.5 P. 492 /1. 13 P. 493 / 1. 21 P. 493 /1.22[]has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Page/Line                    Correction P. 568/1. 11                it seems to me for P. 568 /1.24                referenced P. 575 /1. 15                [operated] uprate P. 580/1.6                  [float] flow P. 584/1.9                  CHECWORKS, P. 586/1. 10                [estrangement] entrainment P. 588/1.7                  [MR. TURK] MR. TAFUR P. 589 /1. 12-13            entrainment and impingement P. 589 / 1. 14              entrainment and impingement P. 590 / 1. 13-14            entrainment and impingement P. 590/1. 19                levels [and] of impingement entrainment P. 595 / 1. 14               [FAQ] Fact P. 595 / 1. 17              entrainment and ,impingement P. 595 /1. 20                analysis is, P. 595 / 1. 21              submit it:
Correction environmental impacts of a nuclear facility us has failed to comply with the [updated]
P. 605 /1.23                DEC P. 610/1. 17                [intentionally cause an] intentionally caused P. 610 / 1. 19              intentional P. 611/1. 16                caused attacks P. 612/1.25                  [be] we have to do that P. 612/1. 14                [an amenable] a meaningful
updating requirements the incorporation by reference of the [Wood] Witt report,[one is producing]
 
once it sunsets,[sound] stated[Roni] Rani Franovich in her statement on the 19th of to that ten-year obligation
.Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
[,] we had discussed earlier, 2006, they really "kicked" it off "in earnest." That is[permanent]
Page/Line                    Correction P. 613/1. 16                that's [a] Baltimore P. 615/1. 13                consequences P. 616/1. 19                you[r]
permit in effect, This is where I would not ask you to do the And the [DEIS] analysis Dilks. He has demonstrated
P. 623 / 1.25                says P. 623 /1. 1                [NUREG CR 6295] NUREG/CR-6295 P. 627 / 1.25                [balder] bald or P. 629/1.11                 [difference is] differences P. 640 / 1.25                outlined P. 647 /1.21                [find] fine Capitalization Consistency Note:
[in] with great specificity and issues means that they have [weighed]
If "Applicant," "Agency," and "Commission" are to be capitalized, then so, too, should "State" and "County" be capitalized.
waived their legal as a sovereign state, is at this time unable to [see] cede now [that] and New York individual
Dated:      April 2, 2008
[intervenor]
/////
intervenors excused. We would then start with [Portland]
                                                }}
Cortlandt at 4:00 o'clock. Anyway, I believe [Portland]
Cortlandt would be next at Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Page/Line Correction Questions on the Town of Cortlandt's Petition P. 496 / 1. 13 they have been very [obstructive]
instructive P. 496 / 1. 16 of our contentions, Technical Contention
[and Contention]
2 -on P. 496 / 1. 25 and also appear P. 498 / 1. 1 course [of] in and of itself P. 498 / 1. 3 Environmental Impact Statement
[proceeds]
precedes [and] such P. 500 /1. 2 report are generally promises to carry out [our] programs as P. 504 / 1. 1 [trust] thrust of the Sans'oucy affidavit P. 505 /1. 9 -11 facility;
[and] there is a considerable concern that we examine the issues of not licensing this facility [for] or relicensing
[its] this facility.P. 507 /1. 7 and indicate[s]
that in that instance P. 509 /1. 3 pool issue, then we would elect to proceed under [23.5] 2.315.Questions on the State of Connecticut's Petition P. 510 / 1. 3 [started]
stated yesterday P. 510 / 1. 14 [the] Westchester County P. 511 /1. 14 [effect] affect P. 512 / 1. 1 a significant amount P. 512 / 1.3 [west] east P. 516 / 1. 24 [changed]
changes P. 520 / 1. 23 [for seeding] proceeding P. 522 /1. 22 [SR. SPEC. AGENT MULLEN] JUDGE WARDWELL Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Page/Line Correction P. 524 / 1. 2 [2-335] 2.335 MARCH 12, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:
Questions on Riverkeeper, Inc.'s Petition P. 529 / 1. 14 [Daronoco]
Daronco P. 534 / 1. 16 [Philip] Phillip P. 537 / 1. 1 [and] of P. 537 / 1. 9 admissibility
[and]P. 537 / 1. 20 [simple] simply P. 538 / 1. 13 pool[s]P. 544 /1.4 that this was a P. 544 /1.6 the[y]P. 544 / 1. 11 [this] that P. 544 / 1. 22 broaden P. 545 / 1.2 position that P. 546 / 1.23 [2206] 2.206 P. 550 / 1. 8 [2206] 2.206 P. 552 / 1. 4 [2206] 2.206 P. 557 / 1. 4 [3.206] 2.206 P. 557/ 1. 13 [206] 2.206 P. 557 /1. 16 says P. 568 / 1. 5 unsuc'cessful Text in brackets Page/Line P. 568/1. 11 P. 568 /1.24 P. 575 /1. 15 P. 580/1.6 P. 584/1.9 P. 586/1. 10 P. 588/1.7 P. 589 /1. 12-13 P. 589 / 1. 14 P. 590 / 1. 13-14 P. 590/1. 19 P. 595 / 1. 14 P. 595 / 1. 17 P. 595 /1. 20 P. 595 / 1. 21 P. 605 /1.23 P. 610/1. 17 P. 610 / 1. 19 P. 611/1. 16 P. 612/1.25 P. 612/1. 14[]has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Correction it seems to me for referenced
[operated]
uprate[float] flow CHECWORKS,[estrangement]
entrainment
[MR. TURK] MR. TAFUR entrainment and impingement entrainment and impingement entrainment and impingement levels [and] of impingement entrainment
[FAQ] Fact entrainment and ,impingement analysis is, submit it: DEC[intentionally cause an] intentionally caused intentional caused attacks[be] we have to do that[an amenable]
a meaningful
.Text in brackets Page/Line P. 613/1. 16 P. 615/1. 13 P. 616/1. 19 P. 623 / 1. 25 P. 623 /1. 1 P. 627 / 1.25 P. 629/1.11 P. 640 / 1.25 P. 647 /1.21[]has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.
Correction that's [a] Baltimore consequences you[r]says[NUREG CR 6295] NUREG/CR-6295
[balder] bald or[difference is] differences outlined[find] fine Capitalization Consistency Note: If "Applicant," "Agency," and "Commission" are to be capitalized, then so, too, should "State" and "County" be capitalized.
Dated: April 2, 2008/////-17-}}

