|
|
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:x . ;a Braidwood ER-OLS AMEN 0er."'T 'l vIl FEBRUAR) '983, | | {{#Wiki_filter:}} |
| ! INSTRUCTIONS FOR UPDATING YOUR ER-To update your copy of the Braidwood Station Environmental Report -
| |
| Operating License Stage, please remove and oestroy the following pages and figures and insert the Amendment'l pages and figures as indicated.
| |
| REMOVE INSERT VOLUME 1 Pages i and 11 Pages i and 11 Pages 1.0-i/1.0-11 and 1.0-111/
| |
| ! 1.0-iv Page 1.0-1 Pages 1.0-1/1.0-2 through 1.1-53 Page 1.0-1
| |
| ! Figures 1.1-1 through 1.1-11 i Page 1.2-1 Page 1.3-1 Pages 2.1-3 /2.1-2 through 2.1-7/ Pages 2.1-1/ 2.1-2 through
| |
| . 2.1-8 2.1-8a Page 2.1-17/2.1-18 Page 2.1-17/2.1-18 Page 2.1-23/2.1-24 Page 2.1-23/ 2.1-24 O eeoes 2 1-27'2 1-28 thro"a" 2.1-31/2.1-32 eeoes 1-27,2.1 2e threug 2.1-31/2.1-32 Page 2.1-57/2.1-58 Page 2.1-57/2.1-58 Figures 2.1-2 and 2.1-3 Figures 2.1-2 and 2.1-3 Figure 2.1-6 Figure 2.1-6 Figure 2.1-8 Figure 2.1-8 Figure 2.1-10 Figure 2.1-10 Pages 2.2-19/2.2-20 and Pages 2. 2-19/ 2. 2-20 and
| |
| : 2. 2-21/ 2. 2-22 2. 2-21/ 2.2-22 l Page 2. 3-21/ 2. 3-22 Page 2. 3-21/ 2. 3-22 Page 2.4-1/2.4-2 Page 2.4-1/2.4-2 Pages 2.4-31/2.4-32 and Pages 2.4-31/2.4-32 and 2.4-33/2.4-34 2.4-33/2.4-34 Page 2. 7-1/ 2. 7-2 Page 2. 7-1/ 2. 7-2 -
| |
| Page 2. 7-7 / 2. 7-8 Page 2.7-7/2.7-8 VOLUME 2 REMOVE INSERT Pages i and 11 Pages i and 11 Page 3.0-lii/3.0-iv Page 3.0-lil/3.0-iv j Page 3.1-1/3.1-2 Page 3.1-1/3.1-2
| |
| ; Figure 3.3-1 Figure 3. 3-1 Page 3.4-1/3.4-2 Page 3.4-1/3.4-2 O
| |
| l 8303100328 830303 PDR ADOCK 05000456 C PDR .
| |
| t
| |
| | |
| h '.. 3 '
| |
| 1 l
| |
| 1
| |
| (')-
| |
| U VOLUME 2 (continued)
| |
| REMOVE INSERT Page 3.5-9/3.5-10 .
| |
| Pages 3.5 -9 and 3.5-9a/3.5-10 Pages 3.5-15/3.5-16 through- Pages 3.5-15/3.5-16 through 3.5-25/3.5-26 3.5-25/3.5-26 Pages 3.5-29/3.5-30 and 3.5-31 Pages 3.5-29/3.5-30 and 3.5-31 Figure 3.5-1 Figure 3.5-1 Pages 3.5A-3/3.5A-4 and Pages 3.5A-3/3.5A-4 and 3.5A-5/3.5A-6 3.5A-5/3.5A-6 Pages 3.5A-9/3.5A-10 through Pages 3.5A-9/3.5A-10 through 3.5A-13/3.5A-14 3.5A-13/3.5A-14 Page 3.5A-19/3.5A-20 Page 3.5A-19/3.5A-20 Pages 3.6-3/3.6-4 and Pages 3.6-3/3.6-4 and 3.6-5/3.6-6 3.6-5/3.6-6 Pages 3.9-1/3.9-2 through Pages 3.9-1/3.9-2 through 3.9-5/3.9-6 3.9-7 Figures 3.9-1 knd 3.9-2 Figures 3.9-1 and 3.9-2 Pages 4.0-1/4.0-11 and Pages 4.0-1/4.0-11 an t 4.0-lii/4.0-iv 4.0-ill/4.0-iv Page 4.1-1/4.1-2 Pages 4.1-1 and 4.1-la/4.1-2 Pages 4.1-5/4.1-6 through Pages 4.1-5/4.1-6 through 4.1-9/4.1-10 4.1-9/4.1-10
| |
| {VT Pages 4.1-15/4.1-16 and 4.1-17 Figures 4.1-1 through 4.1-3 Figures 4.1-1 through 4.1-3 Page 4.lA-i Page 4.lA-1 Pages 4.lA-9/4.lA-10 and 4.1A-ll '
| |
| Page 4.lC-1 Pages 4.lC-1/4.lC-2 through 4.1C-13/4.lC-14 Page 4.?-1/4.3-2 Page 4.3-1/4.3-2 Page 5.2-7/5.2-8 Pages 5.2-7 and 5.2-7a/5.2-8 Page 5.2-9/5.2-10 Page 5.2-9/5.2-10 Pages 5.6-1/5.6-? through 5.6-7 Pages 5.6-1/5.6-2 through 5.6-7 Figure 5.6-5 Figure 5.6-5 Pages 5.8-1/5.8-2 and Pages 5.8-1/5.8-2 and 5.8-3/5.8-4 5.8-3/5.8-4 Page 6.0-1/6.0-11 Page 6.0-1/6.0-11 Pages 6.1-43/6.1-44 and Pages 6.1-43/6.1-44 and 6.1-45/6.1-46 6.1-45/6.1-46 Pages 6.1-59/6.1-60 and Pages 6.1-59/6.1-60 6.1-61/6.1-62 6.1-61/6.1/62 Page 6.4-1 Page 6.4-1 Page 8.0-1/8.0-11 Page 8.0-1/8.0-11 Page 8.0-1 Page 8.0-1 Pages 8.1-1/8,1-2 and Pages 8.1-1/8.1-2 through 8.1-3/6.1-4 8.1-5/8.1-6 Page 8.2-1/8.2-2 Page 8.2-1/8.2-2 e
| |
| | |
| . . -~
| |
| X)
| |
| (_
| |
| VOLUME 2 (continued)
| |
| REMOVE INSERT -
| |
| Pages 8.3-1/8.3-2 and 8.3-3 Pages 8.3-1/8.3-2 and 8.3-3 Page 11.0-1/11.0-2 Pages 11.0-1/11.0-2 and 11.0-2a Pages 12.0-1/12.0-2 through Pages 12.0-1/12.0-2 through 12.0-7/12.0-8 12.0-7/12.0-8 Page 13.0-1 Page 13.0-1 Pages 13.0-1/13.0-2 through Pages 13.0-1/13.0-2 through 13.0-5/13.0-6 13.0-6a Page 13.0-31/13.0-32 Pages 13.0-31/13.0-32 and 13.0-32a Page 13.0-43/13.0-44 Page 13.0-43/13.0-44 Following page 13.0-49/13.0-50 Amendment 1 tab and (do not remove) Page Al-1/Al-2 O
| |
| i O
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENOMENT 1 f~N FEBRUARY 1983 m)
| |
| BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - UNITS 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE CONTENTS CHAPTER VOLUME Introduction 1 Chapter 1.0. .- Purpcoe of the Proposed Facility and Associated Transmission 1 Chapter 2.0 - The Site and Environmental Interfaces 1 Appendix 2.6A - Cultural, Historical, Archaeological Letters 1 Chapter 3.0 - The Station 2 Appendix 3.5A - Data Needed for Radioactive Source Term Calculations for Pressurized Water Reactors 2
| |
| (* Chapter 4.0 - Environmental Effects of Site Preparation, Station Construction, and Transmission Facilities Construction 2 Appendix 4.lA - Terrestrial Monitoring' Program Letters 2 Appendix 4.1B - Aquatic Monitoring Program Letters 2 Appendix 4.lC - Aquatic Monitoring Program, Construc-tion Phase, Executive Summaries 2 1 Appendix 4.5A - Conetruction Impact Control Letters 2 Chapter 5.0 - Environmental Effects of Station Operation 2 Appendix 5.2A - Examples of Dose Calculational Methods 2 Chapter 6.0 - Effluent and Environmental Measurements and Monitoring Programs 2 Cnapter 7.0 - Environmental Effects of Accidents 2
| |
| () #
| |
| .-_..___m,_ .__ . _ _ ~ - _ , _ - , _ , . . _ - - _ _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ . . . _ , , - _ _ , . . . . _ ,
| |
| . _ _ _ _ _ . ~. _ . . - - _
| |
| | |
| i Braidwood ER-OLS AMENOMENT 1
| |
| (~'s FEBRUARY 1983 w'
| |
| BRAIOWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - UNITS 1 & 2 l '%
| |
| ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE CONTENTS CHAPTER- VOLUME Chapter 8.0 - Economic and Social Effects of Station Construction and Operation 2 Chapter.9.0 - Alternative Energy Sources and Sites 2 Chapter 10.0 - Station Design Alternatives 2 l
| |
| Chapter 11.0 - Summary Cost-Benefit Analysis 2 Chapter-12.0 - Environmental Approvals and Consul-tation 2 Chapter 13.0 - References 2 Amendment 1 - Voluntary Revisions 2 1
| |
| ! 11 1O l
| |
| l l
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS. AMENDMENT 1
| |
| '( FEBRUARY 1983 1
| |
| CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED
| |
| -FACILITY AND ASSOCIATED TRANSMISSION i
| |
| -The electrical output of the Braidwood Nuclear Genersting Station - "
| |
| Units 1 and 2 (Braidwood Station) will be used to satisfy the power r
| |
| :' requirements of the Commonwealth Edison Coinpany (CECO)' system. {
| |
| Initially _this electrical' power may supplant power generated _by '
| |
| other nieans such as coal or oil fired units -with higher incremental $
| |
| -production costs.- +
| |
| i Chapter 8 of this Environmental Report contains a discussion of socioeconomic benefits from operation of this facility. '
| |
| j 4
| |
| l i
| |
| , C:) ;
| |
| t f
| |
| [
| |
| t
| |
| * i
| |
| +
| |
| r i l
| |
| () 1.0-1 f
| |
| [
| |
| | |
| r-(, Braidwood ER-OLS AMENOMENT 1 4.s ,) FEBRUARY-1983 CHAPTER 2.0 - THE SITE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACES
| |
| ?
| |
| : 2. l' GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY-2.1.1 . Site Location and Description 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location The Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 and 2 (Braidwood Station) is located in Reed Township of Will County northeastern Illinois approximately 50 miles southwest of Chicago and 20 miles south-southwest of Joliet. It is adjacent at its northwest corner to the village of Godley and its western and southern borders lie adjacent to the Grundy and Kankakee County boundary-lines, respec-tively. Tha site is in an area of flat agricultural farmland that has-been scarred from coal strip mining, and the site itself .is located principally on terrain that has been strip mined.
| |
| At its closest approach, the Kankakee River is approximately 3 miles east of the northeastern site boundary; this point is approx-imately 12 miles upstream of the headwaters of the Illinois River at the confluence of the Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers. The Braidwood Station is located approximately 8 miles southwest of the 7s)
| |
| (_ Joliet Arsenal.
| |
| Figure 2.1-1 shows the location of the site within the State of Illinois, and Figure 2.1-2 outlines the site with respect to the Kankakee River and the county boundaries. The following coordi-nates of the center of containments are given in both latitude and longitude and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Coordinates.
| |
| Latitude and longitude are given to the nearest second and UTM Coordinates are given to the nearest 100 meters.
| |
| Nuclear Unit Latitude and Longitude UTM Coordinates 1 880 13' 42" W x 410 14' 38" N 4,565,3'00 N 397,000 E 2 880 13' 42" W x 410 14' 36" N 4,565,200 N 397,000 E 2.1.1.2 Site Area The roughly rectangular site occupies approximately 4454 acres of $
| |
| which 2537 acres comprise the cooling pond. The pond has an eleva-tion of 595 feet above mean sea level (MSL) when filled to capac-ity. The plant property lines and the site boundary lines are the same. 1 The site boundary and the general outline of the pond are sho.n in Figure 2.1-3. As noted in this figure, the nuclear generating Os.
| |
| 2.1-1
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 fccilities are located at the northwest corner of the site. Figure 2.1-4 shows the location and orientation of the principal plant structures. The makeup and blowdown lines are buried in the ground within a transmission line corridor and have their respective 1
| |
| source and terminus at the Kankakee River as shown in Figure 2.1-2.
| |
| The plant exclusion area, located within the site boundary, is illustrated in Figure 2.1-5. The minimum exclusion boundary dis-tance from the gaseous release point is 1625 feet.
| |
| There are no industrial, commercial, institutional, recreational, or residential structures on the site. Illinois State Routes 53 and 129 are adjacent to the northwest boundary of the site. The Illinois Central Gulf Railroad (previously the Gulf Mobile & Ohio Railroad) runs parallel between State Routes 53 and 129 and pro-vides spur track access from the site area to the main line. In-terstate 55 is less than 2 miles west-northwest of the site and State Route 113 is approximately 2 miles north of the site. Figure 2.1-6 illustrates these transportation routes. The Kankakee River is approximately 3 miles east of the northeastern site boundary.
| |
| 2.1.1.3 Boundaries for Establishing Effluent Release Limits It is required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Sec-tion 20.106 (10 CFR 20.106) that "a licensee shall not possess, lll use, or transfer licensed material so as to release to an unrc-stricted area radioactive material in concentrations which exceed the limits specified in Appendix 'B', Table II of this part . . .
| |
| "; it is further required by 10 CFR 50.34a that "in the case of an application filed on or after January 2, 1971, the application shall also identify the design objectives, and the means to be employed, for keeping levels of radioactive material in ef fluents to unrestricted areas as low as practicable."
| |
| The restricted area boundary, the boundary that separates the re-stricted area from the unrestricted by 10 CFR 20.106, is specified to be the plant property line for the Braidwood Station. Expected concentrations of radionuclides in effluents are shown in Sections 3.5 and 5.2 to be in compliance with 10 CFR 20.106 criteria.
| |
| Figure 2.1-3 illustrates the restricteo area boundary and Figure 2.1-2 shows the boundary with respect to the Kankakee River.
| |
| The distances from the release point of gaseous effluents (tne vent stack) to the restricted area boundary for each of the 16 direc-tional segments are given in Table 2.1-1. The site boundary clos-est to the release point of gaseous effluents is in the northwest-crn direction at a distance of 1625 feet.
| |
| 2.1- 2 O
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| 1 Braidwood 2R-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| ()
| |
| A_j -
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 Liquid-effluents are discharged into the cooling pond blowdown line, which. subsequently discharges into the Kankakee River. Radi-onuclides in liquid effluents, therefore, enter the unrestricted area at that point.
| |
| The restricted area boundary is posted conspicuously with " Private Property No Trespassing" signs. 'In addition, administrative procedures include periodic patrolling.to control access to the area.
| |
| 2.1.2 Population Distribution 2.1.2.1 Population within 10 Miles In order to assess the population distribution within a 10-mile radius of the Braidwood Station, a detailed analysis was per-formed. For this purpose, the region surrounding the station was divided into sixteen 22.50 azimuthal sectors centered on the centerline of the reactors with outer radial increments of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 miles. The geographical locations of these sectors are identified in Figure 2.1-7. The 1970 and 1980 population den- 1 sities within these radial-azimuthal sectors were obtained by per-forming a house count from general highway maps for Will, Grundy, and Kankakee Counties based on 1968, 1969 and 1980 local census
| |
| () data. The population-center data were updated to the reported 1980 1 U.S. Bu; eau of Census values. All permanent residences were House counts were converted to population by assuming 3.4 counted.
| |
| persons per household based on 1970 U.S. Bureau of-Census data for Will County. Comparable values for Grundy and Kankakee Counties were 3.17 and 3.15, respectively.
| |
| The results of this analysis, as presented in Table 2.1-2, show that the 1980 population out to 10 miles was 28,548 corresponding i to an average population density in this area of 91 persons per square mile. The maximum population densities in the near vicinity of the plant occur in the northern sectors, which encompass the cities of Braidwood and Wilmington and the village of Coal City.
| |
| I The population data were projected over the expected 40-year oper-ating life of the plant by census decade using the modified ratio method. The basic formula used for the population projection by county was:
| |
| Pt = Po (1 + r)T Where: Pt = population in year t; Po = population in base year; r = average annual rate of population change; and T = number of years between the base year and the year
| |
| () of the projection (year t).
| |
| 2.1-3
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 Based on previous census history (1940-1970), the rural population within 10 miles of the Braidwood Station has tended to remain con-stant in all the allinois counties of interest except Will and Grundy. Thus, except for these two counties, population growth was assumed to take place only near present urban centers (those loca-tions with a population greater than 2500).
| |
| The county population for the 1970 base year was subdivided into rural and urban components by township. The projected population increase in a county was distributed among townships at a level proportional to the magnitude of urban population in each township for the base year 1970. Rural townships were held constant at the 1970 census level.
| |
| Census data of Will and Grundy counties for the previous decade -
| |
| indicate that the population growth rate in rural areas is very similar to the rate characterizing urban areas. Thus, township populations in these two counties were assumed to increase at the same rate as the county population.
| |
| The rate of population growth in a particular county during the last decade (1960-1970) was used to obtain the county's annual rate of change, which is utilizec for the period up to and including 1990. On the assumption that the increase in population within this region over the period from 1970 to 1990 will be sufficiently large to divert migration from the greater Chicago area to other regions of northern Illinois, the annual population rate of change for all counties within the 10-mile radius after 1990 was tken to be the projected rate for the State of Illinois (about 1% per yeer) for that perod based on U.S. Census projection data. Onsite resi-dences were not included in the projected data. The projected population for the proposed Finger Lakes Estates mobile home park is included in the north-northeast sector in the 3-to 4-mile seg-ment. This projection was obtained by multiplying the proposed 800 units (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 1977) by 2.3, the average number of persons living in owner-occupied mobile homes in Illinois according to the 1970 Census of Housing (Bureau of the Census 1972).
| |
| The results of this analysis of projected population distribut?qn are shown in Table 2.1-2 for the expected 40-year operating 11,; of the plant by census decade. From these projections, it is seen that the population within 10 miles of the site is expected to grow from 22,116 in 1970 to 47,577 in 2020, corresponding to an average population density of 151 persons per squate mile.
| |
| The projected national age distribution for the year 2000 (midpoint of station operating life) is 17.5% in the O to 11 age group, 11.1%
| |
| in the 12 to 18 age group, and 71.4% in the 19 and over age group 2.1-4
| |
| | |
| a
| |
| ,_ Braidwood-ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| ()' '
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 (Bureau of the Census 1975). These percentages cor:espong to a projected 2000 population of 6,937 persons in the U to 11 age group, 4,400 persons in the 12 to 18 age group, and 28,303 persons in the 19.and over age group within 10 miles of the site. _The U.S.
| |
| projected age distribution was used because the area within a 10-mile radius of the site (Will, Kankakee, and Grundy Counties) did not show a significant difference from the 1970 U.S. Census age distribution (Bureau of the Census 1971).
| |
| When applying the significance test described in Appendix 0 of Regulatory Guide 4.2, Will County did vary more than 10% from the 1970 U.S. Census age distribution in one of the three age groups (14.7% in the 0-11 age group). However, Grundy and Kankakee Coun-ties did not significantly differ from the U.S. distribution. The average age distribution for the three counties did not vary more than 10% from the 1970 U.S. Census age distributio.n. Thus, it is assumtd that the area within a 10-mile radius of the site will have a projected age distribution similar to the U.S. projected age distribution.
| |
| Figure 2.1-8 locates cities and villages within 10 miles of the site and provides their 1980 populations. Only Braidwood, Coal City and Wilmington can be classified as urban centers (population
| |
| \;^
| |
| , greater than 2500) within 10 miles of the site. The village of Godley with a 1980 population of 373 is located approximately 0.5 1 mile southwest and west-southwest of the reactor. The city of Braidwood with a 1980 populaton of 3429 is located approximately 1.5 miles north and north-northeast of the station.
| |
| 2.1.2.2 Population between 10 and 50 Miles The 1970 and 1980 population distribution and the estimated pro- 3 jected population distributions through 2020 at 10-year intervals for the area between 10 and 50 miles are summarized in Table 2.1-3. The geographical locations of the population sectors are found in Figure 2.1-9. The total population within 50 miles was 4,472,612 in 1980 with an average population density of 570 persons 1 per square mile. By 2020, the population is projected to grow to 7,559,624, which yialds a population density of 963 persons per -
| |
| square mile.
| |
| The most heavily populated sectors within 50 miles of the station lie in the north-northeast and northeast directions. The 1980 populations in those directions are 1,14 2,815 and 2,145,518, res-pectively. the high populations in these sectors is primarily due i to the inclusion of the City of Joliet (1980 population 77,956) and a portion of Chicago (1980 population 3,005,072). Also included in this area are some suburbs of Chicago.
| |
| O 2.1-5 1
| |
| . - . . _ . ~ - - - - - -- __ - ..- - -
| |
| | |
| y 1
| |
| I l
| |
| l Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 To obtain the population figuies by sector, the U.S. Bureau of Census data for 1980 were used according to township, and the pop- i ulatin density within a township was assumed constant. Thus, the estimated fractional area of a township within a sector was useo to estimate the fraction of the township's population in that sector.;
| |
| all fractional townships within a sector were summed to give the population within that sector.
| |
| Population projections were ,jenerally made according to the same techniques used for the O- to 10-mile region, including the sectors within Indiana which have exhibited the same growth patterns as Illinois. The exceptions to this basic population projection model as used for the 10- to 50-mile region are:
| |
| : a. Newton County, Indiana, whose entirely rural population was assumed to remain constant with time, in accord with census patterns that reveal that no significant increase in rural populations can be anticipated;
| |
| : b. Chicago, in Cook County, Illinois, whose population has actu-ally experienced a decrease in the last decade and was assumed to remain constant at the 1970 census level; and
| |
| : c. DuPage County, Illinois, whose townships containing small and Ih
| |
| ~
| |
| continually declining rural populations were assumed to ex-hibit population growth at the same rate as the county.
| |
| The projected national age distribution for the year 2000 (midpoint of station operating life) is 17.5% in the O to 11 age group, 11.1%
| |
| in the 12 to 18 age group, and 71.4% in the 19 and over age group (Bureau of the Census 1975). These percentages correspond to a projected 2000 population of 1,093,384 perions in the O to 11 age group, 693,518 persons in the 12 to 18 age group, and 4,461,008 persons in the 19 and over age group within 50 miles of the site.
| |
| The U.S. projected age distribution was used because the area within a 50-mile radius of the station did not vary significantly from the 1970 U.S. Census age distribution described in Appendix 0 of Regulatory Guide 4.2 to the 50-mile area, six of the 18 counties within 50 miles dif fered more than 10% from the 1970 U.S. Census age distribution. However, the other 12 counties did not signifi-cantly differ from the U.S. distribution. Since the average age distributions for the 18 counties did not vary more than 10% from the 1970 census age distribution, it can be assumed that the area within a 50-mile radius of the site will have a projected age dis-tribution similar to the U.S. projected age distribution.
| |
| The nearest population center is Joliet, located approximately 20 miles north-northeast of the site. According to the 1970 popula-tion census, Joliet had a population of 80,378, and in 1980, $ q 2.1-6 L-
| |
| | |
| _ ,_ Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| ~( ) FEBRUARY 1983 77,956, a dectuase of 3.1% during the last decade. Its expected 1 population is 150,389 by 2000, and 181,970 by 2020. The city o f Kankakee, located approximately 20 miles eastsoutheast of the site, had a 1970 population of 30,944, and in 1980, 30,141, and has an expected population of 44,800 oy 2000, and 55,000 by 2020. Table .1 2.1-4 lists the - 25 population ~ centers within 50 miles of the site and Figure 2.1-10 locates them. Most of these centers are located near the greater Chicago metropolitan area, 40 to 50 miles north-east of the site.
| |
| Table 2.1-5 lists the distance and approximate direction from the site of all urban centers (those locations with a- population greater than 2500) within a 30-mile radius of the site and gives their 1980 populations. It should be noted that there are only 22 such urban centers and that only two of these, Joliet and Kankakee, $
| |
| are population centers.
| |
| 2.1.2.3. Transient Population The transient population within 10 miles of the site is composed of visitors to recreational facilities, students enrolled at and teaching staff employed by schools, and employees at industrial establishments.
| |
| As shown in Table 2.1-6, the state parks and conservation areas within a 10-mile radius of the site include the Des Plaines Conser-vation Area approximately 8 miles north of the site, the Goose Lake Prairie State Park approximately 9 miles north-northwest of the site, the Kankakee River State Park approximately 9 miles east of the site, and the Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail (Channahon Park Access) approximately 10 miles north of the site.
| |
| In 1976, these four parks had a combined annual attendence of 1,699,722 persons (Illinois Department of Conservation 1976). The estimated peak daily attendances for these areas are respectively 1000, 462, 33,000, and 1000 visitors.
| |
| The Des Plaines camping, Conservation picnicking, Area consists fishing, boating, of 4253(Illinois and hunting acres and offers Department of Conservation 1976). The Goose Lake Prairie State Park consists of 2357 acres of which approximately 1513 acres are dedicated as an Illinois Nature Preserve. The park offers picnick-ing, hiking, and year-round nature study programs (Illinois Depart-
| |
| , ment of Conservation 1974). The Kankakee River State Park consist s of 2968 acres extending along the Kankakee River and offers camp ing, picnicking, fishing, boating, hiking, horse trails, hunting, and a summer nature study program (Illinois Department of Conserva-tion 1974). The Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail is cur-rently being developed for hiking, bicycling, and canoeing. The O
| |
| 2 2-7 l
| |
| l a
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENOMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 llf portion of the trail near the Channahon access is now completed and offers camping, canoeing, bicycling, and hiking (Illinois Depart-r:nt of Conservation 1975).
| |
| In addition to these state recreational facilities, there are snveral privately owned recreation areas within 10 miles of the Braidwood Station. Table 2.1-6 lists these recreation areas along cith their location, their total membership, and their estimated p$ak daily attendance. These clubs and parks provide a variety of recreational activities and attract people from outside the 10-mile radius.
| |
| The estimated peak daily attendance figures in Table 2.1-6 indicate that on a short-term basis, the population within 10 miles of the station could increase by 51,437 persons due to both state and private facilities. Should all these visitors be from outside the 10-mile radius, the total population within the 10-mile area would increase by 233%.
| |
| As listed in Table 2.1-7, there are 10 industries within 10 miles of the station. Approximately 860 persons are employed at these industries. Even if all these people come from outside the 10-mile 1 area, which is highly unlikely, the total population of this area would only increase during working hours by about 3%.
| |
| lll As shown in Table 2.1-8, the total of 16 schoolr within 10 miles of' the site had a total 1981-1982 enre11 ment of 5625 students and a 1 staff of 332 teachers. The great majority of students attending these schools reside within a 10-mile radius of the station.
| |
| The 1970 and projected pooulation distributions within the 10-mile radius are given in Table 2.1-9. This table includes the residen-tial population and the peak daily transient population resulting j from recreational activities within the 10-mile area.
| |
| 2.1.3 Uses of Adjacent Lands and Waters 2.1.3.1 Land Use 2.1.3.1.1 Land Use within 5 Miles The area within a 5-mile radius of the station includes land in Will, Kankakee, and Grundy Counties. This area as well as the remainder of Will, Kankakee, and Grundy Counties is predominantly agricultural. According to the 1974 farm statistics in Table 2.1-10, 64.8%, 89.7%, and 82.9% of the total land acreage in Will, '
| |
| Kankakee, and Grundy Counties, respectively, is farmland. The percentage of the total county land under cultivation is: Will County--55.1%, Kankakee County--79.3% and Grundy County--71.1%.
| |
| O 2.1-8 s
| |
| | |
| I
| |
| ' Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 i FEBRUARY 1983 j jg I The major crops grown in the thice counties are corn and soybeans.
| |
| Hay, oats, and wheat are also grown in the area. Table 2.1-11 gives the 1974 and 1975 acreage, yield, production, and dollar value of these crops for the three counties and the State of Illinois. In general, Grundy and Kankakee counties were more pro-ductive in 1975 than the state average, with the exception of corn yield in Kankakee County, which was slightly less than the state average. In 1975 Will County was less productive than the state average, with the exception of wheat yield, which was slightly higher than the state average. In general, the number of acres +
| |
| devoted to corn and soybeans in the three counties decreased be-tween 1974 and 1975 while the number of acres devoted to wheat, oats, and hay increased.
| |
| Corn and soybeans are the major crops grown within a 5-mile radius of the site. A " pick your own" christmas tree, blueberry, and strawberry farm is located approximately 3.5 miles southeast of the station.
| |
| O
| |
| () 2.1-8a
| |
| | |
| s 'Braidwood ER-OLS AMENOMENT 1 (j FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 2.1-2 (Cont ' d)
| |
| ~
| |
| 1980 SECTOR RAOIAL INTERVAL (miles)
| |
| DESIGNATION 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 0-5 0-10 N 83 806 376 28 3 930 1, 296 2,226 NNE 69 720 857 1,098 263 526 3,007 3,533 NE O 208 137 0 576 5,525 9 21 6,496 ENE O 25 25 20 263 1,632 333 1,965 E O 6 14 25 20 790 65 855 ESE O 6 17 17 45 216 85 301 SE O O 56 129 14 202 199 401 SSE O O 112 81 234 377 427 804
| |
| . S 0 0 0 3 6 1,057 9 1,066 SSW 0 3 6 20 64 954 93 1,047 SW 332 291 191 8 11 1,440 833 2,273 WSW 77 120 183 14 22 154 416 570 W 6 11 58 3 11 786 89 875 WNW 8 0 3 14 11 218 36 254 NW 6 8 14 1,525 598 816 2,151 2,967 NNW 11 257 85 1,568 344 650 2,265 2,915 g
| |
| . , J Sum for Radial Interval 592 2,461 2,134 4,553 2,485 16,323 12,225 28,548 I Cumulative Total to Outer Radius 592 3,053 5,187 9,740 12,225 28,548 12,225 28,548 Average Oensity (persons /mi 2) in Radial Region 188 261 136 207 88 69 156 91 4
| |
| 9 4
| |
| ( 2.1-17 i
| |
| , - - - - - , . . ,. --,.r.,, , - - - , , - , , - , ,, , , , , - . - - - y
| |
| | |
| CrCidwo0d ER-OLS ,
| |
| l 1
| |
| O TABLE 2.1-2 (Cont'd) 1990 SECTOR RADIAL INTERVAL (miles:
| |
| DESIGNATION 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 0-5 0-10 N 151 8'65 512 41 0 2,162 1,569 3,731 NNE 56 865 843 1,852 92 605 3,708 4,313 NE O 34 0 53 70 8,012 157 8,169 ENE O 24 53 29 485 2,J63 591 2,654 E 0 0 29 34 507 1,758 570 2,328 ESE O 0 41 29 70 287 140 427 SE O 0 5 29 9 272 43 315 SSE O O O 23 260 476 283 759 S 0 0 0 4 9 186 13 199 ,
| |
| SSW 0 0 5 20 10 1,345 35 1,380 SW 128 11 390 65 24 1,984 618 2,602 WSW 230 27 515 44 28 244 844 1,088 W 12 14 62 4 24 487 116 603 WNW 17 4 10 20 34 326 85 411 NW 0 14 38 576 3,974 677 4,602 5,279 NNW 12 575 194 874 215 82 1,S70 1,952 Gum for Radial Interval 606 2,433 2,697 3,697 5,811 20,966 15,244 36,210 Cumulative Total to Outer Radius 606 3,039 5,736 9,433 15,244 36,210 15,244 36,210 Avsrage Dengity (parsons /mi ) in Cuial Region 193 258 17; 168 206 89 194 115 2.1-18 O
| |
| | |
| i Braidwood ER-OLS AMENOMENT 1
| |
| "() FEBRUARY 1983 i
| |
| l TABLE 2.1-3 (' Cont ' d) 1980 SECTOR RADIAL INTERVAL (miles) ~
| |
| OESIGNATION 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 0-50 N 16,510 24,771 168,781 212,544 424,832 NNE 9,709 .115,056 179,879 834,638 1,142,815 NE 9,646 27,315 352,754 1,749,307 2,145,518
| |
| ; ENE 6,957 16,437 115,365 207,643 348,367 i E 3,416 10,581 9,982 17,724 42,558
| |
| : ESE 22,351 40,484 6,865 4,034 74,035 SE 3,449 4,806 1,992 9,951 20,599
| |
| -SSE 3,500 1,790 5,802 3,461 15,357 S 2,647 2,041 3,035 3,680 12,469 SSW 1,234 1,911 6,732 2,325 13,249 SW 5,20? 2,531 13,169 7,730 30,904
| |
| ; WSW 1,440 2,315 17,867 8,113 30,305 W 2,687 2,384 4,929 32,021 42,896 i WNW 1,447 9,246 21,354 6,087 38,388 NW 10,383 6,560 10,006 6,580 36,496 1 NWN 2,736 9,279 23,857 15,037 53,824 I ( Sum,for Radial Interval 103,313 277,507 942,369 3,120,875 4,472,612 Cumulative Total to Outer Radius 131,861 409,368 1,351,737 4,472,612 4,472,612 Average Density (persons /me 2) i in Radial Region
| |
| ~
| |
| 110 177 429 1,104 570 1
| |
| 4 2.1-23 4
| |
| m
| |
| + - - ..,--,w-w,--y, ----,mgw -y,.,.-- ,.m- m ,-,.cy- , , , . - - - - - _-.--__v.--.,-wof y- -- - -----, ,-- . - ,
| |
| | |
| s Ercidwood ER-OLS TABLE 2.1-3 (Cont'd) 9 1990 SECTOR RADIAL INTERVAL (miles)
| |
| DESIGNATION 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 0-50 N 18,941 40,891 256,778 325,592 645,933 NNE 20,808 166,172 353,636 1,468,689 2,013,618 NE 4,445 10,270 736,544 1,334,830 2,094,258 ENE 3,41d 14,203 153,646 223,879 397,792 E 5,083 10,010 9,175 12,912 39,508 ESE 14,853 57,467 8,029 3,757 84,533 SE 17,727 5,693 3,843 8,270 35,848 SSE 1,583 2,437 3,776 4,150 12,705 S 1,251 1,449 3,745 3,053 9,697 SSW 1,833 1,466 5,528 5,689 15,896 SW 4,014 2,047 14,022 5,414 28,099 WSW 1,149 3,017 12,211 6,011 23,476 W 1,825 1,790 21,417 31,541 57,176 WNW 2,544 7,923 13,493 3,553 27,924 NW 3,552 3,125 15,503 6,666 34,125 '
| |
| 4h NNW 4,321 8,596 49,849 5,035 69,753 Sum for Radial Interval 107,339 336,556 1,661,195 3,449,041 5,590,341 Cumulative
| |
| ( Total to Outer R:dius 143,549 480,105 2,141,300 5,590,341 5,590,341 Average Dmnsity (persons /mi )
| |
| in Radial R:gion 114 214 755 1,220 712 i
| |
| O 2.1-24
| |
| | |
| l Braidwood ER-OLS
| |
| () TABLE 2.1-3 (Cont'd) 2020 SECTOR RADIAL INTERVAL (miles)
| |
| DESIGNATION 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 0-50 N 25,210 54,621 412,469 433,144 930,408 NNE 27,178 221,285 531,181 1,812,753 2,597,527 NE 5,916 51,141 1,276,877 1,573,061 2,917,867 ENE 4,536 18,907 203,810 312,156 542,940 E 6,277 12,865 10,710 14,848 47,798 ESE 20,295 83.241 8,466 3,757 116,326 SE 25,114 5,830 6,478 12,978 50,818 SSE 1,741 2,437 3,776 4,460 13,425 S 1,376 1,449 3,745 3,053 9,886 SSW 2,581 1,466 7,712 7,873 21,467 SW 6,221 2,047 20,809 5,414 37,953' WSW 1,529 3,124 15,428 6,039 27,570 W 2,429 1,846 29,179 43,602 77,860 WNW 3,387 9,811 18,051 5,627 37,423
| |
| ,}
| |
| NW 4,710 3,171 19,480 6,678 41,067 NNW 5,618 10,698 65,341 5,035 89,289 Sum for Radial Interval 144,118 483,939 2,633,512 4,250,478 7,559,624 Cumulative Total to Outer >
| |
| Radius 191,695 675,634 3,309,146 7,559,624 7,559,624 Average Density 2 (persons /mi )
| |
| in Radial Region 153 308 1,198 1,503 963 A
| |
| U 2.1-27
| |
| -. - . - - . . . . . - . . - . . .. - . - - . - . . - . _ . - . ~ . . . _ - . . - - . . . . . .
| |
| | |
| TABLE 2.1-4 POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE BRAIDWOOD STATION Population Distance & Direction Center County 1980 From the Site Population Joliet Will (IL) 20 miles NNE 77,956 Kankakee Kankakee (IL) 20 miles ESE 30,141 Park Forest Bolingbrook Will & Cook (IL) 32 miles ENE 26,2?2 Will & DuPage (IL) 34 miles NNE 37,261 Tinley Park Cook (IL) 34 miles NE 26,171 Aurora Kane (IL) 35 miles N 81,293 m Chicago Heights Cook (IL) 35 miles ENE 37,026 2 Naperville DuPage & Will (IL) 37 miles N 42,330 E m Oak Forest Cook (IL) 37 miles NE 26,096 5 g Downers Grove Dupage (II.) 29 miles NNE 42,572 8.
| |
| L Harvey Cook (IL) 39 miles NE 35,810 5
| |
| Oak Lawn Cook (IL) 42 miles NE 60,590 g
| |
| Burbank Cook (IL) 43 miles NNE i
| |
| Lansing Cook (IL) 43 miles NE 28,462 1 y Wheaton 29,039 DuPage (IL) 44 miles N 43,043 Calumet City Cook (IL) 45 miles NE 39,697 Chicago (part) Cook (IL) 45 miles NE 3,005,072 Lcmbard DuPage (IL) 46 miles NNE 37,295 Hammond Lake (IN) 47 miles ENE 93,714 Idghland Lake (IN) 47 miles ENE 25,935 Elmhurst DuPage (IL) 48 miles NNE 44,276 Addison DuPage (IL) 49 miles NNE 29,759 Berwyn Cook (IL) 49 miles NNE 48,849 Cicero (part) Cook (IL) 49 miles NNE 61,232 Maywood Cook (IL) 49 miles NNE 27,998 11 e
| |
| v e G G
| |
| | |
| l p Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| () FEBRUARY 1983 l TABLE 2.1-5 i
| |
| URBAN CENTERS WITHIN 30 MILES OF-THE BRAIDWOOD STATION DISTANCE & DIRECTION 1980 URBAN CENTERa COUNTYb FROM THE SITE POPULATION l
| |
| Braidwood Will 1.5 miles NNE 3,429 Coal City Grundy 3.5 miles NW 3,028 Wilmington Will 6.0 miles NE 4,424 Morris Grundy 13 miles NW 8,833 Channahon Will 13 miles N 3,734 Owight Livingston 14 miles SW 4,146 Bourbonnais Kankakee 19 miles ESE 13,280 Bradley Kankakee 20 miles ESE 11,008 l Joliet Will 20 miles NNE 77,956 l Kankakee Kankakee 20 miles ESE 30,141 1 Shorewood Will 20 miles N 4,714 Manteno Kankakee 21 miles E 3,155 Crest Hill Will 22 miles NNE 9,252 Peotone Will 24 miles ENE 2,832 New Lenox Will 24 miles NE 5,792
| |
| () Frankfort Lockport Will Will 26 miles NE 26 miles NNE 4,357 9,170 Marseilles LaSalle 26 miles WNW 4,766 Plainfield Will 26 miles N 3,767 Mokena Will 27 miles NE 4,578 Romeoville Will 29 miles NNE 15,519 Yorkville Kendall 30 miles NNW 3,422 l
| |
| aAn urban center is defined as an incoporated or unincorporated place with a population of over 2500 according to the 1980 census, ball counties are in Illinois.
| |
| 2.1-29 (Z)
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS TABLE 2.1-6 MAJOR RECREAff 0NAL AREAS WITHIN 10 NTt8t3 0F THE BRAfDWOOD STATION DISTANCF &
| |
| DIRFCTION 1976 TOTAL ESTIMATED PEAR FRop' SITE A PENDANCga DAY ATTENDANCE RECREATIONAL Ran State Facilities Des Plaines Conservation Area 9 miles N 92,043 1.000 b Goose Lake Prairie State Park 9 miles NNW 60,723 462 e Eankakee River State Park 9 alles E 1.447.951 33,000 d Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail (Channahon Park Access) 10 miles N 99,000 800-1000 e 70TAL MEMBERSHIP Private Parks and Clubs (families)
| |
| Chicago Beagle Club f 0.5 mile SW 75 1.500 Braidwood Recreation Club 9 2 miles NE 2.350 600 South Wilmington Sportamen's Clubh 3 miles SSE 1,750 600 Area 1 Outdoor Club 3.5 miles N Wilmington Recreation Area Club! 3.5 miles NNE 750 3.000 Ponderosa Sports:sen's Club i 4 males S 207 15-25 South Walsington Figeman Beach and Park Club
| |
| * 4 miles SSW 1.800 2.100 Will County Sportsmen's Clubi 4 miles NE $50 800 Fossil Rock Recreataon
| |
| * d 5 miles NNE
| |
| * Club CECO Employees Recreation Association.
| |
| Inc.k 5 miles NNW 500 1.000 f 4,500 Coal City Area Club 5 miles NNW 1.600 Sun Recreation Club 5 miles S 6 miles S *
| |
| * Shannon Shores Cresden Lakes Sports Club (Public)I 7 miles NNW
| |
| * 350 RainbowCougcilScout Reservation 7 miles NW 6.000 1.000 Goose Lake Club" 7.5 miles NNW 736 500 Nute: Asterisk (*) indicates information not available.
| |
| I 'Sourcer allincts Department of Conservation (1976c).
| |
| b Source: Doyle (1977).
| |
| Source: Nyhoff (1977).
| |
| Source: Classen (1977).
| |
| *tource: Schwiesow (1977).
| |
| Source: Commonwealts. Edison Coepeny (1973).
| |
| ' Source: Chilean (1977).
| |
| Source: Dvorak (1977).
| |
| I source: Woolmane (1977).
| |
| SourcC: P'J?t9 3 Cb (IO775 Source: Frrek (1977).
| |
| Sourcea abert (1577).
| |
| 'Soerce- Saf iatti (le771.
| |
| 2.1-30
| |
| | |
| . . . _ . _ - - - - . . .~ - . - . . .. -. .
| |
| O O O T ABLE 2.1-7 INDUSTRIES WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE BRAIDWOOD STATION NAME OF FIRM LOCATION EMPLOYMENT PRODUCTS Baily Printing & Publishing Coal Citya 15 Commercial and job printing I Bowers-Siemon Chemicals Co. Coal City 30 Industrial lubricants and chemicals for wire industry e a 2 i Coal City Ready Mix Coal City 8 Ready-mix Cement E 7 DeMert & Dougherty Inc. Coal City 110-115 Aerosols, etc. la Brownie Special Products Co. Gardnerb 50 Pizza crusts .ho WESCOM, INC. Gardner 189 Small electronic components
| |
| , Lindamood Sheet Metal Wilmingtonc 6 Custom sheet metal ducts 1 and fittings f Earl A. Muser & Co. Wilmington under 5 Tools and dies ,
| |
| Personal Products Co. Wilmington 300-350 Hygienic products Division of Johnson &
| |
| Johnson Commonwealth Edison
| |
| , Training Center Wilmington 100 Production training average @
| |
| (RR 2, Essex Rd.) enrollment 150 trainees W Source: Commonwealth Edison Company (1982).
| |
| ! aCoal City is 3.5 miles northwest of the station. hk"
| |
| , bGardner is 5.5 miles southwest of the station. V j cWilmington is 6.0 miles northeast of the station.
| |
| I i
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 O
| |
| TABLE 2.1-8 EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS WITNIN 10 MILES OF THE BRAIDWOOD STATION DISTANCE AND DIRECTION ENROLDENT STAFF INSTITUTIONS FROM SITE CRADES 1981-1982 1981-1982 Braidwood. Illinois Braidwood Elementary 1.4 miles NNE K-8 712 37 and Middle School Reed Custer High 1.4 miles NNE 9-12 365 23 Bracev111e. Illinois 2.0 miles SW K-8 164 11 Braseville Elementary Coal City. I'.linois 3.5 miles NW K-5 742 42 coal City Elementary 3.5 miles NW 9-12 471 32 Coal City High 3.5 miles NW 6-8 369 24 Coal City Middle Essex. Illinois Essex Elementary 5.0 miles SSE 1-5 75 4 1 South Wilmington, Illinois South Wilmington Censolidated Elementary 5.2 miles SSW K-8 114 7 Gardner. Illinois Gard er Elemetstory 5.3 miles SW K-8 256 13 GarJner-South Wilmington Township High School 5.3 miles SW 9-12 264 20 Cater Park. Illinois coster Park Eles.*ntary 5.3 miles E K-8 172 13 Wilmington, 111inois Bruning Elementarf 6.0 miles NE K-5 287 13 L. J. Stevens Middle 6.0 miles NE 6-8 390 24 Wilmington High 6.1 miles NE 9-12 556 35 St. Rose Schoola 6.2 miles NE 1-8 222 12 Booth Central Elementary 6.3 miles NE K-5 466 22 Source: Illinois State Board of Education (1962).
| |
| aSource: Flore11a (1982).
| |
| O 2.1-32
| |
| | |
| Uraidwood ER-OLS
| |
| ('T V
| |
| j TABLE 2.1-31 -
| |
| REPORTED CATCH OF FISH TAKEN FROM
| |
| , NAVIGATION POOLS OF THE ILLINOIS RIVER WITHIN 50 MILES DOWNSTREAM FROM THE SITE BY COMMERCIAL FISHERMEN STARVED ROCK POOL" PEORIA POOL (lb)
| |
| SPECIES 1973 1974 1973b 1974C 2
| |
| Carp - - 10,310 53,832 Buffalo - - 10,098 140,159 Drum - - 219 Catfish - - 21,313 j
| |
| 4 Bullheads - - 5,796 21,237
| |
| [ Paddlefish - - 15,200
| |
| . TOTAL - - 26,204 251,960 i O I
| |
| i 1
| |
| 1 i
| |
| i J
| |
| i I
| |
| i 4
| |
| "Not fished commercially in 1973 or 1974.
| |
| " Source: Illinois Department of Conservation, Fisheries Division (1973).
| |
| U Source: Illinois Department of Conservation, Fisheries Division (1974).
| |
| 2.1-57
| |
| . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ , _ . _ . . _ . , _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ , _ . . _ _ _ - _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ ~ - _ - _ - . - . . _ . _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 O
| |
| TABLE 2.1-32 INDUSTRIAL INTAKES WITHIN 50 RADIAL Mt!.ES DOWNSTREAN FROM THE SRAIDWOOD STATION APPROXIMATE RIVER APPROXIMATE RADIAL MILE DISTANCE FROM AVERACE DISTANCE (MILES) AND THE S!TE TO THE WITHDRAWAL AVERACE INDUSTRT DIRECTION FROM THE INTAEE AND DISCRARGE RATE RETURN RATE WATER AND WATER SOURCE SITE TO TME INDUSTRT POINTS (spe) (Rpe) USACE Jstist Army Asmunition 8 NE 13 2,083 t,666 Industrial Pitntab (Keckakee River)
| |
| Orssk a Station 11 Nlrd intake - 16 232,000 216,006 Industrial Units 1. 2, 6 3' discharge - 15 (intes.e-Kankakee River discharge-11tinois River)
| |
| R$ichold Chemicals Inc.d 12 KNW 17 860 104 Industrial (tilinois River)
| |
| Cottins Cenerating 13 NW discharge - 19 37,000 25,600 tadustrial Section* intake - 21 (Illinois River) sickse IndustriesI 23 WNW 37 1,389 1,389 Industrial (tilinois River)
| |
| LaSalle County Station 25 W 37 41,517 22.935 Industrial Units 1 & 28 (Illinois River)
| |
| Kalsic Agricultural 24 WNW 38 12,000 12,000 Industrial Checic at shi i (tilinois River)
| |
| National Siscuit Co.3 26 WNW 40 216 75 Industrial (Illinois River)
| |
| Wrseilles Hydroelectric 26 WNW 40 Negligible Negligible Industrial Planth (11tinois River)
| |
| Bestelom Corporationl 48 W 64 300 150 Industrial (111snois River) Sanitary alatske not currently being used because of standby status of plant.
| |
| bSource: Forsyth (1977).
