ML20155E691: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:. . . -
. - - - - -
- . - . - . - ~ - .. - - - - - .. - - .- - .- . - .- . .
.~ .
. . - ~. . _ .. _ -.
h
dna4
*
p
9
UNITED STATES
%
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
REGION lli
{
j
801 WARRENvlLLE ROAD
'
*
LISLE, ILLINOIS 60532-4351
\\***oj
\\
October 30, 1998
.
1
Mr. W. G. MacFarland IV
'
*
Senior Vice President
Clinton Power Station
lilinois Power Company
Mail Code V-275
,
Post Office Box 678
Clinton, IL 61727
SUBJECT:
CLINTON INSPECTION REPORT 50-461/98017(DRP) AND
i
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
,
Dear Mr. MacFarland:
On October 1,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at the Clinton Power Station. .Tne
)
.
enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. During the period covered by this
inspection, the conduct of activities at the Clinton facility was generally characterized by
continued deficiencies involving Technical Specification implementation and ineffective
corrective actions for conditions adverse to quality.
Two examples of a failure to take adequate corrective actions for conditions adverse to quality
were identified. In the first example, you identified that corrective actions taken from
September 1990 to April 1998, to improve the timely performance of safety screenings or.
evaluations for disabled or out-of-service annunciators were not fully effective. In
September 1998, NRC inspectors identified that corrective actions had yet to be developed and
;
impicmented for this issue. As a result, multiple disabicd or out-of-service annunciators had not
/g
j-
been evaluated to ensure that the degraded conditions did not constitute defacto changes to
the facility as described in the Updated Safety Analysis Report. In the second example, NRC
-
inspectors identified that you closed four out of ten engineering department condition reports
'
without either determining the apparent cause for the issue or the extent of the condition or
developing corrective actions to address the apparent cause. Improvements in the corrective
i
action program will continue to be monitored as part of the NRC's Manual Chapter 0350, Case
Specific Checklist item 111.1, " Establish and Implement Actions to Achieve and Sustain
improvement in the Corrective Action Program."
j
= We are concerned about one violation of NRC requirements that was identified during the
inspection regarding the failure of technicians to announce area radiation monitor annunciators
1
' to the control room supervisor. This violation is of concern becaut,e important information
; '
regarding the status of safety-related components and systems was not being communicated to
the control room staff and this was apparently a routine practice for certain annunciators rather
than a one-time' occurrence. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation, and the
j
circumstances surrounding the violation are described in detail in toe enclosed report. The
,
NRC has concluded that information regarding the reasons for the violation, the corrective
actions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence, and the date
when full compliance will be achieved, is already adequately addressed in the enclosed report.
.
.
4
9811050153 981030
E
PDR- ADOCK 05000461
0
0
PDR
$
-
--
.
- - .
.
.
- .-
.
--
 
-. .
. . .
.
. - . -
-
--
-
--
-
._
-
-
--
,
.
W. MacFarland
-2-
Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not
accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position in that case, or if you ch1ose to
provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed
Notice,
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
enclosures, and your response to this letter, if you should choose to respond, will be placed in
the NRC Public Document Room.
Sincerely,
Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No.: 50-461
<
License No.: NPF-62
Enclosures:
1.
Notice of Violation
i
2.
Inspection Report 50-461/98017(DRP)
cc w/encis:
G. Hunger, Station Manager
R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety
and Performance Improvement
J. Sipek, Director - Licensing
Nathan Schloss, Economist
Office of the Attorney General
G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing
Services Project Ma,1ager
General Electric Company
Chairman, DeWitt County Board
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
S_EE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CLIN \\CLl98107.DRP
To receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enet "E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy
]
OFF!CE
Rlli
Rill
MDapas Mh
NAME
TKozak:ml
DATE
10/ /98
10d98
l
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
.=.
-
-
. - . .
. . . . .
.--
. - -
_-
-.
..
.
.
.
W. MacFarland
-2-
Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not
accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to
provide additional iriformation, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed
Notice.
j
In accordance with 10 CFR 2790 of the NRC's '' Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
enclosures, and your response to this letter, if you should choose to respond, will be placed in
the NRC Public Document Room.
Sincerely,
1
Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No.: 50-461
License No.: NPF-62
Enclosures:
1.
Notice of Violation
2.
Inspection Report 50-461/98017(DRP)
cc w/ enc!s:
G. Hunger, Station Manager
R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety
and Performance Improvement
J. Sipek, Director - Licensing
Nathan Schloss, Economist
Office of the Attorney General
G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing
Services Project Manager
:
General Electric Company
Chairman, DeWitt County Board
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CLIN \\CLl98107.DRP
To receive a coprof this document. 6ndicate m the box "c" = copy without attach /enci"E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy
h
OFFICE
Rlli
Rlli
NAME
TKozak:mlM/
MDapas
DATE
10/p/98
10/ /98
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
.
.--9
-
 
1
- c~
4
W. MacFarland -
-3-
.
Distribution:
RPC (E-Mail)
Project Mgr., NRR w/encls
J Caldwell, Rlli w/encls
,
C. Pederson, Rlil wiencls
B. Clayton, Rlli w/encls
SRI Clinton w/encls
DRP w/encls :
TSS w/encls
DRS (2) w/ enc!s
Rlli PRR w/encls
PUBLIC IE-01 w/encls
Docket File w/encls -
GREENS
LEO (E-Mail)
DOCDESK (E-Mail)
,
i
,
h
a
.
-
I
d0
,
:
- -
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 21:38, 10 December 2024

Forwards Insp Rept 50-461/98-17 on 980819-1001 & Notice of Violation Re Failure to Take Adequate Corrective Actions for Conditions Adverse to Quality Were Identified
ML20155E691
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/30/1998
From: Dapas M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Walter MacFarland
ILLINOIS POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20155E696 List:
References
50-461-98-17, NUDOCS 9811050153
Download: ML20155E691 (4)


See also: IR 05000461/1998017

Text

. . . -

. - - - - -

- . - . - . - ~ - .. - - - - - .. - - .- - .- . - .- . .

.~ .

. . - ~. . _ .. _ -.

h

dna4

p

9

UNITED STATES

%

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

-

REGION lli

{

j

801 WARRENvlLLE ROAD

'

LISLE, ILLINOIS 60532-4351

\\***oj

\\

October 30, 1998

.

1

Mr. W. G. MacFarland IV

'

Senior Vice President

Clinton Power Station

lilinois Power Company

Mail Code V-275

,

Post Office Box 678

Clinton, IL 61727

SUBJECT:

CLINTON INSPECTION REPORT 50-461/98017(DRP) AND

i

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

,

Dear Mr. MacFarland:

On October 1,1998, the NRC completed an inspection at the Clinton Power Station. .Tne

)

.

enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. During the period covered by this

inspection, the conduct of activities at the Clinton facility was generally characterized by

continued deficiencies involving Technical Specification implementation and ineffective

corrective actions for conditions adverse to quality.

Two examples of a failure to take adequate corrective actions for conditions adverse to quality

were identified. In the first example, you identified that corrective actions taken from

September 1990 to April 1998, to improve the timely performance of safety screenings or.

evaluations for disabled or out-of-service annunciators were not fully effective. In

September 1998, NRC inspectors identified that corrective actions had yet to be developed and

impicmented for this issue. As a result, multiple disabicd or out-of-service annunciators had not

/g

j-

been evaluated to ensure that the degraded conditions did not constitute defacto changes to

the facility as described in the Updated Safety Analysis Report. In the second example, NRC

-

inspectors identified that you closed four out of ten engineering department condition reports

'

without either determining the apparent cause for the issue or the extent of the condition or

developing corrective actions to address the apparent cause. Improvements in the corrective

i

action program will continue to be monitored as part of the NRC's Manual Chapter 0350, Case

Specific Checklist item 111.1, " Establish and Implement Actions to Achieve and Sustain

improvement in the Corrective Action Program."

j

= We are concerned about one violation of NRC requirements that was identified during the

inspection regarding the failure of technicians to announce area radiation monitor annunciators

1

' to the control room supervisor. This violation is of concern becaut,e important information

'

regarding the status of safety-related components and systems was not being communicated to

the control room staff and this was apparently a routine practice for certain annunciators rather

than a one-time' occurrence. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation, and the

j

circumstances surrounding the violation are described in detail in toe enclosed report. The

,

NRC has concluded that information regarding the reasons for the violation, the corrective

actions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence, and the date

when full compliance will be achieved, is already adequately addressed in the enclosed report.

.

.

4

9811050153 981030

E

PDR- ADOCK 05000461

0

0

PDR

$

-

--

.

- - .

.

.

- .-

.

--

-. .

. . .

.

. - . -

-

--

-

--

-

._

-

-

--

,

.

W. MacFarland

-2-

Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not

accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position in that case, or if you ch1ose to

provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed

Notice,

in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the

enclosures, and your response to this letter, if you should choose to respond, will be placed in

the NRC Public Document Room.

Sincerely,

Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No.: 50-461

<

License No.: NPF-62

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

i

2.

Inspection Report 50-461/98017(DRP)

cc w/encis:

G. Hunger, Station Manager

R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety

and Performance Improvement

J. Sipek, Director - Licensing

Nathan Schloss, Economist

Office of the Attorney General

G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing

Services Project Ma,1ager

General Electric Company

Chairman, DeWitt County Board

State Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission

S_EE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CLIN \\CLl98107.DRP

To receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enet "E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy

]

OFF!CE

Rlli

Rill

MDapas Mh

NAME

TKozak:ml

DATE

10/ /98

10d98

l

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

.=.

-

-

. - . .

. . . . .

.--

. - -

_-

-.

..

.

.

.

W. MacFarland

-2-

Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not

accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to

provide additional iriformation, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed

Notice.

j

In accordance with 10 CFR 2790 of the NRC's Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the

enclosures, and your response to this letter, if you should choose to respond, will be placed in

the NRC Public Document Room.

Sincerely,

1

Marc L. Dapas, Deputy Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No.: 50-461

License No.: NPF-62

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Report 50-461/98017(DRP)

cc w/ enc!s:

G. Hunger, Station Manager

R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety

and Performance Improvement

J. Sipek, Director - Licensing

Nathan Schloss, Economist

Office of the Attorney General

G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing

Services Project Manager

General Electric Company

Chairman, DeWitt County Board

State Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CLIN \\CLl98107.DRP

To receive a coprof this document. 6ndicate m the box "c" = copy without attach /enci"E" = Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy

h

OFFICE

Rlli

Rlli

NAME

TKozak:mlM/

MDapas

DATE

10/p/98

10/ /98

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

.

.--9

-

1

- c~

4

W. MacFarland -

-3-

.

Distribution:

RPC (E-Mail)

Project Mgr., NRR w/encls

J Caldwell, Rlli w/encls

,

C. Pederson, Rlil wiencls

B. Clayton, Rlli w/encls

SRI Clinton w/encls

DRP w/encls :

TSS w/encls

DRS (2) w/ enc!s

Rlli PRR w/encls

PUBLIC IE-01 w/encls

Docket File w/encls -

GREENS

LEO (E-Mail)

DOCDESK (E-Mail)

,

i

,

h

a

.

-

I

d0

,

- -