ML20247D241: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000369/1989005]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20247D241
| issue date = 05/15/1989
| title = Forwards Summary of Enforcement Conference on 890428 Re Insp Repts 50-369/89-05 & 50-370/89-05.Issues Discussed Re Instrument Air Sys Interface W/Diesel Generator Starting Air Sys.List of Attendees & Handout Also Encl
| author name = Ebneter S
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee name = Tucker H
| addressee affiliation = DUKE POWER CO.
| docket = 05000369, 05000370
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = NUDOCS 8905250279
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 31
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000369/1989005]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
_
_
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ -
,-
t
. . ,
,
-
<
..
'
>
MAY 151989
Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370
License Nos. NPF-9, NPF-17
Duke Power Company
ATTN: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President
Nuclear Production Department
422 South Church Street
Charlotte, NC 28242
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE SUMMARY
NRC INSPECTION REPCRT NOS. 50-369/89-05 AND 50-370/89-05
This letter refers to the Enforcement Conference held at our request on
April 28, 1989.
This meeting concerned activities authorized for your McGuire
facility.
The issues discussed at this conference related to the Instrument Air (VI)
system interface with the Diesel Generator Starting Air (VG) system.
A' list of attendees, a summary, and a copy of your handout are enclosed.
We
are continuing our review of these issues to determine the appropriate
enforcement action.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Shou?d you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.
Sincerely,
/W
Stewart D. Ebneter
Regional Administrator
l
Enclosures:
1.
List of Attendees
;
2.
Enforcement Conference Summary
3.
Handout
cc w/encls:
T. L. McConnell, Station Manager
Senior Resident Inspector - Catawba
State of North Carolina
bcc w/encls:
(See page 2)
8905250279 890515
I I
PDR
ADOCK 05000369
Q
PDC
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _
_ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
 
_ . _ _ .
c-
t
*
.
,
b
Duke Power Company
2
Tid
gg 1b
bec w/encls:
NRC Resident Inspector
D. Hood. NRR
Document Control Desk
,
.-
l
l
\\
l
RII
RII
hV
RII
RII
II
f.
.. g
R [b?''
&
BBonser
Mh
ock
AHerdt
LReyes
G
ins
F
5/7/89
5/ F'/89
5/ % /89
5/p/89
5/ p/89
5
89
/
!
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _
 
_ _____________._ _ ________ _
;
z..
,
j
-1
.
,
[
<
,
I
.
ENCLOSURE 1
LIST OF ATTENDEES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator
C. W. Hehl, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
E. W. Merschoff, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)
G. R. Jenkins, Director, Enforcement and Investigations Coordination Staff
(EICS)
A. R. Herdt, Branch Chief, DRP
M. B. Shymlock, Section Chief, DRP
P. K. VanDoorn, Senior Resident Inspector, McGuire, DRP
Duke Power Company
H. B. Tucker, Vice President, Nuclear Production
T. L. McConnell, Station Manager, McGuire
D. W. Murdock, McGuire, Design Engineering Manager
R. L. Gill, Regulatory Compliance Manager
P. R. Herran, Design Engineer
R. O. Sharpe, McGuire Compliance
B. Travis, Superintendent of Operations
J. T. Fuller, McGuire Operations
J. S. Warren, Regulatory Compiionce
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
_ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _
.
.
,
*
,
.
1.
ENCLOSURE 2
l'
'
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE SUMMARY
On April 28, 1989, representatives from Duke Power Company (DPC) met with the
NRC in the Region II office in Atlanta, Georgia to discuss (.oncerns regarding
the Instrument Air (VI) system interface with the Diesel Generator Starting Air
(VG) system.
Following opening remarks by S. Ebneter, NRC RII Regional Administrator, DPC
gave a presentation (Enclosure 3) on the subject identified above.
The DPC
presentation covered a system description, sequence of events, safety
significance, root
cuse, corrective actions, and operations response to the
i
event.
T. McConne*,6, Station Manager, McGuire summarized the presentation
followed by H. Tucker, Vice President, Nuclear Production, directing closing
remarks.
DPC stated that the deficiency was identified during a Self-Initiated Technical
Audit (SITA) of the VG system. The deficiency involved automatic alignment of
VG to VI and that a portion of VG was not clEssified as seismic. DPC discussed
corrective actions and an operability determination of the diesel.
They also
concluded that their was no safety issue even durirg a LOCA with a seismic
event.
The NRC closed the meeting by stating that it had served to enhance Region II's
understanding of the issues and DPC's corrective actions.
I
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
_
 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ .
_ ____ _ _ ___ ____ _ _ ___ _ _
__
s.
.
e
4
't
-
,
ENCLOSURE 3
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE
DUKE POWER COMPANY
MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION
DIESEL GENERATOR STARTING AIR SYSTEM (VG)/ INSTRUMENT
,
SYSTEM (VI)
APRIL 28, 1999
NRC' REGION II 0FFICE - ATLANTA
AGENDA * * *
***
H. B. TUCKER
1.
OPENING REMARKS
T. L. MCCONNELL
P. R. HERRAN
2.
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
R. O. SHARPE
3.
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
,
,
P. R. HERRAN
l
4.
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE / ROOT CAUSE/
'
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
5.
OPERATIONS RESPONSE TO THE EVENT
J. T. FULLER
T. L. MCCONNELL
6.
SUMMARY STATEMENT
H. B. TUCKER
7.
CLOSING REMARKS
,
'
.
g
s
- - - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _
5
 
)! l ;-f l
3
j
o
9
-
~
.#
.
~
y
1
E
N
F
.
.
1
R
W
R
=
l
.
E
0
E
2
.
N
0S
N
.
2
. .
.
P
TR
P
D
.
e
.
. _
,
r
S
UE
S
N
.
= e-
n
e.
O
HD
O
R
a
.
e
H
SN
H
.
-
m
y
_
-
.
ms .
-
-
.
-
v
T
/I
T
I
ue
.
s
.
F
=
R
NL
R
.
-
$
w
-
F
UY
S
.
.
o
C
.
t
n
c
RC
T
a
n.
I
...
e
m
O
T
N
Tl
.
a
T
U
-
o
E_ A
E.
s
;
: t
R
l
t R
D
O
DE
hP
F
I
T
RL
R
L
I
2
II
I
R
R
R
=
RF
R
;
C
=
I
.
R
R
P
m
O
O
!
Y
=
=3
O
RS
=
:
e
RS
T
IS
=
IS
RE
RE
=
"
R
R
=
l
g
G
P
G
P
=
U
M
U
M
""
h
O
O
O
O
ER
S
C
S
C
M
R
,R
UK
f
,E
LN
,
L
L
Of
l
O
O
VT (
"
O
O
2
.
l
gl
CR
s
CA
'
R
s
R
^
a
E
s
E
r
T
o
T
n
F
k
.
F
S
R
,
I
N
s
I
e
_f
[
.
A
l
l
)
M .
^
2
_
-
'
l
e
'
. ,!
l''
R
B
E)
.
e
'
I
"
A
s
'
RR
_
k"
'
_
RR
D
.C
3
,
RR
j
lI
e ,
!
.
I
O
E
E
N
IR
R
R
A
)L
t .
Y
I
Y
_m
.
R
P(
e
e.
s
R
R
O
u o
(
LR
[
OT
OE
LN
*
e
s
T
S
(E
3
R
h
R
E
D
r .
4"
ee
R
L
=
_
T
s
.v ev
I
I
I
N
RI
-
N
R
OF
R
I
EC
2
w.
G
WC
l
GR
N
OA
GA
C
"
NK
E~
P
NK
I
.-
T
I
.
N
N
T
L .EN
s. e.
T
=
A
A
R
EDTR
a
R
3'
A
SEIL
4 .
T
T
- .
3
R
e e
T
y
e
T
ESSO
s
s.
S
IOFO
S
i
e
e
j-
f
2
DLFC
..
.
s .
:
[
-c.
R
COF
:
O
s
R
WYFO
2
2
E
TLO
-
E
,
_
:
I
E
S
-
f
-
I
E
E
SVSS
-
FI
RISO
.-
L
T
T
,
sW
O
HTOL
*
eN
W
RL
-
s
"
-
aB
'
.-
N
'
b
~P
TR
N
t '
_
.
r '
ITNO
''
2
1 d
3
NSO
_
UI
O
E
NSE
.
T R
HINS
m
.
aO
CMEO
. a
S
hN N
RDPL
. . u
.
r
TU T
EAOC
. a
_'
. m
.
.
_
Ls
-
.
O
. . n
P
K R
.
uI
_a. A; ~
CE
R
. . .
m
-
-
AD
S
-
-
23
m
's
W
;
9- N
a
1
N
gE
e
.
l
e
Lf
'
-
.
-
-
BE
N
S
_
m_]>< 9
'
I
O
E
I
N
T
V
O
.
"
-
=
-
N
y,-
.
.
'
;'
l
(f!
ilf!
lI6%G
_
R
.
E
.mg-
f
.
_
E
3
l'
'
'.
;
'
N
 
