IR 05000073/2014201: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000073
| docket = 05000073
| license number = R-033
| license number = R-033
| contact person = Font O E, DPR/PROB, 415-2490
| contact person = Font O, DPR/PROB, 415-2490
| document report number = IR-14-201
| document report number = IR-14-201
| document type = Inspection Report, Letter
| document type = Inspection Report, Letter
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:July 7, 2014
[[Issue date::July 7, 2014]]


Mr. Thomas Caine Vallecitos Nuclear Center General Electric Company 6705 Vallecitos Road Sunol, CA 94586
==SUBJECT:==
GENERAL ELECTRIC - NRC ROUTINE, ANNOUNCED INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-73/2014-201


SUBJECT:
==Dear Mr. Caine:==
GENERAL ELECTRIC
On June 2-4, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission)
- NRC ROUTINE, ANNOUNCED INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-73/2014-201
conducted a routine, announced inspection at the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) and held a subsequent phone call on June 12, 2014 and a re-exit meeting on June 13, 2014 (Inspection Report No. 50-73/2014-201). The inspection included a review of activities authorized for your facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection.
 
This inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations of activities in progress. Based on the results of this inspection, no safety concern or noncompliance with NRC requirements was identified. No response to this letter is required.
 
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS)). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at (the Public Electronic Reading Room) http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact Ossy Font at 301-415-2490 or by electronic mail at Ossy.Font@nrc.gov.
 
Sincerely,
/RA/


==Dear Mr. Caine:==
Patrick Isaac, Acting Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
On June 2
 
-4, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) conducted a routine, announced inspection at the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) and held a subsequent phone call on June 12, 2014 and a re
Docket No. 50-73 License No. R-33
-exit meeting on [[Exit meeting date::June 13, 2014]] (Inspection Report No. 50
 
-73/2014-201). The inspection included a review of activities authorized for your facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. This inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations of activities in progress. Based on the results of this inspection, no safety concern or noncompliance with NRC requirements was identified. No response to this letter is required.
Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report No. 50-73/2014-201  
 
cc: See next page
 
General Electric
 
Docket No. 50-73
 
cc:
 
Juan Ayala Radiation Safety Officer Vallecitos Nuclear Center General Electric Company 6705 Vallecitos Road Sunol, CA 94586
 
Mr. Dan Thomas Manager NTR Vallecitos Nuclear Center General Electric Company 6705 Vallecitos Road Sunol, CA 94586
 
Mr. Harold Neems General Electric Company Nuclear Energy Business Operations 175 Cutner Avenue Mail Code 123 San Jose, CA 95125
 
Commissioner California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-34 Sacramento, CA 95814
 
California Department of Health ATTN: Chief Radiologic Health Branch P.O. Box 997414, MS 7610 Sacramento, CA 95899-7414
 
Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter P.O. Box 118300 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-8300
 
ML14171A622
 
NRC-002 OFFICE NRR/DPR/PROB/RI NRR/DPR/PROB/BC NAME OFont PIsaac DATE 6/24/2014 7/7/2014


In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding,"
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
a copy of this letter and its enclosure will b e available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC
's document system (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS)). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at (the Public Electronic Reading Room) http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html
. Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact Ossy Font at 301-415-2490 or by electronic mail at Ossy.Font@nrc.gov
.  


Sincerely,/RA/ Patrick Isaac
Docket No:
, Acting Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


Docket No.
50-73


50-73 License No.
License No:


R-33  
R-33  


===Enclosure:===
Report No:  
NRC Inspection Report No. 50-73/2014-201 cc: See next page General Electric Docket No.


50-73 cc: Juan Ayala Radiation Safety Officer Vallecitos Nuclear Center General Electric Company 6705 Vallecitos Road Sunol, CA 94586
50-73/2014-201


Mr. Dan Thomas Manager NTR Vallecitos Nuclear Center General Electric Company 6705 Vallecitos Road Sunol, CA 94586
Licensee:


Mr. Harold Neems General Electric Company Nuclear Energy Business Operations 175 Cutner Avenue Mail Code 123 San Jose, CA 95125 Commissioner California Energy Commission
General Electric Company  


1516 Ninth Street, MS
Facility:  
-34 Sacramento, CA 95814 California Department of Health ATTN: Chief Radiologic Health Branch P.O. Box 997414, MS 7610 Sacramento, CA 95899
-7414 Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter P.O. Box 118300 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611
-8300
: ML14171A622 NRC-002 OFFICE NRR/DPR/PROB/RI NRR/DPR/PROB/
BC NAME OFont PIsaac DATE 6/24/2014 7/7/2014 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Docket No:
50-73 License No:
R-33 Report No: 50-73/2014-201 Licensee:
General Electric Company Facility:
Nuclear Test Reactor (NTR) Location:
Sunol, CA Dates: June 2-4, 2014 Inspector s: Ossy Font Craig Bassett Approved by:
Patrick Isaac, Acting Chief Research and Test Reactor Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemakin g Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center NRC Inspection Report No. 50
Nuclear Test Reactor (NTR)  
-73/2014-201 The primary focus of this routine, announced inspection was the onsite review of selected aspects of the General Electric Company (GE, the licensee) Class II research reactor facility safety programs including: procedures
; experiments
; health physics; design changes; committees, audits and reviews; and transportation.


The licensee
Location:
's programs were acceptably directed toward the protection of public health and safety, and were in compliance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (
NRC) requirements.


Procedures Procedure administrative review, revision, adherence to, and implementation satisfied Technical Specification (TS) requirements.
Sunol, CA


Experiments
Dates:


There were no new experiments since the last inspection. Previous experiment review and approval was done in accordance with TS requirements, licensee procedures, and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.59 regulations.
June 2-4, 2014


Health Physics Periodic surveys were completed and documented as required by procedure.
Inspectors:


Postings and signs met regulatory requirements.
Ossy Font


Personnel dosimetry was being worn as required and recorded doses were within the NRC's regulatory limits.
Craig Bassett


Radiation survey and monitoring equipment was being maintained and calibrated as required.
Approved by:
Patrick Isaac, Acting Chief


The radiation protection training program was acceptable and training was being completed as required.
Research and Test Reactor Oversight Branch


The radiation protection and the as low as reasonably achievable programs satisfied regulatory requirements.
Division of Policy and Rulemaking


Appropriate Radiation Work Permits were in place to provide guidance and precautionary requirements for on
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
-going and emergent work at the facility. Environmental Protection Effluent monitoring satisfied license and regulatory requirements and releases were within the specified regulatory and TS limits.


The environmental protection program satisfied NRC requirements.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Design Changes
General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center NRC Inspection Report No. 50-73/2014-201


Design changes were made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 requirements, TS, and licensee procedures.
The primary focus of this routine, announced inspection was the onsite review of selected aspects of the General Electric Company (GE, the licensee) Class II research reactor facility safety programs including: procedures; experiments; health physics; design changes; committees, audits and reviews; and transportation. The licensees programs were acceptably directed toward the protection of public health and safety, and were in compliance with the U.S.
 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements.
 
