ML13282A682: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman, Richard Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:15 PM To: Gray, Corey A Cc: Alter, Kent R; Patterson, Terry L | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman, Richard Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:15 PM To: Gray, Corey A Cc: Alter, Kent R; Patterson, Terry L | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: ONS Relief Request 13-ON-001 Part II Submittal Corey, | RE: ONS Relief Request 13-ON-001 Part II Submittal | ||
: Corey, The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of the subject Oconee Unit 3 Relief Request (RR) dated September 26, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. | |||
ML13273A037). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ML13273A037). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed the RR and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to | The NRC staff has reviewed the RR and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. | ||
This message will be added to ADAMS as an official agency record. If you have any questions, please contact me. | This message will be added to ADAMS as an official agency record. If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov From: Gray, Corey A [mailto:Corey.Gray@duke-energy.com | Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov From: Gray, Corey A [mailto:Corey.Gray@duke-energy.com] | ||
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 12:46 PM To: Guzman, Richard Cc: Alter, Kent R; Patterson, Terry L | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
ONS Relief Request 13-ON-001 Part II Submital Richard, | ONS Relief Request 13-ON-001 Part II Submital | ||
: Richard, Please see attached Part 2 of ONSs request for relief 13-ON-001 submittal. If you have any question please contact me. | |||
Corey Gray Oconee Nuclear Station Regulatory Compliance 864-873-6325}} | Corey Gray Oconee Nuclear Station Regulatory Compliance 864-873-6325}} | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 4 November 2019
| ML13282A682 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 10/09/2013 |
| From: | Richard Guzman Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Gray C Duke Energy Carolinas |
| Guzman R | |
| References | |
| Download: ML13282A682 (2) | |
Text
From: Guzman, Richard Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:15 PM To: Gray, Corey A Cc: Alter, Kent R; Patterson, Terry L
Subject:
RE: ONS Relief Request 13-ON-001 Part II Submittal
- Corey, The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of the subject Oconee Unit 3 Relief Request (RR) dated September 26, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13273A037). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed the RR and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
This message will be added to ADAMS as an official agency record. If you have any questions, please contact me.
Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov From: Gray, Corey A [1]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 12:46 PM To: Guzman, Richard Cc: Alter, Kent R; Patterson, Terry L
Subject:
ONS Relief Request 13-ON-001 Part II Submital
- Richard, Please see attached Part 2 of ONSs request for relief 13-ON-001 submittal. If you have any question please contact me.
Corey Gray Oconee Nuclear Station Regulatory Compliance 864-873-6325