ML20084F144: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:, | {{#Wiki_filter:, | ||
P.O. DOX 3100 MIAMI, FLotlOA *1101 | P.O. DOX 3100 MIAMI, FLotlOA *1101 | ||
~ ~ ' '* >.- | ~ ~ ' '* >.- | ||
.o n | |||
O cw y | |||
c | |||
'"''we ',Q i. | |||
J J | |||
Mr. Norman C. Moseley, Director Region II | L.. | ||
Office of Inspection and Enforcement | A | ||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ) | ||
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY November 21, 1975 | |||
~ | |||
A Mr. Norman C. Moseley, Director Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement I | |||
J I9 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission E | |||
;q kggC 230 Peachtree Street, N.W., | |||
Suite 818 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 "2. | |||
==Dear Mr. Moseley:== | ==Dear Mr. Moseley:== | ||
,,, / | |||
ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE 251-75-11 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 | ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE 251-75-11 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 DATE OF OCCURRENCE: NOVEMBER 12, l'975 HIGH BORON CONCENTRATION IN THE "C" BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK | ||
DATE OF OCCURRENCE: NOVEMBER 12, l'975 HIGH BORON CONCENTRATION IN THE "C" BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK | ,A. | ||
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE The Unit 4 reactor was in steady state power operation at about 99% rated power. | |||
B. DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE | The Unit 3 reactor was in the refueling shutdown condition. | ||
B. | |||
At about 11:00 AM on November 12, 1975, it was verified that the boron concentration in the "C" Boric Acid Storage Tank (BAST) was above the upper limit defined in Technical Specification 3.6.b.3. The measured concentration was 22,600 ppm which was slightly above the upper limit of 22,500 ppm. | DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE | ||
C. DESIGNATION'OF APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE This occurrence was caused by the addition of a concentrated boric acid solution to the "C" BAST which was in-service at the time. | ~ | ||
DR Avocg o | At about 11:00 AM on November 12, 1975, it was verified that the boron concentration in the "C" Boric Acid Storage Tank (BAST) was above the upper limit defined in Technical Specification 3.6.b.3. | ||
The measured concentration was 22,600 ppm which was slightly above the upper limit of 22,500 ppm. | |||
C. | |||
DESIGNATION'OF APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE This occurrence was caused by the addition of a concentrated boric acid solution to the "C" BAST which was in-service at the time. | |||
The addition was made to increase the quantity of boric acid solution in the "C" BAST to ensure that it was well above the minimum quantity required by Technical Specifications for single reactor operation. | |||
Under normal operating conditions, the "B" BAST, which is normally iso-lated, would have been placed in-service and the "C" BAST (Continued) 8304200593 Qff DR Avocg o g | |||
HELPING BUILD FLORIDA | |||
O | O. | ||
O | O j_,. | ||
Mr. Norman C. Moseley | Mr. Norman C. Moseley i | ||
Page Two | November 21, 1975 Page Two would have been isolated prior to the chemical addition. | ||
However, maintenance on the 4A Boric Acid Transfer Pump suction valve necessitated a system valve lineup that prevented the "B" BAST from being placed in-service. | |||
However, maintenance on the 4A Boric Acid Transfer Pump suction valve necessitated a system valve lineup that | The action at this point would normally have been to complete the valve work and shift the in-service BAST, but the quantity of boric acid solution in the "C" 3AST was near the low limit specified for single reactor operation, therefore, the decision was made to proceed with trans-ferring the boric acid solution to the in-service "C" B;AST., | ||
prevented the "B" BAST from being placed in-service. The action at this point would normally have been to complete the valve work and shift the in-service BAST, but the quantity of boric acid solution in the "C" 3AST was near | Under the circumstances, a judgment was made that the con-1 j | ||
servative. action would be to add to the in-service BAST which could then be sampled and recirculated if-necessary to bring i | |||
the boron concentration into specification. | |||
D. | |||
D. ANALYSIS OF OCCURRENCE | ANALYSIS OF OCCURRENCE i | ||
i | i An increase in the boron concentration increases the j | ||
An increase in the boron concentration increases the j | potential for flow blockage caused by the possible j | ||
precipitation of boric acid. | |||
the high boron concentration increased the available negative reactivity in the "C" BAST, so the availability of the tank as a source of negative reactivity was not | During this occurrence, j | ||
checks of the boric acid system indicated there was no significant precipitation. | |||
E. CORRECTIVE ACTION 4 | Temperatures throughout the system were well above the saturation temperature for a boron solution concentration of 22,600 ppm. | ||
Primary grade water was added to the "C" BAST and the contents of the tank were recirculated to dilute the boron concentration. The tank was resampled at about 12:30 PM on November 12, and the boron concentration j | In addition, l | ||
Operating Procedure 2603.5 will be revised to include a j | the high boron concentration increased the available negative reactivity in the "C" BAST, so the availability of the tank as a source of negative reactivity was not reduced. | ||
Therefore, we conclude that the health and l | |||
safety of the public were not adversely affected by'this occurrence, l | |||
E. | |||
CORRECTIVE ACTION 4 | |||
Primary grade water was added to the "C" BAST and the contents of the tank were recirculated to dilute the boron concentration. | |||
The tank was resampled at about 12:30 PM on November 12, and the boron concentration j | |||
was found to be within specifications. | |||
Operating Procedure 2603.5 will be revised to include a j | |||
requirement to sample the Doric Acid Batching Tank to ensure that its boron concentration is within the BAST specification whenever it is necessary to add boric acid solution to an in-service BAST. | |||
(Continued) 9 1 | (Continued) 9 1 | ||
,..c,_...,_ | |||
._,y_...,, | |||
~m,vwmcv_..,7,_..,,.n-,7,,,.,-_,my.p....-~e,. | |||
,p_y.%,.y.,,,,, | |||
..w, | |||
.b-,...,r..,,..m_.,,,--,,..,,,,,,.. | |||
...mn | |||
, _, - ~. -., -. - | |||
~ | |||
o | o | ||
.o Mr. Norman C." Moseley November 21, 1975 Page Three F. | |||
FAILURE DATA There has been one previous occurrence involving high boron concentration in a BAST. | |||
Mr. Norman C." Moseley November 21, 1975 Page Three F. FAILURE DATA There has been one previous occurrence involving high boron concentration in a BAST. | It was reported as Abnormal Occurrence 250-73-10. | ||
Very truly yours, | Very truly yours, A jD. Schmidt Vice President Power Resources MAS / jar cc: | ||
A jD. Schmidt | Jack R. Newman, Esquire (40) | ||
Vice President Power Resources MAS / jar cc: | Director, Office of Inspection and-Enforcement Director, Office of Management Information and Program Control (3) o 4 | ||
Director, Office of Inspection and-Enforcement | = - | ||
Director, Office of Management Information and Program Control (3) o 4 | -m--- | ||
- - - ~.- | |||
,w | |||
,y,e- | |||
-~-. - - -.,,- | |||
,-r, | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 04:41, 14 December 2024
| ML20084F144 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point |
| Issue date: | 11/21/1975 |
| From: | Schmidt A FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Moseley N NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| AO-251-75-11, NUDOCS 8304200593 | |
| Download: ML20084F144 (3) | |
Text
,
P.O. DOX 3100 MIAMI, FLotlOA *1101
~ ~ ' '* >.-
.o n
O cw y
c
'"we ',Q i.