Procedures
* Procedure administrative review, revision, adherence to, and implementation satisfied Technical Specification (TS) requirements.
 
Experiments
* There were no new experiments since the last inspection. Previous experiment review and approval was done in accordance with TS requirements, licensee procedures, and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.59 regulations.
 
Health Physics
* Periodic surveys were completed and documented as required by procedure.
* Postings and signs met regulatory requirements.
* Personnel dosimetry was being worn as required and recorded doses were within the NRCs regulatory limits.
* Radiation survey and monitoring equipment was being maintained and calibrated as required.
* The radiation protection training program was acceptable and training was being completed as required.
* The radiation protection and the as low as reasonably achievable programs satisfied regulatory requirements.
* Appropriate Radiation Work Permits were in place to provide guidance and precautionary requirements for on-going and emergent work at the facility.
 
- 2 -
 
Environmental Protection
* Effluent monitoring satisfied license and regulatory requirements and releases were within the specified regulatory and TS limits.
* The environmental protection program satisfied NRC requirements.
 
Design Changes
* Design changes were made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 requirements, TS, and licensee procedures.
 
Committees, Audits, and Reviews
* The Reactor Committee provided the oversight required by the TS.
 
Transportation
* The licensee made no shipments of radioactive material under the auspices of the R-33 license.
 
REPORT DETAILS
 
Summary of Facility Status
 
The General Electric Companys (GE, the licensees) 100 kilowatt research reactor has been operated in support of neutron radiography, reactor operator training, and periodic equipment surveillances. During the inspection the reactor was operated to support radiography operations.
 
1.
 
Procedures
 
a.


Committees, Audits, and Reviews
Inspection Scope (IP 69001)


The Reactor Committee provided the oversight required by the TS. Transportation
The inspectors reviewed the following to ensure that the requirements of Technical Specifications (TS) Section 6.4, Procedures, were being met concerning written procedures:
* Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (various), reviewed December 20-21, 2012
*
Engineering Releases, ER# 12-09 and ER# 12-10


The licensee made no shipments of radioactive material under the auspices of the R-33 license.
b.


REPORT DETAILS Summary of Facility Status The General Electric Company's (GE, the licensee's)
Observations and Findings
100 kilowatt research reactor has been operated in support of neutron radiography, reactor operator training, and periodic equipment surveillances. During the inspection the reactor was operated to support radiography operations
. 1. Procedures a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001
) The inspectors reviewed the following to ensure that the requirements of Technical Specifications (TS)
Section 6.


4, Procedures, were being met concerning written procedures:
Records showed that procedures for TS required items were available. Since the last inspection it was determined that there were no substantive changes to the procedures. The licensee maintained approved procedures to satisfy the requirements of the TS.
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (various),
reviewed December 20-21, 2012 Engineering Releases, ER# 12
-09 and ER# 12
-10 b. Observations and Findings Records showed that procedures for TS required items were available. Since the last inspection it was determined that there were no substantive changes to the procedures. The licensee maintained approved procedures to satisfy the requirements of the TS.


A reactor startup was performed to support several radiography shoots. The startup was performed satisfactorily in accordance with reviewed and approved procedures.
A reactor startup was performed to support several radiography shoots. The startup was performed satisfactorily in accordance with reviewed and approved procedures.


c. Conclusio n Procedure administrative review, revision, adherence to, and implementation satisfied TS requirements.
c.
 
Conclusion
 
Procedure administrative review, revision, adherence to, and implementation satisfied TS requirements.
 
2.
 
Experiments
 
a.
 
Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
 
In order to verify that any modifications to the facility were consistent with TS requirements, procedures, and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.59 regulations, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:
* Annual Reports for License R-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013
 
- 2 -
* Nuclear Test Reactor (NTR) SOP (NTR SOP) #10.1 Experiment Type Approvals (ETAs) for explosive material radiography, various dates
*
NRT Console Log, various dates
 
b.
 
Observations and Findings


2. Experiments a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
The inspectors reviewed the process for the approval and conduct of experiments at the facility; during this inspection there was a specific focus on experiments involving the radiography of explosive material in the south and north cells. The licensee recently implemented a work tracking spreadsheet with the ability to raise flags to notify of any restrictions and limitations thresholds that might be exceeded by the prepared work. The experiments and storage on site were being addressed and in adherence. The inspector determined that the experimental review process and approval for handling and storage of TNT-equivalent explosive material is in accordance with TS and approved procedures.
In order to verify that any modifications to the facility were consistent with TS requirements, procedures, and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.59 regulations, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:
Annual Reports for License R
-33, Docket 50
-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013 Nuclear Test Reactor (NTR) SOP (NTR SOP) #10.1 Experiment Type Approvals (ETAs) for explosive material radiography, various dates NRT Console Log, various dates b. Observations and Findings The inspectors reviewed the process for the approval and conduct o f experiments at the facility; during this inspection there was a specific focus on experiments involving the radiography of explosive material in the south and north cells. The licensee recently implemented a work tracking spreadsheet with the ability to raise flags to notify of any restrictions and limitations thresholds that might be exceeded by the prepared work. The experiments and storage on site were being addressed and in adherence. The inspector determined that the experimental review process and approval for handling and storage of TNT-equivalent explosive material is in accordance with TS and approved procedures.


c. Conclusion Experiment review and approval was done in accordance with TS requirements, licensee procedures, and 10 CFR 50.59 regulations.
c.


3. Health Physics a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
Conclusion
The inspector reviewed the following to verify compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 and TS 4.2 and 6.3 requirements:
GE VNC dosimetry records for 2012 through the present Various forms documenting routine and special survey results for 2012 through the present Latest annual Radiation Program Review conducted by an auditor and dated March 2014 Meeting minutes of the GE Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) ALARA Committee for the past two years Calibration and periodic check records for radiation monitoring instruments GE VNC Vallecitos Safety Standards (VSS), Standard No. 1.4, "ALARA Committee Charter," issued February 2012 GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 5.2, "Radiation Exposure Limits," Rev. 10, issued September 2011 GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 8.1, "Radiological Training for VNC Employees," issued December 2008 GE VNC Nuclear Safety Procedures (NSP) No. 2100, "Dosimeter Accountability, Records, and Reports," Rev.


9, issued January 2008 GE VNC NSP No. 3355, "Radiological Surveys
Experiment review and approval was done in accordance with TS requirements, licensee procedures, and 10 CFR 50.59 regulations.
- Unrestricted Use," Rev. 10, issued October 2011 GE VNC NSP No. 3550, "Building 105/NTR Work Routines," Rev. 10, issued May 2008 GE VNC NSP No. 4310, "Air Sample Collection Responsibility," Rev.


9, issued November 2012 GE VNC NSP No. 5100, "Inventory, Inspection, and Calibration of Instruments Used for Radiation Protection of Personnel," Rev.
3.