..-
-.
_ - -
,
#
*,e-
,e
l
l
~
-
,
.,
e
DIESEL STARTING AIR SYSTEM
,
DESIGN BASES
'
0~ START EMERGENCY D/G AT LEAST TWICE, CONSECUTIVELY.
EACH START LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 11 SEC.
,
O SUPPLY CONTROL AIR TO DIESEL CONTROLS AND
INSTRUMENTATION
" START" AND "RUN" CONDITION
!
.
-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
_____
 
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
e
..
,
'
..
.
.
VI Blackout Header
l
0$
Note 1
1_ _
,
Blackout Air
Diesel Gen. A
r%,
> Header A
a
blackout
4
header
supply
O.
NSR
Non-NSR
Normal supply
from instr. air
compressor
X
-O
y
Diesel Gen. B
->
Blackout Air
"
blackout
> Header 8
' a
header
-->
supply
Note 1. Opens on a L'oss of Offsite Power, remains closed
on LOCA.
_
 
-
._ _____- -- _. -. _ __ _ - - _
_
. _
_ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ .
_
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - -
_ _ _ _ - _ _
e
- .
,
.
.
.
BLACK 0UT CONTROL AIR HEADER
q
DESIGN BASES
"
.
8
NOT SAFETY RELATED
8 MCGUIRE IS " HOT STANDBY" PLANT
0
LOSS OF 0FFSITE POWER WITH & WITHOUT CONTROL
ROOM EVACUATION
0
OPERATING PROCEDURES SUPPORT OPERATOR ACTION
REQUIREMENTS
8
REVISE FSAR SECTION 9.3.1.3 TO CLARIFY HOT
STANDBY AND COLD SHUTDOWN BASIS
.
6
- _ _ _ _ - - . _ - - - - _ . _ . - _ _ - - _ . - - - _ - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - _ _ . - - - - - - - _ _
-__
 
.
no
i
ta
lo
f
f f
s
e e e
n
I
i i i
o
l
l
l
i 1
l
l
l
l
e e e
t
o
o o
o R R R
a oN
r
l
l
r r
l
l
r
1 1
l
t o o t t
o o t
y y y
o
n r r n n r r n t t t
o o
s M
o t t o o t t
o e e e N N
I
H
e
C n n C C n n C f
f
f
m
o o
o o
a a a M R
r n
a
aC C C 8 C C A S S S N N
e w
N
l
I 1
I
n n z od
0 C
8 A
d d d e e o o
i
e
n 1 I
n n1 I
n e e e v v i i r t
v
e
e e
e t t t i i t t
u e
G n n G G n n G a a a t t a a s L
l
y
a
e e
e e
r r r a a
l
l
s
V
aG G a aG G a e e e r r o o e s
lp
t
t
t
t
p p p e e s s r s
p
S aaS S a aS O O O n nI I P e
u
t
t
t
t
e e
S
o S S o o S S o r r r g g1 4 o x
t
t t
t e e e e e
t E
r
o o
o o
w w wR R p p
)
i
h t t h h t t h o o o
o o y o
3
A
c
c c
c P P P o o o o
l
s h h s s h h s
t t L L p
f
t
i c c i i c c i 1 1 1
p y
o
u
D s s D D s s D
l
l
C C u
i i
i i
o o o o o N N S p
o
1
k
1 D D 1 1 D D 1 N N N s s
I
i o o y u
c
e
a
o 8 8 o o A A o r r r
t t a S
N 1 1 N N 1 1 N e e e n n
r
g
l
z z z w w y y p 3
a
B
P i i i o o
l
l
S
WP
WP W
P
P
P P
W W r r r d d p p
W
(
o
W W
t
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u u u t t P p x o
3
F F F F F F F F
s s s e e U u u o
s s s L L S S A L
-
d
1
e
x x x x x x x x e e e
WWWC
n
u u u u u u u u r r r C C
3
g
A A A A A A A A P P P N N
.
.
i
9
l
A
e
l
s
b
e
a
v
T
la
r
V
t e t
u d n
1
o e e
k e n
5 S S S A A A A S A S A A S A A
t
c N n
i
a
e
n
l
rl
U
B i lA A
no
-
_
i
t
B S S S S B B B S S S S B S B B
a
A A A A A A A A R A R A R R R R
,
co
L
r
8 A 8
8 A A S
e
6 0 4 8 2 6 0 4 2 4 6 A A 3 6
1
b
3 4 4 4 S S 6 6 3 3 3 1 2 1 1
2
WWWWW
m
A A A A A A A A C C C
u
C C C C C C C C N N N
N
I I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I l l
.
 
1 2 1 2
o o o ot
N
e
i
I
f
D
l
l
l
l
o o o o
n n n r r r r
o o o t t t t
i i i n n n n
t t t o o o o
a a a C C C C
l
l
l
o o o A A S B
lor
l
l
s s s
t
o
l
o
I
I I
r r r r
-
n
r o r
e e e e
o
t r t t t t s s s s
C
n t n n n n n n n n
f f f
l
o n o e e e e e e e
t
o C o C m m md d d d
e e e
i i i
e
r
C
n n n n n n n
l
l
l
i
t h
r i i i o o o o
t
n c t e a a a C C C C
e e e
R R R
u
o s e d t t t
O
C
1
l
n n n n g g g g
l
0 n e o o o n n n n
d d d
e e e
e o y
I
l
C C C i i i i
b r a s
B
n n n n
t t t
y
p e
t t t o o o o
a a a
r r r
l
f
p
u t n
p
T n
m b d e e e i i i i
o e u u i
l
l
l
t t t t n n n n e e e
1 C e P T c t t t i i i i o o o o p p p
S
r
A u u u d d d d i i i i O O O
u
r
o n h g 1
O O O n n n n t t t t
t
wT n
c
o o o o a a a a r r r
o
i e i C 8 A c C C C
l
l
l
l
e e e
l
r I 1 1
o o o o w w w
)
i
I
3
A
e t
e r
o
r r r r s s s s o o o
d t g I
t
o
u
e
el a
B e e e
iiiiI
I I I P P P
f
t
l
tu
c c c A A A A
0 C S A 9 C
o
m
nL t h
t
c
N
e e O
e t f f f
m s s m1 I I 1 1 I
2
k
a
u
u C
o i i i
e
a
d r
l
v
i ii o e e o
d r r r o e o o m m m m mm m
O O G R R R R a a a a a a a
e
t u s a i
e e e e e e
g
l
a
B
v
e s r g t i
(
o
a
e t f
r A n n nl l l
l
t t t t t t t
l
L s e u a c
s r i i e
w w w o o o o S S S S S S S
P
s P
l
r n c o o o r r r r
t
.V
d d d t t t t n n n n n n
3
1
e
c w
n g r t t t n n n ni i i i i i i
-
d
e
F t e i
n
x o c e e o e e e o o o o a a a a a a a
C R B L L L C C C C M M M M M M M
l
.
3
a
E L
p
.
1
9
1A
e
l
s
b
e
a
v
T
la
V
r
1
t et
udn
i
k em
3 A A A B A A A A A A 8 8 A 8 3 A A 8
t
oae
n
cHn
U
a
e
l rt
BilAA
-
_
.
.
n
.
t
3 S S S S 8 B S R S S B 8 H H H H N H
o
a
3 A A A A A R R A A A A A D O D O O O
i
co
L
.A
A A A A A A 8 s
r
4 7 8 1 7 7 8 9 2 5 7 0
e
6 2 3 3 4 6 5 5 5 4 4 5 6
b
2 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 3 S 7 1 7
M M V V
8
N
8
e
6
6
n
V V V V V V V V V H
f
0
1
N N N N N N N R R R R 5 5 S 5 S S
e
I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I
0
u
N
8
g
I
 
.
-
y
b
n n
n n
o o
e o
e
t
i
n n t t n n t t n n
s
i i
e e a a e o a a e e
o
l
t
t
l
l
t
i l
l
l
t
t t e o t t o o t t
c
a e s s a a s s a a
d
l
l
I
I
l
l
I I
l
l
e
e o
o o
e o
t
f
s s t t s s t t s s
a
e I
I
n n I
I
n n
I
I
c
_
e e
e e
o
l
t t C C t t C C t t
i
l
e n n
n n
n n
R e e e e e e e e e e
t
C C g g C C g g C C
o
d
r r
r r
n
e y y a a y y a a y y
t
l
l
h h l
l
h h
l
l
y
s
a p p c c p p c c p p
a
l
r p p s s p p s s p p
w
p
e u u
il
u u
l
l
u
e
p
S
p S S D O S S O O S S
r
u
e
O t t t t t t t t n n
d
r
iiiiiii o o
a
r i
e n n n n n n n n ii a
e
)
i
wU U U U U U U U t t g
h
3
A
c c r
o
u
e
P t t t t t t t t e e u t t
f
t
o
o
m
n n n n n n n n t t P e e
r
i
3
k
a
A e e e e e e e e o o
l
l
c
N
1 V V V V V V V V r r l
n n
a
P P
l
I I
l
e
mt t t t t t t t
a
4
e
a
a
B
v
a n n n n n n n n e e W r r
E
g
l
l
e e e e e e o e e r r
i i
-
(
o
a
t C C C C C
'C C C i i r A A
no
P
F F e
r r r r r r r r
t e e
n
t
V
S
e e e e e e e t t c g g
p p p w w w w n n a r r
a
3
n
%U
-
d
p p p o o o o e e e u u
i
1
e
U U L L L L C C R P P
e
a
n
s
3
g
M
.
u
i
a
.
9
l
c
A
e
e
b
l
s
b
e
"A
a
v
T
l
"
a
V
r
r
e
1
t et
d
udn
ken
A A B A 5 A B A 5 A A A A A
a
t
oae
e
h
in
cHn
U
a
e
t
l rl
u
Bil
o
AA
k
,
c
'
a
lb
o
t
d
'
eng
n
i
o
l
ssmmm
s
i
ms
a
S 8
t
H S aS
A A
a A
a
D A
R A A
e
c
r
o
a
L
sev
lav
A A * a a
r
4 s 1 2 A 8 A 8 1 2 A A n
e
A 8
s
e
9 9 0 0 0 2 3 6 7 2 3 5 7 g
b
1 7 8 1
1
3 3 7 7 8 S 1 1 g
e
h
m
W V V V V V V V V F F P P p
T
u
S R R R R R R R R R R V V y
*
N
I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I t
'
.
 
-_
- __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
e
.
.
G h sedeo k face 5h Gd% hem
.
* @d mand d lc.tnm vwlv c.
*
+,,,.C)rpred du pn:>c.eed de cold do#
@"coId shMoM
*
specification 288.1, Type I, Class 0 air quality.
After the filters, air from
both compressors dircharge into a common receiv'ar tank. .
_
From the'd tank,' breathind air is suppl.ed to various locations in he
'
Auxiliary;
.and'inside the Containment.
Isolation valves locsted
outsids ther
neont are installed in series with check valves located
inside the Containment for each breathing air containment penetration.
'In addition to the screw compressors, two low pressure Itquid ring compressors
can be used as backup.
Each of these compressors discharges to a water
separator and then to a receive tank.
9.3.1.3
Safety Evaluation
The compressed air systems are designed to provide a dependable source of
compressed and' cooled air for station serv.f ce, breathing testing, and instrum
sentation requirements.
Sufficient redundancy is provided to give e M $ -
degree of reliability of air supply at all times.
Sufficient air resolver
.ne.
capacity is provided to meet system high ir demand transient 4
%.]
, , . .
Los.s J
W jhu- (s_ cop')
. ,
;
'
.
A foss of instrument air due to a "Stacheut" during norms) operetten causes th. . .
pneuestically operated valves in the station which are essential fem safe
*
,
shutdown to fail to the safe position.
However, many of these valves requitte
normal electrical poweMD If this accident occurs, the plant can L ... )gss of'
an air supply in the evint of Control Room evacuation coincident wgi 2 tetw-J
j
""O i : M ;" condition from the auxiliary shutdown panel and the auxiliar
the b ter panel.
Therefore, air headers have been provided in the Auxiliary
l
o
ry
Building and both ContainmentQgpply air to only those valves which are
-
u .c. 2 2.
The valves which pegweee a blackout air supply are listed in Table
9.3.1-3.
These headers are protected against depressurization by check valves
IV1122, IV1153, 2V1122 and 2V1153.
Air storage for these headers are provided
by the Instr
nt Compressed Air Tanks.
Since the diesel generator power
during "
" is not available for the Instrument Air Compressors, the
blackout air supply headers are aligned to the Diesel Gaperator Starting Air
System headers through a normally closed solenoid valv & Thoth solenoid valves
must receive a "S4eehowt" and a " Diesel Running" signa 1 to open.
3
a. LOCA s;gncd
'OP
w
An ASME, Section III, Class 3 air reservoir is provided o/on the instrument air
piping to each main steam isolation valve operator.
Redundant ASIE, Section
III, Class 3 check valves are provided upstreas of each air reservoir for
isolation free the remainder of the Instrument Air System.
The interconnecting
piping between the check valves, air reservoirs and the main steam isolation
valve operators is Duke Class C.
(Refer to Figure 9.3.1-2).
These safety
class air reserveles are provided as a redundant means of closure for each asin
steam isolation valve.
These valves are aise capable of being closed by spring
action.
Each reservoir has air capacity for a single closure of its respective
main steam isolation valve.
Air reservoir design <s listed in Tables 9.3.1-1
and 9.3.1-2.
9.3.1.4
Tests and Inspections.
The system is fully tasted and inspected before initial operation.
Adequate
operating performance monitoring assures system integrity.
l
* 1-4
1986 R* a
.
 
_
e
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
t.
-
McGuire
Nuclear Station
VG/ VI
Sequence
of
Events
April 29, 1988 Self-Initiated Technical Audit (SITA) of
D/G Starting Air (VG) System began.
!
May I 6,
I988
Design deficiency Identified involving
*
' automatic alignment of VG to instrument
Air (VI) and that a portion of VG was
not classified as scia? tic.
May 16, 1988
Problem Investigation Report (PIR) was
i
initiated; operability deter:ulaation was
requested
May 20
1988
Current operability concerns resolved by
seismic review of oca-seismic port. ion of
VG and isolatin.; VG frcm VI.
May 20
Nov 15, 1988
Past Operability Evaluation
-
Nov. 15. 1988 Determined reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 5 0.7 3(*.)(2)(v)a
Dec. 21, 1988
LER 88-36 was filed.
January I949
Testing of VG/VI f!1tcr resulstor elve
>
.
.
A
 
- - ---
-_
-
.
-
.
.
'
-
.
*
.
Past
Operability
of VG/VI
,
fwo Problems Identified:
l
Seismic
-
VI
was
not
originally designed
-1
-
as a. seismic
system
Air
Consumption
by Blackout Header
,
2
-
a-Information
not generally available
from vendors
b- Actual header
air
consumption would
!
depend on
operator
cycling
of valves
I
,
 
\\
.
-
.
.
1
-
.
.
-
.
Operability Considerations
Due to small pipe size low mass, and adequate
1
- Seismic
-
support, it was felt that the blackout header
could be shown to be seismicly rugged
.
Air Consumption
2
-
a -Preoperational testing had not identified any problems
b -Previous short duration blackout had not indicated a
problem with VG/VI
,
Conclusions
1) VG/VI interface capable of performing its design function.
from a seismic standpoint
2) Past operability could not be determined without testing
.
,
 
_-
- - - - - - - -
--
- --- --- --
-
-
-
-
,
'
-
.
.
.
'
.
8
.
.
VG/VI
Test Considerations
1.-
Blackout header
cannot
be tested
with
the
Unit
above
mode
5
.due
to
the
impact
on
valves
2-
Even
with
a
unit
in No-Mode
(defueled)
there
are
safety
concerns
with
the
potential
impact
i
on
the
other
unit
because
of
the
shared
VI
System
,
3-
Test method (static
test,
dynamic
test, number 'of compressors, etc)
- _ _ _ _ -_-_ _ _-__ _ _ _ -_ _ --___
 
-
__-
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---- -
e
. . . .
.
'
-
.
-
.
Unit
2
VG/VI
Tests
6/28/88 2B VG to VI Blackout Header Test
Test Method-2B VG compressors and receivers were
aligned to 2B blackout header
Results-Little or no change in VG or VI pressure
(most loads were isolated from the header)
7/20/88
2A VG
to VI Blackout Header Test
Test Method-Same as 2B except that all loads were
verified to be aligned to the header
Results-Pressure in VI dropped to test termination
point (approx. 80 psi); VG unaffected
'
Conclusion at end of Unit
2
RFO
1) Regulator protected the VG system
2) Seistnic analysis of blackout header unnecessary
;
3) Not reportable
_ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _
_ _ _ _
-
 
-
- _ - _ -
..
,
..
.
,
.
.
.
.
i
Unit
1
VG/VI
Testing
11/11/88
1A
VG
to
VI
Blackout Header
Test
.
Test Method-Same as 2 A except that a 30 cfm load
was induced
Results-
1) VG compressor w cs able to maintain VG
pressure
f
2) Check valve
1 VI- 12 2 did not seat
Conclusion:
1 -Test results were evaluated on
11/15/89 Due to leaking
check valve, test failed
2-With past condition of the check valve indeterminate,
past operability of D/G 1 A could not be assured. Event
was reported on 11./15/89
l
)
!
L
.
-
._
--
__
- - _ _ _ _
_
 
<
e
.,ec
,
*
y
.
.
,
Additional
Testing
January
1989
1- Focused attention on the filter regulator
If this valve passed less air than the compressor could
would be no impact on VG if VI broke in a
supply
-
seismic event
2- By field testing and bench testing it was determined that:
a- D/G run/ shutdown cylinder needed 55 psig to remain
open
b- The filter regulator valve could pass greater than the
compressor capacity at 20
psig
,
-
1
 
-
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _
_
__ _ __ _ _ _
.
.. ,
,
<
.
-
.
-
.
VG/VI
Conclusions
1- After identifying problem
we
moved quickly to:
a-
Assure
current operability
b-
Determine past
operability
2-
Develope
a test program to determine operability
3- Continued
to refine
test method
and
test additional
trains until
we found an inoperable
train
4- Kept Resident
Inspectors informed
l
l
.
 