Revision as of 15:58, 14 November 2019

2008/04/02-Transmittal of Joint Corrections to the Transcripts of the Indian Point Oral Argument Held March 10, 11, and 12, 2008 on Behalf of State of New York, State of CT, County of Westchester, Ny, Town of Cortlandt, Ny, and Riverkeeper,
ML081580466
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/02/2008
From: Jeremy Dean, Matthews J, Musegaas P, Pruyne J, Riesel D, Sipos J, Snook R
Riverkeeper, Sive, Paget & Riesel, PC, State of CT, Office of the Attorney General, State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation, State of NY, Office of the Attorney General, Town of Cortlandt, NY, Westchester County, NY
To: Lathrop K, Lawrence Mcdade, Richard Wardwell
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS-E-107
Download: ML081580466 (19)
v • d • e


Text

DOCKETED USNRC

-'CELSIO0 April 3, 2008 (8:30am)

OFFICE OF SECRETARY STATE OF NEW YORK RULEMAKINGS AND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ADJUDICATIONS STAFF ANDREW M. CUOMO DIVISION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE ATTORNEY GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU April 2, 2008 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Richard E. Wardwell, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop - T-3 F23 Mail Stop - T-3 F23 Two White Flint North Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 190 Cedar Lane E.

Ridgway, CO 81432 Re: License Renewal Application submitted by Entergy Indian Point Unit 2, LLC, Entergy Indian Point Unit 3, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 and Unit 3,

  • DocketNos. 50-247-LR/50-286-LR:ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BDO I

Dear Administrative Judges:

In response to the March 18, 2008 Order of the Licensing Board, enclosed please find joint corrections to the transcripts of the Indian Point oral argument held March 10, 11, and 12, 2008 in White Plains which are submitted on behalf of the State of New York, the State of Connecticut, the County of Westchester, New York, Town of Cortlandt, New York, and Riverkeeper, Inc.

