ML20203D900: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:, | {{#Wiki_filter:, | ||
DuxE POWER GOMPANY | DuxE POWER GOMPANY P.O. BOX 33189 l | ||
July 8, 1986 | CHARLOTTE. N.C. 28242 TEL m ma i | ||
Operator Licensing Section U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cosstission, Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Was~aington, D.C. | HAL B. TUCKER (704)373-483 vice reserneN, NUCLEAR PROBOTTION July 8, 1986 l | ||
Operator Licensing Section U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cosstission, Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Was~aington, D.C. | |||
20555 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Catawba Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 SRO Upgrade Applications Dear Sir On July 1,1986, Duke Power Company substitted a group of operator license appli-cations for Catawba Units 1 and 2. Included in this package were applications to | Catawba Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 SRO Upgrade Applications Dear Sir On July 1,1986, Duke Power Company substitted a group of operator license appli-cations for Catawba Units 1 and 2. | ||
these experience requirements for Messrs Beaver and Ramseur will be submitted in the near future. This exemption would be consistent with the licensing bases for Catawba as these two gentlemen meet or exceed the experience requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.8 and ANSI N18.1-1971 as comitted in the Catawba FSAR and approved by the staff in the Catawba SER. As shown on Attachment 1, these two individuals have 7 1/2 years of experience on site at Catawba. During this time the applicants were actively involved in preoperational testing and checkout, startup testing and operator training. We conclude that their backgrounds and experience constitutes an acceptable alternative to the requirements of the Denton letter and ES-109. | Included in this package were applications to l | ||
upgrade seven Reactor Operator (RO) licenses to Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) i licenses. Two of the gentlemen involved, Messrs Beaver and Ramseur, do not meet the experience requirements of Operator Licensing Examiner Standard ES-109, Section C.1.a. | |||
The same experience requirements were contained in a {{letter dated|date=March 28, 1980|text=March 28, 1980 letter}} from H.R. Denton to all licensees. Reference to this letter was included in Sections 6.3 and 6.4 of the Catawba Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifi-cations. A change to the Technical Specifications to allow an exemption from these experience requirements for Messrs Beaver and Ramseur will be submitted in the near future. This exemption would be consistent with the licensing bases for Catawba as these two gentlemen meet or exceed the experience requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.8 and ANSI N18.1-1971 as comitted in the Catawba FSAR and approved by the staff in the Catawba SER. As shown on Attachment 1, these two individuals have 7 1/2 years of experience on site at Catawba. During this time the applicants were actively involved in preoperational testing and checkout, startup testing and operator training. We conclude that their backgrounds and experience constitutes an acceptable alternative to the requirements of the Denton letter and ES-109. | |||
It is therefore requested that NRC/ Region II waive the experience requirements of ES-109 for the two SRO applicants identified in Attachment I and administer the license examinations as scheduled. | It is therefore requested that NRC/ Region II waive the experience requirements of ES-109 for the two SRO applicants identified in Attachment I and administer the license examinations as scheduled. | ||
Very truly yours, Hal B. Tucker WLH/04/jgm Attachments 8607210381 860707 PDR | Very truly yours, Hal B. Tucker WLH/04/jgm Attachments 8607210381 860707 PDR ADOCK 05000413 p | ||
PDR | |||
Operator Licensing Section July 8, 1986 Page 2 xc: NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station Dr. K.N. Jabbour Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 l | Operator Licensing Section July 8, 1986 Page 2 xc: NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station Dr. K.N. Jabbour Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. | ||
20555 l | |||
g | |||
,y- | |||
,w-- | |||
y--,,---,--- | |||
e--n | |||
,-w w,v---}} | |||
Latest revision as of 01:31, 8 December 2024
| ML20203D900 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1986 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20203D893 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8607210381 | |
| Download: ML20203D900 (2) | |
Text
,
DuxE POWER GOMPANY P.O. BOX 33189 l
CHARLOTTE. N.C. 28242 TEL m ma i
HAL B. TUCKER (704)373-483 vice reserneN, NUCLEAR PROBOTTION July 8, 1986 l
Operator Licensing Section U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cosstission, Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Was~aington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Catawba Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 SRO Upgrade Applications Dear Sir On July 1,1986, Duke Power Company substitted a group of operator license appli-cations for Catawba Units 1 and 2.
Included in this package were applications to l
upgrade seven Reactor Operator (RO) licenses to Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) i licenses. Two of the gentlemen involved, Messrs Beaver and Ramseur, do not meet the experience requirements of Operator Licensing Examiner Standard ES-109, Section C.1.a.
The same experience requirements were contained in a March 28, 1980 letter from H.R. Denton to all licensees. Reference to this letter was included in Sections 6.3 and 6.4 of the Catawba Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifi-cations. A change to the Technical Specifications to allow an exemption from these experience requirements for Messrs Beaver and Ramseur will be submitted in the near future. This exemption would be consistent with the licensing bases for Catawba as these two gentlemen meet or exceed the experience requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.8 and ANSI N18.1-1971 as comitted in the Catawba FSAR and approved by the staff in the Catawba SER. As shown on Attachment 1, these two individuals have 7 1/2 years of experience on site at Catawba. During this time the applicants were actively involved in preoperational testing and checkout, startup testing and operator training. We conclude that their backgrounds and experience constitutes an acceptable alternative to the requirements of the Denton letter and ES-109.
It is therefore requested that NRC/ Region II waive the experience requirements of ES-109 for the two SRO applicants identified in Attachment I and administer the license examinations as scheduled.
Very truly yours, Hal B. Tucker WLH/04/jgm Attachments 8607210381 860707 PDR ADOCK 05000413 p
Operator Licensing Section July 8, 1986 Page 2 xc: NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station Dr. K.N. Jabbour Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 l
g
,y-
,w--
y--,,---,---
e--n
,-w w,v---