ML20132H253: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 20: Line 20:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:v 9 .
{{#Wiki_filter:v 9.
p.#
p 'p* *truq'o,,
          'p* *truq'o,,                           UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES E
      . E              o              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
          $                                      WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
                      /                                                                     '
/
JAN 181983 Ms. Irene N. Mendelson                                         ~
JAN 181983 Ms. Irene N. Mendelson
~
Binder, Elster, Mendelson & Wheeler, Inc.
Binder, Elster, Mendelson & Wheeler, Inc.
4948 St. Elmo Avenue Suite 202 Bethesda, MD 20014
4948 St. Elmo Avenue Suite 202 Bethesda, MD 20014


==Dear Irene:==
==Dear Irene:==
 
Dick Allen, Lillian van Santen and I have reviewed your proposal for long-term evaluation of NRC's career counseling program.
Dick Allen, Lillian van Santen and I have reviewed your proposal for long-term evaluation of NRC's career counseling program. I regret the length of time it has taken for me to respond, but the Holidays, et al, have dealyed things a bit.
I regret the length of time it has taken for me to respond, but the Holidays, et al, have dealyed things a bit.
After reviewing your proposal, it appears to us that the current manner of evaluating the effectiveness of career counseling is sufficient for our immediate needs. I do agree that it would be nice to go into a long-term evaluation process. However, the funding situation and an increase in the number of high-cost, high-priority training efforts prevents me from applying any more money to career counseling than is currently in my budget. I believe, at least for the time being, that I will have to defer any long-term evaluation and be satisfied with the all-inclusive near-term evaluations currently be provided.
After reviewing your proposal, it appears to us that the current manner of evaluating the effectiveness of career counseling is sufficient for our immediate needs.
I do agree that it would be nice to go into a long-term evaluation process. However, the funding situation and an increase in the number of high-cost, high-priority training efforts prevents me from applying any more money to career counseling than is currently in my budget.
I believe, at least for the time being, that I will have to defer any long-term evaluation and be satisfied with the all-inclusive near-term evaluations currently be provided.
I do appreciate your interest and concern, and will keep your proposal in mind in the event future funding allows me to broaden my activities in the career counseling business.
I do appreciate your interest and concern, and will keep your proposal in mind in the event future funding allows me to broaden my activities in the career counseling business.
Sincerel ,
Sincerel,
                                                        /
/
eter J. Goldman, Director Management Development and Training Staff Office of Administration 1
eter J. Goldman, Director Management Development and Training Staff Office of Administration 1
t pe I A l5 3-en
t pe I A l5 3-
                                          ${ f*
${ f*
AM}}
AM en}}

Latest revision as of 09:20, 12 December 2024

Discusses Proposal for long-term Evaluation of NRC Career Counseling Program.Current Manner of Evaluating Effectiveness Sufficient for Immediate Needs.Funding Situation Prevents Application of More Money
ML20132H253
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/18/1983
From: Goldman P
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Mendelson I
BEMW, INC. (FORMERLY BINDER, ELSTER, MENDELSON &
Shared Package
ML20132F816 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-182 NUDOCS 8507190575
Download: ML20132H253 (1)


Text

v 9.

p 'p* *truq'o,,

UNITED STATES E

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

/

JAN 181983 Ms. Irene N. Mendelson

~

Binder, Elster, Mendelson & Wheeler, Inc.

4948 St. Elmo Avenue Suite 202 Bethesda, MD 20014

Dear Irene:

Dick Allen, Lillian van Santen and I have reviewed your proposal for long-term evaluation of NRC's career counseling program.

I regret the length of time it has taken for me to respond, but the Holidays, et al, have dealyed things a bit.

After reviewing your proposal, it appears to us that the current manner of evaluating the effectiveness of career counseling is sufficient for our immediate needs.

I do agree that it would be nice to go into a long-term evaluation process. However, the funding situation and an increase in the number of high-cost, high-priority training efforts prevents me from applying any more money to career counseling than is currently in my budget.

I believe, at least for the time being, that I will have to defer any long-term evaluation and be satisfied with the all-inclusive near-term evaluations currently be provided.

I do appreciate your interest and concern, and will keep your proposal in mind in the event future funding allows me to broaden my activities in the career counseling business.

Sincerel,

/

eter J. Goldman, Director Management Development and Training Staff Office of Administration 1

t pe I A l5 3-

${ f*

AM en