ML20202A997

Rev 6 to CP-QAP-17.1, Corrective Action. Related Info Encl

ML20202A997
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	03/01/1984
From:	Morris G BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML18052B537	List: IR 05000445/1979026 IR 05000445/1980015 ML20199M024 ML20199M047 ML20199M072 ML20199M087 ML20199M099 ML20202A685 ML20202A693 ML20202A708 ML20202A712 ML20202A726 ML20202A765 ML20202A776 ML20202A785 ML20202A801 ML20202A812 ML20202A832 ML20202A837 ML20202A854 ML20202A860 ML20202A873 ML20202A877 ML20202A896 ML20202A902 ML20202A927 ML20202A934 ML20202A946 ML20202A953 ML20202A967 ML20202A973 ML20202A980 ML20202A988 ML20202A997 ML20202B002 ML20202B023 ML20202B029 ML20202B042 ML20202B046 ML20202B051 ML20202B062 ML20202B070 ML20202B076 ML20202B087 ML20202B095 ML20202B105 ML20202B111 ML20202B116 ML20202B129 ML20202B133 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 CP-QAP-17.1, NUDOCS 8607100171
Download: ML20202A997 (26)

Text

.

o BROWN 1 RCOT, INC.

ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION CATE PAGE JCS 35-119E CP-QAP-17.1 6

MAR 011984 1 of 7 TITLE:

ORIGINATOR: M OM

/9b T4 CATE

/4 J.

er/

CORRECTIVE ACTION REVIEWED BY:

d!d7 APPROVED BY:

/

Site QA Manager v OATE

1.0 REFERENCES

og $FORg G0%OHL None 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE To provide a systematic method to ensure that condi tions which are adverse to quality are promptly identi fi ed,

evaluated and reported to the appropriate personnel in order that the causes of these conditions are corrected, and corrective action to preclude recurrence is implemented.

2.2 SCOPE Thi s procedure encompasses all Safety Class 1, 2 and 3 l construction activities which are reported as unacceptable,

defici ent, or nonconforming that may requi re corrective action whether identi fied by individuals wi thi n the depa rtment or by external age nci es, such as customers or regulatory bodies.

2.3 RESPONSIBILITY The Site QA Manager shall ensure implementation of thi s procedure which provides the mechanism for initiating and maintaining visibility of corrective actions until they are completed.

3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 REVIEW 0F UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS Unsatisfactory conditions may be identi fi ed at any time; e.g., through regularly scheduled internal audits, external

audits, supplier audi ts,

surveillance activi ti es, nonconfomances, or during the nomal course of business operations.

l

~

8607100171 860630 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR

SROWN & ROOT, INC.

ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE l

MAR 01 h

~

2 of 7 CP-QAP-17.1 6

The Quality Engineering Group (QEG) Supervisor shall review the following documents which denote unacceptable conditions:

a.

Nonconfomance Reports (CP-QAP-16.1);

b.

Design Change Authorizations (CP-QAP-.i.1);

c.

Component Modi fication Cards (CP-QAP-4.1);

d.

Base / Weld Metal Inspection Reports (CP-QAP-16.1).

e.

Unsat Inspection Reports (CP-QAP-16.1).

This review shall be done at least quarterly and shall evaluate conditions which may require corrective action.

3.1.1 Reoorting The means of reporting the need for corrective actions can vary from memos, to letters, to corrective action requests, to fomal reports; but rega rdless of the manner of identi fication it is necessary that corrective actions are taken and followed-up to assure that they are effective in correcting and preventing recurrence of the program, s

l Upon completion of the review, the QE Group Supervisor shall I

submit a report to the Site QA Manager indicating:

l Results of review, utilizing tr'end analysis techniques, a.

where applicable; and b.

Recommendations for corrective actions, as applicable; 1.

Memos and/or letters of concern are used to l

identi fy condi tions which if not corrected may develop into CAR deficiencies and are directed to I

the responsible ma nage r.

Memos and letters will contain the following minimum i nformation:

a)

Action designee b)

Description of the problem c)

Commi tted action to correct the condition 2.

Corrective Action Request per Paragraph 3.2.1.

SROWN & ROOT, INC.

ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 '

MAR 011984l CP-QAP-17.1 6

3 of 7 3.2 CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS 3.2.1 Initiation If adverse conditions exi st as identified in the report l

described in Paragraph 3.1.1, the Site QA Manager may initiate a Corrective Action Request (CAR, Attachment 1).

The Site QA Manager shall assign the CAR to an "Acti on Addressee" and forward the CAR to QEG for distribution.

l The Site QA Manager, upon identi fication of a single condition which is significantly adverse to quality shall initiate a CAR at the time the condition is identified.

I 3.2.2 Distribution Upon receipt, QEG shall assign a number and enter the CAR l

into the CAR Log (Attachment 2).

A copy of the CAR shall then be forwarded to the " Action Addressee" and copies sent to:

a.

