ML18096A836: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:'I e Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station July 14, 1992 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 | {{#Wiki_filter:'I e | ||
PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station July 14, 1992 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 | |||
==Dear Sir:== | ==Dear Sir:== | ||
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEM NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of June 1992 are being sent to you. | |||
50-272 SALEM 1 JULY 10, 1992 J. FEST (609)339-2904 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. | Average Daily Unit Power Level Operating Data Report Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions Safety Related Maintenance lOCFR50.59 Evaluations Operating Summary Refueling Information RH:pc cc: Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 Enclosures* | ||
The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | 8-1-7.R4 | ||
ITEM | __Ihe_EIJ_e_r_qy_peqi:>le 9207200338 920630 PDR ADOCK 05000272 95-2189 (10M) 12-89 R PDR | ||
., | |||
AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Docket No.: 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 07/10/92 Completed by: Mark Shedlock Telephone: 339-2122 Month June 1992 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31-16 0 P. 8.1-7 R1 | |||
. | |||
OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No: 50-272 Date: 07/10/92 Completed by: Mark Shedlock Telephone: 339-2122 Operating Status | |||
: 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes | |||
: 2. Reporting Period June 1992 | |||
: 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 | |||
: 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 | |||
: 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 | |||
: 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 | |||
: 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 | |||
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason NA | |||
: 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) N/A | |||
: 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any ~~~~~~-N""""""=A.__~~~~~~~~~~~ | |||
This Month Year to Date Cumulative | |||
: 11. Hours in Reporting Period 720 4367 131520 | |||
: 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 0 2256.2 85856.4 | |||
: 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0 | |||
: 14. Hours Generator On-Line 0 2117.8 83165.7 | |||
: 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0 | |||
: 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 0 7203120.0 262700265.2* | |||
: 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 0 2416240 87220870 | |||
: 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) -3331 2305872 83082445 | |||
: 19. Unit Service Factor 0 48.5 . 63. 2 | |||
: 20. Unit Availability Factor 0 48.5 63.2 | |||
: 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 0 47.7 57.1 | |||
: 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 0 47.4 56.7 | |||
: 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 100 8.1 21.0 | |||
: 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each) | |||
We are presently in a forced maintenance outage. | |||
: 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: | |||
July 28.1992 8-l-7.R2 | |||
UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH JUNE 1992 DOCKET NO.: -'5=0=--=2n'-=---- | |||
UNIT NAME: Salem #1 DATE: 07/10/92 COMPLETED BY: Mark Shedlock TELEPHONE: 339-2122 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DURATION DOWN EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION NO. DATE TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 6 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE - | |||
0016 06/01/92 s 672.0 c 4 ------------ RC FUELXX NUCLEAR NORMAL REFUELING 0017 06/29/92 F 48.0 B 4 CH PIPEXX STEAM GEN. PIPING REPAIRS 1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - Same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refuel ing 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of CNUREG-0161) | |||
E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain) | |||
SAFETY RELATED MAINTENANCE DOCKET NO: 50-272 | |||
. MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339.;...2904 WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 890429014 1 lB REACTOR TRIP BYPASS BREAKER FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE THE UNDERVOLTAGE TRIP DEVICE 890429016 1 lA REACTOR TRIP BYPASS BREAKER FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE THE UNDERVOLTAGE TRIP DEVICE 910320151 1 FLUX THIMBLES FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE 6 UNIT 1 FLUX THIMBLES 910718114 1 VALVE 11SW40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE HAS NO CLOSED INDICATION - | |||
TROUBLESHOOT 910724130 1 VALVE 16SW15 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE IS LEAKING THOUGH, INSPECT AND REPAIR 911118119 1 SOLENOID VALVE 1SV263 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1SV263 HAS LEAKING TUBING - | |||
REWORK 911226077 1 VALVE 1SW175 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1SW175 HAS NO CLOSED INDICATION - INVESTIGATE 920123168 1 SPOOL RD-1-SW-112 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: SPOOL RD-1-SW-112 UT EXAMINATION UNSAT - FABRICATE AND INSTALL REPLACEMENT SPOOL 920201007 1 VALVE 1PR15 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1PR15 - REPLACE DIAPHRAGM 920218126 1 VALVE 1PR2 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1PR2/PZR PORV - REPLACE COVER PLATE AND DIAPHRAGM | |||
*e SAFETY RELATED MAINTENANCE DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST (cont'd) TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 920405078 1 SPOOL 1-SW-P-1108 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: SPOOL 1-SW-P-1108 HAS A THROUGH WALL LEAK - REPAIR 920415158 1 VALVE 1SS49 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 12249 FAILED LEAK RATE TEST | |||
~ OPEN, INSPECT AND REPAIR 920420109 1 CRDM CABLES FAILURE DESCRIPTION: UNIT 1 CRDM CABLE PROBLEMS FOUND DURING REACTOR DISASSEMBLY - | |||
