ML20155K549: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:1 l | ||
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION GPU Nuclear Corporation Docket No. | |||
50-320 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 License No. DPR-73 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 2-6, 1988 and in accordance with the the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register on September 28, 1987 (52FR36215), the following violations were identified: | |||
A. | |||
10 CFR 20,311(b) requires, in part, that the manifest accompanying radio-active waste shipments indicate as completely as practicable the radio-nuclide identity and quantity and the total radioactivity in the shipment. | |||
10 CFR 20.311(c) requires, in part, the manifest must include a certifi-cation by the waste generator that the transported materials are properly described. | |||
Contrary to the above, on February 19, 1988, your Shipment Number 88-025-II of radioactive waste was sent to a burial site and was accompanied by a manife;t which reported a different package than the one which was shipped. | |||
As a result, the total radioactivity stated on the manifest was in error. | |||
Further, the certification which accompanied the manifest was also in error. | |||
B. | |||
10 CFR 71.5(a)(1)(vi) requires that shipping papers be prepared in accord-ance with 49 CFR 172, Subpart C. | |||
49 CFR 172.203(d)(iii) requires the activity of each package in the shipment be included in the shipping papers. | |||
Contrary to the above, on February 19, 1988, your Shipment Number 88-025-II of radioactive waste was sent to a burial site and the shipping papers did not include the activities of the radionuclides contained in one package in the shipment. | |||
Violations A and R have been categorized in the aggregate as a Severity Level IV problem. | |||
(S wt V) | |||
[BP EE E$$s GEE ilF. CORD CS?l" | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:48, 10 December 2024
| ML20155K549 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 06/14/1988 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155K542 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-320-88-07, 50-320-88-7, NUDOCS 8806210275 | |
| Download: ML20155K549 (1) | |
Text
1 l
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION GPU Nuclear Corporation Docket No.
50-320 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 License No. DPR-73 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 2-6, 1988 and in accordance with the the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register on September 28, 1987 (52FR36215), the following violations were identified:
A.
10 CFR 20,311(b) requires, in part, that the manifest accompanying radio-active waste shipments indicate as completely as practicable the radio-nuclide identity and quantity and the total radioactivity in the shipment.
10 CFR 20.311(c) requires, in part, the manifest must include a certifi-cation by the waste generator that the transported materials are properly described.
Contrary to the above, on February 19, 1988, your Shipment Number 88-025-II of radioactive waste was sent to a burial site and was accompanied by a manife;t which reported a different package than the one which was shipped.
As a result, the total radioactivity stated on the manifest was in error.
Further, the certification which accompanied the manifest was also in error.
B.
10 CFR 71.5(a)(1)(vi) requires that shipping papers be prepared in accord-ance with 49 CFR 172, Subpart C.
49 CFR 172.203(d)(iii) requires the activity of each package in the shipment be included in the shipping papers.
Contrary to the above, on February 19, 1988, your Shipment Number 88-025-II of radioactive waste was sent to a burial site and the shipping papers did not include the activities of the radionuclides contained in one package in the shipment.
Violations A and R have been categorized in the aggregate as a Severity Level IV problem.
(S wt V)
[BP EE E$$s GEE ilF. CORD CS?l"
-