| |
| cSou rce: U.S. Atomic Energy Couniasion (1973).
| |
| dSource: Basil (1977).
| |
| ' Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1974).
| |
| Isource: Drill (1977).
| |
| SSturce: Coassonwealth Edison Company (1977b).
| |
| h 3ource: Eetly (1983).
| |
| I Rivzr water purification system deactivated. i 3 Source: Surton (1977).
| |
| kSource: Walden (1976).
| |
| I$ource: Rankosik (1977).
| |
| O 2.1-58
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1
| |
| ' FEBRUARY 1983 (m.
| |
| y " "',' -M [' ' t.~{.5 . p n W '. '# ,
| |
| f DINES sh'?k.t? ~3j /c' Akhl g~f, ~\ _
| |
| I rU ff
| |
| ,.. q;.l ' _ ~q
| |
| ,-4 ce cin, ,.
| |
| f., g.a,.
| |
| ,su i, e. ~r y , ,. #g .g P+g% Qi .......5 g; , - .
| |
| sm >x,q, .
| |
| g
| |
| %W ^v p. ; . \
| |
| .- C& ~,
| |
| W g.g p W' . ,.
| |
| ' Qtut. D \ ,
| |
| ~9fy s -
| |
| -)'
| |
| b a j <
| |
| I)iTf{g-h,=g,ij d :
| |
| 3,=,=2
| |
| 'N'hg1
| |
| ' 'x E!.c-Un (f..: ~ f RiACTURS.. .
| |
| W M
| |
| q ~ rgS _b. @.:" ~ . . i' \
| |
| : .'O
| |
| .a egermTP !" .. . .. . l. i.:.*:& A
| |
| ".f (
| |
| ,B i 9.RAIDWOOD,, SITE ;. .
| |
| ~o. - Q, l,
| |
| ~
| |
| r 0l,5
| |
| .>.;; i: :. , . _-
| |
| . ?
| |
| ; ? n. . k ] . . '. ,o oae~Qsgh W3% WTy
| |
| %& c
| |
| %@''''S'""" -e . )) ~~ ,,.] ,
| |
| essen ys JR ^ 'd
| |
| : s. m ninston ,_,-
| |
| 1[-' 'd [ t ~s m-
| |
| % (
| |
| '/. x e p0 C) E <
| |
| )
| |
| l
| |
| ,R...
| |
| ~,' ,
| |
| g i . 3 ' 0 E
| |
| 5 0 1 2 3 IR AllW809 NUCLE AR GENERATING STRileN SCALE IN MILES IMliS 1 &2 ENVitONAAENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE s FIGURE 2.1-2 .
| |
| LOCATION OF SITE IN RELATION TO KANKAKEE RIVER AND COUNTY BOUNDARIES l
| |
| l _ _ - _ _ - - .
| |
| | |
| {
| |
| \\
| |
| l \\
| |
| /~x-.
| |
| ll __ __)
| |
| /.
| |
| /, .o w JW'.w:w '1
| |
| _ . - / g f._ g l
| |
| .w.w p .
| |
| %"'' .
| |
| * f', I ww ,,
| |
| /
| |
| l E"t'S"' ,/
| |
| - 4 g -som N,,
| |
| ( = =.a. .1 : = v.c3 == %=
| |
| =
| |
| E55fNTtAL C00LueG POND -g EN ,
| |
| ouse-
| |
| .S.c ,
| |
| Nfg%,,, 'Tia oe'^=< glE E@ !?>3 D,* !b .o.d GODLEY ' l
| |
| (#0 N e
| |
| #3 c#
| |
| N i
| |
| E so.i eng N
| |
| i
| |
| \
| |
| t
| |
| | |
| f AMENDMENT 1 ,
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 l
| |
| I--Nat6 mi W
| |
| ,; , ]*,3,,,, RESTRICTED AREA BOUNDARY
| |
| / AND SITE BOUNDARY
| |
| /)- 32o.00 N50.co 290.oo 28o.oo 770.no o 'y _ - . . . .- -
| |
| rEAST enApeCM Eo.co iso.co
| |
| ***C
| |
| { ao.m ,/ -
| |
| , /
| |
| m@,
| |
| eo, = ,,,,,,
| |
| tro *-.
| |
| . . _ o.m 7 , . .
| |
| ~
| |
| pW
| |
| /'
| |
| ///////' e,o.w
| |
| .l \
| |
| 300. ..
| |
| oo j 90 00-.
| |
| : o. = .
| |
| 1 DlKE EL. j!
| |
| 600'-0" iro.co PON { L. l e so.oo me.oo ,e. m .2o. oo.m o. = mo.
| |
| MWAV
| |
| ** * .. __cm awo w_
| |
| Scole in Feet El.5
| |
| = *N BRAIOWOOD NUCLE AR CFNER4 TING ST ATION UNITS 1 &2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE FIGURE 2.1-3
| |
| " SITE BOUNDARY, RESTRICTED AREA B0UNDARY, AND COOLING POND i I,
| |
| | |
| $ k f M 17800 x I
| |
| 7 sf)'
| |
| .=f
| |
| (
| |
| 15100 2000 4 8
| |
| EILEEN 6'O 1800 4300 >+
| |
| 3000 COA CITY DIAMOND 139 30 113 1400 g - -
| |
| 1800 -
| |
| f I og\ f. . . B R AIDWOOD g S z i 1850 1250 -
| |
| r
| |
| $. ,d ai 1700 1400 1300 e 5 4
| |
| 'O
| |
| [ 66 CUSTER PARK
| |
| '\'"'47 g lg G ODLEY
| |
| \
| |
| 13700 900 BRACEVILLE ,
| |
| 4-55 1000 b SITE 4 )
| |
| 1 z
| |
| 8 4'q o WILL COUNTYg i 14000
| |
| >- KANKAKEE COUNTY [
| |
| z 2
| |
| 00 ARONE l
| |
| /o'&
| |
| EAST B ROOKLYN SOUTH E9 _
| |
| ESSEX ;
| |
| WILMINGTON 7
| |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES j SCALE
| |
| )
| |
| (
| |
| (
| |
| Q:
| |
| I
| |
| _ _--- _L__ - - - - - - - - - _ _ . . - - . . _ . _ . . . _ - - - - . _ . _ - - - -
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 l D)
| |
| )KEE RIVER LEGEND:
| |
| ++++ RAILROADS INTERSTATES U.S. HIGHWAYS STATE HIGHWAYS 1650 1971 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME S CITIES & VILLAGES
| |
| {
| |
| E t g
| |
| )
| |
| NS i
| |
| IRAIBWO4B NICLE AR SENERATING STATitN INITS 1 & 2 i ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE FIGURE 2.1-6 l
| |
| MAJOR ROADS AND PAILROADS WITHIN 5 MILES OF THE STATION
| |
| | |
| 1 AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| )
| |
| N O \
| |
| O NNW NNE R:i z '
| |
| Si u.
| |
| NW wi NE Ei l E!
| |
| c: (
| |
| EILEEN i CARBON HILL (569) q WNW (406) m DIAMOND ENE
| |
| "" ; WILMINGTON (4424)
| |
| C0AL CITY i BRAIDWOOD (3028) i (3429)
| |
| G0DLEYl W -
| |
| (373) :s 5 -
| |
| E p SITE
| |
| \ BRACEV II IN MILES ]
| |
| WILL COUNTY
| |
| ,. . . (............. ... . . . . . . . .
| |
| 4 GMDNER i j WSW (1322) i ESE I S. WILMINGTON (747) gi ESSEX gj (463)
| |
| : Si SW wi SE Ei a'
| |
| : *!:i SSW SSE S
| |
| 3 0 4 s
| |
| 2 6 8 1o
| |
| ( l lNDIC AT ES 1980 CEN SU S POPUL ATION j BR AIDWOOD NUCLEAR CENERATING STAil0N UNITS 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE FIGURE 2.1-8 O CITIES AND VILLAGES LOCATED WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE STATION t
| |
| , . , - . -.- , . . - - - - - - - - . . r - - - - . . . - - - ~ -
| |
| ----v.----~-w=-wv---~~r -= - - * ~ ' ' -
| |
| * I l
| |
| AMENDMENT 1 l FEBRUARY 1983 O' NW j ' ADDMELbRST l KANE COUNTY WE ON y MkthR0 i iDU PAGE PARKi BERWYN'
| |
| : iCOUNTY N 72 --
| |
| hW ! AURORA gi g 9h'yfRS 'CH'I'C''AGO. NE B
| |
| ;.................g.3.g.yy.... OgQ'''% 3 i ! 80LINGBR00K i (K 90AK .3 s
| |
| ...s.................! g
| |
| ~~..:F REST LAWN : CALUMET j KENDALL i i g g Sj CITY J
| |
| COUNTY i i....k HARVEY g GHAMMOND g \ ENE WNW ! TINLEYi LANS!NG =
| |
| PARK -
| |
| HIGHLAND
| |
| ! ! JOLIET
| |
| ;...................; !.~. 9 SCHICAGO - HEIGHTS PARK -
| |
| FOREST :
| |
| : WILL COUNTY = LAKE LA SALLEi COUNTY i : COUNTY
| |
| : : 10 MILE : 50 MILE 3
| |
| GRUNDY : :
| |
| W ~
| |
| l COUNTY kSITE --
| |
| KANKAKEE COUNTY
| |
| $:3 -
| |
| E
| |
| ; j. =
| |
| : j g...........*,,..e i :
| |
| . . . p....................:..................... -
| |
| KANKAKEE gg w : NEWTON
| |
| : i ! -s < - COUNTY i i i H:
| |
| I ! i...............................................M: .....g s WSW
| |
| !'- ~.!; ! i *3E ESE
| |
| ~j j LIVINGSTON COUNTY ioci i o:5 z- 3. ,z.i
| |
| : : a: z :
| |
| i i28! ":
| |
| i j "j IR0QU0IS di
| |
| : 8
| |
| . COUNTY :
| |
| ! j ! SE SW i : i s....................: j SSW , i SSE s
| |
| =
| |
| a
| |
| =
| |
| =4 L
| |
| 0 10 20 30 40 50 l I I I I I MILES BR AIDWOOD NUCLEAR CENERAllNC ST ATION UNITS 1 &2 ENVIRONMENT AL REPORT - OPER ATING tlCENSE STAGE FIGURE 2.1-10 0 POPULATION CENTERS LOCATED WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE STATION .
| |
| 1 i
| |
| | |
| Broidwo d ER-OLS i
| |
| estimates indicated the presence of relatively large numbers of fish at mid-stream above Transect 3.
| |
| () concentration of fish may have, in part, accounted for the low fish numbers encountered in the near-shore regions of the river.
| |
| This mid-stream 1 Population estimates based on the total number of fish captured
| |
| ! and recaptured were relatively low when compared with the total l number of fish collected during the survey. Although the total number of fish marked and recaptured using this technique does not necessarily have to be large (Ricker 1958) , the obvious lack of sufficient numbers of marked and recaptured fish made the
| |
| ; results less reliable.
| |
| l 2.2.1.11.4 Select Species i
| |
| j Age, growth, food habits, parasites, and condition factors of
| |
| ; rock bass, longear sunfish, smallmouth bass, largemouth bass, and
| |
| : white crappie from the Kankakee River and Horse Creek were
| |
| ! studied in 1974. The growth rates of these fish varied from f air i to good when compared with those of other fish populations
| |
| ! described in literature. Also, except in the case of white l crappie, they had relatively higher condition factors (see Table i
| |
| : 2. 2-4 9) . Annual increments in length varied from year to year.
| |
| ! The majority of fish seemed to be growing well in 1974.
| |
| i
| |
| : Select fish species of the Kankakee River and Horse Creek f ed on j a wide assortment of aquatic invertebrates and, in several cases, j on ninnows and other fish (see Figures 2.2-24 through 2.2-27) .
| |
| () Aquatic invertebrates were available in the study area throughout
| |
| ; the study period. Some invertebrate species were fed upon
| |
| ; selectively. In several cases, the changing feeding habits of j fish with the season was largely attributed to the seasonal j fluctuation of the benthic community.
| |
| i Fish collected from the Kankakee River and Horse Creek were i subject to parasitic infections. The degree of infection varied j among species. Parasitic ef fects were not severe, as indicated j by the growth patterns and condition f actors (see Table 2.2-50) .
| |
| 4 In several cases fish were shown to host more than one species of l parasite at one time. The parasitic organisms encountered in the
| |
| {
| |
| 3 study area were mostly trematodes ( flukes) .
| |
| j 2.2.1.11.5 Eqqs and Larvae '
| |
| Fish eggs are commonly classified as being buoyant, semi-buoyant, '
| |
| or demersal (on the bottom) (Ricker 1971) . The collection of
| |
| ) eggs and larvae during the survey was done using surface and bottom plankton net tows and bottom pumping. These collection methods were used so that the three types of eggs would be
| |
| ; represented in the sampling. Eggs collected by plankton nets are most likely buoyant or semi-buoyant, and those collected by bottom pumping are primarily demersal. A limiting or complicating factor in the assessment of fish eggs and larvae in any area is that eggs and larvae may be concentrated in spawning
| |
| (
| |
| 4 2.2-19
| |
| | |
| Brcidwood ER-OLS AMENDLENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 areas rather than widely distributed. Tht: collection of adequate numbers of demersal eggs using traditional collecting methods was difficult, and the movement of fish between dif f erent bodies of lll I water (nuch as the Kankakee River and Horse Creek) made it almost impossible to define population boundaries during breeding pariods.
| |
| Fish eggs and larvae were collected during the first sampling period (May 2, 1974) at Transect 3, which indicates that spring opawning had already occurred by this time (see Table 2. 2-51) .
| |
| L;rvae were collected at Transect 3 as late as June 27, 1974, Thus, the spring spawning period started before May 2 and extended beyond mid-June 1974. Larvae collected during the first port of the sampling probably belonged to early spring spawners, whereas' eggs and larvae collected in the latter part of the curvey were from early summer spawners.
| |
| It is known that different fish species have different temperatures that induce spawning. For example, the spawning temperatures for rock bass, longear sunfish, and smallmouth bass have been reported tc be 200 to 210 C, 240 to 300 C, and 130 to 210 C, respectively (Scott and Crossman 1973) . It was therefore not unusual that fish eggs and larvae were collected throughout the sampling period.
| |
| Bottom plankton tows and bottom pumping produced a small number of eggs (15) and larvae (54) ; none were collected using surf ace pla nkton tows. the number of eggs and larvae collected per cubic meter of water at each sampling location is presented in Table 2.2-51. Although some larvae were collected at each transect, no eggs were obtained from Transects 2 and 5 during the entire sampling period (see Table 2.2- 51) .
| |
| More eggs and larvae were collected from Horse Creek (Tra nsect 4) during May 1974 than at all the Kankakee River transects (Transects 2, 3, and 5) combined, which suggests that spawning was more intensive in Horse Creek in May 1974 than in the Kankakee River at this time. Conditions in Horse Creek appear to te more ecologically favorable for early spawning than the Kankakee River conditions. Horse Creek is shallcw (mean depth of ,
| |
| : 4. 6 feet) , having relatively warm water (ranging between 2. 80 and 24.20 C during March through June) and low flow. Fish movements between the creek and the river were suggested from the observations made during the 1974 through 1975 study. Both the
| |
| , creek and some areas of the river appear to provide nurse xy l grounds f or eggs and larvae.
| |
| l 2.2.2 Terrestrial Environment 2.2.2.1 Jntroduction The 4454 acres of the Braidwood site included 1021 acres of cultivated fields, 471 acres of f allow fields, 395 acres of open 1 woodlands, and 2567 acres of strip-sine spoil. The ecology of 2.2-20 9
| |
| f
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OlS The unmined areas are ,
| |
| ( )cach ofJ these cf fected areas by past is quite distinct.
| |
| agricultural practices and soil types. The !
| |
| tined areas are aff ected by the acidity and . texture of the -
| |
| curface material, -slope, ridge heights, and the amount of time elasped since mining occurred. The type of reclamation practiced l
| |
| . clso af fects strip-mined areas. l t
| |
| The flora and fauna observed during the baseline survey and their' :
| |
| interactions were summarized by indicating their relative !
| |
| positions within a generalized food web for the Braidwood site ,
| |
| (see Figure 2. 2- 28) . This food web schematic considered the site i
| |
| , as a .whole without distinguishing between the .various habitats .
| |
| ! campled. It indicates general relationships between vegetation, '
| |
| herbivores, omnivores, insectivores, and _ carnivores found on the t site. Species grouped within boxes are generally similar in food preference, but a broad range of nutrient options may be represent ed. Although human beings are not included, it should be recognized that they are not only an omnivore in the web, but that they also influence the web by their effects on the habitat of . the individual species.
| |
| Initial ecological studies at the Braidwood site began in the fall of 1972 and continued on a seasonal basis during the winter, ;
| |
| spring, and summer of 1973. The results and projections of the j construction inpact concluded from these studies for the fall, t winter, and spring surveys are included in Subsections 2. 7.1 and ;
| |
| 4.1.5 of the Braidwood Station Environmental Report - Con- l C'structionPermitStage (ER-CPS) . The impact was assessed in the .
| |
| ER-CPS and the Braidwood Final Environmental Statement (FES) . i The summer 1973 survey confirmed the minimal environmental impact i as described in both the ER-CPS and FES. t i
| |
| To augment the initial (1972 through 1973) baseline study, a >
| |
| program was designed for the 1974 through 1975 period. The .
| |
| , results and conclusions presented in the 1974 through 1975 Final I Terrestrial Monitoring Report further support the impact !'
| |
| assessment presented in both the ER-CPS and the FES. The information obtained during these 2 years of baseline monitoring ,
| |
| is summarized in the following subsections. [
| |
| 2.2.2.2 obiectives of the 1972 through 1973 Baseline Survey I The major objectives of. the terrestrial baseline study (1972 ;
| |
| through 1973) were as follows: '
| |
| : a. to record and describe "important" species of flora and f auna in the site area during all four seasons of -
| |
| , the year; i
| |
| : b. to provide. baseline data that could be used to develop a monitoring program for detecting impacts of l plant construction and operation on the environment; ;
| |
| ! 2.2-21 l
| |
| w -- r, , - - > . , - , - , , , - - , - , - - , , - - - - - -- - - - ,
| |
| | |
| 1 Braidwood EB-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| : c. to delineate the different types of habitats near the Braldwood site environs; lh
| |
| : d. to determine the ecological relationships between the biotic and abiotic parameters present; and
| |
| : e. to of f er recommendations concerning ef fects of construction on any aunique or unusual" plants or animals found within zones of direct impact.
| |
| 2.2.2.3 obiectives of the 1974 through 1975 Baseline Survey The six major study objectives of the terrestrial baseline study (1974 through 1975) were the following:
| |
| : a. to document existing biota in recently purchased areas that were not evaluated during baseline surveys;
| |
| : b. to evaluate the biotic components of areas that will be subject to construction activity for station and switchyard facilities;
| |
| : c. to observe annual fluctuation in the biological density represented within the site;
| |
| : d. to expand the biological data base for predicting impacts associated within the site;
| |
| : e. to provide background data for the initiation of a specific program to evaluate the impact of site development on migratory waterfowl; and
| |
| : f. to identify significant parameters to be measured or monitored in later studies to provide continuing estimates of real and potential impacts.
| |
| 2.2.2.4 Summary of the 1972 through 1973 Baseline Survey The following results were based on the field baseline studies
| |
| =onducted from the fall of 1972 through the summer of 1973 in the environs of the Braidwood site.
| |
| : a. The 4454 acre Braidwood site included 1021 acres of cultivated fields, 471 acres of fallow fields, 395 g acres of open woodlands, and 2567 acres of strip-mine spoil.
| |
| : b. The climax community for the site was primarily tall-
| |
| , grass prairie with some areas of deciduous forest.
| |
| i There are now, however, no climax communities l remaining within the site boundaries, and all of the l unmanaged natural communities are in some stage of succession toward climax. Plant diversity was O
| |
| 2.2-22 l
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| r Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| (_s) FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| .Long-term joint frequency distributions of wina direction and wind speed for each Pasquill stability class at Peoria (1966-1975) are suiamarized in Table 2.3-30.
| |
| 2.3.5.4 Inversions and High Air Pollution Potential The 13 years of data (1952-1964) on vertical temperature gradients from Argonne (Moses and Bogner 196') provide a measure of thermo-dynamic stability, or mixing potential. Weather records from many stations in United States have also been analyzed with the objec-tive of characterizing atmospheric dispersion potential (Hosler 1961; Holzworth 1972) .
| |
| The seasonal frequencies of inversions based below 500 feet for the Braidwood Station. area are shown by Hosler as follows:
| |
| Inversions Below 500 Feet Percentage of 24-Hour Periods Percentage With at least One Season of Total Hours Hour of Inversion O snria9 Summer so 31 6>
| |
| 81 1 Fall 38 72 Winter 28 48 Since northern Illinois has a primarily continental climate, inver-sion frequencies are closely related to the diurnal cycle. The less frequent occurrence of storms in summer produces a larger frequency of nights with short-duration inversion conditions.
| |
| Holzworth's data give estimates of the average depth of vigorous vertical mixing, which give an indication of the vertical depth of atmosphere available for mixing and dispersion of effluents. For the Braidwood Station region, the seasonal values of the mean daily mixing depths (in meters) are as follows:
| |
| Mean Daily Mixing Depths Season Morning Afternoon Spring 480 1500 Summer 320 1600 Fall 400 1200 Winter 470 610 0 2.3-21
| |
| | |
| BrCidwood ER-CLS When daytime (maximum) mixing depths are shallow, pollution potential is highest. g The following list presents Argonne data on the frequency of inversion conditions in the 5.5- to 144-foot layer above the ground expressed as a percentage of the total observations, and cn the average duration of inversion conditions:
| |
| Month Inversion Frequency First Hour final Hour Jan. 30.5% 5 p.m. 8 a.m.
| |
| Apr. 33.1% 6 p.m. 6 a.m.
| |
| Jul. 42.4% 6 p.m. 6 a.m.
| |
| Oct. 48.4% 5 p.m. 7 a.m.
| |
| Nocturnal inversions begin at dusk and normally continue until daylight the next day. The inversion frequency for January at Argonne compares well with Hosler's winter value, and the f all ceason shows a maximum in both Argonne and Hosler's data. Fall clso has the longest period of inversion conditions.
| |
| Holzworth has also presented statistics on the frequency of episodes of high air-pollution potential, as indicated by low mixing depth and light winds (Holzworth 1972) . His data indicate that, during the 5-year period from 1960 through 1964, Obe region .
| |
| I including the Braidwood Station experienced no episodes of 2 days Bh or longer with mixing depths less than 500 meters and winds less than 2 meters per second. There were two such episodes with winds remaining less than 4 meters per second. For mixing heights less than 1000 meters and winds less than 4 meters per second, there were about nine episodes in the 5-year period lasting 2 days or more, but no episodes lasting 5 days or more.
| |
| Holzworth's data indicate that northern Illinois is in a relatively favorable dispersion regime with respect to the low frequency of extended periods of high air pollution potential.
| |
| 2.3.5.5 Topographical Description Figure 2. 3-22 is a topographic map showing the area surrounding the Braidwood Station. Figures 2.3-23 and 2.3-24 show topographic cross sections in each of the 16 compass point directions radiating from the site. It can be seen that the station, at an elevation of approximately 600 feet above mean sea level (MSL) is at one of the highest points within a 5-mile radius. The lowest points within 5 miles of the site are about 550 feet above MSL. Terrain in the vicinity of the Braidwood Station f alls of f except in the northeast clockwise through the south-southeast directions (see Figure 2.3-24) . The slope from the station site to the lower points is gradual.
| |
| }
| |
| O 2.3-22 l
| |
| i
| |
| | |
| .. . . .. . _ -. - . _ . . _ .- .. ~ .
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 :
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 ,
| |
| . 2.4 HYDROLOGY 2.a.1 surface Water Hydrolooy 2.4.1.1 Sit"-
| |
| I
| |
| : The site for the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Etation - Units 1 5 2 (Braidwood Station) is about 8 -
| |
| 's southwest of the town of
| |
| ~Custer Park,'which is on the K&.' r - Rivet. It is in a strip-mined region characterized by many water-filled trenches and ponds. Cooling water for the station is supplied by a cooling l pond that covers one of the strip-mined areas. The pond has a j normal pool elevation of 595 feet above mean sea level (MSL) with a surface area of 2537 acres or 3.96 square miles. The water
| |
| ;; surf ace area constitutes 75% of the pond's total drainage area. of . 1 5.3 square miles. The pond is contained by dikes that all have a top elevation of 600 ' feet MSL except for one part of the dike just south of the station, which has a top elevation of 602.5 ,
| |
| feet MSL. The statAon grade elevation is 600.0 feet MSL. Site characteristics and changes to existing drainage features are ,
| |
| shown in Figure 2.4-1.
| |
| Granary Creek joins the Mazon River 1 mile southwest of the site, ,
| |
| and about 4 miles south of the station facilities at the north !
| |
| end of the pond. Crane Creek is a tributary of Granary Creek. '
| |
| Both creeks have an intermittent. water flow. According to records for watersheds.of similar configuration in the region (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] 1961-1976), the average annual
| |
| , O . flow is 0.73 cubic feet per second (cfs) per square mile, or about 38 cfs for both creeks at the Kankakee-Grundy county line.
| |
| The estimated 100-year peak discharge is 3200 cfs at the same [
| |
| location. Figure 2.4-2 shows the drainage area of Crane and Granary creeks.
| |
| Horse Creek lies 2.5 miles east of the site at its closest point.
| |
| It has a drainage area of 148 square miles at its point of
| |
| : discharge to the Kankakee River at Custer Park. The creek's !
| |
| t average annual flow is cbout 110 cfs, and its 100-year flood peak l
| |
| , is approximately 9200 cfs at its junction with the Kankakee !
| |
| River. l l
| |
| ; The Mazon River lies 5 miles west of the north end of the site. l A tributary of the Illinois River, the Mazon River has a drainage !
| |
| area of about 220 square miles at Mazon, 2 miles west of the site. The average annual flow at the gauge is approximately 134 cfs. The estimated 100-year flood peak is 13,600 cfs.
| |
| 2.4.1.2 Kankakee River Basin Characteristics
| |
| , The Braidwood Station is on a low ridge southwest of the Kankakee River and east of the Mazon River. The Kankakee River joins the ;
| |
| Des Plaines River about 10 miles directly north of the site to
| |
| . form the Illinois River at river mile 273. The Mazon River flows into the Illinois River at river mile 264. There are no ponds or 2.4-1 6
| |
| f i
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-SLS 1ckes in the region except for the ponded water in the strip-Cined areas around Braidwood and Godley.
| |
| The Kankakee River rises near South Bend, Indiana, and flows couthwestward 111 miles to Aroma Park, Illinois, where it is j ined by ite largest tributary, the Iroquois River. The K nkakee River watershed is shown in Figure 2.4-3. The Kankakee then flows northwestward 38 miles to join with the Des Plaines River. The Kankakee basin is 130 miles long and 70 miles wide at its widest point. The Kankakee River drains 5280 square miles, 2155 in Illinois and 3125 in Indiana. The maximum relief in the basin is 375 feet MSL between the mouth of the river and the high point of the drainage divide near valparaiso, Indiana. Low ridges of glacial origin define most of the drainage divide.
| |
| Within Illinois, the Kankakee River is 59 miles long, and has widths ranging from 200 to 800 feet and depths ranging from 1 to 15 feet. The total fall from the state line to the river mouth 10 127 feet. Channel slopes vary from less than 0.5 foot per mile to over 4 feet per mile. The channel slope in the site area io approximately 2 feet per mile. Most of the riverbed in Illinois is on or near bedrock. Relatively thin layers of sand cnd gravel overlie the bedrock with some small areas of silt.
| |
| There are two dams on the Kankakee River. One dam is at Wilmington, about 4 miles downntream from the intake point; the other dam is at Kankakee, about 15 miles upstream of the intake point.
| |
| The Wilmington dam is 11 feet high and forms a pool 2 miles long.
| |
| The Kankakee dam is 12 feet high and forms a pool 6 miles long. lll Both dams are constructed of solid concrete on bedrock. Neither dam is used for power production now although both dams were used for power generation at one time. There are no other control structures on the streams in the Braidwood Station vicinity (Barker et al. 1967).
| |
| The Kankakee River flow is gauged near Wilmington, 8.78 miles downstream from the Braidwood Station's withdrawal point and 5.5 miles upstream of the river mouth; the drainage area at the gauge 10 5150 square miles (USGS 1961-1976). The average flow rate for the Kankakee River at the intake is 3952 cfs. The corresponding elevation is 538 feet MSL and the average river velocity is 2.1 feet per second (fps).
| |
| Figure 2.4-4 is a bathymetric chart of the Kankakee River in the crea of the Braidwood Station's intake and discharge structures.
| |
| The data that were used to construct the bottom profiles shown in the figure were obtained from a hydrographic survey conducted by the Illinois Division of Water Resources Management (IDWRM) in April 1970 (Pitkin 1973) . The IDWRM study covered a 10-mile caction of the Kankahee River above Wilmington, Illinois; Figure 2.4-4 shows 7000 feet of that 10 ' miles.
| |
| }
| |
| O 2.4-2
| |
| | |
| Craidwood ER-OLS
| |
| () TABLE 2.4-14 QUALITY OF GROUNDWATER IN THE GLACIAL DRIFT (all Values except pH are in mg/ liter)
| |
| MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE CONCEN- CONCEN- CONCEN-PARAMETER TRATION TRATION TRATION a pH 8.5 . 7.3 7.8 Arsenic (total) 0.036 0.001 0.005 Boron (soluble) 1.7 0.2 0.2 Calcium (soluble) 60 21 38 Chloride 6 0.02 2.7 Iron (soluble) 1.11 0.02 0.11 Iror. (total) 24.0 0.04 1.2 s
| |
| Magnesium (soluble) 19 7 13 C:)
| |
| Sulfate 80 13 36 Total Alkalinity (as CACO 3) 176 52 106 Total Dissolved Solids 296 106 192 Total Hardness (as CACO3 ) 218 80 146 Total Suspended Solids 457 2 43 Note: Samples were collected from each of eight observation wells around the main plant excavation beginning January 15, 1976. The locations of the observation wells are shown on Figure 2.4-12. Installation details of a typical observation well are shown on Figure 2.4-21.
| |
| a values represent an average of 15 tests from each observation well.
| |
| 2.4-31
| |
| _ - - . - -_-_. __ __, . . ~ . _ _ . - _
| |
| | |
| Breldwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 O
| |
| e~
| |
| M
| |
| : 5. -
| |
| I 2
| |
| 8
| |
| -1 j
| |
| R.
| |
| 9.s-Ei. I. I. I. I. I. I. I-g =-
| |
| .2- R 3 : *. 2 3 3 0 :* *:- : :-
| |
| 5 .2 ; = . .
| |
| - o. . ~
| |
| . ~ ~. ~ ~
| |
| . . s. s.
| |
| E B Us4 "
| |
| * 2 : :
| |
| 2 3 C" .. "': .. ..
| |
| it:E 32 2 : : : 2 3"E 2 0
| |
| * Of i
| |
| 3C*:
| |
| "2 -2 2 333 i
| |
| 2 2 3 g3 2
| |
| 2 3 3
| |
| * 32 3
| |
| . K 22R" E R A .23 2 2 2 3R W
| |
| . . . . . . . . m. n. .
| |
| C . . . . . . . .
| |
| o u.
| |
| . ." g- . ! : : :
| |
| 3 :
| |
| g 8
| |
| .-s-
| |
| : 8. .".
| |
| J. 4 J. 4 .J J
| |
| - g5 .J . .J .J .J .J .J .J E 2.2 '
| |
| a . .J l' .'.8 ,.'.,3 3.'*L
| |
| .3 3 f.3.,
| |
| O.
| |
| ..- 8
| |
| .. ,,, 8.'.
| |
| ' . -:.,~L I..
| |
| . . . 1. E .I.
| |
| .1.g .1 1.1 .1 *-*".1".
| |
| -> i 1;.
| |
| = 22 I " .' 1
| |
| .1 8583 35 *E G324U3 GIG 3 }IG3M . U SU 3 G3 ZK2iGIf P -3'
| |
| : 'J
| |
| .t. ": 3 R. 3 2 8 ; 2 R S : : :
| |
| i gg:
| |
| R
| |
| . O E
| |
| < 23
| |
| : *. .3 .
| |
| 3 :
| |
| %
| |
| * 2 2 3. .
| |
| g og . - -
| |
| k 5 d1f . . . - - u - .
| |
| , yl , . . . . - -
| |
| gET
| |
| . *2 = . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| |
| CEl A
| |
| * a ; J A 4 4 A A A J A J J G"-
| |
| - - - - . , a p gJ 1 3 2 i 1 2 2 1 . * . J $ A J
| |
| ;3 2 4 4 A A 4 4 A A E J J J J
| |
| . =. =. =. =. =. =. =. =. =. =. =. =. =. =. =.;
| |
| 2 ~
| |
| = = = 2 = 2 2 : A :
| |
| 2.E 2 :
| |
| = ~.
| |
| sat
| |
| =<=
| |
| . '1 . o 1 e
| |
| *** ? 2~ - 3 t i
| |
| * J 3
| |
| .e d 6 a =. d' O
| |
| 2.4-32
| |
| | |
| _ _ _ . m _ ._ __
| |
| g v TA SLE 2.4-85 (Cont'd)
| |
| ELEv&TIOW OF AVESAGE PUBLIC Di3TANCE TOTAL BAWE ST POTFNTIontTERC DalLT USE Waft h LOCattnN F8ON SITa! WELL DATE DEPTM NYDe0CalAulC SURPACE IN 1979 EUPPt te (T. R. betjb (males) NO. DelLLED (feet) UNIT PENETRATED _(feet MSL/datel (apd) _M*AjAE Lakeweed Shores 32N. 9E. l.7f S.3 I 1953 700 (embdivision) Clenweed-st. Peter na aandetene 32N, 95, 1.7b S.I 2 before NA Delseite (formatter M4 unknowe) 32n. 95. 1.6e 5.3 3 before 120 b.loeite (formaties WA 1913 vekeews) 32u. 9E. l.64 S.3 4 1961 700 Cleeweed-se. Peter 'A 70,000 (eet.)
| |
| a Masse eendetene 325 78. 23.7h 8.7 2 1944 26 Clocial prift 566.S(est.3/1978 At eifere 32m. FE, 23.7h S.7 S 1963 27 CIscial Drift 564 (est)/8973
| |
| * Aquifers 12n 7E. 23.7h 8.7 6 1974 un Clocial Drift m4 Agwifere g 32N. 7E. 2 3. 7h 8.7 7 1979 27.5 Clacial Drift 573/1978 $
| |
| Agunfere g 32m. 7E. 23.7h 8.7 4 1978 26 Clacial Drift 575/1974 q v
| |
| Aquifers g y 32N. 7E. 23.7h A.7 9 1979 26 Clocial Drift 375/1979 o 100.000
| |
| , Aquifere N Reddic k O
| |
| y g 30s. 9E. 6.Se 10.3 8 1954 1888 Ctenweed-St. Peter 439/19 H . 402/1971 O sandstone 407/1975 14.500 D4 g So.eth Wilminates 33u St. II.6b S.4 1 1983 22 Clocial Drift NA Stendbyl mall me. 2 %
| |
| ) Aquilers g wee ebendoned.
| |
| 7tu, St. 13.66 5.4 3 1950 970 Clenweed se. Peter 473/1 %6; 334/1967; O esadstone 337/1970; 322/8973 l 3td. St. Bl.6e 5.4 4 Itu 970 Ctenweed-st. Peter 120/1966; 34 /1970; 143.000d d eendetene Wileinstue 33u. 9E. 25. h 6.3 2 1936 85h treason-celeeville 326/19H ; 295/IM 4; Well me. I mee sendetene 289/1978; 227/1975 eboedened.
| |
| q 35m. 9E. 36.7h 6.1 3 19M 1578 Brontou-Catesville 330/19Hg M9/1964; sandstone 295/1974; 230/1975 490.000d Sources litimese State Water Servey (at date)
| |
| {
| |
| b
| |
| *Losetiene of public meter empplies withie 10 miles are shove on Figure 2.4-14.
| |
| j Locations within each section are bened spee the systee used by the Illineie State Water Sereey litestrated below.
| |
| cmA . Data pet Available.
| |
| 4 dAverage daily use in 1900 j 8j T
| |
| teett Secatee la N
| |
| .h .h h r sec. 57. ie d
| |
| v
| |
| -r v
| |
| r s
| |
| r.
| |
| =
| |
| r lh
| |
| * q i .i g
| |
| ' .i .r
| |
| .; u ; i 4
| |
| ovesesai e4 a
| |
| $4 4
| |
| CD DI l
| |
| i ,
| |
| 4
| |
| | |
| fjRIVATE: WATER WELLS WITHIN 2 MILES OF THE FRAIDWOOD SITE CORNER, STATIC WELL WELL LEVEL TESTED TOWNSH I P- RANGE 1/16 Sec.,
| |
| NO. AND SECTION DEPTH DEPTH APPROX. CAPACITY USAGES 1/4 Sec. USER WELL TYPE , (ft) if tJ___ ELt:VATION (gal / min) (gal / day) 7.32N.*R.8E 1 23 NE. NW, SW P. Dixon Drilled 2 23 101 10 570 SW, NW, SW Crega Drilled 3 23 SE, SW, NW 102 10 570 A. Martis Drilled 91 10 575 4 23 SW, SW, SW Wisneski 5 23 Drilled 100 575 50 NE. SE, SW P. Yeno Drilled to 580 6 23 SE, SW, SE J. Tolbe rt Sandpoint 100 7 23 10 575 Listatock SW, NW, NE Franaois Sandpoint 8 26 NE, SW, SW 575 200 + Livestock 9
| |
| R. Hustc1 Drilled 121 15 575 100 26 SW, NW, NW R. Lissy Sandpoint 10 26 20 20 500 200
| |
| * NW, NE, NW Braceville-Cardner 4 Sandpoints 4 500 Waterin9 Plants Cemetery 11 26 NW, NE, hW F. Cartillo 12A Drilled 120 500 35 NE. NE, NW O. Rossio Drilled 450 128 35 198 575 100 D3 NE, NE, NW O. Rossio Drilled 12C 35 198 575 150 NE, NE. NW bJ 13 35 PM, NE. NW O.
| |
| J.
| |
| Rossio Mack Drilled 175 575 200 h pu Drilled 160 575
| |
| . 14 35 NW, NW, NE L. Cirot 150 gh 15A Unidentified 575 am 35 NW, NE, NE L. G, rot 150 g*
| |
| l 15B 11 Unidentified 580 LJ NW, NE, NE L. Carot Unidentified $80 ()
| |
| 16 35 SW, NE, NW Tweedt ()
| |
| 46 17 Unidentified 575 35 C NE, NE, SE J. Itayes Unidentified CL 13 12 SW, SE, SE 580 19 Unidentified 580 13 NW, NE, NE J. Broucek Drilled tO 20 13 90 530 250 30 NW, NW, NW Berrong Sandpoint 10 21 13 SW, SW, NW 575 250 I Beckman 3 Dug 18 8 575 22 13 NW, NW, SW H. Campbell 400 + 5.tvestock C}
| |
| Drilled 95 575 23 13 SW, NW, SW Vilt Drilled 90 575 400 + Livestock U L1 24 24 NW, NW, NW Wenger 300 2 Sandpoints 7 575 25 24 SE, SE, NE 200 26 24 Unidentified 595 SE, SE, SE C. Urban Sandpoint 12.5 27 24 SW, SW, SE 2.5 500 100 28 24 Unidentified 580 SW, SW, SE Unidentified 29 24 SW SW, SE $80 30 24 Unidentified 580 SW, SW, SE Unidentified 31 24 SW, SW, SE 580 Hibner Unidertified 580 32 24 SE, SE, SW Small Bros. Sandpoint 20 20 $b0 33 24 3E, SE. SW Tom Favero 100 Drilled 90 500 34 25 NW. NE. NE F. Yoder Drilled 142 590 50 + Livestock 35 25 NE, FE, NE Foster 50 Unidentified 580
| |
| * Usage has been calculated as number of persons using water tis:a 50 gal / day per person.
| |
| _ ~
| |
| e 9 9
| |
| | |
| 'g * }.) k .[ 7, '-
| |
| * f .) . ' ' ' *
| |
| '_,..,i+,,(
| |
| '~'E' h Y" (. ,,. * * '
| |
| L Oh ' ' ' * '
| |
| . , , , e w -
| |
| y._,~> _-? ?~
| |
| e., -
| |
| . , ' , . ,, ...q3 ,
| |
| _ + -- _ _ _ _ _ .f L . ., :
| |
| '_,._~_
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS NOISE
| |
| ({} 2.7 This section summarizes the ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the communities located within 5 miles of the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 6 2 (Braidwood Station) .
| |
| Particular attention was also directed toward obtaining acoustic noise levels where high voltage transmission lines are located close to communities. All measurements were made keeping in mind applicable guidelines; i.e. , Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) , and the Departmer.+ for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) . Noise effects in relation to adjacent occupancy are considered in Chapter 5.
| |
| 2.7.1 Approach Ambient noise measurements were made at the village limits on the side towards the direction of the station. Where a transmission line ROW passes close to a community, the ambient noise measurements were also taken at the village limits on the side towards the direction of the ROW.
| |
| Thirteen communities (Braceville, Braidwood, Carbon Hill, Central City, Coal City, Custer Park, Diamond, Eileen, Essex, Godley, Harrisonville, Lakewood Shores, and Rest Haven) lie within a 5-mile radius of the Braidwood Station. They are identified in Figure 2.7-1. Three of the thirteen communities (Braceville, On Central City, and Coal City) are located within 1 mile of a transmission line ROW.
| |
| 2.7.2 Procedures l In order to be compatible with federal and state noise standards, sound measurements were made with a Type 1 sound level meter while continuous samples of the ambient noise were being tape recorded during the day and night for periods of at least 20
| |
| : minutes. Care was taken during the recording period to ensure tnat the recorded sample would be representative of the existing ambient noise levels.
| |
| The tape recorded data were analyzed to yield both the cumulative distribution of A-weighted ambient noise levels (see Figures 2.7-2 and 2.7-3) and the Leg, which is the A-weighted Equivalent Sound Level as defined by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ('U . S . EPA 1974). Leq represents the sound energy averaged over a 24-hour period; the day-night sound level (Ldn) represents the L with a 10 dB nighttime penalty. Ldn may be calculated fromb!ytime (a 15-hour period f rom 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttine (a 9-hour period from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) Leg levels using the following relationships:
| |
| / Ln + 10
| |
| _Q 3 Ldn = 10 log l_ 15f10 10 j+ 9 10 10 j [dB]
| |
| 24 .
| |
| \ / ~
| |
| 2.7-1 ff -?h O. . .& : b$$;(l-lff 'f ll.l .h{ g, l.: ) -
| |
| ' l i'
| |
| | |
| a Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 lll Where:
| |
| Ld = leg for daytime and Ln = Leq for nighttime.
| |
| 2.7.3 Applicable Guidelines 2.7.3.1 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Maximum allowable levels of environmental noise due to the Braidwood Station are established by " State of Illinois Noise Pol-lution Control Regulation", ef fective August 9, 1973, published by the Illinois EPA. This document identifies allowable levels based on the land use category of the emitter and the receiver. Noise emitted by the Braidwood Station (land use Class C) to residential areas (land use Class A) is limited by Rule 202 (Sound Emitted to Class A Land During Daytime Hours 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and Rule 203 (Sound Emitted to Class A Land During Nightime Hours, 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). Maximum allowable octave band sound pressure levels of the more stringent Rule 203 are shown in Table 2.7-1.
| |
| This table also includes noise data measured at the village limits of the communities located within a 5-mile radius of the Braidwood Station.
| |
| 2.7.3.2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The U.S. EPA has also identified a 24-hour Leg 170 dB as the level of environmental noise that will prevent any measurable hear-ing loss over a lifetime for all areas (U.S. EPA 1974). Similarly, undue interference with activitly and annoyance will not occur if outdoor levels in residential areGs are maintained at Ld n i 55 dB. Table 2.7-2 tabulates the Ld, Ln levels at the 13 village limits towards towards the Braidwood Station side and the 3 village limits towards the transmission line R0W side.
| |
| 2.7.4.3 Department of Housing and Urban Development On July 12, 1979 HUD published " Environmental Criteria and Stand-ards, Noise Abatement and Control", 24 CFR Part 51 to encourage land use patterns for housing and other noise sensitive urban needs that will provide a suitable separation between them and major noise sources. HUD criteria state that noise levels for residen-tial developments are normally acceptable if they do not exceed a Day-Night average sound level of 65 dB. A Day-Night average sound 1 level, abbreviated as DNL and symbolized as Ldn, is the 24-hour average sound level in decibels, obtained af ter addition of 10 decibels to the sound levels in the night from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m..
| |
| Table 2.7-3 tabulates the Ldn levels at the 13 village limits towards the Braidwood Station side and the 3 village limits towards the transmission line ROW side.
| |
| lll
| |
| : 2. 7- 2
| |
| | |
| i O O O i
| |
| TABLE 2.7-3 HUD MAXIMUMS AND MEASURED Lea LEVELS Leq Levels (dBA)
| |
| COMMUNITY AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS HUD GulDELINE MEASURED LEVELS (locations) (maximum) Ldn Ld Ln Braidwood~ Station Side N
| |
| ; Braceville 65 52 49 45 ?.
| |
| ( Braidwood 65 50 45 43 Carbon Hill 65 43 43 33 @
| |
| Central City 65 53 43 47 G Coal City 65 53 44 47 l
| |
| 1 Custer Park 65 57 59 36
| |
| , Diamond 65 52 46 46
| |
| } Eileen 65 50 35 44 1
| |
| j Essex 65 37 36 28 Godley 65 51 48 44 i
| |
| ! Harrisonville 65 46 42 39 1
| |
| i Lakewood Shores 65 45 45 37 -
| |
| Rest Haven 65 46 42 39 v 1
| |
| I l
| |
| l _ . . - - . . . . ~ . - . . . - - - . . . . , , - . . . _ . - , - ~ - ~ .
| |
| _ - - ~ . _ . , . - _ - . _ _ . - _ . - . . . - .. . . . - _ , . - - - - - . . . .
| |
| | |
| TABLE 2.7-3 (continued)
| |
| HUD MAXIMUMS AND MEASURED Leq LEVELS Leq Levels (dBA)
| |
| COMMUNITY AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS HUD GUIDELINE MEASURED LEVELS (locations) (maximum) Ldn Lu Ln Transmisson ROW Side Bracev111e 65 59 53 53 f$
| |
| ,ru Central City 65 49 49 40 $
| |
| y O b Coal City 65 51 39 45 s
| |
| G
| |
| ' R$
| |
| a-0 0 0 0
| |
| | |
| -~
| |
| p .z F
| |
| V ,
| |
| i-Braidwood ER-OLS- AMENDMENT-1 f FEBRUARY 1983-BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - UNITS 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT;- OPERATING LICENSE STAGE
| |
| ! CONTENTS l CHAPTER VOLUME Introduction 1 Chapter 1.0 - Purpose of -the Proposed Facility and Associated Transmission 1 Chapter'2.0 - The Site and Environmental Interfaces 1 l
| |
| I- Appendix 2.6A - Cultural, ' Historical, Archaeological Letters ~ l Chapter 3.0f - The Station 2 Appendix 3.5A - Data Needed for Radioactive Source Term Calculations for Pressurized
| |
| . Water Reactors 2 Chapter 4.0 - Environmental Effects of Site '
| |
| l Preparation, Station Construction,.and Transmission Facilities Construction 2 l
| |
| Appendix 4.1A - Terrestrial Monitoring Program Letters 2 Appendix 4.1B - Aquatic Monitoring Program Letters 2 Appendix 4.lC - Aquatic Monitoring Program, Construc-
| |
| ! tion Phase, Executive Summaries 2 1 Appendix 4.5A - Construction Impact Control Letters 2 l
| |
| L Chapter 5.0 - Environmental Effects of Station Operation 2 i
| |
| Appendix 5.2A - Examples of Dose Calculational Methods 2 Chaptar 6.0 - Effluent and Environmental Measurements and Monitoring Programs 2 Chapter 7.0 - Environmental Effects of Accidents 2 O I
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| - (}
| |
| BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - UNITS 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE
| |
| /
| |
| CONTENTS CHAPTER VOLUME Chapter 8.0 - Economic and Social Effects of Station Construction and Operation 2 Chapter 9.0 - Alternative Energy Sources and Sites 2 Chapter 10.0 .- Station Design Alternatives 2
| |
| , Chapter 11.0 - Summary Cost-Benefit Analysis 2 Chapter 12.0 - Environmental Approvals and Consul-tation 2 Chapter 13.0 - References 2 Amendment 1 - Voluntary Revisions 2 1 a
| |
| 4 l
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENIEENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| , TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont ' d)
| |
| PAGE
| |
| ; 3.7.2 Other Waste Systems 3.7-1 l
| |
| 3.8 REPORTING OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL MOVEMENT ,
| |
| 3.8-1 1
| |
| 3.9 TFANSMISSION FACILITIES I 9-1 1
| |
| 3.9.1 Location and Description of Rights-of-Way 3.9-1 3.9.2 Line Design Parameters 3.9-2
| |
| < 3.9.3 Existing Substations Aff ected 3.9-2 3
| |
| ; 3 . 9 . 84 Radiated Electrical and Acoustical Noise 3.9-2
| |
| , 3.9.5 Induced or conducted Ground Currents 3.9-3 3.9.6 Electrostatic Field Effects 3.9-3 3.9.7 Ozone Production 3.9-4 3.9.8 Environmental Impact 3.9-5 3 3.9.9 Environmental Ccnsiderations of Trans-mission Routing 3.9-6 4
| |
| I h
| |
| !O 1
| |
| 1 l
| |
| lO 3.0-111
| |
| | |
| Cruidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 CHAPTER 3. 0 - THE STATION LIST OF TABLES NUMBER TITLE PAGE 3.2-1 Net Turbine Heat Rate 3. 2- 3 3.3-1 Average Seasonal Variations in Cooling Pond System 3.3-6 3.3-2 Variations in Plant Water Use 3. 3- 7 3.4-1 Estimated Monthly Variation in Discharge Temperature Cooling Pond Blowdown 3.4-4 3.4-2 Braidwood Station Cooling Pond 1vapora-tion Rate 3. 4- 5 3.5-1 Parameters Used in the Calculation of the Inventory of Radionuclides in the Secon-dary Coolant 3.5-20 3.5-2 Tritium Source Terms and Release Paths per Unit at the Station 3. 5-21 3.5-3 Expected Annual Average Releases of Radionuclides in Liquid EfIluents 3.5-22 3.5-4 Expected Annual Average Release of Airborn,e Radionuclides 3.5-23 3.5-5 Parameters Used in the Gale-PWR Com-puter Prograu .