REPAIR 920421149 1 VALVE 1CV4 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1CV4 FAILED LRT/STROKE - | |||
TROUBLESHOOT 920424091 1 13 SWITCHGEAR RM SUPPLY FAN FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 13 SWITCHGEAR ROOM SUPPLY FAN STARTS - WON'T STOP - INVESTIGATE 920504115 1 VALVE 11SW21 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 11SW21 HAS NO CLOSED INDICATION - TROUBLESHOOT 920511088 1 VALVE 1SJ68 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1SJ68 GREASE UNSAT - REFURBISH OPERATOR 920511098 1 VALVE 1SJ40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 11SJ40 GREASE UNSAT - REFURBISH OPERATOR 920511099 1 VALVE 11RH29 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 11RH9 GREASE UNSAT - REFURBISH OPERATOR | |||
SAFETY RELATED MAINTENANCE DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST (cont'd) TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 | |||
-------------------~-----------------------------~------------------------ | |||
WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 920522157 1 1 AUX ANNUNCIATOR FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1 AUX ANNUNCIATOR DID NOT ALARM - | |||
TROUBLESHOOT & REWORK 920525016 1 lA REACTOR TRIP BREAKER FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE THE UNDERVOLTAGE TRIP DEVICE 920530125 1 lA D/G OUTPUT BREAKER FAILURE DESCRIPTION: lA D/G OUTPUT BREAKER SPRINGS NOT CHARGING - TROUBLESHOOT 920607088 1 VALVE 1CV277 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1CV277 BLOWN DIAPHRAGM - REPAIR 920610098 *1 13 CHARGING PUMP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 13 CHARGING SUCTION STABILIZER BLADDER LEAKS - REPLACE 920611212 1 VALVE 1CV41 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: SIMULTANEOUS OPEN & CLOSED LIGHTS WITH VALVE IN CLOSED POSITION - | |||
INVESTIGATE 920613059 1 VALVE 1PR6 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: INSPECT AND TROUBLESHOOT THE 1PR6 OPERATOR 920615207 1 VALVE 1CC131 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1CC131 HAS YOKE MOVEMENT - | |||
REWORK AS REQUIRED 920617158 1 VALVE 13SW72 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 13SW72 JAMMED - OPEN, INSPECT & | |||
REPAIR | |||
---------------------------------~---------------------------------------- | |||
MONTH: - JUNE 1992 | |||
* SAFETY RELATED MAINTENANCE DOCKET NO: | |||
UNIT NAME: | |||
DATE: | |||
50-272 SALEM 1 JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST (cont'd) TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 920618108 1 VALVE 1SS64 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1SS64 HAS NO OPEN INDICATION - | |||
INVESTIGATE & REPAIR 920620085 1 VALVE 12CV104 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 12CV104 WILL NOT OPEN - | |||
INVESTIGATE 920625090 1 12 CHILLER COMPRESSOR FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 12 CHILLER COMPRESSOR WILL NOT START - TROUBLESHOOT & REPAIR 920627058 1 VALVE 1CC18 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1CC18 FAILED STROKE TIME - | |||
INVESTIGATE 920006026 1 VALVE 1PR7 CABLES FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE 1PR7 CONTROL AND POWER CABLES | |||
10CFR50~59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 | |||
. MONTH: - JUNE 1992 .UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
A. Design Change Packages (DCP) | |||
DCP# lEC-3138 Pkg. 1 "Radwaste Panel Upgrade" - This DCP will provide for revitalization upgrades to Rad Waste Panel 104 and related equipment on elevations 84' and 64' of the Auxiliary Building. The upgrades will consist of the following: a) replacement of the obsolete instrumentation, b) physical repair of Panel 104, c) provision of new labels to enhance operator interface with this panel, d) removal of unused components, including associated components external to the panel, e) upgrade of panel wire, cable restraints and labels, and f) functional verification of all panel instruments and components. Replacement of certain components used to monitor the administratively controlled transfer and release of radiological liquids and gasses will not affect the limiting conditions or safety margins as described in the Technical Specifications. (SORC 92-065) | |||
DCP # lEA-1030 Pkg. 1 "Replacement of 1CC924 Mark #D-2 with Mark #D-65 11 | |||
- The purpose of this design change is to revise the appropriate documentation to change valve 1CC94 from a mark no. D-2 to a mark no. D-65. | |||
This is a Component Cooling drain valve located in the no. 12 cc Heat Exchanger Room, which had been replaced under WO 881010102. The replacement of a non-nuclear valve with a nuclear class 3 valve ensures the integrity of the system. Installing the valves properly with a Code Job Package and performing the NDE ensures the integrity of the pressure boundary. This does not change the function of the system and does not impact the requirement of having two independent trains. | |||
Therefore, this change will not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 92-067) | |||
10CFR50~59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd) | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
These circuit breakers are located at the 6A20, 6A22, 6A9 and 6A10 positions in the No. 11 Circulating Water Intake 230V Control Center Sect, No. 1 (located in CWI Control House #1). The change is to GE type TED 15 amp circuit breakers. | DCP# lEC-3155 Pkg. 1 "Circulating Water Screen Wash Strainer Breaker" - | ||
This DCP does not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification because the change in screen wash pump strainer circuit breakers will not affect any of the operating limits necessary to protect the fission barriers inherent in the plant's design. (SORC 92-069) B. Procedures and Revisions SC.SA-AP.ZZ-0012(Q) "Technical Specification Surveillance Program Matrix" Rev. 16 -This proposal involves a revision to station Administrative Procedure, SC.SA-AP.ZZ-0012(Q), Technical Specification Surveillance Program. The responsibility for performing Appendix "B" surveillance number 4.2.1 (Unit 1 & 2) has been changed from Licensing and Regulation to Chemistry/ | The purpose of this change is to change the type and rating of the four circuit breakers that control the branch circuits used to feed No. 11, 12, 13, and 14 screen wash strainers. These circuit breakers are located at the 6A20, 6A22, 6A9 and 6A10 positions in the No. 11 Circulating Water Intake 230V Control Center Sect, No. 1 (located in CWI Control House #1). The change is to GE type TED 15 amp circuit breakers. This DCP does not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification because the change in screen wash pump strainer circuit breakers will not affect any of the operating limits necessary to protect the fission barriers inherent in the plant's design. (SORC 92-069) | ||
Licensing and Regulation.. | B. Procedures and Revisions SC.SA-AP.ZZ-0012(Q) "Technical Specification Surveillance Program Matrix" Rev. 16 - This proposal involves a revision to station Administrative Procedure, SC.SA-AP.ZZ-0012(Q), Technical Specification Surveillance Program. The responsibility for performing Appendix "B" surveillance number 4.2.1 (Unit 1 & 2) has been changed from Licensing and Regulation to Chemistry/ Licensing and Regulation.. This revision to the procedure does not change any previously analyzed testing requirement nor does it change any testing method, therefore the proposal cannot reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-064) | ||
This revision to the procedure does not change any previously analyzed testing requirement nor does it change any testing method, therefore the proposal cannot reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-064) TSl.OP-SO.AF-OOOl(Q) "Auxiliary Feedwater System Operation" -The No. 13 Auxiliary .Feedwater Pump (AFWP) recirculation line was cut by mistake in order to allow the Maintenance Department to the 13 AFWP turbine. This line is open ended back to the_ tank so there is no way to isolate the line to repair it by welding the pipe back together. | TSl.OP-SO.AF-OOOl(Q) "Auxiliary Feedwater System Operation" - The No. | ||
This temporary procedure will allow the Operations Department to drain the contents of the Unit 1 Auxiliary Feed Water Storage Tank by filling the steam generators using the motor driven AFWP. The 10CFR50;59 EVALUATIONS . MONTH: -JUNE 1992 | 13 Auxiliary .Feedwater Pump (AFWP) recirculation line was cut by mistake in order to allow the Maintenance Department to ~ebuild the 13 AFWP turbine. This line is open ended back to the_ tank so there is no way to isolate the line to repair it by welding the pipe back together. This temporary procedure will allow the Operations Department to drain the contents of the Unit 1 Auxiliary Feed Water Storage Tank by filling the steam generators using the motor driven AFWP. The | ||
10CFR50;59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 | |||
. MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE:* JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd) | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
pumps are required to be operable in Modes 1, 2 and 3, however, they are not required to be operable in Modes 4, 5 and 6. The basis for these operability requirements is to be able to cool the plant down to less than 350°F from normal operating conditions even in the event of a loss of offsite power. When the plant is in Modes 5 or 6, the Reactor Coolant System temperature is less than 350°F and is being cooled by the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System, so the basis for the Auxiliary Feed Technical Specifications does not apply. This temporary procedure does not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis of Technical Specification 3.7.1.2 because the plant can be maintained in a safe shutdown condition by the RHR system and auxiliary feed is not required. (SORC 92-064) | |||
SCPl Rev. 3 "L.oss or Degradation of Physical Security System" | |||
- This procedure has been revised to incorporate the changed reference to security contingency event reporting pursuant to revised NRC guidance. | |||
The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection.between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067) | |||
SCP2 Rev. 3 "Loss of Security Computer Power" - This procedure has been revised to incorporate the changed reference to security contingency event reporting pursuant to revised NRC guidance and to include Operations under the responsibilities section (for restoration of power). The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. | |||
There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. | |||
(SORC 92-067) | |||
10CFR50~59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 | |||
. MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME:* SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd) | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
SCP5 Rev. 3 | |||
There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067) "Discovery of Intruders or Attack" -The procedure for initial rapid deployment and follow up actions in response to a confirmed intrusion has been revised. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. | SCP5 Rev. 3 "Security Threat" - The procedure has been revised to add extortion to the threat profile. A sentence is added on security force job knowledge, self control, and professionalism, particularly under stress, as contributing to the perception and reality of a secure work place. The systematic method of searching for destructive devices is changed to be compatible with current training methods. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. | ||
There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067). "Discovery of Destructive Devices or Evidence of Malicious Acts" -The revision changes assignments for making required nptif ications of the onset of the event, to reduce the burden on alarm station personnel during initial response. | There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. | ||
New emphasis is added on searching for additional devices and malicious acts, regardless of what caused the event to be declared. | (SORC 92-067) | ||
The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. | SCP6 Rev. 3 "Discovery of Intruders or Attack" - The procedure for initial rapid deployment and follow up actions in response to a confirmed intrusion has been revised. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067). | ||
There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067) 10C"FR50.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: -JUNE 1992 | SCPlO Rev. 3 "Discovery of Destructive Devices or Evidence of Malicious Acts" - The revision changes assignments for making required nptif ications of the onset of the event, to reduce the burden on alarm station personnel during initial response. New emphasis is added on searching for additional devices and malicious acts, regardless of what caused the event to be declared. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. | ||
There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. | |||
(SORC 92-067) | |||
10C"FR50.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd) | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
SCP12 Rev. 3 "Security Alert" -The procedure has been revised to expand the discussion of possible basis for declaring a Security Alert and to add direction concerning use of defensive positions. | |||
The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. | SCP12 Rev. 3 "Security Alert" - The procedure has been revised to expand the discussion of possible basis for declaring a Security Alert and to add direction concerning use of defensive positions. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067) | ||
There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067) C. Temporary Modifications TMR# 92-037 "Monitoring Temperatures at Different Locations Inside the Pressurizer Enclosure" -pressurizer insulation was replaced with NUKON fiberglass type insulation, to reduce the temperature inside the pressurizer enclosure. | C. Temporary Modifications TMR# 92-037 "Monitoring Temperatures at Different Locations Inside the Pressurizer Enclosure" - ~he pressurizer insulation was replaced with NUKON fiberglass type insulation, to reduce the temperature inside the pressurizer enclosure. | ||
This temporary modification proposes to monitor the temperature inside the pressurizer enclosure. | This temporary modification proposes to monitor the temperature inside the pressurizer enclosure. | ||
The results will be used to evaluate the efficiency of the fiberglass insulation, determine the qualified life of cables inside the enclosure, and provide reliable means of evaluating heat stress conditions inside the pressurizer enclosure. | The results will be used to evaluate the efficiency of the fiberglass insulation, determine the qualified life of cables inside the enclosure, and provide reliable means of evaluating heat stress conditions inside the pressurizer enclosure. The temperature monitoring device does not perform any safety related function and does not affect any safety related system required for the safe shutdown of the Salem Unit. There is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. | ||
The temperature monitoring device does not perform any safety related function and does not affect any safety related system required for the safe shutdown of the Salem Unit. There is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-065) TMR# 92-039 Rev. 1 "Transfer Unit 2 BAST to Unit 1 BAST" -The purpose of this temporary modification is to cross connect Unit 1 and Unit 2 Boric Acid storage Tanks (BAST) and be able to pump Unit 2 BAST to Unit 1 BAST to meet Tech Spec requirements on Unit 1. The Technical Specifications dealing with required boration flowpath were reviewed. | (SORC 92-065) | ||
The flowpath is from the Boric Acid Storage Tank (BAST) to the Boric Acid Transfer Pump (BATP) to the Reactor Coolant System (RCS), or Refueling Water Storage 10CFR50-.59 EVALUATIONS | TMR# 92-039 Rev. 1 "Transfer Unit 2 BAST to Unit 1 BAST" - The purpose of this temporary modification is to cross connect Unit 1 and Unit 2 Boric Acid storage Tanks (BAST) and be able to pump Unit 2 BAST to Unit 1 BAST to meet Tech Spec requirements on Unit 1. | ||
' MONTH: -JUNE 1992 | The Technical Specifications dealing with required boration flowpath were reviewed. The flowpath is from the Boric Acid Storage Tank (BAST) to the Boric Acid Transfer Pump (BATP) to the Reactor Coolant System (RCS), or Refueling Water Storage | ||
10CFR50-.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 | |||
' MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd) | |||
-----------~--------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Tank (RWST) to a Charging Pump to the RCS. In Mode 5, only 1 flowpath is required. | |||
Unit 1 and Unit 2 are both in Mode 5 and are using the flowpath from the RWST as the required flowpath. | Tank (RWST) to a Charging Pump to the RCS. In Mode 5, only 1 flowpath is required. Unit 1 and Unit 2 are both in Mode 5 and are using the flowpath from the RWST as the required flowpath. | ||
The BAST and BATP are not required in Mode 5 if the RWST is lined up for injection. | The BAST and BATP are not required in Mode 5 if the RWST is lined up for injection. This TMOD will not impair this flowpath from the RWST. | ||
This TMOD will not impair this flowpath from the RWST. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-068) D. Deficiency Reports (DR) -"Use-As-Is" DR SMD 92-643 "Repair of lPS-28 11 -The purpose of this 'DR is.to evaluate taking a 15 mils skim cut on the stem of 1PS28, some indications still remain in back seat area. Since the correct stem is not available to meet the outage schedule, this DR and safety evaluation accepts use-as-is disposition for 1 cycle. It will be replaced with a new correct stem during lRll. Use of P2R spray (1P53) or its isolation by 1PS28 is evaluated here. This activity, by itself, does not introduce a failure mode of the stem or reduce the margin of safety since the stem is usually designed with a factor of safety greater than 2, the 20 mil diameter reduction is acceptable. | There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-068) | ||