Respectfully submitted, s/. s/ s/

John J. Sipos Janice A. Dean Joan Leary Matthews Assistant Attorney General Assistant Attorney General Senior Attorney for Special Projects Office of the Attorney General Office of the Attorney General New York State Department The Capitol 120 Broadway, 26th Floor of Environmental Conservation Albany, NY 12224 New York, New York 10271 625 Broadway, 14th floor (518) 402-2251 (212) 416-8459 Albany, New York 12233-5500 John.S ipos@oag.state.ny.us Janice.Dean@oag.state.ny.us (518) 402-9190 jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us

~/4,~LfJ~ s~f-:c-The Capitol, Albany, NY 12224 0 (518) 474-8096 S Fax (518) 473-2534 (Not for Service.Qf Papers) 0 http://www.oag.state.ny.us

2 s/ s/ s/

Robert D. Snook, Esq. Justin D. Pruyne, Esq. Daniel Riesel, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General Assistant County Attorney Attorney, Town of Cortlandt Office of the Attorney General Westchester County Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.

State of Connecticut Michaelian Office Building 460 Park Avenue 55 Elm Street 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor New York, NY 10022 P.O. Box 120 White Plains, NY 10601 (212) 421-2150 x 224 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 (914) 995-5102 driesel@sprlaw.com robert.snook@po.state.ct.us jdp3@westchestergov.com s/

Phillip Musegaas, Esq.

Riverkeeper, Inc.

828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 (914) 478-4504 phillip@riverkeeper.org cc: Service List

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 2, LLC, Docket Nos.

ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 3, LLC, and 50-247-LR & 50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

ASLBP No.

07-858-03-LR-BDO1 Regdrding the Renewal of Facility Operating Licenses No. DPR-26 and No. DPR-64 for an Additional 20-year DPR-26, DPR-64 Period for INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 2 & 3.

Joint Corrections to Transcripts of Indian Point Oral Argument March 10-12, 2008 White Plains, New York Submitted on Behalf of the State of New York; the State of Connecticut; the County of Westchester, New York; the Town of Cortlandt, New York; and Riverkeeper, Inc.

Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

MARCH 10, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:

Page/line Correction Chairman McDade Introduction P. 7/1.8 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board P. 7/1.20 [that] then the NRC staff

Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction Questions on Westchester County's Petition P. 13 / 1.21 [AUDIENCE MEMBER] MichaelKaplowitz, Vice-Chair, Westchester County Board of Legislators, P. 13 / 1.22 [I'm] he's representing me.

P. 13 / 1.25 denied the right to be properly represented [ing].

P. 19 / 1.2 we do have [our] full faith and confidence[. And] that the State of P. 26 / 1. 8 the staff that [the] 309 Questions on New York State's Petition P.31 /1. 16 [Royceman] Roisman P.31 /1. 21 [Royceman] Roisman P. 32 /1.9 [Jody]Jodi P. 32 / 1. 11-13 Janice Dean, who is an Assistant Attorney General [in Cape] and Kit Kennedy, who is in charge of the environmental protection[s]

bureau there P. 34 / 1. 22 [state] spate P. 36 / 1.7 [in the courts] and reports P. 36 / 1. 12 [ripe] rife P. 40 / 1.3 contentions P. 42 / 1.5 or is the [renew] review at P. 45 / 1.9 Indian Point [Entergy center] Energy Center P. 49 / 1. 1 Is that [tin]

P. 53 / 1. 20 under an [sanction] accession number P. 56 / 1. 18 at[e]

Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 59 / 1. 13 Commissioners P. 61/1. 6 [at] on their behalf P. 62 / 1.23 seismic information from [the] circa P. 68 / 1.24 but it would be in current licensing [space] basis P. 69 / 1. 23 is a real possibility of a more significant [termor] tremor P. 70 / 1.9 were necessary, it would begin in part 50 [space] basis, P. 70 / 1. 10 current operating [space] basis P. 71 / 1.2-3 There was a draft [NRC] AEC GDC in 1967. There was a final

[NRC] AEC GDC in 1971.