.
en -
e--
,e ,
,
*
._
.,
4-
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF ORIGINAL CONFIGlJRATION
.
LOOP W/LOCA
EVENT
-
.
I NO SAFETY ISStJE
.
8 VG S0LEN0ID VALVES REMAIN CLOSED FOR LOCA
.
.
6
-_.._.__..__.______..______.-_____________._._______._____.__._____________.____m__
 
e
.-
.
__
~
.
'
~
-
.
.
SAF~.TY SIGNIFICANCE OF ORIGINAL CONFIGURAT
.
EVENT - LOOP W/0 SEISMIC
DIESELS
8
NON-SAFETY INSTRUMENT AIR RtMAINS
DIESELS SUPPLY Alit TO SEPARATE BLACK 0UT
8
HEADERS WHICH ARE SEPARATED BY CHECK V
8
NORMAL & BLACK 0UT HEADERS INSTRUMEN
AVAILABLE
LIMITED AIR USEAGE SIMULATION OF THE
.
8
AIR HEADER HAVE BEEN INCONCLUSIVE
DIESEL ALTERNATIVES
STANDBY SHUTDOWN FACILITY IS CAPABLE
8
TAINING HOT STANDBY CONDITIONS
;
l
_ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
 
___-_ ______ _---__- -__- _ _
. . . .
a.
.
.
,
-
.
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF P11GINAL CONFIGURATION
EVENT - LOOP W/ SEISMIC
DIESELS
8
BLACK 0UT AIR HEADER
SEISMICALLY RUGGED (SQuG)
N0 UNACCEPTABLE INTERACTIONS
0
DIESEL STARTING AIR COMPRESSORS, AFTERC00LERS, DRYERS
AND PIPING
COMPRESSORS SEISMICALLY QUALIFIED
OTHER COMPONENTS SEISMICALLY RUGGED (SQUG)
,
NO UNACCEPTABLE INTERACTIONS
8
THEREFORE, CONCLUSIONS STATED FOR LOOP W/0 SEISMIC ALSO
APPLY
DIESEL ALTERNATIVES
'
8
TURBINE DRIVEN AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP IS SEISMICALL
QUALIFIED
,
'
e
THE SSF IS NOT SEISMICALLY QUALIFIED.BASED ON A SEISMIC
REVIEW, THE SSF WOULD BE EXPECTED TO REMAIN FUNCTIONAL
FOLLOWING AN SSE.
:
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
 
_ _ _ .
_ __ _
___ ____ __ __--_- _ - _
--____,
+
. , , . . . .
'
l
*
.
.
1
-
.
l
1
i
ROOT CAUSE
.
8 AT THE TIME THE VG/VI INTERFACE WAS DESIGNED, THERE WAS
INSUFFICIENT DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION THAT THE DIESEL
GENERATOR CONTROLS REQUIRED CONTINUED AIR PRESSURE TO BE
MAINTAINED AFTER THE ENGINE !!AD STARTED IN ORDER FOR THE
ENGINE TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE
,
e
W
G
-
--
- - - - - - - _ - _ _ _
____
_
 
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - _ - _ - _ _ _ -
-_ - - _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
__
-_
- - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ .
_-- _. _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,
. . ..
.
,
*
-
.
,
.
LONG TERM CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
SPECIFIC CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
SEISMICALLY QUALIFY DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE
8
STARTING AIR AFTERC00LERS, DRYERS AND PIPING
UPDATE FSAR TO CLARIFY HOT STANDBY VERSUS COLD
8
SHUTDOWN BLACK 0UT AIR HEADER BASIS
PURSUE ALTERNATE SOURCE OF AIR FOR THE BLAC
8
GENERIC CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
0
TOPFORM (DESIGN INPUTS, SITA, IDRs, ETC.)
e
DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION
,
e
I
_. - - . _ - - - . _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ . _ _ - - - - _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _
 
-------- -
c
. . . . .
'
.-
.
,
Operations'
Response
to
the
Event
Implemented
CONSER VA TIVE measures
to
-
ensure PRESENT and
FUTU2?E operability
.of the Diesel
Generators, regardless
of
test
results
ACTION
-
Shut manual VG-VI isolation
valv . ,
,
.
Procedure
changes:
-
-Loss
of Instrument
Air
-
(Abnormal Procedure 22)
-Loss
of Control Room
(Abnormal Procedure
17)
Training / Required
Reading
-
Continuing involvement
in
test
development
-
.
______________.___m-_________
 
.
. . . .
i
-
.
..
.
.
Pre-Isolation
Review
The
effect
would
have
been
-
dependent
on
fault
location
and
operator
action.
Mitigating
factors:
-
On Diesel
start,
Operator
-
automatically
inspects D/G
Control Room
trouble
-
annunciator
2 annunciator
alarms
-
System
reserve
and
tank
-
blowdown
time
.
--
--- 
o
 
-
__ _
e
e
..
.
.
.
Post-Isolation
Review
-
VG
allowed
to
supply
VI
Ble.ckout
Header
only
under
carefully
controlled
1
conditions.
l
- - - _ - _ _ - - _ - - _ - _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
,
. , .. ,
.
*
,.
.
,
DIESEL GENERATOR STARTING AIR (VG)/ INSTRUMENT AIR (VI) INTERFACE
NRC ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE
APRll 28, 1989
SUMMARY STATEMENTS
(1)
McGUIRE EXPEDITIOUSLY INVESTIGATED THE VG/Vi INTERFACE
PROBLEM RAISED BY THE SITA IN MAY, 1988.
WHEN RESULTS
INDICATED THE POSSIBILITY OF INOPERABILITY UNDER CERTAIN
IMMEDIATE. ACTIONS WERE TAKEN TO ISOLATE VG FROM
CONDITIONS,
VI AND ASSURE OPERABILITY OF THE D/G'S.
THIS WAS
CONSERVATIVE AND IMMEDIATE ACTION TO ASSURE CURRENT AND
FUTURE OPERABILITY.
IN MAY 1988 WE BELIEVED THAT PAST OPERABILITY COULD BE
(2)
PROVEN FROM A SEISMIC AND AIR CONSUMPTION STANDPOINT;
WITH CURRENT
THEREFORE, WE DID NOT REPORT THE EVENT.
OPERABILITY ASSURED, WE THEN DECIDED TO SYSTEMATICALLY TEST
AND EVALUATE THE VG/VI INTERFACE TO PROVE PAST OPERABILITY.
TESTING ON UNIT 2 IN JUNE AND JULY 1988 SUPPORTED PAST
(3)
OPERABILITY AND WE COULD HAVE STOPPED THE INVESTIGATION A
THAT POINT.
HOWEVER, FURTHER REVIEW OF THE TEST INDICATED
IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE AND WE PROCEEDED WITH PLANS TO TEST
1 DURING UPCOMING REFUELING.
WHEN THE EVALUATION OF THE TESTING ON UNIT 1 IN NOVEMBER
(4)
CAUSED
1968 REVEALED THAT THE FAILURE OF VI-122 CHECK VALVE
THE PAST INOPERABILITY OF D/G 1A WE EXPEDITIOUSLY REPORTED
IT TO THE NRC.
_ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ -
 
_
_-_ - - _ _ - _ _ _ .
___
_
_
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
se
p
ee
*
.
*
.
e
*
(5)
THE REASON THE PAST OPERABILITY EVALUATION TOOK SO LONG WAS
i
DUE TO THE FACT THAT TESTING COULD ONLY BE DONE UNDER
CERTAIN CONDITIONS DURING REFUELING OUTAGES AND THEN IT WAS
WITH A CERTAIN DEGREE OF RISK.
(6)
BECAUSE OF ALL THE UNCERTAINTIES IN DETERMINING THE ACTUAL
AIR LOADS ON THE BLACK-OUT AIR HEADER, ANY TESTING WE COULD
POSTULATE WOULD NOT PROVIDE ABSOLUTE ASSURANCE OF PAST
OPERABILITY.
THEREFORE, DUE TO THE SAFETY RISK ASSOCIATED
WITH A COMPREHENSIVE TEST AND THE LIMITED BENEFITS TO BE
GAINED, WE DECIDED TO TERMINATE ANY ADDITIONAL TESTING THAT
PLACED A TRANSIENT ON THE B. O. HEADER.
CURRENT OR FUTURE
PLANT SAFETY WOULD NOT BE ENHANCED BY FURTHER TESTING.
(7)
BECAUSE WE COULDN'T PROVE OPERABILITY ON THE OTHER 3 TRAINS
(2A, 2B, AND 18) WITH SOLID EVIDENCE WE DECIDED TO REPORT
THE D/G'S INOPERABLE UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS FROM STARTUP
TO MAY 20, 1988.
THE LER WAS SUBMITTED IN DECEMBER 1988.
(8)
THE POSSIBILITY Dl0 EXIST THAT THE OTHER 3 TRAINS OF D/G'S
COULD HAVE BEEN OPERABLE IF THE FILTER REGULATOR VALVES
BETWEEN VG AND VI WOULD ACT AS AN ORIFICE TO PREVENT BLEED
DOWN OF THE VG SYSTEM.
THIS WAS TESTED IN JANUARY 1989 AND
FAILED.
(9)
IT IS STILL INCONCLUSIVE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE OTHER
THREE TRAINS OF VG WERE INOPERABLE IN THE PAST, BECAUSE WE
HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE PIPING WOULD WITHSTAND A SEISMIC
EVENT AND ACTUAL AIR LOADS MAY BE WITHIN THE CAPABILITY OF
THE VG COMPRESSORS.
(10) WE FEEL THAT OUR ACTIONS WERE CLEARLY PRUDENT, BASED ON WHAT
WE KNEW AT THE 11ME OF OUR DECISIONS.
PLANT SAFETY WAS A
TOP PRIORITY THROUGHOUT THE EVALUATION PERIOD AND WAS
EVIDENT IN THE DECISIONS MADE.
.
- - - - - - _ _ - - - - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
}}

Latest revision as of 21:13, 1 December 2024

Forwards Summary of Enforcement Conference on 890428 Re Insp Repts 50-369/89-05 & 50-370/89-05.Issues Discussed Re Instrument Air Sys Interface W/Diesel Generator Starting Air Sys.List of Attendees & Handout Also Encl
ML20247D241
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/1989
From: Ebneter S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8905250279
Download: ML20247D241 (31)


See also: IR 05000369/1989005

Text

-

_

_

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

__ -

,-

t

. . ,

,

-

<

..

'

>

MAY 151989

Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370

License Nos. NPF-9, NPF-17

Duke Power Company

ATTN: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President

Nuclear Production Department

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28242

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE SUMMARY

NRC INSPECTION REPCRT NOS. 50-369/89-05 AND 50-370/89-05

This letter refers to the Enforcement Conference held at our request on

April 28, 1989.

This meeting concerned activities authorized for your McGuire

facility.

The issues discussed at this conference related to the Instrument Air (VI)

system interface with the Diesel Generator Starting Air (VG) system.

A' list of attendees, a summary, and a copy of your handout are enclosed.

We

are continuing our review of these issues to determine the appropriate

enforcement action.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Shou?d you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely,

/W

Stewart D. Ebneter

Regional Administrator

l

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees

2.

Enforcement Conference Summary

3.

Handout

cc w/encls:

T. L. McConnell, Station Manager

Senior Resident Inspector - Catawba

State of North Carolina

bcc w/encls:

(See page 2)

8905250279 890515

I I

PDR

ADOCK 05000369

Q

PDC

__

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _

_ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

_ . _ _ .

c-

t

.

,

b

Duke Power Company

2

Tid

gg 1b

bec w/encls:

NRC Resident Inspector

D. Hood. NRR

Document Control Desk

,

.-

l

l

\\

l

RII

RII

hV

RII

RII

II

f.

.. g

R [b?

&

BBonser

Mh

ock

AHerdt

LReyes

G

ins

F

5/7/89

5/ F'/89

5/ % /89

5/p/89

5/ p/89

5

89

/

!

--

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _

_ _____________._ _ ________ _

z..

,

j

-1

.

,

[

<

,

I

.

ENCLOSURE 1

LIST OF ATTENDEES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator

C. W. Hehl, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)

E. W. Merschoff, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)

G. R. Jenkins, Director, Enforcement and Investigations Coordination Staff

(EICS)

A. R. Herdt, Branch Chief, DRP

M. B. Shymlock, Section Chief, DRP

P. K. VanDoorn, Senior Resident Inspector, McGuire, DRP

Duke Power Company

H. B. Tucker, Vice President, Nuclear Production

T. L. McConnell, Station Manager, McGuire

D. W. Murdock, McGuire, Design Engineering Manager

R. L. Gill, Regulatory Compliance Manager

P. R. Herran, Design Engineer

R. O. Sharpe, McGuire Compliance

B. Travis, Superintendent of Operations

J. T. Fuller, McGuire Operations

J. S. Warren, Regulatory Compiionce

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _

.

.

,

,

.

1.

ENCLOSURE 2

l'

'

ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE SUMMARY

On April 28, 1989, representatives from Duke Power Company (DPC) met with the

NRC in the Region II office in Atlanta, Georgia to discuss (.oncerns regarding

the Instrument Air (VI) system interface with the Diesel Generator Starting Air

(VG) system.

Following opening remarks by S. Ebneter, NRC RII Regional Administrator, DPC

gave a presentation (Enclosure 3) on the subject identified above.

The DPC

presentation covered a system description, sequence of events, safety

significance, root

cuse, corrective actions, and operations response to the

i

event.

T. McConne*,6, Station Manager, McGuire summarized the presentation

followed by H. Tucker, Vice President, Nuclear Production, directing closing

remarks.

DPC stated that the deficiency was identified during a Self-Initiated Technical

Audit (SITA) of the VG system. The deficiency involved automatic alignment of

VG to VI and that a portion of VG was not clEssified as seismic. DPC discussed

corrective actions and an operability determination of the diesel.

They also

concluded that their was no safety issue even durirg a LOCA with a seismic

event.

The NRC closed the meeting by stating that it had served to enhance Region II's

understanding of the issues and DPC's corrective actions.

I

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. _ .

_ ____ _ _ ___ ____ _ _ ___ _ _

__

s.

.

e

4

't

-

,

ENCLOSURE 3

ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

DUKE POWER COMPANY

MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION

DIESEL GENERATOR STARTING AIR SYSTEM (VG)/ INSTRUMENT

,

SYSTEM (VI)

APRIL 28, 1999

NRC' REGION II 0FFICE - ATLANTA

AGENDA * * *

H. B. TUCKER

1.

OPENING REMARKS

T. L. MCCONNELL

P. R. HERRAN

2.

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

R. O. SHARPE

3.

SEQUENCE OF EVENTS

,

,

P. R. HERRAN

l

4.

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE / ROOT CAUSE/

'

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

5.

OPERATIONS RESPONSE TO THE EVENT

J. T. FULLER

T. L. MCCONNELL

6.

SUMMARY STATEMENT

H. B. TUCKER

7.

CLOSING REMARKS

,

'

.

g

s

- - - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _

5

)! l ;-f l

3

j

o

9

-

~

.#

.

~

y

1

E

N

F

.

.

1

R

W

R

=

l

.

E

0

E

2

.

N

0S

N

.

2

. .

.

P

TR

P

D

.

e

.

. _

,

r

S

UE

S

N

.

= e-

n

e.

O

HD

O

R

a

.

e

H

SN

H

.

-

m

y

_

-

.

ms .

-

-

.

-

v

T

/I

T

I

ue

.

s

.

F

=

R

NL

R

.

-

$

w

-

F

UY

S

.

.

o

C

.

t

n

c

RC

T

a

n.

I

...

e

m

O

T

N

Tl

.

a

T

U

-

o

E_ A

E.

s

t

R

l

t R

D

O

DE

hP

F

I

T

RL

R

L

I

2

II

I

R

R

R

=

RF

R

C

=

I

.

R

R

P

m

O

O

!

Y

=

=3

O

RS

=

e

RS

T

IS

=

IS

RE

RE

=

"

R

R

=

l

g

G

P

G

P

=

U

M

U

M

""

h

O

O

O

O

ER

S

C

S

C

M

R

,R

UK

f

,E

LN

,

L

L

Of

l

O

O

VT (

"

O

O

2

.

l

gl

CR

s

CA

'

R

s

R

^

a

E

s

E

r

T

o

T

n

F

k

.

F

S

R

,

I

N

s

I

e

_f

[

.

A

l

l

)

M .

^

2

_

-

'

l

e

'

. ,!

l

R

B

E)

.

e

'

I

"

A

s

'

RR

_

k"

'

_

RR

D

.C

3

,

RR

j

lI

e ,

!

.

I

O

E

E

N

IR

R

R

A

)L

t .

Y

I

Y

_m

.

R

P(

e

e.

s

R

R

O

u o

(

LR

[

OT

OE

LN

e

s

T

S

(E

3

R

h

R

E

D

r .

4"

ee

R

L

=

_

T

s

.v ev

I

I

I

N

RI

-

N

R

OF

R

I

EC

2

w.

G

WC

l

GR

N

OA

GA

C

"

NK

E~

P

NK

I

.-

T

I

.

N

N

T

L .EN

s. e.

T

=

A

A

R

EDTR

a

R

3'

A

SEIL

4 .

T

T

- .

3

R

e e

T

y

e

T

ESSO

s

s.

S

IOFO

S

i

e

e

j-

f

2

DLFC

..

.

s .

[

-c.

R

COF

O

s

R

WYFO

2

2

E

TLO

-

E

,

_

I

E

S

-

f

-

I

E

E

SVSS

-

FI

RISO

.-

L

T

T

,

sW

O

HTOL

eN

W

RL

-

s

"

-

aB

'

.-

N

'

b

~P

TR

N

t '

_

.

r '

ITNO

2

1 d

3

NSO

_

UI

O

E

NSE

.

T R

HINS

m

.

aO

CMEO

. a

S

hN N

RDPL

. . u

.

r

TU T

EAOC

. a

_'

. m

.

.

_

Ls

-

.

