IR 05000220/2013503

IR 05000220-13-503 and 05000410-13-503, June 17-21, 2013, Nine Mile Point NRC Evaluated Emergency Preparedness Exercise

ML13212A219
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	07/31/2013
From:	Dimitriadis T Plant Support Branch 1
To:	Costanzo C Nine Mile Point
Dimitriadis A
References
IR-13-503
Download: ML13212A219 (11)

Text

July 31, 2013

Mr. Christopher Costanzo, Site Vice President Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093-0063

SUBJECT: NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, LLC - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000220/2013503 AND 05000410/2013503

Dear Mr. Costanzo:

On June 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the June 19, 2013, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise (EP) at your Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station. The enclosed Inspection Report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on June 21, 2013, with you and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of thDocuments Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/ Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-220, 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63, NPF-69 C. Constanzo 2 Enclosure: NRC Inspection Report Nos. 05000220/2013503 and 05000410/2013503 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ R. Thomson, RAC Chair, FEMA, Region II

ML13212A219 SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRS RI/DRP RI/DRS NAME SBarr DSchroeder ADimitriadis DATE 07/31/2013 07/29/2013 07/31/2013 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ R. Thomson, RAC Chair, FEMA, Region II Distribution w/encl: (via E-mail) W. Dean, RA D. Lew, DRA D. Roberts, DRP A. Burritt, DRP R. Lorson, DRS J. Rogge, DRS D. Schroeder, DRP A. Rosebrook, DRP B. Scrabeck, DRP K. Kolaczyk, DRP, SRI E. Miller, DRP, RI V. Campbell, RI OEDO RidsNrrPMNineMilePoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource ROPReports Resource S. Barr, DRS A. Dimitriadis, DRS R. Kahler, NSIR/EPD S. LaVie, NSIR/EPD i Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I Docket No: 50-220, 50-410 License No: DPR-63, NPF-69 Report No: 05000220/2013503 and 05000410/2013503 Licensee: Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC Facility: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Units 1 and 2 Location: Oswego, New York Dates: June 17-21, 2013 Inspectors: S. Barr, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I (Lead) E. Burket, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I J. DeMarshall, Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I S. LaVie, Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist, NSIR Approved By: Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety ii Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000220/2013503, 05000410/2013503; 6/17/2013-6/21/2013; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station; Exercise Evaluation; Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification. This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors and one headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-

A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

No findings were identified. B. Licensee-Identified Findings None.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness (EP) 1EP7 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

On June 19, 2013, Constellation conducted a Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station biennial emergency preparedness exercise. The NRC inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the performance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.===

The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment: The adequacy of Constellations performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are: emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.

The overall adequacy of Constellation emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, the offsite alternative facility, the incident command post, and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).

A review of other performance areas, such as the licenseeERO recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.

A review of past performance issues from the last NRC NMP exercise inspection report and Constellation EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the June 19, 2013, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) -exercise critiques, to evaluate Constellation-assessment of its ERO performance during the June 19, 2013, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified. 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review (71114.08 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the June 19, 2013, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Constellation had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification (71151

3 Samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed data for the NMP EP PIs, which are:

(1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP);

(2) Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation; and,

(3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability. The last EP inspection at NMP was conducted in the third calendar quarter of 2012, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the third calendar quarter of 2012 through the first calendar quarter of 2013, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99- This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, including Exit

On June 21, 2013, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. C. Costanzo, NMP Site Vice President, and other members of the Constellation staff.

The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.

ATTACHMENT

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

C. Costanzo, NMP Site Vice President

A. Verno, NMP Emergency Planning Manager

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

None.

Section 1EP1: Exercise Evaluation

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Site Emergency Plan (Revision 59) Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Nine Mile Point June 19, 2013, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package

CNG-EP-1.01-1006, Drill and Exercise Scheduling and Preparation (Revision 3)

CNG-EP-1.01-1007, Evaluation and Documentation of Drills, Exercises and Classified Events (Revision 1) Nine Mile Point Emergency Preparedness Drill Reports, July 2012

June 2013

Condition Reports

generated from the June 19, 2013, Exercise (As documented in Nine Mile

Point Graded Exercise Evaluation Report

NMP-EP-EX-13-3, dated July 15, 2013)

Section 1EP8: Exercise Evaluation

Scenario Review Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Nine Mile Point June 19, 2013, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package

CNG-EP-1.01-1006, Drill and Exercise Scheduling and Preparation (Revision 1)

Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

CNG-EP-1.01-1001, Emergency Preparedness Program Responsibilities

And Oversight (Revision 1) CNG-

FS-1.01-1000, Key Performance Indicator and Measurement Process (Revision 3)

EPMP-EPP-05, Emergency Planning Self-Assessment (Revision 18) Alert Notification System PI data, July 2012

March 2013 DEP PI data, July 2012

March 2013 ERO Drill Participation PI data, July 2012

March 2013

Attachment

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System

ANS Alert Notification System

AR Action Request

DEP Drill and Exercise Performance

EOF Emergency Operations Facility

EP Emergency Preparedness

ERO Emergency Response Organization

NMP Nine Mile Point

NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission

PAR Protective Action Recommendation

PI Performance Indicator

RSPS Risk Significant Planning Standard