Construction Project Manager; j

i b.

Brown & Root QA Manager; l

c.

Owner's Managers of Engineering and Construction; I

d.

Owner's QA Manager; e.

Owner's Site QA Supervi sor; I

i f.

The ANI; and g.

The QE Group Supervisor.

3.2.3 Corrective Action Response i

The

" Action Addressee" shall canplete the appropriate j

section of the CAR by identifying the cause of the condition and shall propose corrective action requi red to preclude i

recurrence and establish a committment date for completion of corrective action.

The " Action Addressee" shall then return the CAR to the QE Group Supervisor for subsequent evaluation.

i d

SROWN & ROOT, INC.

ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE

~

4 f7 CP-QAP-17.1 6

M '0 TIM 4 3.2.4 Evaluation of Response Upon receipt of the corrective action response, the QE Group Supervisor shall evaluate the response for acceptability.

If acceptable, he shall notify the " Action Addressee" by memo indicating an acceptable response.

Should the corrective action response be unsatisfactory, the QE Group Supervisor shall obtain a satisfactory response from the

" Action Addressee".

If a resolution cannot be agreed upon, the QE Group Supervi sor shall noti fy the Site QA Manager do shall initiate a Stop Work Order (SWO) in accordance with CP-QAP-17.2.

The Site QA Manager shall advi se the Brown & Root QA Manager, by interoffice memo with a copy of the SWO, who will then coordinate obtaining a satisfactory resolution at appropriate levels of management.

3.2.5 Verification of Corrective Action The Construction Project Manager is responsible fo r providing satisfactory corrective action.

The QE Group Supervi sor shall conduct a

fol low-up investigation within 10 days after the commi tt ed i

implementation date to ensare that the required' corrective action has been cmpleted.

If corrective action has been cmpleted, the QE Group Supervi sor shall sign the CAR verifying that corrective action is emplete and forward the CAR to the Site QA l

Manager for formal closure.

If corrective action is incomplete the QE Group Supervisor shall notify the Site QA Manager who shall initiate a SWO in accordance with CP-QAP-17.2 and di stributed per Paragrpah 3.2.2.

Work may be resumed only after documented approval from the Site QA Manager.

3.2.6 CAR Revision CAR's may be revised at any time, after issuance and prior to closure, for the following reasons a.

Clarity of terms, conditions, and dispositions; i

b.

Additional descriptive infomation; and/or c.

Change in di sposition respor.-ibility.

SROWN & ROOT, INC.

ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE

~

CP-QAP-17.1 6

6 #7 MAR 01198 l

When a CAR requires revision, it shall be identified with i

the letter "R"

immediately following the CAR number and a sequential number indicating the level of the revi sion.

The reason for the revision and the individual initiating the revision shall be stated on the CAR.

CAR revisions shall be initiated by the same organization that performed the original preparation providing they have signatu re authority.

CAR revisions shall receive the same review and approval cycle as the original CAR. QEG shall maintain the original CAR.

3.2.7 Voiding a CAR The Site QA Manager, during processing, may disposition a l

CAR to state "Not a CAR Condition" or similar wording.

He shall provide justification for such disposition on the CAR, and shall sign for closure.

When a CAR is :lispositioned in this manner, the original is forwarded to Q:G with a copy l

to ANI.

3.2.8 Formal Closure After implementation of the corrective action has been veri fied by the QE Group Supervisor, the Site QA Manager shall close the CAR by signing and dating the "QA Review /

Closure" portion of the CAR. The CAR shall be forwarded to QEG for distribution.

3.2.9 Distribution of Closed CAR QEG shall update the CAR Log and di stribute copies cf the closed CAR to personnel indicated in Section 3.2.2.

I The CAR origi nal shall be transmi tted to the Owner in accordance with CP-QAP-18.1.

l l

{

~

l

_ _ _ -. =. -,,

<~

SRCW4 & RC07. INC.

ISSUE CPSE3 mG REllSICM CATE PAGE NN

~

CP-CAP-17.1 6

6 of.7 ATIAGMEITI 1 ErewnCFect.'re-w mm:wamnr

==luestl"""v1 aC""Ch *F 43*

79'*1'

- ' A*1

-egT1

,a g g

ijaa W**

aue.me w 4

W----

^

asum*** ams*****

e P

• • M N s

..- a

.. a a.

Lg estat M &itw s "44a w e u==espee A :.=

Was e a

ms.,

• ?

I

.e

.-==..-e to **wes em ev i

I

~

I ISSUE 3ROWN 1 RCOT, INC.

CPSE3 NUM8ER REVISICN CATE PAGE Jes as-uss i

7 f7

1. AR 011W N 17.1 6

ATDCSMEfr 2 4

3 3

II l

i

.i I,

• 5.

I l

Ii 1.3 E

(

3

$$3 n2 I

t E

. *[

2e s

I~

I k $$

• 12 3

C.