O

. . n

P

K R

.

uI

_a. A; ~

CE

R

. . .

m

-

-

AD

S

-

-

23

m

's

W

9- N

a

1

N

gE

e

.

l

e

Lf

'

-

.

-

-

BE

N

S

_

m_]>< 9

'

I

O

E

I

N

T

V

O

.

"

-

=

-

N

y,-

.

.

'

'

l

(f!

ilf!

lI6%G

_

R

.

E

.mg-

f

.

_

E

3

l'

'

'.

'

N

..-

-.

_ - -

,

  • ,e-

,e

l

l

~

-

,

.,

e

DIESEL STARTING AIR SYSTEM

,

DESIGN BASES

'

0~ START EMERGENCY D/G AT LEAST TWICE, CONSECUTIVELY.

EACH START LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 11 SEC.

,

O SUPPLY CONTROL AIR TO DIESEL CONTROLS AND

INSTRUMENTATION

" START" AND "RUN" CONDITION

!

.

-

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _

_____

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

e

..

,

'

..

.

.

VI Blackout Header

l

0$

Note 1

1_ _

,

Blackout Air

Diesel Gen. A

r%,

> Header A

a

blackout

4

header

supply

O.

NSR

Non-NSR

Normal supply

from instr. air

compressor

X

-O

y

Diesel Gen. B

->

Blackout Air

"

blackout

> Header 8

' a

header

-->

supply

Note 1. Opens on a L'oss of Offsite Power, remains closed

on LOCA.

_

-

._ _____- -- _. -. _ __ _ - - _

_

. _

_ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ .

_

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - -

_ _ _ _ - _ _

e

- .

,

.

.

.

BLACK 0UT CONTROL AIR HEADER

q

DESIGN BASES

"

.

8

NOT SAFETY RELATED

8 MCGUIRE IS " HOT STANDBY" PLANT

0

LOSS OF 0FFSITE POWER WITH & WITHOUT CONTROL

ROOM EVACUATION

0

OPERATING PROCEDURES SUPPORT OPERATOR ACTION

REQUIREMENTS

8

REVISE FSAR SECTION 9.3.1.3 TO CLARIFY HOT

STANDBY AND COLD SHUTDOWN BASIS

.

6

- _ _ _ _ - - . _ - - - - _ . _ . - _ _ - - _ . - - - _ - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - _ _ . - - - - - - - _ _

-__

.

no

i

ta

lo

f

f f

s

e e e

n

I

i i i

o

l

l

l

i 1

l

l

l

l

e e e

t

o

o o

o R R R

a oN

r

l

l

r r

l

l

r

1 1

l

t o o t t

o o t

y y y

o

n r r n n r r n t t t

o o

s M

o t t o o t t

o e e e N N

I

H

e

C n n C C n n C f

f

f

m

o o

o o

a a a M R

r n

a

aC C C 8 C C A S S S N N

e w

N

l

I 1

I

n n z od

0 C

8 A

d d d e e o o

i

e

n 1 I

n n1 I

n e e e v v i i r t

v

e

e e

e t t t i i t t

u e

G n n G G n n G a a a t t a a s L

l

y

a

e e

e e

r r r a a

l

l

s

V

aG G a aG G a e e e r r o o e s

lp

t

t

t

t

p p p e e s s r s

p

S aaS S a aS O O O n nI I P e

u

t

t

t

t

e e

S

o S S o o S S o r r r g g1 4 o x

t

t t

t e e e e e

t E

r

o o

o o

w w wR R p p

)

i

h t t h h t t h o o o

o o y o

3

A

c

c c

c P P P o o o o

l

s h h s s h h s

t t L L p

f

t

i c c i i c c i 1 1 1

p y

o

u

D s s D D s s D

l

l

C C u

i i

i i

o o o o o N N S p

o

1

k

1 D D 1 1 D D 1 N N N s s

I

i o o y u

c

e

a

o 8 8 o o A A o r r r

t t a S

N 1 1 N N 1 1 N e e e n n

r

g

l

z z z w w y y p 3

a

B

P i i i o o

l

l

S

WP

WP W

P

P

P P

W W r r r d d p p

W

(

o

W W

t

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u u u t t P p x o

3

F F F F F F F F

s s s e e U u u o

s s s L L S S A L

-

d

1

e

x x x x x x x x e e e

WWWC

n

u u u u u u u u r r r C C

3

g

A A A A A A A A P P P N N

.

.

i

9

l

A

e

l

s

b

e

a

v

T

la

r

V

t e t

u d n

1

o e e

k e n

5 S S S A A A A S A S A A S A A

t

c N n

i

a

e

n

l

rl

U

B i lA A

no

-

_

i

t

B S S S S B B B S S S S B S B B

a

A A A A A A A A R A R A R R R R

,

co

L

r

8 A 8

8 A A S

e

6 0 4 8 2 6 0 4 2 4 6 A A 3 6

1

b

3 4 4 4 S S 6 6 3 3 3 1 2 1 1

2

WWWWW

m

A A A A A A A A C C C

u

C C C C C C C C N N N

N

I I

I

I I I I I I I I I I I l l

.

1 2 1 2

o o o ot

N

e

i

I

f

D

l

l

l

l

o o o o

n n n r r r r

o o o t t t t

i i i n n n n

t t t o o o o

a a a C C C C

l

l

l

o o o A A S B

lor

l

l

s s s

t

o

l

o

I

I I

r r r r

-

n

r o r

e e e e

o

t r t t t t s s s s

C

n t n n n n n n n n

f f f

l

o n o e e e e e e e

t

o C o C m m md d d d

e e e

i i i

e

r

C

n n n n n n n

l

l

l

i

t h

r i i i o o o o

t

n c t e a a a C C C C

e e e

R R R

u

o s e d t t t

O

C

1

l

n n n n g g g g

l

0 n e o o o n n n n

d d d

e e e

e o y

I

l

C C C i i i i

b r a s

B

n n n n

t t t

y

p e

t t t o o o o

a a a

r r r

l

f

p

u t n

p

T n

m b d e e e i i i i

o e u u i

l

l

l

t t t t n n n n e e e

1 C e P T c t t t i i i i o o o o p p p

S

r

A u u u d d d d i i i i O O O

u

r

o n h g 1

O O O n n n n t t t t

t

wT n

c

o o o o a a a a r r r

o

i e i C 8 A c C C C

l

l

l

l

e e e

l

r I 1 1

o o o o w w w

)

i

I

3

A

e t

e r

o

r r r r s s s s o o o

d t g I

t

o

u

e

el a

B e e e

iiiiI

I I I P P P

f

t

l

tu

c c c A A A A

0 C S A 9 C

o

m

nL t h

t

c

N

e e O

e t f f f

m s s m1 I I 1 1 I

2

k

a

u

u C

o i i i

e

a

d r

l

v

i ii o e e o

d r r r o e o o m m m m mm m

O O G R R R R a a a a a a a

e

t u s a i

e e e e e e

g

l

a

B

v

e s r g t i

(

o

a

e t f

r A n n nl l l

l

t t t t t t t

l

L s e u a c

s r i i e

w w w o o o o S S S S S S S

P

s P

l

r n c o o o r r r r

t

.V

d d d t t t t n n n n n n

3

1

e

c w

n g r t t t n n n ni i i i i i i

-

d

e

F t e i

n

x o c e e o e e e o o o o a a a a a a a

C R B L L L C C C C M M M M M M M

l

.

3

a

E L

p

.

1

9

1A

e

l

s

b

e

a

v

T

la

V

r

1

t et

udn

i

k em

3 A A A B A A A A A A 8 8 A 8 3 A A 8

t

oae

n

cHn

U

a

e

l rt

BilAA

-

_

.

.

n

.

t

3 S S S S 8 B S R S S B 8 H H H H N H

o

a

3 A A A A A R R A A A A A D O D O O O

i

co

L

.A

A A A A A A 8 s

r

4 7 8 1 7 7 8 9 2 5 7 0

e

6 2 3 3 4 6 5 5 5 4 4 5 6

b

2 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 3 S 7 1 7

M M V V

8

N

8

e

6

6

n

V V V V V V V V V H

f

0

1

N N N N N N N R R R R 5 5 S 5 S S

e

I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I

0

u

N

8

g

I

.

-

y

b

n n

n n

o o

e o

e

t

i

n n t t n n t t n n

s

i i

e e a a e o a a e e

o

l

t

t

l

l

t

i l

l

l

t

t t e o t t o o t t

c

a e s s a a s s a a

d

l

l

I

I

l

l

I I

l

l

e

e o

o o

e o

t

f

s s t t s s t t s s

a

e I

I

n n I

I

n n

I

I

c

_

e e

e e

o

l

t t C C t t C C t t

i

l

e n n

n n

n n

R e e e e e e e e e e

t

C C g g C C g g C C

o

d

r r

r r

n

e y y a a y y a a y y

t

l

l

h h l

l

h h

l

l

y

s

a p p c c p p c c p p

a

l

r p p s s p p s s p p

w

p

e u u

il

u u

l

l

u

e

p

S

p S S D O S S O O S S

r

u

e

O t t t t t t t t n n

d

r

iiiiiii o o

a

r i

e n n n n n n n n ii a

e

)

i

wU U U U U U U U t t g

h

3

A

c c r

o

u

e

P t t t t t t t t e e u t t

f

t

o

o

m

n n n n n n n n t t P e e

r

i

3

k

a

A e e e e e e e e o o

l

l

c

N

1 V V V V V V V V r r l

n n

a

P P

l

I I

l

e

mt t t t t t t t

a

4

e

a

a

B

v

a n n n n n n n n e e W r r

E

g

l

l

e e e e e e o e e r r

i i

-

(

o

a

t C C C C C

'C C C i i r A A

no

P

F F e

r r r r r r r r

t e e

n

t

V

S

e e e e e e e t t c g g

p p p w w w w n n a r r

a

3

n

%U

-

d

p p p o o o o e e e u u

i

1

e

U U L L L L C C R P P

e

a

n

s

3

g

M

.

u

i

a

.