| |
| 3.5-25 3.5-6 Gaseous Radwaste System Component Data 3.5-28 3.5-7 Additional Ventilation Releases f rom Plant by 1sotope 3.5-29 3.5-8 Annual Weight, volume, and Activity of Radwaste Shipped from both Units at the Station 3.5-31 1 3.6-1 Seasonal Analysis of Kankakee River Water 3. 6- 6 3.6-2 Estimates of Average Ef fluent Analysis 3.6-7 3.6-3 Estimates of Maximum Ef tluent Water Composition 3.6-8 3.7-1 Illinois Emission Standards 3. 7- 3 3.9-1 Environmental Considerations of New Transmission Line corridors 3.9-7 i P
| |
| 3.0-iv
| |
| | |
| Brcidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| ^ CIIAPTER 3.0 - TIIE STATION s_/
| |
| 3.1 EXTERNAL APPEARANCE 3.1.1 Structures The principal structures at the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1&2 (Braidwood Station) , shown in the artist's conception in the frontispiece, consist of:
| |
| : a. the turbine building (containing two steam turbine-generators and associated equipment) ;
| |
| : b. two reactor containment buildings (each housing a ,
| |
| pressurized water reactor and associated reactor coolant system);
| |
| : c. the service and solid radioactive waste storage building (foi of fice use and other related service f unctions) ;
| |
| : d. the auxiliary building (containing auxiliary systen.s and equipment) ;
| |
| i
| |
| : e. the fuel storage and handling building; and
| |
| : f. an electrical switchyard.
| |
| '/ Additional facilities include two vent stacks associated with the auxiliary building, a train washdown shed associated with the ,
| |
| fuel storage and handling building, transmission lines, a pond screenhouse, and a river screenhouse and blovdown discharge structure on the Kankakee River, and a 2537-acre cooling pcnd. l1 t
| |
| Arrangement of Structures i 3.1.2 The ar r angement of the principal structures is illustrated in the f rontis piece. Further details of the layout, including the locations of the plant perimeter and exclusion boundary, are presented in Figure 2.1-4. The switchyard is located near a ;
| |
| central group of buildings. This group includes the turbine ;
| |
| building, the auxiliary building, the fuel stor , a and handling ;
| |
| building, and the two reactor containment buildings. j The turbine building, auxiliary building, and f uel storage and l handling building form a "T" shape. The turbine building is at l one end of the "T" and the fuel storage and handling building is at the other. The auxiliary building connects these two I
| |
| buildings and is flanked by the two reactor containment buildings. The train car washdown shed extends from the end of j the fuel storage and handling building. Adjoining the turbine l building is the service and solid radioactive waste storage j
| |
| . buildi ng. l
| |
| \
| |
| 3.1-1 l 1
| |
| l l
| |
| | |
| Brcidwood ER-OLS 3.1.3 Architectural Features and Aesthetic considerations Although the facility is obviously an industrial f acility, much effort has been expended to develop a functional design that is aesthetically pleasing. For example, while the major materials of construction are concrete and steel, colored metal siding is employed as part of the architectural treatment to provide variety of texture as well as color. The siding is used on the entire turbine building and on the tendon enclosures of the reactor buildings. The structures are physically contiguous to each other; the grouping provides a balance and symmetry of design and a pleasing variety of roof and corner lines.
| |
| 3.1.4 Release Points The release points for gaseous ef fluents are through vent stacks located on the auxiliary building roof. The vent stacks, described further in Section 3.5, extend above the turbine building to about 200 feet above the plant grade. The Unit 1 vent stack is located at Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates 4,565,265 meters north and 396,950 meters east. The Unit 2 vent stack is located at UTM coordinatec 4,565,250 meters north and 396,950 meters east.
| |
| The release point for liquid effluents is the blowdown discharge structure on the west bank of the Kankakee River at an elevation of 536 feet above mean sea level at UTM coordinates 4,565,887 meters nortn and 403,568 meters east.
| |
| l O
| |
| 3.1-2 1
| |
| | |
| AMENDENT 1 asse Cis) FEBRUARY 1983 EANEAREE RIVER (utsu aussat fLs3 -
| |
| ^ e # " h BLOWDOWN 43.2 CFS ' WAKEUP 90.8 CFS
| |
| , , S FILLWAT ENEttEECT IVERFLOW
| |
| . To mAIsa Elf tt '
| |
| i
| |
| , ETAPSRATitu 51.BCf 5 I I
| |
| * ' + EsstuTIAL a g j ,
| |
| - Castius Peusl EsstuTIAL
| |
| ,Coellus Paus y g -> sinflCE STE AR WATER 10T CFM SERERATet RAIE!ALL Sr BLOWBOWh 8 3CII SttPAtt j 5Cf8 1.18 f 1 PLAuf II C9H9tB5tt NONE$$1NTIAL CILDIlut
| |
| " CB8tlut WAftt SERTICE W ATit StitFTitu TA
| |
| , 1 r r 3250Cf8 Illti$ i BatW ASTE 9-- g 1.1Cf8
| |
| . , - 1r 1r g 3r j
| |
| O titTCU if telltS TS l SLIICE 4 Cla tills tl APPROTIB Off SITE BACIW433
| |
| ='-
| |
| L 9P IISPOSAL i g,gggg E E KIIP 91LTEttB t.TECf3 Il MIN 1.tCIS 19 Elu CORBtBSATE 3r p ST0tAtt ( WATit t NATit SAND Y
| |
| .1Cf3 CARBM 1Aut k TttATutui k ST0tatt FILTERS I FILTERS N 1.1875 1.1Cf3 2 b 2
| |
| BAttWISE 8.22CFS 9P y IITitulTTiuTLY IBittuliituTLT 1r 9F I!Witt POTABLE 50Blabl0 ACTIVE 0.22Cf8 p it! A TEI NT 2 Waitt gggg, ilTitulTTERTLT TRI AT ut ui Pla uf STSTEN 351Lplus BRAIBROOD NUCLEAR GENE R ATING ST Ail 0N UNITS 1 &2 l ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE FIGURE 3.3-1 WATER USAGE FLOW DIAGRAM
| |
| | |
| . - . _ - _ _ _ ~ .._ __ _ . _ . . _ - _ _.
| |
| 1 i-Braidwood ER-OLS- AMENDENT 1
| |
| ! FEBRUARY 1983 3.4' HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTE_M 2
| |
| During the operation of the Braidwood ' Nuclear Generating 1
| |
| Station - Units -1 5 2 -(Braidwood Station) ,- the condensers and j other heat exchanse equipment require cooling water. This water 4 is taken from the cooling pond shown in Figure -3.4-1 and circulated through'the various cooling equipment; the heated
| |
| ~
| |
| l This closed-cycle i effluent is then returned to the cooling pond.
| |
| l cooling pond serves as the heat sink to dissipate most of the' j waste heat to the atmosphere. This heat is dissipated by l
| |
| evaporation and by convective, reflective, and sensible heat
| |
| ; transfer mechanisms.
| |
| q l The cooling pond has an overall area of about 3540 acres, with a j water surf ace area of 2537 acres. Approximately 301 of the total 1 pond area is occupied by islands. The maximum depth of the pond is about 15 feet, and it has an average depth of about 9 feet.
| |
| ' Figure 3. 4-1 indicates the general layout of the pond.
| |
| Earthen dikes having a width of 14 feet at the top form the j
| |
| j boundary of the pond. The top elevation of most of the dikes is 600 feet above mean sea level (MSL), 5 feet above the nornal pond pool level of 595 feet MSL: the only exception, a portion of the dikes just south of the plant, has a top elevation of 602.5 feet '
| |
| : MSL. Interior dikes have been included in the design of the Braidwood Pond in order to assure that With the maximum utilization of
| |
| () the pend cooling surface is attained. the interior dikes, the possibility of channeling or short circuiting of the warm t l water through portions of the pond .is reduced to a minimum, and
| |
| ' the cooling performance of the pond is improved. The layout of these internal dikes is shown in Figure 3.4-1. With the arrangement of the pond, no recircu]ation effects that would be detrimental to the performance of the pond are anticipated. l I channeling does occur in the Braidwood Pond due to stagnant water 4
| |
| in deep or side-arm regions, thus~ shortening the residence time of heated water in the lake. This channeling was considered in
| |
| : the lake performance analysis by using only the effective area and volume instead of total area and volume.
| |
| 4 i Significant vertical stratification of temperatures and f velocities in the pond is expected to occur only in those regions that are deeper than the 10-foot depth of discharge.
| |
| The cooling pond is supplied with makeup water from the Kankakee l
| |
| 2 River to compensate for losses due to evaporation, seepage, and l blowdown. This makeup water is withdrawn from the river at an expected rate of 90.8 cubic feet per second (cfs) by means of a i
| |
| river intake structure illustrated in Figure 3.4-2. The intake i structure operating floor is located at elevation 557 feet above
| |
| ' mean sea level (MSL), which is above the 1975 flood (flood of
| |
| ! record) elevation of 552 feet MSL. The mean annual flow and 1-() day low flow of the Kankakee River at the intake are 3640 cfs and 3.4-1 l
| |
| | |
| Braidwotd ER-OLS 487 cfe, and the corresponding water surface elevations are 538 and 534 feet MSL. h The intake structure houses threc intake pumps; two pumps of 53.5 cfs capacity are used to supply water for normal operation and a third pump of the same capacity serves as a standby and is used :
| |
| for pond filling. The velocity at the river intake structure is between 0.32 and 0.48 feet per second (fps) based on two-unit opera tion.
| |
| At the river intake structure the water flows through bar grills and vertical traveling screens to remove debris from the intake water. The debris removed from the screens is disposed of off the site by an independent contractor.
| |
| The blowdown from the cooling pond is released to the Kankakee River f rom a discharge structure illustrated in Figure 3. 4-3.
| |
| Flow control is provided on the blowdown line so that flow may be terminated when both units are shut down or are being refueled.
| |
| The location and orientation of the blowdown discharge and the river intake structures are shown in Figure 3.4-4. The orientation of the discharge is approximately perpendicular to the river shoreline. The river intake structure is approximately 2000 feet below the confluence of Horse Creek with the Kankakee River, and the discharge structure is about 500 feet below the intake structure. The discharge is returned to the river at a nuximum velocity of 4.3 fps and at an incressed temperature, which varies seasonally. Table 3.4-1 shows the mediaa monthly lll temperatures load factor.
| |
| for the blowdown with both units operating at 100%
| |
| The predicted blowdown temperature ranges frcm 490 F in January to 880 F in July.
| |
| Tss a result of the discharge of the blowdown into the flowing Kankakee Piver, a thermal plume is established downstream whose detailed temperature profile depends on river conditions and the blowdowr. characteristics. A discussion of the extent and effect of this plume is in Section 5.1; a description of the model used to estimate these parameters is in Appendix 5.1A.
| |
| Three vertical dry pit circulating water pumps per unit draw water f rom the cooling pond through a pond screen house near the pum ps (see Figure 3. 4-5) . At the pond screen house the water flows through bar grills and vertical traveling screens that remove debris from the intake water. The debris removed from the screens is disposed of off the site by an independent contractor.
| |
| The water is pumped through a 16-f oot diameter pipeline to the condensers, then through another 16-foot diameter pipeline to the discharge outfall structure and back into the pond. The Braidwood Station condenser cooling water requires a continuous flow of about 3250 cfs for the two units. This water is withdrawn f rom the cooling pond and returned there with a temperature rise of about 220 F. The total heat dissipated to the condenser cooling water is approximately 1.6 x 1010 Btu /hr for the two units. llh 3.4-2
| |
| | |
| ~. .- . . . --
| |
| 4 1 ,
| |
| I b Braidwood.ER-OLS AMENOMENT~l l
| |
| 1' FEBRUARY 1983 blowdown demineralizers. These wastes are pumped to a'10,000 gal-lon tank-for collection and sampling.
| |
| The recycle evaporator condensate demineralizer, which is. shared by both: units, is expected'to be regenerated _three times per calendar year, producing about 4,000 gallons of wastec per regeneration.
| |
| The_radwaste mixed-bed demineralizers;which are shared by both units, are regenerated as often as' required to maintain a decontam-ination f actor of 10 for soluble lons. Each radwaste mixed bed demineralizer requires regeneration every 1 to 2' weeks depending on !
| |
| ; usage, and'producen about 1800 gallons of waste per regeneration.
| |
| Expected sources are given in Table 11.1-6 of .the FSAR. 1 3.5.2.2;4 Turbine Building Floor Orains ;
| |
| ; The turbine building floor drains are shared by two units. The expected flow rates are an average of 4,200 gal / day, .with a maximum '
| |
| of 12,000 gal / day. The two turbine building floor drain tanks
| |
| ; nave a capacity of 12,000 gallons each. Turbine building floor ;
| |
| i drains, which.are normally non-radioactive, may be released from r the plant without treatment other than filtration af ter sampling, O
| |
| t If sampling indicates that the wastes are not suitable for release, '
| |
| they will be processed through.the radwaste evaporators and re-cycled. The expectea sources are given in Table 11.1-6 of the FSAR.
| |
| : 3. 5. 2. 2. 5 Turbino Building Equipment Drains The turbine building equipment drains are shcred by both units.
| |
| The expected flow rates are an average of 4,200 gal / day, with a '
| |
| maximum of 12,000 gal / day. The-two turbine building equipment drain tanks have a capacity of 12,000 gallons each.
| |
| After sampling, the turbine building equipment drains are normally t processed through one of the blowdown mixed bed demineralizer and recycled.
| |
| Expected sources are given in Table 11.1-6 of the FSAR.
| |
| 3.5.2.2.6 Auxiliary Building Equipment Orains I
| |
| The auxiliary building equipment drains collect an average 5,600 !
| |
| gal / day and a maximum of 16,000 gal / day. The expected sources are .
| |
| given in Table 11.1-6 of the FSAR. Since a31 equipment in the {
| |
| ' auxiliary building containing potentially radioactive liquid is i i i
| |
| : t i 3.5-9 [
| |
| ! ( i l
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| 't
| |
| \
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 periodically drained into this subsystem, the volume and activity on any given day varies according to the operations in orogress,
| |
| . such as replacing filter elements, draining ion exchange vessels, and flushing and cleaning tanks and. equipment.
| |
| These equipment drains are collected in two 8,000-gallon tanks, which are shared by both units. After sampling, the wastes are processed through filters and the radwaste evaporater.
| |
| 2 lO e
| |
| d 1
| |
| (
| |
| 4 l.
| |
| 3.5-9a l
| |
| l
| |
| . - . - - . - . - . - . - . - . - - - . - ~ - . - - - - - - . - - - - - , . . . - . - - - . - , - - . -
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS l 3.5.2.2.7 Auxiliary Building Floor Drains g The auxiliary building floor drains collect an average of 5,600 gol/ day and a maximum of 16,000 gal / day. The expected sources are given in Table 11.1-6 of the FSAR. These drains include pump baseplate drains in the auxiliary building, reactor coolant 1:akages, pump seal and stuffing box leakages, valve stem packing leakages, and other equipment overflows or spills. Inputs also include waste from operations such as washdown and equipment maintenance. These floor drains collect in two 8000-gallon tanks that are shared by both units. After sampling, the waste is filtered and evaporated.
| |
| 3.5.2.2.8 Laun dry Drains Laundry wastes are collected directly f rom the laundry facilities of the two units. The expected average daily flow for this cubsystem is 1400 gallons, with a maximum daily flow of 4000 gallons for both units. The expected activities are given in Trble 11.1-6 of the FSAR. The laundry wastes are collected in one 4000-gallon tank and two 2000-gallon tanks. After sampling, the waste is filtered and evaporated. Because of potentially high carryover due to the detergent, the laundry waste will be processed separately from other wastes.
| |
| 3.5.2.3 Liquid Radwaste Dischargee All liquid wastes to be released are analyzed f or gross beta, llh gamma, and tritium activity in one of the five 20,000-gallon monitor tanks after thorough mixing by recirculation. The liquid in then pumped to the 30,000-gallon release tank where a sample io again analyzed for gross beta, gamma, and tritium activity.
| |
| B sed on this analysis, a discharge rate is determined so that, when mixed with circulating water blowdoen, tne water leaving the plant has a radioactivity level less than the applicable MPC as ctated in 10 CFR 20. A key-locked switch may then be manually opened so that water can be discharged. The key for the valve lock is controlled by administrative procedures.
| |
| Ao a further backup, a radiation detector monitors the discharge line before the discharge is mixed with the cooling pond blowdown line. Upon detecting an abnormal level of radiation, a valve on the release tank line immediately ahead of the mixing point closes and an alarm signal is relayed to the control room.
| |
| Records are maintained of all radioactive wastes discharged to the environs to verify that radioactive releases conform with the requirements of 10 CFR 20 and 10 CFR 50.
| |
| Liquid radwaste releases were calculated using the PWR-GALE computer program and the parameters listed in Table 3.5-5.
| |
| Expected annual activity releases to the discharge canal are given in Table 3. 5-3. The radiological impact of these releases 10 discussed in Section 5.2.
| |
| 3.5-10
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS
| |
| (~} condensers. All radioactive noble gases entering the main N_/ condenser are assumed to be removed from the system by the SJAE.
| |
| The SJAE exhaust exhausts through the plant vent. In the event of high radioiodine activity in the SJAE exhaust, off-gases are released through both HEPA filters and a charcoal filter system affording a DF of 10 for iodine.
| |
| 3.5,3.4 Gaseous Releases !
| |
| Releases of radionuclides in gaseous effluents were calculated using the PWR-GALE computer program and the parameters listed in Table 3.5-5. Expected annual relcases of radioactive noble gases and particulates are given in Table 3.5-7. The radiological impact of these releases is discussed in Section 5. 2.
| |
| 3.5.3.5 Ventilation stacks Two ventilation stacks exhaust air emissions to the atmosphere.
| |
| Each rectangular stack has inside dimensions of 13 feet 3-3/8 inches by 5 feet 0 inches. The stacks terminate 200 feet above grade at an elevation of 800 feet above sea level.
| |
| i Each stack (one for each unit) handles the exhaust air from the following: ,
| |
| J
| |
| : a. auxiliary building veneilation system exhaust; I
| |
| () b. solid radwaste ventilation system exhaust;
| |
| : c. normal containment purge system exhaust; and
| |
| : d. miscellanecus vents collected from various cources such as battery rooms, laboratory f acilities, waste-
| |
| ; gas decay tank vents, air ejector, and i decontamination room.
| |
| I The following is a list of the approximate ventilation exhaust rates through the vent stack,
| |
| : a. auxiliary building ventilation exhaust air - 150,000 cfm;
| |
| : b. solid radwaste ventilation system - 15,000 cfm; j c. normal containment purge system exhaust air - 4 0,000 cfm; and
| |
| : d. miscellaneous vents collected from various sources such as battery rooms, laboratory f acilities, waste-gas decay tank vents, air ejector, and decontamination room - 8,14 0 cf m.
| |
| 4 O
| |
| 3.5-15
| |
| .-n -----e-. . - . _ . -, ,, --. - - - -
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 llh FEBRUARY 1983 Total air capacity exhausted through the exhaust vent is approxi-mately 214,000 c fm, which corresponds to 2,800 ft/ min face velocity.
| |
| Under all plant operating conditions, a radiation detector in the exhaust vent continuously monitors the radioactivity level of the exhaust air before its release to the atmosphere. At high radio-activity levels, this detector sounds an alarm in the main control room and alerts the operator to initiate corrective action.
| |
| Figure 3.5-3 depicts the general arrangement of the plant's roof and shows the location of the vent stacks.
| |
| 3.5.4 Solid Radwaste System 3.5.4.1 Objectives and Design Basis The Braidwood Station solid radwaste system is designed to receive, dewater, solidify with cement, seal in a 55-gallon drum, and tempo-rarily store the following wartes: demineralizer bead resins, evaporator concentrates, and scant filter cartridges. The system also receives, compacts, and temporarily stores radioactive dry wastes produced during station operaticn and maintenance. Evapora-tor concentrates and dry active waste (0AW) residue can also be solidified by polymer af ter being processed by the volune reduction i lll system. Closed-top drums approved by the U.S. Department of Trans-portation (00T) are used for packaging solidified wastes, and DOT-approveo open-top drums are used for packaging dry sclid wastes.
| |
| The expected ar.nual weight, volume, ano activity of solid radwaste shipped from the Braidwood Station appear in Table 3.5-8, which gives values both with and without the use of a volume reduction i system. Packaged radioactive solid wastes are shipped off the site and buried in accordance with applicable Nuclear Regulatory Commis-sion (NRC) and DOT reguations. The system is designed specifically for a 40-year service life, maximum reliability, minimum mainten-ance, and minimum exposure to station personnel and the general public. The expected solid radwaste system output is 5760 to 6910 drums per year if the volume reduction system is not operatiunal 1 and 900 to 940 drums if it is.
| |
| 3.5.4.2 System Description Operation of the solid radwaste system is indicated in Figure 3.5-4 of the ER and Figure 11.4-7 of the FSAR. Table 11.4-1 of the FSAR 1 lists the process equipment and storage design capacities. A more detailed system description is given in the Braidwood Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Subsections 11.4.2 and 11.4.3. The solid 1 radwaste system is comprised of the following nine components:
| |
| 3.5-16
| |
| | |
| +
| |
| w - ,
| |
| I
| |
| _ 1 1,/ ,
| |
| y
| |
| ~'
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS ' AMENDMENT l-FEBRUARY 1983 4
| |
| i.
| |
| is . . drum preparation. station,
| |
| $ -b.- decanting-station, I c. ' drumming station,-
| |
| .d. ' drum handling equipment,
| |
| : e. smear test and. label station--
| |
| ; f. dry waste compactor,
| |
| : g. Evolume reduction system, I h.- radwaste drum storage areas, and q ,
| |
| j i. control station.
| |
| i.
| |
| I
| |
| ~
| |
| Each is: discussed separately in the following subsections.
| |
| 3.5.4.2.1 Drum Preparation Station 1
| |
| j This station consists of cement unloading, storing, feeding,. weigh-1 ing, and conveying equipment used to load 55-gallon drums. A mix- ,
| |
| j ing weight is addeo to the drum to ensure uniform mixing when the v
| |
| , drum is tumbled. The unit is designed for dust-free operation, '
| |
| : with an exhaust-air filter assembly attached to the side of the t
| |
| {. fixing material storaDe. tank to capture dust generated within the
| |
| ; tank.
| |
| j 3.5.4.2.2 Decanting Station l This station consists of a stainless steel decanting tank that-i receives spent resins,'a progressive cavity decanting pump that
| |
| ] removes excess liquid, a' piston-type metering pump that transports r accurate quantities of waste from the decanting tank to the drum, l and all associated valves and instrumentation to provide remote manual operation of the unit. ' Processing equipment in contact with radioactive materials is located on the radioactive side of a thick i machined-steel shield wall. Most drives, limit switches, and in -
| |
| j strumentation are located on the low radiation side of the shield wall to minimize the dose to maintenance personnel.
| |
| 3.5.4.2.3 Drumming Station This station consists of a drum processing-unit and a heit-traced,
| |
| ; -pistontype metering pump. The pump transports accurate-Quantities
| |
| ; of waste from the concentrated waste tank to the drum. The drum i processing-unit is essentially a stainless steel box with an air-
| |
| ;. cylinder. actuated hatch in the top. The following' remotely-per-
| |
| -formed operations occur within the drum processing-unit: cap re-
| |
| , ( )- moval,- drum filling, cap reinsertion, tumbling of the drum for
| |
| ) 3.5-17 n
| |
| s
| |
| _ _ , _ . , . . _ _ .--....----.----.-.m..-....., . , , - . - - , - . , . _ , - , . - , , . , - . - ~ , - - , , . . _ . - . - - . . - , , , , . - -
| |
| | |
| T Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 drum for mixing, and washing the exterior of the drum if required.
| |
| Two separate fill nozzles are provideo, one for spent resins and one for concentrated waste.
| |
| A scale and a radiation monitor provide drum weight and activity level readouts on the control console after removal from the drum processing-unit.
| |
| 3.5.4.2.4 Orum Handling Equipment This equipment includes three remotely operated cranes with tele-vision cameras for visual surveillance, two drum transfer cars, and a filter-cartridge transfer vehicle. The cranes are used to trans-port preloaded drums to the drumming station, remove and position drums on a scale, transport and position sealed drums in either high or low-level storage, and retrieve and transport tham to trucks for of fsite disposal. The drum transfer cars transport drums between the process units and the storage area. The filter cartridge transfer vehicle transpcrts drums containing spent filter cartridges frcm the filter area to a place where the drums may be placed on the drum transfer car.
| |
| 3.5.4.2.5 Smear Test and Label Station lh This station consists of a mator-operated turntable setdown posi-tion for drums behind a small shield wall equipped with access plugs and working tools to accomplish remote lebeling, smear test-ing, and radiation monitoring of all external surfcces cf sealed drums before offsite disposal.
| |
| : 3. 5. 4. 2. 6 Dry Waste Compactor The dry waste compactor compresses paper, fabrics, plastics, and other wastes into 55-gallon drums. A large-diameter, pneumati-cally-powered ram drives the platen down into the drum. During compaction, a safety shield encloses the loading areas above the drum and protects the operator from debris that might escape. An air filtration assembly maintains control of contaminated particles during compactor operation. Radioactive dust is captured by means of a roughing filter and two HEPA filters operating in parallel.
| |
| The filtration system is interconnected to the plant radioactive vent system. The radioactivity of most of the dry waste is low enough to permit manual handling.
| |
| : 3. 5. 4. 2. 7 Volume Reduction System The major components of this system are a fluidized beo dryer, a dry waste processer, a gas-solids separator, a condenser, two 3.5-18
| |
| | |
| . ,, o:
| |
| AMENDMENT l-r ) 'Braidwood ER-OLS' FEBRUARY 1983 e
| |
| scrubbers, and an air filtration unit.- The. system 7 eliminates the: ,
| |
| water from the evaporator concentrates ~and reduces combustible material to ash. .The remaining ~ salts ~-and ash are-solidified in 1
| |
| polymer. LThe' air exhausted from~this syntem is passsed.through two HEPA 'and' one charcoal filter before: entering the auxiliary . building
| |
| ~
| |
| filtered vent-exhaust system.-
| |
| 3.5.4.2.8_.Radwaste-Drum Storage' Areas
| |
| . Shielded areas- are provided : for' the storage of low-activity and intermediate-activity waste drums and-of compacted dry-waste drums
| |
| 'according to the requirements noted in Table .11.4-1 of the FSAR.
| |
| Storage space-is designed to accommodate approximately 20% of the normal yearly' output of packaged waste (i.e., without VRS) or-1.3 1 years-of. output from the volume reduction system.- Visual surveil-lance for the : low-activity and intermediate-activity waste storage areas is provided-by the drum handling system television cameras.-
| |
| The intermediate-activity waste storage area capacity is sufficient to allow a~ decay of 60 days when used on a rotating basis.
| |
| 3.5.4.2.9 Contrcl Rocm i
| |
| This room' houses. equipment for the remote visualAmonitoring liquid / solid ano control of theJsolid radwaste building system.
| |
| interface control panel is provided for transferring waste to the J
| |
| solid radwaste system from the liquid radwaste system.
| |
| 3.5.4.3 Interconnections with Liquid Radweste Systems The' solid radwaste system is interconnected with the liquid rad-waste systems via the spent resin and concentrated waste system cnmprised of the following tanks:
| |
| : a. concentrates holding tank, and
| |
| : b. spent resin tank. ,
| |
| Tank capacities are given in Table 11.2-5 of the FSAR. 1 Spent resins are discharged to the decanting station, dewatered, and then routed to the drumming station for solidification. Con-centrates are pumped from the concentrates holding tank directly to the drumming station.
| |
| 3.5.4.4- Shipment All wastes arn shipped from the site by truck after solidification '
| |
| ible wastes). The empty drum storage 1
| |
| ~0 a(compacting for dry compressrea for shipping containers is shown on Figure 11.4-3 3.5-19
| |
| | |
| ys m) t Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 Intermediate-level wastes will be shipped with suf ficient shielding to meet the regulation governing radioactive shipments.
| |
| 3.5.5 Process and Effluent Monitoring The release points described in Subsection 3.1.4 are monitored for potentially radioactive effluents in the following manner:
| |
| : a. Continuous radiation monitoring of gase-ous effluents is g arovided for each of the two auxiliary building vent stacks.
| |
| No automatic control action occurs at high radioactivity levels, but alarms-alert operating personnel to take cor-rective action.
| |
| : b. Potential radioactive release to the circulating water blowdown line is con-tinuously monitored at the injection point from the radwaste system release i
| |
| tank into the blowdown line. If high
| |
| .. radioactivity-level setpoints are '
| |
| ) reached, the monitor autcmatically closes the release pump discharge valve. ,
| |
| A deteiled description of process and effluent radiation monitors Is presented in Section 11.5 of the Braidwood Station FSAR.
| |
| t l
| |
| 3.5-19a l
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS TABLE 3.5-1 h PARAMETERS USED IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INVENTORY OF RADIONUCLIDES IN THE SECONDARY COOLANT PARAMETER VALUE Steam flow rate per steam generator 3.79 x 10 6 lb/hr Number of condensate polishers used none Mass of water in four steam generators 3.82 x 105 lb Primary water isotope activities (see Table 3.5-1)
| |
| Carry-over factor from water to steam noble gases 1.0 O
| |
| lodines 0.01 all other isotopes 0.001 Primary to secondary leak rate design basis 1 gpm for 14 days expected normal 110 lb/ day Blowdown flow rate I
| |
| design basis 135 gpm per unit j
| |
| l expected normal 20 to 60 gpm per unit 9
| |
| 3.5-20
| |
| | |
| E Braidwood ER-OLS
| |
| 's
| |
| /
| |
| TABLE 3.5-2 TRITIUM SOURCE TERMS AND RELFJuiE PATHS PER UNIT AT THE STATION TOTAL EXPECTED RELEASE PRODUCED TO REACTOR COOLANT
| |
| -TRITIUM SOURCE (curies /yr) (curies /yr)
| |
| Ternary Fxasion~ 10,500 1050 Burnable Poison Rods .
| |
| Initial Cycle 1,520 152 Soluble Boron Initial Cycle 222 222 Equilibrium Cycle 309 309 Lithium and Deuterium Reactions 110 110 Total Initial Cycle 12,352 1540 Total Fquilibrium Cycle 10,919 1470 FARAMETERS USTO VALLE Power Level 3565 MWt 3565 MWt Load Factor 0.8 Pelense Fraction from
| |
| - C) Fuel 10%
| |
| P.elease Fraction from Burnetsle Poison Roda 10%
| |
| Burnable Poisco Rod 6160 gm Reactor Coolant Boron Concentration Initial Cycle 860 ppra Equilibrium Cycle 1200 ppm RELEASE PATHS (based on equilibrium cycle)
| |
| : 1. Liquid release via radwaste discharge 660 curies /yr per unit
| |
| : 2. Caneocs release via fuel pool
| |
| * evaporation 787
| |
| : 3. Decay in primary coolant 23 TOTAL 1470 curies /yr per unit PARAMETERS USED VALUE Evaporation rate from fuel pool and refueling canal 700,000 lb/yr per unit Primary coolant volume 466,000 lb per unit i
| |
| l 3.5-21 i
| |
| l l
| |
| . . _ , _ - . - , - _ . . - . ,-. , . _ - ._,_m . . . . . _.-, , .. . .
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT NO. 1 JANUARY 1983 0
| |
| i t
| |
| -~
| |
| b'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O u M W W W M e
| |
| ...--T"T...l.Nl
| |
| 'o 'O 'O 'O b 2 2. . 'O W u M M-OomW 4 mM uaw weawwwwa MM b 'O'O 'O 'O'O'O'O'O 'O'O 'O 'O NN . -
| |
| 'O a
| |
| emu N. o.
| |
| .M
| |
| .~.~.O.m.a..<.<..o...O N. .. ~. . n. e. .. .. N. .
| |
| . e . M.-....o.n.
| |
| na.-NN - - - N N - N a - < - - e
| |
| .--Mr.--..
| |
| n.
| |
| N
| |
| - M. M.M M M. M. . N. N. M. N.
| |
| ggu O O O COO o O O O O
| |
| . s,
| |
| .. e 8. 8 8. ; ; ; ; 8 88888."OO;;88888.O- o 8 8 8. - 8O 8.O 8. a- 8 :
| |
| .~<,u O .4 o .- 3 0 8. O O 8. -N COooo444.ocoOoN.oCom.eo.ON.O
| |
| -N. . - N. .
| |
| N.
| |
| .... . . ~ ... N ..
| |
| b 000000 O
| |
| ...R.M.
| |
| o000 00 0..0000 .. N. M. N. M.M.M.N.
| |
| 0 0 .0000000 . . .
| |
| O p .a,<s .....n . -.m-... .m......... n..
| |
| O-- .CO~eN . .M .me -oN .O*-*~ .~.- ~
| |
| ,H
| |
| , u -
| |
| 3 ~
| |
| N. . .... o o n.
| |
| N
| |
| ~....m
| |
| ----N-n
| |
| . N. . .. .
| |
| -an-n
| |
| .e.O.
| |
| . . O 4. e. O. O. N. - ~. ... .n. . O. O. M.
| |
| -n-a ---.
| |
| ~.
| |
| U D . O -
| |
| . .T.
| |
| . . ~. .....N.
| |
| - e.COoCoOO 1 1 m. a. ~. .. M.
| |
| ~ J- e C00000 O C00000 00000O O
| |
| <O ----- ------- --------
| |
| Q H -<, O . .. . e a emeN-ee a w w C. O. .W W W W m W uW
| |
| ..4m----.-M W 4 W 4 M 4 W 4 m W W W
| |
| H .. .,-e e~ee, e a z .s -
| |
| .~~..c. o. . . . o O e. N N.o..
| |
| N . -
| |
| . . . . e.. o ~.. -..a.-
| |
| N N _ ,. -
| |
| -- - .M --M
| |
| . ..W O. . N. . e.- m. a. N.. . .
| |
| .--- N e . .~.....
| |
| . .. ~. ~. T. .. .. . ~, . .. . n. . .T e. .. .. .. e. . . .,
| |
| w a = . C00000 O C00 00. 3 eOO0000000.000. . O O m a .. - ..... ..... ...- --
| |
| m . ~,<O,... .-.... .. .
| |
| = , .2
| |
| .e-.O
| |
| -M
| |
| ...CO.-
| |
| N. e. - o a. . m. O. O .e.~.
| |
| .O~
| |
| e
| |
| . . -e.-NN . .. .. .O.
| |
| n . ,e, .. O.
| |
| M. N-..,... . . .
| |
| m N
| |
| 7 N
| |
| z .. N-NN --.- . - - - .., n M - N n ~
| |
| 9 A t :D '
| |
| : a. n' I % < =
| |
| n N N 5 92 3
| |
| 8 8 8 8. 8. 3 8 8. 8 00oo0o000 88888888888888888.8888888 ooOoooooooooOOooooCoOOOo 8
| |
| o A N M
| |
| % C m o . O-a M H .= a no
| |
| - e.
| |
| O e e. OOoO e.. ... e.
| |
| O e.. . . . *~... e. e ,... .. . .. .n. <.
| |
| ~
| |
| . ..D- e. e.
| |
| O <
| |
| W .o .h .s.
| |
| C00o000 O
| |
| --------- eOO O o O O gn---- o e O O O.. O -
| |
| o O 4
| |
| ) .m p eW e a ee a w 4 g . *i en
| |
| .v , g-e- 4dr . ..e. e 4 .a .e e e Q = .w uie
| |
| .aad M. N .u 4 mum 4 mwA 1
| |
| . ~.. e.. m..ao .*~ +. . . s. e. sMt.M..W.-~. - s.- ...N. OFe ~.4~ e 4
| |
| p' . < s 3e
| |
| : z. a. ~ A. m.. . C o m. e. n. . *
| |
| > yI 4 .
| |
| l - -e..e N N-----M -dN-MM - MM-k N t
| |
| n d Z E E - @. h. . @ . .. e.
| |
| . e. .. ..
| |
| ~.
| |
| . . ~. ... .. . .m.. m. e. M.M. . .
| |
| H < e. C00000 O . M.M. . N.
| |
| Ew3 O
| |
| WWWWWW W
| |
| C090C00 WWWWWWW 0000000000000o00
| |
| ---------------- O
| |
| - .b h- @ -~.~~ * *N -M-Nee- *.e.
| |
| WWWWmWWWWWWWW WW W EON 4-e Oe M C
| |
| .w.g
| |
| > 3 M. N. ~.. .. . e OO.. . . O. 4. M. N. e. O d. e. e.. p . . e. . .. p ..e O
| |
| * 4M..4M.. .. . 4
| |
| . . medN4 - N ----N . M r. N N 4 . - - M --em -
| |
| M, 4-
| |
| ~. .. ~. ~. .. ~.
| |
| O00000
| |
| ~
| |
| O
| |
| ~. .. ... .e. e. p.
| |
| C000000
| |
| ~
| |
| ~ ~.~ ~......
| |
| oo0000000 p.
| |
| O Q E O ------
| |
| . - "w "w -w"w "4 m
| |
| * E E s.m o
| |
| O U u a.Ne . .M "a w a w e =e "m eo.m"n
| |
| .O~e.-M e Ne -aNw me-a .a w e a
| |
| .m ~a awu*0 w 0 0 0 w0 0 0 w h
| |
| p-x> -
| |
| .O.. em. . ~. O-o N.
| |
| M.N-NN N. 4.
| |
| --.-N.-
| |
| . . .N. . .O n. .~ n. e. m.. O. n. 4 0. e.~. ..O
| |
| . .~gN. O.
| |
| .O
| |
| - - - N n n e M 4 - N ~ N - U O 3 .<
| |
| M E .
| |
| g w --
| |
| V -
| |
| M.T M.M.M.M.
| |
| COOOOo M.
| |
| O Mi .. T N.N.A. . T M. M.M.M.-. N.. . M..N.N.N... . o M 00000o0 00000000000000 O x E 8
| |
| E
| |
| = a ------gg-sa* -------g--*----*------00 asaa*a* - -
| |
| N .a
| |
| .- -u e.
| |
| -m-~~N
| |
| . .8...a8.*C. O . aN.
| |
| . e.e. . 8. ...
| |
| e.e
| |
| <<- s. S. . ~a. s~s. a. .8.e..a a .2 a --NNNN-mH-~,-mN . . s .s a ". .A
| |
| .2- -NN-----O .--O.-N~. - N. . Coo..N .-
| |
| N m.N &
| |
| Q - e, C00000000 00000
| |
| -----.000000000000000000 d
| |
| -Ua. a. .
| |
| W W wwa eW W W W ww a w -----------------
| |
| e e a m a m W ww ww aa aww
| |
| ~ eOO
| |
| .=
| |
| ~.O.
| |
| Mne<~-
| |
| .O. .R.m
| |
| : e. Me O .c e..
| |
| -M
| |
| : 8. ~. N.Ceo.e
| |
| - - ~.NN--N--< e. e. . m~.N- N.O . O. N.
| |
| -.ne e~ .~e e e,. ~. e. . ~~. g.
| |
| c e .a. e. e. 3 I
| |
| ~N---N 1 o
| |
| = . E E O w C -. . U
| |
| . -e
| |
| <v e me m ~ *
| |
| * N . ~ ~ . +- - e.
| |
| _O v 4 Se O. < >
| |
| *Me.O.mee
| |
| : e. . . . . N. .D M
| |
| e.e.O -NNN m-MNem
| |
| ---aa------ MMM40 do *-
| |
| ,.g,o
| |
| < og o
| |
| 33Ng= - . ~
| |
| . ..g
| |
| <*--------u-uug3< . m.-e . - -
| |
| 9 3.5-22
| |
| | |
| Brd.dwood ER-OLS AMENDMDIT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 d
| |
| . \v d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 e ssss : : : : : *1 ws M 99 O e o o P - S O M 9**99*99
| |
| - N O- O - N to N mm
| |
| ,b O O 'O O O O O O O C N Y M M N NN M h" O '5 ON O O O O O w O O O O e O a #8 &Aa&AdAAA&Jd5 45 2
| |
| Q
| |
| * H $
| |
| A 2 O b 9 9999999 99 99 h
| |
| ~
| |
| o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o .
| |
| .ty H T C
| |
| mM D~ 2 'o 'O M E E tt g
| |
| O n
| |
| go Z l 99999999o O O O O O.O 9999 O O O O O O O m ~
| |
| N N A s e
| |
| & 35 N N o.
| |
| k 9k O O O O O C O O O 'O 'O J 4 w "h3 91;; %;; ; ; ; ; E m
| |
| : a. rue 8 v =
| |
| x O.
| |
| 0 0 0 0 O. O. O. e. O. O. O. O.
| |
| 9
| |
| . y W g O M N - en O N
| |
| * m O W Q - T tG y y Q m 5 s :
| |
| A .3
| |
| (. 5 m . - -O m O m ,
| |
| e e OhM 3
| |
| N kM Obb M M M bM M
| |
| )
| |
| Q ". ".
| |
| m
| |
| ,a d e
| |
| 5
| |
| * 9 '. 9 9 9 ".
| |
| O O e O O O -e 9
| |
| n "e 9999 O N O O - o g
| |
| EH m A.
| |
| O .*
| |
| < g N 3M 3M 3N D t
| |
| k g -
| |
| O O O e o e o O O O O O #
| |
| * H O O r- ,
| |
| 4 m
| |
| g f d & J d d & A & & a d.d 5 aays y a ** m p
| |
| . v .
| |
| - O - O g 2 2M 2M 2M 8 o O e -
| |
| 9"'
| |
| H O O *O O O O O g O o O O O O 2 dd ddd&bNdddd dd
| |
| * .u M a. $
| |
| p p e e @ W @ W e w @ W m e e d k N gg3 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O b f'i u-0 z
| |
| A925 )o .-, .N e m v N N * - @ ~ cp e o e
| |
| : e. - O - -e O . .-
| |
| - m w es M @ P @ to @ W O e O 6 N N E y{~
| |
| M N kE f,
| |
| -O W
| |
| m 8.- e aC .M N - .e N ee m - ee ce - m N e .e CL E
| |
| ~
| |
| 'O 'O 'O 'O O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O .
| |
| g 3
| |
| s ee
| |
| -M 'O -M 'O -M 'O
| |
| -M 'O -M - M
| |
| - M
| |
| - M
| |
| - M
| |
| - M - M - M - M.W --M M W QM
| |
| ** CD
| |
| * D a -
| |
| G8u AUw 2
| |
| - ~ ~ ~ * * # ~ ~M *@ *O *
| |
| @ m in 6 no @
| |
| N - O V - - O N m w & P M O e
| |
| ~ - in @
| |
| &@ g Co g #e Y Y Y 9 fy '
| |
| o a$ .
| |
| Ae n a 5Am
| |
| . e n a m a m J.-.I#a a- -.e m -
| |
| E dum 8 es i
| |
| [s / x 4 . . n. . . - - -
| |
| e e e e
| |
| .e e e e e
| |
| - m e 4: - O
| |
| : s. ,
| |
| U M M M M U N $ $ M N N E f. gad $
| |
| e e e e t, e
| |
| '' N I[
| |
| 3.5-23
| |
| | |
| TABLE 3.5-4 (Cont'd)
| |
| AIRBPkNE PARTICULATE RELEASE RATE (C1/yr)
| |
| WASTE GAS BfJILDING VE!.T1HTTON NUCLIDE SYSTEM __ EEACTOR AUXILIARY TOTAL
| |
| ~3 ~4 Mn-54 4.5x10 6.1x10-6 1.8x10 4.7x10 ~3
| |
| .Fe-59 ~3 -6 -5 1.5x10 2.1x10 6.0x10 1.6x10~3
| |
| -2 ~4 Co-58 1.5x10 2.1x10~ 6.0x10 1.6x10 -2 Co-60 ~3 ~6 ~4 7.0x10 9.5x10 2.7x10 7.3x10~3
| |
| ~4 Sr-89 3.3x10 4.7x10~ 1.3x10-5 3.4x10~
| |
| Sr-90 6.0x10 -5 8.4x10
| |
| -8 2.4x10-6 6.2x10 ~I
| |
| -6 Cs-134 4.5x10~3 6.1x10 1.8x10 ~4 4.7x10~3
| |
| ~3 ff
| |
| ~4 Cs-137 7.5x10 1.1x1C~5 3.0x10 7.Rx10 ~3 b La
| |
| * CL E
| |
| hP O ks O a CL trj
| |
| :*f I
| |
| O t*
| |
| in Notes In addition to these releases, 25 Ci/yr of argon.41 are released from the containment and 8 Ci/yr of carbon-14 are released from the waste gas processing system.
| |
| 9 O 9
| |
| | |
| . Draidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| ( h.
| |
| _, FEBRUARY 198')
| |
| TABLE 3.5-5
| |
| ; ' PARAMETERS USED IN THE GALE-PWR COMPUTER PROGRAM PARAMETER VALUE Reactor type PWR Thermal power level -(MWt) 3565.0 Mass of coolant in the primary system (10 3 lb) 534.0 Primary system letdown rato (gpm) 75.0 Letdown cation demineralizer flow (gpm) 7.5 Number of steam generators 4.0 Total steam flow (106 lb/hr) 15.0 Mass of stsim in each steam generator (10 3 lb) 9.1
| |
| () Mass of liquid in each steam generator (10 3 lb) 117.0 Total mass of secondary coolant (103 lb) 2023.0
| |
| (
| |
| Steam generator blowdown rate (10 3 lb/hr) 30.0 1 The atten generator blowdown is recycled to the condensate system af ter treatment in the blowdown
| |
| . system. Condensate demineralizers are not used.
| |
| Condensate demineralizer regeneration time (days) 0.0 Fraction of feedwater through the condensate f -
| |
| demineralizers 0.0 Annual average liquid radwaste dilution flow:
| |
| . cooling lake blowdown (103 gpm) 21.0 1 Shimbleed rate (gpd) 2160.0 Decontamination factors for the shimbleed system:
| |
| l lodine 1 x 103 Cesium 2 x 103 Others 1 x 104 Shimbleed system - Collection time (days) 0.60 Processing time (days) 2.00 0- ' Fraction discharged 0.10 3.5-25
| |
| | |
| r_ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ -. ___ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ..
