ML12206A140: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 26, 2012 Mr. Peter T. Dietrich Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -STATUS OF 90-DAY RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECOMMENDATION 9.3 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 26, 2012 Mr. Peter T. Dietrich Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - STATUS OF 90-DAY RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECOMMENDATION 9.3 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT | |||
==Dear Mr. Dietrich:== | ==Dear Mr. Dietrich:== | ||
By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Request for Information (RFI) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54, paragraph (f), regarding Recommendations 2.1 (seismic and flooding evaluations), 2.3 (seismic and flooding walkdowns), and 9.3 (emergency preparedness communication and staffing) of the Near Term Task Force (NTTF) review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. | By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Request for Information (RFI) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54, paragraph (f), regarding Recommendations 2.1 (seismic and flooding evaluations), 2.3 (seismic and flooding walkdowns), and 9.3 (emergency preparedness communication and staffing) of the Near Term Task Force (NTTF) review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. With respect to Recommendation 9.3, Enclosure 5 to the NRC's letter requested licensees to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. In a letter dated June 6,2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12158A531), Southern California Edison (the licensee) submitted a response for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. | ||
With respect to Recommendation 9.3, Enclosure 5 to the NRC's letter requested licensees to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. In a letter dated June 6,2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12158A531), Southern California Edison (the licensee) submitted a response for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The RFI required responses pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f), including communication item 2, and staffing items 3, 4, and 5. Item 2 of the communication enclosure pertains to interim actions to power supplies. | The RFI required responses pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f), including communication item 2, and staffing items 3, 4, and 5. Item 2 of the communication enclosure pertains to interim actions to power supplies. Items 3, 4, and 5 of the staffing enclosure pertain to notification methods for augmented staff, methods of access to the site, and interim actions prior to the completion of the staffing assessment. The responses to communication items 1 and 3, as well as staffing items 1, 2, and 6 are expected to be submitted consistent with the schedule provided in the licensee's 60-day response letter dated May 9, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12132A375). | ||
Items 3, 4, and 5 of the staffing enclosure pertain to notification methods for augmented staff, methods of access to the site, and interim actions prior to the completion of the staffing assessment. | Also consistent with the 60-day response, the NRC expects the licensee to address in the final staffing analysis the methods of access to the site requested in staffing item 4 related to air transport methods. The NRC staff acknowledges that the licensee provided the information requested in the RFI regarding the 90-day response for Recommendation 9.3 for communication item 2, and staffing items 3,4, and 5, within the time requested. The NRC staff has reviewed the responses by the licensee to these issues for adequacy of the information and has no additional questions. Regarding communications items 1 and 3, and staffing items 1, 2, | ||
The responses to communication items 1 and 3, as well as staffing items 1, 2, and 6 are expected to be submitted consistent with the schedule provided in the licensee's 60-day response letter dated May 9, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12132A375). | |||
Also consistent with the 60-day response, the NRC expects the licensee to address in the final staffing analysis the methods of access to the site requested in staffing item 4 related to air transport methods. The NRC staff acknowledges that the licensee provided the information requested in the RFI regarding the 90-day response for Recommendation 9.3 for communication item 2, and staffing items 3,4, and 5, within the time requested. | P. Dietrich -2 and 6, the staff will review the information when it is provided in accordance with the schedule found in the licensee's May 9, 2012, letter. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed the responses by the licensee to these issues for adequacy of the information and has no additional questions. | If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ms. Jessica Kratchman at (301) 415-5512. | ||
Regarding communications items 1 and 3, and staffing items 1, 2, P. Dietrich -2 and 6, the staff will review the information when it is provided in accordance with the schedule found in the licensee's May 9, 2012, letter. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ms. Jessica Kratchman at (301) 415-5512. | Sincerely, Michele G. Evans, Director Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 cc: Distribution via Listserv | ||
Sincerely, Michele G. Evans, Director Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 cc: Distribution via Listserv | |||
ML11206A140 *via e-mail NRR-106 OFFICE NRRJDORULPL4/PM NRRJDORULPL4/LA 1NSIRJDPRJNRLB/BC NRRJDORULPL4/BC NRRJDORUD MEvans NAME JSebrosky JBurkhardt [KWilliams- MMarkley (LLund for) | |||
DATE 7/25/12 *7/25/12 l7/16/2012 7/25/12 7/26/12}} | |||
*via e-mail NRR-106 OFFICE NRRJDORULPL4/PM NRRJDORULPL4/LA | |||
[KWilliams-MMarkley (LLund for) DATE 7/25/12 *7/25/12 l7/16/2012 7/25/12 7/26/12 | |||
Revision as of 00:39, 12 November 2019
| ML12206A140 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/2012 |
| From: | Marilyn Evans Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
| To: | Peter Dietrich Southern California Edison Co |
| Sebrosky J | |
| References | |
| Download: ML12206A140 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 26, 2012 Mr. Peter T. Dietrich Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Southern California Edison Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128
SUBJECT:
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - STATUS OF 90-DAY RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECOMMENDATION 9.3 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT
Dear Mr. Dietrich:
By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Request for Information (RFI) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54, paragraph (f), regarding Recommendations 2.1 (seismic and flooding evaluations), 2.3 (seismic and flooding walkdowns), and 9.3 (emergency preparedness communication and staffing) of the Near Term Task Force (NTTF) review of insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. With respect to Recommendation 9.3, Enclosure 5 to the NRC's letter requested licensees to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. In a letter dated June 6,2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12158A531), Southern California Edison (the licensee) submitted a response for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3.
The RFI required responses pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f), including communication item 2, and staffing items 3, 4, and 5. Item 2 of the communication enclosure pertains to interim actions to power supplies. Items 3, 4, and 5 of the staffing enclosure pertain to notification methods for augmented staff, methods of access to the site, and interim actions prior to the completion of the staffing assessment. The responses to communication items 1 and 3, as well as staffing items 1, 2, and 6 are expected to be submitted consistent with the schedule provided in the licensee's 60-day response letter dated May 9, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12132A375).
Also consistent with the 60-day response, the NRC expects the licensee to address in the final staffing analysis the methods of access to the site requested in staffing item 4 related to air transport methods. The NRC staff acknowledges that the licensee provided the information requested in the RFI regarding the 90-day response for Recommendation 9.3 for communication item 2, and staffing items 3,4, and 5, within the time requested. The NRC staff has reviewed the responses by the licensee to these issues for adequacy of the information and has no additional questions. Regarding communications items 1 and 3, and staffing items 1, 2,
P. Dietrich -2 and 6, the staff will review the information when it is provided in accordance with the schedule found in the licensee's May 9, 2012, letter.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ms. Jessica Kratchman at (301) 415-5512.
Sincerely, Michele G. Evans, Director Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 cc: Distribution via Listserv
ML11206A140 *via e-mail NRR-106 OFFICE NRRJDORULPL4/PM NRRJDORULPL4/LA 1NSIRJDPRJNRLB/BC NRRJDORULPL4/BC NRRJDORUD MEvans NAME JSebrosky JBurkhardt [KWilliams- MMarkley (LLund for)
DATE 7/25/12 *7/25/12 l7/16/2012 7/25/12 7/26/12