ML20125C342: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'
{{#Wiki_filter:.'
              .' '
'
                    -
'
                  y[f uc,g      h
-
                      * , # ,g ;n                             UNITED STATES
y[f uc,gh
              *
, # ,g ;n
                  s,
UNITED STATES
                  #
*
                          +'y     i           NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
s,
                    o h QQf!
+'y
                        '%;
i
                                                            WASHINGTON, D C. 20565
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                        *****                                 December 8, 1992
*
                      Docket No. 50-331
o h QQ !
                          lowa Electric Light
#
                            and Power Company
WASHINGTON, D C. 20565
f
'%;
*****
December 8, 1992
Docket No. 50-331
lowa Electric Light
and Power Company
byd"Q
byd"Q
E                         ATTN:   Mr. Lee Liu
E
    ..
ATTN:
        V'                       Chairman of the Board
Mr. Lee Liu
  ,      :yd                         and Chief Executive Officer
..
      -.e               IE Towers
V'
.. , , i                 P.O. Box 35)
Chairman of the Board
i $$                     Cedar Rapids, IA 52406
:yd
lL f
and Chief Executive Officer
'D *f$ '                  Dear Mr. Liu:
,
                          SUBJECT:     INSPECTION OF THE PROCUREMENT AND COMMERCIAL GRADE DEDICATION
IE Towers
                                      PROGRAMS AT THE DUANE ARN0LD ENERGY CENTER (REPORT NO.
-.e
                                      50-331/92-201)
.. , , i
                          This letter transmits the report of the inspection conducted May 11
P.O. Box 35)
                          through 15, 1992, at Iowa Electric Light and Power (IELP) Company's Duane
i $$
                          Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) by R. Pettis, S. Alexander, L. Camobell, and
Cedar Rapids, IA 52406
                          S. Magruder of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Vendor Inspection
lL *f$ '
                          Branch (VIB) and R. Langstaff of NRC Region III. The inspection was related
f
                          to activities at the plant site authorized by NRC license DPR-49. At the
'D
                          conclusion of the inspection, we discussed our findings with Mr. J. Franz,
Dear Mr. Liu:
                          Vice President, and the other members of your staff identified in Section 5     i
SUBJECT:
                          of the enclosed inspection report.
INSPECTION OF THE PROCUREMENT AND COMMERCIAL GRADE DEDICATION
                                                                                                          ~
PROGRAMS AT THE DUANE ARN0LD ENERGY CENTER (REPORT NO.
                          The inspection was conducted to review the implementation of IELP's program -
50-331/92-201)
                          for the procure,ent and dedication o.f commercial grade items (CGIs) used in
This letter transmits the report of the inspection conducted May 11
                          safety-related     alications at DAEC. The inspection team identified a major
through 15, 1992, at Iowa Electric Light and Power (IELP) Company's Duane
                          program strer,     in that IELP's policy was to purchase safety-related spare
Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) by R. Pettis, S. Alexander, L. Camobell, and
                          and replacement items from original equipment manufacturers with approved
S. Magruder of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Vendor Inspection
                            10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, quality assurance programs when available, thus
Branch (VIB) and R. Langstaff of NRC Region III.
                          reducing the number of items that need to be purchased commercial grade and
The inspection was related
                          detlicated fcr use in safety-related applications. Another strength identified
to activities at the plant site authorized by NRC license DPR-49. At the
                          was IELP's receipt inspection and testing capabilities for performing material
conclusion of the inspection, we discussed our findings with Mr. J. Franz,
                          verification which are perform (d by independent quality control inspectors
Vice President, and the other members of your staff identified in Section 5
                          qualified to ANS! N45.2.6.
i
                          The results of the inspection also indicate that some weaknesses existed
of the enclosed inspection report.
                            within IELP's program for the dedication of CGIs procured for use in safety-
~
                            related applications. These weaknesses contributed to the specific findings
The inspection was conducted to review the implementation of IELP's program -
                            that were identified during the review of dedication files for CGIs installed
for the procure,ent and dedication o.f commercial grade items (CGIs) used in
                            or available for installation in safety-related plant systems. Examples of
safety-related
                            these findings are that IELP did not fully verify the material of certain
alications at DAEC. The inspection team identified a major
                            CGIs, did not have provisions to fully assure material traceability and lot
program strer,
                            homogeneity when using statistical sampling plans, did not properly classify
in that IELP's policy was to purchase safety-related spare
                                  9212110153 921208
and replacement items from original equipment manufacturers with approved
                                  PDR   ADOCK 0S00       1                                           A
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, quality assurance programs when available, thus
reducing the number of items that need to be purchased commercial grade and
detlicated fcr use in safety-related applications. Another strength identified
was IELP's receipt inspection and testing capabilities for performing material
verification which are perform (d by independent quality control inspectors
qualified to ANS! N45.2.6.
The results of the inspection also indicate that some weaknesses existed
within IELP's program for the dedication of CGIs procured for use in safety-
related applications.
These weaknesses contributed to the specific findings
that were identified during the review of dedication files for CGIs installed
or available for installation in safety-related plant systems.
Examples of
these findings are that IELP did not fully verify the material of certain
CGIs, did not have provisions to fully assure material traceability and lot
homogeneity when using statistical sampling plans, did not properly classify
9212110153 921208
A
PDR
ADOCK 0S00
1


                                                                                        . . -.
. .
-s ,
-.
*   .
-s
,
*
.
.
Mr. Lee Liu
-2-
certain valve and pump parts when using a generic classification approach, and
did not assure the calibration and control-of certain test equipment used in
the dedication process.
It should be noted that the inspection team selected
for review equipment from DAEC's safety-related component list and made no
further attempts to assess individual component contribution to the system's
safety-related function,
lhis was the fourth of a series of five pilot inspections being ccoducted to
evaluate the implementation of licensee- CGI procurement and dedication
programs and to finalize an inspection procedure for future inspections of
this type.
The other four inspections also identified certain weaknesses in
licensee CGI deaication programs and their implementation.
The first three
inspections classified these weaknesses as deficiencies with the potential for
subsequent enforcement actions by the appropriate NRC regional of fice. - During
this period, the NRC also received significant feedback from several utilities
and from the Nuclear Management and Resources Council questioning the
regulatory basis for the CGI dedication guidance contained in NRC Generic
Letter 91-05 as well as specific interpretations of that guidance by the NRC
inspection teams.
In order for the NRC to properly respond to these concerns and to resolve
major points of contention cencerning the CGI dedication process we will be
holding public meetings with individual utilities and conducting a public
workshop which will address issues concerning-the existing dedication guidance
and specific interpretations of that guidance.
Prior to the public workshop,
the proposed ir.spection procedure for future inspections will be issued for
public comment and discussion at the workshop.
In view of these pending actions, the specific observations concerning your
CGI dedication programs and implementation are classified as " findings."
Because of the need for additional discussion of the appropriate guidance for
dedication of CGis, no enforcement action will be taken based on any of the
five pilot inspections.
It should be recognized, however, that some of these
findings may require corrective action-based on: (1) their potential impact on
the performance of specific equipment. -or (2) because of noncompliance with
your commitments to specific industry standards or regulatory guides endorsing
such standards.
We expect that-you will evaluate the inspection findings in
view of these considerations and take appropriate corrective action as
necessary.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of
this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the NRC's Public Document
Room.
-.
_
,
.-
-
-
-
.
.
      Mr. Lee Liu                              -2-
      certain valve and pump parts when using a generic classification approach, and
      did not assure the calibration and control-of certain test equipment used in
        the dedication process. It should be noted that the inspection team selected
        for review equipment from DAEC's safety-related component list and made no
        further attempts to assess individual component contribution to the system's
        safety-related function,
      lhis was the fourth of a series of five pilot inspections being ccoducted to
      evaluate the implementation of licensee- CGI procurement and dedication
      programs and to finalize an inspection procedure for future inspections of
      this type.    The other four inspections also identified certain weaknesses in
        licensee CGI deaication programs and their implementation.      The first three
        inspections classified these weaknesses as deficiencies with the potential for
      subsequent enforcement actions by the appropriate NRC regional of fice. - During
      this period, the NRC also received significant feedback from several utilities
      and from the Nuclear Management and Resources Council questioning the
      regulatory basis for the CGI dedication guidance contained in NRC Generic
      Letter 91-05 as well as specific interpretations of that guidance by the NRC
        inspection teams.
        In order for the NRC to properly respond to these concerns and to resolve
      major points of contention cencerning the CGI dedication process we will be
      holding public meetings with individual utilities and conducting a public
      workshop which will address issues concerning-the existing dedication guidance
      and specific interpretations of that guidance. Prior to the public workshop,
      the proposed ir.spection procedure for future inspections will be issued for
      public comment and discussion at the workshop.
      In view of these pending actions, the specific observations concerning your
      CGI dedication programs and implementation are classified as " findings."
      Because of the need for additional discussion of the appropriate guidance for
      dedication of CGis, no enforcement action will be taken based on any of the
      five pilot inspections. It should be recognized, however, that some of these
      findings may require corrective action-based on: (1) their potential impact on
      the performance of specific equipment. -or (2) because of noncompliance with
      your commitments to specific industry standards or regulatory guides endorsing
      such standards. We expect that-you will evaluate the inspection findings in
      view of these considerations and take appropriate corrective action as
      necessary.
      In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of
      this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the NRC's Public Document
      Room.
            -.      _
                          ,                          .-  -      -                -          .


                                            _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _                         _ _ .
_ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _
          '
_ _ .
            ...
'
              '
...
                  .
'
                    -
.
      .
-
        ;
      ,
                                                                                                                                                                                                              December 8, 1992
    /-
.
.
                      Mr. Lee Liu                                                                           -3-
;
                      Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased
December 8, 1992
                      to discuss them with you. Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.
,
                                                                                                      Sincerely,
/-
                                                                                                                              /
Mr. Lee Liu
                                                                                                              h
-3-
                                                                                                      Jack W. Roe, Director
.
                                                                                                      Division of Reactor Projects 111, IV, V
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased
                                                                                                      Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
to discuss them with you.
                        Enclosure:
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.
                        Inspection Report 50-331/92-201
Sincerely,
                        cc w/ enclosure:     see next page
/
                        DISTRIBUTION
h
                        Docket files 50-331/ Central Files / RIDS IE:09                                                                                                   CHehl, RI
Jack W. Roe, Director
                        PDR         WHodges, R1                         LPDR                                                           EMerschoff, Rll
Division of Reactor Projects 111, IV, V
                        VIB R/F     AGibson, Ril                         DRIS R/F                                                       GWright, Rlll
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
                        JRoe         BBurgess, Rlll                       WRussell                                                       HMiller, Rlli
Enclosure:
                        FMiraglia   EGreenman, Rlll                     ERossi                                                         RLangstaff, Rill
Inspection Report 50-331/92-201
                        LNorrholm   LCallan, RIV                         UPotapovs                                                       SCollins, RIV
cc w/ enclosure:
                        RPettis     RZimmerman                           SAlexander GGrant, OEDO
see next page
                        LCampbell   JZwolinski                           SMagruder                                                       KPerkins, RV
DISTRIBUTION
                        GCwalina     RPul si fer                         RMcIntyre                                                       CVanDenburgh, OE                                                                                 ,hb
Docket files 50-331/ Central Files / RIDS IE:09
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          #
CHehl, RI
            o SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE                                                                                                                                                                                   3
PDR
            OFC       :RISl:VIB:DRil :RIS2:VIB:DRIL :RISl:VIB:DRll :RIS2:VIB:DRil : REG 10lFill                                                                                                                                 :REdl\h III g
WHodges, R1
            NAME :RPettis               :SAlexander                     :LCamobell                                                                   :SMaaruder                                                 :RLanastaff   :GWrioht ,.
LPDR
            DATE :7/30/92*               :7/28/92*                       :7/20/92*                                                                     :7/22/92*                                                 : ll /h'920tkl :ll/ h /92]pN
EMerschoff, Rll
            OFC       :SC:RISl:VIB ,:VIB                       :NRR : TECH EDITOR                                                               :DD:DkbRR :D:BRIL;4R                                                       AHNN N       ,*,uty
VIB R/F
            NAME :UPotapovs          f :LN;/rholm                       :R5anders                                                                 :RZimmermaniel :CTRokWN
AGibson, Ril
            DATE :8/05/92*          g(:I f/M/92                                                                                                                                                                               :WRuTsellM Z Q '
DRIS R/F
                                                                        :8/27/92*                                                                 :131I /92                                                     :121 2 /92   :W/ \/92a%
GWright, Rlll
            0FC       :PM:PD3-3: NR :PD:PD3                       NRR:AD:R3:                                                             iD:DRPW.:NRR
JRoe
            NAME :1RPul si f4r'         :dHannon                     :J7wolinski                                                 (fJRoe P
BBurgess, Rlll
            DATE :ll/L /92               : 11M, /92                   :11q/92                                                     "h 12]? /92
WRussell
  __             -                                               __       _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
HMiller, Rlli
FMiraglia
EGreenman, Rlll
ERossi
RLangstaff, Rill
LNorrholm
LCallan, RIV
UPotapovs
SCollins, RIV
RPettis
RZimmerman
SAlexander GGrant, OEDO
LCampbell
JZwolinski
SMagruder
KPerkins, RV
GCwalina
RPul si fer
RMcIntyre
CVanDenburgh, OE
,hb
o SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
#
3
OFC
:RISl:VIB:DRil :RIS2:VIB:DRIL :RISl:VIB:DRll :RIS2:VIB:DRil : REG 10lFill
:REdl\\h III
g
NAME :RPettis
:SAlexander
:LCamobell
:SMaaruder
:RLanastaff
:GWrioht ,.
ll /h'920tkl :ll/ h /92]pN
DATE :7/30/92*
:7/28/92*
:7/20/92*
:7/22/92*
:
OFC
:SC:RISl:VIB ,:VIB
:NRR : TECH EDITOR
:DD:DkbRR
:D:BRIL;4R
AHNN N
,*,uty
f :LN;/rholm
:R5anders
:RZimmermaniel :CTRokWN
:WRuTsellM Z Q '
NAME :UPotapovs
g(:I f/M/92
DATE :8/05/92*
:8/27/92*
:131I /92
:121 2 /92
:W/ \\/92a%
0FC
:PM:PD3-3: NR :PD:PD3
NRR:AD:R3:
iD:DRPW.:NRR
NAME :1RPul si f4r'
:dHannon
:J7wolinski
(fJRoe P
DATE :ll/L /92
: 11M, /92
:11q/92
"h 12]? /92
__
-
__
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -


    , e '+
, e '+
          .
.
                                                                                December 8, 1992
December 8, 1992
            Mr. Lee Liu                                 -3-
Mr. Lee Liu
            Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased
-3-
            to discuss them with you. Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased
                                                        Sincerely,
to discuss them with you. Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.
                                                              /         ,
Sincerely,
                                                          f   _-''
/
                                                        Jack W. Roe, Director
,
                                                        Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V
f
                                                        Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
_-''
            Enclosure:
Jack W. Roe, Director
Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 50-331/92-201
l
l
            Inspection Report 50-331/92-201
cc w/ enclosure:
            cc w/ enclosure:     see next page
see next page
            D_lSTRIBUTICI!
D_lSTRIBUTICI!
            Docket Files 50-331/ Central Files / RIDS IE:09             CHehl, RI
Docket Files 50-331/ Central Files / RIDS IE:09
            PDR           WHodges, RI         LPDR           EMerschoff, Rll
CHehl, RI
            VIB R/F       AGibson, RII         DRIS R/F       GWright, RIII
PDR
            JRoe           BBurgess, Rill       WRussell       HMiller, RllI
WHodges, RI
            FMiraglia     EGreenman, Rill     ERossi         RLangstaff, RIII
LPDR
            LNorrholm     LCallan, RIV         UPotapovs     SCollins, RIV
EMerschoff, Rll
            RPettis       RZimmerman           SAlexander GGrant, OEDO
VIB R/F
            LCampbell     JZwolinski           SMagruder     KPerkins, RV
AGibson, RII
            GCwalina       RPulsifer           RMcIntyre     CVanDenburgh, OE                               V,Jk     t,
DRIS R/F
  * SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE                                                               .                       1
GWright, RIII
                                                                                                                      c/
JRoe
                                                                                            L,            6   F       @
BBurgess, Rill
  OFC     :RISl:VIB:DRIL :RIS2:VIB:DRIL :RISl:VIB:DRil :RIS2:VIB:DRIL : REG 10A'III                   :REdliiNIII[p
WRussell
  NAME :RPettis                 :SAlexander     :LCampbell         :SMaaruder         :RLannstaff     :GWriaht . .     I
HMiller, RllI
  DATE :7/30/92*               :7/28/92*       :7/20/92*           :7/22/92*         :
FMiraglia
                                                                                        ll/H'92h1J :11/h /92p',5
EGreenman, Rill
  0FC     :SC:RISl:VIB ,:VIBHfd:NRR : TECH EDITOR               :DD:D             :D;DRil NR       TYNd N
ERossi
  NAME :UPotapovs
RLangstaff, RIII
                                                                              RR                                  - Q' '
LNorrholm
                            I/: LN/rholm       :RSanders         :RZimmerman H :CTR5ksh           :WRuTselle Z %*
LCallan, RIV
  DATE :8/05/92*           /) :l f//'f/92     :8/27/92*         :ll/l /92         :12] 2 /92
UPotapovs
                                                                                    ~            : kf/ \ L92"*lO
SCollins, RIV
                      /3,T                           y                                                       cPR
RPettis
  OFC     : PM: PD3-3 :tlRR' :PD:PD3-3.NRR:AD:R3:DR V         :D:DRPW.:NRR                                       %
RZimmerman
  NAME ::RPulsif6f             :JHannon     :JZwolinski     ifJRoe V"
SAlexander GGrant, OEDO
  DATE :11/_L/92               :11./q/92     :11q/92         "H 11/f /92
LCampbell
                            1000$
JZwolinski
SMagruder
KPerkins, RV
GCwalina
RPulsifer
RMcIntyre
CVanDenburgh, OE
V,Jk
t,c/
* SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
.
1
:REdliiNIII[p
6
F
@
L,
OFC
:RISl:VIB:DRIL :RIS2:VIB:DRIL :RISl:VIB:DRil :RIS2:VIB:DRIL : REG 10A'III
NAME :RPettis
:SAlexander
:LCampbell
:SMaaruder
:RLannstaff
:GWriaht . .
I
ll/H'92h1J :11/h /92p',5
DATE :7/30/92*
:7/28/92*
:7/20/92*
:7/22/92*
:
0FC
:SC:RISl:VIB ,:VIBHfd:NRR : TECH EDITOR
:DD:D
RR
:D;DRil NR
TYNd N
- Q'
NAME :UPotapovs
I/: LN/rholm
:RSanders
:RZimmerman H :CTR5ksh
:WRuTselle Z
'
%*
DATE :8/05/92*
/) :l f//'f/92
:8/27/92*
:ll/l /92
:12] 2 /92
: kf/ \\ L92"*lO
/3,T
y
~
cPR
OFC
: PM: PD3-3 :tlRR' :PD:PD3-3.NRR:AD:R3:DR V
:D:DRPW.:NRR
%
NAME ::RPulsif6f
:JHannon
:JZwolinski
ifJRoe V"
DATE :11/_L/92
:11./q/92
:11q/92
"H 11/f /92
1000$
,
,


                    .         .                   _
.
      *
.
  .' .
_
        .
.'
  *
*
          Mr. Lee Liu                         -3-
.
          Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased-
.
          to discuss them with you. Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.
Mr. Lee Liu
                                            Sincerely,
-3-
                                                    M
*
                                            Jack W. Roe, Director
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased-
                                            D$ vision of Reactor Projects III, IV, V
to discuss them with you. Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.
                                            Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Sincerely,
          Enclosure:
M
          Inspection Report 50-331/92-201
Jack W. Roe, Director
          cc w/ enclosure: see next page
D$ vision of Reactor Projects III, IV, V
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 50-331/92-201
cc w/ enclosure:
see next page
;
;
l
l
                                                                                        .
.
- -
-
-


-           ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
-
  j. -
___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
          .
j.
  ,-
-
                                                        _4
.
      Mr. Lee Liu
,-
      lowa Electric Light and Power Company               Duane Arnold Energy Center
_4
      Jack Newman, Esquire
Mr. Lee Liu
      Kathleen H. Shea, Esquire
lowa Electric Light and Power Company
      Newman and Holtzinger
Duane Arnold Energy Center
      1615 L Street, N.W.
Jack Newman, Esquire
      Washington, D.C.                           20036
Kathleen H. Shea, Esquire
      Chairman, Linn County
Newman and Holtzinger
      Board of Supervisors
1615 L Street, N.W.
      Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52406
Washington, D.C.
        lowa Electric Light and Power Company
20036
        ATTN:                           David L. Wilson
Chairman, Linn County
        Plant Superintendent, Nuclear
Board of Supervisors
        3277 DAEC Road
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52406
        Palo, Iowa 52324
lowa Electric Light and Power Company
        Mr. John F. Franz, Jr.
ATTN:
        Vice President, Nuclear
David L. Wilson
        Duane Arnold Energy Center
Plant Superintendent, Nuclear
        3277 DAEC Road
3277 DAEC Road
        Palo, Iowa 52324
Palo, Iowa 52324
        Mr Keith Young
Mr. John F. Franz, Jr.
        Manager, Nuclear Licensing
Vice President, Nuclear
        Duane Arnold Energy Center
Duane Arnold Energy Center
        3277 DAEC Road
3277 DAEC Road
        Palo, Iowa 52324
Palo, Iowa 52324
        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                         -
Mr Keith Young
        Resident inspector's Office
Manager, Nuclear Licensing
        Rural Route #1
Duane Arnold Energy Center
        Palo, Iowa 52324
3277 DAEC Road
        Regional Administrator, Region Ill
Palo, Iowa 52324
        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
        799 Roosevelt Road
-
        Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
Resident inspector's Office
        Mr. Stephen N. Brown                                                                         -
Rural Route #1
        Utilities Division
Palo, Iowa 52324
        Iowa Department of Cammerce
Regional Administrator, Region Ill
        Lucas Office Building, 5th Floor
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
        Des Moines, Iowa 50319
799 Roosevelt Road
                                                                                      . _ - _ _ _ -
Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
Mr. Stephen N. Brown
-
Utilities Division
Iowa Department of Cammerce
Lucas Office Building, 5th Floor
Des Moines, Iowa 50319
.
_ - _ _ _ -
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:50, 12 December 2024

Forwards Insp Rept 50-331/92-201 on 920511-15.Violations Noted
ML20125C342
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/08/1992
From: Roe J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Leslie Liu
IES UTILITIES INC., (FORMERLY IOWA ELECTRIC LIGHT
Shared Package
ML20125C345 List:
References
NUDOCS 9212110153
Download: ML20125C342 (6)


See also: IR 05000331/1992201

Text

.'

'

'

-

y[f uc,gh

, # ,g ;n

UNITED STATES

s,

+'y

i

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

o h QQ !

WASHINGTON, D C. 20565

f

'%;

December 8, 1992

Docket No. 50-331

lowa Electric Light

and Power Company

byd"Q

E

ATTN:

Mr. Lee Liu

..

V'

Chairman of the Board

yd

and Chief Executive Officer

,

IE Towers

-.e

.. , , i

P.O. Box 35)

i $$

Cedar Rapids, IA 52406

lL *f$ '

f

'D

Dear Mr. Liu:

SUBJECT:

INSPECTION OF THE PROCUREMENT AND COMMERCIAL GRADE DEDICATION

PROGRAMS AT THE DUANE ARN0LD ENERGY CENTER (REPORT NO.

50-331/92-201)

This letter transmits the report of the inspection conducted May 11

through 15, 1992, at Iowa Electric Light and Power (IELP) Company's Duane

Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) by R. Pettis, S. Alexander, L. Camobell, and

S. Magruder of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Vendor Inspection

Branch (VIB) and R. Langstaff of NRC Region III.

The inspection was related

to activities at the plant site authorized by NRC license DPR-49. At the

conclusion of the inspection, we discussed our findings with Mr. J. Franz,

Vice President, and the other members of your staff identified in Section 5

i

of the enclosed inspection report.

~

The inspection was conducted to review the implementation of IELP's program -

for the procure,ent and dedication o.f commercial grade items (CGIs) used in

safety-related

alications at DAEC. The inspection team identified a major

program strer,

in that IELP's policy was to purchase safety-related spare

and replacement items from original equipment manufacturers with approved

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, quality assurance programs when available, thus

reducing the number of items that need to be purchased commercial grade and

detlicated fcr use in safety-related applications. Another strength identified

was IELP's receipt inspection and testing capabilities for performing material

verification which are perform (d by independent quality control inspectors

qualified to ANS! N45.2.6.