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 $
| |
| TABLE 3.5-5 (Cont'd)
| |
| PARAMETER VALUE Equipment drains input (gpd) 2800,0 Frcction of primary coolant activity 0.005 Decontamination factors for equipment drains processing: 5 Iodine 1 x 104 Cesium 2 others 1 xx 106 10 Equipment drains - Collection time (days) 2.30 Processing time (days) 0.15 Fraction discharged 0.10 Clean waste input (gpd) 2800.0 1 Fraction of primary coolant activity 0.002 -
| |
| Decontamination f actors for clean waste processing:
| |
| Iodine Cesium 1 x 10f 2 x 10 6 g
| |
| others 1 x 10 2.30 Clean waste - Colle'ction time (days)
| |
| Processing time (days) 0.15 Fraction discharged 0.10 Dirty wastes input (gpd) 2800.0 1 Fraction of primary coolant activity 0.0068 Decontamination factors for dirty waste processing:
| |
| Iodine Cesium 1x10f 2 x 106 1 x 10 others i
| |
| l Dirty wastes - Collection time (days) 4.60 Processing. time (days) 0.11 Fraction discharged 0.10 Blowdown fraction processed 1.00 Decontamination factors for blowdown processing: 2 Iodine 1 x 10 $
| |
| Cesium 1 x 10 2 A Others 1 x 10 W 3.5-26
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| () TABLE 3.5-7 ADDITIONAL VENTILATION RELEASES FROM PLANT BY ISOTOPE ISOTOPE RMRASE RATE (Ci/yr) 1 Containment Purge Release (Two Units)
| |
| :-131 0.015 Kr-85 240.0 Xe-133 980.0 H-3 68 0 Auxiliary Building Ventilation Release (Two Units)
| |
| I-131 0.032 Steam Jet Air Ejector Release a (One Unit)
| |
| Kr-85 463.0 Kr-85m 111.0 .
| |
| Kr-87 63.2 Kr-88 195.0 Xe-131m 100.0 Xe-133 14,800.0 Xe-133m 163.2 Xe-135 332.0 Xe-135m 10.5 Xe-138 36.9 I-131 0.0012 H-3 132.0 aResulting from primary to secondary coolant leakage in one unit for 14 equivalent full power days with 1% failed fuel and leakage rate of 1 gal / min. This condition is not ex-O pected actually to occur, but is used for the purpose of design basis calculations.
| |
| 3.5-29
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 l FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 3.5-7 (Cont'd)
| |
| ISOTOPE RELEASE RATE (Ci/Yr)
| |
| Volume Reduction System Release (Two Units)
| |
| Gases:
| |
| ~1 Xe-131m 5.1 x 10 Xe-133m 1.2 Xe-133 2.1 x 10
| |
| ~
| |
| I-131 2.8 x 10
| |
| -3 I-132 3.7 x 10
| |
| -3 I-133 2.1 x 10 H-3 2.6 x 10 q
| |
| Particulates:
| |
| -8 Cu-51 5.3 x 10 Fe-55 7.0 x 10~
| |
| Co-58 6.0 x 10~
| |
| -8 Co-60 9.2 x 10
| |
| ~
| |
| Ni-63 7.0 x 10 Y-91 1.5 x 10~
| |
| Mo-99 3.5 x 10~
| |
| ~9 Te-99m 2.1 r 10
| |
| ~
| |
| Te-132 1.5 x 10
| |
| ~
| |
| Cs-134 1.1 x 10
| |
| ~
| |
| Cs-136 1.9 x 10
| |
| ~
| |
| Cs-137 7.4 x 10 1
| |
| O l
| |
| 3.5-30
| |
| | |
| c_ _ ._ _ _. _ _ _ - . - _ _ - _ - - - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
| |
| n '
| |
| (- -
| |
| C) t
| |
| ( ,_
| |
| ,'t .
| |
| TABLE 3.5-8 ANNUAL WEIGHT, VOLUME, AND ACTIVITY OF RADWASTE SHIPPED .
| |
| FROM BOTH UNITS AT THE STATION CONTAIRESS WEIGHT SHIPPED VOLLME SHIPPED TYPE or WASTE (1b/yr) (ft3/yr) CAftccav* sutPPING CONTAINER PER YEAR ACTIVI])
| |
| (C1/yr toad Desins* 241,900 3,100 SC Der 17C 413 10,740 SS-gallon drum Disposable Filter 131,000 1,425 SC DOT 17N 190 117 Elements 55-gallon dre g D
| |
| Evaporator O Concentrates Without vp fran 3, 3t 6. 300 from 34,350 SC Der 17C from 4,500 490.
| |
| to 3,777,900 to 30,5'20 55-gallon drum to 5,140 g DOT 17C from 294 490 0 with VB from 213,150 from 2,205 SP 0
| |
| 236,350 to 2,445 55-gstion drum to 326 W to Dry Waste Without VB 173,500 9,700 C DOT 17N 1,160 tow -%
| |
| y S5-gallon drum activity 1 g O With VB 5,075 55 SP Dor-17C 7 Imv p 55-gallon drum actiw&ty (f3 Pre and HEPA 43,000 7,300 N 100 ft3 boxes 73 low Filters plus activity other Noncompa-table and/or Noncombustible Waste
| |
| * Rey to radweste catepry:
| |
| SC - Solidified with cement before shipment.
| |
| SP - Solidified with polymer before shipment.
| |
| L - Laquid wastes none shipped.
| |
| C - Caseous wastes none shipped.
| |
| C - Compacted rags, paper, compressible weste.
| |
| N - Not compacted or solidified.
| |
| b Activity at time of druusning except as noted.
| |
| "The spent resin activity (bead resins) is calculated at the time the resin is transfered to the spent resin tank. This activity will be less if the resin is stored for significant period of time. Jd d
| |
| d Vp = Volume meduction. d Da (D
| |
| H
| |
| | |
| l msmenmT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 STEAM RADIOACTIVE GENERATOR LIQUID WASTES 8 LOWDOWN COLLECTION 8 LOWDOWN
| |
| ~
| |
| SUMPS OR CONDENSER TANKS (2) 1 1
| |
| r- - -> ' '
| |
| l l l RA0 WASTE EVAP.
| |
| l 1
| |
| u I
| |
| l MONITOR r - *' I TANK MIXED l
| |
| BED g l DEMIN.
| |
| I m SLURRY l l CONCENTRATFS g l--- TANK O
| |
| + DRUMMING _
| |
| I-- + V O 7 IJ M E e REDUC elON l SYSTEMB If
| |
| ) f~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ { MONITOR RELEASE TANK TANK l VACUUM If DEGASIFIER If COOLING TOWER CONDENSATE
| |
| ! CATCH BASIN i OR BLOWDOWN LINE STORAGE l TANK 3f PRIMARY W ATER FLOW PATTERN STORAGE BRAIBWOOB NUCLEAR CENE R AilNG ST ATION U NIT S .1 &2 NORMAL ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAG v FIGURE 3.5-1
| |
| - - - - - - ALTERNATE ,
| |
| FLOW DIAGRAM
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS O Response:
| |
| The average flow rate (gpm) through the primary coolant purifi-cation system cation demineralizers is 7.5 gpm. (The demineralizers are in service 10% of the time, during which the flow rate through them is 75 gpm.)
| |
| Request:
| |
| : 4. The average shim bleed flow (gpm) .
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| The average shim bleed flow is approximately 1.5 gpm.
| |
| 3.5A.3 SECONDARY SYSTEM Request:
| |
| : 1. The number and type of steam generators and the carryover f actor used in the applicant's evaluation for iodine and nonvolatiles.
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| There are four U-tube recirculating type steam generators with a O- carryover fraction as specified in NUREG-0017, April 1976, of 0.001 for non-volatiles and 0.01 for iodines.
| |
| Request:
| |
| : 2. The total steam flow (lb/ hr) in the secondary system.
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| The total steam flow in the secondary system is 1.51 x 107 lb/hr.
| |
| l Request:
| |
| : 3. The mass of steam in each steam generator (1b) at full power.
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| There are approximately 9000 lb ot steam in each steam generator at full power.
| |
| Request:
| |
| : 4. The mass of liquid in each steam generator (lb) at full power.
| |
| 3.5A-3
| |
| | |
| P Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 i FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| Th re are approximately 117,000 lb of liquid in each steam g;narator at full power.
| |
| Request:
| |
| : 5. The total mass of coolant in the secondary system (1b) at f ull power. For recirculating U-tube steam generators, do not include the coolant in the condenser hotwell.
| |
| Rorponse: -
| |
| Thn total mass of coolant in the secondary system is 2.02 x 106 lb at f ull power.
| |
| R quest:
| |
| : 6. The primary to secondary system leakage rate (lb/ day) used in the evaluation.
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| The primary to secondary system leakage rate is 100 lb/ day. 1 Request:
| |
| : 7. Description of the steam generator blowdown and blowdown purification systems. The average steam generator blowdown rate (1b/hr) used in the applicant's evaluation. The parameters used for steam generator blowdown rate (lb/hr) .
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| The purpose of the steam generator blowdown subsystem is to pro-vide the means for controlling the water chemistry in the steam generators. Normally, the st.eam generator blowdown is non-radioac tive , and a blowdown rate of 60 gpm (86,400 gal / day per unit) is sufficient. For purposes of conservatt=A, however, the design of the blowdown subsystem is based on a continuous 1 gpm primary to secondary leak for 14 days. During leak conditions, cecondary water becomes radioactive and will reach an isotopic
| |
| , inventory equilibrium inversely proportional to the blowdown
| |
| ! rcte. The higher the blowdown rate, the lower the radioactive content of the secondary water. With a gross radioactive leak, therefore, blowdown is increased to 135 gpm (194,400 gal / day per unit) .
| |
| Blowdown is cooled through two blowdown condensers, one per unit, th;t are crosa-tied. The cooled blowdown liquid is filtered and th3n demineralized.
| |
| O l
| |
| 3.5A-4 l _. ._ __ _
| |
| | |
| I I
| |
| l Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 1 FEBRUARY 1983 3 ,
| |
| Each unit has two prefilters so that flow can be processed l-without interruption when one filter is being replaced.
| |
| i i In the case of a 1-gpm radioactive leak, blowdown through the leaking steam generator is increased while blowdown through the
| |
| ; non-leaking unit is decreased correspondingly.
| |
| j The average steam generator blowdown rate is 30,000 lb/hr. 1 j Request: ,
| |
| : l
| |
| ; 8. The fraction of _ the steam generator feedwater processed )
| |
| through the condensate demineralizers and the decontamination i i factors (DF) used in the evaluation for the condensate ;
| |
| j demineralizer system. l i !
| |
| ) Response: )
| |
| 4 Braidwood Station does not have condensate demineralizers.
| |
| j Request:
| |
| 1 i
| |
| ! 9. Condensate demineralizars: !
| |
| j a. Average flow rete (1b/hr) ,
| |
| l
| |
| : b. Demineralizer type (deep bed or powered resin) , ,
| |
| ! i j c. Number and size ( ft 3) of demineralizers, !
| |
| j d. ' Regeneration frequency, )
| |
| l i e. Indicate whether ultrasonic resin cleaning is used and i the waste liquid volume associated with its use, and i
| |
| 1 f. Regenerant volume (gal / event) and activity.
| |
| i
| |
| ! Response:
| |
| ?
| |
| i Condensate demineralizers are not used at the Braidwood Station.
| |
| 1
| |
| ; 3.5A.4 LIQUID WASTE PROCESSING SYSTEM t
| |
| i j Request:
| |
| f 1. For each liquid waste processing system (including the shim
| |
| {
| |
| bleed, steam generator blowdown, and detergent waste processing systems) provide in tabular form the following information:
| |
| i i a. Sources, flow rates (gpd) , and expected activities l i (fraction of primary coolant activity, PCA) for all inputs to each system, 3.5A-5 i
| |
| i
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 g
| |
| : b. Holdup times associated with collection, processing and discharge of all liquid streams,
| |
| : c. Capacities of all tanks (gal) and processing equip-ment (gpd) considered in calculating holdup times,
| |
| : d. Decontamination factors for each processing step,
| |
| : e. Fraction of each processing stream expected to be discharged over the life of the station,
| |
| : f. For demineralizer regeneration provide: time between regenerations, regenerant volumes and activities, treatment of regenerants, and fraction of regenerant discharged (include parameters used in making these determinations), and
| |
| : g. Liquid source term by radionuclide in Ci/yr for nor-mal operation, including anticipated operational occurrences.
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| A. Shim Bleed Waste Stream
| |
| : a. Source: Baron recovery stream taken from letdown purification flow; i
| |
| Flow rate: Average shim bleed flow is 2160 gpd; Radioisotope activities: Calculated in on PWR-GALE (NRC, 1976).
| |
| : b. Hold-up Times and Processing Equipment (all equipment can be shared by both units)
| |
| Process and collection time of 73 hours was used for decay purposes.
| |
| : c. Capacities
| |
| : 1. Baron recycle hold-up tank 125,000 gal each
| |
| : 2. Baron recycle monitor tank 20,000 gal each
| |
| ! d. Decontamination Factors:
| |
| 3.5A-6
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS
| |
| ) c. Capacities - (all equipment is shared by both units) .
| |
| Turbine Building Equipment 12,000 gal each Drain Tanks (2)
| |
| Turbine Building Equipment 216,000 gpd Drain Filter (1)
| |
| Blowdown Demineralizers (4) 259,200 gpd each
| |
| : d. Decontamination Factors:
| |
| Element Filters Demineralizers I 1 1 x 102 Cs, Rb 1 1 x 10s Others 1 1 x 102
| |
| : e. Fraction of processed waste stream ascumed released to environment after processing - 10%.
| |
| : f. Not applicable.
| |
| : g. See Table 3.5-3.
| |
| D. Turbine Building Floor _ Drains Waste _ Stream O a. Sources:
| |
| turbine building floor drain sumps, release tank, essential service water sumps, condensate pit sumps, and tendon tunnel sumps.
| |
| Flow Rate: 6dOO gpd (maximum) , 2100 gpd (annual average) per unit.
| |
| Radioisotope activities: Calculated in PWR-GALE (NRC 1976).
| |
| I
| |
| : b. Hold-up Times and Processing Equipment ]
| |
| (all equipment is shared by both units) .
| |
| Turbine Building Floor Drain 1.3 hours (minimum)
| |
| Tank Turbine Building Floor Drain negligible Filter l
| |
| I 3.5A-9
| |
| ,,w , ,.,,e,,
| |
| - ,- ,, + - , , - . , . - , . , , . , - - _ , , - , _ , , - , _ , , - , , - . , - . - . , , , . , , ,
| |
| | |
| i Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| , FEBRUARY 1983 j
| |
| : c. Capacities (all equipment is shared by both units) .
| |
| lll Turbine Building' Fioor Drain 12,000 gal each Tanks (2)
| |
| Turbine Building Floor Drain 216,000 gpd Filter (1)
| |
| : d. Decontamination Factors:
| |
| Element Filters Demineralizers I 1 1 x 102 Cs, Rb i 1 x 101 Others 1 1x 102
| |
| : e. Fraction of processed waste stream assumed released to environment after processing - 10%.
| |
| : f. Not applicable.
| |
| : g. See Table 3.5-3.
| |
| E. Chemical Drains Waste Stream
| |
| : a. Sources: fuel handling building decontamination sump, llg sample system (secondary) , sample system (primary),
| |
| laboratory drains, drumming station drum processing unit drain, boron recycle system, and primary water storage -
| |
| tank.
| |
| Flow rates: 3000 gpd (maximum) , 1050 gpd (annual average) per unit.
| |
| Radioisotope activities: 8/1000 PCA 1
| |
| : b. Hold-up Times and Processing Equipment (all equipment shared by both units)
| |
| Chemical Drain Tank 1 hour i Chemical Drain Filter negligible Radwaste Evaporators 1.5 hours Radwaste Demineralizers negligible Radwaste Monitor Tanks 1 hour (minimum)
| |
| : c. Capacities (all equipment is shared by both units) i O
| |
| 3.SA-10
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS Chemical Drain Tank (1) 6,000 gal
| |
| ( ))
| |
| chemical Drain Filter (1) 216,000 gpd Radwaste Evaporators (3) 43,200 gpd each Radwaste Demineralizers (3) 64,800 gpd each Radwaste Monitor Tanks (2) 20,000 gal each (Radwaste Evaporators, Demineralizers, and Monitor Tanks are also used to process other waste streams.)
| |
| : d. Decontamination Factors:
| |
| Element Filters Demineralizers Evaporators i
| |
| 1 1 x 10a 1 x 103 I
| |
| 1 x los 1 x 10*
| |
| Cs 1 Rb 1 1 x 10 1 x 104 l Others 1 1 x 10 1' x 10*
| |
| Fraction of process waste stream assumed released to 1
| |
| e.
| |
| environment after processing - 10%.
| |
| : f. Not applicable. ,
| |
| See Table 3.5-3.
| |
| {} F.
| |
| g.
| |
| Laundry Wastes Waste Stream
| |
| : a. Sources: laundry washing machine drains and personal ,
| |
| shower drains.
| |
| Flow rate: 2000 gpd (maximum) , 700 gpd (annual average) per unit.
| |
| Radioisotope activities: Calculated in PWR-GALE (NRC 1976). ;
| |
| : b. Hold-up Times and Processing Equipment (all equipment shared by both units) .
| |
| Laundry Drain Tank 1.1 hours (minimum)
| |
| Laundry Drain Filter negligible Permeate Storage Tank 1. 3 hours (minimum)
| |
| Padwaste Evaporator 1.5 hours Radwaste Demineralizers negligible Radwaste Monitor Tanks 1 hour (m'inimum) 3.5A-11
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| : c. Capacities (all equipment is shared by both units) ggg Laundry Drain Tank (1) 4,000 gal Laundry Drain Storage Tanks (2) 2,000 gal, each Laundry Drain Filter (1) 216,000 gpd Radwaste Evaporators (3) 43,200 gpd each Radwaste Demineralizers (3) 64,800 gpd each 20,000 gal each Radwaste Monitor Tanks (2)
| |
| (Radwaste Evaporators, Demineralizers, and Monitor Tanks are also used to process other waste streams.)
| |
| : d. Not applicable.
| |
| : c. Fraction of process waste stream assumed discharged to the environment after processing - 100%.
| |
| : f. Not applicable,
| |
| : g. See Table 3.5-3.
| |
| Go Auxiliary Building Equipment Drains Waste Stream
| |
| : a. Sources: low conductivity regeneration waste drains, reactor coolant drains, and auxiliary building equipment drain collection sumps.
| |
| Flow rate: 8000 gpd (maximum) , 2800 gpd (annual average) per unit.
| |
| Radioisotope Activities: 5/1000 PCA q
| |
| : b. Hold-up Times and Processing Equipment (all equipment is shared by both units) .
| |
| Auxiliary Building Equipment 2. 2 hours (minimum)
| |
| Drain Tank Auxiliary Building Equipment negligible Drain Filter Radwaste Evaporators 1.5 hours Radwaste Demineralizers negligible Radwaste Monitor Tanks 1 hour (minimum)
| |
| : c. Capacities (all equipment is shared by both units) .
| |
| I 3.SA-12 l
| |
| l l
| |
| | |
| ~- '--
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| (')
| |
| (> Auxiliary Building Equipment 8,000 gal each Drain Tanks (2)
| |
| Auxiliary Building Equipment 216,000 gpd Drain Filter (1)
| |
| Radwaste Evaporators (3) 43,200 gpd each Radwaste Demineralizers (3) 64,800 gpd each Radweste Monitor Tanks (2) _ 20,000 gal each (Radwaste Evaporators, Demineralizers, and Monitor. Tanks
| |
| - are also used to process other waste streams.)
| |
| : d. Decontamination Factors:
| |
| Element Filters Demineralizers _ Evaporators I 1 1 x 102 1 x 103 Cs 1 1 x 108 1 x 10 *
| |
| , Rb 1 1 x 108 1 x 10*
| |
| Others 1 1 x 10 1 x 10*
| |
| ; . e. Fraction of process waste stream assumed discharged to the environment after processing - 10%.
| |
| () f. Not applicable. .
| |
| : g. See Table 3.5-3.
| |
| H. Auxiliary Building Floor Drains Waste Stream 4
| |
| : a. Sources: auxiliary building sumps, fuel handling building sumps, reactor cavity sumps, and containment floor drain sumps.
| |
| Flow rate: 8000 gpd (maximum) , 2800 gpd (annual average)
| |
| Radioisotope activities: 2/1000 PCA 1
| |
| : b. Hold-up Times and Processing Equipment (all equipment can be shared by both units).
| |
| Auxiliary Building Floor 2.2 hours (minimum)
| |
| Drain Tank
| |
| ~
| |
| Auxiliary Building Floor negligible Drain Filter Radwaste Evaporators 1. 5 hours Radwaste Demineralizers negligible Radwaste Monitor Tanks 1 hour (minimum) 3.5A-13
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENEMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| : c. Capacities (all equipment is shared by both units).
| |
| Auxiliary Building Floor 8,000 gal each Drain Tanks (2)
| |
| Auxiliary Building Floor 216,000 gpd Drain Filter (1)
| |
| Radwaste Evaporators (3) 43,200 gpd each Radwaste Demineralizers (3) 64,800 gpd each Radwaste Monitor Tanks (2) 20,000 gal each
| |
| : d. Decontamination Factors:
| |
| Element Filters Demineralizers Evaporators I 1 1 x 102 1 x 103 Cs 1 1 x 10 1 x 10 Rb 1 1 x 101 1 x 10*
| |
| Others 1 1 x 102 1 x 10*
| |
| : e. Fraction of process waste stream assumed discharged to environment after processing - 10%.
| |
| : f. Not applicable.
| |
| dIl
| |
| ~
| |
| : g. See Table 3.5-3.
| |
| I. Regeneration Wartes Waste Stream
| |
| : a. Sources: drueming station decanting tank overflow, spent resin sluicing Crain, recycle evaporator condensate demineralizer, radwaste mixed bed demineralizer, and blowdown mixed bed demineralizer.
| |
| Flow rate: 5000 gpd (maximum) ; 1750 gpd (annual average) per unit. .
| |
| Radioisotope activities: 6/1000 PCA 1
| |
| : b. Hold-up Times and Processing Equipment I (all equipment shared by both units) .
| |
| Regeneration Waste Drain Tank 1.7 hours (minimum) ,
| |
| l Regeneration Waste Drain Filter negligible Radwaste Evaporators 1.5 hours Radwaste Demineralizers negligible
| |
| ! Radwaste Monitor Tank 1 hour (minimum) )g gg 3.SA-14
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENEMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 es reduce airborne concentration of this isotope to approximately
| |
| (_) 1 x 10-10 C1/cm3 The containment internal recirculation system )
| |
| will operate approximately 18 hours before purging. The ;
| |
| containment is purged at a rate of 40,000 cfm before the i admission of workers for refueling, maintenance, or repair of ,
| |
| equipment. The design purge frequency is 10 purges / year per #
| |
| unit. The expected purge frequency is approximately 6 i purges / year per unit. The containment is purged continuously, however, at a rate of 3000 cfm.
| |
| 3.5A.7 SOLID WASTE PROCESSING SYSTEMS Request:
| |
| J
| |
| ) 1. In tabular form, provide the following information concerning all inputs to the solid waste processing system: source, volume (f t3/yr per reactor) , and activity (Ci/yr per reactor) og, principal radionuclides, along with bases for valves used.
| |
| ! Response:
| |
| 1
| |
| ? Information concerning inputs to the solid waste processing I system are given in Table 3.5-8.
| |
| i Request:
| |
| j l 2. Provide information on onsite storage provisions (location j
| |
| () and capacity) and expected onsite storage times for all solid wastes prior to shipment.
| |
| i Response:
| |
| 1
| |
| . Solid wastes will be stored in the Radwaste Building before i shipment (see B/B FSAR Figure 11.4-3) . Storage space is designed to accommodate approximately 255 of the normal yearly output of
| |
| ; packaged waste. This amount was selected to allow for some decay a of drummed material, startups, trucking strikes, unavailability ,
| |
| l of burial sites, and other contingencies. Information on the solid waste storage area is given in the following list. For other information ref er to Section 11.4 of the B/B FSAR.
| |
| Number of Design Capacity Starage Area Storage Areas Per Storage _ Area Low Level 1' 570 drums .
| |
| Intermedicte level 1 640 drums Dry compacted waste 1 70 drums 1 .
| |
| i Dry uncompacted waste 1 90 ft3 ;
| |
| i Empty drum 2 100 drums (total) i
| |
| : 3. 5A-19 i
| |
| - ., m,__ , . . - _ - - - , _ - . . , , r,.,. _ , .,.. _ . _ . .,._,y, . , , - - _ ,
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 Request:
| |
| : 3. Provide piping and instrumentation diagrams (P& ids) for the solid radwaste system.
| |
| | |
| ===Response===
| |
| The P&ID drawings of the solid radwaste system are shown on 8/B FSAR Figures 11.4-5 and 11.4-5. 1 O
| |
| t 3.5A-20 0
| |
| | |
| . __. __ _. _ . ___ _ ~_ _ __ _ _
| |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS The formation of monochloramines (Equation 3.6-3) takes precedence over zhat of di- and trichloramines and is generally 4
| |
| instantaneous. The chloramines formed are present as
| |
| , monochloramines due to the small ratio of HOCl to NHa. The chlorine in chloramines still retains about half of its oxidizing i'
| |
| potential and is still effective as a bactericide. The reaction rate of chloramines, however, is lower than that of HOCl.
| |
| The small concentrations of chloramines formed and the residual
| |
| ! chlorine present are not expected to persist in the water for j
| |
| three reasons. First, the circulating water contains bacteria that assimilate the residual chlorine and chloramines of the i nonessential service water. The residual chlorine and
| |
| ] chloramines of the essential service water are assimilated when combined with the blowdown from the essential cooling pond, which will still contain bacteria. Second, part of the volatile
| |
| ; chloramines are lost due to evaporation. Third, while retaining
| |
| ! their oxidizing potential, HOC 1 and chloramines react with and are destroyed by reducing agents like S=, Fe++, and Mn++, as shown in the following equations:
| |
| H,S +,4HOCl - HaSO,+ 4 hcl (3. 6-6) i 2Fe (HCO 3 ) , + HOCl + hcl + Ca (HCO 3) ,-*2Fe (OH) 3 + CaC1 2 + 6CO, +H0 (3.6-7)
| |
| MnSO, + HOCl + hcl + 4NaOB-a-MnO, + 2 Nacl + Na SO, + 3HzO j O ( 3. 6- 8)
| |
| Since there is no accurate way to predict the chlorine demand of the pond, the exact quantity of NaOCl used 10 impossible to i predict. The feed rate is carefully monitored. The service 1
| |
| water, which may have a small residual chlorine content af ter chlorination, is returned to the cooling pond. Since the
| |
| : condenser cooling water is chlorinated after the blowdown take-
| |
| ! off point, chlorine concentration at the point of blowdown
| |
| : discharge is negligible.
| |
| i j 3.6.2 Makeup water Treatment System j Surface water from the cooling pond is used to supply the makeup i water required for the steam cycle. As shown in Figure 3. 3-1, j the water is passed through a chlorine retention tank,
| |
| ; clarifiers, and a clear well. From there the water passes j through threc parallel sand filters. Each filter operates at 3.0 j gpm/ft2 during normal operation and a maximum of 4.5 gpm/fta when j one filter is out of service. After each use, each filter is j backwashed for 5 to 10 minutes, using 1000 gpm of filtered water ,
| |
| j for each filter. The filtered water is stored in a 150,000 j gallon tank.
| |
| ; Three filtered-water transfer pumps (one a spare) supply water to i the domineralizer trains for treatment. There are two identical
| |
| ; O v
| |
| demineralizer trains, each capable of producing a net daily average of 150 gpm. Each train consists of, in order, a primary, l
| |
| 3.6-3
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 '
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 llh strong-acid cation unit, a secondary, strong-acid cation unit, a cock-base anion unit, a strong-base anion unit, and a mixed bed unit. After treatment, the water goes to the condensate storage tank or primary storage tank.
| |
| : 3. 6. 2.1 Regeneration Wastes After a quantity of water has been processed through the demineral-izor train, the ion exchange resin is exhausted and needs chemical regene rati on. Regeneration of the exhausted resins may take place once each day. During regeneration, which lasts about 4 hours, the only chemicals added are sulfuric acid (H SO 2 4) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Each regeneration require 2240 pounds of 93%
| |
| H2 S0; and 792 pounds of 100% NaOH for regeneration and neutral-ization. The 70,095 gallons of waste produced during each regener-ction are routed into the circulating water flow.
| |
| 3.6.2.2 Filter Backwash Effluent The makeup filter subsystem consists of three parallel sand filters and carbon filters. Each filter is backwashed once each day with water from the filtered water storage tank. The backwash water contains dissolved solids and suspended solids that are collected during the filtering process. The sand filters are backwashed each day for a 10-minute period at a rate of 1.9 cubic feet per second g
| |
| (cfs), and the carbon filters are backwashed each day for a 10-min-uto period at a rate of 0.76 cfs. The discharge from this back-eashing operation is routed to the waste treatment building.
| |
| 3.6.3 Waste Treatment Treatment consists of an oil separater, an agitated equalization basin, a-Quadricell separator, and filtration, after which the clean water effluent is routed to the circulating water system.
| |
| l The oil separator is equipped with skimmers to remove oil. The skimmed oil flows to a waste oil nolding tank. The waste oil is disposed of, as necessary, by a licensed contractor in an approved 1 I manner. (
| |
| Sludge from the Quadricell is pumped by sludge transfer pumps to sludge drying beds. Underflow from the beds is pumped by underflow pumps to the equalization tank. The dried sludge is scraped off and hauled away by a licensed contractor for disposal in a certi-fled landfill site.
| |
| 3.6.4 Potable Water System The volume of water uced for potable and sanitary purposes is small (about 15,000 gallons per day [gpd]) in comparison with other plant ggg 3.6-4
| |
| | |
| Braidwood'ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| . ( )~ FEBRUARY 1983 ,
| |
| uses. Water-is taken from the filtered. water storage tank. ~The water is chlorinated with hypochlorite, which.is. fed at a rate -
| |
| proportional'to the flow rate. .The chlorinated water is then stored for potable and sanitary use.-
| |
| All' sanitary wastes are treated in a sewage treatment system of
| |
| -approved design (for.further details see Section 3.7). The dis- i charge from the sewage treatment plant is . continuously chlorinated, as indicated in Section 3.7, and is discharged with the cooling '
| |
| pond blowdown. The chlorine dosage is-usually 3 to 10 mg/ liter.
| |
| 1 This dose results in a free' residual chlorine concentration of about 0.5Lppm. .After mixing with the cooling pond blowdown, the 5 chlorine concentration is negligible. )
| |
| 3.6.5 Ra.dwaste System i
| |
| The discharge from the radwaste system is high-purity distilled i water. The radwaste plant receives and decontaminates wastes that ;
| |
| result from the operation of the-nuclear reactors. -After the nec- '
| |
| essary decontamination, the liquid ef fluents 'are batch discharged ;
| |
| to.the cooling pond blowdown. Section 3.5 discusses the radwaste system in detail. t
| |
| () Table 3.6-2 shows the estimated effluent analysis, and Table 3.6-3 the average' analysis, of the final discharge, which in both' cases f
| |
| meets all Statelaf Illinois effluent standards. !
| |
| I t
| |
| r l
| |
| l f
| |
| I I
| |
| 3.6-5 r r
| |
| i
| |
| --,-...-......--.-.-,.,...-..--..,,...-,,----..,-,-.....--..~.----.-_-.---,,,...-__..~-,_---,,,...-.---J
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 3.6-1 SEASONAL ANALYSIS OF KANKAKEE RIVER WATER (All Values in mg/ liter)
| |
| WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL AVERAGE MAXIMUM Calcium 71.9 78.7 81.8 77.8 77.6 118 Magnesium 23.9 21.3 24.8 24.0 23.5 31.0 Sodium 16.4 7.2 13.8 14.7 13.0 25.6 Alkalinity (As CACO 3) 178 140 159 202 170 235 Sulfate 62.4 60.4 45.7 93.9 65.6 164 Chloridea 23.0 22.5 21.0 21.5 22.0 25 Nitrate 1.7 4.5 2. 2 0.9 2.3 6.2 Silica 2.3 3.1 4.2 3.2 3.2 5.3 $ lll Filterable Residue 381 361 397 All 388 489 Note: pH average 8.2, range 7.0 to 9.0 Samples taken at Location 3, Intake Area Sources: Illinois Natural History Survey 1977-1979, 1981 a Commonwealth Edison 1977-1978 3.6-6 9
| |
| | |
| } '/-A ;Braidwood'ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| , d FEBRUARY 1983 3.9 TRANSMISSION FACILITIES h 13.9.1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTIO OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
| |
| \ ,.
| |
| . Figure - 3.9-l'shows the transmission connections .for the Braidwood
| |
| ~
| |
| ! Nuclear Station. _'These consist of-existing double circuit.345 kV
| |
| ! lines. connecting to the LaSalle County Generating Station and the
| |
| ! East Frankfort Transmission Substation and of a double circuit 345 j kV line constructed.on new.right-of-way (ROW) to an existing linc on the property of.the Crete Transmission Substation. One. circuit
| |
| ; of- the double circuilt 345 kV:line will connect to the Bloom Trans-3 mission Substation with an intermediate connection at the Davis i Creek Substation. The other circuitJwill connect to the Burnham
| |
| ; . Transmission Substation. No connection will be made to the Crete Transmission Substation.
| |
| ; Figure 3.9-2 shows the~ detailed route of the new line from the _
| |
| . Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 and 2 (Braidwood j Station) to the existing Crete 1 Transmission Substation. This route j traverses approximately 55 miles and crosses nearly flat agricul-
| |
| : tural land of' low relief. A 330 foot ROW that includes space for a l double' circuit 345 kV line and a future 765-kV line comprises the
| |
| [
| |
| i first 7.3 miles. The next 15.6 miles' is, in general, also 330 feet wide and accommodates a four circuit 345/138 kV transmission line and, for the most part, a future 765 kV line. 1
| |
| : In Section 36 of Rockville Township in Kankakee County, the four-
| |
| ! circuit construction terminates at the Davis Creek Transmission Substation. The double circuit 345 kV line continues north for 7.4
| |
| - miles on a 315 foot wide ROW that can also accomodate a future 765 kV line. The next 17 miles between Wilton and Washington Townships i involves a 180-foot widening of an existing 200-foot R0W. This i 380-foot R0W will have a double circuit 345 kV line parallel to and l with structures opposite those of an existing 765 kV line. From Washington Township 7.75 miles northward to the Crete Substation, a
| |
| !- new 235-foot ROW will accommodate a double circuit 345 kV line and
| |
| ! a future four circuit 138/345 kV line (see Figure 3.9-2) . Struc-
| |
| ! ture types for the 55 mile transmission line will be similar throughout, single shaft structures for tangent and light angles ,
| |
| i (up to 130) and lattice steel towers for angles over 130 The
| |
| : single shaft structures will normally not exceed 6 feet in diameter at the ground;line. All tangent structures will either be direct i- -embedded in soil with granular or concrete backfill or will have
| |
| ' poured concrete foundations. The tower foundations will normally
| |
| . be 3 foot diameter poured concrete belled caissons on each of the four legs of the towers.
| |
| 3.9-1 l
| |
| -.__.__.,..,,,__.-_..--__._.u.--....,..--...__-_____,_.___.
| |
| | |
| l Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDHENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 llh I
| |
| All sections of the line will average no more than six (6) struc-turss per mile. Figure 3.9-2 shows the route and structure pro-files for this line.
| |
| Th3 route crosses through nearly 48 miles of cleared farmland, 3.38 miles (129 acres) of open woodland and hedge rows, and 2.75 miles (105 acres) of riparian woodland. The lines cross the Kankakee 1 Rivar approximately 7 miles northwest of Kankakee, Illinois.
| |
| Eleven (11) creeks and eighteen (18) intermittent streams are also crossed. Transportation route crossings include the Norfolk &
| |
| Wsstern; Illinois Central Gulf; Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul &
| |
| Pccific; and Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroads, one interstate highway, two U.S. highways, and four state roads (see Table 3.9-1).
| |
| 3.9.2 LINE DESIGN PARAMETERS The transmission line will be constructed to meet or exceed all requirements of'the Illinois Commerce Commission General Order 160, which is identical to the National Electric Safety Cor.e for the construction of transmission lines. Electrically, the line is designed to minimize adverse effects to the general public. The insulation used for this line will be equal to or greater than that which is common practice in the electrical utility industry. The conductor diameters will be in the range that results in low corona, audible noise, and electrical noise. Wires to be used for lll this line are one 2156 MCM ACSR (84/19) conductor per phase and one 7#8 alumoweld static wire per circuit. Each conductor is rated 2300 amperes (summer normal) and 2900 amperes (summer emergency).
| |
| 3.9.3 EXISTING SUBSTATIONS AFFECTED The transmission substations affected are the Bloom Transmission Substation located east of Chicago Heights, Illinois, in Section 27 of Bloom Township in Cook County, Illinois, and Burnham Transmis-sion Substation located in Burnham, Illinois, in Section 6 of 1 Thornton Township in Cook County, Illinois. Both substations con-tain 345 kV to 138 kV transformers and no new 345 kV terminal facilities will be added to accommodate the Braidwood transmission lines.
| |
| 3.9.4 RADIATED ELECTRICAL AND ACOUSTICAL NOISE The diameter of the conductors used will be in the range that re-sults in low corona, audible noise, and electric noise. Although engineering has not been completed on the transmission line, it is anticipated that the same engineering criteria used on past dcsigns, resulting in few problems, will be duplicated or improved for this transmission line.
| |
| 3.9-2 O
| |
| | |
| - . . . - - = --- -. . , ~ . -=.
| |
| I L ; Braidwood ER-OLS -- AMENDMENT 1 i'
| |
| ,. L c FEBRUARY 1983 L ?
| |
| ;; 3.9.5 INDUCED OR CONDUCTED GROUND CURRENTS
| |
| : Induced or conducted ground : currents .can become a significant f ac-tor Lin urban areas where extensive networks of pipes and cables j have been placed underground. .The magnitudes of currents induced i
| |
| , into-such underground networks are. dependent-upon the current in j the overhead transmission lines, the distance above the ground, the ;
| |
| l soil-~ characteristics, and the extent of parallelism between the
| |
| ' transmission-lines _and the underground' equipment. Also, during i high_ ground fault conditions, present designs are such that the ;
| |
| entire. fault current does not~ pass through the ground. High speed l relays at the substations operate to render such situations highly l transient,-reducing the potential corrosion due.to the " battery ;
| |
| t effect". (The soil can serve as as an electrolyte between the l transmission ground'and the underground equipment of other sys-tems. As with conventional' batteries, corrosion of:these "ter- :
| |
| minals" could. result.). A complete analysis of these problems can- ,
| |
| not be made until the load currents have been determined and load i flow studies have'been completed.
| |
| 3.9.6 ELECTROSTATIC FIELD' EFFECTS 1
| |
| . Electrostatic fields are present at any voltage level.- The field !
| |
| strength is dependent upon voltage, height of conduct, and distance i from the centerline of-the support structure. Past installations i of.138 kV and 345 kV lines have proouced few if any complaints.
| |
| Introduction of 765 kV lines, however, has caused review of these l
| |
| 4
| |
| -effects _and explanations to the public of the electrostatic fields t under these lines. The intensity of the field can be calculated i before installation ano actually checked by measurement after in- [
| |
| sta11ation. Past experience has shown calculated values to have !
| |
| been conservative. Based on these conservative' calculated values, !
| |
| the 345 kV lines, either independently or in conjunction with 138 !
| |
| kV lines, are not expected to cause significant electrostatic ef- t fects. Where the 345 kV lines are to be placed parallel to an ;
| |
| 4 existing 765.kV lines, calculated values show that the field in-tensity is-increased slightly in some areas and actually decreases
| |
| .in other areas. In either case the incremental difference is so slight as_to be hardly measurable. It is planned to measure the f field strength before installation and again after installation of !
| |
| the 345 kV lines for comparative analysis. As in the past, CECO. l
| |
| , will work cooperatively with landowners to mitigate or correct any I 2 -adverse effects caused by the electrostatic field. Corrective
| |
| ; measures will be in accordance with the following paragraphs. i 1 I I . Fences and other fixed metallic objects in and along transmission !
| |
| j line rights-of-way are grounded when CECO. design calculations !
| |
| 3.9-3 t ;
| |
| Y t i f 1
| |
| I
| |
| ~_ - . _ _ . , . . - _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ - - . _ _ _ - . _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ . - - _ . - _ _ . , , . _ , - . . . . _ , _ _ , . . , _ , _ .
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 indicate that the eletrostatically induced drain current would Oxceed the minimum level of perception (approximately 1 milli-cmpere) of a person touching the fence or metallic object.
| |
| Induced voltages on electric fences are drained by the installation of drain coils at appropriate intervals. The grounding technique for non-electric fences on wood posts is to install steel posts at 1 cppropriate intervals and connect the fence to them. Fences on steel fence posts do not need additional grounding.
| |
| With respect to mobile equipment, the ground clearance of the 345 kV lines will be such that under all conditions the current due to electrostatic ef fects will be less than 5 mil 11 amperes, rms, if the largest anticipated trucks, vehicles or equipment operated under the lines were short circuited to ground.
| |
| 3.9.7 OZONE PRODUCTION The generation of gaseous effluents as a result of corona activity on extra high voltage (EHV) transmission lines has been raised as an environmental issue. As a result, CECO. engaged the services of an outside consultant to determine the validity and magnitude of the ozone effect.
| |
| g Since the ozone has only recently been recognized as a potential pollutant, some background information on the substance may be helpful. Ozone (03 ) is 50% denser than oxygen (0 2 ) and is a very reactive compound. It is formed naturally in three ways:
| |
| High in the atmosphere, oxygen reacts with ultraviolet sunlight to form ozone, which circulates to lower altitudes as a result of weather. Sunlight reacting with airborne pollutants can also create ozone. Finally, lightning and other high voltage discharges cause oxygen to disassociate and recombine to form ozone. Gener-ally, the ambient ozone level is proportional to the strength of the sunlight, increasing during the day and decreasing during the night. North winds, however, also bring in ozone from the Arctic.
| |
| It is possible for high voltage transmission lines to produce ozone if they have high voltage discharges (corona). The U.S. and Illinois Environmental Protection Agencies have set an air quality standard of 8 parts per 100 million as the maximum 1-hour concen-tration, which is not to be exceeded more than once per year.
| |
| A field test program has been completed on the CECO. system. the l program provides comparative data for three locations: (a) remote l from high voltage transmission lines for the ambient ozone level of the area; (b) adjacent to a 345 kV switchyard; and (c) on the ROW of the existing 765 kV transmission line presently in operation on the CECO. system.
| |
| O 3.9-4
| |
| : g. . . . , . . . . -.- - . - --
| |
| E s
| |
| +
| |
| 'Y -Braidwood ER-OLS ' AMENDMENT 1 4
| |
| c(J
| |
| 'A - ,
| |
| . FEBRUARY 1983 ,
| |
| The automatic recording _ instruments at the three locations were rotated to' provide the highest possible reliability for comparitive readings.
| |
| .Instrbments-that recorded temperature, dew point, wind direction ,
| |
| and. velocity and barometric pressure were installed at the ambient location. The weather data obtained were similar to that taken by
| |
| :the Weather Bureau at-O' Hare Field. Therefore, the O' Hare weather i information was used for this study.
| |
| ~
| |
| The results of the test program show that transmission lines have no measurable effect on the ozone present in the atmosphere. These results are published in final report form under IEEE Paper T 74 i' 057-6 " Field Investigation of Ozone Adjacent to High-Voltage Trans--
| |
| J mission Lines" TBrabets and Fern 1974).
| |
| 3.9.8 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
| |
| ! It is CECO's policy to choose transmission line routes that have the least environmental impact. Since most of the- R0W's run through nearly flat and already cleared agricultural land or along an existing transmission line R0W, very little new clearing will-be ;
| |
| O necessary. Woodland will be clearned only to the extent necessary L
| |
| U to maintain transmission security. No long term disruption to the
| |
| , wildlife of this region is expected since R0W's are ecologically suited to a mixed type of habitat (hedgerows, open woodland, and I
| |
| cultivated fields) .
| |
| The more sensitive areas are the riparian zones along the Kankakee
| |
| , River and the intermittent marshland areas. The riparian zone at the crossing of the river is approximately 7.5 acres. The marsh-lands are small.and discontinuous and can be spanned by the li:.es.
| |
| 3 Care will be taken in the placement and construction of the struc-
| |
| , tures in these areas so that impact on the existing biota is not
| |
| ; expected to be significant.
| |
| 1
| |
| ! The aesthetic impact of these transmission lines has been a major consideration.in choosing the R0W location. Placing lines in cul-tivated fields-in order.to reduce the biotic impact that would result from placement in wooded or. marsh areas necessitates an i L unavoidable visual impact due to the extensiveness of the already
| |
| ; cleared agricultural areas. Viewing exposure in these areas, how- .
| |
| ever, is expected to be-limited to the low density transient and local-populations. Most of the highways will be crossed at acute
| |
| . angles and at no time is a R0W adjacent and parallel to a primary rohd. By paralleling existing transmission whenever pnssible, the visual impact of the new transmission line will be greatly reduced.
| |
| D-
| |
| \~/ 3.9-5
| |
| . - . . ._,_,.__.,_.y,_,__ym _, _.._,%._.,,.%,._.,_, c. % _ %m, ,r., .___cm,m,...n,__.a ,,,,,y_,m.,, ,,,_,.,_p,m_.~.,
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 g
| |
| Visual impact will also occur whe~re the line crosses the Kankakee River. Scattered residential communities are located all along the river. The close proximity (0.25 mile) of the Braidwood to Crete ROW to the southern end of the Kankakee River State Park is not oxpected to produce a significant visual impact. The immediate crea is not influenced by residential communities and visitor view-ing from within tha park is largely blocked by open woodland vege-totion.
| |
| The environmental impact of induced or conducted ground currents associated with the transmission of electric power from the Braiowood Station is expected to be very little because the trans-mission line ROW passes through mainly agricultural areas. The donsity of underground piping or cable systems existing in these creas is expected to be low, thereby minimizing the potential for induced or conducted ground currents.
| |
| It is CECO's policy that no building remain on the R0W. With the use of angle towers most of the buildings can be bypassed, thereby averting residential disruption. The route selection process in-cludes considering the areas where the least amount of residential disruption will occur. In the few cases where the buildings cannot be avuided, the residents may choose either to have CECO. relocate their structures or to have CECO. pay the owners due compensation
| |
| ~
| |
| g for their residences.
| |
| 3.
| |
| | |
| ==9.9 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
| |
| S OF TRANSMISSION ROUTING Tne transmission system associated with the Braidwood Station will be routed over agricultural land for the majority of its distance.
| |
| There are several smaller areas of either pure forest lands or mixed forest-field areas. In those areas where agricultural land is crossed, farming will be possible on the R0W af ter the erection of the structures. Those areas of forest where trees will have to be cut will be small, and the procedure will use proven techniques to selectively eliminate only that vegetation necessary for struc-ture and line clearance and safety. Erosion will be kept to a
| |
| ; minimum by using existing elevation grades along the routes, locat-1 ing structures in crrek areas well back from bank edges, and re-garding techniques. Special consideration will be given during construction to allow only minimal environmental degradation.
| |
| l 3.9-6 g
| |
| | |
| -Braidwood ER-OLS fm%)
| |
| TABLE 3.9-1
| |
| ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS OF'THE NEW BRAIDWOOD-CRETE TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR-VALUE PARAMETER (Miles) (%) (acres)
| |
| Length 55.125 2100 Agricultural 48 87 1826 '
| |
| Open Woodland and Hedge Rows 3.375 6 129 Riparian Woodland 2.75 5- 105 Intermittent Marshes 1 2 40 Creeks Crossed 11
| |
| ~
| |
| Rivers Crossed Kankakee Highways Crossed Major F.A.I. 57 Calumet Expr. - Illinois 394 Minor Illinois Route 113 Dixie Hwy. Illinois 1 U.S. Route 45 & 52 Illinois Route 102 RR's Crossed Norfolk and Western Illinois Central Gulf Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul
| |
| & Pacific Chicago and Eastern Illinois 3.9-7 O
| |
| | |
| 1 h
| |
| , , /
| |
| J h \
| |
| N 6
| |
| " )
| |
| Kf MOAtt _ _ CO.
| |
| GRUN0V Co.
| |
| seassammmensumanes NEW 345KV LINE g
| |
| = EXISTING 345Ky LINE so h#) e is p# 8" I
| |
| -e ey ,,e (
| |
| NN
| |
| 'd - COA YF 9:
| |
| g if 1/
| |
| BRAIDWOOD #
| |
| , k
| |
| : p. PLANT 3 LASALLE CO. -
| |
| GENERATING
| |
| / ""4 STATION
| |
| =
| |
| g 8
| |
| 53 h7) : __
| |
| 5" "''
| |
| ll o . . '' .AnoNE.
| |
| l
| |
| / 4
| |
| ''y
| |
| /, s 1
| |
| l i A _ _ . - . . .. - ~ - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - -
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 1
| |
| ' FEBRUARY 1983 ,,,,,,,
| |
| TSSH 1
| |
| /
| |
| e 9 W ,
| |
| - / ,.
| |
| f,, %,
| |
| 5 O EAST / GH T .
| |
| TSS 5 [ ..