]

.O s.3 i.

z

1. ~{

<a

=

e-

1 l,

1 2

1 C :}

Ew a

s 1

2 I

I I

)

l i

i s:

I is c

t' g

i; i.

s L

ye il 121 I

I I

I I!

I i

i I

i i

I i

ti h,

-~~-.--

e S

w

)

TEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES INC.

CPP-15,313 OFFICE MEMOR ANDUM To All Building Managers Glen Rose. Texas March-2, 1984 up CDMANCBE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATICN ADMINISTRATIVE GJIDELINE FOR ' DIE BUIIDDG MANAGDiENT ORGANIZATICNS REFERENCE 1) CPP-14,690-ATIACHED Site quality assurance has empleted a surveillance activity of the status of inspection and nonconformance reports associated with the cable sprea:1 room. 'Ibe surveillance did not include irs for electrical separation or post-construction verification deficiency reports. 'Ihe surveillance a::tivity concluded over 50 reports were ineerly statused in the Master Data Base (MDB).

'Ibe activities of, the Building Management Groups are prescribed in the subject guideline issued per Reference 1.

Use of the Master Data Base is described as the source document for information. Proper maintenance of the Mm is essential.

Please pcoceed with the following for eac!) interfacing group in the respective buildirg groups.

1) Re-instruct and errphasize the in:portance of implementing the established reporting systems properly ard in a timely manner, and

2) Review the guideline for possible revision to note clearly state the duties and responsibilities required to accmplish item 1.

Eacf1 organization is eMed to discuss any proposals with Fred G. Burgess.

O C/

A(sLstantProjetGeneral.

l M. T.

ritt

(

ager JIN/RPB/and

~

cc:

G. B. Crane l

B. J. Murray j

6 F. L. Powers 2 A. Dittmar L C. Frankum F. G. Tolson L G. Burgess 68de

.1XAS UTILITIES SERVICES II)

CFF-14690

' OTTICE MEMOR ANDUM Distribution Glen Rome. Texa De cembe r 9.

1983 To COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Subject

SUBJECT:

ADMINISTRATIVE CUIDELINES FOR THE BUILDINC MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS The attached guidelines are submitted for your implementation. These' guidelines provide criteria for the basic organization and operation of the Building Management Orgainzations (attachment 1) and criteria for input to the Master Data Base (attachment 2).

While these guidelines are general enough to allow you flexibility to conduct your day to day activities, the programatic details shall not be deviated from.

If revisions are required, notify me and I'll evaluate your request and take the appropriate action. Otherwise, I expect each building organization to be in compliance with these guidelines.

t 0

/2.

"*=1 r-

~ /f t.ECEIVED JTM/JPC/th DEC 131983 i

Texas Utilmes Services' I I

cc: Cene Crant l

B.J. Murra..

CPSES Const. Office John Finneran

')

D.C. Frankum Fred Burgess R.C. Tolson John Dittmar Burgess

._ayge

'.,1erritt Norman l uit

. Johnson i

1 :cBay-I POPPlewell 4

! alder l Creamer

• 'A e m Kissinger i itrange Finneran Robaugh Murray'

svis titxs i R. Baker 3 entry 1 mi.

~

t t

t

)

i e

i t-d.

l n

Deceiber 10, 1983

- )

ACPCNISTRATIVE GUIDEI. DES IIR THE BUILDDG mat 0GDENT ORGANIZATICNS i

i 1.0 INDGUCTICE D ese ?' W 14nes provide a generic description and general gudelines for the organization ard operaticm of the Building Management Organizations (3 0) for those areas designated by Project General Management (P!G). An organizational chart for*this organizaticn is shown in Atta& ment 1.

2.0 IESCRIPTICN 2.1 General 2 e Building Management Organizations (BPC) were established to nake the most efficient use of project resources. Se BPC's consist of representa-tives selected frtan the Engineering, Cbnstruction, ard QA ceganizations Qc are responsiSle for ;+' - Ang these activities. Se Engineering ard craft personnel support the h'41d45 managers to dem they are assigned for routine sdeduling and work assignments; however, the 4 As. super-visors are responsible for the tednical direction of these personnel.

G: mi report to the applicable QA department manager. Additionally, each so mr*=ina a paper flow group (PfG) which is respcmsible for obemining, preparing,===anh1ing, routing, and/or tracking the 6-=nts necessary to perform tasks in accordance with the established, evd 3

project procedures. Sese 6-nts include drawings, design dange doctaments, Rxza Work Notifications (NE), Start-up R:ck Authorizations (SWA), Inspected Item Renoval Notices (IEN), travelers, etc. A brief description of the flow for each M-st is 1:rovided in pt.cWi 3.0.

