ML12290A250: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: | ||
Sreenivas, V Sent: | |||
Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:53 AM To: | |||
'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc: | |||
Tom Shaub; Cotton, Karen; Pascarelli, Robert; Gary D Miller; Johnson, Don | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions By letter dated September 27, 2012, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted a license amendment request for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions for North Anna and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions By {{letter dated|date=September 27, 2012|text=letter dated September 27, 2012}}, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted a license amendment request for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions for North Anna and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2597. | If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2597. | ||
V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M., | V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M., | ||
Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: | ||
NRR_PMDA Email Number: | |||
507 Mail Envelope Properties (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20121016105200) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions Sent Date: | NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions Sent Date: | ||
10/16/2012 10:52:42 AM Received Date: | |||
10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM From: | |||
Sreenivas, V Created By: | |||
V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
"Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com> | "Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Cotton, Karen" <Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov> | Tracking Status: None "Cotton, Karen" <Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 45: | ||
Tracking Status: None "Gary D Miller" <gary.d.miller@dom.com> | Tracking Status: None "Gary D Miller" <gary.d.miller@dom.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Johnson, Don" <Don.Johnson@nrc.gov> | Tracking Status: None "Johnson, Don" <Don.Johnson@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None | ||
"'david.heacock@dom.com'" <david.heacock@dom.com> | "'david.heacock@dom.com'" <david.heacock@dom.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
Files | Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1774 10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM Options Priority: | ||
Standard Return Notification: | |||
No Reply Requested: | |||
No Sensitivity: | |||
Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | Recipients Received:}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:00, 11 January 2025
| ML12290A250 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry, North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 10/16/2012 |
| From: | V Sreenivas Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Heacock D Dominion Generation |
| References | |
| Download: ML12290A250 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Sreenivas, V Sent:
Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:53 AM To:
'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc:
Tom Shaub; Cotton, Karen; Pascarelli, Robert; Gary D Miller; Johnson, Don
Subject:
NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions By letter dated September 27, 2012, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted a license amendment request for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions for North Anna and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2597.
V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,
Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
507 Mail Envelope Properties (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20121016105200)
Subject:
NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions Sent Date:
10/16/2012 10:52:42 AM Received Date:
10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM From:
Sreenivas, V Created By:
V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None "Cotton, Karen" <Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Pascarelli, Robert" <Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Gary D Miller" <gary.d.miller@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None "Johnson, Don" <Don.Johnson@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
"'david.heacock@dom.com'" <david.heacock@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1774 10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: