ML20155E691: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:. . . - | ||
. - - - - - | |||
- . - . - . - ~ - .. - - - - - .. - - .- - .- . - .- . . | |||
.~ . | |||
. . - ~. . _ .. _ -. | |||
h | |||
dna4 | |||
* | |||
p | |||
9 | |||
UNITED STATES | |||
% | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
- | |||
REGION lli | |||
{ | |||
j | |||
801 WARRENvlLLE ROAD | |||
' | |||
* | |||
LISLE, ILLINOIS 60532-4351 | |||
\\***oj | |||
\\ | |||
October 30, 1998 | |||
. | |||
1 | |||
Mr. W. G. MacFarland IV | |||
' | |||
* | |||
Senior Vice President | |||
Clinton Power Station | |||
lilinois Power Company | |||
Mail Code V-275 | |||
, | |||
Post Office Box 678 | |||
Clinton, IL 61727 | |||
SUBJECT: | |||
CLINTON INSPECTION REPORT 50-461/98017(DRP) AND | |||
i | |||
NOTICE OF VIOLATION | |||
, | |||
Dear Mr. MacFarland: | |||
On October 1,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at the Clinton Power Station. .Tne | |||
) | |||
. | |||
enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. During the period covered by this | |||
inspection, the conduct of activities at the Clinton facility was generally characterized by | |||
continued deficiencies involving Technical Specification implementation and ineffective | |||
corrective actions for conditions adverse to quality. | |||
Two examples of a failure to take adequate corrective actions for conditions adverse to quality | |||
were identified. In the first example, you identified that corrective actions taken from | |||
September 1990 to April 1998, to improve the timely performance of safety screenings or. | |||
evaluations for disabled or out-of-service annunciators were not fully effective. In | |||
September 1998, NRC inspectors identified that corrective actions had yet to be developed and | |||
; | |||
impicmented for this issue. As a result, multiple disabicd or out-of-service annunciators had not | |||
/g | |||
j- | |||
been evaluated to ensure that the degraded conditions did not constitute defacto changes to | |||
the facility as described in the Updated Safety Analysis Report. In the second example, NRC | |||
- | |||
inspectors identified that you closed four out of ten engineering department condition reports | |||
' | |||
without either determining the apparent cause for the issue or the extent of the condition or | |||
developing corrective actions to address the apparent cause. Improvements in the corrective | |||
i | |||
action program will continue to be monitored as part of the NRC's Manual Chapter 0350, Case | |||
Specific Checklist item 111.1, " Establish and Implement Actions to Achieve and Sustain | |||
improvement in the Corrective Action Program." | |||
j | |||
= We are concerned about one violation of NRC requirements that was identified during the | |||
inspection regarding the failure of technicians to announce area radiation monitor annunciators | |||
1 | |||
' to the control room supervisor. This violation is of concern becaut,e important information | |||
; ' | |||
regarding the status of safety-related components and systems was not being communicated to | |||
the control room staff and this was apparently a routine practice for certain annunciators rather | |||
than a one-time' occurrence. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation, and the | |||
j | |||
circumstances surrounding the violation are described in detail in toe enclosed report. The | |||
, | |||
NRC has concluded that information regarding the reasons for the violation, the corrective | |||
actions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence, and the date | |||
when full compliance will be achieved, is already adequately addressed in the enclosed report. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
4 | |||
9811050153 981030 | |||
E | |||
PDR- ADOCK 05000461 | |||
0 | |||
0 | |||
PDR | |||
$ | |||
- | |||
-- | |||
. | |||
- - . | |||
. | |||
. | |||
- .- | |||
. | |||
-- | |||
-. . | |||
. . . | |||
. | |||
. - . - | |||
- | |||
-- | |||
- | |||
-- | |||
- | |||
._ | |||
- | |||
- | |||
-- | |||
, | |||
. | |||
W. MacFarland | |||
-2- | |||
Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not | |||
accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position in that case, or if you ch1ose to | |||
provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed | |||
Notice, | |||
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the | |||
enclosures, and your response to this letter, if you should choose to respond, will be placed in | |||
the NRC Public Document Room. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Director | |||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
Docket No.: 50-461 | |||
< | |||
License No.: NPF-62 | |||
Enclosures: | |||
1. | |||
Notice of Violation | |||
i | |||
2. | |||
Inspection Report 50-461/98017(DRP) | |||
cc w/encis: | |||
G. Hunger, Station Manager | |||
