ML12243A144: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/30/2012
| issue date = 08/30/2012
| title = Request to Supplement the 8/21/12 Amendment Request in Order to Complete Acceptance Review Per NRR Office Instruction LIC-109
| title = Request to Supplement the 8/21/12 Amendment Request in Order to Complete Acceptance Review Per NRR Office Instruction LIC-109
| author name = Tam P S
| author name = Tam P
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1
| addressee name = Kissinger P W, Loeffler R
| addressee name = Kissinger P, Loeffler R
| addressee affiliation = Northern States Power Co
| addressee affiliation = Northern States Power Co
| docket = 05000263
| docket = 05000263
| license number = DPR-022
| license number = DPR-022
| contact person = Tam P S
| contact person = Tam P
| case reference number = TAC ME9423
| case reference number = TAC ME9423
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:ME9423
| project = TAC:ME9423
| stage = Supplement
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML12243A144  
{{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML12243A144 From: Tam, Peter Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:09 AM To: 'Loeffler, Richard A.'; 'Kissinger, Peter W.'
 
From: Tam, Peter Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:09 AM To: 'Loeffler, Richard A.'; 'Kissinger, Peter W.'
Cc: Beltz, Terry; Frankl, Istvan  
Cc: Beltz, Terry; Frankl, Istvan  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Monticello - A question on the 8/21/12 application for "clean up" amendment (TAC ME9423)
Monticello - A question on the 8/21/12 application for "clean up" amendment (TAC ME9423)
Rick, Peter:  
Rick, Peter:
 
I am performing an acceptance review, per the guidance of NRR Office Instruction LIC-109, of the licensees 8/21/12 application to clean up the Monticello Renewed OL and appendices. As described below, a piece of information seems to be missing for this application to be found acceptable for review.
I am performing an acceptance review, per the guidance of NRR Office Instruction LIC-109, of the licensee's 8/21/12 application to clean up the Monticello Renewed OL and appendices. As described below, a piece of information seems to be missing for this application to be found acceptable for review.  
Regarding the proposed deletion from TS 5.6.3 of two topical reports, NSPNAD-8608-A and NSPNAD-8609-A, the sole reason given for the deletion (Two analytical methods, no longer utilized for determination of the licensed operating limits, are proposed to be removed.)
 
appears thin. What process (e.g., 10 CFR 50.59, 10 CFR 50.90) was used to determine that these topical reports are no long utilized? Is the continued presence of these two topical reports in TS 5.6.3 simply an inadvertent error from a previous amendment? If the deletion should be reviewed but never reviewed before, then technical justification needs to be provided for the proposed deletion.
Regarding the proposed deletion from TS 5.6.3 of two topical reports, NSPNAD-8608-A and NSPNAD-8609-A, the sole reason given for the deletion ("Two analytical methods, no longer utilized for determination of the licensed operating limits, are proposed to be removed.") appears thin. What process (e.g., 10 CFR 50.59, 10 CFR 50.90) was used to determine that these topical reports are "no long utilized"? Is the continued presence of these two topical reports in TS 5.6.3 simply an inadvertent error from a previous amendment? If the deletion should be reviewed but never reviewed before, then technical justification needs to be provided for the proposed deletion.  
Please respond expeditiously for the NRC staff to complete its acceptance review within the time frame specified by LIC-109.
 
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager (for D.C. Cook and Monticello)
Please respond expeditiously for the NRC staff to complete its acceptance review within the time frame specified by LIC-109.  
Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451}}
 
Peter S. Tam , Senior Project Manager   (for D.C. Cook and Monticello) Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
 
Tel. 301-415-1451}}

Latest revision as of 22:45, 11 January 2025

Request to Supplement the 8/21/12 Amendment Request in Order to Complete Acceptance Review Per NRR Office Instruction LIC-109
ML12243A144
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/30/2012
From: Tam P
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Kissinger P, Loeffler R
Northern States Power Co
Tam P
References
TAC ME9423
Download: ML12243A144 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Accession No. ML12243A144 From: Tam, Peter Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:09 AM To: 'Loeffler, Richard A.'; 'Kissinger, Peter W.'

Cc: Beltz, Terry; Frankl, Istvan

Subject:

Monticello - A question on the 8/21/12 application for "clean up" amendment (TAC ME9423)

Rick, Peter:

I am performing an acceptance review, per the guidance of NRR Office Instruction LIC-109, of the licensees 8/21/12 application to clean up the Monticello Renewed OL and appendices. As described below, a piece of information seems to be missing for this application to be found acceptable for review.

Regarding the proposed deletion from TS 5.6.3 of two topical reports, NSPNAD-8608-A and NSPNAD-8609-A, the sole reason given for the deletion (Two analytical methods, no longer utilized for determination of the licensed operating limits, are proposed to be removed.)

appears thin. What process (e.g., 10 CFR 50.59, 10 CFR 50.90) was used to determine that these topical reports are no long utilized? Is the continued presence of these two topical reports in TS 5.6.3 simply an inadvertent error from a previous amendment? If the deletion should be reviewed but never reviewed before, then technical justification needs to be provided for the proposed deletion.

Please respond expeditiously for the NRC staff to complete its acceptance review within the time frame specified by LIC-109.

Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager (for D.C. Cook and Monticello)

Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12243A144&oldid=5252864"