2.2 Respcmsibilities End NO will be a self-sufficient organization and will be responsible l

dar per*=45 we:k in accordana with the applicable construction, engineering, and QA Iroject re ures. Design ard QA/QC h= ants will be initiated by the personnel in the respect.ive groups and tha== W==nts handled in accordance with the discipline's W1-nting procedures. 2e paper flow groups are. responsible for amtralizing ard controlling all necessary dxumentation for a specific construction activitiy 16 -lesignated areas of the plant.

3.0 IEPER IIIN GiCDP (PfG)

De PfG is wdible for preparing or obtaining, assedling, routing, tradting, and reviewing the 6-nts required to perfecn a task. Se same person say perfacm me or more of the f.nlowing functions.

l

]

.I 4P m

.~

y

., S _ _......

a Decenber 10, 1983 Page 2 I

ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES IGR THE BUIIDDG MA.N ORWGZATICNS ;

3.1 PfG CDORDINA20R

'me PfG Cbordirator (Atts.l it 2) receives and reviews dacuments, Inspection Reports (IR), Nmoonformance %s (NCR), Design Change Authorizations (DCA), C went M:dification cards (CMC), etc., to determir.a what wcdc is required. After review the coordinator routes i

the h==nts to the appropriate PfG==wher for logging ard statusing.

Work es are namnbled and L.-Meted to the.wmiate grote for

action, the transmittal statused en the Master Data Base (MEB).

Upon craqpletim of the work, the -4 is returned to the W_inator for logging and closure. 'me anordinator updates the MtB status ard submits the closed W_v to the Permanent, Plant Becords vault,(PPRV).

3.2 PCB CDORDINA2CR

'ihe MDB coordinator is respcrisible for maintaining a a:rrent e=Mm af.. '

open items in the MDB. '!be coordinator receives input fran the PfG Leader cr PfG WLnator, verifies the input is ret already in the EB, ~-

ard inputs the item referencing the aEplicable supporting doe.nnents.

'!be c:ctdinator updates the status as input is received.

3. 3-DESIN CHAN3E DEFICIENCY CIDRDINATOR

~

'!he coordinator will unintain a status of all deficient DCA's and OC's by W1Mng, elevaticri, ard rocza. 'me coordinator will reviet all.

.~

available doc'.xnentation to determine if the doc'.anentation exists diicts

~

will resolve the deficiency. If the h==ntatim is not found, the coordinator identifies the need for a reverificaticri of the item by CE. If the reverification is "unsat" ard requires additional work, the ew 9inato: afvises the PEG Cbordinator who asser:t)les a work package as described in pa6, api 3.1.

If the reverificaticri is " sat",

the closed IR is subnitted to the PPRV ard the item closed.

3.4 TBAVELER IT.m 3.4.1 Cbnduit Traveler Flow When the raceway is crzrpleted, the coordinator transmits the racewey to QC.

If satisfactory, CA prepeces an IR and subnits it to the asordinator who subnits a copy to the craft. '!he a:ordinator advises the PfG ccordinator of "unsat" conditions ard work padcages are yuw" in accor.*.ance with par %u413.1.

)

9 l

T___

d

~

' Docuser 10, 1983

-).

Page 3 ACHINISn%"IVE GUIDELINES ICR 'ISE BUIIDDG MA20GDENT OIGANIZATICHS 3.4.2 Electrical and Civil Traveler Flow De coordinator receives the traveler, logs it, obtains all sugporting docunentation arx! assembles the wxk package, arx! i=- the package

. to the craft. After the primary craft work is a:xrplete, the-Wtnator coordinates the remaining work with the responsible deFiu.M. 2e coordinator statuses, logs, and transmits ccanpleted travelers along with their sat IR's to the PPRV.

3.4.3 Cable Tray Banger cc Cable Tray Traveler Flow

':he coordinata prepares the t aveler when requestal by the craft. Se coordinator assenbles the package with the applicable drawings aid other required docunentation and sutznits the =% to the craft fot work.. Se craft-ecaplete package is returned to the coordinator so transmits it to-QC fer inspection. Se coupleted packages are returned to the Whator l

to transmits then to the Permanent Plant Records Vault (PPRV).

3.5 BISCD CCORDINATICN te coordinator will be wsible~ for establishing arri =4e=4ning a. -

I status of penetrations requiring penetration or radiation seals.

3.5.1 Penetration Seals (Mechanical and Instrumentation) 2e coordinator will prepare an IR listing the seals by trace and room -

rumhe whic 1 are to be worked. Se IR is sent to the Proch.-

A. Management.

Group (PPG) who initiates rework or sealing of the penetration, as w uriate.. Se ccordinator advises the MDB of the status.

3.5.2 Radiation Seals After the penetrations are released frcan PPG for sealing, the coordinator will initiate and route the seal release. After the release signatures are received, the PtG will authorize BISCD to install the seals. me.

coordinatz advises the MDB of the status.

3.5.3 Seal Bemoval If a seal has to be renoved, the crordinator will be presented with an IPN prepared by the craft and review it for accuracy. Se coordinator will decide who will renove the seal arx! so state cn the IPN prior to signing it. Se coordinator will forward cogies of the IRN arx! the Penetration Seal Renoval Request to QC and BISCO.

I i

t l

g

~/

s/

e Decarber 10, 1983 i-Page 4 AMINISIFATIVE CUmTNES EUR E BUIIDDG MANAGEMENT CEANIIATICNS 3.6 ERPGAG CCORDINATICN De coordinator issues and tacks the release form and inputs the release to the MDB. De coordinator performs researd and obtains signa *m whicf1 indicate that all known work is completed. Se a:crdinator then notifies the Paint Department so the Bernelag may be a; plied. Upcn crupletion of the application, the Paint Department transmits the applicaticn doenentaticn to the coordinator fx review ard transmittal tc the PPW, and input of the status to the MDB.

3.7 SE FIN

~ '

he coordinator will be informed of the need for an S E by being presented a work item (e.g., CMC, NCR, etc.) Se coordinator will

====hle the h==nts necessar'f to complete the work item, prepare a SE (see At*=r%=nt 3 fce ficw chart), present the package to ~ Start-up for numbering, and dispositioning (authorization hold or rejection),

and advise the M2 of the Sa dispositicn and SE number. De coordinator win present ASME-related Sa's for signature to the QC Milding Supervisor res:ensible for N-5 coerations prior to wrk being performed. S e coordina*m will retain the crig Sm

~

~

aM submit a copf ard the work package to the craft. Up:n returri of the crxtpleted wrk package the coordinator will inscre that an.

the work items have been accepted with an inscacticn report. Se SE will be signed off in the PEG and returned to Start-up; '2e ermiinator win advise the MtB of the status.

3.8 IPN CZEDINATICN

~~

Se coordinator will repare an IPN based en a request or a wrk package.

I 1be coordinator will assign a r* to ard log the IPN, obtain the me::rgsible craft superintendent's ard CC signatures, ard subtit a ccpy to the PPW. Copies will be filed in the work pa cr with the NG. Opcn cccpletion of the work, the IPN log ard MDB be statused as explete.

3.9

% ULT IEFICIENCY CECRDINT4"ICN Se PPW will retify the crordinator of PPW docnentation deficiencies.

Se coordinator win review an logs, card files, ard other decanentation murces to determine if cbcumentation exists to resolve the deficiency.

If ro sucf2 documentaticn exists, the coordinator win request QC.-

reverification, and subnit the resulting IR to the FPW.

)

3 3

._ s' J

DW 10,1983 i

Page 5

' I-AIMINIhn%TIVE GUIDELDES ftR THE BUIIDDG MANCEMENT OR3NIZATICNS' 3.10 INSPECTION REPGT CDCEDINATICN,

The IR coordinator is mgsible for receipt, ruber assignment,. logging,. -

routing, and rtview of IR's, (See Attac iment 4 for* flow cfart). -

3.11 NCR CDORDINATICE The NCR Coordinator is responsible for receipc, logging, routing, and e are..

review of NCR;s in W with the ag:0.icable (A program's r

-(See Attacfunent 5 for flow cfiart).

e O

e ee O

9 6

e e

e e

e O O 4

e

\\

o O

,.,7

)

d G,g,

\\gg

-.---.-i ji i

i 1

I s

l I

l i

w g

g E

- 3 3 5 s 11 i-i t_

u2 I

,i

-1 E

e I ! ll!!

@N 5

5 I j SE),

j$1 53

~

4 e

d gt il r-W g

!g EI lo sk EE e-B

-s 1;i

-:s Eg s

~

}

s. )

F v

5

)

ki W

6 f.

g t

1 I

i ul l

I

$e F

0 E

an a

go

')

I_

q 5

e.

g gw

~E E

E h.

E I

N 6B Ei s.

4 O

j I

P

""3

e j

.s e

s e

suaem_

E a

l G: 18.