| |
| gp00uTS$
| |
| ~ ~
| |
| C'g ---
| |
| PARK FOREST g g l l CRETE l ELWOOD TSS I ARSENAL p * #-
| |
| 87 =Y g
| |
| _ / (P f PE0 TONE y k I j i
| |
| ~lLMINGTM E""'"'''"'''"' " ' "'" " "'' "''" '22222222~~ 22~ -
| |
| AEECHER 2-
| |
| }
| |
| E WILL Co.
| |
| l 5 KANKAKEE CO.
| |
| .! ~
| |
| E 1
| |
| MANTEN0
| |
| , "We -
| |
| I KANKAKEE :
| |
| I DAVl3 ILL Co. ..
| |
| RIVER co. .T $ CREEK yEg -
| |
| set TSS
| |
| =
| |
| heesessessesseessesseseessesses seest BOURBONNAIS S s BRADLEY
| |
| \KANKAKEE 2 MILES n , 3 3 4 3 ,,,,,
| |
| I N SCALE BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNITS I 82 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE FIGURE 3.9-1 TRANSMISSION CONNECTIONS
| |
| .i
| |
| | |
| t 2 AW s g 4 A 76S KV LINE PROPOSEO 34SKv/
| |
| IS8KY 4-CIRCulf D / STRUCTURE p M ant 4. acha ,.n=: 2 A
| |
| -,lr- -=-
| |
| C.it. CO. 8 C.E. CO.
| |
| l f R.O W. R.O.W. g
| |
| \ '
| |
| <-- wtw cumte 250' 42S' l- 82'
| |
| , ei: 1 -
| |
| .L FUTURE S. M' 1 76S KV LINE
| |
| / .-u- -
| |
| 45S' R.O.W.
| |
| , ; I SECTION C-D 1000' SPANS 0.64 MILES MDN ''.%' "
| |
| % (LOOKING FROM 8RAsOWOOO) l e A . g C. E. CO. 1 l 9 l %
| |
| l 7 8 } R.O.W.
| |
| --- :-- = 12S'
| |
| , , u ,, g ,,,,, _ -
| |
| _.L : .
| |
| ::s ,
| |
| f , * [ '30 1000
| |
| [ ; 1 l ,
| |
| , ,/ (LOOKipe l '41 l* .'Sg '. g esosiv 6.osoe Sac 2. PEDFC>et I , k ..
| |
| - }, '" ''\ _ ),'
| |
| l a*\ ** y / ' ' '-
| |
| - m' -
| |
| . }o .
| |
| ' -)'o - _ }n-f4 k........ '
| |
| ~
| |
| -} _. *% 't b- *% l,_
| |
| 4-
| |
| -h- - ). - - }. - - }, .
| |
| -a h
| |
| M e 1 i __
| |
| I . I \ l
| |
| *d l i ss
| |
| _ e. . -.i_/
| |
| i I 1
| |
| - 1, _ _ ,i,
| |
| _;; _ ,i ! / (j - (_n_lL 5 u- _ ,I. _.
| |
| if -x_1 1_,_
| |
| i ' ' ' '
| |
| ) i i
| |
| ' ' i CouT. eeu:Per i "E I I [ l l ' l I WGMT PROPOSEO 345 KV OOUSLE CIRCulf STRUCTURE A'W L FUTURE 76 SKY LINE M A PROPOSED 34S Kv/
| |
| 138 KV 4 CIRCulf C. E. C O. , j C.E. CO. STPUCTURE R.O.W. i R.O.W. -
| |
| 82 S' 1 ;
| |
| 12 3' : - VARIES 82'-t S7 *-e-PROPOSED 3 50'- 40S' a.O W. = d A BRAIDWOO SECTION A-B ( FUTURE
| |
| [j .} ts 1000' SPANS, 7.5 M:LES (LOOKING FROM SRAIOWOOO) 76 SKY LINE y s p 33 E *e-2-* C E. CO. C. E. CO, W
| |
| I
| |
| ] Eid R.O.W . R O.W.
| |
| , , ,,,. ,,,. v.R ES <
| |
| 8 2'-t S 7'
| |
| _ g.p _ ,
| |
| Je *g
| |
| _ gy_ ( 54'. 4 6 8n3:4 330,- 405, l . I e38 saw L saov
| |
| * I __ u u
| |
| (__ SECTION B-C, D-E
| |
| _'l.. , = 000' SPANS,13.1 & O.5 MILES
| |
| - ,'W E Lj._
| |
| J A . "4,. _ ), _ t'**'aGrROM 8MAiO OOOi
| |
| .w a, m,Y f :L
| |
| ; s
| |
| $/r./. _ ._ - - _ a __ .-
| |
| g .-gw. . .u.g; a
| |
| % .r * (BM f _[_ _(_ '
| |
| _l_ ) sw N.g 4q g#_ .L,
| |
| ; i
| |
| . . .,.A. . j. . .. . . _ j. . q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l _ _ _'_ _ _ u; g __ __' s,_ __,
| |
| ..q g ,,, f s [-.'o - i _ .',.( { _,L , ,
| |
| 's _ !_ q_'_..'_'_,'._!-,l._
| |
| o , f L f. , i
| |
| ~ .. - s . . _ _% . . _ . . . ,
| |
| .x , , .u i N- giq,j_._ i -
| |
| l l
| |
| - , , _ _ ,I. -. l _,.__l_.._
| |
| l !
| |
| - .l. _ y _ .
| |
| i i
| |
| . ,r ,, _ , .
| |
| ,I kD %
| |
| i I
| |
| i hli i
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| T'S S.142 h..- k...-+ EXISTING DOUsLE CIRCulT 545 KV TOWER ' AMENDMENT 1 7 CitETENr',SN N,g LiNE T suRNNAu Tss o st a Tss FEBRUARY 1983 .
| |
| ,t --- % . 1.
| |
| ~ ' ' ' '
| |
| l
| |
| .; . - 1 U l.
| |
| l l
| |
| u.
| |
| u.
| |
| u.i. 2a PRoPoSEo 34 SKY EXISTING l l 1 as l poueLE CiRcutT 76 SKY
| |
| -*--at -; e das el STRUCTURE tower l
| |
| 1 1. l ;
| |
| ww PRoPosEo 34suv/ -j' "[T
| |
| " - ~~ -
| |
| sse xv 4. circuit i i "#as **
| |
| \
| |
| e structure -ar- as!;2l Einen /
| |
| r g'A 4, l ; *(
| |
| .y ....
| |
| , k g A
| |
| /**!9" "
| |
| 1 !
| |
| c.E. co.
| |
| Z R.o.w.
| |
| I c.E.co.
| |
| R.o.w. }
| |
| . 1 7 .
| |
| i t d lh l .... l
| |
| * 1- '
| |
| I-7 . . . . .i : ,,3 i .s* :00*
| |
| ! ! ! I -
| |
| iso
| |
| * Aoo*L R.o.w. REQ'o : EXISTif0G too* R.o.w.
| |
| j aD R.o.W.
| |
| c.E. co.} =
| |
| -l-w
| |
| ! l 50o* R.o.w. -
| |
| 123, -l i s 7,-
| |
| caru SECTION J-K -
| |
| I o.o.7.
| |
| :m.a w 2so' SPAmS,17.o uiLES i
| |
| :u
| |
| [ c l (LooKING FRoM BRAlowooo)
| |
| 'lON F-G WS,o.74 CtLES
| |
| -'f -
| |
| Ross ccAiowooo : --t l I '
| |
| I *
| |
| *--' -'*- PeoPoSto 34Suv
| |
| ~. ) ooveLE ciRcuif
| |
| """ %. T [1 i j ; ' -' 'I I structure h
| |
| - e's . kl h I'
| |
| **L
| |
| -i._ 8' a. ; - a'4 as) ,, ,t gy. ( FUTURE I I l i 7 5My LINE i Le 1:2.15 i l
| |
| _,'3_ _ ,Is - ,I - ' '*L ' "_ ,7 ''T i ' ' K - a,s - c g, co, l c.E. co.
| |
| R.o W.
| |
| j,vR.o.w.
| |
| - ,l. t I.-4,1
| |
| .1 -
| |
| i
| |
| _ wl[.s y
| |
| M ;
| |
| ss % ,
| |
| i s- - = ll<..-
| |
| sis
| |
| * R.o.w.
| |
| . T.- -
| |
| ' 4/ d' a. co l (uusTED To 845' oNLY FoR A FEw PARCELS)
| |
| I l i t l' I -~ W' 6 co- '
| |
| SECTION H-J .
| |
| C looo* SPANS T.4 MILES ABCNE (Loogises FRome SRAlowoool wn.L i ! e t C4-
| |
| ! Go-w.musz., a.a l
| |
| l -a l
| |
| ,f' & .f' l i i t ' f l , J'* s3e av L. 000
| |
| ' , f'# .[ PRoPoSEo 34Suv/ PRoPoSto 34SNv
| |
| , I l tsS KY 4. CIRCUIT ooUSLE CIRCUIT i
| |
| i STRUCTURE STRUCTURE i-i-l'3 ''
| |
| i
| |
| /,, d'% ,,;;g g;;n,, ( FUTURE 34suv/
| |
| 1 I
| |
| iss av 4.ciRcuif l j % structure esE2l st!nm z /** l'* ^ W l
| |
| .'. . h_.
| |
| , ; c.E. co. I c.E. co. c.E. co. i c.E. co.
| |
| ( R.o.w. ,
| |
| R.o.w. ) g R.o.w. R.o.w. 7 t'.,V
| |
| <*s nh .
| |
| -n .. ! - n .. -
| |
| 14s' R.o.w.
| |
| - n..-4.--,,..-
| |
| ass' R.o.w.
| |
| - .r-j f SECTION E-F (Liu TEo To ses' owLY FoR A FEW PARCEW r34 35 0 0 5 g. 3 tooo' SPANS, o... MILES
| |
| [; la j -
| |
| SECTION K'-L (LooKING FRome ORAsowoool looo* SPANS, 7.75 MILES
| |
| .. _ . _m4amtts 'rwe* warsuo Tws' (LooKilet Froes ORAlowoool i s; i Gy 4y i .~ g
| |
| -I g:
| |
| F4- 1- BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION f"
| |
| j'g I
| |
| =gyl b.
| |
| ;T-l ,,i,, fr f'se i
| |
| 5 8 m. ''".ro, So' UNITS I 8 2 ENylRONMENTAL RtPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE p
| |
| . _ _ _ \. ., , _*tC I...... -[ ...
| |
| i FIGURE 3.9-2
| |
| _1_ _ 1, ,
| |
| p .w .g ROUTE MAP 8 STRUCTURE PROFILE
| |
| 'q ' -
| |
| BRAIDWOOD-CRETE R.0.W.
| |
| L . -. - - ; - - - - , ,
| |
| b
| |
| | |
| 1 1
| |
| AMENDMENT 1 l
| |
| ((_;) Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 l
| |
| CHAPTER 4.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF SITE PREPARATION,
| |
| -STATION CONSTRUCTION, AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 4.1 SITE PREPARATION AND STATIONS CONSTRUCTION 4.1-1 4.1.1 Construction Schedule 4.1-1 4.1.2 Land Use 4.1-1 4.1.3 Water Use 4.1-4 4.1.4 Monitoring Program 4.1-6 4.1.4.1 Terrestrial Studies 4.1-6 4.1.4.2 Aquatic Studies 4.1-7 4.1.4.3 Clam Bed Mapping 4.1-7b i 4.1.4.3.l~ Materials and Methods 4.1-8 4.1.4.3.2 Results and Discussion 4.1-8 4.1.4.3.2.1 Species Composition 4.1-8 4.1.4.3.2.2 Densities of Unionid Species 4.1-8 4.1.4.3.2.3 Configuration of Clam Beds 4.1-9 4.1.4.4 Clam Bed Mapping - 1981 4.1-9 l1 4.lA _T_ERRESTRIAL MONITORING PROGRAM LETTERS 4.lA-1 4.lB AQUATIC MONITORING PROGRAM LETTERS 4.18-1 4.1C AQUATIC MONITORING PROGRAM, CONSTRUCTION PHASE, EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES 4.1C-1 1 4.2 TRANSMISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION 4.2-1 4.2.1 Access Roads 4.2-1 4.2.2 Clearing Methods 4.2-1 4.2.3 Installation Procedures 4.2-1 4.2.4 Consideration of Erosion Problems 4.2-1 4.2.5 Effects on Agricultural Productivity 4.2-2
| |
| : 4. 2. 6 Plans for Wildlife Protection 4.2-2 ,
| |
| 4.2.7 Plans for Disposal of Debris 4.2-2
| |
| : 4. 2. 8 Restoration Plans 4.2-2 4.2.9 Environmental Impact 4.2-3 l 4.3 RESOURCES COMMITTED 4.3.-l 4.3.1 Land Resources 4.3-1 4.3.2 Water Resources 4.3-1 ,
| |
| 4.3.3 Materials Useo 4.3-2 i 4.4 RADIOACTIVITY 4.4-1 4.0-1
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 g Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 W TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
| |
| PAGE 4.5 CONSTRUCTION IMPACT CONTROL PROGRAM 4.5-1 4.5.1 Background 4.5-1 4.5.2 Responsibilities 4.5-1 4.5.3 Control Measures 4.5-2 4.5.3.1 Erosion 4.5-2 4.5.3.2 Dust 4.5-2 4.5.3.3 Noise 4.5-3 4.5.3.4 Transportation Access 4.5-3 4.5.3.5 Dredge Materials 4.5-3 4.5.3.6 Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology 4.5-3 4.5.3.7 Oils and Chemical Wastes 4.5-3 4.5A CONSTRUCTION IMPACT CONTROL LETTERS 4.5A-i e
| |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| O 4.0-11
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| AMENDMENT 1 (N-(-) Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 CHAPTER 4.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF SITE PREPRATION, STATION C0NSTRUCTION, AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION LIST OF TABLES NUMBER TITLE. PAGE 4.1-1 Vionidae, Sphaeriidae, and Corbiculidae Collected from the Kankakee River and Horse Creek Near Braidwood, Illinois June 1976 4.1-10 4.1-2 Unionacea Collected from the Kankakee River Near Braidwood, Illinois November 1976 4.1-11 l 4.1-3 Clam Fauna of the Kankakee River Near Braidwood, Illinois, 1909 and 1976 4.1-12 l
| |
| 4.1-4 Densities and Species Composition of Clams
| |
| ,in the Kankakee River Near Braidwood, I Illinois, November 1976 4.1-13 l 4.1-5 Scientific and Common Names of the Fresh-water Mussels and Clams Collected from the
| |
| ; Kankakee River Near Custer Park, Illinois, l fw 13-16 October 1981 4.1-15 1
| |
| (_) 4.1-6 Densities and Species Composition of Mussels Collected from the Kankakee River Hear
| |
| .Custer Park, Illinois 13-16 October 1981 4.1-16 4.4-1 Estimated Doses to Unit 2 Construction Work Force After Unit 1 Startup 4.4-3 l
| |
| l !
| |
| 1 i
| |
| I I
| |
| () 4.0-111 1
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 CHAPTER 4.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF SITE PREPRATION, STf. TION CONSTRUCTION, AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION LIST OF FIGURES NUMBER TITLE 4.1-1 Clam Bed Densities by Location for Total Pelecypoda in the Kankakee River Near Braidwood Station, Nov. 1976 4.1-2 Densities by Location for Actinonais carinata in the q Kankakee River Near Braidwood Station, Nov. 1976 4.1-3 Freshwater Mussel Densities in the Kankakee River Near Custer Park, Illinois, October 1981 O
| |
| l l
| |
| 4.0-iv L __ _ _ _. ._.
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 l
| |
| () FEBRUARY 1983 CHAPTER 4.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF SITE PREPARATION, STATION CONSTRUCTION, AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION
| |
| $ 4.1 SITE PREPARATION AND PLANT CONSTRUCTION 4.1.1 Construction Schedule A Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) construction permit for the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 and 2 (Braidwood _
| |
| Station) was issued on December 31, 1975. As of July 1, 1982, 61%
| |
| of the estimated $1.6 billion capital cost had been expended.
| |
| 4 Completion dates for Units 1 and 2 have been set for October 1985 1 7
| |
| and October 1986, respectively. The specific conditions for envi-
| |
| ! ronmental protection attached to the contruction permits are listed in Section 4.5.
| |
| The effects of site preparation and construction activities on land and water use are described in the following subsections.
| |
| 4.1.2 Land Use In the development of the 4454 acre Braidwood Station site, 130 acres are affected for actual plant building activities, including O 35 acres of woods and 70 acres of cultivated fields that will be changed during the life of the station from current use. There are
| |
| : also 25 acres of fallow fields within the station construction area. After building construction is completed, 20 acres will be i occupied by permanent physical structures (Edmonds 1974).
| |
| I The exclusion area around the station and switchyards includes
| |
| . approximately 300 acres, of which 120 acres are wooded. Approxi-
| |
| ! mately 35 acres of open woodland will be cleared for construction.
| |
| l The other 85 acres will remain standing. This limited clearing will maintain the availability of biotic cover in the Braidwood Station site area (Edmonds 1974).
| |
| ) Aerial photographic measurements conducted by Westingnouse Environ-1 mental Systems Department (WESD) during initial site surveys in-dicated that the proposed cooling pond will encompass 3540 acres, 4
| |
| and construction will affect 704 acres of cultivated land, 301 acres of fallow-field vegetation, 222 acres of woods and 2313 acres of strip-mine spoil. Subsegurnt Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) projections indicate that af ter the completion of mining in the area, the affected pond area is expected to comprise 2838 acres of strip-mine spoil, 204 acres of fallow fields, 117 acres of woods, and 381 acres of agricultural fields. Approximately 784 acres i l within the site will not be affected by station construction (Edmonds, 1974).
| |
| O 4.1-1
| |
| , - - _ . . . - . w --..,m4- .-m 9 --. , _ , . _ , . _ _ - , ._.,,-,----r
| |
| ---=--we---*---*ww rew+- -*="~~-*vv e +~ ~ - -
| |
| * f_ Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 Station and pond construction and' operation will reduce the
| |
| ~
| |
| : amount of total cultivated land by 651' acres and of fallow fields by 229 acres, but this: acreage represents only a small portion (less than 0.1%) of the 908,000 acres of farmland in the l
| |
| O 5
| |
| i
| |
| (
| |
| \O i 4.1-la
| |
| | |
| BrCidwood ER-OLS immediate area (Grundy, Kankakee, and Will counties) .
| |
| Some land h biota will be displaced from the Braidwood Station site into the surrounding already areaniches.
| |
| occupied where selective competition will take place for New habitats attractive to aquatic biota such as frogs, turtles, and some water fowl will be formed.
| |
| The Praidwood Station site is served by both highway and rail trensportation facilities.
| |
| Interstate SS is less than 2 miles west-northwest, and Illinois State Routes 53 and 129 are less than a mile northwest of the station. The Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, which runs parallel with and between Routes 53 and 129, is used to provide spur track access from the site to the main line.
| |
| The initial site preparation work has two stages. The first stage consists of stripping, excavating, and backfilling the areas occupied by structures and roadways. The second consists of developing the site with all necessary facilities to support construction, such as offices, railroad tracks, warehouses, wells, sanitary facilities, and power lines. The actual station construction began while these activities were in progress.
| |
| To accommodate the construction force, an onsite parking area was constructed, and a sewage treatment facility was provided. After construction seeded. is completed, this parking area will be graded and Existing roads on the station site are used as much as possible for construction activities. The only new roads are those within the construction area proper and a service road created for work on the river structures. A township roadway that entered commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) property was closed with cpproval of the highway commissioner of Reed Township. The abandoned by controlled roadway CECO. has no public access or use and is completely No county, state, federal, or interstate highway has been rerouted as a result of Braidwood Station construction.
| |
| The designated construction areas, access ways, and laydown areas were cleared to permit construction of the permanent station structures and facilities. In order to minimize erosion, a construction drainage development plan.
| |
| system was incorporated into the site Temporary gravel roads and permanent roads were installed with site grading and drainage facilities to permit all-weather use of the site for movement and storage of materials and equipment during construction.
| |
| Areas only temporarily disturbed by construction were stabilized by native vegetation. In all instances, erosion control measures cround the construction area were planned and scheduled as part of construction operation. To the extent possible, mechanical disturbances during the construction of any of the associated facilities were limited to the immediate construction site. In "
| |
| construction laydown areas, temporary diversions were constructed 4.1-2
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS
| |
| () Since there are no projections or encroachments on the Kankakee River flood plain, the Kankakee River was not considered to be adversely affected by the construction of the river structures.
| |
| The following special provisions were adopted during the construction of the intake and discharge structures:
| |
| 1 l a. All construction debris is immediately removed to prevent pollution of the Kankakee River.
| |
| i b. All riprap and seeding work is performed so as to j ensure optimum protection against potential soil erosion.
| |
| l
| |
| : c. Construction is carefully conducted to minimize increases in suspended solids and turbidity, which j may degrade water quality and damage aquatic life
| |
| ; outside the immediate area of operation.
| |
| 1 j
| |
| : d. All dredged or excavated materials are placed in a confined area to prevent the return of polluted
| |
| ; materials to the watercourse by surface runof f or by
| |
| ; leaching.
| |
| t i e. Only clean, properly graded riprap materials are used in order to minimize local turbidity.
| |
| : f. All cut and fill surfaces are well compacted, smooth, and uniform.
| |
| 9 Where required, a uniform and dense stand of healthy j perennial grass, free from bare spots and gullies formed by erocion, is provided.
| |
| The water supply and navigational capabilities of the Kankakee 4,
| |
| River were not considered to be adversely affected by dredging or other site preparation and construction activities.
| |
| , Flooding of the cooling pond area will result in a reduction in j land species numbers because of the loss of diverse habitats (see Subsection 2.2.2) and the creation of specialized habitats such
| |
| , as marshes and open waters. This should result in an increase of 4
| |
| waterfowl and shore-bird species. Although the Braidwood Station site is not situated along any major flyway corridor for j migratory waterfowl, except for geese, the possibility exists that as a result of the relatively warm pond water temperatures
| |
| ; during winter and early spring migratory periods, waterfowl may j be attracted to the pond's ice-f ree water. Only small numbers of j geese normally would be expected to stop at intermittent water areas along their migratory route.
| |
| 1 Aquatic vegetation is expected to develop in areas of pond i shoreline, island perimeter, and throughout areas of low water i depth. Plant development and growth will depend on water turbidity, water quality, and growth substrate. Vegetation may 4.1-5 1
| |
| | |
| I Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 g FEBRUARY 1983 w establish additional supporting factors for waterfowl feeding and nasting areas.
| |
| Aquatic mammals, reptiles, and amphibians are also expected to increase in population density as a result of the pond formation for two reasons. First, the pond should provide adequate habitat for these species, and second, the relatively warm air and water temperatures may result in increased winter activities.
| |
| The construction of the essential service water cooling pond and pond screenhouse will have no impact on the local groundwater regime since the pond and screenhouse will be built within the area scaled off from the sand aquifer by the dike.
| |
| Dswatering operations consist of pumping only from collector ditches and therefore, do not significantly af fect groundwater levels. Eight piezameter wells were installed around the Braidwood Station main building excavation and are being monitored to ensure that dewatering operations do not affect local groundwater. De-watering operations have not affected groundwater level or quality (see Subsection 6.1. 2) .
| |
| 4.1.4 Monitoring Program 4.1.4.1 Terrestrial Studies CECO. conducted 2 years of preconstruction terrestrial monitoring at the Bqaidwood Station site. The first year (1972-1973) baseline terrestrial surveys began in the fall of 1972 and continued on a seasonal basis during the winter, spring, and summer of 1973. The results and projections of construction impact concluded from these 1972 through 1973 studies were included in Subsection 2.7.1 and 4.1.5 of the "Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1&2 Environmental Report - Construction Permit Stage" (ER-CPS). The impact was assessed in this report and in the "Braidwood Final l
| |
| Environmental Statement" (FES).
| |
| To augment the 1972 through 1973 baseline survey, a program was designed for the 1974 thrcugh 1975 period. The results and conclu-sions presented in the 1974 through 1975 final terrestrial report further support the impact assessment presented in both the ER-CPS and the FES. The 1974-1975 report summaries are included in Sub-section 2. 2.5.
| |
| A comparison of the 1972 through 1973 and 1974 through 1975 ter-restrial survey results indicated no significant differences be-tceen these 2 years of baseline monitoring. Similar conclusions 4.1-6
| |
| | |
| l F Braidwood ER-OLS- AMENDMENT 1 r'} FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| ! (s
| |
| $ resulted in the elimination of a construction-phase terrestrial
| |
| ! monitoring program (see Appendix 4.lA).
| |
| t In order to detect the ef fects, if any, of filling the Braidwood l cooling pond, a terrestrial monitoring program was developed. This ,
| |
| j program consists of. vegetation documentation-before and after the i filling of the cooling pond. Consequently, any environmental ef-l fects c that could possibly be due to the filling of the cooling pond l would be detected by the surveys.
| |
| 4.1.4.1.1 Summary of 1979 through 1982 Terrestrial Monitoring Cropland 'is the ' predominant land use in the vicinity of the Braid-wood Station. Vegetation composed of trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants occurs along roadsides and on the borders of the cropland.
| |
| For the most part, the cooling pond has utilized the area formerly used in strip mining. Vegetation around the cooling pond is char-acterized by species which invade disturbed soils. The most promi-nent is cottonwood (Populus deltoides),
| |
| i During the 1979 survey most crops were either harvested or were ready for harvesting. In the following surveys (1980, 1981, 1982) crops were in their late maturation stage.
| |
| The surveys indicate insect damage and a number of common plant diseases on the roadside vegetation. None of the diseases are i attributed to act'vities associated with the station. These dis-eases normally co-exist with the local plant species to some de-gree. The more representative of the damage and diseases during the past four years include spider mite injury, oak wilt, Dutch elm disease, powdery mildew, tent caterpillars, pine-wood nematode and canker diseases.
| |
| The crops in the surrounding area exhibited diseases such as Phyto-phythoria root rot and nutrient deficiencies. Also, some crops had water'related damage. Monitoring of observation wells in the area j confirm that the slurry cutof f trench method of seepage control l that was used for dike construction has been effective, therefore, water seepage from the cooling pond is not a suspected cause of this problem. Instead above average rainfall and poor farming techniques are more likely responsible.
| |
| Inside the site boundaries, some vegetation displayed injury re-sulting from soil compaction or physical damage. This is attri-buted~to station construction activities. Moreover, other vegeta-I tion, both on and outside the site, exhibited inury from natural occurring wood rot or storm damage. There were some isolated cases off of the site where vegetation was injured due to farming opera-tions.
| |
| 4.1-6a
| |
| - _ , . y , , _ - . . _ . . .-m__m, . , , , - , _ , , .
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 g
| |
| None of the above diseases or injuries are considered to have been exacerbated by the filling of the cooling pond. Furthermore, none 3 of the vegetation problems occurring outside of the station boundary are considered to be a result of activities associated with Braidwood Station.
| |
| O l
| |
| l 4.1-6b e
| |
| | |
| Y i
| |
| s
| |
| : Ps .Braidwo'od ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| (_)i ;
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 4$1.4.2 Aquatic Studies J CECO. conducted 2 ' years of preconstruction aquatic monitoring at the Braidwood Station: site. The first year (1972-1973) baseline aquatic monitoring program on the Kankakee River and Horse Creek j began'in October 1972fand continued through September 1973. The
| |
| : results and projections of construction impact concluded from.the
| |
| -1972: through .1973 studies 'were included in' Subsections 2.7.2. ,
| |
| ; 5.1.3,,and 5.1.4.1 of the ER-CPS-and in-the-FES.-
| |
| 1 To~ augment .the 1972 through 1973 baseline survey, a program was t
| |
| designed for the 1974 through 1975 period. Field surveys for the i 1974,through 1975 program were initiated on the Kankakee River and 4
| |
| Horse Creek injMarch 1974 and were conducted through March 1975. j 2 This completed the preconstruction monitoring program. The results' of the 1974 through 1975 program are presented in Subsection 2.2.1.
| |
| i CECO.'s construction phase aquatic monitoring program began in
| |
| ~
| |
| 4
| |
| -March, 1977 and included seasonal sampling of Horse Creek and the Kankakee River during the years of 1977, 1978, 1979 and 1981. '
| |
| {
| |
| Sampling was suspended in 1980 due to the cessation of station
| |
| ! construction ' activities.- Biological parameters that_were monitored 1 i_ during the sampling periods, included periphyton, benthos, fish, fish eggs and larvae and water chemistry. A summary of the moni-i toring program objectives are-contained in Appendix 4.lB. Results !
| |
| j of the construction phase aquatic monitoring are found in section j 4.1.4.2.1.
| |
| i l- ' 4.1. 4. 2.1 Results of Construction Phase Aquatic Monitoring With regard to-periphyton collected from artificial sub-
| |
| : j. strates, most species identified during the 4-year study were dia-
| |
| ; toms (Bacillariophyta) although considerable accumulations of green j algae (Chlorophyta) and blue-green algae (Cyamophyta) also oc-l curred. The most productive station based on accumuler.ed biomass ,
| |
| i was located approximately 1000 feet downstream of the discharge j structure (station SL). The least productive was located in the I i immediate vicinity of the discharge structure (station 4R). Al-though there was no apparent relationship between accumulated bio- 1
| |
| ; mass and ancillary factors such as light, turbidity, or current, i increased diversities were apparently associated with reduced cur-rent. Any variances in the periphyton communities was reflective
| |
| : of natural habitat dif ferences.
| |
| Benthic communities in the study area exhibited comparable taxa
| |
| ! numbers throughout the study. Communities at three stations (sta-tions 4R, 4L and 6L) remained essentially unchanged since the study l The' stations
| |
| ! began.
| |
| !(:)
| |
| l 4.1-7 1
| |
| - -~--rtem- -+.ww~--r---,e %-,e m----wr.., +--,w-+,,m.--,.-,-ce,m--ww.-,---<reaw,. +cv..-wr,.-www---,,-w,m-w,, ww,,,--e,,,,,,ry,w.y.
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 llk (Stations 1R and 6R) shifted from a marginally depositional charac-tor to an erosional character. The dominants at these stations changed from 011gochaeta, Hexagenia and Sphaerium to Heptageniidae.
| |
| Biomass and density of Hexagenia decreased at two stations (Sta-tions SL and SR) although they retained their depositional consti-tution. Communities present in the immediate vicinity of the dis-charge structure (4R) exhibited no detrimental effects resulting from construction. Any significant differences in the benthic community were the result of natural causes usually related to substrate type or flow rate. Diversity values indicated that the communities were under little environmental stress.
| |
| Of the fish collected, no species were on the Illinois list of cndangered or threatened species, although the pallid shiner, Notropis amnis is rare in the area studied.
| |
| The numbers of fish in seine hauls declined over the study period and was probably due to increased water velocities and water depths. The electrofishing catch in August, 1981 was dominated by redhorse suckers (Moxostoma spp.) accounting for 51 percent of the total biomass which was the highest biomass collected during the 4-year study. Stations on the left side of the river were more productive than those on the right, reflecting habitat differ-ences. The effects of construction on total biomass and abundance of fishes collected at the intake site (Station 3R) were negligible 1 lll although there was a change in species composition. Most fish collected in 1981 exhibited slow growth and lower than average condition factors, possibly due to high water and turbidity levels.
| |
| Ucter quality was generally good. Phosphorus levels were high, but not unusual for Illinois waters. The trace metals of cadmium and manganese along with the pesticide dieldrin and PCB's exceeded recommended levels in August 1981. However, the presence of the intake and discharge structures had no apparent effect on water quality of the study area.
| |
| In summary, any variance in the biota of Horse Creek and the Kankakee River near the Braidwood intake and discharge structures was reflective of natural habitat or seasonal changes in the envi-ronment. There was no apparent effect on the environment from station construction activities. This conclusion was supported by the diverse assemblage of fish species which included a widespread distribution of " pollution-intolerent" species, as well as the more common tolerent species. Moreover, the water quality was good with the periphyton and benthos communities exhibiting only variations due to natural ecological conditions. Abstracts detailing the results from each of the four years during which the area was studied are included in Appendix 4.lC.
| |
| 4.1-7a I
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| ; FEBRUARY 1983 4.1.4.1 Clam Bed' Mapping A reconnaissance of the pelecypod fauna of the Kankakee River near the Braidwood Station was conducted by Nalco Environmental Sciences on June 23 through 25, 1976. It was found that clam beds were located upstream and downstream of the intake and discharge area and also in the immediate area of the intake and discharge struc-tures. A total of 18 species of clams was collected during this study (see Table 4.1-1). Actinonaisas ligamentina and Lasmigona costata were the two most abundant species collected from the Kankaee River (Nalco 1976).
| |
| In response to a request ~from the United States Department of the
| |
| , Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, a clam bed mapping program was conducted on November 2 through 4, 1976. The objectives of this sampling were to determine the configuration of clam beds in the aret, determine the species composition of the clam beds, and the densities of the clam species. The following subsections describe the materials, methods and rgsults of the November 1976 mapping program (Nalco 1977).
| |
| O i
| |
| 4.1-7b
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS 4.1.4.3.1 Materials and Methods llh A series of 24 transects was established across the Kankakee River. Twenty-one transects were established upstream and' downstream in the vicinity of the proposed intake and discharge etructures. An additional set of three transects was established cpproximately 1 mile downstream. Each transect consisted of four campling locations, one location near each shore and two midstream locations. Locations were chosen to divide the stream into approximate one-quarter sections. Once a sampling location had been established it was marked using a Hewlett Packard (Model
| |
| #3810A) electronic distance measuring device. Data generated by this measuring procedure were transformed by computer program and printed out as a map. Figures 4.1-2 and 4.1-3 were based on this computer generated map. Permanent reference points have been established and any location can be re-established using this cystem.
| |
| A 0.5-square meter frame was placed on the substrate and all unionids contained by this area were collected, identified, enumerated, and returned to the river bed. Because of the deep burrowing habits of many species, the substrate section within the frame was searched to a depth of approximately 6 inches.
| |
| Collections were made either by wading or SCUBA diver.
| |
| Tcxonomic keys used included Baker (1928); Parmalee (1967);
| |
| Starrett (1971); and van der Schalie (1938). Dr. Max Matteson of the University of Illinois was also consulted for taxonomic ll verifications.
| |
| 4.1.4.3.2 Results and Discussion 4.1.4.3.2.1 Species composition A total of 13 species of unionids was collected during this mapping study (see Table 4.1-2) . Historical comparisons were m:de previously (Nalco 1976) . The additional species collected during this study indicated that perhaps only two species of unionids have been lost in this section of the river during the Icst half century (see Table 4.1-3) . Three species that were previously collected only as dead shells were collected live.
| |
| Three other species were collected during the November sampling that had not been found in June 1976. One species (Pleurobema corda tum) collected in November was not reported from this area of the river by Wilson and Clark (1912) . None of the unionid l cpecies collected is considered rare or endangered (U.S.
| |
| DCpartment of the Interior 1976) .
| |
| l l 4.1. 4. 3. 2. 2 Densities of Unionid Species D nsities of the unionids collected are summarized by location in Table 4.1-4. Maximum densities generally correlated with l
| |
| moderate to high river current and a substrate composed of sand 3 cnd gravel. One species (Amblema costata) however was most W 4.1-8
| |
| | |
| fr~ Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| \
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| ; . frequently collected from silty substrates in areas of slow cur-rent. The most abuindant; clam collected was Actinonaias carinata, which composed approximately 75% of the total clams collected.
| |
| ; 4.1.4.3.2.3 Configuration of Clam Beds 4 -
| |
| The almost continguous nat'ure. of unionid distribution was quite
| |
| ;. apparent (see Figure 4.1-2) . Maximum densities of Actinonaias
| |
| +
| |
| carinata closely paralleled maximum unionid densities (see Figure 4.1-3).
| |
| 4.1.4.4 Clam Bed Mapping'- 1981
| |
| ~
| |
| ! A mussel survey which duplicated the 1976 mapping study was con-f ducted during October- 13-16, 1981 approximately one year after completion of the intake and discharge structures.
| |
| 4.1.4.4.1 Results and Discussion 4.1.4.4.1.2 Species Composition A total of 15 species of freshwater ~ mussels (nalades) and the O Asiatic clam, Corbicula fluminea were-collected during the mapping (m/ survey (See Table 4.1-5). The predominant species was Actinonaias carinata (approximately 75 percent of total mussel fauna). Amblema costata ranked a distant second while all other species collected in 1981 were minor components of the total mussel fauna.
| |
| . Three fresh-dead specimens of Plethobasus cyphyus were found in a muskrat midden during the present survey. This mussel species is 1 considered uncommon to rare in Illinois but one relic valve of this species was collected by others in a 1976-1978 survey of the Kankakee River. Although Lampsilis higginsii, a federally pro-tected mussel, was last reported in the Kankakee River in 1955, no live individuals or relic valves of this species was observed in the 1981 survey.
| |
| .The 1981 survey yielded three species, Anodonta grandis grandis, Megalonaias gigantea and Strophitus undulatus, which were not col-lected in the 1976 survey. Only one species, Lasmigona complanata was present in 1976 but not in 1981. This speciet i s found in quiet water and fine-grained substrata, a habitat not common in the study area.
| |
| 4.1.4.4.1.2 Densities of Unionid Species
| |
| !- Densities of the unionids collected are summarized by location in Table 4.1-6 and depicted in Figure 4.1-3. Greatest mussel densities i
| |
| O 4.1-9
| |
| | |
| r 1
| |
| l' l
| |
| i
| |
| .X. 3raidwood ER-OLS _ AMENDMENT 1 l (,J . FEBRUARY-1983 occured in the. riffle section of the.. study area which wastapproxi-Gately; 2-4 feet in depth with a fast current velocity (approxi-- 1 mately.3 ft/sec). .The area was a predominantly rubble and inter-stitial. sand substrate. Actinonaias carinata was the dominant species in.this riffle habitat (maximum density: 76 individuals /
| |
| l mZ) . All other1 species were generally widely scattered and never
| |
| . abundant at any location with the exception of Elliptio dilatatus.
| |
| Although this-species was present at only one site, three individ-uals (density = 12/m2) were collected from a single frame sample.
| |
| 4.1.4.4.1.3 Configuration of Clam' Beds Maximum densities of freshwater mussels -occurred in the rif fle habitat near the-mouth of-Horse Creek. The configuration of this dense mussel assemblage in-1981 was similar to the configuration found in the 1976 survey._ Any density difference between the sur-veys were attributed to the natural variability.
| |
| Generally, the area sampled upstream from the riffle near Horse Creek was void of mussels or sparsely populated as was the area immediately downstream from the riffle habitat (near the area of 1 the intake structure). This configuration was comparable to that found in the 1976 survey.
| |
| The 1981 survey indicated a slightly more widespread mussel assem-blage present one mile downstream of the intake and discharge r
| |
| ! structures. However, relative densities in this' area were low l during both surveys.
| |
| Other mussel species collected in the study area during 1976 and 1981 were generally present in low densities and were sporadically distributed. Most of these species were collected at locations with a constant' current and rocky substrate.
| |
| 4.1.4.4.1.4 Impact of Intake and Discharge Structures Construction The 1976 and 1981 surveys indicate that the mussels adjacent to the intake and discharge structures were sporadic in distribution and low in density. Construction activities disturbed these mussels but, because of the luw density, this impact was considered insig-nificant when compared to the entire mussel community of the area.
| |
| No other impacts on the community were detected.
| |
| l l
| |
| 4.1-9a y
| |
| I L._-. _ __ _. _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _
| |
| | |
| Craidwood ER-OLS TABLE 4.1-1 UNIONIDAE, SPHAERIIDAE, AND CORBICULIDAE COLLECTED g FROM THE KANKAKEE RIVER AND HORSE CREEK NEAR BRAIDWOOD, ILLINOIS, JUNE 1976 Unionidae Unioninae Amblema plicata (Say)
| |
| Elliptio dilatatus (Rafinesque)a Fusconaia flava complex D Quadrula metanevra (Rafinesque)D Q. pustulosa (Lea)
| |
| QI quadrula (Rafinesque)
| |
| Anodontinae Lasmigona complanata (Barnes)a L. costata (Rafinesque)
| |
| Strophitus undulatus (Say)
| |
| Lampsilinae Actinonais ligamentina (Lamarck)
| |
| Lampsilis siliquoidea (Barnes)ab L. ventricosa (Barnes)
| |
| Ligumia recta (Lamarck)b Sphaeriidae Pisidium sp. (Pheiffer)
| |
| Sphaerium straitinum (Lamarck)
| |
| S. sulcatum (Lamarck) 3(( transversum (Say) ,
| |
| Corbiculidae Corbicula manilensis (Philippi) l l
| |
| l aCollected in Horse Creek only.
| |
| bSpecies collected as dead shells only.
| |
| O 4.1-10
| |
| | |
| n.
| |
| 9 p
| |
| %f Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1-FEBRUARY 1983 !
| |
| TABLE 4.1-5. !
| |
| SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF THE FRESHWATER MUSSELS AND '
| |
| . CLAMS COLLECTED FROM THE KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR CUSTER PARK, ILLINDIS 13-16'OCTORER 1981 j I Species Common Name 4 ,
| |
| Corbiculidae !
| |
| l Corbicula fluminea (Muller) Asiatic Clam l
| |
| ! e I Unionidae i Ambleminae f Amblema costata Rafinseque Three-Ridge Megalonaias gigantea (Barnes) Washboard j f- Quadrula metanevra (Rafinesque) Monkey-Face f E pustulosa (Lea) Pimple-Back'
| |
| : g. quadrula Rafinesque Maple-Leaf f
| |
| Unioninae
| |
| { Actinonaias carinata (Barnes) Mucket j I
| |
| Alasmidonta marginata (Say Elk-Toe ;
| |
| ; i Anodonta grandis grandis Say Floater j 1- :
| |
| Cyclonaias tuberculata (Rafinisque) Purple Warty-Back !
| |
| l i
| |
| Elliptio dilatatus (Rafinesque) Spike i .
| |
| Lampsilis radiata siliquoidea (Barnes) Fat Mucket l
| |
| .Lasmigona costata (Rafinesque) Fluted Shell
| |
| : l j Ligumia recta latissima Rafinesque Black Sand Shell j Pleurobema cordatum coccineum (Conrad) Round Pig-Toe t
| |
| Strophitus undulatus (Say) Strange Floater ,
| |
| O 4.1-15 i
| |
| }
| |
| | |
| TABL2 4.1-6 I
| |
| DENSITIES (no./m ) AND SPECIES C00tPOS1710H OF HUSSELS COLLECTED FROM THE EANEAEES RIvtB WEAR CUSTtt FARE. ILLlHOIS,13-16 0CT09881981 Wo./ me./ no./ me./
| |
| Locatina Tason d Location Tason el Leestion Tason e2 Location Tauen d 1 Lampettle ellieveldes 4 2 - -
| |
| 3 - - 4 == -
| |
| 5 - - 6 Actinenales carinete 8 2 - - 8 Amblema costata 4 9 Amblema eestate 4 10 Actinonales carinata 12 II - =
| |
| 12 - -
| |
| g Lisuele recte 4 y 13 Amblema costete 4 14 Actlnenales carinata 32 15 - - 16 -- -
| |
| 17 - - 18 Actinenates carinata 20 19 -
| |
| 20 4
| |
| g
| |
| [ , Quadrule metenevre 4 O
| |
| 21 Anodonte grandle 4 22 Actinonaise carinat e 4 23 - -
| |
| 24 - - 1 4
| |
| " 25 26 Actinon m
| |
| 12 27 -
| |
| 28 g
| |
| Qu.dr.,at as car..inat
| |
| .-at. .. a 4 29 -
| |
| * 30 Actinonales carinata 4 31 Laseinena eestata 4 32 -
| |
| O 33 - - 34 Amblema costata 8 35 - - 36 -- -
| |
| 37 Amblema coeteta 4 30 Actinonales carinata 12 39 - = 40 == =
| |
| Quadrule peatutose 4 41 Amblema costata 4 42 Actimoneias carinata 4 43 " - 44 Laureille sillauoldes 4 45 Actinonaias carinata 20 46 Actinenstes eartnera 20 47 -- - 48 - -
| |
| Amblema costate 4 Amblema coetate 4 Lampellie eilIiuoldea 4 Quadrola pustulose 4 Quadrule puetulose 8 49 Actinoneise carinata 20 50 Actimonatas eatinate 40 51 -- - 52 Actinenaise carinata 8 Amblema costate 4 q Cre toneias tuberculata 4 Laemiaone costat e 4 s
| |
| e WJ CD u
| |
| O O O
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 l
| |
| l (q-)
| |
| : c. l 2 ==
| |
| : =: 1 : : :
| |
| : )-
| |
| 3 3'. I I I - 1 I . ,
| |
| 1: i :: :i -
| |
| I
| |
| := 1 -
| |
| JE 3 33 3 1 m s s : = = a : : :
| |
| % a gq = g. =. .
| |
| 15 =
| |
| g~. : = . = . . . .
| |
| 8 : :: :: : : %
| |
| 36 . . : . : : : :
| |
| So ! 2 3 . a t i I I I I : 2 ji 3i: il: il I I -
| |
| li na 2 as a l 1 -1 la:
| |
| -i 83 :
| |
| rs _: : : : : : : :
| |
| is-) ] 3d
| |
| .o e .
| |
| 3 a
| |
| . .l 1
| |
| ; l- (=
| |
| ~q .. . . . .. .
| |
| s :g.
| |
| 3 3 2
| |
| : ya :
| |
| 3 8
| |
| . g. : :3 : . : : : :: . .
| |
| : 8. : :: :: :: : : :- :
| |
| .r : :
| |
| i :
| |
| : 2*
| |
| 3 m y I .. I :
| |
| :s 1
| |
| I 7 : : 3 3 : 3 3 .
| |
| 8= " 3 : S I I: 3 : ! =.
| |
| : :: :: zi : : : - -
| |
| 4 43 JJ 3& 4 4- 33 E :
| |
| ; g I _
| |
| ~
| |
| * R : 3 2 2 3 3 *
| |
| , 3 i _
| |
| ge g.. g., . << . . . . . .
| |
| =
| |
| : ]
| |
| j2 2 33 . : 3
| |
| - :: 23 _ r; i 133 ,!j : :. :- 3
| |
| .- a
| |
| . : " : : *- I ::
| |
| * I I I I 22: :22 3 2' : I :
| |
| l:::: 2::::: g 3 :-
| |
| 8 l
| |
| Jaf .za;
| |
| _-s -
| |
| 3 a .: a 5
| |
| 3 : : : 0 : : : : : : :
| |
| 3 4
| |
| 4.1-17
| |
| )
| |
| - .__ _ _ . ._ _ . _ . _ _ _ . , . . , , _ . ~ . _ , , , , ,_ - , . . . _ , - , . . . . , . . . , _ . . . - . - - ,
| |
| | |
| I
| |
| ('WS46.-;3,. .
| |
| 81 ,'ip ,
| |
| W,r, ,
| |
| ,8
| |
| * yb* hip ~
| |
| ' Niq.;.y:a..
| |
| i
| |
| ,ss 74 q ee. db -?
| |
| ;>.3. ,
| |
| v.,%+.no, ,.
| |
| O"F//w,,,%
| |
| / %.y.,
| |
| 'e . ' *.
| |
| / ..;D.h
| |
| [ ' #>y >iiggig,, ,
| |
| ,/ [__!!!fMi [ii.;kply::. 4g f "N,. 'n;. . . .m.,, /
| |
| . /;i %.;y4.["%g[*e e: ,
| |
| e 8 ''
| |
| I 84* 's .3.!f$kki:ijggy
| |
| ~'
| |
| \5:..;
| |
| i[4 a::t %p,
| |
| ': i n.. . , s 0, gft;; "/ ;.;)
| |
| w.. \
| |
| '' I!!! l! l lll ,l 3:
| |
| ;)
| |
| N, - l ;. !'
| |
| l.y :>R !
| |
| ,v .'04:@%s -
| |
| il. l$'/ f
| |
| : x. .s.s.. .
| |
| kk HORSE 5 CREEK - N 3,.
| |
| A.,. .,
| |
| -e
| |
| ' ' }.,
| |
| y 5.~
| |
| I LEGEND:
| |
| i
| |
| ] 4-8 / m2 h 12-24tm 2 0 50 100 150 200
| |
| .::.:, gg.gggm2 ~
| |
| i SC ALE IN METERS i
| |
| N ALCO ENVIRONMENT AL SCIENCES
| |
| | |
| e i
| |
| 93 S 94, 'E a 89, Sf.{
| |
| :4 ao. ^%.
| |
| </h g 85 6.
| |
| J;. h I
| |
| 87
| |
| ' b,'
| |
| MR.,:.f/,' g g k*
| |
| . ' *1y e
| |
| - '' 61 ,. $f Approx. I mile downstream
| |
| \ %4
| |
| \ < , *A. .
| |
| I V4..
