ML081500530

New York States Supplemental Citation in Support of Admission of Contention 26A

ML081500530
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	05/22/2008
From:	Jeremy Dean, Sipos J State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS E-105
Download: ML081500530 (13)

Text

UNiTED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC: SAFETY, LICENSING BOARD DOCKETED USNRC May 22, 2008 (2:42pm)

OFFICE OF. SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF

-X In re:

License Renewal Application Submitted by Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.07-858.03.LR-BD01 DPR-26, DPR-64 May 22,2008

-x NEW YORK STATE'S SUPPLEMENTAL CITATION IN SUPPORT OF ADMISSION OF CONTENTION-26A On May 14, 2008 - two weeks after the State of New York submitted its Reply to Entergy's Answer and NRC Staff's Response to New York's Supplemental Contention No.26-A (Metal Fatigue) - the NRC Staff posted on ADAMS a May 8, 2008 Summary of an April 3, 2008 telephone conference between Entergy and Staff regarding, inter alia, how much information NRC Staff would require Entergy to produce as part of its License Renewal Application.' The Summary is contained in Attachment 1 to this Supplement, and is also available at ML081190059. The May 8 Summary reveals that Entergy, with the acquiescence of Staff, does not intend to allow the details of how it will address metal fatigue issues to be made a part of this license renewal proceeding. Enclosure 1 to May 8, 2008 Summary of April 3, 2008 Telephone Conference, at pages 1 to 3.

This newly-disclosed information supplements the statements made by New York State in its May 1, 2008 Reply at the end of the first full paragraph on page 10.

IThe New York State Office of the Attorney General received a copy of the May 8, 2008 Summary via U.S.

Mail on May 19, 2008.

TE P, A 1FE Z) 3 9 S --ý) --)D

Respectfiilly submitted, May 22, 2008 Janice A.: Dean Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General forthe State ofNew York The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 (518) 402-2251 john.sipos@oag.state.ny.us Joan Leary Matthews Senior Attomey!,forSpecial Projects NewYork State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th floor Albany;, New York 12233-5500 (518) 402-9190 jhlnatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us John Louis Parker, Esq.

Regional Attorney New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Comers Rd New Paltz, NY 12561-1620

ATTACHMENT 1 NRC May 8,2008-Summary of an April 3, 2008 telephone conference between Entergy and NRC Staff also available at ML081190059

UNITED STATES NUCLFAR REGULATORY.COMMISSION May. 8, 2008 MA,-W, LICENSEE: Ent'Ny Nulear Operations. Inc.

FAC(LITY:

S UBJ.ECT:

Indian Point Nuclear Generating :Unit Nos. 2 and S3

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE.CALL LHELD ON APRIL *3,2008,,

BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY.COMI*MI.R1ON AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS, 2 AND 3, LICENSERENEWAL APPLI.CA.TIO0N-METAL FATIGUE, BOLTED CONNECTIONS, AND BORAFLEXý The U.-S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and. repre'sentatiVe6s" of Eintergy Nuclear Operatio'ns,- Inc., held a telephone conference call on April 3, 2008, to discuss and clriy the staff's draft request for additional Information (0;i ocenn h Ida on Nuclear.Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, license renewal application. The telepihoeq"c'onfrec calwsuseful rin clarifyn thq intent of the staff's D-fRAl provides.:a isti ngof the participants and Enclosuire 2 conttalins-a listing of the D-RAI i.1em-s-disct s, wit th; appiat inluding a befdescrpin on th Pttsofteies Theappicnthad ano oportunityito-commentntis s-ummay Kimberly Gre n, SafeyPojc Mange Projects Branch 2 Division of Liceinse Reeal:

Office of'-

ru'lear Reao Regu laton Do6kt Nos'. 50-247 and 50'28 Enclo~sures-1I, List of Participants 2.Summ~ary of Discussion..

