ML17233A006: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Venkataraman, Booma Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:16 AM To: Neff, David B:(GenCo-Nuc) | ||
Cc:Williams, Christian D:(GenCo-Nuc); Danna, James | Cc: Williams, Christian D:(GenCo-Nuc); Danna, James | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: FitzPatrick - | ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: FitzPatrick - Relief Requests (8) from ASME OM Code (2004 Edition with Addenda through OMb-2006); (CAC Nos. MG0052, MG0053, MG0054, MG0055, MG0056, MG0057, MG0058, MG0061) | ||
Expires: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 12:00 | Expires: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 12:00 AM By letter dated August 3, 2017 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML17219A123), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted eight relief requests for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant that request relief from certain requirements in the ASME OM Code, 2004 Edition with Addenda through OMb-2006, associated with the Fifth Ten-Year Inservice Testing Interval. The descriptions of the relief requests are noted below. | ||
ML17219A123), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted eight relief requests for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant that request relief from certain requirements in the ASME OM Code, 2004 Edition with Addenda through OMb-2006, associated with the Fifth Ten-Year Inservice Testing Interval. The descriptions of the relief requests are noted | Relief Request Description Proposed Alternative CAC No. | ||
in accordance with | |||
below. Relief Request Description Proposed Alternative CAC No. in accordance with 1. PRR-01, Rev. 0 Core Spray Pump Suction Pressure Gauge Range 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0052 | : 1. PRR-01, Rev. 0 Core Spray Pump Suction Pressure Gauge Range 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0052 | ||
: 2. PRR-02, Rev. 0 RHRSW Smooth Running Pumps 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0053 3. PRR-03, Rev. 0 RHR Pump Vibration Alert Range 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0054 4. PRR-04, Rev. 0 Code Case OMN-21 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0055 | : 2. PRR-02, Rev. 0 RHRSW Smooth Running Pumps 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0053 | ||
: 3. PRR-03, Rev. 0 RHR Pump Vibration Alert Range 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0054 | |||
: 4. PRR-04, Rev. 0 Code Case OMN-21 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0055 | |||
: 5. VRR-01, Rev. 0 TIP CIV Stroke Time 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0056 | : 5. VRR-01, Rev. 0 TIP CIV Stroke Time 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0056 | ||
: 6. VRR-02, Rev. 0 EFCV Sampling 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0057 | : 6. VRR-02, Rev. 0 EFCV Sampling 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0057 | ||
: 7. VRR-03, Rev. 0 Code Case OMN-17 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0058 | : 7. VRR-03, Rev. 0 Code Case OMN-17 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0058 | ||
: 8. VRR-04, Rev. 0 Leak Test at App J Frequency 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0061 The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | : 8. VRR-04, Rev. 0 Leak Test at App J Frequency 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0061 The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of these relief requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the eight proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the eight proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of these eight relief requests will take approximately 640 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete the review of these licensing actions by May 1, 2018, as requested in your August 3, 2017, letter. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of these eight | 1 | ||
relief requests will take approximately 640 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete the review of these licensing actions by May 1, 2018, as requested in your August 3, 2017, letter. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | |||
Sincerely, Booma Booma Venkataraman, P.E. Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1 | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415 2934. | |||
Sincerely, Booma Booma Venkataraman, P.E. | |||
Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov 301.415.2934 2 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3673 Mail Envelope Properties (8c1d45acab3941f69fe7153d4cbb01db) | |||
Hearing Identifier: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: FitzPatrick - Relief Requests (8) from ASME OM Code (2004 Edition with Addenda through OMb-2006); (CAC Nos. MG0052, MG0053, MG0054, MG0055, MG0056, MG0057, MG0058, MG0061) | ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: FitzPatrick - Relief Requests (8) from ASME OM Code (2004 Edition with Addenda through OMb-2006); (CAC Nos. MG0052, MG0053, MG0054, MG0055, MG0056, MG0057, MG0058, MG0061) | ||
Sent Date: | Sent Date: 8/18/2017 11:15:48 AM Received Date: 8/18/2017 11:15:00 AM From: Venkataraman, Booma Created By: Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
"Williams, Christian D:(GenCo-Nuc)" <Christian.Williams@exeloncorp.com> | |||
Recipients: | Tracking Status: None "Danna, James" <James.Danna@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Neff, David B:(GenCo-Nuc)" <david.neff@exeloncorp.com> | |||
Post Office: | Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3777 8/18/2017 11:15:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: 10/17/2017 Recipients Received:}} | ||
Options | |||
Revision as of 20:41, 29 October 2019
| ML17233A006 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 08/18/2017 |
| From: | Booma Venkataraman Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Deborah Neff Exelon Generation Co |
| References | |
| MG0052, MG0053, MG0054, MG0055, MG0056, MG0057, MG0058, MG0061 | |
| Download: ML17233A006 (3) | |
Text
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Venkataraman, Booma Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:16 AM To: Neff, David B:(GenCo-Nuc)
Cc: Williams, Christian D:(GenCo-Nuc); Danna, James
Subject:
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: FitzPatrick - Relief Requests (8) from ASME OM Code (2004 Edition with Addenda through OMb-2006); (CAC Nos. MG0052, MG0053, MG0054, MG0055, MG0056, MG0057, MG0058, MG0061)
Expires: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 12:00 AM By letter dated August 3, 2017 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML17219A123), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted eight relief requests for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant that request relief from certain requirements in the ASME OM Code, 2004 Edition with Addenda through OMb-2006, associated with the Fifth Ten-Year Inservice Testing Interval. The descriptions of the relief requests are noted below.
Relief Request Description Proposed Alternative CAC No.
in accordance with
- 1. PRR-01, Rev. 0 Core Spray Pump Suction Pressure Gauge Range 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0052
- 2. PRR-02, Rev. 0 RHRSW Smooth Running Pumps 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0053
- 3. PRR-03, Rev. 0 RHR Pump Vibration Alert Range 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0054
- 4. PRR-04, Rev. 0 Code Case OMN-21 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0055
- 5. VRR-01, Rev. 0 TIP CIV Stroke Time 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) MG0056
- 6. VRR-02, Rev. 0 EFCV Sampling 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0057
- 7. VRR-03, Rev. 0 Code Case OMN-17 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0058
- 8. VRR-04, Rev. 0 Leak Test at App J Frequency 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1) MG0061 The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of these relief requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in the characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the eight proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the review of these eight relief requests will take approximately 640 hours0.00741 days <br />0.178 hours <br />0.00106 weeks <br />2.4352e-4 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete the review of these licensing actions by May 1, 2018, as requested in your August 3, 2017, letter. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
1
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415 2934.
Sincerely, Booma Booma Venkataraman, P.E.
Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov 301.415.2934 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3673 Mail Envelope Properties (8c1d45acab3941f69fe7153d4cbb01db)
Subject:
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: FitzPatrick - Relief Requests (8) from ASME OM Code (2004 Edition with Addenda through OMb-2006); (CAC Nos. MG0052, MG0053, MG0054, MG0055, MG0056, MG0057, MG0058, MG0061)
Sent Date: 8/18/2017 11:15:48 AM Received Date: 8/18/2017 11:15:00 AM From: Venkataraman, Booma Created By: Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Williams, Christian D:(GenCo-Nuc)" <Christian.Williams@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Danna, James" <James.Danna@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Neff, David B:(GenCo-Nuc)" <david.neff@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3777 8/18/2017 11:15:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: 10/17/2017 Recipients Received: