ML19282B980: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML19282B980 | | number = ML19282B980 | ||
| issue date = 03/14/1979 | | issue date = 03/14/1979 | ||
| title = Responds to | | title = Responds to Requesting Comments on Draft Suppl to Fes (NUREG-0530).Notes Omission on Page 1 & Suggests Inclusion of Plan & Location Map of Selected Site | ||
| author name = Heinemann J | | author name = Heinemann J | ||
| author affiliation = FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION | | author affiliation = FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 7903190200 | | document report number = NUDOCS 7903190200 | ||
| title reference date = 02-28-1979 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, OTHER U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY/DEPARTMENT TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, OTHER U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY/DEPARTMENT TO NRC | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WAS H INGTON, D.C. 20426 IN REPLY REFER TO: | {{#Wiki_filter:FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WAS H INGTON, D.C. | ||
20426 IN REPLY REFER TO: | |||
March 14, 1979 Mr. William H. Regan Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis Nuclear Regulatory Coninissior Washington, D. C. 20555 | March 14, 1979 Mr. William H. Regan Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis Nuclear Regulatory Coninissior Washington, D. C. 20555 | ||
==Dear Mr. Regan:== | ==Dear Mr. Regan:== | ||
I am replying to your request of February 28, 1979 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for conments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2. | |||
I am replying to your request of February 28, 1979 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for conments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2. This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based. | This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based. | ||
The staff concentrates its review of other agencies' environmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts involved with the proposed action. It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken. | The staff concentrates its review of other agencies' environmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts involved with the proposed action. | ||
Please note that on page 1 of the DEIS, the unit (Fahrenheit or Centigrade) of the cooling water to be raised by 12 degrees after passing through the condenser was not given. | It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken. | ||
Please note that on page 1 of the DEIS, the unit (Fahrenheit or Centigrade) of the cooling water to be raised by 12 degrees after passing through the condenser was not given. | |||
Also, it is desirable to include a plan and location map of the selected site (Rock Point or Pilgrim) in the DEIS. | |||
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement. | Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement. | ||
Sincerely, (s | Sincerely, (s | ||
l n.ttjitw h e ' | |||
/dack$.Heinemann | |||
7903190200 | %dvisor on Environmental Quality b | ||
7903190200 L | |||
D}} | |||
Latest revision as of 22:45, 2 January 2025
| ML19282B980 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000471 |
| Issue date: | 03/14/1979 |
| From: | Heinemann J FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| To: | Regan W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7903190200 | |
| Download: ML19282B980 (1) | |
Text
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WAS H INGTON, D.C.
20426 IN REPLY REFER TO:
March 14, 1979 Mr. William H. Regan Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis Nuclear Regulatory Coninissior Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Regan:
I am replying to your request of February 28, 1979 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for conments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2.
This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.
The staff concentrates its review of other agencies' environmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts involved with the proposed action.
It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.
Please note that on page 1 of the DEIS, the unit (Fahrenheit or Centigrade) of the cooling water to be raised by 12 degrees after passing through the condenser was not given.
Also, it is desirable to include a plan and location map of the selected site (Rock Point or Pilgrim) in the DEIS.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.
Sincerely, (s
l n.ttjitw h e '
/dack$.Heinemann
%dvisor on Environmental Quality b
7903190200 L
D