ML20133C564: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:s r                 '
{{#Wiki_filter:s r
: n.    -                    ,
/,
/,
n.
          * 'b8?og O
(
(
UNITED STATES
(
(
g             g                   NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g                                REGloN lit f[ * -         ,p                          799 ROOSEVELT ROAD GLEN I"tLYN, ILLINolS 60137 7,,
* 'b8?og O
k *****40'g July 29, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR:   James G. Keppler, Regional' Administrator, Region'III FROM:             R. L. Spessard, Director, Division of Engineering
UNITED STATES g
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f[ * -
g REGloN lit 799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
,p GLEN I"tLYN, ILLINolS 60137 7,,
0'g k *****4 July 29, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR:
James G. Keppler, Regional' Administrator, Region'III FROM:
R. L. Spessard, Director, Division of Engineering


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
RESULTS OF OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS As requested in your memo of June 28, 1983, attached is the first report of the Operator Licensing Section activities.
RESULTS OF OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS As requested in your memo of June 28, 1983, attached is the first report of the Operator Licensing Section activities.
The report is divided into three sections:
The report is divided into three sections:
Section A:             Quarterly report of examinations administered by facility.
Section A:
Section B:             Summary of quarterly activities by budget unit.
Quarterly report of examinations administered by facility.
Section C:             Summary of fiscal year to ddte activities by budget unit.
Section B:
By way of historical information, the pre-TMI passing rate for all types of examinations nationwide was approximately 90%. For the ten month period after May 1980, when the criteria for passing the NRC examination was changed, the passing rate fell to approximately 70%. In January of 1982, the NRC changed the format of the written examinations. The new reactor operator written exam contained five sections instead of the former eight parts and the new senior                   -
Summary of quarterly activities by budget unit.
examination would also contain five parte instead of six sections. In addition, the point distribution among the sections was changed so that Sections 1 and 6 were to be 15% of the exam; Sections 2 and 7 were 10% and each of the other sections were 25% each. Because of the passing criteria, i.e., 80% overall and not less than 70% in any one section, Sections 1, 2, 6, and 7 were contributing somewhat more to the failure rates than was warrented. This did account for some of the higher than usual failure rates during the past year. The exam format was changed again in May 1983 to four sections in each exam and with each section worth 25%.
Section C:
Summary of fiscal year to ddte activities by budget unit.
By way of historical information, the pre-TMI passing rate for all types of examinations nationwide was approximately 90%. For the ten month period after May 1980, when the criteria for passing the NRC examination was changed, the passing rate fell to approximately 70%.
In January of 1982, the NRC changed the format of the written examinations. The new reactor operator written exam contained five sections instead of the former eight parts and the new senior examination would also contain five parte instead of six sections.
In addition, the point distribution among the sections was changed so that Sections 1 and 6 were to be 15% of the exam; Sections 2 and 7 were 10% and each of the other sections were 25% each.
Because of the passing criteria, i.e., 80% overall and not less than 70% in any one section, Sections 1, 2, 6, and 7 were contributing somewhat more to the failure rates than was warrented. This did account for some of the higher than usual failure rates during the past year. The exam format was changed again in May 1983 to four sections in each exam and with each section worth 25%.
Since that time, the passing rate nationwide has increased to about 80%.
Since that time, the passing rate nationwide has increased to about 80%.
You will note unusually low passing rates for D. C. Cook, Palisades, Quad Cities, Byron, LaSalle, and Point Beach. In some cases,             i.e., Point Beach and Quad Cities, the sample size is too small to be a meaningful indication of the quality of the training program. In other cases, i.e., Palisades and LaSalle, changes were made in the training organizations during the past year that may have had an effect on the exam results. We have discussed the results of the exams with personnel from these facilities as well as the others with low passing rates in order to assist them in taking action to improve their training programs.
You will note unusually low passing rates for D. C. Cook, Palisades, Quad Cities, Byron, LaSalle, and Point Beach. In some cases, i.e., Point Beach and Quad Cities, the sample size is too small to be a meaningful indication of the quality of the training program. In other cases, i.e., Palisades and LaSalle, changes were made in the training organizations during the past year that may have had an effect on the exam results. We have discussed the results of the exams with personnel from these facilities as well as the others with low passing rates in order to assist them in taking action to improve their training programs.
8507200528 G50528 PDR     FOIA HARTMANRS-23A       PDR
8507200528 G50528 PDR FOIA HARTMANRS-23A PDR


c James G. Keppler                         2                       July 29, 1983 We have included in Sections'B and C of the report the number of renewal applications received and the renewal licenses issued. This is not a decision unit in the budget but does represent an administrative burden since all information associated with these applications must be entered in the Operator Licensing Tracking System (OLTS).
c James G. Keppler 2
July 29, 1983 We have included in Sections'B and C of the report the number of renewal applications received and the renewal licenses issued. This is not a decision unit in the budget but does represent an administrative burden since all information associated with these applications must be entered in the Operator Licensing Tracking System (OLTS).
W-Y R. L. Spessard, Director Division of Engineering Attachments: As stated e
W-Y R. L. Spessard, Director Division of Engineering Attachments: As stated e