Additionally, the threaded section of the stem is minimum diameter reduced by depth of thread which is approximately 160 mils. Therefore, a skim cut of 20 mils in the area of packing is acceptable with no reduction in margin of safety as provided by original component design. (SORC 92-066) | D. Deficiency Reports (DR) - "Use-As-Is" DR SMD 92-643 "Repair of lPS-28 11 - The purpose of this 'DR is.to evaluate taking a 15 mils skim cut on the stem of 1PS28, some indications still remain in back seat area. Since the correct stem is not available to meet the outage schedule, this DR and safety evaluation accepts use-as-is disposition for 1 cycle. It will be replaced with a new correct stem during lRll. Use of P2R spray (1P53) or its isolation by 1PS28 is evaluated here. This activity, by itself, does not introduce a failure mode of the stem or reduce the margin of safety since the stem is usually designed with a factor of safety greater than 2, the 20 mil diameter reduction is acceptable. Additionally, the threaded section of the stem is minimum diameter reduced by depth of thread which is approximately 160 mils. Therefore, a skim cut of 20 mils in the area of packing is acceptable with no reduction in margin of safety as provided by original component design. (SORC 92-066) | ||
SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
-UNIT 1 JUNE 1992 The Unit was shutdown for the entire period for the 10th Refueling Outage. | - UNIT 1 JUNE 1992 SALEM UNIT NO. 1 The Unit was shutdown for the entire period for the 10th Refueling Outage. | ||
REFUELING INFORMATION MONTH: -JUNE 1992 | |||
: 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES X NO | REFUELING INFORMATION e | ||
OCTOBER 2, 1993 | DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 MONTH JUNE 1992 | ||
: 3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling: | : 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: | ||
DECEMBER 13. 1993 4. a) Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?: | YES X NO _ _ __ | ||
YES NO | : 2. Scheduled date for next refueling: OCTOBER 2, 1993 | ||
YES x NO | : 3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling: DECEMBER 13. 1993 | ||
: 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: N/A 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | : 4. a) Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?: | ||
YES NO _ _ __ | |||
NOT DETERMINED TO DATE -=x__ | |||
b) Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?: | |||
YES x NO _ _ __ | |||
If no, when is it scheduled?: | |||
: 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: | |||
N/A | |||
: 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | |||
: 7. Number of Fuel Assemblies: | : 7. Number of Fuel Assemblies: | ||
: a. Incore 193 b. In Spent Fuel Storage 656 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: | : a. Incore 193 | ||
1170 Future spent fuel storage capacity: | : b. In Spent Fuel Storage 656 | ||
: 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1170 Future spent fuel storage capacity: 1170 | |||
September 2001 8-l-7.R4}} | : 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: September 2001 8-l-7.R4}} | ||
Revision as of 10:15, 21 October 2019
| ML18096A836 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1992 |
| From: | Fest J, Shedlock M, Vondra C Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9207200338 | |
| Download: ML18096A836 (16) | |
Text
'I e
PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station July 14, 1992 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Dear Sir:
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEM NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of June 1992 are being sent to you.
Average Daily Unit Power Level Operating Data Report Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions Safety Related Maintenance lOCFR50.59 Evaluations Operating Summary Refueling Information RH:pc cc: Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 Enclosures*
8-1-7.R4
__Ihe_EIJ_e_r_qy_peqi:>le 9207200338 920630 PDR ADOCK 05000272 95-2189 (10M) 12-89 R PDR
.,
AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Docket No.: 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 07/10/92 Completed by: Mark Shedlock Telephone: 339-2122 Month June 1992 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31-16 0 P. 8.1-7 R1
.
OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No: 50-272 Date: 07/10/92 Completed by: Mark Shedlock Telephone: 339-2122 Operating Status
- 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes
- 2. Reporting Period June 1992
- 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411
- 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170
- 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115
- 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149
- 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106
- 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason NA
- 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) N/A
- 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any ~~~~~~-N""""""=A.__~~~~~~~~~~~
This Month Year to Date Cumulative
- 11. Hours in Reporting Period 720 4367 131520
- 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 0 2256.2 85856.4
- 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0
- 14. Hours Generator On-Line 0 2117.8 83165.7
- 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0
- 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 0 7203120.0 262700265.2*
- 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 0 2416240 87220870
- 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) -3331 2305872 83082445
- 19. Unit Service Factor 0 48.5 . 63. 2
- 20. Unit Availability Factor 0 48.5 63.2
- 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 0 47.7 57.1
- 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 0 47.4 56.7
- 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 100 8.1 21.0
- 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each)
We are presently in a forced maintenance outage.
- 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup:
July 28.1992 8-l-7.R2
UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH JUNE 1992 DOCKET NO.: -'5=0=--=2n'-=----
UNIT NAME: Salem #1 DATE: 07/10/92 COMPLETED BY: Mark Shedlock TELEPHONE: 339-2122 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DURATION DOWN EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION NO. DATE TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 6 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE -
0016 06/01/92 s 672.0 c 4 ------------ RC FUELXX NUCLEAR NORMAL REFUELING 0017 06/29/92 F 48.0 B 4 CH PIPEXX STEAM GEN. PIPING REPAIRS 1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - Same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refuel ing 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of CNUREG-0161)
E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain)
SAFETY RELATED MAINTENANCE DOCKET NO: 50-272
. MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339.;...2904 WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 890429014 1 lB REACTOR TRIP BYPASS BREAKER FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE THE UNDERVOLTAGE TRIP DEVICE 890429016 1 lA REACTOR TRIP BYPASS BREAKER FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE THE UNDERVOLTAGE TRIP DEVICE 910320151 1 FLUX THIMBLES FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE 6 UNIT 1 FLUX THIMBLES 910718114 1 VALVE 11SW40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE HAS NO CLOSED INDICATION -
TROUBLESHOOT 910724130 1 VALVE 16SW15 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE IS LEAKING THOUGH, INSPECT AND REPAIR 911118119 1 SOLENOID VALVE 1SV263 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1SV263 HAS LEAKING TUBING -
REWORK 911226077 1 VALVE 1SW175 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1SW175 HAS NO CLOSED INDICATION - INVESTIGATE 920123168 1 SPOOL RD-1-SW-112 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: SPOOL RD-1-SW-112 UT EXAMINATION UNSAT - FABRICATE AND INSTALL REPLACEMENT SPOOL 920201007 1 VALVE 1PR15 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1PR15 - REPLACE DIAPHRAGM 920218126 1 VALVE 1PR2 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1PR2/PZR PORV - REPLACE COVER PLATE AND DIAPHRAGM
- e SAFETY RELATED MAINTENANCE DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST (cont'd) TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 920405078 1 SPOOL 1-SW-P-1108 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: SPOOL 1-SW-P-1108 HAS A THROUGH WALL LEAK - REPAIR 920415158 1 VALVE 1SS49 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 12249 FAILED LEAK RATE TEST
~ OPEN, INSPECT AND REPAIR 920420109 1 CRDM CABLES FAILURE DESCRIPTION: UNIT 1 CRDM CABLE PROBLEMS FOUND DURING REACTOR DISASSEMBLY -
REPAIR 920421149 1 VALVE 1CV4 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1CV4 FAILED LRT/STROKE -
TROUBLESHOOT 920424091 1 13 SWITCHGEAR RM SUPPLY FAN FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 13 SWITCHGEAR ROOM SUPPLY FAN STARTS - WON'T STOP - INVESTIGATE 920504115 1 VALVE 11SW21 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 11SW21 HAS NO CLOSED INDICATION - TROUBLESHOOT 920511088 1 VALVE 1SJ68 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1SJ68 GREASE UNSAT - REFURBISH OPERATOR 920511098 1 VALVE 1SJ40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 11SJ40 GREASE UNSAT - REFURBISH OPERATOR 920511099 1 VALVE 11RH29 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 11RH9 GREASE UNSAT - REFURBISH OPERATOR
SAFETY RELATED MAINTENANCE DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST (cont'd) TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904
~-----------------------------~------------------------
WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 920522157 1 1 AUX ANNUNCIATOR FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1 AUX ANNUNCIATOR DID NOT ALARM -
TROUBLESHOOT & REWORK 920525016 1 lA REACTOR TRIP BREAKER FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE THE UNDERVOLTAGE TRIP DEVICE 920530125 1 lA D/G OUTPUT BREAKER FAILURE DESCRIPTION: lA D/G OUTPUT BREAKER SPRINGS NOT CHARGING - TROUBLESHOOT 920607088 1 VALVE 1CV277 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1CV277 BLOWN DIAPHRAGM - REPAIR 920610098 *1 13 CHARGING PUMP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 13 CHARGING SUCTION STABILIZER BLADDER LEAKS - REPLACE 920611212 1 VALVE 1CV41 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: SIMULTANEOUS OPEN & CLOSED LIGHTS WITH VALVE IN CLOSED POSITION -
INVESTIGATE 920613059 1 VALVE 1PR6 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: INSPECT AND TROUBLESHOOT THE 1PR6 OPERATOR 920615207 1 VALVE 1CC131 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1CC131 HAS YOKE MOVEMENT -
REWORK AS REQUIRED 920617158 1 VALVE 13SW72 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 13SW72 JAMMED - OPEN, INSPECT &
REPAIR
~----------------------------------------
MONTH: - JUNE 1992
- SAFETY RELATED MAINTENANCE DOCKET NO:
UNIT NAME:
DATE:
50-272 SALEM 1 JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST (cont'd) TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 920618108 1 VALVE 1SS64 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 1SS64 HAS NO OPEN INDICATION -
INVESTIGATE & REPAIR 920620085 1 VALVE 12CV104 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 12CV104 WILL NOT OPEN -
INVESTIGATE 920625090 1 12 CHILLER COMPRESSOR FAILURE DESCRIPTION: 12 CHILLER COMPRESSOR WILL NOT START - TROUBLESHOOT & REPAIR 920627058 1 VALVE 1CC18 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE 1CC18 FAILED STROKE TIME -
INVESTIGATE 920006026 1 VALVE 1PR7 CABLES FAILURE DESCRIPTION: REPLACE 1PR7 CONTROL AND POWER CABLES
10CFR50~59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272
. MONTH: - JUNE 1992 .UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.