IEI II I$

lit 1.g Eg

~~~

1,

• a 5

E@j lgs v

l!aEll ~h N

g

=

n e

~

a 5,

g "p

I I

li

((.

g te %

rgg j

jgg g

~~

lg Pl a~i

~j l'

i s

ii

[2 i

k E

R E

g 5

!I a

l I

Il!'

1 E!

1n l

l

.I i

8 M

~ )

j 11 =h*5lj k

!,e E-

)

=

2!"

Id w-Eh Io ss*i il

'e iI gt ti I"

gl..g

!l i

I E

g g 5, a

3 n

a i

.l*-l g

l E

i m -E l

l-i p

i z

a g

j 5

i E

I i

e i

D

'1

, )

T a

.)

)

e 4

Ge 6 D

5-BE e.

SBR y

=

w

t e

s 2,3 o

n a

g:

,la!

9 :

=u l.

a1 s

2-e e.

s 2

n e.

E

$=

M gg m

[ n$

k-i si

~

}:

I :

I

==

=

r

=3 g

a

=.

2

=

2 g

=

=

Ge

,a 1

Eg n

z

.=

=

g j

3 u

B l

a o

5 m

eme.

O i

e G

O' Om e

mm

)

3 3

.._e

-e

- ?.. ' '

.R.M.r. 4~.nrend 2 l

' '/

MDB Guidalinss-Revision 1 Page 1 of 7 Master Data Base (MDB) Guidelines

.)

1.0 Introduction t

The MDB is intended to provide all project organizations and groups a.

convenient and integrated means of identifying, coordinating and. progress' tracking outstanding work items on. systems, components and structures.

It should be emphasized that all groups must participate in the punchlist*

mechanics; 1.e..

adding, removing or changing the status of an item; andI therefore, the following guidelines must be followed to ensure that the MDB'is an accurate document. Timely completion of the work items vill preclude this

-~

~~~~

punchlist from becoming unvieldly.

t 2.0 MDB Operation Guidelines in accordan'ce with the attached standard input 2.1 All items must be input I

fora.

~

l NOTE:

Standard input form is shown as Attachment 1.

Copies may be I

j obtained from the Completions Group. _

,e i

2.2 Additions or modifications to the basic MDB computer program must bei reviewed and approved by the Startup Manager and Construction Manager' prior to implementation of program changes.

t i

NOTE:,MDB printout headings are described by A.trachment.2..._.

J

)

)

2.3 All requests for computerized list programs must be reviewed and approv'de j

by the Startup Manager and Construction Manager prior to progra==ing '

activity being authorized.

1 2.4 The following types of items should be listed against the applicable '

j building subsystem number (89.00 series) as the " Primary Subsystem"'and the

. subsystem affected by the item, if any, should be listed in the "Special" column.

a.

Structural

?

b.

Paine c.

Pipe Supports d.

Conduit Supports e.

Raceway (tray and conduit) f.

Insulation

)

3 Firevrap h.

Penetration Seals

i. I.ighting EXAMPI.E i

.m, m.

,_, m u,,

i.efsn.$$@@!IF.! 5 ' "i... :..

li.e:

e

.i......

._..,....,....,,i.

1

e. v.

.u muu._.

i

}

..r@

..u...

.....m.

--,.'#.,.:n.:.::,'.:.;*.E... '..r '.;." ". -

.. "..r,...

l

~....n.

1

J MDB Cuidelines' Revision 1 Page 2 of 7

)

2.5 The following types of items should be listed against the applicable subsystem number as the Primary Subsystem with the plant elevation, room j

and building number listed in.che " Location" column.

a.

Piping - including velded attachments b.

Cable c.

Equipment d.

Valve e.

Instrument 2.6 All internal group punchlists that. require action (:i) by other proj ect groups must be entered on the MDB.

The MDB should not reference othei-work lists.

The contents of these work lists should be entered on the MDB.

i 2.7 As a minimum, each punchlist item should identify the problem, affecte'd equipment / component by number, related documents if any, subsystem, and location by building, room and elevation in the plant and a brief i

description of the problem.

?

2.8 Multiple problems should not be listed as a single item.

}

Those items affecting a subsystem that has been turned over and require.-

2.9 s

j physical work to clear the item must be postscripted as "S."

2.10 As a minir.im, the following items should be input to the MDB:

a.

NCR's (Excluding those handled by Hanger Task Force and those affecting items in warehouse) b.

TDR's c.

TDCR's d.

TUCCO valkdown items e.

Completions' group valkdown items f.

Startup valkdown items g.

Wald Engineering deficiencies h.

SWA's (on-hold or older than 3 weeks) i.

Non-ASME QC punch 11st J.

ASME QC punch 11st k.

Engineering separation punchlists 1.

QA document deficiency lists 8

1 m.

FDSG valkdown items 8

l n.

Area Management walkdown items l

8 8

l 1

i t

i

}

I l

f f

i 1

• ~~

l...

1 r

i

\\

EB Guidalinzs Revision 1 Page 3 of 7

)

2.11 All input from various site groups should be processed through one of the following groups for review prior to input to the CB.

1.

Paper flow group for applicable building manager a.

Reactor Building b.

Auxiliary Building c.

Electrical-Control Building d.

Safeguard Building 2.

Startup Completions Group 2.12 The following groups should forward inputs to the applicable Building Management paper flow group:

Engine'ering a.

b.

Construction c.

Non-ASME QC 1

2.13 The following group should forward input to Startup-TUGCO Operations

')

2.14 The following group should forward input to ASME QC:

k' eld Engineering 2.15 The Building Managemeht. Startup, completions and ASME 'QC groups must.

review all MDB input as follows; e

.a.

Revie.v input for formac. compliance i

b.

Est_ mate assignment of responsibility c.

Determine turnover status d.