The results of the inspection also indicate that some weaknesses existed

within IELP's program for the dedication of CGIs procured for use in safety-

related applications.

These weaknesses contributed to the specific findings

that were identified during the review of dedication files for CGIs installed

or available for installation in safety-related plant systems.

Examples of

these findings are that IELP did not fully verify the material of certain

CGIs, did not have provisions to fully assure material traceability and lot

homogeneity when using statistical sampling plans, did not properly classify

9212110153 921208

A

PDR

ADOCK 0S00

1

. .

-.

-s

,

.

.

Mr. Lee Liu

-2-

certain valve and pump parts when using a generic classification approach, and

did not assure the calibration and control-of certain test equipment used in

the dedication process.

It should be noted that the inspection team selected

for review equipment from DAEC's safety-related component list and made no

further attempts to assess individual component contribution to the system's

safety-related function,

lhis was the fourth of a series of five pilot inspections being ccoducted to

evaluate the implementation of licensee- CGI procurement and dedication

programs and to finalize an inspection procedure for future inspections of

this type.

The other four inspections also identified certain weaknesses in

licensee CGI deaication programs and their implementation.

The first three

inspections classified these weaknesses as deficiencies with the potential for

subsequent enforcement actions by the appropriate NRC regional of fice. - During

this period, the NRC also received significant feedback from several utilities

and from the Nuclear Management and Resources Council questioning the

regulatory basis for the CGI dedication guidance contained in NRC Generic Letter 91-05 as well as specific interpretations of that guidance by the NRC

inspection teams.

In order for the NRC to properly respond to these concerns and to resolve

major points of contention cencerning the CGI dedication process we will be

holding public meetings with individual utilities and conducting a public

workshop which will address issues concerning-the existing dedication guidance

and specific interpretations of that guidance.

Prior to the public workshop,

the proposed ir.spection procedure for future inspections will be issued for

public comment and discussion at the workshop.

In view of these pending actions, the specific observations concerning your

CGI dedication programs and implementation are classified as " findings."

Because of the need for additional discussion of the appropriate guidance for

dedication of CGis, no enforcement action will be taken based on any of the

five pilot inspections.

It should be recognized, however, that some of these

findings may require corrective action-based on: (1) their potential impact on

the performance of specific equipment. -or (2) because of noncompliance with

your commitments to specific industry standards or regulatory guides endorsing

such standards.

We expect that-you will evaluate the inspection findings in

view of these considerations and take appropriate corrective action as

necessary.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of

this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the NRC's Public Document

Room.

-.

_

,

.-

-

-

-

.

_ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _

_ _ .

'

...

'

.

-

.

December 8, 1992

,

/-

Mr. Lee Liu

-3-

.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased

to discuss them with you.

Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.

Sincerely,

/

h

Jack W. Roe, Director

Division of Reactor Projects 111, IV, V

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 50-331/92-201

cc w/ enclosure:

see next page

DISTRIBUTION

Docket files 50-331/ Central Files / RIDS IE:09

CHehl, RI

PDR

WHodges, R1

LPDR

EMerschoff, Rll

VIB R/F

AGibson, Ril

DRIS R/F

GWright, Rlll

JRoe

BBurgess, Rlll

WRussell

HMiller, Rlli

FMiraglia

EGreenman, Rlll

ERossi

RLangstaff, Rill

LNorrholm

LCallan, RIV

UPotapovs

SCollins, RIV

RPettis

RZimmerman

SAlexander GGrant, OEDO

LCampbell

JZwolinski

SMagruder

KPerkins, RV

GCwalina

RPul si fer

RMcIntyre

CVanDenburgh, OE

,hb

o SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

3

OFC

RISl:VIB:DRil :RIS2:VIB:DRIL :RISl:VIB:DRll :RIS2:VIB:DRil : REG 10lFill
REdl\\h III

g

NAME :RPettis

SAlexander
LCamobell
SMaaruder
RLanastaff
GWrioht ,.

ll /h'920tkl :ll/ h /92]pN

DATE :7/30/92*

7/28/92*
7/20/92*
7/22/92*

OFC

SC:RISl:VIB ,:VIB
NRR : TECH EDITOR
DD:DkbRR
D:BRIL;4R

AHNN N

,*,uty

f :LN;/rholm

R5anders
RZimmermaniel :CTRokWN
WRuTsellM Z Q '

NAME :UPotapovs

g(:I f/M/92

DATE :8/05/92*

8/27/92*
131I /92
121 2 /92
W/ \\/92a%

0FC

PM:PD3-3: NR :PD:PD3

NRR:AD:R3:

iD:DRPW.:NRR

NAME :1RPul si f4r'

dHannon
J7wolinski

(fJRoe P

DATE :ll/L /92

11M, /92
11q/92

"h 12]? /92

__

-

__

_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

, e '+

.