'cwencls. See next page

Indianý Point Nuclear Generating Units. 2.and 3 cc:

Senior Vice President Entergy, Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P.'O.Box 31995 Jackson,.MS 39286-1995 Vice President Oversight Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P.O.Box 31995 Jackson,. MS 39286A1995 Senior Manager, Nuclear Safety.&

Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P'O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Senior Vice President and COO Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White, Plains, NY 10601 Manager, Ucensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Paul D. Tonko President and CEO New York State Energy Research and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. John P. Spath New.York StateEnergy, Research.and

.Development Authority 17 'Columbia-Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. PaulEddy New. York State Department of Public Service 3 Empire StatePlaza Albany, NY 12223-1350 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Senior Resident Inspector's Office Indian Point 2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59

.Buchanan, NY 10511 Senior-Resident Inspector's Office Indian Point-3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59 Buchanan, NY 10511 Mr. Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Mr. Raymond L. Albanese Four County Coordinator 200 Bradhurst Avenue Unit 4 Westchester County Hawthorne, NY 10532 Mayor, Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2and 3 cc:

Mr. William DiProfio PWR SRC-Consultant 48 Bear. Hill Road Newton,.NH 03858 Mr. Garry Randolph PWR SRC Consultant 1,750, Ben Franklin Drive, 7E Sarasota,ý FL 34236 Mr. William T. Russell PWR SRC Consultant 400 Plantation Lane Stevensville, MD 21666-3232 Mr. Jim Riccio Greenpeace 702 H Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Mr. Phillip Musegaas Riverkeeper, Inc.

828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 Mr. Mark Jacobs IPSEC 46 Highland Drive Garrison, NY 10524 Mr. R. M. Waters Technical Specialist Licensing 450 Broadway P.O. Box 0249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Sherwood Martinelli 351 Dyckman Peekskill, NY 10566 Ms. Susan Shapiro, Esq.

21 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, NY 10977 John Sipos Assistant-Attorney-General NewYork State. Department of Law Environmental Protection Bureau The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Robert Snook AssistantAttorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O; Box120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Ms. Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Mr. Paul M. Bessette, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Mr. Martin J. O'Neill, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 The Honorable Nita Lowey 222 Mamaroneck Avenue, Suite 310 White Plains, NY 10605 Joan Leary Matthews Senior Counsel for Special Projects Office of General Counsel NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-5500

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS APRIL 3,2008 PARTICIPANTS Kim Green On Yee Peter Wen Jim Davis Bo Pham Jim Medhoff Mike Stroud Garry Young Alan Cox Ted Ivy Don Fronabarger Charlie Caputo John 'Curry Nelson Azevedo Charlie Jackson AFFILIATIONS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

NRC NRC NRC NRC NRC Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)

Entergy Entergy Entergy Entergy Entergy Entergy Entergy Entergy ENCLOSURE I

DRAFT REQUEST FORADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERAT:ING UNIT NOS. 2AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL :APPLICATION t 7METAL; FATIGUE April 3, 2008 The U.S.:Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or, the staff)l and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., held a telephone conferencecall on April 3, 2008, to discuss and clarifylthe following draft requests for additional information (D-RA.s) concerning the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 license renewal application (LRA).

D-RAI 4.3.1.8-1 License, Renewal Application Section 4.3.1 states wCurrent design basis fatigue evaluations calculate cumulative usage factors (CUFs) forcomponents or-sub-components based on design transient cycles." For CU Fvalues listed in LRA Tables 4.3-13 and 4.3-14, please provide theT methodology used with sufficient results of the fatigue analysis such that the staff can make a determination based onithe guidance described inStandard Review Plan-License Renewal (SRP-LR) (NUREG-1 800). Specifically, please describe the details of how environmentally assisted fatigue (EAF) is factored into the calculation of the CUF using Fe values.

Discussion: The applicant was uncertain as to whether the staff was requesting that they provide the evaluations or a description of evaluations. Based on the discussion with the applicant, the staff agreed to revise this question as follows. The revised question will be sent as a formal RAI.