| |
| 42
| |
| * i's-j aa. g., .s _. ,,,,.,_.3.,
| |
| if '.Wi(. l 'y $ e -
| |
| f 3 4, _
| |
| 21 g-- rx m . :-
| |
| 44
| |
| %l
| |
| : 30. [
| |
| /y/ //
| |
| //\ . 1 N!-'. 5 ' ~ - Il, ,l , '
| |
| 'lh'll,,llglllI.
| |
| l
| |
| -%.,fo 4 _'_.g / ; ,,, "-
| |
| l lglll]l][g,{',,,,,l,l,l.,i. ,, ,,
| |
| h' '''!i!!l, If ll'''8' i,'i ~i
| |
| * lfl!'!d' is . '! j' ' ,i,; 3.
| |
| %,. .,,1. g .,
| |
| g/g l ll l
| |
| ~ ''
| |
| CUSTER PARK 2 i 4l,, 4, m'%M.:. .i . g.,.
| |
| . . e.a. c,. ,,., y
| |
| {
| |
| 250 300 1 BR AIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERA 11NG S T A.il 0 N UNITS 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LlCINSE STAGE FIGURE 4.1- 1 CLAM BED DENSITIES BY LOCATION FOR TOTAL PELECYP0DA IN THE KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR BRAIDWOOD STATION, NOV. 1976
| |
| | |
| S I
| |
| a 4:ma w p k.
| |
| 81, 'U.?>;
| |
| '3 W. e$,w..
| |
| N 82 II
| |
| * g ..
| |
| 1 78
| |
| ??*$j;k 7 3 . ~K1 e.,
| |
| '');:
| |
| 8s,
| |
| . llgjip 'jjj;;, ,, '' y
| |
| .4, 7* . . es'Wnbp%g4th
| |
| %g
| |
| %.e.q; , ,,8 O . hffj 7o ,
| |
| [fiNhj((q,ksg%.
| |
| ""4, 7s 7i, ,/fe .
| |
| = 4, .7
| |
| $ * / /hgp
| |
| / h::.. @EN# @i%g#4 f Ng 5'g,,072, '*
| |
| * l , '
| |
| $ .a.. .
| |
| ' %3:gp2.:85ffc;, ,/ $l.S. . . . . . .NN.. g kg
| |
| $%5%. \ s" ''s N.p .,,f"W 64 * % g o n. :, :.y.:.
| |
| .. , e i*
| |
| 5 ^
| |
| g.2 -
| |
| \ kysf.-
| |
| \ ,c.
| |
| / k@Jg x
| |
| y:.
| |
| $ , t.z ~%qj {0, "g \
| |
| - A.%.?k- /
| |
| h hh!!
| |
| $5 ihll!!h,llb!!!!!!k
| |
| 's !,,,,l,!l
| |
| '4!'!d ll's 4 -
| |
| ^
| |
| 48 */ $ /
| |
| t.- ib- kplp;g y
| |
| :I HORSE i a , te...w .
| |
| 3 CREEK s 9.4.,ca
| |
| : M 'w;w. ..
| |
| r..
| |
| r .
| |
| PN k.
| |
| ff %
| |
| l% fIi
| |
| ?
| |
| LEGEND: e
| |
| ] 4-8/m 2 5 12-24/m2 0 50 100 150 200 h 2 8-5 6 / m2 SCALE IN M ET ER S N ALCO ENVIRONMENT AL SCIENCES t
| |
| I b . _ _
| |
| | |
| ( ,,
| |
| J n:_ '
| |
| 9 3 . ' 4..O.-
| |
| 94, "$i. .'.:,
| |
| 95 .'1 e 8 9 , 'Yn,. a 98 %).*; .
| |
| , 90 . ,o
| |
| ){ gj 85 i l -4 4 8e.
| |
| r
| |
| %N')./..Ip/, 87, j
| |
| .% 88
| |
| !in. ~'
| |
| l hy',7s 4 --
| |
| Approx. I mile downatream kg, l ' *
| |
| ..,3 l / f N)}kW f My:y .,
| |
| 33 [ ih. , g , g.fq@Iig 43 e 29 , '*
| |
| 25 ?lkQt ,' Q * ' g ;, ,;e,;g; g :
| |
| 8*
| |
| 44 ''
| |
| 26
| |
| . ,7 .s 17 is . 9M_", -
| |
| 30e N , iti 35 /# ',e,,',,''
| |
| N'g4 - " \'4 ''j'l i li,8'i'8,'l$,'i kTyt c7 ,,,
| |
| ,, ., lllglglgl:,, .. ..
| |
| " - 23 e D.E 32 15 7, 3
| |
| ' $'d5/*Ap 24
| |
| ,, ,, 16 CUSTER PARK "'^ # *
| |
| - ~q.,g),,k,*4%<y.'*h.
| |
| . ; . :: :.Q % '._0-250 300 ,,
| |
| puhucpCd I
| |
| IRAlIN000 NUCLEAR SEME R AllNC ST Ail 0N i
| |
| UNITS 1&2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE FIGURE 4.1 -2 DENSITIES BY LOCATION FOR ACTIN 0NAIS CARINATA IN THE KANKAKEE RIVER NEAR BRAIDWOOD STATION, NOV. 1976
| |
| .. ... __ _6 _ - . _ - .
| |
| | |
| 1 I I O, o O
| |
| 84 . '
| |
| as. ,, h.b. .
| |
| I MUSSEL DENSITY I4-=/*
| |
| 93
| |
| : m. . e4 "
| |
| : 79. ''
| |
| ,. [lTo'."*5'
| |
| '' ' f$ ' .
| |
| 75 . ::........;;g::t.;. iz - 24/=2 **.'
| |
| 7 ,-#4 4 y &4 .
| |
| g,ygg, )st. pgpSM g#(
| |
| 67.
| |
| ', 72 -
| |
| 2s+ /m 2 g ,ig, , . . a
| |
| //
| |
| = ', '
| |
| i p.i. ~ . .,y:,. : .
| |
| O -
| |
| r I
| |
| Qd
| |
| \
| |
| N0 *
| |
| ~
| |
| 3.- :
| |
| " ~
| |
| ,~
| |
| .. L_ -,
| |
| 3, .
| |
| . :, \\. * -
| |
| c
| |
| . '': O b
| |
| \ ?: n <"
| |
| ! 3; g .
| |
| A ~
| |
| nm mm z x
| |
| 5, M. gs @s%.W 4 .
| |
| w% zi. a.
| |
| %(
| |
| a.
| |
| : d. .
| |
| .Q: .x . ,,
| |
| m= g
| |
| -.ln < m. . V. . .p> 7
| |
| ' =n ;
| |
| 3.. 33.
| |
| ll
| |
| .2.,.
| |
| \\
| |
| - .... 22 r
| |
| == -
| |
| .: c,,,,
| |
| .. .*. 3,.
| |
| ,f._.m,t.
| |
| o .
| |
| 2.
| |
| i_EE . .,
| |
| .< .. .. 3 e 27. t.
| |
| v i.cli
| |
| .. ,3. .
| |
| '' 3,* . ,.
| |
| : 1. 3.
| |
| nm("" nm m
| |
| x20 .
| |
| 2-a - .' ..
| |
| xh. ' .* .A. . . u. M T 4
| |
| ! @GL m me i ~~5
| |
| * Wt-N$ W y..
| |
| :n- -
| |
| i
| |
| ., >m O U .'
| |
| AW x 1
| |
| X C g.,
| |
| n
| |
| ]
| |
| *3 2 "
| |
| O SCALE IN METERS be 5 g" s ; 3 H 1
| |
| i 4
| |
| W o
| |
| =
| |
| i
| |
| -_. . . . - . . . . _ _ . . . _ - . ~ . . - . . _ _ - _ - _ _ _ . - . . - - - _ _ . . - - . _ - _ . . _ . . - - . _ . _ . ____ _ _ - - .
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 ,
| |
| k'~.N
| |
| ) FEBRUARY 1983 l APPENDIX 4.lA - TERRESTRIAL MONITORING PROGRAM LETTERS TABLE OF CONTENTS P, ag,e, May 30, 1975, Letter: George J. Plim1 to S. Stanley Kirslis 4.lA-1 July 3, 1975, Letter: George J. Plimi to S. Stanley Kirslis 4.1A-3 August 21, 1975, Letter: Daniel R. Muller to Byron Lee, Jr. 4.lA-7 July 13, 1978, Letter: W. F. Naughton to
| |
| ; Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 4.1A-9
| |
| ( August 10, 1979, Letter: William H. Regan, Jr. to Cordell Reed 4.lA-ll i
| |
| ( 4.lA-1
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 Commonwealth Edison FEBRUARY 1983 O one First National Plaza Chicago htsnois Address Reply to Post Othce Box 767 Chicago, Ithnois 60690 v
| |
| July 13, 1978 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
| |
| | |
| ==Subject:==
| |
| Terrestrial Monitoring Program at Braidwood Station NRC Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 Reference (a) : {{letter dated|date=August 21, 1975|text=August 21, 1975 letter}} from Daniel R.
| |
| Muller to Byron Lee, Jr. concerning the Braidwood Station Terrestrial Monitoring Program
| |
| | |
| ==Dear Sir:==
| |
| | |
| In Reference (a), the NRC Staff requested Commonwealth Edison Comp rosea vroerany rorto submit o itori=eforesereview in,the or 1Fall of 19782 a pro-O Braidwood Station.
| |
| erreets *e 11111 In accordance with this request, a pre-t operational and operational terrestrial monitoring program is hereby submitted for your review. "This program has been tailored to reflect current land use practices and also information obtained by terrestrial monitoring between 1973 and 1975.
| |
| The proposed preoperational phase terrestrial ecological monitoring will consist of a fifteen (15) square mile aerial infrared photogrammetric program which will be implemented on an annual basis using two scales of photography. A scale of 1" to
| |
| ,500' will be employed for detailed examinations and 1" to 2,000' will be used for a comprehensive mosaic of the Braidsood site environs. Ground truthing would verify or discount suspected areas as determined by photographic reconnaissance.
| |
| Program objectives includes (1) Identification of ground cover; (2) Detection of diseased, injured and/or stressed vegetation; and fa r 4.1A-9
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 Commonwealth Edison NRC Docket Nos. 50-456 50-457 .
| |
| Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulations Page 2 (3) Production of a permanent record of the condition, quantity and boundary of each vegetative community.
| |
| A readily identified ground cover will enable the ctation t) monitor the revegetation of the dike perimeter, makeup and blowdown corridor, and station areas. This photographic approach will produce a permanent record of the rcvegetation progress and the status of vegetation in the fifteen (15) square mile area.
| |
| The proposed program will commence in the Summer of 1979 before lake fill and will terminate one (1) year after Unit 2 begins commercial operation.
| |
| Please address additional questions which you may have to this office.
| |
| One (1) signed original and four (4) copies of this letter are provided for your use.
| |
| Very truly yours, W. F. Naugh on Nuclear Licensing Administrator Pressurized Water Reactors cc: Region III, NRC 4.1A-10
| |
| | |
| - - - - - - - -~ _ _ _ _ . _ _ .
| |
| AMENDMENT 1 j
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 uenTEo STATES jqj, 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION masumotoa.o.c. asses 8
| |
| {
| |
| k**..*
| |
| DocketNos.STN50-456 i and STl4 50-457 AUG 101979 l
| |
| * 4 Comonwealth Edison Company 4
| |
| ATTri:' Mr. Cordell Reed j 7-Vice President le P. O. Box 767 l- Chicago, Illinois 60690 1
| |
| Gentlewn:
| |
| ! In your letter of July 13, 1978, you submitted for our review a pre-i operational terrestrial monitoring program to determine the effects of lake
| |
| - filling at the Braidwood Station site. Our staff has examined your proposed program using aerial infrared photography and finds it satisfactory in l most respects. The staff recomends the following clarifications or
| |
| ! i alterations to your suggested program:
| |
| : 1. Colored infrared film should be used, since it produces
| |
| } l more easily interpreted photographs than black and i '-
| |
| 4 white film.
| |
| ' 2. The annual photographs should be taken at approximately f .the'same time of year.
| |
| i
| |
| : 3. The program, comencing in the sumer of 1979. should continue for two years after Unit 2 begins comercial 1
| |
| operation.
| |
| With these modifications, the terrestrial monitoring program outlined in
| |
| . your letter is approved. A description of the results of the program should appear in the Apnual Reports for Braidwood Station.
| |
| ! t Sincerely,
| |
| ?, .
| |
| 1 -
| |
| / )
| |
| ,G.jf '. :ja'' /ti. . . .. .
| |
| i ' A ./
| |
| 1 j?, .
| |
| j Wn. H. Regan, Jr., Acting Assistant Director I for Environmental Projects & Technology Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis i
| |
| 4 O - . .
| |
| 9 4.1A-11 I
| |
| | |
| l i
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 '
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 APPENDIX 4.lC AQUATIC MONITORING PROGRAM, CONSTRUCTION PHASE, EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES i
| |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE :
| |
| 1977 Executive Summary 4.1C-1 !
| |
| I 1978 Executive Summary 4.1C-4 ,
| |
| l 1979 Executive Summary 4.lC-8 r
| |
| 1981 Abstract 4.1C-12 l h
| |
| O i t
| |
| )
| |
| i b
| |
| l l
| |
| 5 l
| |
| 9 i
| |
| r i
| |
| I I
| |
| l 4.1C1 O !
| |
| t 1
| |
| - ,...-.-,--_.-.-.._,.-__..._-__,~__.__u._-,_..--
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 .
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 EXECUTIVE stb 90UtY 4
| |
| his report presents the results of the first year of a four-l year aquatic monitoring program that was designed' to evalute the effects .
| |
| of construction and operation of the Braidwood Generating Station on the biota and water quality of the Kankakee River and its nearby tributary Horse Creek.
| |
| The algal taxa found in the Kankakee River and Horse Creek from May through November 1977 were indicative of an alkaline environment and were generally evenly distributed in the study area. The presence of many of the same species in the Kankakee River and Horse Creek would be expected due to the cosmopolitan distribution of many algal taxa. Horse Creek and the right-side stations downstream did, however, occasionally
| |
| - exhibit different trends in composition of dominant organisms which re-flected the distinct nature of Horse Creek and its possible impact on the river. Periphyton data did not indicate any adverse effects within ,
| |
| the monitoring area due to construction.
| |
| i A total of 158 taxa of macroinvertebrates were collected from the Kankakee River. The greatest diversity occurred in stations with bedrock-type substrates which yielded over 70 taxa each. Horse Creek samples contained 76 taxa. Substrate type was the most important factor affecting distribution. S e predominant groups were Oligochaeta , Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Mollusca, and Chironomidae. The density of bottom organisms in the Kankakee River ranged from a low of 3158 organisms a-2 in April to 10,889 individuals a-2 in October. Horse Creek was represented by a high of 2646 individuals a-2 in April and a low of 595 individuals a-2 I in May. Diversity indices ranged between 2.00 and 4.00 indicating I
| |
| O 4.1C-1
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 relatively good water quality and a varied benthic fauna.
| |
| Examinations of adult and juvenile fishes indicate a diverse assemblage of species including abundant game species and generally l l
| |
| widespread distribution of " pollution-intolerant" species, as well as the more ubiquitous types. Growth, feeding habits, condition factors, and fecundity of most fish species examined from the monitoring area indcated maintainence of good'overall conditions. Abundance and biomass shifts in fish populations occurred among collection stations and seasons but indicated no detrimental effects relatable to streamside construction activities. Nstural habitat differencas were responsible for most of the dissimilarities in fish species composition observed.
| |
| Drifting fish eggs and larvae were collected weekly in 1977 be-ginning on 13 April and terminating on 30 August. A total of 43 fish eggs and 1,374 fish larvae v ve collected during the 21-week sampling period. The most abundant fish larvae captured included unidentified cyprinids, Lepomis spp. , unidentified percids, Ambloplites rupestrisa Ictalurus punctatus, and unidentified catostomids, in order of decreasing abundance. The mean density of larval fish during the sampling period was 1.1 larvae /10 m 3 of water filtered. The highest density of fish larvae was measured in Horse Creek (Station 2) when 3.29 larvae were collected per 10 m 3 of water filtered. _
| |
| Results of quarterly water sampling revealed that the concentra-tions of the various chemical parameters (forms of phosphorus and nitrogen, biochemical and chemical oxygen demand, total organic car-bon, total alkalinity, EDTA hardness, and sulfate) varied seasonally.
| |
| Differences among the four sampling locations were minimal. Ranking of the mean concentrations from highest to lowest from the Scheffe's O
| |
| 4.1C-2
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDIENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 4
| |
| . 1 j
| |
| Multiple Cbuparison hat (0.05 level) was generally by date. Se ordering of the sampling dates, however, varied by parameter. mis 1 is not unconunon as the date at which a parameter exhibits its highest or lowest concentration depends upon many factors ihcluding, impor-I tantly, the season. Time of year integrates a number of conditions, .
| |
| especially water temperature and water level.
| |
| 1
| |
| * I e e I
| |
| e J
| |
| 4 0 .
| |
| O 4
| |
| e O
| |
| 4.1C-3
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENMENT 1 .
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 O
| |
| EXECUTIVE
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| | |
| This report presents the results of the second year of a 4-year program designed to evaluate effects of construction and operation of the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station on the biota and water quality of the Kankakee River and Horse Creek. Data collected in May, August, and November 1978 primarily documented deviations in communities re-flective of natural changes in the environment, since little stream-related construction activity took place during the study period. While documenting the absence of stream disturbance, this year's results also provided viother year of background date for the various biological communities 'f the monitoring area.
| |
| Periphyton collected from artificial substrates in the Kankakee River Monitoring Area in 1978 yielded a diverse flora. Horse Creek stations were among the most divarse sampled and some of the taxa common in Horse Creek were of similar abundance immediately downstream from it's confluence with the Kankakee River bc.t were of different abun-dances at other stations in the study area. Stations with high densities of organisms tended to have smaller organisms while those with the greatest calculated biovolumes had lower densities. All variations in biomass, densities, biovolumes, and diversities between stations were attributable to natural causes since no construction took place in the river during periods when artificial substrates were exposed for peri-phyton colonization.
| |
| A total cf 163 macroinvertebrate taxa from the Kankakee River and 48 taxa from Horse Creek were collected by benthic grabs during 1978.
| |
| The type of substrate present at each station was the most important factor in determining the kinds of benthic crganisms that were present.
| |
| Stations 4L, 4R, and 6L were composed primarily of bedrock. Stations lL, IR, and 6R were composed primarily of silt, sand, and gravel. Horse Creek was composed primarily of sand. Stations SL and SR were composed primarily of silt and fine sand.
| |
| l 4.1C-4 1
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS- AMENDIENT 1 f
| |
| ~ FEBRUARY 1983 i
| |
| D .
| |
| He greatest number of taxa was found at stations 4L, 4R, and 6L ,
| |
| with over 73 taxa at each stations the remaining stations, excluding Station 6R, had 41-55 different taxa. The seasonal relative abundance in the Kankakee River was 763,1,549, and 1,998 individuals a-2 during May, August, and November, respectively. In Horse Creek, the relative abundance was 372, 1,377, and 2,912 individuals ( 2 during May, August, and November, respectively. The seasonal biomass in the Kankakee River
| |
| ' was 4,302, 2,334, and 3,977 og ( 2 during May, August, and November, respectively. In Horse Creek, the biomass was 320, 1,062, and 1,914 i og m-2 during May, August, and November, respectively.
| |
| I 4
| |
| The diversity index values generally ranged from 3.00 to 4.50, r
| |
| indicating a relatively clean river, with a variety of organisms pre-
| |
| , sent.
| |
| i i One hundred fifty-eight macroinvertebrate taxa were collected from
| |
| ) artificial substrates in the Kankakee River and 108 taxa were collected
| |
| ' from Horse Creek during the three exposure periods of 1978. Spring
| |
| ! comunities in the Kankakee River were dominated by immature insects of the filter feeding and herbivore trophic levels. Larvae of the black .
| |
| fly, Simullum, predominated most stations. The Horse Creek comunity was dominated in spring by 011gochaeta and Chironomidae. Mayflies of j the collecting-scraping family, Heptagoniidae, accounted for one-third l
| |
| of the total summer Kankakee River abundance and were predominant at most stations during this period. Sumer comunities at the two Horse ,
| |
| f Creek stations differed in many respects, but were both dominated by herbivore-detritivores comon in lotic depositional situations. The -
| |
| 4 fall communities at all Kankakee River sampling locations were pre-
| |
| * i I
| |
| dominated by midges of the subfamily Orthocladiinae. Diversity values
| |
| ! for the three collection periods ranged from 1.81 to 4.70. Analysis of taxonomic compositions, numbers of individuals, numbers of taxa, and diversity values of consunities colonizing artificial substrates indi-f cated that the water quality of the Kankakee River' and Horse Creek was good during the three exposure periods. Increased levels of suspended solids caused by streamside construction activity during the fall ex-4.1C-5 1
| |
| j
| |
| | |
| Brnidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 l FEBRUARY 1983 l posure period apparently did not cause consnunities located downstream of the activity to differ from communities at other sampling locations.
| |
| Square frame and bongo samplers were used to collect ichthyoplankton drift from 17 April to 30 August 1978. A total of 5,178 fish larvae were collected with square frame samplers while 5,883 were collected with bongo samplers. Fcr most taxonomic groups, numbers of larvae collect M per cubic meter of water sampled were greater in Horse Creek than in the Kankakee River at the N&W Railroad bridge. Group A percid larvae was the only group which had a greater absolute abundance in Horse Creek than at the railroad bridge.
| |
| A total of 53 adult and juvenile fish species were collected during 1978, bringing the total number of discrete fishes to 68 for the two years of study of the sonitoring area. Many of the cournon species are noted for their intolerance of polluted conditions and are indicative of the good water quality and diverse habitat that typifies the study site. Differences in species composition and abundance, as measured by seine, electroshocker, and hoop net, were related to habitat variations and changed between sampl,ing sites as natural conditions fluctuated. Set.ne collecting sites were consistantly deviant from others during a period when little rele-vant construction activity occurred. 7ecation 5 also harbored a different composition of fishes than other areas since it was more lake-like than riverine.
| |
| A creel survey of the lower Kankakee River was conducted during the open water season of 1978. Results indicate the majority of fishing effort was expended in those sections of the river open to public use.
| |
| Most fishermen did not fish for any particular species, though fishing effort expended on channel catfish, smallmouth bass, and walleye was high relative to other species. An estimated 1,205 fish weighing 540.8 kilograms were caught during the survey year. In decreasing order of numbers of fish caught carp, channel catfish, smallmouth bass, shorthead redhorse, freshwater drum, and rock bass were species most frequently 9
| |
| 4.1c-6
| |
| | |
| -Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| '' FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| : O caught. Biomass of the catch was dominated by carp, channel catfish, l
| |
| l shorthead redhorse, smallmouth bass, gciden redhorse, and freshwater drum, respectively. The mean annual catch rate for all species was 0.097
| |
| ' fish and 43.204 grams of fish per manhour of effort. Fishing success declined as the survey year progressed from spring through fall. Most i fishermen still-fished from shore with natural bait and ' resided 26-50 ,
| |
| miles from the section they were fishing.
| |
| Water quality of the Kankakee River Monitoring Area was good with respect to most parameters studied in 1978. Turbidity rose downstream J
| |
| of intensive construction a ;tivities at the Braidwood intake site, but i
| |
| returned to normal levels in only a short period and remained at normal levels further downstream. Turbidity increases were small compared to k natural fluctuations that occurred at all stations due to natural causes.
| |
| Significant variation in measurements was generally by date, which in-corporates river discharge as an important factor. Differences in water
| |
| ~
| |
| 'l j
| |
| chemistry between locations generally involved differences between Horse Creek and the river rather than between stations on the Kankakee River i itself.
| |
| I i
| |
| i i
| |
| i s
| |
| 5 1
| |
| 1 d
| |
| a
| |
| ; O i 4.1C-7
| |
| .i 1
| |
| - - - , - - ,- , ,, ,. _.--m - . . . , , , . ....,_,,_.m. -,m,-,y- . ,.._--m,.-wer,_,_.,., n - . . ,_., , -m. . , - - -
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 EXECUTIVE
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| | |
| h This report presents the results of the third year of a 4-year program desig~ned to evaluate the effects of construction and operation of the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station on the Biota and water Data coilected in May, quality of the Kankakee River and Horse Creek.
| |
| August, and November 1979 primarily documented oeviations in communi-ties reflective of natural habitat differences ar$ seasonal changes in the environment. No relevant stream-related constcuction took place during the study pericd, but dredging occurred before this year's sam-pling began. The 1979 sampling year, therefore, represented the first While documenting year since construction was essentially complete.
| |
| the absence of severe stream disturbance from construction, this year's results provided another year of background data for impact comparison during plant operation.
| |
| Periphyton collected from artifical substrates in the Kankakee River Monitoring Area aftei approximately 28 days of exposure yielded a g diverse algal flora. ,The abundance of the periphyton as accumulated biomass differed between stations and seasons in 1979. Th'e periphyton diversities were greatest in Horse Creek in August and November while Stations il and IR had the grer est diversities in May 1979. Some of the taxa most abundant in dorie Creek at times had similar abundance at stations downstream from its confluence witn the Kankakee River but These trends sug-lower abundance at other stations in the study area.
| |
| gested an influence of Horse Creek on the Kankakee River periphyton.
| |
| St aj ions or seasons with high densities of organisms tended to have smaller organisms while stations or seasons with the greatest calcu-lated biovolumes had lower organism densitics. No differences were observed in the periphyton comniunity in 1979 which could be attributed to construction activities that occurred in 1977 or 1978.
| |
| O 4.1C-8
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENIMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 A tot 31 of 163 macroinvertebrate taxa from the Kankakee River and 69 taxa from Horse Creek were collected by benthic grabs in 1979. The predominant taxa were Oligochaeta, Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Chirono-midae, and Mollusca, accounting for 89% and 93% of the benthic communi-ties in the Kankakee River and Horse Creek, respectively. The sub-strate composition was the most important factor determining the, diver-sity of organisms represented at each station. The greatest number of ,
| |
| taxa were found at Stations IL, 4L, and 4R, with 82-87 taxa collected; the remaining stations ranged from 66 to 77 different taxa. The aver-ace density in the Kankakee River was 2389, 1886, and 5526 individuals m-2 and the average biomass was 7023, 2552, and 6437 mg m:2 during May, August, and November, respectively. The diversity index
| |
| . values ranged from 2.58 to 4.66 indicating a relatively clean river, under little environmental stress, with a variety of organisms pre-sent.
| |
| Macroinvertebrate connunities colonizing artificial substrates were also used to aid in the assessment of water conditions in the area ,
| |
| of the Braidwood Nuclear Power Station and to provide baseline data for use in the future evaluation of plant operation. One hundred forty-six taxa were collected from the Kankakee River and 103 taxa collected from Horse Creek during the three exposure periods of 1979. Spring and sum-mer connunities were dominated by organisms at the filter feeding and scraping-gathering trophic levels. Larvae of the caddisfly Cheumato-psyche were predominant at most stations during these two seasons.
| |
| Other dominant taxa included the midge Rheotanytarsus, the caddisfly '
| |
| Hydropsyche phalerata, and the mayflies Baetis and Stenonema. Midges l I
| |
| of the subfamily Orthocladiinae (primarily Chaetocladius and Ortho-cladius) accounted for 56.5% of the total fall abundance and predomi-nated all but one station during this period. Analysis of community structure and diversity indices indicated that the water quality of the Kankakee River and Horse Cree'k was good during the three exposure periods of 1979.
| |
| The abundance and distribut ion of ichthyoplankton in the Kankakee dp River at the Braidwood Station intake site was estimated from cata 4.1C-9
| |
| - s
| |
| | |
| Breidwocd ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 gathered from two upstream sampling locations. Drift densities of 'ich-thyoplankton were highest in Horse Creek, a nearby small tributary, and l
| |
| indicated its importance as a nursery ano spawning area. Drift rates of ichthyoplankton were highest at the railroad transect in the Kanka-kee River and indicated that although densities of larvae were higher in Horse Creek, larvae were more abundant in the Kankakee River. The spatial-temporal distribution of the total larvae caught indicated that larvae were more abundant along the plant-side shoreline in the Kanka-kee River and that most larvae drifted during the dusk and night sam-pling periods. Factors regarding potential entrainment losses were assessed and indicated that ichthyoplankton comunities produced in Horse Creek may be preferentially entrained during some flow periods.
| |
| A total of 53 different fish species belonging to nine different f amilies was captured during 1979, bringing the total number of species known to occur in the monitoring area from 1977-1979 to 72 fish species and three sunfish' hybrids. Many of the common species are noted for their intolerance of silty or polluted conditions and are indicative of h the good water quality and diverse habitat which typifies the monitor-
| |
| ~
| |
| ing area. Major differences in species composition and abundance, as measured by seine, electroshocker, and hoop net, were related to habi-tat variations ard changed between sarrpling sites as natural conditions fluctuated. Construction replaced the river's bank for a short dis-tance and then deepened the river directly in front of the screenhouse.
| |
| The effects of bank replacement depended on environmental conditions, alternately attracting and repelling fish from the new bank. Dredging furthcr altered the immediate habitat, averting much of the fish com-munity from that site. The displacement of fish from that small por-tion of the river was not detrimental to the fish oopulation. Fish tagging results indicated that while sedentary groups of rock bass, smallmouth bass, or other fishes might be forced to abandon the immed-iate intake area, movement occurred naturally for portions of each species and could not be considered deleterious. Fish were generally in good condition, grew well, and showed no unusual signs of stress, but should not be forced to endure extremely low water levels. g l
| |
| 4.1C-10
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 -
| |
| l e
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 The water quality of the Kankakee River in the Braidwood Aquatic Moni-toring Area in 1979 was good with respect to most parameters analyzed. Dif -
| |
| ferences in concentrations by date, station, and the interaction bet wen date and station were evident, but results varied according to parameter.
| |
| Dissolved oxygen was high at all times except for some periods in August.
| |
| Phosphorus levels were high, but typical for Illinois rivers. Heavy metals a
| |
| i had elevated concentrations in February. The pesticides dieldrin, hepta-chlor epoxide, and PCBs and fecal coliform bacteria were found in concentra-tions exceeding recomended levels during certain periods of the year. The presence of the Braidwood Station's intake and discharge structures had no l apparent affect on water quality in the Kankakee River.
| |
| }
| |
| j
| |
| !o l .
| |
| t i O I
| |
| 1 4.1c-11
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 O
| |
| ABSTRACT l A multidisciplinary environmental monitoring program for the Kankakee River near Wilmington, Illinois was conducted during late summer 1981 by a team of investigators from the Illinois Natural History Survey. This study was the fourth in a series, designed to evaluate construction and preoperational effects on the aquatic ecosystem from Comonwealth Edison's riverside intake and dis-charge structures for the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station.
| |
| The scope of this study included the analyses of the aquatic com-munities of periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fishes, and water chemical parameters during a single season.
| |
| Periphyton collected from artificial substrates in the Kanka-kee River and Horse Creek during the July-August 1981 exposure period after 28 days of exposure yielded a diverse algal flora which included 99 species most of which were found during July-August of previous study years. Most species identified were g
| |
| members of the Bacillariophyta (diatoms) although considerable ac-cmulations of the Chlorophyta (green algae) and Cyanophyta (blue-green algae) also occurred. The most productive station during the 4-year study was Station SL and the least productive station was Station 4R based on accumulated biomass of periphyton (ash-free weight). Several taxa were significantly less abundant by densities and/or biovolumes at Station 4R than at other stations; calculated diversities were also lower at that location on the river. Although there was no apparent relationship between ac-c aulated biomass and ancillary factor 3 such as light, turbidity, or current, increased diversities were apparently associated with i reduced current at the stations sampled. The most productive years during the study were 1977 and 1978 according to calculated biovolumes for many dominant taxa and major algal divisions; the same trends were evident based on accumulated biomass. Many taxa comon to this study have been found by other investigators in the same sampling area. Although Station 4R had significantly lower g
| |
| 4.1C-12
| |
| | |
| Breidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 b diversities, biovolumes, densities, and accumulated biomass than most other stations sampled .the stressed condition was apparently i
| |
| not a result of construction activities that occurred primarily
| |
| ; during 1977 and 1978. Greater diversity and biomass accumulations I
| |
| at Station 4R have been observed in other study years at different times of the year (i.e., May and November).
| |
| * The Kankakee River and Horse Creek were sampled during i August 1981 in order to ascertain the post-construction condition
| |
| , of benthic comunities and to add to the data base established during 1977-1979. Taxa numbers comparable to the first 3 years of the study were found, but mean densities and biomass were re-
| |
| - duced. Erosional comunities dominated by heptageniid mayflies were present at Stations 4R, 4L, and 6L. These comunities have remained essentially unchanged since the initiation of the Braid-8 wood study. The comunities of Stations IR and 6R, during August 1981, had shifted from the marginally _ depositional character they
| |
| ; exhibited during 1977 through 1979 to an erosional character.
| |
| Dominants at these locations changed from Oligochaeta, Hexagenia and Sphaerium to Heptageniidae. Comunities at Stations SL and SR reta.ined their depositional constitution, but' biomass and density
| |
| ] decreased from previous years. Numbers and biomass of Hexagenia at these locations have- declined dramatically throughout the I
| |
| study. Comunities present at Station 4R during August 1981 ex-hibited no detrimental effects resulting from the construction and ,
| |
| . pumping activities of 1979-1981. Results of statistical analyses revealed significant differences that were the result of natural causes usually related to substrate type or flow rate. Diversity values were generally above 3.00, indicating that the benthic com-munities of the Kankakee River and Horse Creek were under little environmental stress at the time of the collecticos, i Forty-nine fish species with representatives from 10 families were collected from the Kankakee River and Horse Creek in the Braidwood Aquatic Monitoring Area in August 1981. None of these 4.1c-13
| |
| ----,,.--rw.-- b w w wh yv'-- ww w w w 'w '' =
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 O
| |
| species are on the Illinois list of endangered or threatened species, although the pallid shiner, Notropis amnis, is rare in Illinois waters. More total biomass was collected in August 1981 than in any previous August collection. The electrofishing catch was dominated by redhorse suckers (Moxostoma spp.) accounting for 51.4 percent of the total biomass. Numbers of fish in seine hauls declined over previous years due probably to increased water velocities and water depth. Stations on the left side of the river were more productive than those on the right, reflecting habitat differences. The effects of construction on total biomass and abundance of fishes collected at the intake site (Station 3R) were negligible although a change in species composition was noted. No differences in abundance or biomass of fish could be related to pondfill pumping operations. Potential entrainment losses were avoided by pumping prior to the occur:ence of drifting ichthyoplankton. The presence of lentic species was enhanced by high water levels. Most fishes exhibited slow growth and lower g than average condition f actors, possibly due to high water and turbidity levels. The 1977 year class of fishes was important to the fish community in 1981.
| |
| The water quality in the Kankakee river in August 1981 was good with respect to most parameters analyzed. Turbidity and dis-solved oxygen values were high throughout the sampling period.
| |
| Phosphorus levels were high, but not unusual for Illinois waters.
| |
| Trace metal concentrations were elevated over previous August col-lections. Cadmiun and manganese exceeded standards recommended by U.S.E.P.A.(1976). The pesticides dieldrin and heptachlor epoxide and PCB's were detected in the Kankakee River. Dieldrin and PCB's exceeded recommended levels. The presence of the Braidwood Sta-tion's intake and discharge structures had no apparent effect on water quality in the Kankakee River.
| |
| O 4.1C-14
| |
| | |
| Brcidwood ER-CLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 rs 4.3 RESOURCES COMMITTED The construction of the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station -
| |
| Units 1 6 2 (Braidwood Station) involves permanent and temporary l
| |
| uses of land, water, and material resources. This section describes the resources committed during plant construction.
| |
| 4.3.1 Iand Resour ~es 1
| |
| In the development of the 4454-acre site, 130 acres will be affected by actual plant building activities including 35 acres j
| |
| of woods and 70 acres of cultivated fields that will be changed permanently from current land use. There are also 25 acres of I fallow fields within the plant construction area. After building construction is completed, 20 acres will be occupied by permanent physical structures.
| |
| I The pond will cover 3540 acres and will affect ,318 acres of cultivated land, 204 acres of f allow-field vegetation, 117 acres of woods, and 2838 acres of strip-mine spoil (Edmonds 197 4) .
| |
| Approximately 784 acres of the site will not be affected by site i construction. The expected impact of site construction is described in Section 4.1.
| |
| The construction of permanent f acilities on the site eliminates some wildlife habitat, which results in shifts of wildlife populations to other areas. Those portions of the site not
| |
| () occupied by the permanent f acilities or landscaped for aesthetic purposes will be allowed to return to a natural state.
| |
| The re are some unavoidable animal deaths due to construction activities (e.g., the coverage of nests and dens), particularly in the cooling pond area. During pond filling, small mamFals living on the pond site and not able to relocate to a saf e area i will be lost. Once the filling is completed, however, the pond I will provide habitat for both nesting and migrating waterfowl.
| |
| i l
| |
| Tr.e land that will be traversed by the transmission lines for the j Braidwood Station is mainly f armland. Except for areas occupied by the tower foundations, there will be no commitment of farmland resources during the proposed period of transmission line use.
| |
| i Any farmland disturbed by construction activities will be 3
| |
| restored.
| |
| 4.3.2 Water Resources j
| |
| No permanent ef fect on water resources is expected at the Braidwood Station. The construction of the river intake and discharge structures will permanently alter approximately 250 1 feet of shoreline on the southern bank of the Kankakee River. No l a other permanent aquatic disruptions are expected during the construction of the Braidwood Station.
| |
| J O
| |
| 4.3-1 .
| |
| | |
| Croidwood ER-OLS l 4.3.3 Materials Used The materials used for the Braidwood Station are of two types:
| |
| O those used for the construction of buildings; and fuel.
| |
| Construction materials include structural and reinforcing steel, portland cement, electrical cables, paints, coverings, and fixtures. Although these will be permanently committed during the lifetime of the plant, some of them can be at least partially reclaimed if the plant is eventually dismantled. The highly contaminated items will not be reusable. The discussion of fuel
| |
| ; consumption and of other resources committed during plant operation is included in Section 5.7. The decommissioning and dismantling of the plant is desc.ribed in Section 5.8.
| |
| l l
| |
| l 9
| |
| l l
| |
| O l l l :
| |
| l 6
| |
| 4.3-2 JL
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS 1
| |
| CHAPTER 5.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF STATION OPERATTON TABLE OF CONTENTS i
| |
| PAGE 5.1 EFFECTS OF OPERATION OF HEAT DISSIPATION 5.1-1 SYSTEM 1
| |
| 4 i 5.1.1 Effluent Limitations and Water Quality St andards 5.1-1 j ,
| |
| 5.1.2 Physical Effects 5.1-6 5.1.3 Biological Ef fects 5.1- 7 j
| |
| i 5 .1. 3.1 Effects of Released Heat on the Kankakee 5.1-7
| |
| ! River 4
| |
| 5.1.3.2 Ef fects of Entrapment and Impingment i
| |
| of Juvenile and Adult Fish on the 5.1-9 i Kankakee River l 5.1.3.3 Entrainment Effects on the Kankakee River 5.1- 9 5.1.3.4 Effects of Reactor Shutdown on the Kankakee River 5. 1-10 5.1.4 Effects of Heat Dissipation Facilities 5.1-10 1 5.2-1
| |
| ! 5.2 RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT FROM ROUTINE OPERATION 5.2.1 Exposure Pathways 5. 2- 1 5.2.1.1 Exposure Pathways to Biota Other Than Man 5. 2- 1
| |
| . 5.2.1.1.1 Terrestrial Pathways 5.2-1 1 5.2.1.1.2 Aquatic Pathways 5. 2- 1 5.2.1.2 Exposure Pathways to Man 5.2-2 j
| |
| 5.2.1.2.1 Terrestrial Pathways 5. 2- 2 l
| |
| ! 5.2.1.2.2 Aquatic Pathways 5. 2- 3 j 5.2.2 Radioactivity in Environment 5.2-4 1 5.2.2.1 Surface Water Models 5.2-4 5.2.2.2 Groundwater Models 5. 2- 5 5.2.2.3 Gaseous Effluents 5. 2- 5
| |
| ! 5.2.3 Dose Rate Estimates for Biota Other Than d
| |
| Man 5.2-5 5.2.3.1 Gaseous Effluents 5.2-5 5.2.3.2 Liquid Ef fluents 5.2-5
| |
| ! 5.2.3.3 Dose Ef f ects on Biota 5. 2- 7 5.2.4 Dose Rate Estimates for Man 5. 2- 7 5.2.4.1 Liquid Pathways 5.2-7 5.2.4.2 Gaseous Pathways 5.2-8 5.2.4.3 Direct Radistion from Facility 5.2-8 i'
| |
| 5.2.4.4 Annual Population Doses 5. 2- 8 i 5.2.5 Summary of Annual Radiation Doses 5.2-9 5.2A EXAMPLES OF DOSE CALCULATIONAL METHODS 5.2A-i F
| |
| : 5.3 EFFECTS OF CHBMICAL AND BIOCIDE DISCHARGES 5.3-1 l
| |
| I 5.0-1 I
| |
| - _ _ . . _ . _ _ _.....-,.,----_a-.___,-_..-.,....._.__., _,___-a_.___.--
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS LMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
| |
| PAGE 5.4 EFFECTS OF SANITARY WASTE DISCHARGES 5.4-1
| |
| : 5. 5 EFFECTS OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS 5.5-1 5.5.1 Maintenance of Transmission Right-of-Way 5.5-1 5.5.2 Periodic Transmission Line Inspection Programs ,5.5-1 5.5.3 Operational Aspects 5. 5- 1 5.6 OTHER EFFECTS 5.6-1 5.6.1 Introduction 5.6-1 5.6.2 Approach 5.6-1 5.6.3 Procedures 5.6-1 5.6.4 Noise Effects 5.6-2 5.6.4.1 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 5.6-2 5.6.4.2 U.S. Enviromen'tal Protection Agency 5.6-3 5.6.4.3 Department of Housing and Urban 1 Development 5.6-3 5.6.4.4 Preoperational Ambient Levels 5.6-3 5.6.5 conclusion 5.6-3 lll 5.7 RESOURCES COMMITTED 5.7-1 5.7.1 Resources Comitted During Plant Lifetime 5.7-1 5.7.2 Irretrievable Committments of Resources 5.7-2 5.8 DECOMMISSIONING AND DISMANTLING 5. 8- 1 O
| |
| 5.0-11
| |
| | |
| i Braidwood ER-OLS CHAPTER 5.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF STATION OPERATION LIST OF TABLES
| |
| : PAGE NUMBER TITLE 5.1-1 Summary of Temperature characteristics f
| |
| of the Braidwood Cooling Lake and the 5.1-13 Kankakee River Blowdown
| |
| * 5.1-2 Estimated Isotherm Areas Resulting from 5.1-14 a Discharge Into the Rankakes River l
| |
| 2 5.1-3 Maximum River Temperatures as Specified i
| |
| by Water Pollution Regulations of 5.1-15 Illinois 5.1-4 Updated Summary of Temperature Chara-cteristics of the Braidwooo Cooling 5.1-16 i
| |
| Pond and the Kankakee River Blowdown l 5.2-1 Concentration of Radionuclides in the Discharge and the corresponding 5.2-10
| |
| ' Bioaccumulation Factors 5.1-11 l 5.2-2 Annupl Average Site Boundary Doses
| |
| } 5.2-3 Dicpersion Factors (X/Q) and Deposi- 5.2-12 l
| |
| tion Rates for Points of' Interest i 5.2-4 Expected Individual Doses from 5. 2-13 Gaseous Effluents j
| |
| j'
| |
| (]) 5.2-5 Assumptions Used to Calculace Radio-nuclide Concentrations and Doses to 5.2-14 l Biota Other Than Man 5.2-6 Radionuclide Concentration and Internal Dose to Biota Other 5.2-15 Than Man 5.2-16 5.2-7 Pathways Doses from Liquid Effluents 1 5.2-8 Consumption Factors for the Maximum 5.2-17 Exposed Individual 5.2-9 Annual Offsite Direct Doses to Indivi- 5.2-18 duals Due to Contained Radiation Sourcer 5.2-10 Estimated Doses to the Population l
| |
| ' Within 50 Miles of the Station site from 5.2-19 Releases of Gaseous Effluents 5.2-11 Estimates of the Annual Whole-Body
| |
| - Radiation Dose to the Population Within 50 Miles of the Eraidwood 5.2-20 Station 5.3-1 Chemical Discharges of the Braidwood Station Including Leaching Effects 5. 3- 4 5.3-2 Estimated Maximum Concentrations of 2
| |
| Chemicals Discharged to the Kankakee
| |
| : 5. 3- 5 l River 5.6-1 Predicted Noise Levels Due to Normal 5. 6- 4 Continuous Operation i
| |
| 5.6-2 Predicted Noise Levels Cue to Relief 5.6-5 valves Operation 5.6-3 Comparison of Preoperational and 5.0-111 i
| |
| -.-.---,,.-,.,w. -
| |
| ,-,---,-.,,,-.,.,--,-,,-,-w,. - - - , , . - -.,,,,,-,,,,------,-,,------mew--.,--
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd)
| |
| NUMBER TITLE PAGE Plant-Operational Continuous Noise Levels with U.S. EPA Guidelines 5.6-6 5.6-4 Comparison of Preoperational and Plant-Operational Continuous Noise Levels with HUD Guidelines 5.6-7 5.7-1 Summary of Environmental Considerations for Uranium Fuel Cycle Normalized to Model-LWR Annual Fuel Requirement 5.7-3 5.8-1 Estimates of the Costs of the Primary Decommissioning Alternatives for Each of 3 the Braidwood Units 5.8-4 9.
| |
| O
| |
| : 5. 0-i v
| |
| | |
| '"T Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 V FEBRUARY 1983 The ext'ernal submersion dose to,small' aquatic plants and animals-is substantially.all due to the beta component of tritium.
| |
| 5.2.3.3 Dose Effects on Biota Under field conditions, it cannot be shown that organisms are in any way affected by dose rates lower than 1000 millirads per day (Auerbach et al. 1971).- For example, low dose rates seem to have no effect on such commonlyused end points as survivorship, fecund-ity, growth, development, or susceptibility ~to infection. It should be noted that when considering the effects of radiation on biota other than persons, populations are of more concern than individuals. Since the dose estimates presented in this report are conservative, it is unlikely that any animal population in the Braidwood Station site vicinity will receive annual doses approach-ing_the computed levels.
| |
| 5.2.4 Dose Rate Estimates for Man- !
| |
| The calculation of radiation doses to persons from radioactive effluents was performed according to "Models and Computer Codes for Evaluating Environmental Radiation Doses" (Soldat et al. 1974).
| |
| { } Examples of dose calculation models may be found in Appendix 5.2A.
| |
| 5.2.4.1 Liquid Pathways Expected annual releases of radionuclides are given in Table 3.5-3. Activity concentrations in the discharge canal were calcu-lated assuming an annual cooling pond blowdown flow of 43.2 cfs :
| |
| with 2 unit operation. Dilution of radionuclides in the Kankakee i River was not taken into account.
| |
| Estim'ated annual average doses to individuals exposed to radioac-tive liquid effluents from the Braidwood Station were calculated for pathways of fish consumption, drinking water, and recreational -
| |
| -exposure. -
| |
| Recreational use of the Kankakee River in the vicinity of Braidwood !
| |
| Station is discussed in Subsection 2.1.2.3. The estimates of ;
| |
| whole-body doses and critical-organ doses made for swimming, boat-ing, and shoreline activities are shown in Table 5.2-7.
| |
| An estimate of the expected dose rate to the whole body and criti-cal organs received from drinking water obtained from the discharge canal is shown in Table 5.2-7 even though the canal is not a drink-ing water source. Presently there is no public drinking water supply within 50 miles downstream from the Braidwood Station.
| |
| Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals has deactivated its its water purifi- 1
| |
| {}cationsystemandnowusesgroundwaterfordrinkingwatersupply. ;
| |
| 5.2-7 f
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS As noted previously, the Kankakee River in the vicinity of the Craidwood Station supports an active sport fishery. Estimates of doses received to whole body and critical organs from the consumption of fish are given in Table 5.2-7. Actual doses will be lower because of the conservative nature of the bioaccumulation factors and because the probability of a fish ctaying in one location is extremely small.
| |
| 5.2.4.2 Gaseous Pathways
| |
| . Expected annual releases of radioactive noble gases and particulates from the Braidwood Station are shown in Table 3.5-6, end estimated offsite doses to individuals from these effluents cre given in Table 5.2-4. Doses were calculated using the methodology of NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 (1977b).
| |
| Calculational models are discussed in Appendix 5.2A. Plume immersion , exposure to contaminated surfaces, inhalation, and ingestion pathways were all considered. Consumption factors for the ingestion pathways are given in Table 5.2-8 (Fletcher and Dotson 1971; NRC 1977b). An 8-month grazing period was assumed for milk animals, and a 10-month grazing period was assumed for meat animals.