9

l

c

A

e

e

b

l

s

b

e

"A

a

v

T

l

"

a

V

r

r

e

1

t et

d

udn

ken

A A B A 5 A B A 5 A A A A A

a

t

oae

e

h

in

cHn

U

a

e

t

l rl

u

Bil

o

AA

k

,

c

'

a

lb

o

t

d

'

eng

n

i

o

l

ssmmm

s

i

ms

a

S 8

t

H S aS

A A

a A

a

D A

R A A

e

c

r

o

a

L

sev

lav

A A * a a

r

4 s 1 2 A 8 A 8 1 2 A A n

e

A 8

s

e

9 9 0 0 0 2 3 6 7 2 3 5 7 g

b

1 7 8 1

1

3 3 7 7 8 S 1 1 g

e

h

m

W V V V V V V V V F F P P p

T

u

S R R R R R R R R R R V V y

N

I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I t

'

.

-_

- __

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

e

.

.

G h sedeo k face 5h Gd% hem

.

  • @d mand d lc.tnm vwlv c.

+,,,.C)rpred du pn:>c.eed de cold do#

@"coId shMoM

specification 288.1, Type I, Class 0 air quality.

After the filters, air from

both compressors dircharge into a common receiv'ar tank. .

_

From the'd tank,' breathind air is suppl.ed to various locations in he

'

Auxiliary;

.and'inside the Containment.

Isolation valves locsted

outsids ther

neont are installed in series with check valves located

inside the Containment for each breathing air containment penetration.

'In addition to the screw compressors, two low pressure Itquid ring compressors

can be used as backup.

Each of these compressors discharges to a water

separator and then to a receive tank.

9.3.1.3

Safety Evaluation

The compressed air systems are designed to provide a dependable source of

compressed and' cooled air for station serv.f ce, breathing testing, and instrum

sentation requirements.

Sufficient redundancy is provided to give e M $ -

degree of reliability of air supply at all times.

Sufficient air resolver

.ne.

capacity is provided to meet system high ir demand transient 4

%.]

, , . .

Los.s J

W jhu- (s_ cop')

. ,

'

.

A foss of instrument air due to a "Stacheut" during norms) operetten causes th. . .

pneuestically operated valves in the station which are essential fem safe

,

shutdown to fail to the safe position.

However, many of these valves requitte

normal electrical poweMD If this accident occurs, the plant can L ... )gss of'

an air supply in the evint of Control Room evacuation coincident wgi 2 tetw-J

j

""O i : M ;" condition from the auxiliary shutdown panel and the auxiliar

the b ter panel.

Therefore, air headers have been provided in the Auxiliary

l

o

ry

Building and both ContainmentQgpply air to only those valves which are

-

u .c. 2 2.

The valves which pegweee a blackout air supply are listed in Table

9.3.1-3.

These headers are protected against depressurization by check valves

IV1122, IV1153, 2V1122 and 2V1153.

Air storage for these headers are provided

by the Instr

nt Compressed Air Tanks.

Since the diesel generator power

during "

" is not available for the Instrument Air Compressors, the

blackout air supply headers are aligned to the Diesel Gaperator Starting Air

System headers through a normally closed solenoid valv & Thoth solenoid valves

must receive a "S4eehowt" and a " Diesel Running" signa 1 to open.

3

a. LOCA s;gncd

'OP

w

An ASME,Section III, Class 3 air reservoir is provided o/on the instrument air

piping to each main steam isolation valve operator.

Redundant ASIE, Section

III, Class 3 check valves are provided upstreas of each air reservoir for

isolation free the remainder of the Instrument Air System.

The interconnecting

piping between the check valves, air reservoirs and the main steam isolation

valve operators is Duke Class C.

(Refer to Figure 9.3.1-2).

These safety

class air reserveles are provided as a redundant means of closure for each asin

steam isolation valve.

These valves are aise capable of being closed by spring

action.

Each reservoir has air capacity for a single closure of its respective

main steam isolation valve.

Air reservoir design

.

.

A

- - ---

-_

-

.

-

.

.

'

-

.

.

Past

Operability

of VG/VI

,

fwo Problems Identified:

l

Seismic

-

VI

was

not

originally designed

-1

-

as a. seismic

system

Air

Consumption

by Blackout Header

,

2

-

a-Information

not generally available

from vendors

b- Actual header

air

consumption would

!

depend on

operator

cycling

of valves

I

,

\\

.

-

.

.

1

-

.

.

-

.

Operability Considerations

Due to small pipe size low mass, and adequate

1

- Seismic

-

support, it was felt that the blackout header

could be shown to be seismicly rugged

.

Air Consumption

2

-

a -Preoperational testing had not identified any problems

b -Previous short duration blackout had not indicated a

problem with VG/VI

,

Conclusions

1) VG/VI interface capable of performing its design function.

from a seismic standpoint

2) Past operability could not be determined without testing

.

,

_-

- - - - - - - -

--

- --- --- --

-

-

-

-

,

'

-

.

.

.

'

.

8

.

.

VG/VI

Test Considerations

1.-

Blackout header

cannot

be tested

with

the

Unit

above

mode

5

.due

to

the

impact

on

valves

2-

Even

with

a

unit

in No-Mode

(defueled)

there

are

safety

concerns

with

the

potential

impact

i

on

the

other

unit

because

of

the

shared

VI

System

,

3-

Test method (static

test,

dynamic

test, number 'of compressors, etc)

- _ _ _ _ -_-_ _ _-__ _ _ _ -_ _ --___

-

__-

-

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -


-

e

. . . .

.

'

-

.

-

.

Unit

2

VG/VI

Tests

6/28/88 2B VG to VI Blackout Header Test

Test Method-2B VG compressors and receivers were

aligned to 2B blackout header

Results-Little or no change in VG or VI pressure

(most loads were isolated from the header)

7/20/88

2A VG

to VI Blackout Header Test

Test Method-Same as 2B except that all loads were

verified to be aligned to the header

Results-Pressure in VI dropped to test termination

point (approx. 80 psi); VG unaffected

'

Conclusion at end of Unit

2

RFO

1) Regulator protected the VG system

2) Seistnic analysis of blackout header unnecessary

3) Not reportable

_ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _

_ _ _ _

-

-

- _ - _ -

..

,

..

.

,

.

.

.

.

i

Unit

1

VG/VI

Testing

11/11/88

1A

VG

to

VI

Blackout Header

Test

.

Test Method-Same as 2 A except that a 30 cfm load

was induced

Results-

1) VG compressor w cs able to maintain VG

pressure

f

2) Check valve

1 VI- 12 2 did not seat

Conclusion:

1 -Test results were evaluated on

11/15/89 Due to leaking

check valve, test failed

2-With past condition of the check valve indeterminate,

past operability of D/G 1 A could not be assured. Event

was reported on 11./15/89

l

)

!

L

.

-

._

--

__

- - _ _ _ _

_

<

e

.,ec

,

y

.

.

,

Additional

Testing

January

1989

1- Focused attention on the filter regulator

If this valve passed less air than the compressor could

would be no impact on VG if VI broke in a

supply

-

seismic event

2- By field testing and bench testing it was determined that:

a- D/G run/ shutdown cylinder needed 55 psig to remain

open

b- The filter regulator valve could pass greater than the

compressor capacity at 20

psig

,

-

1

-

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _

_

__ _ __ _ _ _

.

.. ,

,

<

.

-

.

-

.

VG/VI

Conclusions

1- After identifying problem

we

moved quickly to:

a-

Assure

current operability

b-

Determine past

operability

2-

Develope

a test program to determine operability

3- Continued

to refine

test method

and

test additional

trains until

we found an inoperable

train

4- Kept Resident

Inspectors informed

l

l

.

.

en -

e--

,e ,

,

._

.,

4-

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF ORIGINAL CONFIGlJRATION

.

LOOP W/LOCA

EVENT

-

.

I NO SAFETY ISStJE

.

8 VG S0LEN0ID VALVES REMAIN CLOSED FOR LOCA

.

.

6

-_.._.__..__.______..______.-_____________._._______._____.__._____________.____m__

e

.-

.

__

~

.

'

~

-

.

.

SAF~.TY SIGNIFICANCE OF ORIGINAL CONFIGURAT

.

