ML052220387: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:MonticelloElS - The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05. Page 1 From:             "Susan Backes" <Susan.Backes~co.wright.mn.us>
{{#Wiki_filter:MonticelloElS - The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05. Page 1 From:  
To:               <MonticelloEIS@nrc.gov>
"Susan Backes" <Susan.Backes~co.wright.mn.us>
Date:             Mon, Aug 1, 2005 4:46 PM
To:  
<MonticelloEIS@nrc.gov>
Date:
Mon, Aug 1, 2005 4:46 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 24: Line 27:
mailed on 8-01-05.
mailed on 8-01-05.
The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05.
The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05.
E~3 m:            c Con DT          C-,
m:
                                                                                                                  - I D -
D T
7-fl        GI, C:)
7-fl 22-I fl E~3 c
C-,
GI, I
Con I D C:)
CC C-)
CC C-)
22-          I            5 rn Ifl                        PCI
rn 5
                                                                                                                    -3
PCI
            /  ( //,"
/
Ad Ae- S. &cS
( //,"
                                                                                                    ,Ce      a
AC z'/
                        . AC      z'/                                                        zC;,   roV             )
-3
,Ce Ad S.
Ae- &cS a
zC;,
roV  
)


MonticelloEIS 01-05 to Nuclear Regulatory Commission re power plant                                                     Page 1 August 1, 2005 Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administration Services Office of Administration Mailstop T-6D59 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-000 1 Attn: Federal Registrar June 2, 2005 Pg. 32381-32382
MonticelloEIS 01-05 to Nuclear Regulatory Commission re power plant Page 1 August 1, 2005 Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administration Services Office of Administration Mailstop T-6D59 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-000 1 Attn: Federal Registrar June 2, 2005 Pg. 32381-32382


==Dear Sir or Madam:==
==Dear Sir or Madam:==
This letter is in response to your request for public comment on the re-licensure of the Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello, Minnesota.
This letter is in response to your request for public comment on the re-licensure of the Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello, Minnesota.
Let me begin by indicating my support for the re-licensure and briefly mention some of the benefits of the Facility as I have observed them over the years. Obviously there is a huge need for electricity in the Minnesota Region that could be difficult to replace with the loss of this facility. Beyond this fact, there are many local benefits to the Nuclear Plant in Monticello. It plays an important role in the local economy, both as an employer and taxpayer to local families and governments. The company and its employees have demonstrated their support to the community through donations and volunteer efforts to various local groups, organizations and charities. The plant is reliable, efficient, and most importantly managed in a manner to uphold the highest standards of safety. As a Public Information Official (PIO) of the Wright County Nuclear Emergency Response Team, I know first hand the efforts in place to assure safety at the plant under the unlikely scenario of a system malfunction.
Let me begin by indicating my support for the re-licensure and briefly mention some of the benefits of the Facility as I have observed them over the years. Obviously there is a huge need for electricity in the Minnesota Region that could be difficult to replace with the loss of this facility. Beyond this fact, there are many local benefits to the Nuclear Plant in Monticello.
It plays an important role in the local economy, both as an employer and taxpayer to local families and governments. The company and its employees have demonstrated their support to the community through donations and volunteer efforts to various local groups, organizations and charities. The plant is reliable, efficient, and most importantly managed in a manner to uphold the highest standards of safety. As a Public Information Official (PIO) of the Wright County Nuclear Emergency Response Team, I know first hand the efforts in place to assure safety at the plant under the unlikely scenario of a system malfunction.
As a member of the Wright County Board of Commissioners that represents the area in which the plant exists, please let me extend my support to NMC in their efforts to re-license the Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello, Minnesota.
As a member of the Wright County Board of Commissioners that represents the area in which the plant exists, please let me extend my support to NMC in their efforts to re-license the Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello, Minnesota.
Sincerely, Pat Sawatzke Commissioner-District 2
Sincerely, Pat Sawatzke Commissioner-District 2


