ML20205D673

Forwards Draft Commission Paper Re Facility Restart, Including More Expansive Discussion of Procedural Issues Involved than Presented in SECY-84-360,Miller & Chevalier Memo & State of CA Puc 840502 Interim Opinion.W/O Encls

ML20205D673
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	10/04/1984
From:	Cunningham G NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:	Cutchin J, Davis P, Reamer W NRC
Shared Package
ML20205D636	List: IA-84-885, Advises That Commissioners Roberts & Zech Do Not Believe ACRS Technical Review Required Prior to Restart Decision.No Comments Offered by Commissioner Bernthal.Comments Encl.W/O Encl ML20205D630 ML20205D656 ML20205D673 ML20205D698 ML20205D707 ML20205D729 ML20205D734 ML20205D741 ML20205D768 ML20205D801 ML20205D819
References
FOIA-84-885 NUDOCS 8510170062
Download: ML20205D673 (1)

Text

h, k

p aa.g SECRlTARIAT Rf mc w(

NUCLEAR RE U RY COMMi&.ON

", 't -

WASHING TON. D. C. 20555

\\' %) J October 4, 1984 NOTE TO: William Reamer James Cutchin Patricia Davis Stephen Sohinki William Parler FROM:

Guy H. Cunningham, III, Executive Legal Director

SUBJECT:

SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 RESTART Attached for your infortnation is a copy of the draft version of the Comis-sion Paper regarding San Onofre Unit 1 Restart which contains a more expansive discussion of the procedural issues involved than is presented in SECY-84 V n Also, attached are (1) a copy of the memorandum from the licensees' attorneys, Miller & Chevalier, presenting their analysis and position on restart and (2) a copy of the California PUC's Interim Opinion issued on May 2,1984.

We are currently analyzing the Miller & Chevalier memorandum.

4 Guy H. Cunnin [ III, Executive Legal Director cc:

H. Plaine i

I f.0,.,'

~D f

8510170062 850926 N

PDR FOIA

/

r BELLB4-885 PDR H

-