R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety | |||
and Performance Improvement | |||
J. Sipek, Director - Licensing | |||
Nathan Schloss, Economist | |||
Office of the Attorney General | |||
G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing | |||
Services Project Ma,1ager | |||
General Electric Company | |||
Chairman, DeWitt County Board | |||
State Liaison Officer | |||
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission | |||
S_EE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE | |||
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CLIN \\CLl98107.DRP | |||
To receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enet "E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy | |||
] | |||
OFF!CE | |||
Rlli | |||
Rill | |||
MDapas Mh | |||
NAME | |||
TKozak:ml | |||
DATE | |||
10/ /98 | |||
10d98 | |||
l | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
.=. | |||
- | |||
- | |||
. - . . | |||
. . . . . | |||
.-- | |||
. - - | |||
_- | |||
-. | |||
.. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
W. MacFarland | |||
-2- | |||
Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not | |||
accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to | |||
provide additional iriformation, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed | |||
Notice. | |||
j | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2790 of the NRC's '' Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the | |||
enclosures, and your response to this letter, if you should choose to respond, will be placed in | |||
the NRC Public Document Room. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
1 | |||
Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Director | |||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
Docket No.: 50-461 | |||
License No.: NPF-62 | |||
Enclosures: | |||
1. | |||
Notice of Violation | |||
2. | |||
Inspection Report 50-461/98017(DRP) | |||
cc w/ enc!s: | |||
G. Hunger, Station Manager | |||
R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety | |||
and Performance Improvement | |||
J. Sipek, Director - Licensing | |||
Nathan Schloss, Economist | |||
Office of the Attorney General | |||
G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing | |||
Services Project Manager | |||
: | |||
General Electric Company | |||
Chairman, DeWitt County Board | |||
State Liaison Officer | |||
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission | |||
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CLIN \\CLl98107.DRP | |||
To receive a coprof this document. 6ndicate m the box "c" = copy without attach /enci"E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy | |||
h | |||
OFFICE | |||
Rlli | |||
Rlli | |||
NAME | |||
TKozak:mlM/ | |||
MDapas | |||
DATE | |||
10/p/98 | |||
10/ /98 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
. | |||
.--9 | |||
- | |||
1 | |||
- c~ | |||
4 | |||
W. MacFarland - | |||
-3- | |||
. | |||
Distribution: | |||
RPC (E-Mail) | |||
Project Mgr., NRR w/encls | |||
J Caldwell, Rlli w/encls | |||
, | |||
C. Pederson, Rlil wiencls | |||
B. Clayton, Rlli w/encls | |||
SRI Clinton w/encls | |||
DRP w/encls : | |||
TSS w/encls | |||
DRS (2) w/ enc!s | |||
Rlli PRR w/encls | |||
PUBLIC IE-01 w/encls | |||
Docket File w/encls - | |||
GREENS | |||
LEO (E-Mail) | |||
DOCDESK (E-Mail) | |||
, | |||
i | |||
, | |||
h | |||
a | |||
. | |||
- | |||
I | |||
d0 | |||
, | |||
: | |||
- - | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:38, 10 December 2024
| ML20155E691 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1998 |
| From: | Dapas M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Walter MacFarland ILLINOIS POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155E696 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461-98-17, NUDOCS 9811050153 | |
| Download: ML20155E691 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000461/1998017
Text
. . . -
. - - - - -
- . - . - . - ~ - .. - - - - - .. - - .- - .- . - .- . .
.~ .
. . - ~. . _ .. _ -.
h
dna4
p
9
UNITED STATES
%
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
REGION lli
{
j
801 WARRENvlLLE ROAD
'
LISLE, ILLINOIS 60532-4351
\\***oj
\\
October 30, 1998
.
1
Mr. W. G. MacFarland IV
'
Senior Vice President
Clinton Power Station
lilinois Power Company
Mail Code V-275
,
Post Office Box 678
Clinton, IL 61727
SUBJECT:
CLINTON INSPECTION REPORT 50-461/98017(DRP) AND
i
,
Dear Mr. MacFarland:
On October 1,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at the Clinton Power Station. .Tne
)
.
enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. During the period covered by this
inspection, the conduct of activities at the Clinton facility was generally characterized by
continued deficiencies involving Technical Specification implementation and ineffective
corrective actions for conditions adverse to quality.