9, issued December 2005 GE VNC Annual Report for the GE
Health Physics
-Hitachi NTR, No. 53, dated March 29, 2013 GE VNC Annual Report for the GE-Hitachi NTR, No. 54, dated March 31, 2014 The inspectors toured the licensee's facility and observed the use of dosimetry and radiation monitoring equipment. The inspectors also interviewed staff members as well.


b. Observations and Findings (1) Surveys The inspectors reviewed daily, weekly, monthly, semiannual and annual radiation and contamination surveys of licensee
a.
-controlled areas completed by GE VNC Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Department personnel.


The various periodic contamination and radiation surveys had been completed within the prescribed time frame required by procedure. Survey results were evaluated to ensure that established action levels had not been exceeded.
Inspection Scope (IP 69001)


In addition to reviewing the various surveys and evaluating the results, one of the inspectors also conducted a radiation survey of the Reactor Cell using an NRC
The inspector reviewed the following to verify compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 and TS 4.2 and 6.3 requirements:
-supplied instrument. The radiation levels noted by the inspector were comparable to those documented by the licensee on survey maps and no anomalies were noted.


(2) Postings and Notices During tours of the facility, the inspectors observed that the barrier rope, caution signs
GE VNC dosimetry records for 2012 through the present
, and postings in the lower roof area over the NTR had become weather
-worn and had fallen into disrepair.


Also, the entrance to one controlled area did not have a cautionary sign.
Various forms documenting routine and special survey results for 2012 through the present


When the licensee was notified of these problems, they were immediately corrected
Latest annual Radiation Program Review conducted by an auditor and dated March 2014
. It was noted that the restrictions established for other controlled areas were acceptable for hazards such as radiation, high radiation, and contamination and were posted as required by 10 CFR 20, Subpart J, "Precautionary Procedures." Copies of current notices to workers were posted in various areas in the facility. The copies of NRC Form 3, "Notice to Employees," noted at the facility were the latest issue and were posted as required by


10 CFR 19.11. (3) Dosimetry The inspector determined that the licensee used optically
Meeting minutes of the GE Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) ALARA Committee for the past two years
-stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLs) for whole body monitoring of beta and gamma radiation exposure with an additional component to measure neutron radiation. The licensee also used thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) finger rings for extremity monitoring. The dosimetry was supplied and processed by Landauer, a vendor that was accredited through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
 
Calibration and periodic check records for radiation monitoring instruments
 
GE VNC Vallecitos Safety Standards (VSS), Standard No. 1.4, ALARA Committee Charter, issued February 2012
 
GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 5.2, Radiation Exposure Limits, Rev. 10, issued September 2011
 
GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 8.1, Radiological Training for VNC Employees, issued December 2008
 
GE VNC Nuclear Safety Procedures (NSP) No. 2100, Dosimeter Accountability, Records, and Reports, Rev. 9, issued January 2008
 
GE VNC NSP No. 3355, Radiological Surveys - Unrestricted Use, Rev. 10, issued October 2011
 
- 3 -
 
GE VNC NSP No. 3550, Building 105/NTR Work Routines, Rev. 10, issued May 2008
 
GE VNC NSP No. 4310, Air Sample Collection Responsibility, Rev. 9, issued November 2012
 
GE VNC NSP No. 5100, Inventory, Inspection, and Calibration of Instruments Used for Radiation Protection of Personnel, Rev. 9, issued December 2005
 
GE VNC Annual Report for the GE-Hitachi NTR, No. 53, dated March 29, 2013
 
GE VNC Annual Report for the GE-Hitachi NTR, No. 54, dated March 31, 2014
 
The inspectors toured the licensees facility and observed the use of dosimetry and radiation monitoring equipment. The inspectors also interviewed staff members as well.
 
b.
 
Observations and Findings
 
(1)
Surveys
 
The inspectors reviewed daily, weekly, monthly, semiannual and annual radiation and contamination surveys of licensee-controlled areas completed by GE VNC Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S)
Department personnel. The various periodic contamination and radiation surveys had been completed within the prescribed time frame required by procedure. Survey results were evaluated to ensure that established action levels had not been exceeded.
 
In addition to reviewing the various surveys and evaluating the results, one of the inspectors also conducted a radiation survey of the Reactor Cell using an NRC-supplied instrument. The radiation levels noted by the inspector were comparable to those documented by the licensee on survey maps and no anomalies were noted.
 
(2)
Postings and Notices
 
During tours of the facility, the inspectors observed that the barrier rope, caution signs, and postings in the lower roof area over the NTR had become weather-worn and had fallen into disrepair. Also, the entrance to one controlled area did not have a cautionary sign. When the licensee was notified of these problems, they were immediately corrected.
 
It was noted that the restrictions established for other controlled areas were acceptable for hazards such as radiation, high radiation, and contamination and were posted as required by 10 CFR 20, Subpart J, Precautionary Procedures.
 
- 4 -
 
Copies of current notices to workers were posted in various areas in the facility. The copies of NRC Form 3, Notice to Employees, noted at the facility were the latest issue and were posted as required by 10 CFR 19.11.
 
(3)
Dosimetry  
 
The inspector determined that the licensee used optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLs) for whole body monitoring of beta and gamma radiation exposure with an additional component to measure neutron radiation. The licensee also used thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) finger rings for extremity monitoring. The dosimetry was supplied and processed by Landauer, a vendor that was accredited through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.


An examination of the OSL and TLD dosimeter results, indicating exposure to radiation at the facility for the past 2 years, showed that the occupational doses, as well as doses to the public, were within 10 CFR Part 20 limits.
An examination of the OSL and TLD dosimeter results, indicating exposure to radiation at the facility for the past 2 years, showed that the occupational doses, as well as doses to the public, were within 10 CFR Part 20 limits.


(4) Radiation Monitoring Equipment Calibration frequency met procedural and/or TS requirements and records were maintained as required. The inspectors verified that the instruments that were stationed for use in the Reactor Cell and in adjacent areas had been calibrated and were within the allowed calibration interval.
(4)
Radiation Monitoring Equipment  
 
Calibration frequency met procedural and/or TS requirements and records were maintained as required. The inspectors verified that the instruments that were stationed for use in the Reactor Cell and in adjacent areas had been calibrated and were within the allowed calibration interval.
 
(5)
Radiation Protection Program
 
The licensees Radiation Protection Program was established through various standards and procedures in use at the facility. The standards and procedures were maintained and available on-line. The program included requirements that all personnel who performed work in association with radioactive material receive training in radiation protection, policies, procedures, requirements, and facilities.
 
(6)
ALARA Program
 
The ALARA Program was also outlined and established through various guidance documents, standards, and procedures. The ALARA program provided guidance for keeping doses ALARA and was consistent with the guidance in 10 CFR Part 20.
 
(7)
Radiation Protection Training
 
As noted above, people who handled radioactive material, including licensee personnel, were required to receive training in radiation
 
- 5 -


(5) Radiation Protection Program The licensee's Radiation Protection Program was established through various standards and procedures in use at the facility. The standards and procedures were maintained and available on
protection. This was accomplished by staff members attending a class, reading material on-line, and successfully passing a written examination.
-line. The program included requirements that all personnel who performed work in association with radioactive material receive training in radiation protection, policies, procedures, requirements, and facilities.