License renewal application (LRA) Section 4.3.1 states "Current design basis fatigue evaluations calculate cumulative usage factors (CUFs) for components or sub-components based on design transient cycles." For CUF values listed in LRA Tables 4.3-13 and 4.3-14, please describe the details of how various environmental effects are factored into the calculation of the CUF using F,,6 values.

D.RAI 4.3.1.8-2 From the review of EAF analysis of other plants, it was found that the transfer function methodology used in the EAF analysis may not provide valid results, as it is dependent on the inputs. To assist the staff in its review, please provide the EAF analysis for all the NUREG/

CR-6260 locations (components) at Indian Point unless it can be demonstrated that the CUF value is within the ASME Code limit of 1.0.by using the original 40-year analysis value adjusted for 60 years and multiplied by Fen, which is consistent with SRP-LR and ASME Code. This analysis should be completed by using NRC-approved fatigue software and the ASME Code,Section III, Subsection NB-3200 methodology (which defines the use of six stress components to determine the stress state and thereby calculates the principal stresses and stress, intensities). Justify the analysis method, the load (stress) combination, and the results of the ASME Code analysis if 2-D axis-symmetric modeling is used. In addition, the analysis should apply ASME code rules such as elastic-plastic correction factor, K, and stress intensities correction factor for modulus of elasticity. This analysis should be performed without the use of the transfer function method.

ENCLOSURE 2 Discussion: The applicant-wanted-clarification on the staff's request. The applicant pointed out thatthe requestis a new staff position and that forprevious plants, the staff hasnot requested the-,analyses.-to.be.provided and, has accepted a:commitmenttoperform 4the analyses two years prior to entering the period of extended operation as Part -6f the6 F atig ue Monitorng Program in accordance with. O CFR 54.21 (c)(1)(iii)..- Subsequent to the telePhone conference, the staff determined that no additional information is needed atthis time. Therefore, a formal RAI will not be issued at this time.

D-RAI 4.3.1.8ý3 SRP-LR Section 4.3.2.1.1.3 provides the basis for the staff acceptance of an aging management program to addessenvironmental-fatigue. lt states, -"[T]hestaff has evaluated-a program for monitoring and tracking the number of critical thermal and, pressure transients for the selected reactor coolant. system:components, Thestaff has determinedthatthis program is an acceptable aging managementeprogram to address metal fatigue of :the reactor coolant system components according to 10 CFR 54.21 (c)(1)(iii).": The staff is unable to determine if the Fatigue Monitoring Program-of lP2 andl1P3 contain-sufficient details to satisfy:this criterion, based on-the NAhitems listed i!n, LRA Tables 4.3-13 and 4.3-14. Please provide adequate details of the Fatigue Monitoring Program,' specifically the fatigue analysis used in determining the CUF values for the NA locations and how IPEC plans to proceed in monitoring the locations of Tables 4.3-13 and 4.3-14 during the period of extended operation.

Discussion: The applicant wanted clarification on what the staff is requesting. Based on the discussion with the -applicant, the staff agreed. to revise this question as follows. The revised question will be sent as a formal RAl, Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (SRP-LR) Section 4.3.2.1.1.3 provides the basisfor the staff acceptance

-of an aging management program to address environmental fatigue. It states, '[t]he staff has evaluated a program for monitoring and tracking the number of critical thermal and pressure transients for the selected reactor coolant system components.

The staff has determined that this program is an acceptable aging managembnt program to address metal fatigue of the reactor coolant system components according to 10 CFR 54.21 (c)(1 )(iii)." The staff is unable to determine if the Fatigue Monitoring Program for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 contains sufficient details to satisfy this criterion. Please provide adequate details of the Fatigue Monitoring Program such that the staff can make a determination based on the criterion set forth in SRP-LR Section 4.3.2.1.1.3. Also, please explain in detail the corrective actions and the frequency that such actions will be taken so that theacceptance criteria will not be exceeded in the period of extended operation. (This RAI will be renumbered as RAI 4.3.1.8-2.)

D-RAI 4.3.1.8-4 Section B. 1.12 of the LRA amendment, dated January 22, 2008, states, "If ongoing monitoring indicates the potential for a condition outside that analyzed above, IPEC may perform further reanalysis of the identified configuration using established configuration management processes as described above." Please explain in detail what is meant by the phrase musing established configuration management processes." Also, please explain in detail the corrective actions and the frequency that such actions will be taken so the acceptance criteria will not be exceeded in the period of extended operation.

Discussion: The applicant stated that it was unclear-aboutlhe staff's request regarding

,configuration management processes." In a subsequent call, the applicant :explained that the

'configuration managementprocesses referred to aret those govemed :byits 10 CFR Part 50, APppendix B,,Q u Quality."Assuranceprogra m, and include design in p ut verification and independent reviews which ensure that valid assumptions, transients, cycles, externaoadingsanalysis methods, and environmental fatigue life correction factors will behusedý inthe fatigue analyses.

Therefore, this portion of question is withdrawn and will not be sent asa formal RAI. The portion of.,the request that deals with corrective actions willhbe added to RAI 4.3.1.8-r2(as renumbered).

Non-EQ Bolted Cable Connection AMP D-RAI 3.0.3.3.6-1 With regard to Indian Point Aging Management Program (AMP),B.1.22, "Non-EQ Bolted'Cable Connection Program," thellicense renewal applicationstates that inspection methods may include thermography, contact resistance testing, or otherappropriate methods including visual, based on plant configuration and industry guidance. In Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL)

AMP XI.E6, the staff recommends thermography,, contact resistance testing, or other appropriate methods based on plant configuration and industry guidance for detecting loss of preload or bolt loosening. In the case where visual inspection will-be the only method used, provide a technical basis of how this will be sufficient to detect loss of preloador loosening of bolted connections.

Discussion: The applicant stated that this question is similar to an audit question that has been answered and subsequently discussed during two telephone conferences. This issue is being reviewed by the Division of Engineering and, therefore, is withdrawn at this time. However, when the staff has: reached a determination, a formal RAI may be issued at such time.

Boraflex AMP D-RAi 3.0.3.2.3-1 Indian Point 2 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 20, dated 2006, Section 14.2.1 on page 55 of 218, states in -part that:

"Northeast Technology Corporation report NET-173-01 and NET-171-02 are based on conservative projections of amount of boraflex absorber panel degradation assumed in each sub-region. These projections are valid through the end of the year 2006."

Please confirm that the Boraflex neutron absorber panels in the Indian Point Unit 2 spent fuel pool have been re-evaluated for service through the end of the current licensing period. Also, please discuss the plans for updating the Boraflex analysis during the period of extended operation.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

.,UNITED,STATES OEAMERICAK NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY LICENSINGBOARD x

In re:

LicenseRenewal Application Submitted by Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR

-ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD01 DPR-26, DPR-64

-x CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 Teresa Fountain hereby declares:

I am over 18 years old and am an employee in the New York State Office of the Attorney General.

I hereby certify that on May 22, 2008, copies of "The State of New York's Supplemental Citation In Support of Contention 26A" were served upon the following persons via electronic mail and by deposit in the U.S. Postal Service with first class postage:

LawrenceG. McDade, Chair Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mailstop 3 F23 Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Lawrence.McDade@nrc.gov Richard E. Wardwell Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mailstop 3 F23 Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 190 Cedar Lane E.

Ridgway, CO 81432 Kaye.Lathrop@nrc.gov Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mailstop 3 F23 Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Zachary S. Kahn, Esq.

Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mailstop 3 F23 Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Zachary.Kahn@nrc.gov Marcia Carpentier Law'Cleik-Atomic Safety andLicensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear.Regulatory Commission Mailstop 3 E2B Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike.

Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Marcia.Carpentier@nrc.gov Office of Commission Appellate. Adjudication, U.S. NNuclear Regulatory Commission Mailstop 16 G4 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738

.ocaamail@nrc.gov Office of the Secretary Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mailstop 3F23 Two White'Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 hearingdocket@nrc.gov Sherwin E..Turk, Esq.

David E. Roth, Esq.

Marcia J. Simon, Esq.

Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.

Jessica A. Bielecki, Esq.

Officeof the General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mailstop 15 D21 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike

'Rockville, MD 20852-2738 set@nrc.gov der@nrc.gov jessica.bielecki@nrc.gov bnml@nrc.gov marcia.simon@nrc.gov Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Paul M. Bessette, Esq.

Martin J. O'Neill, Esq.'

Mauri T. Lemoncelli, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 ksutton@morganlewis.com pbessette@morganlewis.com martin.o'neill@morganlewis.com mlemoncelli@morganlewis.com cadams@morganlewis.com Elise N. Zoli, E~sq.

zGoodvvnPr,octer, LL IP Exchange Place 53.State Street Boston, MA 02109 ezoli@goodwinprocter~com William C. Dennis, Esq.

Assistant General Counsel

• Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton7Avenue White'Plains, NY 10601 wdennis@entergy.com Robert D.. Snook!,Esq.

Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55'Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 robert.snook@po.state.ct.us Justin D. Pruyne, Esq.

Assistant County Attorney Office of the Westchester County Attorney Michaelian :Office Building 148 Martine Avenue, 6th.Floor White Plains, NY 10601 jdp3@westchestergov.com Daniel E. O'Neill,, Mayor James Seirmarco, M.S.

Village of Buchanan Municipal Building 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 vob@bestweb.net Daniel Riesel, Esq.

Thomas F. Wood, Esq.

Jessica Steinberg, J.D.

Sive, Paget &Riesel, P.C.

460 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 driesel@sprlaw.com jsteinberg@sprlaw.com Michael J. Delaney, Esq.

Vice President - Energy Department New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC) 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 mdelaney@nycedc.com

(

Arthur J. Kremer, Chairman.

• New York~Afifoidable: Relabl'eElectric'ity Allianric'e

,(AREA) 347 Fifth.Avenue, Suite 508 New York, NY 10016

ýkremer@area-alliance.org ajkremef@rnfpc.com Manna Jo Greene, Director Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.

'112 Little Market'.St.

Poughkeepsie; NY.-.12601 Mannajo@clearwater.org Stephen Filler, Esq.

Board Member' Hudson River. Sloop Clearwater, Inc.

-Suite 222 303 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY. 10591 sfiller@nylawline.com Susan H. Shapiro,. Esq.

Weschester Citizen's Awareness Network (WestCan), Citizens Awareness Network (CAN),etc.

21 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, NY 10977 mbs@ourrocklandoffice.com, NancyBurton 147 Cross Highway Redding Ridge, CT 06876 NancyBurtonCT@aol.com

-Richard L-.Brodsky,gEsq.

Assehib yman, SuiteW205 5 West Main Street Elmsford,,NY.10523

,brtdskr@assembly.state*.ny.us

-richardbrodsky@msnicom Sarah L. Wagner, Esq.

Room 422 Legislative Office:Building

• Albany, NY.'12248 sarahwagneresq@gmail.com John LeKay FUSE USA 35.1 DyckmanStreet Peekskill',NY 10566 fuse usa@yahoo.com Diane Curran, Esq.

Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP Suite 600 1726 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 dcurran@harmoncurran.com Phillip Musegaas, Esq.

Victor Tafur, Esq.

Riverkeeper, Inc.

828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 phillip@riverkeeper.org vtafur@riverkeeper.org I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on:

this 22nd day of May 2008 Albany, New York

/I Teresa Fountain