Two examples of a failure to take adequate corrective actions for conditions adverse to quality
were identified. In the first example, you identified that corrective actions taken from
September 1990 to April 1998, to improve the timely performance of safety screenings or.
evaluations for disabled or out-of-service annunciators were not fully effective. In
September 1998, NRC inspectors identified that corrective actions had yet to be developed and
impicmented for this issue. As a result, multiple disabicd or out-of-service annunciators had not
/g
j-
been evaluated to ensure that the degraded conditions did not constitute defacto changes to
the facility as described in the Updated Safety Analysis Report. In the second example, NRC
-
inspectors identified that you closed four out of ten engineering department condition reports
'
without either determining the apparent cause for the issue or the extent of the condition or
developing corrective actions to address the apparent cause. Improvements in the corrective
i
action program will continue to be monitored as part of the NRC's Manual Chapter 0350, Case
Specific Checklist item 111.1, " Establish and Implement Actions to Achieve and Sustain
improvement in the Corrective Action Program."
j
= We are concerned about one violation of NRC requirements that was identified during the
inspection regarding the failure of technicians to announce area radiation monitor annunciators
1
' to the control room supervisor. This violation is of concern becaut,e important information
- '
regarding the status of safety-related components and systems was not being communicated to
the control room staff and this was apparently a routine practice for certain annunciators rather
than a one-time' occurrence. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation, and the
j
circumstances surrounding the violation are described in detail in toe enclosed report. The
,
NRC has concluded that information regarding the reasons for the violation, the corrective
actions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence, and the date
when full compliance will be achieved, is already adequately addressed in the enclosed report.
.
.
4
9811050153 981030
E
PDR- ADOCK 05000461
0
0
$
-
--
.
- - .
.
.
- .-
.
--
-. .
. . .
.
. - . -
-
--
-
--
-
._
-
-
--
,
.
W. MacFarland
-2-
Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not
accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position in that case, or if you ch1ose to
provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed
Notice,
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
enclosures, and your response to this letter, if you should choose to respond, will be placed in
the NRC Public Document Room.
Sincerely,
Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No.: 50-461
<
License No.: NPF-62
Enclosures:
1.
i
2.
Inspection Report 50-461/98017(DRP)
cc w/encis:
G. Hunger, Station Manager
R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety
and Performance Improvement
J. Sipek, Director - Licensing
Nathan Schloss, Economist
Office of the Attorney General
G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing
Services Project Ma,1ager
General Electric Company
Chairman, DeWitt County Board
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
S_EE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CLIN \\CLl98107.DRP
To receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enet "E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy
]
OFF!CE
Rlli
Rill
MDapas Mh
NAME
TKozak:ml
DATE
10/ /98
10d98
l
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
.=.
-
-
. - . .
. . . . .
.--
. - -
_-
-.
..
.
.
.
W. MacFarland
-2-
Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not
accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to
provide additional iriformation, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed
Notice.
j
In accordance with 10 CFR 2790 of the NRC's Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
enclosures, and your response to this letter, if you should choose to respond, will be placed in
the NRC Public Document Room.
Sincerely,
1
Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No.: 50-461
License No.: NPF-62
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report 50-461/98017(DRP)
cc w/ enc!s:
G. Hunger, Station Manager
R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety
and Performance Improvement
J. Sipek, Director - Licensing
Nathan Schloss, Economist
Office of the Attorney General
G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing
Services Project Manager
General Electric Company
Chairman, DeWitt County Board
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CLIN \\CLl98107.DRP
To receive a coprof this document. 6ndicate m the box "c" = copy without attach /enci"E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy
h
OFFICE
Rlli
Rlli
NAME
TKozak:mlM/
MDapas
DATE
10/p/98
10/ /98
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
.
.--9
-
1
- c~
4
W. MacFarland -
-3-
.
Distribution:
RPC (E-Mail)
Project Mgr., NRR w/encls
J Caldwell, Rlli w/encls
,
C. Pederson, Rlil wiencls
B. Clayton, Rlli w/encls
SRI Clinton w/encls
DRP w/encls :
TSS w/encls
DRS (2) w/ enc!s
Rlli PRR w/encls
PUBLIC IE-01 w/encls
Docket File w/encls -
GREENS
LEO (E-Mail)
DOCDESK (E-Mail)
,
i
,
h
a
.
-
I
d0
,
- -