EVENT - LOOP W/0 SEISMIC

DIESELS

8

NON-SAFETY INSTRUMENT AIR RtMAINS

DIESELS SUPPLY Alit TO SEPARATE BLACK 0UT

8

HEADERS WHICH ARE SEPARATED BY CHECK V

8

NORMAL & BLACK 0UT HEADERS INSTRUMEN

AVAILABLE

LIMITED AIR USEAGE SIMULATION OF THE

.

8

AIR HEADER HAVE BEEN INCONCLUSIVE

DIESEL ALTERNATIVES

STANDBY SHUTDOWN FACILITY IS CAPABLE

8

TAINING HOT STANDBY CONDITIONS

l

_ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_

___-_ ______ _---__- -__- _ _

. . . .

a.

.

.

,

-

.

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF P11GINAL CONFIGURATION

EVENT - LOOP W/ SEISMIC

DIESELS

8

BLACK 0UT AIR HEADER

SEISMICALLY RUGGED (SQuG)

N0 UNACCEPTABLE INTERACTIONS

0

DIESEL STARTING AIR COMPRESSORS, AFTERC00LERS, DRYERS

AND PIPING

COMPRESSORS SEISMICALLY QUALIFIED

OTHER COMPONENTS SEISMICALLY RUGGED (SQUG)

,

NO UNACCEPTABLE INTERACTIONS

8

THEREFORE, CONCLUSIONS STATED FOR LOOP W/0 SEISMIC ALSO

APPLY

DIESEL ALTERNATIVES

'

8

TURBINE DRIVEN AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP IS SEISMICALL

QUALIFIED

,

'

e

THE SSF IS NOT SEISMICALLY QUALIFIED.BASED ON A SEISMIC

REVIEW, THE SSF WOULD BE EXPECTED TO REMAIN FUNCTIONAL

FOLLOWING AN SSE.

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

_ _ _ .

_ __ _

___ ____ __ __--_- _ - _

--____,

+

. , , . . . .

'

l

.

.

1

-

.

l

1

i

ROOT CAUSE

.

8 AT THE TIME THE VG/VI INTERFACE WAS DESIGNED, THERE WAS

INSUFFICIENT DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION THAT THE DIESEL

GENERATOR CONTROLS REQUIRED CONTINUED AIR PRESSURE TO BE

MAINTAINED AFTER THE ENGINE !!AD STARTED IN ORDER FOR THE

ENGINE TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE

,

e

W

G

-

--

- - - - - - - _ - _ _ _

____

_

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - _ - _ - _ _ _ -

-_ - - _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

__

-_

- - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ .

_-- _. _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,

. . ..

.

,

-

.

,

.

LONG TERM CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

SPECIFIC CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

SEISMICALLY QUALIFY DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE

8

STARTING AIR AFTERC00LERS, DRYERS AND PIPING

UPDATE FSAR TO CLARIFY HOT STANDBY VERSUS COLD

8

SHUTDOWN BLACK 0UT AIR HEADER BASIS

PURSUE ALTERNATE SOURCE OF AIR FOR THE BLAC

8

GENERIC CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

0

TOPFORM (DESIGN INPUTS, SITA, IDRs, ETC.)

e

DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION

,

e

I

_. - - . _ - - - . _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ . _ _ - - - - _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _


-

c

. . . . .

'

.-

.

,

Operations'

Response

to

the

Event

Implemented

CONSER VA TIVE measures

to

-

ensure PRESENT and

FUTU2?E operability

.of the Diesel

Generators, regardless

of

test

results

ACTION

-

Shut manual VG-VI isolation

valv . ,

,

.

Procedure

changes:

-

-Loss

of Instrument

Air

-

(Abnormal Procedure 22)

-Loss

of Control Room

(Abnormal Procedure

17)

Training / Required

Reading

-

Continuing involvement

in

test

development

-

.

______________.___m-_________

.

. . . .

i

-

.

..

.

.

Pre-Isolation

Review

The

effect

would

have

been

-

dependent

on

fault

location

and

operator

action.

Mitigating

factors:

-

On Diesel

start,

Operator

-

automatically

inspects D/G

Control Room

trouble

-

annunciator

2 annunciator

alarms

-

System

reserve

and

tank

-

blowdown

time

.

--

---

o

-

__ _

e

e

..

.

.

.

Post-Isolation

Review

-

VG

allowed

to

supply

VI

Ble.ckout

Header

only

under

carefully

controlled

1

conditions.

l

- - - _ - _ _ - - _ - - _ - _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,

. , .. ,

.

,.

.

,

DIESEL GENERATOR STARTING AIR (VG)/ INSTRUMENT AIR (VI) INTERFACE

NRC ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

APRll 28, 1989

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

(1)

McGUIRE EXPEDITIOUSLY INVESTIGATED THE VG/Vi INTERFACE

PROBLEM RAISED BY THE SITA IN MAY, 1988.

WHEN RESULTS

INDICATED THE POSSIBILITY OF INOPERABILITY UNDER CERTAIN

IMMEDIATE. ACTIONS WERE TAKEN TO ISOLATE VG FROM

CONDITIONS,

VI AND ASSURE OPERABILITY OF THE D/G'S.

THIS WAS

CONSERVATIVE AND IMMEDIATE ACTION TO ASSURE CURRENT AND

FUTURE OPERABILITY.

IN MAY 1988 WE BELIEVED THAT PAST OPERABILITY COULD BE

(2)

PROVEN FROM A SEISMIC AND AIR CONSUMPTION STANDPOINT;

WITH CURRENT

THEREFORE, WE DID NOT REPORT THE EVENT.

OPERABILITY ASSURED, WE THEN DECIDED TO SYSTEMATICALLY TEST

AND EVALUATE THE VG/VI INTERFACE TO PROVE PAST OPERABILITY.

TESTING ON UNIT 2 IN JUNE AND JULY 1988 SUPPORTED PAST

(3)

OPERABILITY AND WE COULD HAVE STOPPED THE INVESTIGATION A

THAT POINT.

HOWEVER, FURTHER REVIEW OF THE TEST INDICATED

IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE AND WE PROCEEDED WITH PLANS TO TEST

1 DURING UPCOMING REFUELING.

WHEN THE EVALUATION OF THE TESTING ON UNIT 1 IN NOVEMBER

(4)

CAUSED

1968 REVEALED THAT THE FAILURE OF VI-122 CHECK VALVE

THE PAST INOPERABILITY OF D/G 1A WE EXPEDITIOUSLY REPORTED

IT TO THE NRC.

_ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ -

_

_-_ - - _ _ - _ _ _ .

___

_

_

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

se

p

ee

.

.

e

(5)

THE REASON THE PAST OPERABILITY EVALUATION TOOK SO LONG WAS

i

DUE TO THE FACT THAT TESTING COULD ONLY BE DONE UNDER

CERTAIN CONDITIONS DURING REFUELING OUTAGES AND THEN IT WAS

WITH A CERTAIN DEGREE OF RISK.

(6)

BECAUSE OF ALL THE UNCERTAINTIES IN DETERMINING THE ACTUAL

AIR LOADS ON THE BLACK-OUT AIR HEADER, ANY TESTING WE COULD

POSTULATE WOULD NOT PROVIDE ABSOLUTE ASSURANCE OF PAST

OPERABILITY.

THEREFORE, DUE TO THE SAFETY RISK ASSOCIATED

WITH A COMPREHENSIVE TEST AND THE LIMITED BENEFITS TO BE

GAINED, WE DECIDED TO TERMINATE ANY ADDITIONAL TESTING THAT

PLACED A TRANSIENT ON THE B. O. HEADER.

CURRENT OR FUTURE

PLANT SAFETY WOULD NOT BE ENHANCED BY FURTHER TESTING.

(7)

BECAUSE WE COULDN'T PROVE OPERABILITY ON THE OTHER 3 TRAINS

(2A, 2B, AND 18) WITH SOLID EVIDENCE WE DECIDED TO REPORT

THE D/G'S INOPERABLE UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS FROM STARTUP

TO MAY 20, 1988.

THE LER WAS SUBMITTED IN DECEMBER 1988.

(8)

THE POSSIBILITY Dl0 EXIST THAT THE OTHER 3 TRAINS OF D/G'S

COULD HAVE BEEN OPERABLE IF THE FILTER REGULATOR VALVES

BETWEEN VG AND VI WOULD ACT AS AN ORIFICE TO PREVENT BLEED

DOWN OF THE VG SYSTEM.

THIS WAS TESTED IN JANUARY 1989 AND

FAILED.

(9)

IT IS STILL INCONCLUSIVE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE OTHER

THREE TRAINS OF VG WERE INOPERABLE IN THE PAST, BECAUSE WE

HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE PIPING WOULD WITHSTAND A SEISMIC

EVENT AND ACTUAL AIR LOADS MAY BE WITHIN THE CAPABILITY OF

THE VG COMPRESSORS.

(10) WE FEEL THAT OUR ACTIONS WERE CLEARLY PRUDENT, BASED ON WHAT

WE KNEW AT THE 11ME OF OUR DECISIONS.

PLANT SAFETY WAS A

TOP PRIORITY THROUGHOUT THE EVALUATION PERIOD AND WAS

EVIDENT IN THE DECISIONS MADE.

.

- - - - - - _ _ - - - - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _