IR 05000397/2009302: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:November 4, 2009 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ | /RA/ | ||
Energy Northwest | Stephen M. Garchow, Acting Chief Operations Branch | ||
Division of Reactor Safety UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R E GI ON I V 612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125 | |||
Energy Northwest | |||
- 2 - | |||
Docket: 50-397 License: NPF-21 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
NRC Examination Report 05000397/2009302 | NRC Examination Report 05000397/2009302 | ||
REGION IV== | REGION IV== | ||
Docket: 50-397 License: NPF-21 Report: 05000397/2009302 Licensee: Energy Northwest Facility: Columbia Generating Station Location: Richland, Washington Dates: October 5, 2009 Inspectors: S. Garchow, Senior Operations Engineer R. DeVercelly, Senior Training Instructor S. Hedger, Operations Engineer Approved By: Stephen M. Garchow, Acting Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety | Docket: | ||
50-397 License: | |||
NPF-21 Report: | |||
05000397/2009302 Licensee: | |||
Energy Northwest Facility: | |||
Columbia Generating Station Location: | |||
Richland, Washington Dates: | |||
October 5, 2009 Inspectors: | |||
S. Garchow, Senior Operations Engineer R. DeVercelly, Senior Training Instructor S. Hedger, Operations Engineer Approved By: | |||
Stephen M. Garchow, Acting Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Enclosure | |||
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | =SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | ||
ER05000397/2009302; October 5, 2009; Columbia Generating Station; Initial Operator | ER05000397/2009302; October 5, 2009; Columbia Generating Station; Initial Operator | ||
Licensing Examination Report. | Licensing Examination Report. | ||
| Line 56: | Line 72: | ||
===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings=== | ===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings=== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
===Licensee-Identified Violations=== | ===Licensee-Identified Violations=== | ||
None. | None. | ||
| Line 67: | Line 81: | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)== | ||
{{a|4OA5}} | {{a|4OA5}} | ||
==4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)== | ==4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)== | ||
===.1 License Applications=== | ===.1 License Applications=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The examiners also audited three of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes. | NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The examiners also audited three of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes. | ||
| Line 78: | Line 91: | ||
===.2 Examination Development=== | ===.2 Examination Development=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
NRC examiners reviewed integrated examination outlines and draft examinations submitted by the licensee against the requirements of NUREG-1021. The NRC examination team conducted an onsite validation of the operating tests. | NRC examiners reviewed integrated examination outlines and draft examinations submitted by the licensee against the requirements of NUREG-1021. The NRC examination team conducted an onsite validation of the operating tests. | ||
| Line 88: | Line 100: | ||
===.3 Operator Knowledge and Performance=== | ===.3 Operator Knowledge and Performance=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
On October 2, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all eight applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on October 14, 2009. | On October 2, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all eight applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on October 14, 2009. | ||
| Line 104: | Line 115: | ||
===.4 Simulation Facility Performance=== | ===.4 Simulation Facility Performance=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during | The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during examination validation and administration. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 112: | Line 122: | ||
===.5 Examination Security=== | ===.5 Examination Security=== | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
The NRC examiners reviewed examination security during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel. | The NRC examiners reviewed examination security during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel. | ||
| Line 118: | Line 127: | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings of significance were identified. | No findings of significance were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | {{a|4OA6}} | ||
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ||
The Chief Examiner presented the preliminary examination results to yourself and other members of the staff on October 8, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on October 20, 2009, between Messrs. Stephen Garchow, Chief Examiner, and Paul Taylor. | The Chief Examiner presented the preliminary examination results to yourself and other members of the staff on October 8, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on October 20, 2009, between Messrs. Stephen Garchow, Chief Examiner, and Paul Taylor. | ||
| Line 130: | Line 140: | ||
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | ==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | ||
===Licensee Personnel=== | |||
: [[contact::R. Hayden]], Exam Developer | |||
===NRC Personnel=== | ===NRC Personnel=== | ||
: [[contact::R. Cohen]], Senior Resident Inspector | : [[contact::R. Cohen]], Senior Resident Inspector | ||
==ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED== | ==ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED== | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:27, 14 January 2025
| ML093080566 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia |
| Issue date: | 11/04/2009 |
| From: | Garchow S Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Parrish J Energy Northwest |
| References | |
| ER-09-302 | |
| Download: ML093080566 (9) | |
Text
November 4, 2009
SUBJECT:
COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000397/2009302
Dear Mr. Parrish:
On October 8, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an initial operator license examination at Columbia Generating Station. The enclosed report documents the examination findings and licensing decisions. The preliminary examination findings were discussed on October 8, 2009, with yourself and other members of your staff. A telephonic exit meeting was conducted on October 20, 2009, with Mr. Paul Taylor, who was provided the NRC licensing decisions.
The examination included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses and six applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses. The license examiners determined that all of the applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued. There were no post-examination comments submitted by your staff. The enclosure to this letter contains the details of this report.
No findings of significance were identified during this examination.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stephen M. Garchow, Acting Chief Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R E GI ON I V 612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125
Energy Northwest
- 2 -
Docket: 50-397 License: NPF-21
Enclosure:
NRC Examination Report 05000397/2009302
REGION IV==
Docket:
50-397 License:
NPF-21 Report:
05000397/2009302 Licensee:
Energy Northwest Facility:
Columbia Generating Station Location:
Richland, Washington Dates:
October 5, 2009 Inspectors:
S. Garchow, Senior Operations Engineer R. DeVercelly, Senior Training Instructor S. Hedger, Operations Engineer Approved By:
Stephen M. Garchow, Acting Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosure
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
ER05000397/2009302; October 5, 2009; Columbia Generating Station; Initial Operator
Licensing Examination Report.
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of two applicants for reactor operator licenses and six applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses at Columbia Generating Station.
The licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The written examination was administered by the licensee on October 2, 2009. NRC examiners administered the operating tests on October 5-9, 2009.
The examiners determined that all of the applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.
NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
Licensee-Identified Violations
None.
REPORT DETAILS
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
.1 License Applications
a. Scope
NRC examiners reviewed all license applications submitted to ensure each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The examiners also audited three of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicants qualifications. This audit focused on the applicants experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
.2 Examination Development
a. Scope
NRC examiners reviewed integrated examination outlines and draft examinations submitted by the licensee against the requirements of NUREG-1021. The NRC examination team conducted an onsite validation of the operating tests.
b. Findings
NRC examiners provided outline, draft examination and post-validation comments to the licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution prior to examination administration.
NRC examiners determined that the written examinations and operating tests initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
.3 Operator Knowledge and Performance
a. Scope
On October 2, 2009, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all eight applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on October 14, 2009.
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating tests to all eight applicants on October 5-9, 2009.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
All of the applicants passed the written examination and all parts of the operating test.
The final written examinations and post-examination analysis may be accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in the attachment. There were no post-examination comments as indicated in the licensee submittal.
The examination team noted generic weaknesses in the areas of tagging plant components and use of computers by the Control Room Supervisors.
.4 Simulation Facility Performance
a. Scope
The NRC examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during examination validation and administration.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
.5 Examination Security
a. Scope
The NRC examiners reviewed examination security during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with 10 CFR 55.49 and NUREG-1021. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.
b. Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
The Chief Examiner presented the preliminary examination results to yourself and other members of the staff on October 8, 2009. A telephonic exit was conducted on October 20, 2009, between Messrs. Stephen Garchow, Chief Examiner, and Paul Taylor.
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- R. Hayden, Exam Developer
NRC Personnel
- R. Cohen, Senior Resident Inspector