        ;                        I                               (
I
Section A SRO and RO Examination Report 3rd Quarter FY 83 TYPE OF         NO.                                                                     NO.     %
(
FACILITY                   EXAM     -    EXAMS                                                           PASSED         PASSED Duane Arnold                             RO             6                                                                       6   100%
Section A SRO and RO Examination Report 3rd Quarter FY 83 TYPE OF NO.
SRO             2                                                                       2   100%
NO.
Donald C. Cook                           R0           15                                                                         6     40%
FACILITY EXAM EXAMS PASSED PASSED Duane Arnold RO 6
SRO             6                                                                       5     83%
6 100%
Palisades                               RO             5                                                                       3     60%
SRO 2
SRO             5                                                                       3     60%
2 100%
Zion                                   RO             4                                                                       4   100%
Donald C. Cook R0 15 6
SRO             8                                                                       7     87%
40%
                                                                                                                                                  ~
SRO 6
Quad Cities                           SRO             3                                                                       1   .33%
5 83%
La Crosse                               RO             5                                                                       5   100%
Palisades RO 5
SRO             5                                                                       5   100%
3 60%
Byron                                   RO           25                                                                       11     44%
SRO 5
SRO           34                                                                       14     41%
3 60%
Monticello                             SRO             4                                                                       3     75%
Zion RO 4
LaSalle                                 RO             4                                                                       3     75%
4 100%
SRO             7                                                                       4     57%     ,
SRO 8
Dresden                                 RO             4                                                                       3     75%
7 87%
SRO             2                                                                       2   100%
Quad Cities SRO 3
Point Beach                           SRO             2                                                                         1   50%
1
Requal           2                                                                       2   100%
.33%
Davis-Besse                           SRO             4                                                                       4   100%
~
Fermi                                   RO             8                                                                       7     87%
La Crosse RO 5
SRO           15                                                                       15   100%
5 100%
University of Illinois                   R0             2                                                                       2   100%
SRO 5
G. E. Training Center             Instructors         6                                                                       6   100%
5 100%
Westinghouse Training Center       Instructors         6                                                                       6   100%
Byron RO 25 11 44%
SRO 34 14 41%
Monticello SRO 4
3 75%
LaSalle RO 4
3 75%
SRO 7
4 57%
Dresden RO 4
3 75%
SRO 2
2 100%
Point Beach SRO 2
1 50%
Requal 2
2 100%
Davis-Besse SRO 4
4 100%
Fermi RO 8
7 87%
SRO 15 15 100%
University of Illinois R0 2
2 100%
G. E. Training Center Instructors 6
6 100%
Westinghouse Training Center Instructors 6
6 100%


;, V -
(''
(''
    ,    ;, V -            .
(
s                                     (
s Section B Sununary of Examinations Administered 3rd Quarter FY 83 SRO RO TYPE OF EXAM NO.
* Section B Sununary of Examinations Administered 3rd Quarter FY 83 SRO                     %        RO         %
PASSED
TYPE OF EXAM             NO.       PASSED           . PASSED NO. PASSED PASSED Initial                                     49           29               59% 33       18     54%
. PASSED NO.
R: placement                                 48           37               77% 43       30     69%
PASSED PASSED Initial 49 29 59%
R: qualification                               2             2           100% --        --
33 18 54%
Instructor Certification                     12           '12             100% N/A       N/A Nonpower                                    --            --              ----    2         2   100%
R: placement 48 37 77%
Renewals
43 30 69%
* 41           26                   15         16 Section C Summary of FY 83 to Date SRO                     %        RO         %    .
R: qualification 2
i                        TYPE OF EXAM             NO.       PASSED           PASSED NO. PASSED PASSED Initial                                     49           <14-dI 7           28% 33       tt/7   57%
2 100%
i Replacement                                 104           75               72% 90       58     64%
Instructor Certification 12
R: qualification                               2             2           100% --        --
'12 100%
In tructor Certification                     21           17               80% N/A       N/A Nonpower                                       3             2             66%   2         2 100%
N/A N/A 2
R:newals*                                   114         133                     61         58 k
2 100%
Nonpower Renewals
* 41 26 15 16 Section C Summary of FY 83 to Date SRO RO i
TYPE OF EXAM NO.
PASSED PASSED NO.
PASSED PASSED Initial 49
<14-dI 7 28%
33 tt/7 57%
i Replacement 104 75 72%
90 58 64%
R: qualification 2
2 100%
In tructor Certification 21 17 80%
N/A N/A Nonpower 3
2 66%
2 2
100%
R:newals*
114 133 61 58 k
CRenewals are not a budget unit and numbers represent applications received and licenses issued.}}
CRenewals are not a budget unit and numbers represent applications received and licenses issued.}}

Latest revision as of 08:56, 12 December 2024

Forwards Results of Operator Licensing Exams,Including Quarterly Rept of Exams Administered by Facility,Summary of Quarterly Activities by Budget Unit & Summary of Fiscal Yr to Date Activities
ML20133C564
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/29/1983
From: Spessard R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20132B617 List:
References
FOIA-85-236 NUDOCS 8507200528
Download: ML20133C564 (4)


Text

s r

/,

n.