| |
| 5.2.4.3 Direct Radiation from Facility The annual average external dose rates due to direct radiation exposure were estimated assuming normal station operation.
| |
| llh Estimated dose rates in the vicinity of the station are given in Table 5.2-9. The sources considered were the nitrogen-16 in the primary coolant and the radioactive contents of the storage tanks holding refueling water, primary water, and secondary water. All other major and potential contained sources are below grade level or surrounded by protective shields' and can be considered to contribute a negligible amount to the total dose rate.
| |
| Standard techniques of geometric and material attenuation were used in the calculations. Credit was taken for the concrete in the containment walls and the air between the source and dose point, but no credit was taken for partial occupancy or f or local shielding provided by buildings and dwellings (etc.) and by steel tank walls and liners.
| |
| The population exposure through this pathway, direct radiation from the station, was estimated DT4od on the projected population within 50 miles of the Braidwem itation in the year 2000. This calculation yielded a negliqa *H e annual population exposure of 0.018 man-rem / year for Bn;.+ac~ Station Unit 1.
| |
| 5.2.4.4 Annual Populat h Doses The population dose due to gaseous effluents to all individuals living within a 50-mile radius of the Braidwood Station was j calculated using population data projected to the year 2000. The 5.2-8
| |
| | |
| l Braidwood ER-OLS O
| |
| estima ted dose from gaseous effluents for the year 2000 population within a.50-mile radius of the site appears in Table 5.2-10. This table shows whole-body, skin, and thyroid doses l
| |
| resulting from exposure from immersion, inhalation, and ground deposition.
| |
| The population dose caused by direct radiation to all individuals' living within a .50-mile radius of the Braidwood Station was also l calculated using population data projected for the year 2000; it j is given in Table 5.2-11.
| |
| The population dose resulting from natural background radiation to all individuals living within a 50-mile radius of the Braidwood Station is given in Table 5.2-11. This dose was calculated assuming a dose to individuals of 135 mrem /yr and was based on population data projected for the year 2000.
| |
| 5.2.5 Summary of Annual Radiation Doses The estimated radiation doses to the regional population from all station-related sources are summarized in Table 5. 2-11.
| |
| O .
| |
| l l
| |
| O 5.2-9
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 O
| |
| TABLE 5.2-1 CONCENTRATION OF RADIONUCLIDES IN THE DISCHARGE AND THE CORRESPONDING BI0 ACCUMULATION FACTORS ConCENTTArlos RELEASED AT DISCHARGE ACTIVITT* POINT
| |
| * AQUATIC 910ACCUMUI.AT10N FACTots 190 TOPE (C1/yr) (pCi/11ter) FISH CRUSTACEAN MOLLU5K ALCAR H-3 3.0 a 102 1.6 s 10' 9.0 a 10-1 9.0 a 10-1 9.0 a 10*I 9.0 a 10-1 Cr-51 6.2 a 10-5 3.3 a 10-3 2.0 a 101 2.0 a 103 2.0 a 103 4.0 a 103 Ma-54 1.0 a 10-3 5.4 s '0-2 4,o a 102 9.0 a 10' 9.0 a 10' 1.0 a 10' Fa-55 5.4 a 10-5 2,9 a 10-3 1.0 x 102 3.2 a 103 3.2 a 103 1.0 a 103 Fe-59 3.5 a 10-5 g,g a go-3 1.0 a 102 3.2 a 103 3.2 a 103 1.0 a 103 Co-58 4.5 a 10-3 2.4 a 10*1 5.0 a 101 2.0 a 102 2.0 a 103 2.0 a 102 Co-60 8.8 a 10-3 4.8 a 10*1 5.0 a 101 2.0 a 102 2.0 a 102 2.0 x 102 B r-8 3+d 1.8 a 10-5 9.7 a 10*' 4.2 a 102 3,3 go2 3.3 a 102 $,o a 102 ab-86 4.7 a 10-3 2.5 a 10-3 2.0 a 103 1.0 a 103 1.0 a 103 1.0 a 103
| |
| $r-89 1.3 s 10-5 7,o a go-4 3,o a tot 1.0 a 102 1.0 a 102 5.0 m 102
| |
| . No-99+d 2.0 a 10*3 1.1 a 10*1 1.0 x 101 1.0 a 101 1.0 m 101 1.0 m 103 Mo-99d 2.0 a 10*3 1.1 a 10*1 1.0 r 101 1.0 a 101 1.0 a 101 1.0 a 103 Tc-99e 2.3 a 10-3 1.2 a 10-1 1.5 a 100 5,o a 100 $,o a 100 4.0 a 101 Te-127 1.4 a 10-5 *7.6 a 10** 4.0 a 102 7.5 a 101 7.5 a 101 1.0 s 102 Te-129e+d 4.6 x 10-5 2.5 s 10-3 4.0 a 102 7.5 a 101 7.5 a 101 1.0 a 102 Te-129 3.0 a 10-5 1.6 a 10-3 4.0 a 102 7.5 a 101 7.5 a 101 1.0 a 102 Te-131e 3.3 a 10-5 1.8 a 10-3 4.0 a 102 7.5 a 101 7.5 a 101 1.0 a 102 Te-132 6.2 a 10** 3.3 a 10-2 4,o a 102 7.2 a 101 7.5 a 101 1.0 a 102 Te-132d 6.2 a 10*' 3.3 a 10-2 4,o a go2 7.5 a 101 7.5 a 101 1.0 a 102 1-130 1.1 a 10-4
| |
| * 9 a 10-3
| |
| .. 1.5 a 101 5.0 a 100 5.0 x 100 4,o , 101 1-131 8.0 x 10-2 4.3 a 100 1.5 a 101 5.0 a 101 5.0 a 100 4.0 a 101 1-132 1.8 a 10-3 9.7 a 10-2 1.5 a 101 5.0 a 100 5.0 a 100 4.0 a 101 1-133 3.7 a 10-2 2.0 a 100 g,$ a got 5.0 a 100 $,o a 100 4.0 a 101 1-135 4.3 a 10-3 2.3 a 10~1 1.5 a 101 5.0 a 100 5.0 a 100 4.0 a 101 Cs-134 2.8 a 10-2 1.5 a 100 2.0 a 103 1.0 s 102 1.0 a 102 5.0 a 102 Co-136 6.9 a 10-3 3.7 a 10-1 2.0 a 103 1.0 a 102 1.0 a 102 5.0 a 102 C3-137 3.5 a 10-2 g,9 , goo 2.0 a 103 1.0 a 102 1.0 a 102 5.0 m 102 Np-239 2.3 a 10-5 1.2 a 10-3 1.0 a 101 4.0 a 102 4.0 a 102 3,o a 192 avalues based on 1-unit operation.
| |
| t 5.2-10
| |
| | |
| 4 i
| |
| h Braidwood ER-OLS AMENOMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 5.6 OTHER EFFECTS
| |
| , - 5.6.1 Introduction
| |
| - This section. describes the actual and predicted noise effects of 1
| |
| - the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station -- Units 1 & 2 (Braidwood 4 Station) during plant operation. All other effects of operation are discussed in other sections sections of Chapter 5.
| |
| l' 5.6.2 Approach Noise due to the operation of Braidwood Station was predicted at
| |
| : four locations identified in Figure 5.6-1 as Points 1 through 4.
| |
| Points 1, 2, and 3 were selected because plant operation noise will i
| |
| ] be relative maximums for offsite residential areas and because these locations are the same as ambient measurement points A, B, and C, shown in Figure 2.7-1. Point 4 was selected to assess-maxi-mum of fsite noise due to the operation of the screen house. Actual 1 noise measurements were taken at Point 4 in 1981 shortly after the 1 screen house had become operational.
| |
| The noise sources (equipment) considered in predicting continuous
| |
| ()
| |
| ' plant operation noise were the main power transformers, system auxiliary transformers, unit auxiliary transformers, screen-house l
| |
| transformers, auxiliary building ventilation supply and exhuast
| |
| ! fans, and screen-house ventilation supply fans. Experience shows 1
| |
| that these are the major sources of continuous exterior noise for this type of station. Intermittent noise due to the operation of L unsilenced main-steam power-operated relief valves was also pre-i dicted.
| |
| ! 5.6.3 Procedures 1
| |
| i Maximum expected noise level data for the major exterior sources i
| |
| identified in Subsection 5.6.2 were established based on published prediction' schemes and manufacturers' information. Noise data for transformers was obtained-from the manufacturer and from the National Electrical Manufacturers Association's Standards for Transformers, TRl-1972, Section 0.06 (1972). Ventilation-fan noise
| |
| ; level predictions were based on a prediction technique by J. B.
| |
| ! Graham (1975), and used fan operation parameters obtained from
| |
| . station design requirements. Power-operated relief valve noise was predicted using a technique developed by Riley-Beaird (no date).
| |
| The noise levels for each source were extrapolated to the various prediction points, using standard prediction techniques that ac-count ~for wave divergence and excess attenuation due to atmospheric absorption, directivity, shielding, and ground effects. The fol-()
| |
| lowing values were used to account for attenuation due to atmos- 3 pheric. absorption: j i
| |
| l 5.6-1
| |
| ..-,---..v ~,.-,,.,------,-,,.-,--,r-~,...,,,----,-,-tv.,,-e,-c.,%-w.m,..--%-, .,-,-~w.,,...m ,,.,-.,,,-,n,-, e,,...w.e,-,,,w-..+
| |
| | |
| l Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 Octave Band Center Attenuation Frequency (Hz) (dB/1000 ft) 63 0 125 0 500 0.7 1000 1.4 2000 3.0 4000 7.7 8000 14.4 These values are based on " Standard Day" conditions (i.e.; 590F, 70% R.H., negligible wind velocity) and were taken from Society of Automotive Engineers, 1975, " Standard Values of Atmospheric Absorp-tion as a Function of Temperature and Humidity," ARP 866A.
| |
| Credit was taken for the directivity of the supply and exhuast fans based on information supplied by Koppers Company, Inc. (1963),
| |
| " Directivity Index," Drawing D-98033. Credit for directivity of 1 the mechanical draft cooling towers was not taken separately since sound level predictions were based on the vendor's proposal data, which include the ef fects of directivity. ggg Shielding or barrier attenuation was accounted for where applicable and was based on the work of Z. Maekawa (1968), " Noise Reduction by Screens," Applied Acoustics, Vol. 1, pp. 157-173.
| |
| Because .of the variability of ground conditions from season to season, attenuation due to ground effects was considered neglib-ible, and therefore, was not taken into effect in estimating excess noise attenuation.
| |
| The resulting octave-band sound pressurt levels from each continu-aus source were then combined to give the resultant overall plant operation noise level at each location. Table 5.6-1 summarizes the predicted levels. Table 5.6-2 summarizes the predicted A-weighted noise levels at each prediction point resulting from relief valve operation.
| |
| Actual field measurements at Point 4 were taken in 1981. The noise levels during normal screen house operation can be found in Table 5.6-1.
| |
| 5.6.4 NOISE EFFECTS 5.6.4.1 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency To assess the possible ef fects of noise due to normal continuous operation of the Braidwood Station, the predicted levels were g
| |
| 5.6-2
| |
| | |
| ,A, .
| |
| \/ Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 compared to applicable state of Illinois noise pollution control regulations. Since the predicted points are located near existing residences, station noise at these points is regulated by Rule 203 (Sound Emitted to Class-A Land During Nighttime Hours.) The com-parisons of predicted levels with Rule 203, as shown in Figures 5.6-2 through 5.6-5, indicated that the calculated station opera-tion noise levels.at all prediction points meet the Illinois regu-lations.
| |
| 5.6.4.2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency A second method used to assess the possible effects of normal oper-ation of Braidwood Station was to determine how the predicted plant operation noise levels compared with the levels of environmental noise identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.
| |
| EPA) as requisite to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety.
| |
| This comparison, summarized in Table 5.6-3, shows that the pre-dicted level at each point meets the requisite level, Ldn 1 55 dB, applicable to outdoor levels in residential areas.
| |
| .(w 5.6.4.3 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A comparison of predicted noise due to normal plant operation with the Department of Housing and Urbas Development (HUD) critiera described in Subsection 2.7.3.3 (Ldn 65 dBA) is shown in Table 5.6-4. This comparison shows that predicted levels at all loca- $
| |
| tions meet the HUD criteria.
| |
| 5.6.4.4 Preoperational Ambient Levels To permit comparison of predicted plant operation noise with preop-erational abmient noise at the plant site, levels measured at points A, B, and C (see Subsection 5.6.2) are shown in Tables 5.6-3 and 5.6-4. These tables indicate that although levels at points near the Braidwood Station property line will be increased due to station operation, the predicted levels are below all applicable regulations and guidelines. Ambient noise levels measured in the nearest communities (see Subsection 2.7.1), however, are not ex-pected to be signficantly affected by plant operation.
| |
| 5.6.5 Conclusion The predicted station operatior, noise levels at property line points near existing residences meet state of Illinois regulations and federal guidelines for noise emitted to residential receivers.
| |
| () The actual station operation noise levels are expected to be lower 5.6-3
| |
| | |
| O than those presented in this Environmental Report because all pre-dictions were based on the maximum expected equipment noise. The noise impact due to normal operation of the Braidwood Station is
| |
| , therefore expected to be small. ,
| |
| I i
| |
| i t
| |
| {
| |
| 1 l
| |
| v I
| |
| r k
| |
| ?
| |
| l i
| |
| p i
| |
| )
| |
| I 5.6-3a I
| |
| i i
| |
| )
| |
| , , , _ ~ . _ - - _ , , . , _ - - - _ , _ . ~ - - _ . - _ - _ _ _ _ . . - - - , , _ _ _ _ - - , , , , - , , _ , _ - . . , . . . _ _ _ . , - - - , , . . . - - . _ - - . . _ - - _ - .
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 5.6-1 PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS DUE TO NORMAL CONTIN 0US OPERATION OCTAVE BAND CENTER PREQUENCIES (Hz)
| |
| LOCATION dBA 63 125 250 500 1K 2K 4K 8K 1 36 43 48 40 31 20 6 -- --
| |
| 2 49 51 59 53 47 38 25 13 --
| |
| 3 49 57 62 53 44 31 15 -- --
| |
| 4* 44 47 44 41 43 39 36 25 17 1 O
| |
| * NOTE: Noise levels for location 4 are actual nighttime measure-ments taken in 1981 in accordance w_th State of Illinois 1 Noise Regulations, Chapter 8, Part 2, Rule 203.
| |
| l l
| |
| 5.6-4
| |
| | |
| -+JJ. - A s
| |
| i, Braidwood ER-Ot.S r
| |
| t TABLE 5.6-2 PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS DUE TO RELIEF VALVE OPERATION LOCATION SOUND LEVEL (dBa)
| |
| I' 1 94 l
| |
| 2 96-3 91 I
| |
| 4 48 l
| |
| i O 1
| |
| i 1
| |
| i j
| |
| i r
| |
| i 5.6-5 l
| |
| 4 4
| |
| ann--,- .-+-,-n,,~,,n,.--n-_,c,a.,,-,na,a.,_,..,- _.n_.,--__ ,__ - - _ _
| |
| | |
| 1 Braidwood ER-OLS AMENOMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 5.6-3 COMPARISON OF PREDICTED AND MEASURED CONTINUQUS NOISE LEVELS WITH U.S. EPA GUIDELINES NOISE DUE TO AMBIENT NOISE PLANT OPERATION U.S. EPA LOCATION (Measured Level) (Predicted Level) GUIDELINE 1 Lnd a = 43.5 Ldn = 42 Ln d 55 2 Ldn = 5 2.1 Ldn = 55 Ln d 55 3 Ldn = 4 2.1 Ldn = 55 Ln d 55 4 Ldn = 44.2 Ld n = 51.4* Ln d 55 1 O
| |
| * NOTE: The measured level at location 4 is an actual field measure '
| |
| ment taken in 1981 with the river screen house in normal 1 operation, i.e. two of the three circulating water make up pumps operating.
| |
| Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA 1974).
| |
| aThe Ld n or day-night sound level represents the Leq with a 10 db nighttime penalty (see Subsection 2.7.2).
| |
| 5.6-6 i
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 5.6-4 COMPARISON OF PREDICTED AND MEASURED CONTIN 0US NOISE LEVELS WITH HUD GUIDELINES NOISE DUE TO AMBIENT NOISE PLANT OPERATION HUD LOCATION (Measured Level Ldn) (Predicted Level) GUIDELINE 1 43.1 Ldn = 42 Ld n , 65 1
| |
| 2 52.1 Ldn = 55 Ln d 65
| |
| > 42.1 Ldn = 55 Ldn 65 4 44.2 Ldn = 51.4* Ldn 65 O
| |
| * NOTE: The measured level at Location 4 is an actual field measure-ment taken in 1981 with the river screen house in normal 1 operation, i.e. , two of the three circulating water make up i, pumps operating.
| |
| l Source: Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD 1979). 1 5.6-7 O
| |
| 'I
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 70 -
| |
| s (O
| |
| J N N
| |
| N N
| |
| N 60 - \
| |
| g
| |
| \
| |
| j = \
| |
| g \
| |
| o N N ILLIN0IS RULE 203 N
| |
| " 50 N
| |
| 8 s e
| |
| o N
| |
| 2 N
| |
| : w \
| |
| \
| |
| ' e sN i ACTUAL NOISE LEVELS
| |
| ; - 40 -
| |
| g%
| |
| g N 4
| |
| $ N a N i j N-___
| |
| ! $ 30 -
| |
| O m E
| |
| ; 8 I
| |
| S g 20 -
| |
| I G
| |
| 8 10 -
| |
| 4 I I I I I i i i 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 0CTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCIES IN HZ (CPS) j BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 1 UNITS I & 2 ENVIRONM NTAL REPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE 1
| |
| : FIGURE 5.6-5 NOISE LEVELS AT POINT 4
| |
| | |
| 'O N'
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 5.8 DECOMMISSIONING AND DISMANTLING The Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 & 2 (Braidwood Station) is designed for an operating life of at least 40 years.
| |
| Decommissioning of this facility, therefore, is not expected to occur before the year 2025 and probably will not c; cur until much later. It is anticipated that a signficant body rf technology related to the decommissionin] of nuclear power stations will have been developed before these reactors are decommissioned. Indeed, the decommissioning of nuclear reactor facilities is already a relatively well developed technology (Smith et al, 1978). The Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) has not yet developed detailed plans for the decommissioning of the Braidwood reactors in order to retain maximum flexibility to apply future technology when needed.
| |
| - Decommissioning is de fined, for a nuclear facility, as the measures taken at the end of the facility's operating life to assure the continued protection of the public from any residual radioactivity or other potential hazards present in the facility. Three basic approaches to decommissioning have been considered:
| |
| : a. Immediate Dismantlement - Radioactive
| |
| / materials are removed and the station is disassembled and decontaminated during the 4-year period following final cessation of 1 power production operations. Upon comple-tion, the property is released for unre-stricted used.
| |
| : b. Safe Storage with Deferred Dismantlement -
| |
| . Radioactive materials and contaminated areas are secured and structures and
| |
| , equipment are maintained as necessary to assure the protection of the public from
| |
| ! the residual radioactivity. During the period of Safe Storage, the facility re-mains limited to nuclear uses. Dismantle-ment is deferred until the radioactivity within the station has decayed to lower levels. Upon completion of dismantlement, the property is released for unrestricted use.
| |
| : c. Entombment - Another alternative to imme- '
| |
| diate dismantlement is entombment--the ,
| |
| encasement of all radioactive meterials remaining at the site of the power plant,
| |
| {} in concrete or other structural material 5.8-1 L
| |
| . _ _ . - __ _ m, _ . _ . - . , _ _ _ . - _-.-.--__ __ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 19'3 that is sufficiently strong and structur-ally long-lived to ensure retention of the radioactivity until it has decayed to
| |
| ' levels that permit unco.7ditional release of the site.
| |
| Deferred dismantlement, as used here, is a generic term that in-cludes whatever actions are required at some future time to accom-plish termination of the facility's nuclear license and the release of the property for unrestricted use. These actions can range from radiation surveys that show that the residual radioactivity has decayed to releasable levels to disassembly and removal of radioac-tive material.
| |
| A broad span of methods is possible under Safe Storage. These methods range from minimal removal and fixation of residual radio-activity, with maintenance and surveillance using either custodial (layaway) or passive (mothballing) protection systems, to extensive cleanup and decontamination with hardened (temporary entombment) passive protection of highly radioactive areas using limited sur-veillance and continuing maintenance programs. Each method encom-passed within Safe Storage requires some level of continuing care during the holding period, which may vary in length from a few years to about a hundred years. Each method ends with the deferred 1 dismantlement of the facility and the termination of the license for radioactive materials, thus permitting the unrestricted use of the property.
| |
| The entombment scenario considered is limited to entombment of the lower portion of the containment building, either with the reactor vessel internals removal or with the internals remaining in-place.
| |
| The rest of the plant is dismantled and relased for unrestricted use. The entombment structure is used as a repository for most of the contaminated material removed during the dismantlement of the balance of the plant. The operations required for entombment in-clude, basically, chemical decontamination where necessary, and storage, in the containment building below the operating floor level, of as much as possible of the contaminated equipment and material located elsewere in the power plant. A continuous slab of concrete is then poured above the operating floor level in the montainment building, and all wall penetrations below the floor level are sealed.
| |
| The definitions and descriptions of these specific alternatives can &
| |
| be found in Smith et al. (1978) and in its August 1979 AddenJum W (Smith and Polentz 1979). It is anticipated that future decommis -
| |
| sioning technology will retain these procedures and that various 5.8-2
| |
| | |
| I i
| |
| l Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 plant systems and components will utilize different methods of decontamination for economic reasons.
| |
| The' cost estimates for these three primary decommissioning alterna- i tives are shown in Table 5.8-1. These cost estimates have been derived from information available in Smith et al. (1978) and other documents. Unlike the estimates made in Smith et. al. (1978), a cost for deferred dismantlement and deferred demolition in the entombment cost estimate has been included.
| |
| ()
| |
| 4 i
| |
| l l O
| |
| 5.8-3 i
| |
| | |
| O
| |
| )
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 I FEBRUARY 1983 Table 5.8-1 ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS OF THE PRIMARY DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES FOR EACH OF THE BRAIDWOOD STATION UNITS Per Unit Cost in Millions of 1983 Dollars Immediate Dismantlement 47.6 1 Safe Storage and deferred dismantlement with 30 year storage 61.0 50 year storage 54.9 100 year storage 60.4 Entombment with deferred dismantlement (100 year storage) g internals remain 70.4 internals removed 77.0 0
| |
| 5.8-4
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS
| |
| (~h U CHAPTER 6.0 - EFFLUENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS AND MONITORING PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 6.1 APPLICANT'S PREOPERATIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM _S 6.1-1 6.1.1 Surface Waters 6.1-1 6.1.1.1 Physical and Chemical Parameters 6.1-2 6.1.1.1.1 Baseline Program 6.1-2 6.1.1.1.2 Construction Stage Monitoring Program 6.1-3 6.1.1.2 Ecological Parameters 6.1-4 6.1.1.2.1 Baseline Program 6.1-4 6.1.1.2.2 Construction Stage Monitoring Program 6.1-11 6.1.2 Groundwater 6.1-17 6.1.2.1 Physical and Chemical Parameters 6.1-17 6.1.2.2 Models 6.1-18 6.1.3 Air 6.1-18 6.1.3.1 Meterology 6.1-18 6.1.3.1.1 Instrumentation 6.1-19 6.1.3.1.2 Equipment Maintenanca and Calibration Procedures 6.1-20 6.1.3.1.3 Data Analysis Procedures 6.1-22
| |
| {~"/3 6.1.3.1.4 Regional Data Sources 6.1-23 6.1.3.2 Models 6.1-23 6.1.3.2.1 Short-Term ( Accident) Diffusion Estimates 6.1-23 6.1.3.2.2 Long-Term (Routine) Diffusion Estimates 6.1-25 6.1.3.2.2.1 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Direction, Wind Speed and Stability 6.1-26 6.1.3.2.2.2 Effective Release Height 6.1-29 6.1.3.2.2.3 Annual Average Atmospheric Dilution Factor 6.1-29 6.1.4 Land 6.1-31 6.1.4.1 Geology and Soils 6.1-31 6.1.4.1.1 Office Studies 6.1-31 6.1.4.1.2 Field Studies 6.1-31 6.1.4.1.3 Laboratory Studies 6.1-32 6.1.4.2 Land Use and Demographic Surveys 6.1-33 6.1.4.2.1 Land Use Surveys 6.1-33 6.1.4.2.2 Demographic Surveys 6.1-33 6.1.4.3 Ecological Parameters 6.1-35 6.1.4.3.1 Materials and Methods for 1972 through 1973 Terrestrial Baseline Survey 6.1-35 6.1.4.3.1.1 Vegetation Sampling 6.1-35 6.1.4.3.1.2 Animal Sampling 6.1-36 6.1.4.3.2 Materials and Methods for 1974 through 1975 Terrestrial Baseline Survey 6.1-37 6.1.4.3.2.1 Vegetation Sampling 6.1-37 6.1.4.3.2.1.1 Established Study Areas 6.1-38 Os 6.1-38 6.1.4.3.2.1.2 New Study Areas 6.0-i
| |
| | |
| m Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 lll TABLE OF CONTENTS (Coo;'d)
| |
| PAGE 6.1.4.3.2.1.3 Marsh-Pond Study Areas 6.1-40 6.1.4.3.2.2 Animal Sampling 6.1-41 6.1.4.3.2.2.1 Established Study Areas 6.1-41 6.1.4.3.2.2.2 New Study Areas 6.1-42 6.1.4.3.2.2.3 Marsh-Pond Study Areas 6.1-43 6.1.4.3.3 Methods for 1979 through 1982 Terres-trial Monitoring Programs 6.1-44 6.1.5 Radiological Monitoring 6.1-44a 6.1.5.1 Sampling Media, Locations and Frequency 6.1-44a 6.1.5.2 Data Analysis, Analytical Sensitivity, and Data Presentation 6.1-45 6.1.5.2.1 Air Samples 6.1-45 6.1.5.2.2 Water Samples 6.1-46 6.1.5.2.3 Sediment 6.1-46 6.1.5.2.4 Fish 6.1-46 6.1.5.2.5 Milk 6.1-46 6.1.5.2.6 Vegetation 6.1-47 6.1.5.2.7 External Gamma Exposure 6.1-47 6.1.5.3 Program Statistical Sensitivity 6.1-47 6.1.5.4 Background Radiological Characteristics 6.1.5.4.1 General 6.1-48 6.1-48 lll 6.1.5.4.2 Radioactivity in Air 6.1-49 6.1.5.4.3 External Gamma Radiation 6.1-49 6.1.5.4.4 Radioactivity in the Aquatic Environment 6.1-49 6.1.5.4.5 Radioactivity in Terrestrial Products 6.1-50 6.1.5.5 Summary 6.1-50 6.2 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED OPERATIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM 6.2-1 6.2.1 Aquatic Monitoring Program 6.2-1 6.2.1.1 Kankakee River and Horse Creek 6.2-1 6.2.1.1.1 Biological Monitoring 6.2-1 6.2.1.1.2 Temperature 6.2-3 6.2.1.1.3 Water Chemistry 6.2-3 6.2.2 Terrestrial Monitoring Program 6.2-3 6.2.3 Radiological Monitoring Program 6.2-3 6.2.4 Meteorological Monitoring Program 6.2-3 6.3 RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT AND MONITORING PROGRAMS 6.3-1 6.3.1 Illinois Department of Conservation Electroshocking Program 6.3-1 6.3.2 1111nois Department of Public Health 6.3-2 6.4 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL O
| |
| MONITORING DATA 6.4-1 6.0-11
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS O
| |
| where:
| |
| p TN = total number of trap nights, C = number of captures, and I- = trap night index.
| |
| Species identification, vigor, sex, and weight estimates were recorded, and relative densities were calculated. Surveys for mammals not included in the other studies were conducted during walking surveys of the three new .Tansect areas (A, B, and C) .
| |
| Identifications were made from actual observation of a species or from tracks, scats, dens, and other signs. The relative abundance of each was estimated.
| |
| Birds were observed seasonally during walking surveys of transects in the three study areas, with special attention given to species present during spring and fall migration periods.
| |
| Identifications were made by observing individuals and recognizing calls. Relative abundance, habitat adequacy for waterfowl, and seasonal fluctuations were estimated for
| |
| ! individual species.
| |
| Belative use of the new areas was compared with the use of the O areas already studied, and the new food chain relationships were incorporated into the generalized food web established for the Braidwood Station site.
| |
| 6.1.4.3.2.2.3 Marsh-Pond Study Areas concentrated herpetofauna studies were carried out on marsh-pond sections of Areas 2,.3, 6, and 9. A variety of methods were used to survey and census herpetofauna. On all trips through study areas, the species observed were recorded.
| |
| In order to quantify results for certain species (particularly lizards) , surveys were made on each study site during the June through September trips in 1974. The type and number of each species seen were recorded together with the distance walked (as measured by pedometer) on each study site.
| |
| Traps of various types were also used to quantify results. Can traps, large juice cans buried in the ground beneath a rock with the opening at surface level, were buried on four study sites for i lizards and insects. Can traps were buried on Areas 3 and 9 in i
| |
| June 1974 and on Areas 2 and 6 in July 1974. Baited hoop traps and trammel nets were set in study lakes and ponds for aquatic turtles.
| |
| Collected specimens were routinely weighed and measured. Small species were weighed on a triple beam balance, and larger species l
| |
| i were weighed by means of a spring scale that weighed to the nearest 0.5 kilogram. The length of species other than turtles 6.1-43 ;
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 lll was measured from snout to vent with vernier calipers for turtles, length was expressed as the length of carapace and/ar length of the plastron.
| |
| Several turtles were radio tagged and located during several survey periods. Birds within sight of marsh-pond areas were observed and recorded, and comparative presence of waterfowl and habitat use by waterfowl were noted. Identifications were made through direct observation and animal calls.
| |
| Insect abundance and availability as a food source for reptiles, fish, and birds were assassed in the marsh-pond areas nearer the Braidwood Station during summer surveys, using insect nets, light traps, and can traps.
| |
| 6.1.4.3.3 Methods for 1979 through 1982 Terrestrial Monitoring Pyagram This program involves the analysis of low and high level false color infrared aerial photographs (Cibachrome prints). The aerial photographs cover about 13 square miles in and around Braidwood site which is sufficient to document land usage modifications re-sulting from construction activities. ggg The photographs are examined for dead or dying foliage caused by injury or disease which is distinguishable from normal foliage on the basis of signature differences in the photographs. Also, soil conditions which adversely affect vegetation are also discernible.
| |
| Once the photographs are analyzed a field examination is made of suspected vegetation by a plant pathologist.
| |
| 1 l The 1979 and 1980 surveys were performed before the filling of the Braidwood cooling pond. The 1981 and 1982 surveys were performed after pond filling. The study concentrated on the area in and around the cooling pond to determine effects, if any, caused by lake fill.
| |
| The dates pertaini.ig to the taking of the aerial photographs and the subsequent field examinations are listed below:
| |
| Photographs Field Examination Seotember A. 1979 September 28-30, 1979 July 17, 1980 September 10, 1980 July 10, 1981 August 27, 1981 July 23, 1982 August 31, 1982 6.1.44
| |
| | |
| w r
| |
| () Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1:
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 6.1.5' Radiological Monitoring The preoperational radiological monitoring program planned for the Braidwood Station was: described in the. Environmental. Report - Co'n-struction Permit Stage (ER-CPS). The monitoring program currently planned incorporates some changes in sample coll'ection and analysis that were made-to obtain more useful data. .The area to be moni-tored is essentially the same as that described in the ER-CPS (see
| |
| -ER-CPS Subsection 6.1.5).
| |
| CEto plans to start its preoperational radiological monitoring !
| |
| program at least 18 months before fuel loading date. . The.preopera-tional monitoring program will provide measurements of natural 1 background and other radiation sources, such as fallout, that are external to Braidwood Station. This program will continue until <
| |
| the. plant loads nuclear fuel and-the operational-phase monitoring program begins. Details of the proposed monitoring program are discussed in this subsection.
| |
| 6.1.5.1 Sampling Media, Locations, and Frequency Table 6.1-10 presents the preoperational' radiological sampling program contemplated for use at the Braidwood Station. The media
| |
| ~
| |
| Air samp-to_be sampled include the most important dose pathways.
| |
| ling stations and surface and well water sampling Air sites that sampling may sites be were in the program are shown in Figure 6.1-7.
| |
| selected on the basis of population and site meteorological condi-tions. Environmental samples will be collected at these locations with the frequencies specified'in the technical specifications.
| |
| 6.1.44a
| |
| | |
| l Braidwood ER-OLS I
| |
| Data Analysis. Analytical Sensitivity. and Data O 6.1.5.2 Presentation The environmental samples will be analyzed by radiochemical methods similar to the procedures of the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Health and Safety Laboratory (Harley 1972) a nd the U. S. Public Health Service (1967) . Ercept where otherwise noted, a germanium-lithium (GeLi) system will be used to make all gamma spectral analyses. These methods achieve the analytical sensitivities listed in Table 6.1-11.
| |
| For most sample media, variations in radioactivity levels or concentrations from month to month or from year to year are not expected to be caused solely by random processes. That is, they will not be describable by a normal distribution function.
| |
| Accordingly, for these long-term values it would not be useful to calculate the standard deviation in the routine manner. Gross teta measurement of air samples, for example, are affected primarily by the degree of weapons testing undertaken during, or just before, the sampling period, and by stratospheric radioactivity from past weapons tests. Increases may be due to recent tests, therefore, and analysis of 1 year's data for a standard deviation may produce an estimate of the variation that is not representative of any other year.
| |
| Mean values and standard deviations are, however, appropriate for any set of samples taken at the same locations over identical O time periods. For this reason, each single set of analyses will te reported as a mean with a
| |
| * 2 standard error.
| |
| Analytical procedures specific to the samples collected are described in the following subsections.
| |
| 6.1.5.2.1 Air Samples The gross beta content of particles filtered from a measured volume of air will be determined weekly by " low level" counting of the filters. When a gamma scan is required by the specifica-tions, the filters will be composited for analyses on a GeLi detector eyetem.
| |
| Charcoal cartridges exposed for 2-week periods at air sampling !
| |
| I stations will be analyzed for I-131. An I-131 measurement on these samples will usually be made by gamma counting with a sodium iodide (t hallium-activated) crystal and a single-channel pulse height spectrometer.
| |
| For data presentation, the weekly gross beta results will be averaged quarterly for each monitoring station. The gamma spectra observed on quarterly composites of air samples will be examined for specific radionuclides. It is expected that the radionuclide composition will vary from year to year if atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons continues.
| |
| O 6.1-45
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 6.1.5.2.2 Water Samples
| |
| ~
| |
| Gross beta or gamma spectral analyses of surface, well, or precipi-tation water samples will be performed by evaporating a measured aliquot of the sample, digesting, and planchetting of the processed sample, and subjecting it to a radiometric assay. Tritium analysis will be performed on water samples to a sensitivity of 200 pCi/
| |
| liter by isotopic enrichment and liquid scintillation counting.
| |
| Strontium-89 and -90 analyses will be performed on the samples by standard radiochemical procedures followed by low-level beta count-ing of total radiostrontium plus yttrium-90. Sr-89 will then be determined by taking the difference between total strontium (repre-sented by the Sr-89 plus Sr-90 analysis) and Sr-90, computed from the Y-90 analysis.
| |
| 6.1.5.2.3 Sediment After being dried in an oven, sediment samples will be analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. Much smaller portions will be analyzed for their gross beta content.
| |
| 6.1.5.2.4 Fish Fish and other samples of aquatic life will be analyzed for gross beta, Sr-89, Sr-90, and gamma-emitting radionuclide content accord-ing to the procedures used by the U.S. Public Health Service (1967 or Harley (1972).
| |
| 6.1.5.2.5 Milk During the time cows are in pasture, May through October, samples l1 of fresh milk will be analyzed for radiciodine (as I-131) immedi-ately upon receipt of the samples in the laboratory. This method provides a sensitivity of 0.5 pCi/ liter with an overall error of analysis of 1 25%. During the rest of the year, I-131 will be determined by gamma spectal analysis. Other gammaemitting radio-nuclides will be determined by gamma spectral analysis.
| |
| Strontium-89 and-90 analyses will be made with standard radiochemi-cal techniques followed by beta counting.
| |
| The principal natural radionuclide in milk is potassium-40. Fis-sion-product nuclides that may be detected are cesium-137 by gamma spectrometry, I-131 by cation exchange-gamma spectroscopy analysis, and Sr-90 by radiochemical analysis. The mean + 20 value of each nuclide will be noted. These measurements may change slightly with time, and the values observed in any one year are not expected to be identical with those of the following year.
| |
| will indicate the typical range of values.
| |
| The measurements In the absence of re-g cent weapons tests, no I-131 in milk is expected to occur.
| |
| 6.1-46
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS-b.
| |
| u TABLE 6.1-9 DESCRIPTION OF BRAIDWOOD SUMMER BASELINE TERRESTRIAL SURVEY TRANSECTS 1972-1973 TRAN-SECT AREA LENGTH NUMBER DESCRIPTION ' SAMPLE DESCRIPTION _1ft)
| |
| ~1 . Fallow Field Veg. point intercept 450 Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 Birds-qualitative 450 Insects and Herpetofauna-qual. 450 2 Recently Veg. point intercept 1000 Strip-mined Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 Birds qualitative 1000 Insects and Herpetofauna qual. 1000 3- ' Strip-mined Veg. point intercept, fixed radius plot 735 in 1940's Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 Birds-qualitative 735 Insects and Herpetofauna qual. 735 4 Uncultivated Veg.-point intercept, fixed radius plot 1000 Woodlands Mam.-10 stations , 2 nights 500 and Soybean Birds qualitative 1000 Fields Insects and Herpetofauna qual. 1000 5 Strip-mined Veg. point intercept 1230 in 1950's Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 (offsite Birds qualitative 1230 3
| |
| area) Insects and Herpetofauna-qual. 1230 6 7- to 10-year- Veg. point intercept 973 old Strip- Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 mined area Birds qualitative 973 Insects and Herpetofauna qual. 973 7 Cultivated Veg. qualitative 500 Corn and Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 Bean Fields Birds qualitative 500 Insects and Herpetofaun.a-qual. 500 8 Uncultivated Veg. point intercept, fixed radius plot 945 Woodlands Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 Birds qualitative 945 Insects and Herpetofauna qual. 945 9 Strip-mined Veg. point intercept, fixed radius plot 1000 in 1940's Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 Birds qualitative 1000
| |
| . Insects and Herpetofauna-qual. 1000 10 'Marshland Veg. point intercept 850 (offsite Mam.-10 stations, 2 nights 500 area) Birds qualitative 850 Insects and Herpetofauna qual. 850 1
| |
| I 6.1-59 i
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 O;
| |
| TABLE 6.1-10 PRE 0rttATIONAL RADiothCICAL SAMPLING PROCRAM TTFE AND FREQUENCY FREQUENCT SAMPLE MEDIA COLLECTION SITES OF ANALYS!Sab 0F COLLECTIO4 Airborne Particulate traldwood, Custer Park, Crose Seta - W Weekly Filter County Line Road, Esses, St-89, tr Q Comp.
| |
| Cardner, and Codley Comme Spec. - Q Comp.
| |
| Cha rcoal Same se for Airborne 1-131 Every 2 weeke Cartridge Particulate Filter Sites begionLng 3 months before fuel loading Canuma Radiation Same as for Airborne Tth Qua rterly
| |
| . Particulate Filter Sites Surface WaterC Downstress at Sampling St-89, St Q Comp. Weekly Station S Casmaa Spec. - M Comp.
| |
| Cross Seta = W Trittus - Q Comp.
| |
| Intake /Discha rge 1/D Fipes if pumping; if Crose Beta - W Weekly Pipest not pumping, at Samp!!ng Sr-89, Sr M Comp.
| |
| Stations 3 and 4 Tritive - M Comp.
| |
| Games spec. - E Comp.
| |
| W ecipitation Two nearby Dalries Camma spec. - Q Comp. Monthly Sr-89, Sr Q Comp.
| |
| Cross Beta - M Tritium - Q Comp.
| |
| Well Water Nearest Well Camma Spec. Quarterly
| |
| , (ofTsite) 3r-89, Sr-90 Cross teta Tritive )
| |
| vegetables Fares within 10 miles Cross Seta As avellable S4-89, Sr-90 a t ha rve s t time Gamma Spec.
| |
| 1-131 (leafy vegetable)
| |
| Cattle Feed Two nearby Dalries Cross Sata Quarterly and Grase Sr-89, Sr-90 Cra s s: May-october 1 Camme Spec. Feed November, December Milk Two nearby Deiries Camma Spec, Monthly St-89, St M l-131 (Pasture Season)
| |
| Sediment Downstreme at Sampling Cross seta 3 times a year Aquatic Flante c Station 5, Upstream at Caama spec. Lf available Sampling Station 1 Fishe Sampling Statlon S Grosa seta 3 times a year Caumma Spec.
| |
| Sr-89, St-90 att frequency of analysis is not given, it is the same se f requency of cellection.
| |
| b Frequency of analysie key: W = Weekly; M = Monthly; Q = Quarterly; comp. = Composite.
| |
| j cSee Figure 6.1-2 for sampling locations.
| |
| I l
| |
| O 6e1-60
| |
| | |
| (). Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 6.1-11 PRACTICAL LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD)
| |
| FOR STANDARD E;NIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM LLD SAMPLE MEDIA ANALYSIS (4.660) UNITS Airborne Gross Betaa 0.01- pCi/m3
| |
| " Particulate" Gamma Isotopic 0.01 pC1/m3 Sr-89,Sr-90 0.01 pCi/m3 Airborne I-131 Iodine-131 0.10 pC1/m3 Liquids Sr-89 10 pCi/ liter Sr-90 2 pCi/ liter I-131 Sb pCi/ liter Cs-134 10 pCi/ liter Cs-137 10c pCi/ liter Tritium 0.2 pC1/ml Gross Betaa
| |
| () Gamma Isotopic 5
| |
| 20 pCi/ liter /nuclide pCi/ liter Vegetation Gross Betaa 2 pCi/g wet I-131 0.03 pCi/g wet Sr-89,Sr-90 1 pCi/g wet Gamma Isotopic 0.2 pCi/g wet Soil, Sediment Gross Betaa 2 pCi/g dry Sr-89,Sr-90 1 pCi/g dry Gamma Isotopic 0.2 pCi/g dry Animal Tissue Sr-89,Sr-90 0.1 pCi/g wet I-131 - Thyroid 0.1 pCi/g wet Cs-134,137 0.1 pCi/g wet Gross Betaa 1.0 pCi/g wet Gamma Isotopic 0.2 pCi/g wet l1 aRe ferenced to Cs-137.
| |
| bO.5 pCi/ liter on milk samples collected during the pasture season.
| |
| c5.0 pCi/ liter on milk samples.
| |
| O 6.1-61 l
| |
| | |
| ErCidwood ER-OLS O
| |
| TABLE 6.1-12 EXPECTED BRAIDtf00D BACKGROUND RADIATION LEVELS BASED ON DRESDEN DATA EXPECTED LEVEL" MEDIUM ANALYSIS (Dresden Station data)
| |
| External Gamma Radiation TLD e60 mrem / year Airborne Particulate Samples " Gross Beta" 0.05 to 0.5 pCi/m3 Gamma Spectrum Be-7 Milk Gamma Spectrum Cs-137, K-40 Radiostrontrium =5 pCi/ liter Radiocesium <5 pCi/ liter Water ' Gross Beta" 5 to 35 pCi/ liter (surface and wells) 200-400 pCi/ liter Tritium Benthic Organisms, Fish, and Shellfish
| |
| * Gross Beta" 10-60 pCi/g (dry)
| |
| Sediments " Gross Beta" 10 to 20 pC1/g (dry)
| |
| Gamma Spectrum K-40, Uranium Series, Throlum Series Grass and Food Crops " Gross Beta" 20 to 50 pCi/g (dry)
| |
| Gamma spectrum K-40, occasionally Cs-137, Be-7, Nb-95 Source: Commonwealth Edison Company (1976a, 1976b).
| |
| a Underlined activities will dominate the spectrum. Others will be near the limits of detectability.
| |
| 9 6.1-62
| |
| | |
| /
| |
| h
| |
| 'N_) Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 6.4 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING UATA The preoperational radiological monitoring program for the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 and 2 will'begin at 1
| |
| -least 18 months before_ fuel loading date. When 12 months of moni-toring data, including data from a crop harvest and a complete growing season, are available, they will be submitted as a supple-ment to this Environmental Report.
| |
| ()
| |
| 1 I -
| |
| 6.4-1 t
| |
| | |
| E I
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS CHAPTER 8.0 - ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF STATION OPERATION TABLE OF CONTENTS t
| |
| PAGE l 8.0 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF STATION OPERATION 8.0-1 t l
| |
| 8.1 VALUE OF DELIVERED PRODUCTS 8.1-1 i i
| |
| 8.2 OPERATIONAL PHASE ANNUAL-STATION PROPERTY TAX I BENEFITS 8.2-1 !
| |
| 8.3 OPERATIONAL PHASE EMPLOYMENT 8.3-1 1
| |
| ?
| |
| 8.4 OPERATIONAL STAFF RELOCATION TO LAND AREA 8.4-1 ''
| |
| 8.4.1 Educational Facilities 8.4.2 Housing Availability 8.4-1 (
| |
| 8.4-2 O
| |
| (
| |
| f t
| |
| I l l
| |
| [
| |
| i I
| |
| i 1
| |
| O 8.0-1
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 h FEBRUARY 1983 CHAPTER 8.0 - ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF STATION OPERATION LIST OF TABLES NUMBER TITLE _PAGE !
| |
| 8.1-1 Estimated Total Generating Cost for Braidwood l Station Unit 1 for First 12 Months of Commercial !
| |
| Operation 8.1-2 l 8.1-2 Estimated Total Generating Cost for Braidwood Station Unit 2 for First 12 Months of Commercial Operation 8.1-3 8.1-3 Commonwealth Edison Company Revenue and Energy Sold by Class of Service for 12 Months Ended June 30, 1982 8.1-4 8.1-4 Estimated Annual Amount of Energy and Revenue Attributable to the Braidwood Station by Class 1 of Customer 8.1-5 ggg 8.1-5 Benefits from the Braidwood Station 8.1-6 8.2-1 Braidwood Station Annual Property Taxes 8.2-2 8.3-1 Braidwood Station Operating Staff 1986 Payroll Projection 8.3-2 8.3-2 Average Income for Braidwood Station Local Area 8.3-3 8.4-1 Comparison of Braidwood Station Local Area Household and Family Size with Anticipated Braidwood Station Operating Staff 8.4-3 8.0-11 g
| |
| | |
| g
| |
| ()
| |
| Braidwood Eh-OLS AMENDMENT l' FEBRUARY 1983 CHAPTER 8.0 - ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF STATION OPERATION The Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 & 2 (Braidwood Station) will create a total of 553 permanent new jobs at the sta-tion site and an estimated annual payroll of $14.6 million (in 1982 1 dollars) when the station goes commercial in 1986.
| |
| The total cultivated agricultural land to be affected by the con-struction and operation of the Braidwood Station is 270 acres. The construction of the cooling pond required the diversion of 381 acres of cultivated agricultural land. About 90% of the remaining area required for pond construction, or 2838 acres, consisted of strip-mine spoil. The total affected cultivated acreage (651 acres) is less than 0.1% of the total agricultural land in the three-county agricultural region formed by Grundy, Kankakee, and Will Counties (see Section 4.1).
| |
| Permanent new residents attracted as a result of the Braidwood Station project will be dispersed throughout the surrounding com-munities (see Section 8.4), so that there will be little effect on 7s local services. The increased tax revenue attributable to the
| |
| (_) Braidwood Station project from property taxes is estimated to be
| |
| $9.3 million in 1986 (see Section 8.2). Local taxing districts i should receive more tax dollars than required to provide the addi-tional services for the new residents.
| |
| It is not possible to determine the benefit to the local economy from the purchase of local goods and services for operation of the station. The average 1983 budget for contract payments for Common-wealth Edison's three operating nuclear stations, each with two operable units, is $17.3 million. These costs include refueling, 1 maintenance and waste disposal. The procurement of materials and services is based on a competetive bid system, and therefore no estimate can be made as to which suppliers will provide the mate-rials and service, the corresponding monetary value, or the county in which the supplier is located.
| |
| There are no historical sites located on the Braidwood site.
| |
| 1 l
| |
| l l
| |
| [ ~)
| |
| v 8.0-1
| |
| | |
| () Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 8.1 VALUE OF DELIVERED PRODUCTS Because the generating capacity of the Braidwood Station will be made available throughout the entire Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) power grid, no attempt has been made to confine the use characteristics within an imaginary radius of the site. The sta-tion's electrical output has been estimated for the composition of the entire CECO service territory.
