ML11259A275: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:!Bulavinetz, Richard I From: Eccleston, Charles Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:59 PM To: Nancy.Ranek@exeloncorp.com; Edward.Keating@pseg.com Cc: Bulavinetz, Richard; Spangler, Nicole; Eccleston, Charles | {{#Wiki_filter:! | ||
Bulavinetz, Richard I From: Eccleston, Charles Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:59 PM To: Nancy.Ranek@exeloncorp.com; Edward.Keating@pseg.com Cc: Bulavinetz, Richard; Spangler, Nicole; Eccleston, Charles | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule Nancy, As we just discussed, much (most) of the information can be obtained simply from the tour. Also the tour often generates important questions that may need to be addressed during the interview. | FW: Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule | ||
Tour #5 and Interviews | : Nancy, As we just discussed, much (most) of the information can be obtained simply from the tour. Also the tour often generates important questions that may need to be addressed during the interview. Tour #5 and Interviews #8 and #9 are both four hours long. If we could simply switch tour 5 with interviews 8/9 it might. decrease the time that will be needed to complete interviews 8/9. | ||
#8 and #9 are both four hours long. If we could simply switch tour 5 with interviews 8/9 it might. decrease the time that will be needed to complete interviews 8/9.Charles From: Bulavinetz, Richard Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:48 PM To: Eccleston, Charles; Bacuta, George; Beissel, Dennis; Imboden, Andy; Klementowicz, Stephen; Logan, Dennis; Rikhoff, Jeffrey; Travers, Allison; Pham, Bo | Charles From: Bulavinetz, Richard Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:48 PM To: Eccleston, Charles; Bacuta, George; Beissel, Dennis; Imboden, Andy; Klementowicz, Stephen; Logan, Dennis; Rikhoff, Jeffrey; Travers, Allison; Pham, Bo | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule Charles: I appreciate the updated schedule.Re: Interview | RE: Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule Charles: | ||
# 8 | I appreciate the updated schedule. | ||
Re: Interview # 8 (T-lines, Terrestrial Ecology) 8:00AM -10:00 AM Wed Interview # 9 (Terrestrial Ecology) 10:00 AM - noon Wed Tour # 5 (T-Lines, Terrestrial ecology) 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM Wed I would prefer having Tour # 5 first (in the AM on Wed), followed by Interviews #8 & #9 (in the PM on Wed). Any questions I may have for the interviews would most likely be generated by what I observe during the tour, unless the interviews = presentations on the part of the licensee. Would that work for the reps from NJDEP, DNREC, & FWS you have listed as attending interview #9? Dennis Logan gave me the impression that there may be few-to-no other federal and state reps present for the terrestrial and aquatics components of the site visit. | |||
#8 & #9 (in the PM on Wed). Any questions I may have for the interviews would most likely be generated by what I observe during the tour, unless the interviews | : Thanks, Rich From: Eccleston, Charles Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:27 PM To: Bacuta, George; Beissel, Dennis; Bulavinetz, Richard; Imboden, Andy; Klementowicz, Stephen; Logan, Dennis; | ||
= presentations on the part of the licensee. | |||
Would that work for the reps from NJDEP, DNREC, & FWS you have listed as attending interview | Rikhoff, Jeffrey; Travers, Allison; Pham, Bo; Eccleston, Charles | ||
#9? Dennis Logan gave me the impression that there may be few-to-no other federal and state reps present for the terrestrial and aquatics components of the site visit.Thanks, Rich From: Eccleston, Charles Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:27 PM To: Bacuta, George; Beissel, Dennis; Bulavinetz, Richard; Imboden, Andy; Klementowicz, Stephen; Logan, Dennis; Rikhoff, Jeffrey; Travers, Allison; Pham, Bo; Eccleston, Charles | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule | Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule | ||
Note: as a result of a few conflicts and to ensure that the applicant has sufficiently knowledgable staff to support this schedule, the applicant has made some changes to the previous plan/schedule (combined a couple of similar interviews/tours etc.). Let me no ASAP if there are any problems with this plan or schedole.e4ats H. Eestqo, Charles H. Eccleston Nuclear Reactor Regulation Licensing Renewal, Project Manager 301.415.8537 charles.ecclestona~nrc.gov 2}} | : IDT, Here is the final version of the Salem/Hope site audit/plan. Note: as a result of a few conflicts and to ensure that the applicant has sufficiently knowledgable staff to support this schedule, the applicant has made some changes to the previous plan/schedule (combined a couple of similar interviews/tours etc.). Let me no ASAP if there are any problems with this plan or schedole. | ||
e4ats H. Eestqo, Charles H. Eccleston Nuclear Reactor Regulation Licensing Renewal, Project Manager 301.415.8537 charles.ecclestona~nrc.gov 2}} | |||
Revision as of 14:31, 12 November 2019
| ML11259A275 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/03/2010 |
| From: | Eccleston C Division of License Renewal |
| To: | Keating E, Ranek N Exelon Corp |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0113 | |
| Download: ML11259A275 (2) | |
Text
!
Bulavinetz, Richard I From: Eccleston, Charles Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:59 PM To: Nancy.Ranek@exeloncorp.com; Edward.Keating@pseg.com Cc: Bulavinetz, Richard; Spangler, Nicole; Eccleston, Charles
Subject:
FW: Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule
- Nancy, As we just discussed, much (most) of the information can be obtained simply from the tour. Also the tour often generates important questions that may need to be addressed during the interview. Tour #5 and Interviews #8 and #9 are both four hours long. If we could simply switch tour 5 with interviews 8/9 it might. decrease the time that will be needed to complete interviews 8/9.
Charles From: Bulavinetz, Richard Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:48 PM To: Eccleston, Charles; Bacuta, George; Beissel, Dennis; Imboden, Andy; Klementowicz, Stephen; Logan, Dennis; Rikhoff, Jeffrey; Travers, Allison; Pham, Bo
Subject:
RE: Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule Charles:
I appreciate the updated schedule.
Re: Interview # 8 (T-lines, Terrestrial Ecology) 8:00AM -10:00 AM Wed Interview # 9 (Terrestrial Ecology) 10:00 AM - noon Wed Tour # 5 (T-Lines, Terrestrial ecology) 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM Wed I would prefer having Tour # 5 first (in the AM on Wed), followed by Interviews #8 & #9 (in the PM on Wed). Any questions I may have for the interviews would most likely be generated by what I observe during the tour, unless the interviews = presentations on the part of the licensee. Would that work for the reps from NJDEP, DNREC, & FWS you have listed as attending interview #9? Dennis Logan gave me the impression that there may be few-to-no other federal and state reps present for the terrestrial and aquatics components of the site visit.
- Thanks, Rich From: Eccleston, Charles Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:27 PM To: Bacuta, George; Beissel, Dennis; Bulavinetz, Richard; Imboden, Andy; Klementowicz, Stephen; Logan, Dennis;
Rikhoff, Jeffrey; Travers, Allison; Pham, Bo; Eccleston, Charles
Subject:
Salem/Hope Site Audit Plan/Schedule
- IDT, Here is the final version of the Salem/Hope site audit/plan. Note: as a result of a few conflicts and to ensure that the applicant has sufficiently knowledgable staff to support this schedule, the applicant has made some changes to the previous plan/schedule (combined a couple of similar interviews/tours etc.). Let me no ASAP if there are any problems with this plan or schedole.
e4ats H. Eestqo, Charles H. Eccleston Nuclear Reactor Regulation Licensing Renewal, Project Manager 301.415.8537 charles.ecclestona~nrc.gov 2