(6) ALARA Program The ALARA Program was also outlined and established through various guidance documents, standards, and procedures. The ALARA program provided guidance for keeping doses ALARA and was consistent with the guidance in 10 CFR Part 20. (7) Radiation Protection Training As noted above, people who handled radioactive material, including licensee personnel, were required to receive training in radiation protection. This was accomplished by staff members attending a class, reading material on
Completion of this training by reactor staff personnel was verified by EH&S Department personnel as well as by the Reactor Manager and/or the Reactor Supervisor.
-line, and successfully passing a written examination. Completion of this training by reactor staff personnel was verified by EH&S Department personnel as well as by the Reactor Manager and/or the Reactor Supervisor.


(8) Radiation Work Permits (RWPs)
(8)
The inspector reviewed RWPs that had been written in 2013 and current RWPs that were in use during the inspection. There were two RWPs that remained in effect for the entire year due to the repetitive nature of the work they covered. One RWP covered normal operations and the other covered NTR outage work. Each had subsets of the RWP which were used to accomplish various tasks.
Radiation Work Permits (RWPs)  


It was noted that the controls specified in the RWPs were acceptable and applicable for the work being done. Also, the RWPs had been reviewed and approved as required.
The inspector reviewed RWPs that had been written in 2013 and current RWPs that were in use during the inspection. There were two RWPs that remained in effect for the entire year due to the repetitive nature of the work they covered. One RWP covered normal operations and the other covered NTR outage work. Each had subsets of the RWP which were used to accomplish various tasks. It was noted that the controls specified in the RWPs were acceptable and applicable for the work being done.


As noted in NRC Inspection Report 50
Also, the RWPs had been reviewed and approved as required.
-073/2012-201, the RWPs were semi-automated and used by the licensee to control and track individual dose and to make dose reduction enhancements at the NTR. The program appeared to be effective in helping to maintain doses ALARA.


a. Conclusion The inspectors determined that the Radiation Protection and ALARA Programs satisfied regulatory requirements because: 1) surveys were being completed and documented acceptably, 2) postings met regulatory requirements, 3) personnel dosimetry was being worn as required and doses were well within the NRC's regulatory limits, 4) radiation monitoring equipment was being maintained and calibrated as required, and 5) acceptable radiation protection training was being provided.
As noted in NRC Inspection Report 50-073/2012-201, the RWPs were semi-automated and used by the licensee to control and track individual dose and to make dose reduction enhancements at the NTR. The program appeared to be effective in helping to maintain doses ALARA.


4. Effluent and Environmental Monitoring a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
a.
The inspectors reviewed the following to verify compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and TS Sections 3.


2, 3.4, 4.2, and 4.4: Ambient Air and Gaseous Effluent monitoring records for the period from 2012 through the present Environmental surveillance program records for the period from 2012 to the present including analytical results of samples of industrial wastewater, groundwater, stream bottom sediments, and vegetation GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 7.0, "Environmental Protection
Conclusion
- Operation of VNC Facilities/Activities and Product/Environment Interactions,"
Rev. 7, issued March 2008 GE VNC NSP No. 9000, "Environmental Protection," Rev. 4, issued August 1999 Documentation of dose calculations using the EPA COMPLY program version 1.6 for 2012 and 2013 of gaseous effluents GE VNC Annual Report, 2012 Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Programs, dated February 28, 2013 GE VNC Annual Report, 2013 Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Programs, dated February 28, 2014 Annual Reports for License R
-33, Docket 50
-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013 b. Observation and Findings The inspectors reviewed the records documenting treated sanitary and industrial wastewater disposal for the past 2 years.


This water was either held in retention basins or disposed of by using an on
The inspectors determined that the Radiation Protection and ALARA Programs satisfied regulatory requirements because: 1) surveys were being completed and documented acceptably, 2) postings met regulatory requirements, 3) personnel dosimetry was being worn as required and doses were well within the NRCs regulatory limits, 4) radiation monitoring equipment was being maintained and calibrated as required, and 5) acceptable radiation protection training was being provided.
-site irrigation system. No liquid was released off
-site in accordance with policy and procedure
. The results of the water disposal were acceptably documented in Annual Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Program reports, as well as in the licensee's Annual Operating Reports submitted to the NRC.


On-site and off
4.
-site monitoring was accomplished using analyses of groundwater, vegetation, stream bottom sediments, and air. Environmental optically
-stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters were also used in accordance with the environmental surveillance program and applicable procedures.


Gaseous effluent monitoring was accomplished using exhaust stack monitoring.
Effluent and Environmental Monitoring


On-site and off-site laboratories were used to perform the analyses of the various samples. The results of these analyses indicated that there were no releases of radioactivity and no doses in excess of any regulatory limits. These results were also acceptably reported in the reports mentioned above
a.
. b. Conclusion Effluent monitoring satisfied license and regulatory requirements and releases were within the specified regulatory and TS limits.


5. Design Changes a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
Inspection Scope (IP 69001)  
The inspector reviewed the following to ensure that if design changes were made, they were reviewed and approved in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59, the TS, and the licensee's administrative procedures:
Annual Reports for License R
-33, Docket 50
-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013 Change Authorization 302, dated August 22, 2012 Change Authorization 303, dated August 23, 2012 SOP 9.4 "Change Authorization", reviewed December 21, 2012 b. Observations and Findings The licensee conducted maintenance activities at the reactor facility, which included the replacement of two Compensated Ion Chambers. All changes were reviewed and approved by the SRO/NTR Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Safety Committee, and the VNC Site Manager as require d. c. Conclusion Design changes were made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 requirements, TS, and licensee procedures.


6. Committees, Audits, and Reviews a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
The inspectors reviewed the following to verify compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and TS Sections 3.2, 3.4, 4.2, and 4.4:
The inspectors reviewed the following to ensure that the audits and reviews stipulated in TS Section 6.2 were being completed by the Safety Review Groups
: Annual Reports for License R
-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013 Vallecitos Technical Safety Committee (VTSC) Committee Meeting Minutes from 2012 to present Environmental Health and Safety's Regulatory Compliance Quarterly Audits from 2012 to present b. Observations and Findings The inspector s verified that the VTSC composition, meeting quorums, and meeting frequency were all in accordance with TS Section 6.2
. The inspector s also verified that Regulatory Compliance, the independent group auditing the facility operations, maintenance, and administration, was completing the periodic examination, as required by TS Section 6.2
, within a 2-year cycle.


c. Conclusion The VTSC provided the oversight required by the TS. 7. Transportation a. Inspection Scope (IP 86740)
Ambient Air and Gaseous Effluent monitoring records for the period from 2012 through the present
The inspectors reviewed the following to verify compliance with regulatory and procedural requirements for shipping or transferring licensed material: Selected records of radioactive material transfers for 2012 and to presen t GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 7.5, "On
-Site Transfers of Radioactive Material," Rev. 6, issued April 2010 GE - Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas, LLC, Radioactive Material License issued by the California Department of Public Health, License No. 0017-01, Amendment No. 74, expiration date December 6, 2009 (in timely renewal with the State of California)
a. Observations and Findings Records showed that radioactive material produced in the reactor and destined to be shipped off site was typically transferred to the facility
's State of California Broad Scope License
. This radioactive material was then shipped under that license; State of California Department of Public Health, Radioactive Material License No. 0017-01, Amendment No.