| |
| Estimates of the total generating costs for the first year of com-mercial operation for each unit are $607 million (103 mills per kilowatthour) for Unit 1 and $455 million (77 mills per kilowatt-hour) for Unit 2 (see Tables 8.1-1 and 8.1-2) .
| |
| At a lifetime average capacity factor of 65%, the plant will pro-duce 12.75 billion kilowatthours of electricity annually with as-sociated annual revenues of $836 million under the present rate 1 schedules (see Tables 8.1-3 and 8.1-4), assuming that revenue con-tributions for classes of service for the year ending June 30, 1982, remain . constant through the life of the plant. The estimated values of various benefits from the Braidwood Station project are "
| |
| listed on Table 8.1-5. Dollar values listed in this table repre-O sent revenues for a 30-year period and indirect benefits for a 30-year period present valued to January 1, 1983 at an effective interest rate of 13% per year.
| |
| O 8.1-1 i
| |
| __ _ _ . _ _ _ , _ _ , - . . . _ ,. ______m_
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 h
| |
| TABLE 8.1-1 ESTIMATED TOTAL GENERATING COST FOR BRAIDWOOD STATION UNIT 1 FOR FIRST 12 MONTHS OF COMMERCIAL OPERATION Oollarsa Mills Per Cost Component (thousands) Kilowatthoura Fuel $ 77,175 13.11 Operating & Maintenance 39,559 6.72 Carrying Charges 471,703 80.13 Other 18,484 3.14 Total Generating Cost $606,9 21 103.10 0
| |
| Note: Values are based on commercial operation starting October, 1985.
| |
| aCosts are in 1986 dollars and are based on 60% capacity factor (generating 5,886,720 MWH per year). Cost includes carrying charges on fuel investment.
| |
| 8.1-2 0
| |
| | |
| n
| |
| - (,) Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 8.1-2 ESTIMATED TOTAL GENERATING COST FOR BRAIDWOOD STATION UNIT 2 FOR FIRST 12 MONTHS .0F COMMERCIAL OPERATION
| |
| 'Dollarsa Mills Per Cost Component (thousands)' Kilowatthoura Fuel $ 84,121 14.29 Operating & Maintenance 43,150 7.33 Carrying Charges 312,526 53.09 Other 14,717 2.50 1
| |
| Total Generating Cost $454,514 77.21 O
| |
| Note: Values are based on commercial operation starting October, 1986.
| |
| aCosts are in 1987 dollars and are based on 60% capacity factor (generating 5,886,720 MWH per year). Cost includes carrying charges on fuel investment.
| |
| 8.1-3
| |
| | |
| Table 8.1-3 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY REVENUE AND ENERGY SOLO BY CLASS OF SERVICE FOR 12 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1982 Energy Sold Revenue Revenue Amount Percentage Per KWH Class ($ in 000's) (MWH) of Total (d) to Residential 1,316,461 17,335,745 29.03 7.59 s E
| |
| .m Small Commercial & Industrial 1,359,441 18,990,773 31.81 7.16 6 Y U.
| |
| * Large Commercial & Industrial 924,955 17,660,955 29.58 5.24 Other 314,971 5,721,822 9.58 5.50 g Total 3,915,828 59,709,295 100.00 (
| |
| Il 4
| |
| a-6 O O O
| |
| | |
| ._._ . . --- - - . . - . - _ . . - - - - - . _ . . - . - . _=
| |
| 0 O O i
| |
| l 1
| |
| ! Table 8.1-4 i Estimated Annual Amount of Energy and Revenue Attributable to the Braidwood Station by Class of Customer Class of Customer Total Estimated Revenue Percentage of Energy Used Per KWH- Total Value m Type Total Energy Used (MWH) (W) (Dollars) 2 E
| |
| 03 Residential 29.03 3,702,649 7.59 281,031,059 Y
| |
| u Small Commercial & Industrial 31.81 4,057,225 7.16 290,497,310 Large Commercial & Industrial 29.58 3,772,799 5.24 197,694,668 g Other 9.58 1,221,887 5.50 67,203,785 Total 100.00 12,754,560 836,426,822.
| |
| 1 I
| |
| B
| |
| ! <g$
| |
| 1 s-I
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 h
| |
| TABLE 8.1-5 BENEF[IS FRGM THE BRAIDWOOD STATION QUANTITATIVE DIRECT BENEFITS VALUE Expected Average Annual Generation in KWH (billions) 12.75 Capacity in KW (millions) 2.24 Proportional Distribution of Electrical Energy Expected Annual Delivery (KWH) (billions)
| |
| Residential 3.70 Small Commercial and Industrial 4.06 Large Commercial and Industrial 3.77 lll Other 1.22 1
| |
| Revenues from Delivered Benefits Electrical Energy Generated (millions of dollars)a 8,347.6 INDIRECT BENEFITS Taxes (local, state, federal)
| |
| (millions of dollars)a 1,482.4 aThese dollars are for a 30-year period present valued to January'1, 1983 at an effective interest rate of 13%.
| |
| 8.1-6 O
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 8.2 OPERATIONAL PHASE ANNUAL STATION PROPERTY TAX BENEFITS The annual property tax breakdown for Braidwood Station, both for 1 1981 and projected to 1986, 'is listed in Table 8.2-1.
| |
| O i
| |
| 8.2-1 1
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDHENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 h
| |
| TABLE 8.2-1 BRAIDWOOD STATION ANNUAL PROPERTY TAXES ACTUAL ESTIMAT' TAXING UNIT 1981 TAXES 1986 ' ,
| |
| County $ 567,198 00 Forest Preserve 206,209 43,000 Reed Twp. 74, J " 121,600 1
| |
| Braidwood Fire Dist. 186,h 306,800 School Dist. U-225 3,641,o., 6,078,100 Comm. College Dist. 525 249,426 592,300 Fossil Ridge Public Library 134,908 221,200 TOTAL $5,03 9,94 2 $9,281,900 h 8.2-2 g
| |
| | |
| I[ ) Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 8.3 OPERATIONAL PHASE EMPLOYMENT During the estimated 40-year lifetime of the Braidwood Station, gains in local employment will be effected through the creation of 553 new Braidwood Station operating staff jobs. These 553 plant employees will earn a total of $14.6 million ennually in 1982 dol-4,
| |
| .lars (see Table 8.3-1). This value is based on 1982 CECO. generat-ing station payroll data.
| |
| The average income of $26,318 in 1982 for a Braidwood Station oper-
| |
| : ating staf f employee can be compared to the projected average in-come of workers in the local area around Braidwood Station (local area defined as the communities of Braidwood, Gardner, Wilmington, Godley, South Wilmington, and Coal City; see Section 9.4). Table 8.3-2 shows a 1982 projected average wage of $23,846 for local residents based upon 1970 census tract information and the Consumer Price Index for a period extending Trom 1970 to 1982. The Braid- 1 wood Station average wage, however, represents a select group of employees, whereas the local earning figures represent all wage earners, including part-time and fixed income earners.
| |
| (N
| |
| \_)
| |
| The induced new employment in the east-northeastern Illinois region is estimated to be 498 new jobs based on a local multiplier of 0.90. The local multiplier is defined as the number of service occupation employees in 1974 divided by the number of production occupation employees in the same year. It was calculated using data obtained from the Illinois Department of Business and Economic Development (1976). The total employmeric generated in the east-northeastern Illinois region, which includes Braidwood Station, is therefore estimated to be the direct employment plus the induced employment, or 1,051 new jobs.
| |
| 8.3-1
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 &
| |
| FEBRUARY 1983 W TABLE 8.3-1 BRAIDWOOD STATION OPERATING STAFF 1986 PAYROLL PROJECTION PERSONNEL GROUP PAYROLL 417 Station Employees $11,987,141 170 Management Employees -
| |
| $32,354 average 247 Bargaining Unit Employees -
| |
| $26,263 average 3 Quality Assurance Employees - 97,062
| |
| $32,354 average 3 Nuclear Safety Department Employees 97,062 llh
| |
| $32,354 average i 130 Security Force Employees -
| |
| $18,252 average 2,372,760 TOTAL PAYROLL $14,554,025 Average per Employee $ 26,318 Note: Payroll projection in 1982 dollars based on July 1982 CECO.
| |
| Generating Station data.
| |
| 8.3-2
| |
| | |
| () Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 8.3-2 AVERAGE INCOME FOR BRAIDWOOO STATION LOCAL AREA
| |
| , YEAR AVERAGE INCOME 1970 $ 9,200a 1982 $23,830h 1 O
| |
| aSource: U.S. Census information obtained from CACI Site II Program, bSource: Increase of 159% from 1970 to 1982 obtained from 1 Consumer Price Index.
| |
| d
| |
| () 8.3-3
| |
| | |
| t r
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS l , , , ,.c F . s .. . . 2. . . .,
| |
| I W dHAPTER 11.0 -
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS rea r. w .n Information on the. summary cost-benefit analysis for the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station , ,, Units 1 8 2 (Braidwood station) is presented in Table 11.0-1.~'
| |
| , , w.. >< >
| |
| . .. . :ri. t ,;vs::
| |
| e t ,
| |
| e /(e 5
| |
| .
| |
| * w i , , r T" :ti 0 . ..A
| |
| . 2_ _ .--
| |
| *I r,,< , i ); gc, 4 _ ;Oih9 If..'ai N.m. ;, n!
| |
| i
| |
| 'c- Jw : q**1 g rof t , ! 6.'' r R .* > l ?4 3; a'b l ',*13 4.* 3 iii ' v $ ~s i i ...r .
| |
| . . ., : m m. .c . 1 .u n. w
| |
| : r. . * , :%.itt', n . r.
| |
| 1 #i. (? 4 i , : m e. -
| |
| ! >< i s !
| |
| , i . .e i47 9: i. d
| |
| . i ,,' ,s' go
| |
| ; '', i - :7,
| |
| ( 1 f-1 c.., <n 6 Ty .s' h. .'lI <
| |
| + ts i e_vi i{-NriJ\] J:!! 10 (;?vrwc3 i -a. ,a tm > : ,) :-- t s hu . m., ; en t.,v e n; et -
| |
| . ci
| |
| !! , t _lq) 1% <
| |
| - i v , ;< y ri .]: e i
| |
| : v; >
| |
| t- ;1 3 .)
| |
| 51 (i' l'-
| |
| T II
| |
| '. . t : ^. 't " '.G 'i L' j'?>
| |
| 7%-
| |
| : f. ' s, - t - , -ya;<
| |
| * ''1; e ,
| |
| l f:
| |
| ' s' j e
| |
| * I n I- !. C , ,
| |
| ;9.. .
| |
| r g /
| |
| t m
| |
| r ! L.- 9 i) f 4
| |
| ! , ,) -
| |
| . s'L i +
| |
| 11.0-1
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 fiBL il.I O i 50iU.SEf bilEsi.5i5EiiiNiiiiii$ 6$ iY55Rii6uo00.SiIh0?t EU(tliR PONE 5 sfiff6#
| |
| Eon 6ifi62isG filiiNi iiiiow666 wiik is46c^iiiE6 iMikildiiiid iiiiiosikiin6&ni t00Lir M rd T'Etif Ahi161'pii48 6ap'fi6i $'13 billion i iniiikshi (50E65$ El $1YS Sf51bhis$NGi6cfEE $iss$ EE666df inhu'si permaieni fipi6y6e faf: 4 S$$$$0N$0giEN Eip6Eia1i) 0'f(Ehied iowSfd roiii $i5.6 siiiion igffEuiiufE ind sisihq'
| |
| ' l innuai i6cai iales on siaif6ni 1 h1:5EiiiissEsiisai6856f 1986 stied ihE ssdesd usti se; f
| |
| comes dienefefaf faxes (locali staie, federai) oder' 30-year pepiod ji;492.4 1 m111fon
| |
| {E865)Eltka iltfeskijdissfieenanomi; ihnusi451ue61powefSFaduiEd Righ j thdasif5al$ied is 4 CSEEEEEsiltN{5$iES uEdif pfeseni schedaissi l836 bbEpdE] 58ffli8 d5a' EfifEig6 seffobolitin' irsa miif fon snd some outlying ceniers (Jof fet; Rockfofd); ahd prf-mafily'.agficuliufalig ofi.
| |
| Ehi0d is nok:ekircpoliian iriss hNydlifl ihd dF5ld$f iindii iNd pr$sent is6d use Appfoximately 4d55 iEfes of in the ifea is p'rimariIf land hive 6ses acdaired for strip-mine spoil Qith' soTe use by the proposed 5titics cditivaisdland an'5cocifngpond; Of this acreage, about 820 scres will form the exclusien area.
| |
| Cropland and residential land in the exclusion a-ea will be changed because no crops will be grown and house and f am buildings have been rc1oved; The actual station sifectufe will occupy 130 acres. Loss 11.0-2
| |
| | |
| O i V Braidwood ER-OLS AMEN 0p(NT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 TABLE 11.0-1 SlpeURY OF Q)ST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF THE BRAIDWOOD STATION NUCLEAR POWER STATION Q)M0!TIONS AND NtESENT BRAIDWOOD WITH ASSOCIATED CHNIACTERISTICS STATION ENVIR00 MENT Q)0 LING POND of wildlife habitat is ex-pected to be small. 0)n-struction of the cooling pond requires the diversion of 704 acres of cultivated agricul-tural land. Of the remaining area required for pond con-struction, the major portion, 2313 acres, currently consist of strip-mine spoil Water: Kankakee River near Water consumed through evapor- i O site: average flow = 4116 ation and seepage loss:
| |
| O cfs approximately 57 cfs Temperature ranges: The concentration of radio, Sunuier 16.50 to 30.00C nuclides in the discharge will Spring and Fall be much less than the maximum 0.50 to 26.50C permissible concentration Winter 0.00 to 9.50C (MPC) of 10 CFR 20 t,nd will meet the design objectives of Quality is good, with little 10 CFR 50. Appendix I.
| |
| effect due to domestic and industrial discharge Thermal discharge to river is expected to be negligible and in compliance with therinal mixing zone regulations.
| |
| Chemical discharge into the Kankakee River due to opera-tion of the station is not considered significant.
| |
| The only discharge to the groundwater (approximately 5 cfs) will be associated with seepage from the cooling pond.
| |
| 11.0-2a
| |
| | |
| 4
| |
| () Braidwood ER-OLS ,
| |
| AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY .1 '83 CHAPTER 12.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVALS AND CONSULTATIONS The licenses, permits, and other approvals required by federal,
| |
| . state, and local authorities for the constructin and operation of the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station - Units 1 and 2 (Braidwood Station) are listed in Table 12.0-1. This table indicates the issuing government agency, the statutory basis of the agency's authority, the activity for which approval is required, the cate-gory of environmental impact, and the status of each permit. The table is based on the design of the Braidwood Station, the project schedule, and the statutes and regulations applicable as of December 1982. Should it become necessary in the future to apply 1 for other approvals or permits, Commonwealth Edison Company will take action.
| |
| Table 12.0-2 lists the state and local authorities contacted in connection with the Braidwood Station.
| |
| c.
| |
| O -t i
| |
| O 12.0-1
| |
| | |
| TELE 12.0-1 AUT4A!ZAT10815 REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF TE BRAIDWOOD STATION STATUS OF PERMIT CATEGDRT OF PERMIT REOLI&fD NRPOSE (DfCEMBER 1982) EWIR000(NTAL IMPACTS AEICT 0(5CRIPf!04 STATUTE AUT@RITT U.S. helear Regulatory Construction Permit Atomic Energy Act of Construct Units I & 2 Granted 12-31-75 Alr. Land. Water - CE Comunistica 1954 and Regulation 10 CFR 50 Atomic Energy kt of Operate Units 1 & 2 Summitted 12 01-78 Air. Land, bater - QE i U.S. Italear Regulatory operating Perett Crasatssion 1954 and Regulation 10 CTR 50 I
| |
| I 10 CFR 70 Possess special nuclear Granted 10-31-80 Radiological - CE U.S. Actear Regulatory Radiation Materials 10 CFR 30 saterials prior to Amendment to 1E lude Commission License operating Itcense nuclear fuel to be j g applied for 1 84. >g 9
| |
| bater - CE M Construction Permit 33 USC Section 401, 404 Construct intake and Granted 8-09-77 U.S. Army Corps of discharge structures Engineers 565 5
| |
| . Approval of 320-foot Granted 5 25-73 Land - Planning O federal Avtation Approval Civil Aeronautics Act 8 Adelaistration of 1938 as amended meteorological tower N Sections 205 and 1101 Water - CE and OE I
| |
| FwPCA Section 402 Otscharge treated plant Granted 5-19-76 O U.S. Environantal NPDES Permit i
| |
| Protection Agency easte b
| |
| Construct and teerate Granted 3-27-74 Land - Planning Illinois Comunerce Cert. of Conveniente Ill. Pubite Utilities Commission and Necessity Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. Units 1 & 2 1971. Ch. 111-213 Section 50 et see l
| |
| ACE = Construction Effect; DE = Operational Effect.
| |
| !B C
| |
| D =b (D
| |
| u O O O
| |
| | |
| +
| |
| ) i
| |
| \ g y/
| |
| TABLE 12.0-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| AUT@Ril4TIONS REQUIRED FOR CDNSTRUCTION AND OPERAT!0s OF Tif 8AAIOWOOD STAfl0E PCRMIT REQUIRED STATUS OF PERMIT CATEENtf 0F AGENCY DESCRIPTION STATUTE AUT@elTY PURPOSE (DECEMSER 1982) E4WIROISENTAL IMP _ACT3 i Illinois Commerce Cert. of Conventence Ill. Pubitc Uttittles La Salle to Bralducod to Granted 8-24-77 Land . Plannlag Cmunission and Necessity Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. East Frankfort trans. Amended 11-10-77 h-1971. O. 111-213 etssion Itne right-of- (Section 50 yranted gh.
| |
| Section 50 et ses. say 11-09-77) g e
| |
| O 111tnots Commerce Cert. of Convenience Ill. Pubite uttitties tatham-Frankfort (Line Granted 8-13-75 Land - Planning I Cemetssion and necessity Act.111. Rev. Stat. 8012) to Davis Creek (Section50 granted 1971. O . 111-213 transatssion line 2 11-76)
| |
| Section 50 et seg. right-of-way _g Illinois Commerce Cert. of Davenience 111. Public Uttittles Braidwood te Line 8012 Granted 8-17 77 Land . Planning -
| |
| Commission and Necessity Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. transmission line 1971 m.111213 right-of way Section 50 et seg.
| |
| Illinois Cosmarce Cert. of Conventence Ill. Public Uttittles Davis Creek-Crete Granted 1-25 78 Land . Planntag Commission and necessity Act Ill. Rev. Stat. transmission Itne (Section50 granted i 1971. Q.111-213 right-of way 11-29-78)
| |
| Section 50 et seg.
| |
| 111tnots Comunerte General Order 138 111. Public Utt11ttes Extend rattroad spur Granted 2-13-75 Land . Planning Commission Act Ill. Rev. Stat. track across Route 53 1971. m.111213 Section 50 et seg.
| |
| Illinois Department Construction Perett III. Commerce Act June Construct intake and Granted d.29-77 unter . CE of Transportation. (No.15039) 10.1911; (111. Rev. discharge structures M Stat. 1969. O. 19 52 et seq.) j G
| |
| us a
| |
| ACE = Construction Effect; OE = Operational Effect.
| |
| 1
| |
| | |
| 1 1
| |
| l TABLE 12.0-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| AUTmallATIONS REQUIRED FOR COMSTRJ" TION AND OPERATION OF TMr gRAIDWOOD STATION PERMIT REQUIRED STATUS OF PERMIT CATEGORT OF ENVIRoastuTAL INPACTa i
| |
| AGEICV DEscalPT IOM STATUTE AUTmRITY PURPOSE (DECEMBER 1982)
| |
| Illinois Department Revision to Perutt 115. Coimmerce kt Ane Construct sheet pile Granted 10-04-77 Water - CE of Transportation. 15039 10. 1911; (Ill. Rev. cut-off wall around Division of Waterways Stat. 1969. Ch. 19, 52 intake structure ogseq.)
| |
| Illinois Department Registration 111. Pubite Health and Radiation installation Applied for 11-09-79 Radiological - DE of thclear Safety Safety. Radiation registratton Installation Registra- g tion Law. Aly 5.1957 (Ill. Rev. Stat.1979, Ch 111-1/2 Section 194-200 tIf
| |
| *1 Illinois Department Permit Ill. k t of 1941. (Ill. Drtil wells at site for Granted 9-20-74 Water - CE potable mater g3, a of Mines and Minerals Rev. Stat. 1969 Ch.
| |
| 104, 62 et seo.) (
| |
| FQ O e
| |
| Illinois Department Permit Ill. Rev. Stat.1971; ?? re-*Wt 320-foot Granted 6-04-73 Land - Planning h f.
| |
| p of Transcortation. Ch. 127 et see. meteorological tower Otvision of g
| |
| Aeronautics O
| |
| Environmental Prot. A t To construct and operate Granted 4-17-75 Water - CE and OE Illinois EPA. Division Construction and operating perett (Ill. Rev. Stat.1971; the sewage treatment
| |
| {
| |
| of Water Pollution Control Ch. 111-1/2 10001 worts for one year et seq.)
| |
| ACE = Construction Effect; OE = Operatioul Effect. .
| |
| .a
| |
| @4 (D
| |
| u 9 G O
| |
| | |
| O O O D
| |
| TABLE 12.0-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| AU'istIIAT1045 REQUIRED FOR CDSSTRUCTION AND OPERAf ton 0F THE GRAIDuo00 STATION PERMIT REQUIRED STATUS OF PERMIT CATEGORY OF j STATUTE AUTWHt!TV PURPOSE (DECEM0ER 1982) ENVIRmpENTAL IMPACT 4 DESCRIPT!04 AGE NCY tIf Illinois EPA. Olvision Renew operating permit Envirorumental Prot. Act Renew operating perutt Granted 4 11-77 Water . OE of Water Pollution (Ill. Rev. Stat.1971 for the sewage treat- Da
| |
| " Control O . 111-1/2 1001 ment worts A et seq.)
| |
| f f O
| |
| O To construct the intake Granted 6-19-74 Water . E Ch O Illinois EPA. Division 401 Certification FWPCA Sec. el G of Water M11stion and discnarge structures Control i
| |
| Illinois EPA. Division el Certification FWPCA Sec. 41 To discharge into the Granted 10-31-74 . Water - CE 9 of Water Pollution Kankakee River (needed for NRC construction Q
| |
| Control perutt) lllinois EPA. 01 vision 401 Certification FWPCA Sec. 401 To discharge into the Granted 8 18-75 Water - 0E of Water Pollution Kankakee River (needed
| |
| - Control for NPDES perett)
| |
| Illinois EPA. Dietston Construction perett Environnental Prot. Act To construct wastewater Granted 8-22-74 Water - E of Water M11stion (111. Rev. Stat.1971; treatment factittles Control O . 111-1/2 1001 (includes t%e pond) et seq.)
| |
| Illinois EPA. Olvision Construction and Envirofusental Prot. Act To construct and operate tiranted 4-09-80 Air . CE of Air Pollution operating perett (III. Rev. Stat. 1973; diesel generators i Control Ch. 115-1/2 1001 et seq.)
| |
| a W4 ACE = Construction Effect; DE = Operational Effect. W j
| |
| - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ ~
| |
| | |
| TABLE 12.0 1 (Cont'd),
| |
| AUTmR12ATICus REQUIRED FOR CDN511UCT104 AND OPERATION OF THE 8RAIDWOOD STAT!04 PERMIT REQUIRE 0 STATUS (F PERMIT CATEGDRY OF AGE NCY DE50RIPTICM STATUTE AUT@elTY PURPOSE (DECEMBER 1982) EuVIRONMENTAL IMPACTa
| |
| *1 Illinois State Fire Construction permit Ill. E t of June 28 To construct diesel Granted 7 78 E and OE D fuel tanks ar1 turtilne b6 Marshal 1919. Sec. 2 (Ill. Rev.
| |
| A Stat.1971; O.127- oil tanks 1/2. Sec.144) o o 1 o i Illinois EPA, Division Construction and Environmental Prot. kt To construct and operate Granted 4-09-80 Air - CE O O of Air Pollution operating permit (Ill. Rev. Stat.1971; diesel fuel tanks and
| |
| * Control Ch. 111-1/2 1001 turbine oil tanks et seq.) 8
| |
| - o Illinois EPA, Division Construction and Environmental Prot. kt Ts crestruct and operate volume reduction systen Granted 12 20-82 Air OE h of Air Pollution operating permit (Ill. Rev. Stat.1971; Control Ch.111-1/21001 et see.)
| |
| Illinois Departant of Registration Botier and Pressure Register boiler and To be applied for OE Pubitc Safety, Board vessel Safety kt and pressure vessels with of Botter Rules Rules and Regulations the board (1976 edition). Part
| |
| !!! Subsection 1. Part II Pab. 24 q Illinals Department of Inspection certificate Boller and Pressure Certify that botler To be applied for OE P2 1tc Safety. Board vessel Safety k t and pressure vessels f Botier Rules Rules and Regulations comply with regulations (1976 edition), Part
| |
| !!! Subsection 1, Part d 11 Pub. II N
| |
| a Ws (D
| |
| ut aE = Construction Effect; OE = Operational Ef fect.
| |
| G .
| |
| # 9
| |
| | |
| ['N (w' )
| |
| TABLE 12.0-1 (Cont'd)
| |
| AUT@A!ZATIONS REQUIRED FOR EDNSTRUCTION AND OPERATIOu 0F TE BRAIDWOOO STATION PERMIT REQUlkED STATUS OF PERNIT CATE GRT OF AGE ET DESCRIPTlon STATUTE AUT@elTV PURPOSE (DECDIest 1982) ENVIRONENTE UWACTa i g
| |
| *1 Illinois Department of ASE, mA and NPT Stanys Botter and Pesssure Required to conduct To be appited for OE S g
| |
| Pubite safety, Board vessel Safety Act and maintenance g
| |
| .A of Boller Rules Rules and Regulations g N O (1976 edition) Part O
| |
| III 3''''*" '' ''''
| |
| Ill Section VIII b
| |
| g
| |
| ' Grundy/ Wilt Counties Pemit To do county road nort Granted 9-25-75 Land - Planning ,
| |
| $@erintendent of Hipitys Highway (bcuission of Order To close township roads Roads Closed 1-05-76 Land - Planntag Reed Toughtp Will County Butiding and Use Permit To construct Oraldmood Granted 10-29-74 Land . Planntag Station i
| |
| Will CDunty Building and Use Perett To construct intake Granted 1 22-76 Land . Ple:ntag structure Will County Su11 ding and use Permit to construct 320-foot Granted 5-01-73 Land . Planning meteorological tower Illinois Central Agreenent To connect ECo's spur Agreement reached Land . Plannlag l'
| |
| Gulf Rattread Itne utth the Illinois 10-10-75 Company Central Gulf Rattroad a
| |
| @A S
| |
| a2
| |
| * Coistruction Effect; DE
| |
| * Operational Effect.
| |
| | |
| Ercidwood ER-OLS TABLE 12.0-2 CONSULTATIONS WITH STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS OFFICIAL POSITION Ray Hulbe'rt Supervisor of Zoning &
| |
| Building Will County Zon-
| |
| ,ing & Building Department Paul Abrahamson Road Commissioner (deceaseds Reed Township, Will County Terry Petersen District Utility Coordi-nator, State Highway De-partment James Craziano Permit Engineer State Highway Department Douglas Spesia Will County Zoning Board of Appeals H. E. Schwark Superintendent of Highways Kankakee County g Bruce Rogers Illinois Department of Conservation J. Van Meter Illinois Department of Conservation David Mueller U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service R. Clem Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Water Resources Allan D. liay Will-South Cook Counties Soil and Water Conserva-tion District O
| |
| 12.0-8
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS O CHAPTER 13.0 - REF_n_m_ CES TABLIL.RLCQHIEEEE PAGE i Section 1.1 13.0-1 Section 2.1 13.0-2 I
| |
| Section 2.2 References Cited 13.0-8 Section 2.2 References Not Cited 13.0-13 Section 2.3 13.0-14 Section 2.4 Ref erences Cited 13.0-16 Section 2.4 References Not Cited 13.0-17
| |
| ^
| |
| Section 2.5 13.0- 21 Section 2.6 References Cited 13.0-22 Section 2.6 References Not Cited 13.0-22 Section 2.7 13.0-24 Sec tion 3.2 13.0- 25 CLction 3.3 13.0-26 Appendix 3.5A 13.0-27 Section 3.6 13.0-28 Section 3.7 13.0-29 Section 3.9 13.0-30 i'
| |
| Section 4.1 Ref erences Cited 13.0-31 Section 4.1 References Not cited 13.0-31 Section 4.3 References cited 13.0-33 i Section 4.3 References Not Cited 13.0-33 i Section 4.4 13.0-34
| |
| ; Section 5.1 13.0-36 i Section 5.2 13.0-38 1
| |
| Appendix 5.2A 13.0-39 Section 5.3 13.0-40 Section 5.4 13.0-41 Section 5.6 13.0-42 i Section 5.8 13.0-43 i Section 6.1 13.0-44 Section 8.3 References Cited 13.0-49 Section 8.3 References Not Cited 13.0-49 Section 8.4 References Cited 13.0-50 ;
| |
| a Section 8.4 References Not Cited 13.0-50 I !
| |
| l i
| |
| O 1
| |
| 13.0~i
| |
| _ . - . . - . . . . - - ~ - . . - _ . . . _ , . . - . ,
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 C_HAPTER 13.0 - REFERENCES Intentionally Left Blank 1 O
| |
| O 13.0-1
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 llh Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 Section 2.1 Abert, J., 1977, Boy Scouts of America, Program Director, Telephone Conversation with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| American Hospital Association, 1972, The AHA Guide 1:jl the Health Care Field, 1977, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| Arp, A, 1977, Kankakee County Building and Zoning Office, Telephone Conversation on July 29 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Basil, J., 1977, Reichold Chemicals, Inc., Telephone Conversation on July 25 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Research Analyst.
| |
| Bell, C., 1977, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Public Water Supplies, Telephone Conversation on July 6 with J.
| |
| M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Bertrand B., 1975, " Fishing the Illinois", Illinois Department of Conservation, Division of Fisheries, Springfield, Illinois.
| |
| lll Burdick, M., 1977, Will County Sportsmen's Club, Telephone Conversation on March 21 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1971, 1970 Census of Population - General Population Characteristics U.S.
| |
| Summary 7 U.S. Government Printing Of fice, Washington, D.C.
| |
| Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1972, "1970 Census of Housing," U.S. Government Printing Of fice, Washington, D.C.
| |
| , 1975, Population Estimates and Projections, Series P-25, No.
| |
| 601, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
| |
| , 1977, Census of Agriculture - 1974, Area Reports, part 12, Illinois, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
| |
| , 1981, 1980 Census of Population and Housing, U.S. Government $
| |
| Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
| |
| Burton, A., 1977, National Biscuit Company, Telephone Conversation on July 26 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| O 13.0-2 l
| |
| | |
| f')
| |
| k/ AMENDMENT 1 Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 Carlock, R., 1977, U.S. Army Corps of-Engineers, Joliet Project Office, Telephone Conversation on April 6 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent
| |
| & Lundy Cultural Resource Anal.yst.
| |
| Chilman,.B., 1977, Braidwood Recreation Club, Telephone Conversation
| |
| -on March 22 -with J. M. Ruf f, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Classen, M., 1977, Kankakee River State Park, Telephone. Conversation on March 21 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Clements, S., 1977, WESCOM, INC., Personnel Department, Telephone Conversation on April 15-with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Cole, R.,_1977, Indiana Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, Agricultural Statistican, Telephone Conversation on June 29 with J.
| |
| M. Ruff,_ Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Commonwealth Edison Company, 1973, " Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, Braidwood Station," Table 2.1-8, p. 2.1-23, Sargent & Lundy
| |
| - g,) Engineers, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| , 1977a, 316(b) Demonstration, Braidwood Generating Station, Makeup Water Intake System, February 1 Report, Commonwealth Edison Company, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| , 1977b, LaSal?.e County Station Environmental Report, Operating License Stage, Sections 2.4 and 3.3, Sargent & Lundy Engileers, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| Daugherty, J., 1977, LaSalle County Cooperative Extension Service, Agent, Telephone Conversation on July 25 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent &
| |
| Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Doyle, D., 1977, Des Plaines Conservation Area, Telephone Conversation on March 21 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Drill, E., 1977, Beker Industries, Telephone Conversation on July 29 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Dvorak, J., 1977, South Wilmington Sportsmen's Club, Telephone Conversation on March 23 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| /
| |
| () !
| |
| 13.0-3
| |
| | |
| ' () -
| |
| Briadwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 Errek, R., 1977, CECO Employees Recreation Association, Inc.,
| |
| President,- Telephone Conversation on March 25 with M. Tenner, Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) Environmental Affairs.
| |
| 1 Fishwick, J. D., 1977, Norfolk and Western Railraod, President and Chief Executive Officer, Letter of June 20 to J. M. Ruff, Sargent &
| |
| Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Florella, Sister, 1982, St. Rose School, Telephone Conversation September 28 witn J. E. Jung, CECO. Environmental Affairs. 1 l
| |
| O 2
| |
| O 13.0-3a
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS Forsyth, F. , 1977, Joliet Army Ammunition Plent, Telephone Converration Resource Analyst.
| |
| on July 25 'with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Grundy County Chamber of Commerce, Undated, " Industrial -
| |
| Wholesale Directory," Morris, Illinois.
| |
| Grundy County Planning Constission, 1969a, " Garfield and GreenfieldIllinois.
| |
| Chicago, Townships' Zoning Map," County Planning Consultants, 1969b, " Maine and Braceville Townships' Zoning Map,"
| |
| County Planning Consultants, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| 1974, " Goose Lake and Felix Townships' Zoning Map," County Planning Consultants, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| Herbach, M., 1977, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Telephone Conversation on April 4 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent 6 Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Howard, L. , 1977, Midwestern Gas Transmission Line Company, Tolephone Conversation with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Rasource Analyst.
| |
| Illinois Cooperative Crop Reporting Service, Illinois Department g of Agriculture, and U. S. Department of Agriculture,1976a, W alllinois Agricultural Statistics, Annual Summary 1976," Bull.
| |
| 76-1, Illinois Cooperative Crop Reporting Service, Springfield, Illinois.
| |
| 1976b, " Illinois Agricultural Statistics, Assessors' Annual Farm Census 1975," Illinois Cooperative Crop Reporting Service, Springfield, Illinois.
| |
| Illinois Department of Conservation, 1974a, " Goose Lake Prairie State Park," State of Illirais.
| |
| 1974b, "Kankakee River State Park," State of Illinois.
| |
| 1975, " Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail," state of Illinois. '
| |
| , 1976a, "Recreaticnal Areas," State of Illinois.
| |
| 1976b, " Analysis of Sales, 1975 Series, Fishing, Hunting, and Trapping Licenses," Springfield, Illiuois.
| |
| 1976c, " Land and Historic Sites Attendance," Springfield, Illinois.
| |
| 1977a, "Public Hunting Areas in Illinois," Springfield, Illinois.
| |
| l 13.0-4
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1
| |
| .i.r)'
| |
| " ' ' Briadwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| , 1977b, "1977 Illinois Hunting Information," Springfield, Illinois.
| |
| Illinois Department of Conservation, Fisheries Division, 1973, Untitled statistics on commercial fishing, Springfield, Illinojs.
| |
| , 1974, Untitled statistics on commercial fishing, Springfield,-Illinois.
| |
| Illinois 1975, Untitled statistics on commercial fishing, Illinois.
| |
| Department of Conservation, Springfield, $
| |
| Indiana Crop and_ Livestock Reporting Service, Purdue Univ 4:rsity, and U.S. Department of Agriculture,1976, " Indiana Crop and Livestock Statistics, Annual Crop and Livestock Summary 1975,"
| |
| Lafayette, Indiana.
| |
| Joliet Region Chamber of Commerce, 1975, "Joliet Region Directory of Manufacturers," Joliet Region Chamber of Commerce, Joliet, Illinois.
| |
| rx Kelly,.D.,_1983, Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals, Telephone 3 Conversation on February 9 with B. Barickman, CECO., Environmental
| |
| (_) Affairs.
| |
| Klemba, B., 1977, Army Corps of Engineers, Telephone Conversation on April 6 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Larson, R., 1977, Illinois Department of Public Health, Environmental Control Engineer, Letter of August 5 to J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Miller, H. M., 1977, Texaco - Cities Service Pipeline Company, Division Manager, Letter of May 18 to J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Morel, A. F., 1977, Arco Pipeline Company, Mazon District Of fice, Telephone Conversation on April 4 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Mores, R., 1977, Northern Illinois Gas Company, Telephone Conversation on April 1 with J. M. Ruff, S7tgent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Morris, R., 1977, Dairy Farmer, Telephone Conversation on August 18 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| O 13.0-5
| |
| | |
| i AMENDMENT 1 Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 llh Nyhoff, J., 1977, Goose Lake Prairie State Park, Telephone Conversation on March 21 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Pilch, A., 1977, Grundy County Cooperative Extension Service, Agent, Telephone Conversations on June 23 and July 25 with J. M.
| |
| Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Renkosik, J., 1977. Wesclox Corporation, Telephone Conversation on July 26 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Ruff, J. M, 1977a, Field Survey and Telephone Converations on June 23 and August 18 with farmers located within 5 miles of the Braidwood site.
| |
| , 1977b, Nearest Residence and Garden Field Survey on April 12 and 13 of the area within 5 miles of the Braidwood site.
| |
| Schwiesow, B., 1977-Ranger - I & M Canal Complex, Telephone Conversation on March 23 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| 1982, Illinois State Board of Education, Letter of 1 Stoeckel, C.,
| |
| October 18 to J. E. Jung, CECO, Environmental Affairs. lll Tagliatti, K., 1977, Goose Lake Club, Telephone Conversation on April 27 with J. M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Turnland, J. L., 1977, Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, Superintendent of Yards and Terminals, Letter of June 7 to J. M.
| |
| Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| Turnland, J. L., 1977 Illinois Central Guf Railroad, Superintendent of Yards and Terminals, Telephone Conversation on June 28 with J.
| |
| M. Ruff, Sargent & Lundy Cultural Resource Analyst.
| |
| U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1974, " Draft Environmental Statement Relating to the Proposed Collins Generating Station of the Commonwealth Edison Company," Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1977, " Lockage Statistics, 1976,"
| |
| Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1973, "Dresden Nuclear Power Stations Units 2 & 3, Final Environmental Statement," Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
| O 13.0-6
| |
| | |
| 1%
| |
| \ l- AMENDMENT 1 Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Chicago Area Office, and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Chicago- Regional Office, 1977, " Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Finger Lakes Estates," HUD - ROS - EIS 05(D),
| |
| Department of Housing and Area Development, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1976, Regulatory Guide 1.109, U.S. Government Printing Of fice, Washington, D.C.
| |
| i 4
| |
| 4
| |
| ?
| |
| 4 j
| |
| 4 4
| |
| i i
| |
| i i
| |
| 1
| |
| (
| |
| 13.0-6a i-
| |
| | |
| i Braidwood ER-OLS~
| |
| O otion i eierenoes cited Baker, F.C., 1928, eThe Fresh-water Mollusca of Wisconsin."
| |
| Pt. II Pelecypoda, University of Wioonsin, Bulletin No. 1527.
| |
| Edmonds, Peter,1974, Ttstimony Braidwood Envioramental Bearings in Joliet, Illinois, August 28 and 29, City Cotsicil Chambers.
| |
| Nalco Environmental Sciences, 1976, Ige pelecynod Zigne gf,the Kankakee River near Braidwood. Illinois. (NAICO ES No.
| |
| i 550107772), Report to Commonwealth Edison Company, Northbrook, Illinois.
| |
| 1977, Sig Bedino Mappin4 2( 1hg Kankakee River aggE Braidwood Illinois, (NAICO ES No. 550108754). Report to commonwealth Edison company, Northbrook, Illinois.
| |
| Parmalee, P.W., 1967, "The Fresh-Water Mussels of Illinois,"
| |
| Illinois State Museum, Popular Science Series.
| |
| S tarrett, W.C., 1971, "A Survey of the Mussels (Unionacea) of the Illinois River: A Polluted Stream," Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 5.
| |
| *I >
| |
| U.S. Department of the Interior, 1976, " Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants," Federal Register, June 14, 1976.
| |
| van der Schalie, H., 1938, "The Naiad Fauna of the Euron River in-Southeastern Michigan," University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Miscellaneous Publications No. 40.
| |
| Wilson, C.B., and H.W. Clark, 1912, "The Mussel Fauna of the Kankakee Basin," U.S. Bureau of Fisheries Document 758.
| |
| Section 4.1 References Not Cited Anderson, H.G., 1959, " Food Habits of Migratory Ducks in Illinois," Illinois Natural History Society Bulletin, Vol. 28, do. 4, pp. 289-344.
| |
| Andrews, R. D. , and J. C. Calhoun, 1968, " Characteristics of a White-Tailed Deer Population in Illinois," Illinois Department of conservation, Game Management Report No. 1.
| |
| Bellrose, F.C., 1959, " Duck Food Plants of the Illinois River Valley,"
| |
| 8, pp. 237-280.
| |
| Illinois Natural History Society Bulletin, Vol. 21, No,
| |
| ,1973, Illinois Natural History Survey, Havana, Illinois, letter to P.R. Edmonds, Westinghouse Environmental Systems
| |
| ' Department, on migratory patterns of waterfowl at Braidwood, Illinois.
| |
| I f
| |
| 13.0-31 i
| |
| | |
| AMENDMENT 1 g l Braidwood ER-OLS FEBRUARY 1983 W l Environmental Analycts, Inc., 1972, " Interim Report for Dresden Lake Biological Study," prepared for Commonwealth Edison Company, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| , 1982, " Freshwater Mussel Mapping of the Kankakee River Near 1 Custer Park, Illinois", prepared for Commonwealth Edison Company, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| Graber, R. R. and J. W. Graber, 1963, "A Comparative Study of Bird Populations in Illinois, 1906-1909 and 1956-1958, " Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin, Vol. 28, pp. 383-528.
| |
| Green, W. E., 1947, "Effect of Water Impoundment on Tree Mortaility and Growth," Journal of Forestry, Vol. 45, pp. 118-120.
| |
| Larimora, R. W. and M. J. Sule, 1978, " Construction and Preoperational Aquatic Monitoring Program for the Kankakee River.
| |
| Braidwood Station, First Annual Report." Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois.
| |
| , 1979, " Construction and Preoperational Aquatic Monitoring Program for the Kankakee River. Braidwood Station, Second Annual Report." Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois. $ qg
| |
| , 1980, " Construction and Preoperational Aquatic Monitoring Program for the Kankakee River. Braidwood Station, Third Annual Report." Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois.
| |
| Larimore, R. W. and T. M. Skelly, 1981, "Kankakee River Aquatic Monitoring Prograom for the Braidwood Station, August 1981" Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois.
| |
| Linduska, J. P., editor, 1964, Waterfowl Tommorrow, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, U.S.
| |
| Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
| |
| Lord, R.D. Jr., 1963, "Th- Cottontail Rabbit in Illinois," Illinois Department of Conservation, Technical Bulletin No. 3.
| |
| Preno, W.F. and R.F. Labisky, 1971, " Abundance and Harvest of Doves, Pheasants, Bobwhites, Squirrels and Cottantails in Illinois, 1956-1969," Illinois Department of Conservation, Technical Bulletin No.
| |
| 4.
| |
| Scott, T. G., 1955, "An Evaluation of the Red Fox," Biological Notes No. 35, Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois.
| |
| O 13.0-32
| |
| | |
| -( ). Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1966, More Wildlife for Recreation, Lincoln, Nebraska.-
| |
| Verts, B. J., 1957, "The Population and Distribution of Two Species of. Peromyscus on Some Illinois Strip-mined Land," Journal of Mammalogy, Vol._38, pp. 53-59.
| |
| , 1959, " Notes on the Ecology of Mammmals of a' Strip-mined Area in Southern Illinois," Illinois Academy pj[ Science, Transactions _Vol. 52, pp. 134-139.
| |
| Yeager, L. E., 1942, " Coal-stripped Land as a Mammal Habitat with
| |
| ~
| |
| Special Reference to' Fur. Animals," The American Midland Naturalist, Vol . 5 2, pp . 613-635.
| |
| Yeager, L. E., and Rennels, R. G., 1943, " Fur Yield and Autumn Foods of the Raccoon in Illinois River Bottom Lands," Journal of --~
| |
| Wildlife Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 45-60.
| |
| -Yeager, L. E', August, 1949, " Effects of Permanent Flooding in a River Bottom Timber Area," Bulletin of the Illinois Natural History j3 -Survey, Urbana, Illinois, Vol. 25, No. 2.
| |
| V O
| |
| 13.0-32a I
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-012 AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983
| |
| . C Section 5.8 Smith, R. I., G. J. Konzek, and W. E. Kennedy, Jr., 1978, Technolocy, Safety, and Cost of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station, NUREG/CR-0130, Vol. 1, Battelle-Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington.
| |
| 1 Smith, R. *., and L. M. Polentz, 1979, Addendum to Technology, Safety, and Cost of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station, NUREG/CR-0130, Battelle-Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington.
| |
| 4 h
| |
| ^
| |
| O O
| |
| 4 13 0-43
| |
| | |
| r Braidwood ER-OLS -
| |
| L Section 6.1 Adams, J. A., and W. M. Lowder (Eds.), 1964, The Natural Radia tion Environment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
| American Public Health Association, 1971, Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th Ed., Washington, D.C.
| |
| , 1975, Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewa ter, 14th Ed. , Washington, D.C.
| |
| Beck, W. M., Jr., 1975, " Chironomidae," Keys to the Water Quality Indicative Organisms of the Southeastern United States, (Ed. by F. K. Parrish) , 2nd Ed., pp. 159-180. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environ.
| |
| Mon. and Sup. Lab. , Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
| Brown, H. P., 1972, " Aquatic Dryopold Beetles (Coleoptera) of the United States," Identification Manual No. 62 Biota of Freshwater
| |
| _Ecosy s tem s, Water Pollution Control Research Series 18050/ ELD 04/72, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
| Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1972, "1970 Census of Housing," U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.
| |
| Burke, D. D., 1953, "The Mayflies, or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois," Ill. Nat. Hist. Surr. Bull., Vol. 26 (1) , pp. 1- 216.
| |
| Chow, V. T. , 1959, Open-Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
| |
| Commonwealth Edison Company, 1970-1976, Dresden Station S*mi- Annual Report, Dockets 50-10, 50-237, 50-249.
| |
| , 1976a, Quad Cities Station Semi-Annual Report, Dockets 50-2'i4, 50-265, January-June 19'/6.
| |
| , 19764, Quad Cities Station Semi- Annual Report, Dockets 50-254, 50-265, June-December, 1976, Cowell, B. C. , 1960, "A Quantitative 3tudy of Winter Plankton of Urschel's Quarry. " Ohio J. Sci. Vol. 60, pp. 183-191.
| |
| Drouet, F., 1968, " Revision of the Classification of 0:cillatoriaceae," Monograph ro. 15, Acad. Nat. Sci.,
| |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
| E dmun ds , G. F., S. L. Jensen, and L. Bemer, 1976, The Mayflies of North and Central America, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, h Minne sota.
| |
| 13.0-44
| |
| | |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1
| |
| * FEBRUARY 1983 VOLUNTARY REVISIONS Amendment 1 consists of voluntary revisions to the following parts of the Braidwood Station Environmental Report - Operating License Stage:
| |
| Chapter'l Purpose of the Proposed Facility and Associated Transmission Section 2.1 Geography and Demography Section 2.2 Ecology Section 2.3 Meteorology Section 2.4 Hydrology Section 2.7 Noise
| |
| - Section 3.1 External Appearance
| |
| ( Section 3.3 Station Water Use Section 3.4 Heat Dissipation System Section 3.5 Radwaste Systems and Source Terms Section 3.6 Chemical and Biocide Systems Section 3.9 Transmission Facilities Section 4.1 Site Preparation and Station Construction Section 4.3 Resources Committed Section 5.2 Radiological Impact from Routine Operation Section 5.6 Other Effects Section 5.8 Decommissioning and Dismantling Section 6.1 Applicants' Preoperational Monitoring Programs Al-1
| |
| ,v.. ,e
| |
| | |
| 7-1 I
| |
| Braidwood ER-OLS AMENDMENT 1 FEBRUARY 1983 Section 6.4 Preoperational Environmental Radiological Monitoring Data Chapter 8 Economic and Social Effects of Station Operation Chapter 11 Summary Cost Benefit Analysis Chapter 12 Environmental Approvals and Consultations These revisions, along with related changes to the tables of contents and references, have been incorporated into the report as change-out pages.
| |
| O l Al-2 l}}
| |