(

(

  • 'b8?og O

UNITED STATES g

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f[ * -

g REGloN lit 799 ROOSEVELT ROAD

,p GLEN I"tLYN, ILLINolS 60137 7,,

0'g k *****4 July 29, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR:

James G. Keppler, Regional' Administrator, Region'III FROM:

R. L. Spessard, Director, Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

RESULTS OF OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS As requested in your memo of June 28, 1983, attached is the first report of the Operator Licensing Section activities.

The report is divided into three sections:

Section A:

Quarterly report of examinations administered by facility.

Section B:

Summary of quarterly activities by budget unit.

Section C:

Summary of fiscal year to ddte activities by budget unit.

By way of historical information, the pre-TMI passing rate for all types of examinations nationwide was approximately 90%. For the ten month period after May 1980, when the criteria for passing the NRC examination was changed, the passing rate fell to approximately 70%.

In January of 1982, the NRC changed the format of the written examinations. The new reactor operator written exam contained five sections instead of the former eight parts and the new senior examination would also contain five parte instead of six sections.

In addition, the point distribution among the sections was changed so that Sections 1 and 6 were to be 15% of the exam; Sections 2 and 7 were 10% and each of the other sections were 25% each.

Because of the passing criteria, i.e., 80% overall and not less than 70% in any one section, Sections 1, 2, 6, and 7 were contributing somewhat more to the failure rates than was warrented. This did account for some of the higher than usual failure rates during the past year. The exam format was changed again in May 1983 to four sections in each exam and with each section worth 25%.

Since that time, the passing rate nationwide has increased to about 80%.

You will note unusually low passing rates for D. C. Cook, Palisades, Quad Cities, Byron, LaSalle, and Point Beach. In some cases, i.e., Point Beach and Quad Cities, the sample size is too small to be a meaningful indication of the quality of the training program. In other cases, i.e., Palisades and LaSalle, changes were made in the training organizations during the past year that may have had an effect on the exam results. We have discussed the results of the exams with personnel from these facilities as well as the others with low passing rates in order to assist them in taking action to improve their training programs.

8507200528 G50528 PDR FOIA HARTMANRS-23A PDR

c James G. Keppler 2

July 29, 1983 We have included in Sections'B and C of the report the number of renewal applications received and the renewal licenses issued. This is not a decision unit in the budget but does represent an administrative burden since all information associated with these applications must be entered in the Operator Licensing Tracking System (OLTS).

W-Y R. L. Spessard, Director Division of Engineering Attachments: As stated e

I

(

Section A SRO and RO Examination Report 3rd Quarter FY 83 TYPE OF NO.

NO.

FACILITY EXAM EXAMS PASSED PASSED Duane Arnold RO 6

6 100%

SRO 2

2 100%

Donald C. Cook R0 15 6

40%

SRO 6

5 83%

Palisades RO 5

3 60%

SRO 5

3 60%

Zion RO 4

4 100%

SRO 8

7 87%

Quad Cities SRO 3

1

.33%

~

La Crosse RO 5

5 100%

SRO 5

5 100%

Byron RO 25 11 44%

SRO 34 14 41%

Monticello SRO 4

3 75%

LaSalle RO 4

3 75%

SRO 7

4 57%

Dresden RO 4

3 75%

SRO 2

2 100%

Point Beach SRO 2

1 50%

Requal 2

2 100%

Davis-Besse SRO 4

4 100%

Fermi RO 8

7 87%

SRO 15 15 100%

University of Illinois R0 2

2 100%

G. E. Training Center Instructors 6

6 100%

Westinghouse Training Center Instructors 6

6 100%

, V -

(

(

s Section B Sununary of Examinations Administered 3rd Quarter FY 83 SRO RO TYPE OF EXAM NO.

PASSED

. PASSED NO.

PASSED PASSED Initial 49 29 59%

33 18 54%

R: placement 48 37 77%

43 30 69%

R: qualification 2

2 100%

Instructor Certification 12

'12 100%

N/A N/A 2

2 100%

Nonpower Renewals

  • 41 26 15 16 Section C Summary of FY 83 to Date SRO RO i

TYPE OF EXAM NO.

PASSED PASSED NO.

PASSED PASSED Initial 49

<14-dI 7 28%

33 tt/7 57%

i Replacement 104 75 72%

90 58 64%

R: qualification 2

2 100%

In tructor Certification 21 17 80%

N/A N/A Nonpower 3

2 66%

2 2

100%

R:newals*

114 133 61 58 k

CRenewals are not a budget unit and numbers represent applications received and licenses issued.