December 8, 1992

Mr. Lee Liu

-3-

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased

to discuss them with you. Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.

Sincerely,

/

,

f

_-

Jack W. Roe, Director

Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 50-331/92-201

l

cc w/ enclosure:

see next page

D_lSTRIBUTICI!

Docket Files 50-331/ Central Files / RIDS IE:09

CHehl, RI

PDR

WHodges, RI

LPDR

EMerschoff, Rll

VIB R/F

AGibson, RII

DRIS R/F

GWright, RIII

JRoe

BBurgess, Rill

WRussell

HMiller, RllI

FMiraglia

EGreenman, Rill

ERossi

RLangstaff, RIII

LNorrholm

LCallan, RIV

UPotapovs

SCollins, RIV

RPettis

RZimmerman

SAlexander GGrant, OEDO

LCampbell

JZwolinski

SMagruder

KPerkins, RV

GCwalina

RPulsifer

RMcIntyre

CVanDenburgh, OE

V,Jk

t,c/

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

.

1

REdliiNIII[p

6

F

@

L,

OFC

RISl:VIB:DRIL :RIS2:VIB:DRIL :RISl:VIB:DRil :RIS2:VIB:DRIL : REG 10A'III

NAME :RPettis

SAlexander
LCampbell
SMaaruder
RLannstaff
GWriaht . .

I

ll/H'92h1J :11/h /92p',5

DATE :7/30/92*

7/28/92*
7/20/92*
7/22/92*

0FC

SC:RISl:VIB ,:VIBHfd:NRR : TECH EDITOR
DD:D

RR

D;DRil NR

TYNd N

- Q'

NAME :UPotapovs

I/: LN/rholm

RSanders
RZimmerman H :CTR5ksh
WRuTselle Z

'

%*

DATE :8/05/92*

/) :l f//'f/92

8/27/92*
ll/l /92
12] 2 /92
kf/ \\ L92"*lO

/3,T

y

~

cPR

OFC

PM: PD3-3 :tlRR' :PD:PD3-3.NRR:AD:R3:DR V
D:DRPW.:NRR

%

NAME ::RPulsif6f

JHannon
JZwolinski

ifJRoe V"

DATE :11/_L/92

11./q/92
11q/92

"H 11/f /92

1000$

,

.

.

_

.'

.

.

Mr. Lee Liu

-3-

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased-

to discuss them with you. Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection.

Sincerely,

M

Jack W. Roe, Director

D$ vision of Reactor Projects III, IV, V

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 50-331/92-201

cc w/ enclosure:

see next page

l

.

- -

-

-

-

___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _

j.

-

.

,-

_4

Mr. Lee Liu

lowa Electric Light and Power Company

Duane Arnold Energy Center

Jack Newman, Esquire

Kathleen H. Shea, Esquire

Newman and Holtzinger

1615 L Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036

Chairman, Linn County

Board of Supervisors

Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52406

lowa Electric Light and Power Company

ATTN:

David L. Wilson

Plant Superintendent, Nuclear

3277 DAEC Road

Palo, Iowa 52324

Mr. John F. Franz, Jr.

Vice President, Nuclear

Duane Arnold Energy Center

3277 DAEC Road

Palo, Iowa 52324

Mr Keith Young

Manager, Nuclear Licensing

Duane Arnold Energy Center

3277 DAEC Road

Palo, Iowa 52324

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

-

Resident inspector's Office

Rural Route #1

Palo, Iowa 52324

Regional Administrator, Region Ill

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

799 Roosevelt Road

Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Mr. Stephen N. Brown

-

Utilities Division

Iowa Department of Cammerce

Lucas Office Building, 5th Floor

Des Moines, Iowa 50319

.

_ - _ _ _ -