74, expiration date December 6, 2009. Radioactive material to be used on site was also transferred to the broad scope license and distributed by EH&S. A list of authorized personnel was maintained by the licensee
Environmental surveillance program records for the period from 2012 to the present including analytical results of samples of industrial wastewater, groundwater, stream bottom sediments, and vegetation
. The program for radioactive material transfer and transport was consistent with established procedural requirements. The transfer forms indicated the material had been surveyed and distributed to the appropriate authorized individuals as required. The material irradiated in the reactor was used/analyzed by contractor personnel or by licensee personnel in separate laboratories.
 
GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 7.0, Environmental Protection - Operation of VNC Facilities/Activities and Product/Environment Interactions, Rev. 7, issued March 2008
 
- 6 -
 
GE VNC NSP No. 9000, Environmental Protection, Rev. 4, issued August 1999
 
Documentation of dose calculations using the EPA COMPLY program version 1.6 for 2012 and 2013 of gaseous effluents
 
GE VNC Annual Report, 2012 Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Programs, dated February 28, 2013
 
GE VNC Annual Report, 2013 Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Programs, dated February 28, 2014
*
Annual Reports for License R-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013
 
b.
 
Observation and Findings
 
The inspectors reviewed the records documenting treated sanitary and industrial wastewater disposal for the past 2 years. This water was either held in retention basins or disposed of by using an on-site irrigation system. No liquid was released off-site in accordance with policy and procedure. The results of the water disposal were acceptably documented in Annual Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Program reports, as well as in the licensees Annual Operating Reports submitted to the NRC.
 
On-site and off-site monitoring was accomplished using analyses of groundwater, vegetation, stream bottom sediments, and air. Environmental optically-stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters were also used in accordance with the environmental surveillance program and applicable procedures. Gaseous effluent monitoring was accomplished using exhaust stack monitoring. On-site and off-site laboratories were used to perform the analyses of the various samples. The results of these analyses indicated that there were no releases of radioactivity and no doses in excess of any regulatory limits. These results were also acceptably reported in the reports mentioned above.
 
b.
 
Conclusion
 
Effluent monitoring satisfied license and regulatory requirements and releases were within the specified regulatory and TS limits.
 
5.
 
Design Changes
 
a.
 
Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
 
The inspector reviewed the following to ensure that if design changes were made, they were reviewed and approved in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59, the TS, and the licensees administrative procedures:
* Annual Reports for License R-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013
*
Change Authorization 302, dated August 22, 2012
 
- 7 -
* Change Authorization 303, dated August 23, 2012
*
SOP 9.4 Change Authorization, reviewed December 21, 2012
 
b.
 
Observations and Findings
 
The licensee conducted maintenance activities at the reactor facility, which included the replacement of two Compensated Ion Chambers. All changes were reviewed and approved by the SRO/NTR Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Safety Committee, and the VNC Site Manager as required.
 
c.
 
Conclusion
 
Design changes were made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 requirements, TS, and licensee procedures.
 
6.
 
Committees, Audits, and Reviews
 
a.
 
Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
 
The inspectors reviewed the following to ensure that the audits and reviews stipulated in TS Section 6.2 were being completed by the Safety Review Groups:
* Annual Reports for License R-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013
*
Vallecitos Technical Safety Committee (VTSC) Committee Meeting Minutes from 2012 to present
*
Environmental Health and Safetys Regulatory Compliance Quarterly Audits from 2012 to present
 
b.
 
Observations and Findings
 
The inspectors verified that the VTSC composition, meeting quorums, and meeting frequency were all in accordance with TS Section 6.2. The inspectors also verified that Regulatory Compliance, the independent group auditing the facility operations, maintenance, and administration, was completing the periodic examination, as required by TS Section 6.2, within a 2-year cycle.
 
c.
 
Conclusion
 
The VTSC provided the oversight required by the TS.
 
7.
 
Transportation
 
a.
 
Inspection Scope (IP 86740)
 
The inspectors reviewed the following to verify compliance with regulatory and procedural requirements for shipping or transferring licensed material:
 
- 8 -
 
Selected records of radioactive material transfers for 2012 and to present
 
GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 7.5, On-Site Transfers of Radioactive Material, Rev. 6, issued April 2010
 
GE - Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas, LLC, Radioactive Material License issued by the California Department of Public Health, License No. 0017-01, Amendment No. 74, expiration date December 6, 2009 (in timely renewal with the State of California)
 
a.
 
Observations and Findings
 
Records showed that radioactive material produced in the reactor and destined to be shipped off site was typically transferred to the facilitys State of California Broad Scope License. This radioactive material was then shipped under that license; State of California Department of Public Health, Radioactive Material License No. 0017-01, Amendment No. 74, expiration date December 6, 2009.
 
Radioactive material to be used on site was also transferred to the broad scope license and distributed by EH&S. A list of authorized personnel was maintained by the licensee. The program for radioactive material transfer and transport was consistent with established procedural requirements. The transfer forms indicated the material had been surveyed and distributed to the appropriate authorized individuals as required. The material irradiated in the reactor was used/analyzed by contractor personnel or by licensee personnel in separate laboratories.


Some material was radiographed at the reactor facility after which it was held for decay. When the radiation/radioactivity levels were appropriate, this material was shipped back to the entities requesting the radiography services.
Some material was radiographed at the reactor facility after which it was held for decay. When the radiation/radioactivity levels were appropriate, this material was shipped back to the entities requesting the radiography services.


b. Conclusion Radioactive material produced in the reactor was typically transferred to the licensee's state broad scope license and shipped under the auspices of that license or transferred to other authorized contractor or licensee users on site for use in laboratories in accordance with procedure.
b.
 
Conclusion  
 
Radioactive material produced in the reactor was typically transferred to the licensees state broad scope license and shipped under the auspices of that license or transferred to other authorized contractor or licensee users on site for use in laboratories in accordance with procedure.
 
8.
 
Exit Interview
 
The inspectors presented the inspection results to licensee management at the conclusion of the inspection on June 4, 2014, with a subsequent re-exit meeting on June 13, 2014. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection observations. No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee acknowledged the observations presented. It was discussed that any proprietary material provided to the inspector during the inspection that was removed from the facility would be disposed of appropriately.
 