                                -
I c:\\temp\\GW}00001.TMP Page 1'l Mail Envelope Properties (42EE8A2B.011: 0:17)
I c:\temp\GW}00001.TMP                                                                                 Page 1'l Mail Envelope Properties     (42EE8A2B.011: 0:17)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05.
The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05.
Creation Date:          Mon, Aug 1, 2005 4:45 PM From:                  "Susan Backes" <Susan.Backes~co.wright.mn.us>
Mon, Aug 1, 2005 4:45 PM "Susan Backes" <Susan.Backes~co.wright.mn.us>
Created By:            Susan.Backesgcov.wright.mn.us Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFN DO MonticelloEIS Post Office                                         Route owf4_po.OWFNDO                                     nrc.gov Files                           Size                 Date & Time MESSAGE                         103                 Monday, August 1, 2005 4:45 PM 08-01-05 to Nuclear Regulatory Commission re power plant               4212 Mime.822                       7221 Options Expiration Date:               None Priority:                       Standard Reply Requested:               No Return Notification:           None Concealed  
Susan.Backesgcov.wright.mn.us Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFN DO MonticelloEIS Post Office owf4_po.OWFNDO Route nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 103 Monday, August 1, 2005 4:45 PM 08-01-05 to Nuclear Regulatory Commission re power plant 4212 Mime.822 7221 Options Expiration Date:
None Priority:
Standard Reply Requested:
No Return Notification:
None Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:                       Standard}}
No Security:
Standard}}

Latest revision as of 16:17, 15 January 2025

Comment (14) of Pat Sawatzke for Re-Licensing of Monticello Nuclear Power Plant
ML052220387
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/01/2005
From: Backes S
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/ADM/DAS/RDB
References
70FR32381 00014
Download: ML052220387 (3)


Text

MonticelloElS - The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05. Page 1 From:

"Susan Backes" <Susan.Backes~co.wright.mn.us>

To:

<MonticelloEIS@nrc.gov>

Date:

Mon, Aug 1, 2005 4:46 PM

Subject:

The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was.

mailed on 8-01-05.

The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05.

m:

D T

7-fl 22-I fl E~3 c

C-,

GI, I

Con I D C:)

CC C-)

rn 5

PCI

/

( //,"

AC z'/

-3

,Ce Ad S.

Ae- &cS a

zC;,

roV

)

MonticelloEIS 01-05 to Nuclear Regulatory Commission re power plant Page 1 August 1, 2005 Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administration Services Office of Administration Mailstop T-6D59 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-000 1 Attn: Federal Registrar June 2, 2005 Pg. 32381-32382

Dear Sir or Madam:

This letter is in response to your request for public comment on the re-licensure of the Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello, Minnesota.

Let me begin by indicating my support for the re-licensure and briefly mention some of the benefits of the Facility as I have observed them over the years. Obviously there is a huge need for electricity in the Minnesota Region that could be difficult to replace with the loss of this facility. Beyond this fact, there are many local benefits to the Nuclear Plant in Monticello.

It plays an important role in the local economy, both as an employer and taxpayer to local families and governments. The company and its employees have demonstrated their support to the community through donations and volunteer efforts to various local groups, organizations and charities. The plant is reliable, efficient, and most importantly managed in a manner to uphold the highest standards of safety. As a Public Information Official (PIO) of the Wright County Nuclear Emergency Response Team, I know first hand the efforts in place to assure safety at the plant under the unlikely scenario of a system malfunction.

As a member of the Wright County Board of Commissioners that represents the area in which the plant exists, please let me extend my support to NMC in their efforts to re-license the Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello, Minnesota.

Sincerely, Pat Sawatzke Commissioner-District 2

I c:\\temp\\GW}00001.TMP Page 1'l Mail Envelope Properties (42EE8A2B.011: 0:17)

Subject:

Creation Date:

From:

Created By:

The attached letter is from Commissioner Pat Sawatzke. The original document was mailed on 8-01-05.

Mon, Aug 1, 2005 4:45 PM "Susan Backes" <Susan.Backes~co.wright.mn.us>

Susan.Backesgcov.wright.mn.us Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFN DO MonticelloEIS Post Office owf4_po.OWFNDO Route nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 103 Monday, August 1, 2005 4:45 PM 08-01-05 to Nuclear Regulatory Commission re power plant 4212 Mime.822 7221 Options Expiration Date:

None Priority:

Standard Reply Requested:

No Return Notification:

None Concealed

Subject:

No Security:

Standard