ITEM
SUMMARY
A. Design Change Packages (DCP)
DCP# lEC-3138 Pkg. 1 "Radwaste Panel Upgrade" - This DCP will provide for revitalization upgrades to Rad Waste Panel 104 and related equipment on elevations 84' and 64' of the Auxiliary Building. The upgrades will consist of the following: a) replacement of the obsolete instrumentation, b) physical repair of Panel 104, c) provision of new labels to enhance operator interface with this panel, d) removal of unused components, including associated components external to the panel, e) upgrade of panel wire, cable restraints and labels, and f) functional verification of all panel instruments and components. Replacement of certain components used to monitor the administratively controlled transfer and release of radiological liquids and gasses will not affect the limiting conditions or safety margins as described in the Technical Specifications. (SORC 92-065)
DCP # lEA-1030 Pkg. 1 "Replacement of 1CC924 Mark #D-2 with Mark #D-65 11
- The purpose of this design change is to revise the appropriate documentation to change valve 1CC94 from a mark no. D-2 to a mark no. D-65.
This is a Component Cooling drain valve located in the no. 12 cc Heat Exchanger Room, which had been replaced under WO 881010102. The replacement of a non-nuclear valve with a nuclear class 3 valve ensures the integrity of the system. Installing the valves properly with a Code Job Package and performing the NDE ensures the integrity of the pressure boundary. This does not change the function of the system and does not impact the requirement of having two independent trains.
Therefore, this change will not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 92-067)
10CFR50~59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd)
ITEM
SUMMARY
DCP# lEC-3155 Pkg. 1 "Circulating Water Screen Wash Strainer Breaker" -
The purpose of this change is to change the type and rating of the four circuit breakers that control the branch circuits used to feed No. 11, 12, 13, and 14 screen wash strainers. These circuit breakers are located at the 6A20, 6A22, 6A9 and 6A10 positions in the No. 11 Circulating Water Intake 230V Control Center Sect, No. 1 (located in CWI Control House #1). The change is to GE type TED 15 amp circuit breakers. This DCP does not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification because the change in screen wash pump strainer circuit breakers will not affect any of the operating limits necessary to protect the fission barriers inherent in the plant's design. (SORC 92-069)
B. Procedures and Revisions SC.SA-AP.ZZ-0012(Q) "Technical Specification Surveillance Program Matrix" Rev. 16 - This proposal involves a revision to station Administrative Procedure, SC.SA-AP.ZZ-0012(Q), Technical Specification Surveillance Program. The responsibility for performing Appendix "B" surveillance number 4.2.1 (Unit 1 & 2) has been changed from Licensing and Regulation to Chemistry/ Licensing and Regulation.. This revision to the procedure does not change any previously analyzed testing requirement nor does it change any testing method, therefore the proposal cannot reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-064)
TSl.OP-SO.AF-OOOl(Q) "Auxiliary Feedwater System Operation" - The No.
13 Auxiliary .Feedwater Pump (AFWP) recirculation line was cut by mistake in order to allow the Maintenance Department to ~ebuild the 13 AFWP turbine. This line is open ended back to the_ tank so there is no way to isolate the line to repair it by welding the pipe back together. This temporary procedure will allow the Operations Department to drain the contents of the Unit 1 Auxiliary Feed Water Storage Tank by filling the steam generators using the motor driven AFWP. The
10CFR50;59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272
. MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE:* JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd)
ITEM
SUMMARY
pumps are required to be operable in Modes 1, 2 and 3, however, they are not required to be operable in Modes 4, 5 and 6. The basis for these operability requirements is to be able to cool the plant down to less than 350°F from normal operating conditions even in the event of a loss of offsite power. When the plant is in Modes 5 or 6, the Reactor Coolant System temperature is less than 350°F and is being cooled by the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System, so the basis for the Auxiliary Feed Technical Specifications does not apply. This temporary procedure does not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis of Technical Specification 3.7.1.2 because the plant can be maintained in a safe shutdown condition by the RHR system and auxiliary feed is not required. (SORC 92-064)
SCPl Rev. 3 "L.oss or Degradation of Physical Security System"
- This procedure has been revised to incorporate the changed reference to security contingency event reporting pursuant to revised NRC guidance.
The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection.between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067)
SCP2 Rev. 3 "Loss of Security Computer Power" - This procedure has been revised to incorporate the changed reference to security contingency event reporting pursuant to revised NRC guidance and to include Operations under the responsibilities section (for restoration of power). The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR.
There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification.
(SORC 92-067)
10CFR50~59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272
. MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME:* SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd)
ITEM
SUMMARY
SCP5 Rev. 3 "Security Threat" - The procedure has been revised to add extortion to the threat profile. A sentence is added on security force job knowledge, self control, and professionalism, particularly under stress, as contributing to the perception and reality of a secure work place. The systematic method of searching for destructive devices is changed to be compatible with current training methods. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR.
There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification.
(SORC 92-067)
SCP6 Rev. 3 "Discovery of Intruders or Attack" - The procedure for initial rapid deployment and follow up actions in response to a confirmed intrusion has been revised. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067).
SCPlO Rev. 3 "Discovery of Destructive Devices or Evidence of Malicious Acts" - The revision changes assignments for making required nptif ications of the onset of the event, to reduce the burden on alarm station personnel during initial response. New emphasis is added on searching for additional devices and malicious acts, regardless of what caused the event to be declared. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR.
There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification.
(SORC 92-067)
10C"FR50.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd)
ITEM
SUMMARY
SCP12 Rev. 3 "Security Alert" - The procedure has been revised to expand the discussion of possible basis for declaring a Security Alert and to add direction concerning use of defensive positions. The procedure also contains editorial changes which do not alter the procedure's intent or implementation. There is no security related accident analysis in the SAR. There is no connection between this procedure and any plant system. Therefore, there is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-067)
C. Temporary Modifications TMR# 92-037 "Monitoring Temperatures at Different Locations Inside the Pressurizer Enclosure" - ~he pressurizer insulation was replaced with NUKON fiberglass type insulation, to reduce the temperature inside the pressurizer enclosure.
This temporary modification proposes to monitor the temperature inside the pressurizer enclosure.
The results will be used to evaluate the efficiency of the fiberglass insulation, determine the qualified life of cables inside the enclosure, and provide reliable means of evaluating heat stress conditions inside the pressurizer enclosure. The temperature monitoring device does not perform any safety related function and does not affect any safety related system required for the safe shutdown of the Salem Unit. There is no reduction to the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification.
(SORC 92-065)
TMR# 92-039 Rev. 1 "Transfer Unit 2 BAST to Unit 1 BAST" - The purpose of this temporary modification is to cross connect Unit 1 and Unit 2 Boric Acid storage Tanks (BAST) and be able to pump Unit 2 BAST to Unit 1 BAST to meet Tech Spec requirements on Unit 1.
The Technical Specifications dealing with required boration flowpath were reviewed. The flowpath is from the Boric Acid Storage Tank (BAST) to the Boric Acid Transfer Pump (BATP) to the Reactor Coolant System (RCS), or Refueling Water Storage
10CFR50-.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272
' MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 (cont'd)
~---------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM
SUMMARY
Tank (RWST) to a Charging Pump to the RCS. In Mode 5, only 1 flowpath is required. Unit 1 and Unit 2 are both in Mode 5 and are using the flowpath from the RWST as the required flowpath.
The BAST and BATP are not required in Mode 5 if the RWST is lined up for injection. This TMOD will not impair this flowpath from the RWST.
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 92-068)
D. Deficiency Reports (DR) - "Use-As-Is" DR SMD 92-643 "Repair of lPS-28 11 - The purpose of this 'DR is.to evaluate taking a 15 mils skim cut on the stem of 1PS28, some indications still remain in back seat area. Since the correct stem is not available to meet the outage schedule, this DR and safety evaluation accepts use-as-is disposition for 1 cycle. It will be replaced with a new correct stem during lRll. Use of P2R spray (1P53) or its isolation by 1PS28 is evaluated here. This activity, by itself, does not introduce a failure mode of the stem or reduce the margin of safety since the stem is usually designed with a factor of safety greater than 2, the 20 mil diameter reduction is acceptable. Additionally, the threaded section of the stem is minimum diameter reduced by depth of thread which is approximately 160 mils. Therefore, a skim cut of 20 mils in the area of packing is acceptable with no reduction in margin of safety as provided by original component design. (SORC 92-066)
SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING
SUMMARY
- UNIT 1 JUNE 1992 SALEM UNIT NO. 1 The Unit was shutdown for the entire period for the 10th Refueling Outage.
REFUELING INFORMATION e
DOCKET NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JUNE 1992 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: JULY 10, 1992 COMPLETED BY: J. FEST TELEPHONE: (609)339-2904 MONTH JUNE 1992
- 1. Refueling information has changed from last month:
YES X NO _ _ __
- 2. Scheduled date for next refueling: OCTOBER 2, 1993
- 3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling: DECEMBER 13. 1993
- 4. a) Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?:
YES NO _ _ __
NOT DETERMINED TO DATE -=x__
b) Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?:
YES x NO _ _ __
If no, when is it scheduled?:
- 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action:
N/A
- 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
- 7. Number of Fuel Assemblies:
- a. Incore 193
- b. In Spent Fuel Storage 656
- 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1170 Future spent fuel storage capacity: 1170
- 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: September 2001 8-l-7.R4