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED
 
Licensee
 
J. Ayala
 
Radiation Protection Supervisor and Interim Radiation Safety Officer D. Boorn
 
Instrument Technician, Facilities and Maintenance Department GE VNC Site Manager E. Hagberg Radiation Monitoring Technician, Environmental Health and Safety Department T. McConnell Operations Specialist and Senior Reactor Operator D. Thomas
 
NTR Manager D. Lutz
 
VTSC, Chairman
 
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED
 
IP 69001 Class II Research and Test Reactors IP 86740 Transportation
 
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
 
OPENED None
 
CLOSED
 
None
 
DISCUSSED None
 
- 2 -
 
PARTIAL LIST OF ACRONYMS USED
 
10 CFR Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations ADAMS Agencywide Document Access and Management System ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable EH&S Environmental Health and Safety EPA
 
Environmental Protection Agency GE
 
General Electric Company IP
 
Inspection Procedure No.
 
Number NRC
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NSP
 
Nuclear Safety Procedure NTR
 
Nuclear Test Reactor OSL
 
Optically-Stimulated Luminescent Rev.
 
Revision RWP Radiation Work Permit SOP
 
Standard Operating Procedure TLD
 
Thermoluminescent Dosimeter TS
 
Technical Specifications VNC
 
Vallecitos Nuclear Center VSS


8. Exit Interview The inspector s presented the inspection results to licensee management at the conclusion of the inspection on June 4, 2014, with a subsequent re
Vallecitos Safety Standard VTSC Vallecitos Technological Safety Council
-exit meeting on [[Exit meeting date::June 13, 2014]]. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection observations. No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee acknowledged the observations presented
. It was discussed that any proprietary material provided to the inspector during the inspection that was removed from the facility would be disposed of appropriately
.
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSON S CONTACTED Licensee J. Ayala Radiation Protection Supervisor and Interim Radiation Safety Officer D. Boorn Instrument Technician, Facilities and Maintenance Department GE VNC Site Manager E. Hagberg Radiation Monitoring Technician, Environmental Health and Safety Department T. McConnell Operations Specialist and Senior Reactor Operator D. Thomas NTR Manager D. Lutz VTSC, Chairman INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 69001 Class II Research and Test Reactors IP 86740 Transportation ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED OPENED None CLOSED None DISCUSSED None PARTIAL LIST OF ACRONYMS USED 10 CFR Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations ADAMS Agencywide Document Access and Management System ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable EH&S Environmental Health and Safety EPA Environmental Protection Agency GE General Electric Company IP Inspection Procedure No. Number NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NSP Nuclear Safety Procedure NTR Nuclear Test Reactor OSL Optically
-Stimulated Luminescent Rev. Revision RWP Radiation Work Permit SOP Standard Operating Procedure TLD Thermoluminescent Dosimeter TS Technical Specifications VNC Vallecitos Nuclear Center VSS Vallecitos Safety Standard VTSC Vallecitos Technological Safety Council
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:14, 10 January 2025

IR 05000073-14-201 on June 2-4, 2014 at the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center - NRC Routine Announced Inspection Report No. 50-73/2014-201
ML14171A622
Person / Time
Site: Vallecitos Nuclear Center
Issue date: 07/07/2014
From: Isaac P
Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch
To: Caine T
General Electric Co
Font O, DPR/PROB, 415-2490
References
IR-14-201
Download: ML14171A622 (17)


Text

July 7, 2014

SUBJECT:

GENERAL ELECTRIC - NRC ROUTINE, ANNOUNCED INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-73/2014-201

Dear Mr. Caine:

On June 2-4, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission)

conducted a routine, announced inspection at the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) and held a subsequent phone call on June 12, 2014 and a re-exit meeting on June 13, 2014 (Inspection Report No. 50-73/2014-201). The inspection included a review of activities authorized for your facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection.

This inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations of activities in progress. Based on the results of this inspection, no safety concern or noncompliance with NRC requirements was identified. No response to this letter is required.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS)). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at (the Public Electronic Reading Room) http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact Ossy Font at 301-415-2490 or by electronic mail at Ossy.Font@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Patrick Isaac, Acting Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket No. 50-73 License No. R-33

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report No. 50-73/2014-201

cc: See next page

General Electric

Docket No. 50-73

cc:

Juan Ayala Radiation Safety Officer Vallecitos Nuclear Center General Electric Company 6705 Vallecitos Road Sunol, CA 94586

Mr. Dan Thomas Manager NTR Vallecitos Nuclear Center General Electric Company 6705 Vallecitos Road Sunol, CA 94586

Mr. Harold Neems General Electric Company Nuclear Energy Business Operations 175 Cutner Avenue Mail Code 123 San Jose, CA 95125

Commissioner California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-34 Sacramento, CA 95814

California Department of Health ATTN: Chief Radiologic Health Branch P.O. Box 997414, MS 7610 Sacramento, CA 95899-7414

Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter P.O. Box 118300 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-8300

ML14171A622

NRC-002 OFFICE NRR/DPR/PROB/RI NRR/DPR/PROB/BC NAME OFont PIsaac DATE 6/24/2014 7/7/2014

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

Docket No:

50-73

License No:

R-33

Report No:

50-73/2014-201

Licensee:

General Electric Company

Facility:

Nuclear Test Reactor (NTR)

Location:

Sunol, CA

Dates:

June 2-4, 2014

Inspectors:

Ossy Font

Craig Bassett

Approved by:

Patrick Isaac, Acting Chief

Research and Test Reactor Oversight Branch

Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center NRC Inspection Report No. 50-73/2014-201

The primary focus of this routine, announced inspection was the onsite review of selected aspects of the General Electric Company (GE, the licensee) Class II research reactor facility safety programs including: procedures; experiments; health physics; design changes; committees, audits and reviews; and transportation. The licensees programs were acceptably directed toward the protection of public health and safety, and were in compliance with the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements.

Procedures

  • Procedure administrative review, revision, adherence to, and implementation satisfied Technical Specification (TS) requirements.

Experiments

  • There were no new experiments since the last inspection. Previous experiment review and approval was done in accordance with TS requirements, licensee procedures, and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.59 regulations.

Health Physics

  • Periodic surveys were completed and documented as required by procedure.
  • Postings and signs met regulatory requirements.
  • Personnel dosimetry was being worn as required and recorded doses were within the NRCs regulatory limits.
  • Radiation survey and monitoring equipment was being maintained and calibrated as required.
  • The radiation protection training program was acceptable and training was being completed as required.
  • The radiation protection and the as low as reasonably achievable programs satisfied regulatory requirements.
  • Appropriate Radiation Work Permits were in place to provide guidance and precautionary requirements for on-going and emergent work at the facility.

- 2 -

Environmental Protection

  • Effluent monitoring satisfied license and regulatory requirements and releases were within the specified regulatory and TS limits.
  • The environmental protection program satisfied NRC requirements.

Design Changes

  • Design changes were made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 requirements, TS, and licensee procedures.

Committees, Audits, and Reviews

  • The Reactor Committee provided the oversight required by the TS.

Transportation

  • The licensee made no shipments of radioactive material under the auspices of the R-33 license.

REPORT DETAILS

Summary of Facility Status

The General Electric Companys (GE, the licensees) 100 kilowatt research reactor has been operated in support of neutron radiography, reactor operator training, and periodic equipment surveillances. During the inspection the reactor was operated to support radiography operations.