P. 71 /1.8 the [NRC] GDC '67 draft?

P. 71 / 1.24 [pushed] published P. 72 /1.8 [COL] CLB P. 73 / 1. 18 were to change, then the [accident] applicant P. 75 / 1. 1 [all].old P. 80 / 1. 14 [let] left P. 81 /1. 6 [seize] cease P. 86 / 1. 17 and am now P. 86 / 1.25 [muting] meeting P. 91 /1.25 [how] who P. 92 / 1.24 [This] Thus if you suspend the P. 92 /1.25 proceeding would [has] ,as Judge McDade pointed out_

P. 93 / 1. 19 summary [deposition] disposition

Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 93 /1. 22 summary [deposition] disposition P. 95 / 1. 8 Are we adopting [intention] contentions P. 103 / 1. 23 use the word "[intention] contention" P. 106 / 1. 10 [effected] affected P. 1'07 / 1. 4 [GOC] GDC P. 109 / 1. 10 statement was connected P. 109 / 14 that what there P. 109/ 1. 15 [buy-buy] abide by P. 112 / 1. 21 [GDCB adhere] GDC be adhered P. 116/1. 21 [can], can't attack the current licensing basis P. 117 / 1. 2 part of the staff [at] or Entergy P. 119 / 1. 21 action" and it carries on. ["]

P. 120 / 1. 22 (Laughter.)

P. 121 /1. 16 Unit [3] 2 P. 124 / 1. 7 further action."

P. 129 / 1. 22 [infects] affects P. 130 / 1.3 Unit [3] 2 P. 132 /1. 19 license approved, P. 135 / 1. 10 Unit [3] 2 P. 140 / 1. 17 But it is not that [they're] there P. 141/1. 1 [2.000] 2,000 P. 141 / 1. 8 I think it's "each nuclear facility"

Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 142 / 1. 7 operate [A,] a nuclear P. 142 / 1. 16 and the regulation says to operate "a" nuclear power plant P. 143 /1. 7 [SR. SPEC. AGENT MULLEN] JUDGE WARDWELL P. 148 / 1. 1 that's of importance here P. 150 / 1.20 It just seems like [there] there's a difference, P. 151 / 1. 19 proposal is strictly the combined power [outages] outputs of P. 152 / 1. 11 contain radioactive[ly] contaminants P. 154 / 1. 5 [of curves] occurs P. 154 / 1. 25 It was aerosolized_

P. 156 / 1. 12 hydro-geologically influenced P. 156/1. 18 of this effort [on] in P. 158 /1.23 one of the [A&Ps] AMPs P. 167 /1. 18 tank systems[?].

P. 168 /1. 16 applies to[;]

P. 168 / 1. 17 [field] fuel oil P. 169 /1. 7 Okay, if I could sort [of] out P. 170 / 1.23 They specifically [site] cite P. 171./1. 5 possible:

P. 171 / 1. 15 contention, supported P. 171 /1. 25 [application] declaration P. 177 /1. 3 [Adams] ADAMS P. 189 / 1. 11 And to come to Section [54-29] 54.29

Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 191/1. 11 [2309] 2.309 P. 201/1.3 [54.21-A. 1.(i)] 54.21(a)(1)(i)

P. 204 /1.21 [54.21-A.1.(i)] 54.21(a)(1)(i)

P. 208 /L.1 Part 54 at page [22.471] 22,471 P. 209 / 1.10 from Paul [Blanche] Blanch P. 209 /. 24 Paul [Blanche's] Blanch's P. 210/1. 18 Federal Register [22.471] 22,471 P. 210/1.24 Paul [Blanche] Blanch P. 213 /1. 3 [22-477] 22,477 P. 214 /1.24 Federal Register [22-471] 22,471 P. 215/1.9 Mr. [Blanche's] Blanch's P.215/1. 23 Mr. [Blanche] Blanch P. 221/1.4 putting up a wind farm, of conservation, P. 224 / 1. 13 Clinton was an early site P. 229 1. 21 their replies to [your's] yours P. 229 1. 24 in our Environmental [report] Repor P. 234 /1.3 Contention Eleven is that [DER] the ER P. 234 1. 5-6 Indian Point [II] 2 and Indian Point [III] 3 P. 234 1.9 [1I] 2 and [III] 3 P. 234 1.24 [conservatism] conservation P. 237 1. 10 Indian Point [II] 2 and Indian Point [III] 3

Text in brackets [ has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 241 / 1. 24 [C3.IIL] (c)(3)(ii)(L)

MARCH 11, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:

P. 253 /1. 4 Cortlandt, [CT] NY P. 254/1.11 specific [intentions] contentions P. 259/1. 1 Register [28.481] 28,48 P. 264/1. 13 responsibilities under [CIRCA (phonetic)] CERCLA P. 266 /1.25 threshold. It's [a really fast and] really cast in generic terms.

