IR 05000321/2009013: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-_ _ _ . _ - . . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . .. _ ___ _ ,
{{#Wiki_filter:-_
MU i
_ _.
l    OCT 2 e 1985
_.
 
_
-..
_
__.
 
. _. _ _
_ _ _ _.... _ ___ _
_.
 
MU
,
i l
OCT 2 e 1985
!
!
Nichols Homeshield 1725 Walkingham Road Davenport, IA 52802 Gentlemen:
Nichols Homeshield 1725 Walkingham Road Davenport, IA 52802 Gentlemen:
As a result of the inspection conducted on March 21 to September 13, 1985, a Form NRC-591, SAFETY INSPECTION, is issued for your NRC general licens M The enclosed form sets forth the item of noncompliance noted. Please
As a result of the inspection conducted on March 21 to September 13, 1985, a Form NRC-591, SAFETY INSPECTION, is issued for your NRC general license.
[u acknowledge receipt of this form by signing and dating in the appropriate space on all copies. You are requested to retain the original and return T- four signed and dated copies to this office within ten day The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and telephone interviews with your personne If you have any questions or require clarification on any of the information stated above, you may contact us at (312) 790-561 Thank you for your cooperatio ,-
 
M The enclosed form sets forth the item of noncompliance noted.
 
Please
[u acknowledge receipt of this form by signing and dating in the appropriate T-space on all copies.
 
You are requested to retain the original and return (
four signed and dated copies to this office within ten days.
 
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection.
 
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and telephone interviews with your personnel.
 
If you have any questions or require clarification on any of the information stated above, you may contact us at (312) 790-5616.
 
Thank you for your cooperation.
 
,-


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
#e s
.
,
,
    .
"
    #e  s
D. G. Wiedeman, Chief Nuclear Materials Safety Section 1 Enclosure:
      "
As stated bec w/ encl:
D. G. Wiedeman, Chief Nuclear Materials Safety Section 1 Enclosure: As stated bec w/ encl:     i L. Cobb, 01E
i L. Cobb, 01E
        '
'
S. Baggett, NMSS
S. Baggett, NMSS
        :
\\
      \
\\
      \
\\
      \
'
  '
\\
' s      [
[
s
'
RIII f
RIII f
  *
*
o<
o<
Wiedeman/jp 10/28/85 3,3g3g     \@
Wiedeman/jp
9901140040 851029 PDR RC *
\\@
SSD PDR
10/28/85 3,3g3g 9901140040 851029 PDR RC
*
SSD PDR


- . - _ . . . . ._ - . - _ . -. . . _ . - - - . _ _ . - _ _ _ .
-. - _..
GENERAL LICENSE GAUGE DATA COLLECTION FORM 1. Name and Address of Ceneral Licensee:
.
Nichols Homeshield 1725 Walkingham Road Davenport, IA 52802 2. Principal Business of Licensee:
.
._
-.
- _.
-.
.
.
_.
-
-
-.
_ _. - _ _ _.
GENERAL LICENSE GAUGE DATA COLLECTION FORM 1.
 
Name and Address of Ceneral Licensee:
Nichols Homeshield 1725 Walkingham Road Davenport, IA 52802 2.
 
Principal Business of Licensee:
'
Aluminum Processing 3.
 
Purpose for which gauge (s) are used (e.g., measurement of level, density, flow, thickness, etc.):
h Thickness Control 4.
 
Gauge Specifics: One gauge a.
 
Manufacturer:
Accuray Corporation b.
 
Model Number:
U-3 c.
 
Isotope / Activity:
strontium-90/70 millicuries d.
 
Date Received:
N/A
;
l e.
 
Date Replaced:
-
5.
 
Name of specific licensee that installed gauge:
j Accuray Corporation 6.
 
Does the gauge have a durable, legible and visible label:
j l
Yes l
'
'
Aluminum Processing 3. Purpose for which gauge (s) are used (e.g., measurement of level, density, flow, thickness, etc.):
7.
h Thickness Control 4. Gauge Specifics: One gauge Manufacturer: Accuray Corporation Model Number: U-3 Isotope / Activity: strontium-90/70 millicuries
 
; Date Received: N/A l Date Replaced: -
Was an Initial Radiation Survey performed at time of installation and do they have a record (list results) NOTE:
5. Name of specific licensee that installed gauge:
records only required for 2 year period:
j  Accuray Corporation 6. Does the gauge have a durable, legible and visible label:  j l  Yes l
i Unknown
'
'
7. Was an Initial Radiation Survey performed at time of installation and do they have a record (list results) NOTE: records only required for 2 year period:      i
l 8.
        '
 
Unknown l
Leak Tests:
8. Leak Tests:
l a.
l Have the tests been performed (list results):
 
Have the tests been performed (list results):
Yes, less than 0.005 mil 11 curies
Yes, less than 0.005 mil 11 curies
! Name of firm / person conducting test:
!
b.
 
Name of firm / person conducting test:
Accuray Corporation i
Accuray Corporation i
.
.
Line 70: Line 160:
s
s


. _ _ _ . _ . _ . .. ._ _ _ . . - . ___ _ _ . _ - - _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . . __. __ ___.. .
. _ _ _. _. _...
I Are records available of tests (list date of last test):
._
NOTE: records only maintained for 2 years     1-M Only record for May 5, 1985 tests availabl Some records unavailabl . Operational Test of Gauge: Have any tests been performed of the on/off mechanism:
_ _.
Yes, test ok according to Accuray Corporation, Name of firm / person who performed test:
. -. ___ _ _. _ - - _. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _.
Accuray Corporation l Are~ records maintained of tests (list dates):
. __. __ ___...
  $. Yes, May 5, 1985 and October 23, 1984
Are records available of tests (list date of last test):
          !
c.
1 Has the gauge been moved from it's original location? If so, by whom:
 
No 1 Does the licensee have personnel who are responsible for assuring compliance with the General License Conditions (10 CFR 31, 31.5(c)
NOTE:
  (1 through 10):
records only maintained for 2 years-M Only record for May 5, 1985 tests available.
Yes, Roger Peyton, Plant Engineer 1 Has the licensee made any transfers of gauges:     l No 1 Name and Address of Gauge Manufacturer:
 
i
Some records unavailable.
          '
 
Accuray Corporation 650 Ackerman Road       i P.O. Box 02248       i Columbus, OH 43202       !
9.
1 Onsite inspection of gauge (s) (list observations / measurements):
 
  $ Accuray supplied the following dates: May 5, 1985; October 23, 1984; i April 5, 1984 and October 26, 1983. Test results on these dates were i
Operational Test of Gauge:
satisfactory according to Accuray Corporatio During the last of several calls to Nichols Homeshield, Roger Peyton, l Plant Engineer stated that the test records were not available at the   !
a.
!  plant and stated further that Nichols Homeshield was attempting to get the records from Accuray Corporation,     j
 
Have any tests been performed of the on/off mechanism:
Yes, test ok according to Accuray Corporation, b.
 
Name of firm / person who performed test:
Accuray Corporation c.
 
Are~ records maintained of tests (list dates):
$.
Yes, May 5, 1985 and October 23, 1984 10.
 
Has the gauge been moved from it's original location? If so, by whom:
No 11.
 
Does the licensee have personnel who are responsible for assuring compliance with the General License Conditions (10 CFR 31, 31.5(c)
(1 through 10):
Yes, Roger Peyton, Plant Engineer 12.
 
Has the licensee made any transfers of gauges:
No 13.
 
Name and Address of Gauge Manufacturer:
i Accuray Corporation
'
650 Ackerman Road i
P.O. Box 02248 Columbus, OH 43202 14.
 
Onsite inspection of gauge (s) (list observations / measurements):
$ Accuray supplied the following dates:
May 5, 1985; October 23, 1984; i
April 5, 1984 and October 26, 1983.
 
Test results on these dates were i
satisfactory according to Accuray Corporation.
 
During the last of several calls to Nichols Homeshield, Roger Peyton, l
Plant Engineer stated that the test records were not available at the
!
plant and stated further that Nichols Homeshield was attempting to get the records from Accuray Corporation, j
 
O
-
m
-
 
.
_
.
-.
_
.
...-. - _.
..
.
.
15.


O -
Name of ORAU Reviewer
m  -
.! ' ''
s eddy
/o-2 f~ff
.
Ricnard C. Ro'okard Date 16.


. _ . -. _ . .. .- . - _ . .. . .
Signature and Date of NRC Reviewer
15. Name of ORAU Reviewer
, -..
  . .! ' ''
. )
Ricnard C. Ro'okard s eddy  /o- 2 f~ff Date 16. Signature and Date of NRC Reviewer
./
  , - . .
.
  .)
,&N: " ^
  ./
/6~2f-ff
  .
'
  '
D: G.'Wiedeman
D: G.'Wiedeman
  ,&N: " ^ '
,
    ,  /6~2f-ff Date i
'
      ,
Date i
      )
,
l l
)
      ,
l
,


l
l
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 08:31, 10 December 2024

Forwards Form NRC-591,Safety Insp for Insp Conducted on 850321-0913 of Nichols Homeshield NRC General License. Noncompliance Noted.Original Should Be Retained & Four Signed & Dtd Copies Should Be Returned within 10 Days
ML20199B676
Person / Time
Site: Hatch
Issue date: 10/29/1985
From: Wiedeman D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
External (Affiliation Not Assigned)
Shared Package
ML20199B681 List:
References
SSD, NUDOCS 9901140040
Download: ML20199B676 (4)
v • d • e


Text

-_

_ _.

_.

_

-..

_

__.

. _. _ _

_ _ _ _.... _ ___ _

_.

MU

,

i l

OCT 2 e 1985

!

Nichols Homeshield 1725 Walkingham Road Davenport, IA 52802 Gentlemen:

As a result of the inspection conducted on March 21 to September 13, 1985, a Form NRC-591, SAFETY INSPECTION, is issued for your NRC general license.

M The enclosed form sets forth the item of noncompliance noted.

Please

[u acknowledge receipt of this form by signing and dating in the appropriate T-space on all copies.

You are requested to retain the original and return (

four signed and dated copies to this office within ten days.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and telephone interviews with your personnel.

If you have any questions or require clarification on any of the information stated above, you may contact us at (312) 790-5616.

Thank you for your cooperation.

,-

Sincerely,

  1. e s

.

,

"

D. G. Wiedeman, Chief Nuclear Materials Safety Section 1 Enclosure:

As stated bec w/ encl:

i L. Cobb, 01E

'

S. Baggett, NMSS

\\

\\

\\

'

\\

[

s

'

RIII f

o<

Wiedeman/jp

\\@

10/28/85 3,3g3g 9901140040 851029 PDR RC

SSD PDR

-. - _..

.

.

._

-.

- _.

-.

.

.

_.

-

-

-.

_ _. - _ _ _.

GENERAL LICENSE GAUGE DATA COLLECTION FORM 1.

Name and Address of Ceneral Licensee:

Nichols Homeshield 1725 Walkingham Road Davenport, IA 52802 2.

Principal Business of Licensee:

'

Aluminum Processing 3.

Purpose for which gauge (s) are used (e.g., measurement of level, density, flow, thickness, etc.):

h Thickness Control 4.

Gauge Specifics: One gauge a.

Manufacturer:

Accuray Corporation b.

Model Number:

U-3 c.

Isotope / Activity:

strontium-90/70 millicuries d.

Date Received:

N/A

l e.

Date Replaced:

-

5.

Name of specific licensee that installed gauge:

j Accuray Corporation 6.

Does the gauge have a durable, legible and visible label:

j l

Yes l

'

7.

Was an Initial Radiation Survey performed at time of installation and do they have a record (list results) NOTE:

records only required for 2 year period:

i Unknown

'

l 8.

Leak Tests:

l a.

Have the tests been performed (list results):

Yes, less than 0.005 mil 11 curies

!

b.

Name of firm / person conducting test:

Accuray Corporation i

.

-

s

. _ _ _. _. _...

._

_ _.

. -. ___ _ _. _ - - _. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _.

. __. __ ___...

Are records available of tests (list date of last test):

c.

NOTE:

records only maintained for 2 years-M Only record for May 5, 1985 tests available.

Some records unavailable.

9.

Operational Test of Gauge:

a.

Have any tests been performed of the on/off mechanism:

Yes, test ok according to Accuray Corporation, b.

Name of firm / person who performed test:

Accuray Corporation c.

Are~ records maintained of tests (list dates):

$.

Yes, May 5, 1985 and October 23, 1984 10.

Has the gauge been moved from it's original location? If so, by whom:

No 11.

Does the licensee have personnel who are responsible for assuring compliance with the General License Conditions (10 CFR 31, 31.5(c)

(1 through 10):

Yes, Roger Peyton, Plant Engineer 12.

Has the licensee made any transfers of gauges:

No 13.

Name and Address of Gauge Manufacturer:

i Accuray Corporation

'

650 Ackerman Road i

P.O. Box 02248 Columbus, OH 43202 14.

Onsite inspection of gauge (s) (list observations / measurements):

$ Accuray supplied the following dates:

May 5, 1985; October 23, 1984; i

April 5, 1984 and October 26, 1983.

Test results on these dates were i

satisfactory according to Accuray Corporation.

During the last of several calls to Nichols Homeshield, Roger Peyton, l

Plant Engineer stated that the test records were not available at the

!

plant and stated further that Nichols Homeshield was attempting to get the records from Accuray Corporation, j

O

-

m

-

.

_

.

-.

_

.

...-. - _.

..

.

.

15.

Name of ORAU Reviewer

.! '

s eddy

/o-2 f~ff

.

Ricnard C. Ro'okard Date 16.

Signature and Date of NRC Reviewer

, -..

. )

./

.

,&N: " ^

/6~2f-ff

'

D: G.'Wiedeman

,

'

Date i

,

)

l

,

l

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000321/2009013&oldid=4090878"