ML20141A145: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 402/536 4000 March 27, 1986 LIC-86-128 Mr. Brian Grimes | Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 402/536 4000 March 27, 1986 LIC-86-128 Mr. Brian Grimes Director, Division of QA Vendor | ||
Director, Division of QA Vendor | & Tech. Training U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 e | ||
Re ferences: | |||
Re ferences: | Docket No. 50-285 Letter to B.W. Reznicek from J. Taylor, dated January 21, 1986. | ||
==Dear Mr. Grimes:== | ==Dear Mr. Grimes:== | ||
Safety System Outage Modification Inspection (Design) 50-286/85-22 The purpose of this letter is to document the conversations between Ralph Archizel of your staff and James Fisicaro of my staff, concerning OPPD's response to the subject Inspection Report. Mr. Fisicaro stated that OPPD was in the final stages of preparing our response and planned on submitting the response on March 28, 1986. On March 21, 1986, OPPD received the second report relating to the installation and testing phase of the inspec-tion, and we believe that additional time is necessary in order to review and evaluate the second report. With this additional time OPPD will ensure that the details in the second report do not have an adverse affect on OPPD's planned corrective action for the first report. Mr. Fisicaro also l | |||
Safety System Outage Modification Inspection (Design) 50-286/85-22 The purpose of this letter is to document the conversations between Ralph Archizel of your staff and James Fisicaro of my staff, concerning OPPD's response to the subject Inspection Report. Mr. Fisicaro stated that OPPD was in the final stages of preparing our response and planned on submitting the response on March 28, 1986. On March 21, 1986, OPPD received the second report relating to the installation and testing phase of the inspec-tion, and we believe that additional time is necessary in order to review and evaluate the second report. With this additional time OPPD will ensure that the details in the second report do not have an adverse affect on OPPD's planned corrective action for the first report. Mr. Fisicaro also l | stated that OPPD was responding to only the first report and would be dis-l cussing the second report with Region IV. OPPD's new submittal date for I | ||
Aq 8604040400 860327 PDR | the response to the first report is April 15, 1986. | ||
Nuclear Production RLA/JJF/me l | Aq 8604040400 860327 PDR ADOCK 05000205 R. L. Andrews o | ||
l | PDR Division Manager l | ||
E. G. Tourigny, NRC Project Manager | Nuclear Production RLA/JJF/me l | ||
cc: LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W. | |||
l Washington, DC 20036 R. D. Martin, NRC Regional Administrator E. G. Tourigny, NRC Project Manager L | |||
P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector j6 r muoumengn,gopponunau esm | |||
_ _ - -. _.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:06, 11 December 2024
| ML20141A145 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 03/27/1986 |
| From: | Andrews R OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| References | |
| LIC-86-128, NUDOCS 8604040400 | |
| Download: ML20141A145 (1) | |
Text
.
Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 402/536 4000 March 27, 1986 LIC-86-128 Mr. Brian Grimes Director, Division of QA Vendor
& Tech. Training U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 e
Re ferences:
Docket No. 50-285 Letter to B.W. Reznicek from J. Taylor, dated January 21, 1986.
Dear Mr. Grimes:
Safety System Outage Modification Inspection (Design) 50-286/85-22 The purpose of this letter is to document the conversations between Ralph Archizel of your staff and James Fisicaro of my staff, concerning OPPD's response to the subject Inspection Report. Mr. Fisicaro stated that OPPD was in the final stages of preparing our response and planned on submitting the response on March 28, 1986. On March 21, 1986, OPPD received the second report relating to the installation and testing phase of the inspec-tion, and we believe that additional time is necessary in order to review and evaluate the second report. With this additional time OPPD will ensure that the details in the second report do not have an adverse affect on OPPD's planned corrective action for the first report. Mr. Fisicaro also l
stated that OPPD was responding to only the first report and would be dis-l cussing the second report with Region IV. OPPD's new submittal date for I
the response to the first report is April 15, 1986.
Aq 8604040400 860327 PDR ADOCK 05000205 R. L. Andrews o
PDR Division Manager l
Nuclear Production RLA/JJF/me l
cc: LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.
l Washington, DC 20036 R. D. Martin, NRC Regional Administrator E. G. Tourigny, NRC Project Manager L
P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector j6 r muoumengn,gopponunau esm
_ _ - -. _.