J J
L..
A
)
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY November 21, 1975
~
A Mr. Norman C. Moseley, Director Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement I
J I9 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission E
- q kggC 230 Peachtree Street, N.W.,
Suite 818 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 "2.
Dear Mr. Moseley:
,,, /
ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE 251-75-11 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 DATE OF OCCURRENCE: NOVEMBER 12, l'975 HIGH BORON CONCENTRATION IN THE "C" BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK
,A.
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE The Unit 4 reactor was in steady state power operation at about 99% rated power.
The Unit 3 reactor was in the refueling shutdown condition.
B.
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE
~
At about 11:00 AM on November 12, 1975, it was verified that the boron concentration in the "C" Boric Acid Storage Tank (BAST) was above the upper limit defined in Technical Specification 3.6.b.3.
The measured concentration was 22,600 ppm which was slightly above the upper limit of 22,500 ppm.
C.
DESIGNATION'OF APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE This occurrence was caused by the addition of a concentrated boric acid solution to the "C" BAST which was in-service at the time.
The addition was made to increase the quantity of boric acid solution in the "C" BAST to ensure that it was well above the minimum quantity required by Technical Specifications for single reactor operation.
Under normal operating conditions, the "B" BAST, which is normally iso-lated, would have been placed in-service and the "C" BAST (Continued) 8304200593 Qff DR Avocg o g
HELPING BUILD FLORIDA
O.
O j_,.
Mr. Norman C. Moseley i
November 21, 1975 Page Two would have been isolated prior to the chemical addition.
However, maintenance on the 4A Boric Acid Transfer Pump suction valve necessitated a system valve lineup that prevented the "B" BAST from being placed in-service.
The action at this point would normally have been to complete the valve work and shift the in-service BAST, but the quantity of boric acid solution in the "C" 3AST was near the low limit specified for single reactor operation, therefore, the decision was made to proceed with trans-ferring the boric acid solution to the in-service "C" B;AST.,
Under the circumstances, a judgment was made that the con-1 j
servative. action would be to add to the in-service BAST which could then be sampled and recirculated if-necessary to bring i
the boron concentration into specification.
D.
ANALYSIS OF OCCURRENCE i
i An increase in the boron concentration increases the j
potential for flow blockage caused by the possible j
precipitation of boric acid.
During this occurrence, j
checks of the boric acid system indicated there was no significant precipitation.
Temperatures throughout the system were well above the saturation temperature for a boron solution concentration of 22,600 ppm.
In addition, l
the high boron concentration increased the available negative reactivity in the "C" BAST, so the availability of the tank as a source of negative reactivity was not reduced.
Therefore, we conclude that the health and l
safety of the public were not adversely affected by'this occurrence, l
E.
CORRECTIVE ACTION 4
Primary grade water was added to the "C" BAST and the contents of the tank were recirculated to dilute the boron concentration.
The tank was resampled at about 12:30 PM on November 12, and the boron concentration j
was found to be within specifications.
Operating Procedure 2603.5 will be revised to include a j
requirement to sample the Doric Acid Batching Tank to ensure that its boron concentration is within the BAST specification whenever it is necessary to add boric acid solution to an in-service BAST.
(Continued) 9 1
,..c,_...,_
._,y_...,,
~m,vwmcv_..,7,_..,,.n-,7,,,.,-_,my.p....-~e,.
,p_y.%,.y.,,,,,
..w,
.b-,...,r..,,..m_.,,,--,,..,,,,,,..
...mn
, _, - ~. -., -. -
~
o
.o Mr. Norman C." Moseley November 21, 1975 Page Three F.
FAILURE DATA There has been one previous occurrence involving high boron concentration in a BAST.
It was reported as Abnormal Occurrence 250-73-10.
Very truly yours, A jD. Schmidt Vice President Power Resources MAS / jar cc:
Jack R. Newman, Esquire (40)
Director, Office of Inspection and-Enforcement Director, Office of Management Information and Program Control (3) o 4
= -
-m---
- - - ~.-
,w
,y,e-
-~-. - - -.,,-
,-r,
-