ML18155A191: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
| project = | | project = EPID:L-2018-LLA-0110 | ||
| stage = Acceptance Review | | stage = Acceptance Review | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: | ||
Cc: | Galvin, Dennis Sent: | ||
Friday, June 1, 2018 4:43 PM To: | |||
Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com) | |||
Cc: | |||
Mark Turkal (Mark.Turkal@duke-energy.com) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
==Dear Mr. Grzeck,== | ==Dear Mr. Grzeck,== | ||
By {{letter dated|date=April 25, 2018|text=letter dated April 25, 2018}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18121A366), Duke Energy Progress, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed amendments would revise an existing note for Technical Specification 3.8.3, Diesel Fuel Oil, to allow, on a one-time basis, the main fuel oil storage tank to be inoperable for up to 14 days for the purpose of performing required inspection, cleaning, and any necessary repair activities. | |||
By letter dated April 25, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18121A366), Duke Energy Progress, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed amendments would revise an existing note for Technical Specification 3.8.3, Diesel Fuel Oil, to allow, on a one-time basis, the main fuel oil storage tank to be inoperable for up to 14 days for the purpose of performing required inspection, cleaning, and any necessary repair activities. | |||
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 250 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 11 months, which is May 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6256. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6256. | ||
Respectfully, Dennis Galvin, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-325, 50-324 | 2 Respectfully, Dennis Galvin, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-325, 50-324 | ||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: | ||
NRR_DMPS Email Number: | |||
399 Mail Envelope Properties (Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov20180601164200) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Of Requested Licensing Action Re: Amendment Request Proposing One-Time Extension of Main Fuel Oil Storage Tank Completion Time (L-2018-LLA-0110) | Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Of Requested Licensing Action Re: Amendment Request Proposing One-Time Extension of Main Fuel Oil Storage Tank Completion Time (L-2018-LLA-0110) | ||
Sent Date: | Sent Date: | ||
6/1/2018 4:42:52 PM Received Date: | |||
6/1/2018 4:42:00 PM From: | |||
Galvin, Dennis Created By: | |||
Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
"Mark Turkal (Mark.Turkal@duke-energy.com)" <Mark.Turkal@duke-energy.com> | "Mark Turkal (Mark.Turkal@duke-energy.com)" <Mark.Turkal@duke-energy.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com)" <Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com> | Tracking Status: None "Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com)" <Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
Files | Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3643 6/1/2018 4:42:00 PM Options Priority: | ||
Standard Return Notification: | |||
No Reply Requested: | |||
No Sensitivity: | |||
Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | Recipients Received:}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:37, 5 January 2025
| ML18155A191 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 06/01/2018 |
| From: | Dennis Galvin Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Grzeck L Duke Energy Carolinas |
| References | |
| L-2018-LLA-0110 | |
| Download: ML18155A191 (3) | |
Text
1 NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From:
Galvin, Dennis Sent:
Friday, June 1, 2018 4:43 PM To:
Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com)
Cc:
Mark Turkal (Mark.Turkal@duke-energy.com)
Subject:
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Of Requested Licensing Action Re: Amendment Request Proposing One-Time Extension of Main Fuel Oil Storage Tank Completion Time (L-2018-LLA-0110)
Dear Mr. Grzeck,
By letter dated April 25, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18121A366), Duke Energy Progress, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The proposed amendments would revise an existing note for Technical Specification 3.8.3, Diesel Fuel Oil, to allow, on a one-time basis, the main fuel oil storage tank to be inoperable for up to 14 days for the purpose of performing required inspection, cleaning, and any necessary repair activities.
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 11 months, which is May 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6256.
2 Respectfully, Dennis Galvin, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-325, 50-324
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_DMPS Email Number:
399 Mail Envelope Properties (Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov20180601164200)
Subject:
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance Of Requested Licensing Action Re: Amendment Request Proposing One-Time Extension of Main Fuel Oil Storage Tank Completion Time (L-2018-LLA-0110)
Sent Date:
6/1/2018 4:42:52 PM Received Date:
6/1/2018 4:42:00 PM From:
Galvin, Dennis Created By:
Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Mark Turkal (Mark.Turkal@duke-energy.com)" <Mark.Turkal@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com)" <Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3643 6/1/2018 4:42:00 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: