ML053540003

License Amendment, Issuance of Amendments Regarding Eliminate Out-Of-Date Requirements for Keowee Hydro Units, MC7318, MC7319, MC7320

ML053540003
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	07/11/2006
From:	Olshan L NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLC
To:	Rosalyn Jones Duke Energy Corp, Duke Power Co
Cotton K R, NRR/DLPM, 301-415-1438
Shared Package
ML053540004	List: ML053540003 ML061920588
References
TAC MC7318, TAC MC7319, TAC MC7320
Download: ML053540003 (12)

Text

July 11, 2006Mr. Bruce H. HamiltonVice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company LLC 7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3, ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS REGARDING KEOWEE REFURBISHMENT MODIFICATIONS (TAC NOS. MC7318, MC7319, AND MC7320)

Dear Mr. Hamilton:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment Nos. 353, 355, and354 to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55, for the OconeeNuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your application dated June 15, 2005. These amendments propose to eliminate the out-of-date requirements associated with thecompletion of the Keowee refurbishment modifications on both Keowee Hydro Units.A copy of the related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. A Notice of Issuance will be incl udedin the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice. Sincerely,/RA/Leonard N. Olshan, Sr. Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 353 to DPR-38

2. Amendment No. 355 to DPR-47

3. Amendment No. 354 to DPR-55

4. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls: See next page July 11, 2006Mr. Bruce H. HamiltonVice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company LLC 7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3, ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS REGARDING KEOWEE REFURBISHMENT MODIFICATIONS (TAC NOS. MC7318, MC7319, AND MC7320)

Dear Mr. Hamilton:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment Nos. 353, 355, and354 to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55, for the OconeeNuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your application dated June 15, 2005. These amendments propose to eliminate the out-of-date requirements associated with thecompletion of the Keowee refurbishment modifications on both Keowee Hydro Units.A copy of the related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. A Notice of Issuance will be incl udedin the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice. Sincerely,/RA/Leonard N. Olshan, Sr. Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 353 to DPR-38

2. Amendment No. 355 to DPR-47

3. Amendment No. 354 to DPR-55

4. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls: See next pageDISTRIBUTION:

PublicRidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsOgcRpLPL2-1 R/FGHill(6 hard copies)JLee, NRRRidsNrrDorlLplcEMarinosRidsNrrDirsItsb(TBoyce)EForest, NRRRidsNrrPMLOlshan(hard copy)BSingal(DorlDpr)LBrown, NRRRidsNrrLAMO'Brien(hard copy)RidsRgn2MailCenter(MErnstes)Package No. ML053540004Tech Spec No. ML061920588Amendment No. ML053540003*No Legal Objection NRR-058OFFICENRR/LPL2-1/PENRR/LPL2-1/PMNRR/LPL2-1/LAOGCNRR/IROBNRR/LPL2-1/BCNAMEKCottonLOlshanMO'BrienSHamrick*TBoyceEMarinosDATE 6/ /06 6/15/06 6/15/06 6/28/06 2/24/067/5/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DUKE POWER COMPANY LLCDOCKET NO. 50-269OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 353Renewed License No. DPR-381.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment to the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (thefacility) Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-38 filed by the Duke PowerCompany LLC (the licensee) dated June 15, 2005, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations as set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; and E.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is hereby amended by page changes to the TechnicalSpecifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and Paragraph 3.B of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-38 is hereby amended to read asfollows:B.Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised throughAmendment No. 353, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications. 3.This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implementedwithin 30 days of issuance. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/Evangelos C. Marinos, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-38 and the Technical Specifications

Date of Issuance: July 11, 2006 DUKE POWER COMPANY LLCDOCKET NO. 50-270OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 355Renewed License No. DPR-471.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment to the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 2 (thefacility) Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-47 filed by the Duke PowerCompany LLC (the licensee) dated June 15, 2005, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations as set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; and E.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is hereby amended by page changes to the TechnicalSpecifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and Paragraph 3.B of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-47 is hereby amended to read asfollows:B.Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised throughAmendment No. 355, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications. 3.This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implementedwithin 30 days of issuance.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/Evangelos C. Marinos, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-47 and the Technical Specifications

Date of Issuance: July 11, 2006 DUKE POWER COMPANY LLCDOCKET NO. 50-287OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 3AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 354Renewed License No. DPR-551.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment to the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3 (thefacility) Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-55 filed by the DukePower Company LLC (the licensee) dated June 15, 2005, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations as set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defenseand security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is hereby amended by page changes to the TechnicalSpecifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and Paragraph 3.B of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-55 is hereby amended to read asfollows:B.Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised throughAmendment No. 354, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications. 3.This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implementedwithin 30 days of issuance.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/Evangelos C. Marinos, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-55 and the Technical Specifications

Date of Issuance: July 11, 2006 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 353RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-38DOCKET NO. 50-269ANDTO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 355RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-47DOCKET NO. 50-270ANDTO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 354RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-55DOCKET NO. 50-287Replace the following pages of the Licenses and the Appendix A Technical Specifications (TSs)with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change. Remove PagesInsert Pages LicensesLicensesLicense No. DPR-38License No. DPR-38 pages 3 and 8pages 3 and 8 License No. DPR-47License No. DPR-47 pages 3 and 8pages 3 and 8 License No. DPR-55License No. DPR-55 pages 3 and 8pages 3 and 8TSsTSs3.8.1-43.8.1-43.8.1-53.8.1-5 3.8.1-63.8.1-6 3.8.1-73.8.1-7 3.8.1-83.8.1-8 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONRELATED TOAMENDMENT NO. 353 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE DPR-38AMENDMENT NO. 355 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE DPR-47 ANDAMENDMENT NO. 354 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE DPR-55DUKE POWER COMPANY LLCOCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3DOCKET NOS. 50-269, 50-270, AND 50-28

71.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated June 15, 2005 (AgencywideDocuments Access Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML051730442). Duke Power Company LLC (Duke) submitted a request for changes to the Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Oconee), Licenses and Technical Specifications (TSs). The requested changes would eliminate the out-of-date requirements associated with the completion of theKeowee refurbishment modifications on both Keowee Hydro Units (KHUs). The Notes that allow extension to the Completions Times (CTs) for Required Actions (RAs) C.2.2.5, D.3, and H.2 are out of date. The Notes that allow exception to RAs C.2.2.3 and C.2.2.4 are no longerapplicable. In addition, License Condition 3.H of Facility Operating Licenses (FOLs) DPR-38,DPR-47, and DPR-55 for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, is no longer needed sincethe associated Technical Specification (TS) is no longer applicable.The NRC issued Amendment Nos. 339, 341, and 340, respectively, on August 5, 2004. Theamendments revised TS 3.8.1, "AC Sources - Operating," to temporarily extend the completiontimes (CTs) for restoring inoperable KHUs to allow additional time for significant maintenance and upgrades. This work included the replacement of the governor, exciters, batteries, and weld repair on the turbine blades and discharge ring along with draft tube concrete repair. An out of tolerance logic modification was also implemented. This work was performed on each KHU in separate Keowee Refurbishment Outages. Also, as a part of that amendment, License Condition 3.H was added to require Duke to comply with commitments associated with that change.With the completion of the KHU-2 Refurbishment Outage on February 11, 2005, both KeoweeRefurbishment Outages have been completed. As such, the TS change allowed by Amendment Nos. 339, 341, and 340 is no longer applicable. In addition, the license condition associated with that change is no longer needed and can be removed.

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

In Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Section 50.36, the NRC established its regulatory requirements related to the content of the TSs. Pursuant to10 CFR 50.36, TSs are required to include items in the following five specific categories:

(1) safety limits, limiting safety system settings, and limiting control settings; (2) limitingconditions for operation (LCOs); (3) surveillance requirements; (4) design features; and (5)administrative controls. The regulation does not specify the particular requirements to be included in a plant's TSs. On July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132), the Commission published a "Final Policy Statement onTechnical Specifications Improvements for Nuclear Power Reactors" (Final Policy Statement) which discussed the criteria to determine which items are required to be included in the TSs as LCOs. The criteria were subsequently incorporated into the regulations (60 FR 36953).

Specifically, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii) requires that a TS LCO be established for each item meeting one or more of the following criteria:(A) Criterion.Installed instrumentation that is used to detect, and indicate in thecontrol room, a significant abnormal degradation of the reactor coolant pressure boundary. (B) Criterion.A process variable, design feature, or operating restriction that is aninitial condition of a design basis accident or transient analysis that either assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier. (C) Criterion.A structure, system, or component that is part of the primary successpath and which functions or actuates to mitigate a design basis accident or transient that either assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier. (D) Criterion.A structure, system, or component which operating experience orprobabilistic risk assessment has shown to be significant to publichealth and safety. In general, there are two classes of changes to the TSs: (1) changes needed to reflectmodifications to the design basis (TSs are derived from the design basis), and (2) changes to take advantage of the evolution in policy and guidance as to the required content and preferredformat of TSs over time. In determining the acceptability of such changes, the NRC staffinterprets the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36, using as a model the accumulation of generically approved guidance in the Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS). For this review, the staff used NUREG-1433, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications, General ElectricPlants BWR [boiling-water reactor]/4." Within this general framework, licensees may remove material from their TSs if the material isnot required to be in the TSs based on the NRC staff's interpretation of 10 CFR 50.36, includingjudgements about the level of detail required in the TSs. As discussed in the Final Policy Statement, the NRC staff reviews, on a case-by-case basis, whether enforceable regulatory controls are needed for the relocated material (e.g., 10 CFR 50.59). Licensees may revise theremaining TSs to adopt current ISTS format and content provided that plant-specific reviewsupports a finding of continued adequate safety because: (1) the change is editorial, administrative, or provides clarification (i.e., no requirements are materially altered); (2) the change is more restrictive than the licensee's current requirement; or (3) the change is less restrictive than the licensee's current requirement, but nonetheless still affords adequateassurance of safety when judged against current regulatory standards.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The Licensee stated in its technical evaluation the following:With the completion of the Keowee Refurbishment modifications on both KHUs,the Notes that allow extension to the CTs for RAs C.2.2.5, D.3, and H.2 are outof date. The Notes that allow exception to RAs C.2.2.3 and C.2.2.4 are no longerapplicable. In addition, License Condition 3.H of FOLs DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55 for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, is no longer needed since the associated TS is no longer applicable. Therefore, Duke proposes to eliminate these out of date requirements.The Note to RA C.2.2.3 indicates that the requirements of RA C.2.2.3 are notapplicable to the remaining KHU and its required underground emergency power path or LCO 3.3.21 when in Condition H to perform Keowee Refurbishment Upgrades. Similarly, the Note to RA C.2.2.4 indicates that the requirements of RA C.2.2.4 are not applicable when in Condition H to perform Keowee Refurbishment Upgrades. The Note to the second CT (45 day) of RA C.2.2.5 allows an additional 17 days (62 days total) to restore the KHU associated with the overhead emergency power path for Keowee refurbishment upgrades performed prior to April 30, 2005. With the completion of the Keowee Refurbishment modifications on February 11, 2005, these notes are no longer applicable and can be removed.The Note to the CTs of RA D.3 makes the extended CT of RA H.2 applicable inlieu of the 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> CTs of RA D.3 when in Condition H to isolate, test and un-isolate the KHUs during each of the two KHU Refurbishment Outages. With the completion of the second Keowee Refurbishment Outage on February 11, 2005, this note is no longer applicable and can be removed.The Note to the CT of RA H.2 allows an additional cumulative 120 hours0.00139 days <br />0.0333 hours <br />1.984127e-4 weeks <br />4.566e-5 months <br /> to beapplied to the 60 hour6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> CT twice when entered to isolate, test and un-isolate the KHUs during each Keowee Refurbishment Outage prior to April 30, 2005, provided that a number of compensatory measures are taken prior to entry into the Condition for this reason. With the completion of the second Keowee Refurbishment Outage on February 11, 2005, this note is no longer applicable and can be removed.TS Bases 3.8.1 are revised to reflect the changes described above. License Condition 3.H of each FOL states: "Duke shall comply with the commitments ofAttachment 2 to letter date July 29, 2004, associated with TS 2002-05." This license condition is no longer needed since the associated TS change is no longer applicable. Therefore, License Condition 3.H should be removed.Since the TSs and FOLs changes described above involve only the removal of TSs or LicenseConditions that are no longer applicable, the proposed changes are administrative. Therefore,the NRC staff finds the proposed changes to the Oconee TSs acceptable.

4.0STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the South Carolina State official was notifiedof the proposed issuance of the amendments. The State official had no comments.

5.0ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendments change requirements with respect to installation or use of a facilitycomponent located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff hasdetermined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts and nosignificant change in the types of any effluents that may be released offsite and that there is nosignificant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (71 FR 26998). Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categoricalexclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.

6.0CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) thereis reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered byoperation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to thecommon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.Principal Contributor: K. Cotton Date: July 11, 2006 Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 cc:

Ms. Lisa F. VaughnDuke Power Company LLC 526 South Church Street P. O. Box 1006 Mail Code EC07H Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006Manager, LISNUS Corporation 2650 McCormick Dr., 3rd Floor Clearwater, FL 34619-1035Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7812B Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672Mr. Henry Porter, DirectorDivision of Radioactive Waste Management Bureau of Land and Waste Management Dept. of Health and Env. Control 2600 Bull St.

Columbia, SC 29201-1708Mr. Michael A. SchoppmanFramatome ANP 1911 North Ft. Myer Dr.

Suite 705 Rosslyn, VA 22209Mr. B. G. DavenportRegulatory Compliance Manager Oconee Nuclear Site Duke Power Company LLC ON03RC 7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672Mr. Leonard G. GreenAssistant Attorney General NC Department of Justice

P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602Mr. R. L. Gill, Jr.Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Issues and Industry Affairs Duke Power Company LLC 526 S. Church St.

Mail Stop EC05P Charlotte, NC 28202Division of Radiation ProtectionNC Dept of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources 3825 Barrett Dr.

Raleigh, NC 27609-7721Mr. Peter R. Harden, IVVP-Customer Relations and Sales Westinghouse Electric Company 6000 Fairview Road 12th Floor Charlotte, NC 28210Mr. Henry BarronGroup Vice President, Nuclear Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer P.O. Box 1006-EC07H Charlotte, NC 28201-1006