ML20202J558: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I
{{#Wiki_filter:I Page 1 of 2 cx EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS COWROWD C o
      .                                                                            Page 1 of 2 cx EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS o
CHANGE NOTICE: 001 R1_h o CONTROL No.
CHANGE NOTICE: 001     COWROWD C                        '
PROCEDURE NO.: CPP-010 REVISION NO.:
PROCEDURE NO.: CPP-010 CONTROL No.      R1_h o REVISION NO.:   7 ISSUE DATE: 05/15/86 (s
7 ISSUE DATE: 05/15/86 (s
b PREPARATION OF DEVIATION REPORTS The CPP identified above is hereby changed as shown on the attached page of this notice.
b PREPARATION OF DEVIATION REPORTS The CPP identified above is hereby changed as shown on the attached page of this notice.
l l
l l
i Prepared by:                                       Date:
i M!h Prepared by:
M!h Approved by:           ,    ,        /u' at:/S   Date:   .T!/F[6$
Date:
On-Site QA Representa ve Approved by:                   . . 1           Date:   f6%
.T!/F[6$
QA/p Review Team Lepder                       //
Approved by:
8607170104 860711 PDR
/u' at:/S Date:
                                ~
On-Site QA Representa ve Approved by:
ADOCK 05000445 PDR
1 Date:
f6%
QA/p Review Team Lepder
//
8607170104 860711
~
PDR ADOCK 05000445 PDR


      .      . I Changs Notica 001 CPP-010 73
I Changs Notica 001 CPP-010 73 i
  ;    i                                                                  Revision: 7 V'
Revision:
: 1. Delete the following portion of Section 4.4.3:
7 V'
                      , or an adverse trend analysis of the unclassified trend"
1.
: 2. Change the second sentence in the first paragraph of Section 5.2.2 to read:
Delete the following portion of Section 4.4.3:
                    "Second reviewers determine when a deviation or set of related deviations constitute an unclassified deviation."
", or an adverse trend analysis of the unclassified trend" 2.
: 3. Change Section 5.3.2, first paragraph, to read:
Change the second sentence in the first paragraph of Section 5.2.2 to read:
                          "The QA/QC Records Administrator normally transmits copies of valid DRs received from the second reviewer (refer to Paragraph 5.2.2) to:
"Second reviewers determine when a deviation or set of related deviations constitute an unclassified deviation."
                                    . the SSEG Supervisor for analyses,
3.
                                    . the CPSES QC Coordinator for further processing in accordance with Reference 3.3, and
Change Section 5.3.2, first paragraph, to read:
                                    , the QA/QC Interface Coordinator for action as required per Reference 3.5.
"The QA/QC Records Administrator normally transmits copies of valid DRs received from the second reviewer (refer to Paragraph 5.2.2) to:
g is,)                     Valid DRs in the following categories are also transmitted to tbs Project Manager, Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Reconciliation Project:
. the SSEG Supervisor for analyses,
LBCO       PIWM           LBSR       SBPS SBC0     PBFA           LBSN       PWRE Unclassified DRs and those reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are transmitted to the SSEG Supervisor for information only, as safety-significant evaluations for those DRs are unwarranted. DRs reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are also transmitted to the appropriate first I
. the CPSES QC Coordinator for further processing in accordance with Reference 3.3, and
, the QA/QC Interface Coordinator for action as required per Reference 3.5.
gis,)
Valid DRs in the following categories are also transmitted to tbs Project Manager, Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Reconciliation Project:
LBCO PIWM LBSR SBPS SBC0 PBFA LBSN PWRE Unclassified DRs and those reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are transmitted to the SSEG Supervisor for information only, as safety-significant evaluations for those DRs are unwarranted. DRs reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are also transmitted to the appropriate first I
reviewer for use in the collective evaluation."
reviewer for use in the collective evaluation."
I bs 2}}
I b s
2}}

Latest revision as of 02:14, 8 December 2024

Change Notice 001 to Rev 7 to Procedure CPP-010, Preparation of Deviation Repts
ML20202J558
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/1986
From: Bajada E
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20202J051 List: ... further results
References
CPP-010, CPP-10, NUDOCS 8607170104
Download: ML20202J558 (2)


Text

I Page 1 of 2 cx EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS COWROWD C o

CHANGE NOTICE: 001 R1_h o CONTROL No.

PROCEDURE NO.: CPP-010 REVISION NO.:

7 ISSUE DATE: 05/15/86 (s

b PREPARATION OF DEVIATION REPORTS The CPP identified above is hereby changed as shown on the attached page of this notice.

l l

i M!h Prepared by:

Date:

.T!/F[6$

Approved by:

/u' at:/S Date:

On-Site QA Representa ve Approved by:

1 Date:

f6%

QA/p Review Team Lepder

//

8607170104 860711

~

PDR ADOCK 05000445 PDR

I Changs Notica 001 CPP-010 73 i

Revision:

7 V'

1.

Delete the following portion of Section 4.4.3:

", or an adverse trend analysis of the unclassified trend" 2.

Change the second sentence in the first paragraph of Section 5.2.2 to read:

"Second reviewers determine when a deviation or set of related deviations constitute an unclassified deviation."

3.

Change Section 5.3.2, first paragraph, to read:

"The QA/QC Records Administrator normally transmits copies of valid DRs received from the second reviewer (refer to Paragraph 5.2.2) to:

. the SSEG Supervisor for analyses,

. the CPSES QC Coordinator for further processing in accordance with Reference 3.3, and

, the QA/QC Interface Coordinator for action as required per Reference 3.5.

gis,)

Valid DRs in the following categories are also transmitted to tbs Project Manager, Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Reconciliation Project:

LBCO PIWM LBSR SBPS SBC0 PBFA LBSN PWRE Unclassified DRs and those reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are transmitted to the SSEG Supervisor for information only, as safety-significant evaluations for those DRs are unwarranted. DRs reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are also transmitted to the appropriate first I

reviewer for use in the collective evaluation."

I b s

2