ML20205D768: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IA-84-885, Advises That Commissioners Roberts & Zech Do Not Believe ACRS Technical Review Required Prior to Restart Decision.No Comments Offered by Commissioner Bernthal.Comments Encl.W/O Encl]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20205D768
| issue date = 11/16/1984
| title = Advises That Commissioners Roberts & Zech Do Not Believe ACRS Technical Review Required Prior to Restart Decision.No Comments Offered by Commissioner Bernthal.Comments Encl.W/O Encl
| author name = Chilk S
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
| addressee name = Palladino
| addressee affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
| docket = 05000206
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = FOIA-84-885
| document report number = NUDOCS 8510170086
| package number = ML20205D636
| document type = INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM, MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:f "f
4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY CON SSION g
w AsHiN oTCN, D.C. 20555
,7 e.y OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY November 16, 1984 COMNP-84-4.7
(
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Chairman Palladinc FROM:
Samuel J. Chilk, Secretar b
I SAN ONOFRE, UNIT 1 -- NEEE FdR ACRS
 
==SUBJECT:==
TECHNICAL VIEWS (COMNP-84-(47)
At your request, Commissioners have been polled on whether or not they wish to have ACRS technical views before a restart decision for San Onofre, Unit 1.
Commissioners Roberts and Zech have responded in the negative.
Commissioner Bernthal's comments are attached.
Commissioner Asselstine replies that he had 60- preference in the matter.
This completes action on COMNP-84-47.
~
cc:
Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech W. Dircks, EDO ACRS I
7 D
8510170086 850926 PDR FOIA BELL 84-885 PDR hl
,}}

Latest revision as of 18:55, 7 December 2024

Advises That Commissioners Roberts & Zech Do Not Believe ACRS Technical Review Required Prior to Restart Decision.No Comments Offered by Commissioner Bernthal.Comments Encl.W/O Encl
ML20205D768
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/1984
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Palladino
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20205D636 List:
References
FOIA-84-885 NUDOCS 8510170086
Download: ML20205D768 (1)


Text

f "f

4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY CON SSION g

w AsHiN oTCN, D.C. 20555

,7 e.y OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY November 16, 1984 COMNP-84-4.7

(

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Chairman Palladinc FROM:

Samuel J. Chilk, Secretar b

I SAN ONOFRE, UNIT 1 -- NEEE FdR ACRS

SUBJECT:

TECHNICAL VIEWS (COMNP-84-(47)

At your request, Commissioners have been polled on whether or not they wish to have ACRS technical views before a restart decision for San Onofre, Unit 1.

Commissioners Roberts and Zech have responded in the negative.

Commissioner Bernthal's comments are attached.

Commissioner Asselstine replies that he had 60- preference in the matter.

This completes action on COMNP-84-47.

~

cc:

Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech W. Dircks, EDO ACRS I

7 D

8510170086 850926 PDR FOIA BELL 84-885 PDR hl

,