ML15313A064

2015 Clinton Power Station Initial License Examination Forms ES-403-1

ML15313A064
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	11/06/2015
From:	Division of Reactor Safety III
To:
Shared Package
ML15124A054	List: ML15313A055 ML15313A061 ML15313A062 ML15313A063 ML15313A064 ML15313A066 ML15313A201 ML15314A105
References
Download: ML15313A064 (2)

Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 3/26/15 Exam Level: RO~ SRO Item Description

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature

a. Author Ton D. Jennin s I

b. Facility Reviewer(')

Jim Lucas I

c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)

d. NRG Supervisor(*)

Initials a

b Date 3130/15 3130/15

(')

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5 c

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facilit : CLINTON Date of Exam: 3/26/2015 Exam Level: RO 5{)

SRO C8J Initials Item Descri tion a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets co ied before

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified rJ /J.

and documented

?:

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors

~f ~ Jt-(reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, (3f ~

licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail as a

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 8f JZ-If are *ustified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training Bf oz-ff deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a Ii cants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader J)RC

b.,J:.aemty Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor(*)

~ ~-

4m,/t5

~~~~

~ I 4'

Lffaz/;s

¢~-!

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not app icable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

~'5 4/'lJI 15

'f~v~

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 3/26/15 Exam Level: RO~ SRO Item Description

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature

a. Author Ton D. Jennin s I

b. Facility Reviewer(')

Jim Lucas I

c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)

d. NRG Supervisor(*)

Initials a

b Date 3130/15 3130/15

(')

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5 c

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facilit : CLINTON Date of Exam: 3/26/2015 Exam Level: RO 5{)

SRO C8J Initials Item Descri tion a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets co ied before

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified rJ /J.

and documented

?:

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors

~f ~ Jt-(reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, (3f ~

licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail as a

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 8f JZ-If are *ustified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training Bf oz-ff deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a Ii cants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader J)RC

b.,J:.aemty Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor(*)

~ ~-

4m,/t5

~~~~

~ I 4'

Lffaz/;s

¢~-!

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not app icable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

~'5 4/'lJI 15

'f~v~