P. 270/1.10 of the Code at any particular power [point] plant P. 272/1.5 [in] and P. 272 /1. 7 [residents] residences P. 273 /1.25 summary [deposition] disposition stage P. 274 / 1.4 contention, which P. 274 /1. 5 contention that was at issue in Pilgrim P. 274/1.7 inputs, Judge Lathrop, as you said and [assumption] assumptions P. 274 / 1. 14 And I would just note that to [Entergy] Entergy's P. 274 / 1. 22 "[Date] Data on recovery P. 275/1. 1 severe reactor accidents."

P. 27(5/1.8 fortunately a [dire] dearth P. 279 /1. 7 a time because I'm this [hard-scribble] hard-scrabble P. 280 /1.20 saying it could [effect] affect

Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 280 /1. 24 might get influenced by that, P. 280 / 1.25 smaller particles, P. 283 /1.20 [upper west side] Upper West Side P. 289/1. 12 same term that the discussion that [State] Staff references P. 289/1. 15 [Wash] WASH P. 290 /'1. 10 MACCS2 Code, not that they demonstrated P. 292 /1.23 it's increased clean-up costs P. 302 /1. 15 identified the risk [that's at the] that a fire will disable P. 302 /1. 19 was [no] not evaluated P. 306/1. 15 information is going to [effect] affect P. 306/1. 17 controlling [condition] Commission case law P. 306 /1.23 of SAMA analysis that [is's] it's P. 308/1. 1 Because again we think it's a P. 308 /1.6 would materially [effect] affect P. 308 /1. 14 consider this information or you haven't [to] considered P. 308 /1. 17 properly~has [effected] affected P. 309 /1. 17 does this [effect] affect P. 311/1. 17-21 ["In order.to reduce the earthquake risk for IP 1 and to critical conjoin in adjacent Units 2 and 3 is necessary to improve the ability of IP l's critical components to withstand the effects of an earthquake."] "In order to reduce the earthquake risk for IPI (and to the conjoined and adjacent Units 2 and 3), it is necessary to improve the ability of IPl's critical components to withstand the effects of an earthquake."

Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 313/1. 6 [effect] affect P. 313/1.7 thing, how it's going to [effect] affect P. 316/1. 15 [siOtuations] situations P. 319/1.17 Is that correct[>] ?

P. 326/1. 3 system by system P. 327 / 1. 13 been [s] scoped in P. 329 /1.23 [Sherman] Sherwin P. 330 /1. 17 magnitude events and that's what's then [factor] factored into P. 333 /1. 1 [MS. SUTTON:] MR. TURK:

P. 333 /1. 3 [MR. TURK:] MS. SUTTON:

P. 335/1.5 But [is] if the dose is P. 336/1.21 [burroughs] boroughs P. 337/1. 13 into question - - this is an outdated, obsolete [node] model, P. 337/1. 17 [this] the siting of this plant, that [if] this P. 337/1. 19 what New York is interested in here P. 343 / 1. 14 in here (holding up CFR).

P. 343 /1. 24 promulgated, I believe it's part [2309] 2.309 P. 344/1.8 That's our burden under [2309] 2.309.

P. 346/1. 12 [NOAA Evaluation] no - evacuation P. 346/1. 19 what the Commission said in McGuire, [CO1217] CLI-217 P. 347 / 1. 15 not [a] at the contention [of] admissibility stage

Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 350/1. 16 [20.13] 2013 P. 350/1. 17 [20.15] 2015 P. 351 / 1.23 of the regulation that that be [addresses] addressed, P. 354 /1. 7 [MR. SIPOS:] MR. CHANDLER P. 360 / 1. 15 [MR.] MS. SUTTON:

P. 362 / 1. 15 Is this the [new reg.] NUREG of P. 362 / 1. 18 I believe it is. The [new reg.]NUREG P. 365 / 1.9 I would note, however, that the [present] premise of P. 373 / 1.9 systems, [structure] structures, P. 373 / 1. 10 the scope of 54.21(a) and therefore [is] are subject to P. 374 /1. 4, 11 [Leahy] Lahey P. 374 / 1. 12 declaration [in] and P. 375 /1. 18 [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 376 / 1.5, 25 [Leahy] Lahey P. 376 /1. 7 [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 376 / 1. 12 [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 377 / 1.13 [Leahy] Lahey P. 378 /1. 1, 17, 20, 23 [Leahy] Lahey P. 379 /1.4, 11 [Leahy] Lahey P. 379 / 1. 16 they have [filed] followed the guidance, P. 379 / 1. 18, 22 [Leahy] Lahey

Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 380 / 1.6 with now, then you won't know what [you] you've got as you're P. 380 / 1. 14, 16, 25 [Leahy] Lahey P. 381 / 1.8 program, and that's Entergy's burden. Our [expect] expert has P. 381 /1. 17 [Leahy] Lahey P. 381 / 1. 18 one paragraph on [pages] page 126 P. 382./1. 1 down to is a dispute between experts.

P. 382 /1. 17, 19 [Leahy] Lahey P. 383 / 1.6, 14, 22 [Leahy] Lahey P. 383 /1. 19 [MR.] MS. SUTTON P. 386 / 1. 10 [werer] were recessed, P. 388 /1.18 correct when they say that they have [gotten] got in their P. 391 /1. 18, 22 [Leahy] Lahey P. 393 /1.7 [Leahy] Lahey P. 395 /1. 20 facilities. It's [giving] given experience and aging.

P. 401 /1. 7 contention number [5] 25, P. 401 /1. 14 [Leahy] Lahey P. 402 /1. 3, 9, 14 [Leahy] Lahey P. 403 1. 3, 8, 22 [Leahy] Lahey P. 404 / 1. 5, 22 [Leahy] Lahey P. 404 /1. 25 requirements. But he also discusses the [sharpey] Charp test P. 406 / 1. 17 [Leahy] Lahey

Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 406 /1. 25 stainless steel. And even the welds of the [in-course] in-core P. 407 /1. 3 [Leahy] Lahey P. 407 /1. 6 these loads can damage the [course] core P. 407 /1. 9, 13, 18 [Leahy] Lahey P. 408 /1. 4, 9, 25 [Leahy] Lahey P. 409 1.4, 10, 15 [Leahy] Lahey P. 409 /. 16 [serous] serious P. 410 1. 11 [Leahy] Lahey P. 412 1. 10 [along] on the same date as its reply.

P. 415 /1. 14 regulation, [5413] 54.13 P. 440 1. 20 Unit 1 [spend] spent fuel pool P. 441 1.4 accurate [dada] data P. 441 / 1. 5 was [prepared] repaired P. 452 / 1.24 56 Federal Register [64-967] 64,967, P. 453 / 1.20 doesn't have to be made in the relicense [goes] does not go to the P. 453 / 1.21 mitigation of the environmental impacts [or] of a postulated P. 453 /1.22 or a severe accident, should it occur P. 454 / 1.7 [meteorological] radiological emergency preparedness plan for Indian P. 454 / 1.20 under the Part 51 regulations P. 454 / 1.21 appendix [subpart] B to subpart [appendix] A P. 454 / 1. 24 also gets to the heart of* yes, it was studied

Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line " Correction P. 455 /1. 15 environmental impacts of a nuclear facility P. 455/1. 17 us has failed to comply with the [updated] updating requirements P. 455 /1.22 the incorporation by reference of the [Wood] Witt report, P. 456 /1.8 [one is producing] once it sunsets, P. 459 /1.4 [sound] stated P. 460 /1.2 [Roni] Rani Franovich in her statement on the 19th of P. 460 /1.7 to that ten-year obligation [,] we had discussed earlier, P. 460 1. 11 2006, they really "kicked" it off "in earnest." That is P. 469 1.24 [permanent] permit in effect, P. 472 / 1.3 This is where I would not ask you to do the P. 472 1. 10 And the [DEIS] analysis P. 472 1. 24 Dilks. He has demonstrated [in] with great specificity and P.488/1. 10 issues means that they have [weighed] waived their legal P. 491 /1.23 as a sovereign state, is at this time unable to [see] cede P. 492 /1.5 now [that] and New York P. 492 /1. 13 individual [intervenor] intervenors P. 493 / 1. 21 excused. We would then start with [Portland] Cortlandt at 4:00 P. 493 /1.22 o'clock. Anyway, I believe [Portland] Cortlandt would be next at

Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction Questions on the Town of Cortlandt's Petition P. 496 / 1. 13 they have been very [obstructive] instructive P. 496 / 1. 16 of our contentions, Technical Contention [and Contention] 2 - on P. 496 / 1.25 and also appear P. 498 / 1. 1 course [of] in and of itself P. 498 / 1.3 Environmental Impact Statement [proceeds] precedes [and] such P. 500 /1. 2 report are generally promises to carry out [our] programs as P. 504 / 1. 1 [trust] thrust of the Sans'oucy affidavit P. 505 /1. 9 - 11 facility; [and] there is a considerable concern that we examine the issues of not licensing this facility [for] or relicensing [its] this facility.

P. 507 /1. 7 and indicate[s] that in that instance P. 509 /1. 3 pool issue, then we would elect to proceed under [23.5] 2.315.

Questions on the State of Connecticut's Petition P. 510 / 1.3 [started] stated yesterday P. 510 / 1. 14 [the] Westchester County P. 511 /1. 14 [effect] affect P. 512 / 1. 1 a significant amount P. 512 / 1.3 [west] east P. 516 / 1.24 [changed] changes P. 520 / 1.23 [for seeding] proceeding P. 522 /1. 22 [SR. SPEC. AGENT MULLEN] JUDGE WARDWELL

Text in brackets [] has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 524 / 1.2 [2-335] 2.335 MARCH 12, 2008 PROCEEDINGS:

Questions on Riverkeeper, Inc.'s Petition P. 529 / 1. 14 [Daronoco] Daronco P. 534 / 1. 16 [Philip] Phillip P. 537 / 1. 1 [and] of P. 537 / 1. 9 admissibility [and]

P. 537 / 1.20 [simple] simply P. 538 / 1. 13 pool[s]

P. 544 /1.4 that this was a P. 544 /1.6 the[y]

P. 544 / 1. 11 [this] that P. 544 / 1.22 broaden P. 545 / 1.2 position that P. 546 / 1.23 [2206] 2.206 P. 550 / 1.8 [2206] 2.206 P. 552 / 1.4 [2206] 2.206 P. 557 / 1.4 [3.206] 2.206 P. 557/ 1. 13 [206] 2.206 P. 557 /1. 16 says P. 568 / 1. 5 unsuc'cessful

Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 568/1. 11 it seems to me for P. 568 /1.24 referenced P. 575 /1. 15 [operated] uprate P. 580/1.6 [float] flow P. 584/1.9 CHECWORKS, P. 586/1. 10 [estrangement] entrainment P. 588/1.7 [MR. TURK] MR. TAFUR P. 589 /1. 12-13 entrainment and impingement P. 589 / 1. 14 entrainment and impingement P. 590 / 1. 13-14 entrainment and impingement P. 590/1. 19 levels [and] of impingement entrainment P. 595 / 1. 14 [FAQ] Fact P. 595 / 1. 17 entrainment and ,impingement P. 595 /1. 20 analysis is, P. 595 / 1. 21 submit it:

P. 605 /1.23 DEC P. 610/1. 17 [intentionally cause an] intentionally caused P. 610 / 1. 19 intentional P. 611/1. 16 caused attacks P. 612/1.25 [be] we have to do that P. 612/1. 14 [an amenable] a meaningful

.Text in brackets []has been deleted; underscored text has been added or corrected.

Page/Line Correction P. 613/1. 16 that's [a] Baltimore P. 615/1. 13 consequences P. 616/1. 19 you[r]

P. 623 / 1.25 says P. 623 /1. 1 [NUREG CR 6295] NUREG/CR-6295 P. 627 / 1.25 [balder] bald or P. 629/1.11 [difference is] differences P. 640 / 1.25 outlined P. 647 /1.21 [find] fine Capitalization Consistency Note:

If "Applicant," "Agency," and "Commission" are to be capitalized, then so, too, should "State" and "County" be capitalized.

Dated: April 2, 2008

/////

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML081580466&oldid=2156398"