1.

Procedures

a.

Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspectors reviewed the following to ensure that the requirements of Technical Specifications (TS) Section 6.4, Procedures, were being met concerning written procedures:

  • Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (various), reviewed December 20-21, 2012

Engineering Releases, ER# 12-09 and ER# 12-10

b.

Observations and Findings

Records showed that procedures for TS required items were available. Since the last inspection it was determined that there were no substantive changes to the procedures. The licensee maintained approved procedures to satisfy the requirements of the TS.

A reactor startup was performed to support several radiography shoots. The startup was performed satisfactorily in accordance with reviewed and approved procedures.

c.

Conclusion

Procedure administrative review, revision, adherence to, and implementation satisfied TS requirements.

2.

Experiments

a.

Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

In order to verify that any modifications to the facility were consistent with TS requirements, procedures, and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.59 regulations, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:

  • Annual Reports for License R-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013

- 2 -

  • Nuclear Test Reactor (NTR) SOP (NTR SOP) #10.1 Experiment Type Approvals (ETAs) for explosive material radiography, various dates

NRT Console Log, various dates

b.

Observations and Findings

The inspectors reviewed the process for the approval and conduct of experiments at the facility; during this inspection there was a specific focus on experiments involving the radiography of explosive material in the south and north cells. The licensee recently implemented a work tracking spreadsheet with the ability to raise flags to notify of any restrictions and limitations thresholds that might be exceeded by the prepared work. The experiments and storage on site were being addressed and in adherence. The inspector determined that the experimental review process and approval for handling and storage of TNT-equivalent explosive material is in accordance with TS and approved procedures.

c.

Conclusion

Experiment review and approval was done in accordance with TS requirements, licensee procedures, and 10 CFR 50.59 regulations.

3.

Health Physics

a.

Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspector reviewed the following to verify compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 and TS 4.2 and 6.3 requirements:

GE VNC dosimetry records for 2012 through the present

Various forms documenting routine and special survey results for 2012 through the present

Latest annual Radiation Program Review conducted by an auditor and dated March 2014

Meeting minutes of the GE Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) ALARA Committee for the past two years

Calibration and periodic check records for radiation monitoring instruments

GE VNC Vallecitos Safety Standards (VSS), Standard No. 1.4, ALARA Committee Charter, issued February 2012

GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 5.2, Radiation Exposure Limits, Rev. 10, issued September 2011

GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 8.1, Radiological Training for VNC Employees, issued December 2008

GE VNC Nuclear Safety Procedures (NSP) No. 2100, Dosimeter Accountability, Records, and Reports, Rev. 9, issued January 2008

GE VNC NSP No. 3355, Radiological Surveys - Unrestricted Use, Rev. 10, issued October 2011

- 3 -

GE VNC NSP No. 3550, Building 105/NTR Work Routines, Rev. 10, issued May 2008

GE VNC NSP No. 4310, Air Sample Collection Responsibility, Rev. 9, issued November 2012

GE VNC NSP No. 5100, Inventory, Inspection, and Calibration of Instruments Used for Radiation Protection of Personnel, Rev. 9, issued December 2005

GE VNC Annual Report for the GE-Hitachi NTR, No. 53, dated March 29, 2013

GE VNC Annual Report for the GE-Hitachi NTR, No. 54, dated March 31, 2014

The inspectors toured the licensees facility and observed the use of dosimetry and radiation monitoring equipment. The inspectors also interviewed staff members as well.

b.

Observations and Findings

(1)

Surveys

The inspectors reviewed daily, weekly, monthly, semiannual and annual radiation and contamination surveys of licensee-controlled areas completed by GE VNC Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S)

Department personnel. The various periodic contamination and radiation surveys had been completed within the prescribed time frame required by procedure. Survey results were evaluated to ensure that established action levels had not been exceeded.

In addition to reviewing the various surveys and evaluating the results, one of the inspectors also conducted a radiation survey of the Reactor Cell using an NRC-supplied instrument. The radiation levels noted by the inspector were comparable to those documented by the licensee on survey maps and no anomalies were noted.

(2)

Postings and Notices

During tours of the facility, the inspectors observed that the barrier rope, caution signs, and postings in the lower roof area over the NTR had become weather-worn and had fallen into disrepair. Also, the entrance to one controlled area did not have a cautionary sign. When the licensee was notified of these problems, they were immediately corrected.

It was noted that the restrictions established for other controlled areas were acceptable for hazards such as radiation, high radiation, and contamination and were posted as required by 10 CFR 20, Subpart J, Precautionary Procedures.

- 4 -

Copies of current notices to workers were posted in various areas in the facility. The copies of NRC Form 3, Notice to Employees, noted at the facility were the latest issue and were posted as required by 10 CFR 19.11.

(3)

Dosimetry

The inspector determined that the licensee used optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLs) for whole body monitoring of beta and gamma radiation exposure with an additional component to measure neutron radiation. The licensee also used thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) finger rings for extremity monitoring. The dosimetry was supplied and processed by Landauer, a vendor that was accredited through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.

An examination of the OSL and TLD dosimeter results, indicating exposure to radiation at the facility for the past 2 years, showed that the occupational doses, as well as doses to the public, were within 10 CFR Part 20 limits.

(4)

Radiation Monitoring Equipment

Calibration frequency met procedural and/or TS requirements and records were maintained as required. The inspectors verified that the instruments that were stationed for use in the Reactor Cell and in adjacent areas had been calibrated and were within the allowed calibration interval.

(5)

Radiation Protection Program

The licensees Radiation Protection Program was established through various standards and procedures in use at the facility. The standards and procedures were maintained and available on-line. The program included requirements that all personnel who performed work in association with radioactive material receive training in radiation protection, policies, procedures, requirements, and facilities.

(6)

ALARA Program

The ALARA Program was also outlined and established through various guidance documents, standards, and procedures. The ALARA program provided guidance for keeping doses ALARA and was consistent with the guidance in 10 CFR Part 20.

(7)

Radiation Protection Training

As noted above, people who handled radioactive material, including licensee personnel, were required to receive training in radiation

- 5 -

protection. This was accomplished by staff members attending a class, reading material on-line, and successfully passing a written examination.

Completion of this training by reactor staff personnel was verified by EH&S Department personnel as well as by the Reactor Manager and/or the Reactor Supervisor.

(8)

Radiation Work Permits (RWPs)

The inspector reviewed RWPs that had been written in 2013 and current RWPs that were in use during the inspection. There were two RWPs that remained in effect for the entire year due to the repetitive nature of the work they covered. One RWP covered normal operations and the other covered NTR outage work. Each had subsets of the RWP which were used to accomplish various tasks. It was noted that the controls specified in the RWPs were acceptable and applicable for the work being done.

Also, the RWPs had been reviewed and approved as required.

As noted in NRC Inspection Report 50-073/2012-201, the RWPs were semi-automated and used by the licensee to control and track individual dose and to make dose reduction enhancements at the NTR. The program appeared to be effective in helping to maintain doses ALARA.

a.

Conclusion

The inspectors determined that the Radiation Protection and ALARA Programs satisfied regulatory requirements because: 1) surveys were being completed and documented acceptably, 2) postings met regulatory requirements, 3) personnel dosimetry was being worn as required and doses were well within the NRCs regulatory limits, 4) radiation monitoring equipment was being maintained and calibrated as required, and 5) acceptable radiation protection training was being provided.

4.

Effluent and Environmental Monitoring

a.

Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspectors reviewed the following to verify compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and TS Sections 3.2, 3.4, 4.2, and 4.4:

Ambient Air and Gaseous Effluent monitoring records for the period from 2012 through the present

Environmental surveillance program records for the period from 2012 to the present including analytical results of samples of industrial wastewater, groundwater, stream bottom sediments, and vegetation

GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 7.0, Environmental Protection - Operation of VNC Facilities/Activities and Product/Environment Interactions, Rev. 7, issued March 2008

- 6 -

GE VNC NSP No. 9000, Environmental Protection, Rev. 4, issued August 1999

Documentation of dose calculations using the EPA COMPLY program version 1.6 for 2012 and 2013 of gaseous effluents

GE VNC Annual Report, 2012 Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Programs, dated February 28, 2013

GE VNC Annual Report, 2013 Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Programs, dated February 28, 2014

Annual Reports for License R-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013

b.

Observation and Findings

The inspectors reviewed the records documenting treated sanitary and industrial wastewater disposal for the past 2 years. This water was either held in retention basins or disposed of by using an on-site irrigation system. No liquid was released off-site in accordance with policy and procedure. The results of the water disposal were acceptably documented in Annual Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance Program reports, as well as in the licensees Annual Operating Reports submitted to the NRC.

On-site and off-site monitoring was accomplished using analyses of groundwater, vegetation, stream bottom sediments, and air. Environmental optically-stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters were also used in accordance with the environmental surveillance program and applicable procedures. Gaseous effluent monitoring was accomplished using exhaust stack monitoring. On-site and off-site laboratories were used to perform the analyses of the various samples. The results of these analyses indicated that there were no releases of radioactivity and no doses in excess of any regulatory limits. These results were also acceptably reported in the reports mentioned above.

b.

Conclusion

Effluent monitoring satisfied license and regulatory requirements and releases were within the specified regulatory and TS limits.

5.

Design Changes

a.

Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspector reviewed the following to ensure that if design changes were made, they were reviewed and approved in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59, the TS, and the licensees administrative procedures:

  • Annual Reports for License R-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013

Change Authorization 302, dated August 22, 2012

- 7 -

  • Change Authorization 303, dated August 23, 2012

SOP 9.4 Change Authorization, reviewed December 21, 2012

b.

Observations and Findings

The licensee conducted maintenance activities at the reactor facility, which included the replacement of two Compensated Ion Chambers. All changes were reviewed and approved by the SRO/NTR Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Safety Committee, and the VNC Site Manager as required.

c.

Conclusion

Design changes were made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 requirements, TS, and licensee procedures.

6.

Committees, Audits, and Reviews

a.

Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspectors reviewed the following to ensure that the audits and reviews stipulated in TS Section 6.2 were being completed by the Safety Review Groups:

  • Annual Reports for License R-33, Docket 50-73, for the periods of January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013

Vallecitos Technical Safety Committee (VTSC) Committee Meeting Minutes from 2012 to present

Environmental Health and Safetys Regulatory Compliance Quarterly Audits from 2012 to present

b.

Observations and Findings

The inspectors verified that the VTSC composition, meeting quorums, and meeting frequency were all in accordance with TS Section 6.2. The inspectors also verified that Regulatory Compliance, the independent group auditing the facility operations, maintenance, and administration, was completing the periodic examination, as required by TS Section 6.2, within a 2-year cycle.

c.

Conclusion

The VTSC provided the oversight required by the TS.

7.

Transportation

a.

Inspection Scope (IP 86740)

The inspectors reviewed the following to verify compliance with regulatory and procedural requirements for shipping or transferring licensed material:

- 8 -

Selected records of radioactive material transfers for 2012 and to present

GE VNC VSS, Standard No. 7.5, On-Site Transfers of Radioactive Material, Rev. 6, issued April 2010

GE - Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas, LLC, Radioactive Material License issued by the California Department of Public Health, License No. 0017-01, Amendment No. 74, expiration date December 6, 2009 (in timely renewal with the State of California)

a.

Observations and Findings

Records showed that radioactive material produced in the reactor and destined to be shipped off site was typically transferred to the facilitys State of California Broad Scope License. This radioactive material was then shipped under that license; State of California Department of Public Health, Radioactive Material License No. 0017-01, Amendment No. 74, expiration date December 6, 2009.

Radioactive material to be used on site was also transferred to the broad scope license and distributed by EH&S. A list of authorized personnel was maintained by the licensee. The program for radioactive material transfer and transport was consistent with established procedural requirements. The transfer forms indicated the material had been surveyed and distributed to the appropriate authorized individuals as required. The material irradiated in the reactor was used/analyzed by contractor personnel or by licensee personnel in separate laboratories.

Some material was radiographed at the reactor facility after which it was held for decay. When the radiation/radioactivity levels were appropriate, this material was shipped back to the entities requesting the radiography services.

b.

Conclusion

Radioactive material produced in the reactor was typically transferred to the licensees state broad scope license and shipped under the auspices of that license or transferred to other authorized contractor or licensee users on site for use in laboratories in accordance with procedure.

8.

Exit Interview

The inspectors presented the inspection results to licensee management at the conclusion of the inspection on June 4, 2014, with a subsequent re-exit meeting on June 13, 2014. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection observations. No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee acknowledged the observations presented. It was discussed that any proprietary material provided to the inspector during the inspection that was removed from the facility would be disposed of appropriately.

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED

Licensee

J. Ayala

Radiation Protection Supervisor and Interim Radiation Safety Officer D. Boorn

Instrument Technician, Facilities and Maintenance Department GE VNC Site Manager E. Hagberg Radiation Monitoring Technician, Environmental Health and Safety Department T. McConnell Operations Specialist and Senior Reactor Operator D. Thomas

NTR Manager D. Lutz

VTSC, Chairman

INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED

IP 69001 Class II Research and Test Reactors IP 86740 Transportation

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

OPENED None

CLOSED

None

DISCUSSED None

- 2 -

PARTIAL LIST OF ACRONYMS USED

10 CFR Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations ADAMS Agencywide Document Access and Management System ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable EH&S Environmental Health and Safety EPA

Environmental Protection Agency GE

General Electric Company IP

Inspection Procedure No.

Number NRC

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NSP

Nuclear Safety Procedure NTR

Nuclear Test Reactor OSL

Optically-Stimulated Luminescent Rev.

Revision RWP Radiation Work Permit SOP

Standard Operating Procedure TLD

Thermoluminescent Dosimeter TS

Technical Specifications VNC

Vallecitos Nuclear Center VSS

Vallecitos Safety Standard VTSC Vallecitos Technological Safety Council