ML103620556: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML103620556 | | number = ML103620556 | ||
| issue date = 12/28/2010 | | issue date = 12/28/2010 | ||
| title = | | title = Request for Additional Information, Relief Request RR-ENG-3-02 (TAC Nos. ME4764, ME4765) | ||
| author name = Thadani M C | | author name = Thadani M C | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided by STP Nuclear Operating Company for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2, in its letter dated September 20, 2010, and has determined that additional information is necessary to complete the review of Relief Request RR-ENG-3-02. Based on the staff | The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided by STP Nuclear Operating Company for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2, in its letter dated September 20, 2010, and has determined that additional information is necessary to complete the review of Relief Request RR-ENG-3-02. Based on the staff | ||
=s review, please address the following questions. | =s review, please address the following questions. | ||
: 1. Please provide the start and end dates of the third 10-year inservice inspection interval for STP Units 1 and 2. | : 1. Please provide the start and end dates of the third 10-year inservice inspection interval for STP Units 1 and 2. | ||
: 2. Section E of RR-ENG-3-02 states that the "straight beam ultrasonic examination procedure has been demonstrated to ensure examination adequacy." Please provide a detailed description of this demonstration, including mockups/samples used, method(s) demonstrated, and results. | : 2. Section E of RR-ENG-3-02 states that the "straight beam ultrasonic examination procedure has been demonstrated to ensure examination adequacy." Please provide a detailed description of this demonstration, including mockups/samples used, method(s) demonstrated, and results. | ||
: 3. What flaws are expected in these components? Unless addressed in response to question 2 above, please address whether the mockups used in the demonstration of the UT technique contained flaws representative of those found inservice. | : 3. What flaws are expected in these components? Unless addressed in response to question 2 above, please address whether the mockups used in the demonstration of the UT technique contained flaws representative of those found inservice. | ||
: 4. The illustration of the Roto-lok flange insert provided in RR-ENG-3-02 is not sufficient for understanding the Code-required examination surface as well as what is going to be examined with UT in lieu of VT. Please provide additional illustrations to clarify the Code required VT and proposed UT examination. | : 4. The illustration of the Roto-lok flange insert provided in RR-ENG-3-02 is not sufficient for understanding the Code-required examination surface as well as what is going to be examined with UT in lieu of VT. Please provide additional illustrations to clarify the Code required VT and proposed UT examination. | ||
: 5. How many Roto-Lok flange inserts are on each reactor vessel?}} | : 5. How many Roto-Lok flange inserts are on each reactor vessel?}} | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 30 April 2019
| ML103620556 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 12/28/2010 |
| From: | Thadani M C Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Harrison A, Walker P South Texas |
| Thadani, M C, NRR/DORL/LP4, 415-1476 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML103620550 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC ME4764, TAC ME4765 | |
| Download: ML103620556 (1) | |
Text
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 3 RD 10-YEAR INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST RR-ENG-3-02 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 STP NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY DOCKET NUMBERS 50-498 AND 50-499
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided by STP Nuclear Operating Company for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2, in its letter dated September 20, 2010, and has determined that additional information is necessary to complete the review of Relief Request RR-ENG-3-02. Based on the staff
=s review, please address the following questions.
- 1. Please provide the start and end dates of the third 10-year inservice inspection interval for STP Units 1 and 2.
- 2. Section E of RR-ENG-3-02 states that the "straight beam ultrasonic examination procedure has been demonstrated to ensure examination adequacy." Please provide a detailed description of this demonstration, including mockups/samples used, method(s) demonstrated, and results.
- 3. What flaws are expected in these components? Unless addressed in response to question 2 above, please address whether the mockups used in the demonstration of the UT technique contained flaws representative of those found inservice.
- 4. The illustration of the Roto-lok flange insert provided in RR-ENG-3-02 is not sufficient for understanding the Code-required examination surface as well as what is going to be examined with UT in lieu of VT. Please provide additional illustrations to clarify the Code required VT and proposed UT examination.
- 5. How many Roto-Lok flange inserts are on each reactor vessel?