Screen for duplication e.

Assure that item description is clear Review for correct system / subsystem assignment NOTW Items not meeting review criteria should be returned to originator for correction, clarification, etc.

2.16 The current practice of verifying the completion of physical verk on.

turned over components (i.e., postscripted with "S") by the Startup 3 Support Group or System Test Engineer prior to item closure on the MDB should continue.

1 This same practice is advisable and should be applied as deened necessary by each applicable Building Management group.

i f

1

)

I t

I e

n

=._

y O

i H

{

n. g S

'.. 4 R

K t

. Mg e

S E

A

~

4 Y

M g

< a E

i ng R

R E

V O

EP D

Tu E

Ao N

DC R

6 U

T T

A l

T i

N P

EN q D,

O ANP A

P 4OS M

ECE RER O

P3 M

C R

D E

O TC F

E L

F A

9 T

F IC A

E U

P P

S s

N t Y aTme I

u I

m e E

up

)

T s

ll S

E a

l h

i ll A

l O

A Cl D

K W

A C

n T

A E

t T

l N

i A

C 0n A

u

(

l l

D n

A s

Co R'

Opt 6

E Ls T

E G

S N

A A

l M

i 9

C S

U tx T

d l

E A

O T

I S

T P

I R

C S

M E

E D

T I

1 W

T E

N N

E M

U nE E C

OM P O

T A Y D

Al T

l e

/.

t i T T

GP U e e I

E P

H C

N O M D

I

[E

{I I

(yI 44 k

l l

I

'l

l t ! '.

MDB Cuicelinas.

• I.

ATTACTE.NT 2 R".vician 1 g

... /

Pega 5 of 7 LEGEND FOR MASTER DATA BASE INPUT FORM

. )

ITEM NO.

?

Sequential number as items are added to Data Base DOCUMENT / DESCRIPTION Reference documents, Component identification number and brief description of problem.

LOCATION Building T/0 No., Room No., Elevation SWA NO./ STATUS.

l Assigned SWA No.

Status = A= Authorized H=0n Hold

• = Work Complete In Retest, l

i

• • =SWA Closed t

)

i START-UP NEED DATE/ PRIORITY l

I Date needed to support scheduled start-up activities.

Priority I - Needs immediate attention Priority II-Testing interferances that are not Priority I I

SPECIAL Column designated to flag Generic Items i.e. (SEP) Separation Problems, (STA 802) Items to be cleared prior to Final Acceptance by Owner, etc.

and secondary Subsystems affected by item.

REOUISITION INFORMATION

.I Field Requisition No.

Purchase Order No.

I Supplement No.

8 Expected Ship Date/ Actual Ship Date 1

I, PRIMARY / SECONDARY RESPONSIBflITY t

List of Departments"in descending order which have some responsibility I

in satisfactorily completing and closing out item.

I I

'J l

k MDB Cuide11nes Revision 1 Page 6 of 7 i

ACPSI = ALLIS CHALMERS POWER SYSTD'.S. INC.

^

AM = AREA MANAGER BSC = BAHNSON SERVICE COMPANY CE = TUSI CIVIL ENGINEERING CM = COMPLETIONS MANAGER CS = CIVIL SUPERINTENDENT CSB = CIVIL SUPERINTENDENT BUILDING CSI = CIVIL SUPERINTENDENT IRON CSL = CIVIL SLPERINTENDENT LABOR CSP = CIVIL SUPERINTENDENT PAINT DFT.= DRAFTING DRG = DESIGN REVIEW GROUP DSG = DAMAGE STUDY GROUP EE = TUSI ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING ES = ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDENT ETG = ELECTRICAL TEST GROUP CFPS = GRINNELL FIRE PROTECTIONS SYSTEMS l

HELB = HANGER ENGINEERING LARGE BORE HESB = HANGER ENGINEERING SMALL BORE HSLB = HANGER SUPERINTENDENT LARGE BORE HSSB = HANGER SUPERINTENDENT SMALL BORE HYD = STARTUP HYDRO GROUP II = TUSI INSTRUMDITATION ENGINEERING

[*

IS = INSTRUMENTATION SUPERINTENDENT ME = TUSI MECHANICAL ENGINEERING MGR = TUSI PROJECT MANAGER MS = MILLWRIGHT SUPERINTENDENT MTG = MECHANICAL TEST GROUP NE = TUSI NUCLEAR ENGINEERING PMG = PROCUMRENT MANAGEMEhT GROUP PPV = P!.7MANENT PLANT VAULT

{

PS = PIPING SUPERINTENDENT QCA = QUALITY CONTROL ASME QCN = QUALITY CONTROL NON-ASME QCNM = QUALITY CONTROL NON-ASME MECHANICAL QCNS = QUALITY CONTROL NON-ASME STRUCTURAL r

QCNP = QUALITY CONTROL NON-ASME PAINT QCNH = QUALITY CONTROL NON-ASME HANGER.

