ML14280A074: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/20/2014
| issue date = 08/20/2014
| title = 2014 DC Cook Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
| title = 2014 DC Cook Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
| author name = McNeil D R
| author name = Mcneil D
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form Quality Checklist 0
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403, Rev. 9                   Written Examination Grading                     Form   ES~403~1 Quality Checklist 0 8/e>.tf./~lt/-
Facility:
Facility: DC Cook U1/U2         Date of Exam: -e8t(Hfl2tH4-*In... Exam Level: RO L2J SRO 0 Initials Item Description a      b        c
DC Cook U1/U2 Date of Exam: -e8t(Hfl2tH4-*In...
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
Exam Level: RO L2J SRO 0 Item Description  
: 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)                                         ~
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as n/a    n/a      n/a applicable, +/-4% on the SRO~only) reviewed in detail
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified  
: 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are n/a    n/a      n/a justified
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed b half or more of the a licants a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions             rJ/tt    ~
n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
missed b half or more of the a licants Date
D. McNeil/ NRC Supervisor(*)
: a. Grader                                                                             08/12/14
H. Peterson a n/a n/a Initials b c n/a n/a n/a n/a rJ/tt Date 08/12/14 __ .n@_ 08/12/14 The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)           n/a                                               __.n@_
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)       D. McNeil/                                             08/12/14 NRC Supervisor(*)           H. Peterson The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}

Latest revision as of 20:25, 31 October 2019

2014 DC Cook Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
ML14280A074
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/2014
From: Mcneil D
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
American Electric Power, Indiana Michigan Power Co
Shared Package
ML13093A427 List:
References
50-315/14-301, 50-316/14-301 50-315/OL-14, 50-316/OL-14
Download: ML14280A074 (1)


Text

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES~403~1 Quality Checklist 0 8/e>.tf./~lt/-

Facility: DC Cook U1/U2 Date of Exam: -e8t(Hfl2tH4-*In... Exam Level: RO L2J SRO 0 Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ~
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as n/a n/a n/a applicable, +/-4% on the SRO~only) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are n/a n/a n/a justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions rJ/tt ~

missed b half or more of the a licants Date

a. Grader 08/12/14
b. Facility Reviewer(*) n/a __.n@_
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) D. McNeil/ 08/12/14 NRC Supervisor(*) H. Peterson The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.