QCNC = QUALITY CONTROL NON-ASME CIVIL 3

QCNE = QUALITY CONTROL NON-ASME ELECTRICAL QCS = QUALITY CONTROL COMPLETIONS STARTUP SSP = STARTUP SPECIAL PROJECTS STE = STARTUP TEST ENGINEER j

SUB = SUBCONTRACTS MANAGER t

l t

)

I I

i 1

f f

-)

..i MDB Guidelines Revision 1 Pege 7 of 7

)

TAP = THERMAL EIPANSION TEST GROUP TEM = TUCCO ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE TES = TUCCO ENGINEERING SUPERINTENDENT TFE = TASK PORCE ELECTRICAL TFK = STARTUP SUPPORT GROUP TTM = TASK TORCE MECHANICAL TIM = TUCCO INSTRUMENTATION MAINTENANCE TMM = TUGC0 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE TPM = TUCCO PLANT MANAGER WE = WELDING ENGINEERING WEST = WESTINGHOUSE SITE MANAGER EE-03 = SAFEGUARD BUILDING ENGINEERING GROUP CE-03 = SATEGUARD BUILDING ENGINEEE N GROUP EE-02 = CONTAINMENT BUILDING ENGIN1dl.'G GROUP CE-02 = CONTAINMENT BUILDING ENGIN):ET.'.iG GROUP l

EE-04*= ELECTRICAL-CONTROL BUILDIN' F.iGINEERING GROUP CE-04 = ELECTRICAL-CONTROL BUILDINW INGINEEP.ING GROUP EE-4A = AUIILIARY BUILDING ENGINEERihG GROUP l

CE-4A = AUIILIARY BUILDING ENGINEERING GROUP I

I PT/AT I

Preoperational/ Acceptance Test Procedure Number that cannot be started or completed until item is completed and closed out.

l CO:!PLETION DATE 1

Date item is closed.

l REdJLRKS Additional information needed to clarify problem or support status.

-i I

I t

i f

I t

I I

t

l PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTIUTIES GENERATING CO CPSES 1 f2 CP-Q P-17.0 4

APR 2 7 @

n s

PREPARED U

Menu CORRECTIVE ACTION

-' ~

QAW 1

APPROVED BY:

/

8#

I u

'DATE

1.0 REFERENCES

1-A CP-Q P-15.7,

" Tracking of Audi t Reports /Co ive Action g(hb -

fh I

2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure describes the methods utilized by TUGC0 QA in reviewing construction deficiencies and nonconfonnances for the purpose of providing corrective action to preclude repetition of. significant conditions adverse to quality.

The scope of this procedure encompasses safe ty-related construction activities at CPSES that are identified as deficient or nonconfonning and which nay require corrective action.

2.2 RESPONSIBILITY The Quality Assurance Supervisor and the Quality Engineering Supervisor are responsible for the evaluation of the need for corrective action in a systematic, timely and ef fective

manner, as described herein, within their area of responsibili ty 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 BASIC ACTIVITIES Quali ty Assu rance/Quali ty Engineering personnel a re routinely involved in the following basic activities:

TUGCO OA

% 5

$-7 ?? 1-E)#f

• l

j.

l I

~

+

PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.

CPSES CP-QP-17.0 4

APR 2 7 1984 2 of 2 a.

Review of nonconfomances and unsatisfactory conditions documented on Nonconformance

Reports, Inspection Reports, and QC Deficiency Reports.

b.

Frequent discussions with cognizant personnel.

c.

Monitoring / Surveillance of selected Construction Activities.

d.

Review of Field Design Changes / Deviations.

The results of these activities fom the basic background data for evaluating conditions which may TeqUTre corrective l

action.

Where feasible, the evaluation results are tracked using trend analysis techniques as an objective method of ascertaining the need for corrective action.

~

3.2 REPORTING 3.2.1 Quarterly Trend Analysis Reports Each calendar quarter a trend analysis report is prepared for the QE Supervi sor.

This trend analysis is ba sed on the review of deficiencies reported on Inspection Reports, Deficiency Reports, and Nonconfonnance Reports and certain field design changes and deviations.

The Site QA Manager will issue Corrective Action Requests per Paragraph 3.2.2 for trends identified as adverse to quality.

3.2.2 Corrective Action Request i

When conditions adverse to quality are identified through the activities in Paragraph 3.1

that, due to their significance and/or repe ti tive na tu re, require immediate attention the Site QA Manager shall issue a Corrective Action Request (CAR) in a fo nnal letter to appropriate management personnel.

The CAR shall specify a date by which written response is required from the addressee.

Implementation of stated corrective action shall be verified by Site QA, this verification will be doctanented and the responsible manager notified as to the acceptability of corrective action by memo from the Site QA Manager.

Tracking of open CAR's will be in accordance with Reference 1-A.

I 78 t#1t*A A A

.