ML070440147: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee 37384-2000 January 31,                 2007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:                   Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:
{{#Wiki_filter:Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee 37384-2000 January 31, 2007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:
In the Matter of                                                 )               Docket No. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) - UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR) REVISION 1 In accordance with the SQN Unit 1 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.14.c, enclosed is the revised Unit 1 Cycle 15 COLR.
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
The COLR was revised to incorporate changes in the heat flux hot channel factor, elevation dependant adjustment factor, and the axial flux difference limits.                                     These revised factors were necessary to improve operating margins for SQN Unit 1.
20555 Gentlemen:
Please direct questions concerning this issue to me at                                       (423) 843-7170.
In the Matter of  
)
Docket No.
50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN)
UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)
REVISION 1 In accordance with the SQN Unit 1 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.14.c, enclosed is the revised Unit 1 Cycle 15 COLR.
The COLR was revised to incorporate changes in the heat flux hot channel factor, elevation dependant adjustment factor, and the axial flux difference limits.
These revised factors were necessary to improve operating margins for SQN Unit 1.
Please direct questions concerning this issue to me at (423) 843-7170.
Sincerely, Glenn W. Morris Manager, Site Licensing and Industry Affairs Enclosure A4o/
Sincerely, Glenn W. Morris Manager, Site Licensing and Industry Affairs Enclosure A4o/
Printed on recycled paper
Printed on recycled paper


U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 January 31, 2007 cc (Enclosure):
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 January 31, 2007 cc (Enclosure):
Mr. Brendan T. Moroney, Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear.Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08G-9a One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2739
Mr.
Brendan T.
: Moroney, Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear.Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08G-9a One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2739


SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT
SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT
                                              'REVISION 1 January 2007 Prepared by:
'REVISION 1 January 2007 Prepared by:
Original Signed byT. D. Beu                                   / January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering                                                   Date Verified by:
Original Signed byT. D. Beu  
Original Signed by B. S. Catalanotto                           / January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering                                                   Date Reviewed by:
/ January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering Date Verified by:
Original Signed by C. S. Faulkner                             / January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering Manager                                           Date Original Signed by C. A. Griffin                               / January 19, 2007 Reactor Engineering Supervisor                                         Date Approved by:
Original Signed by B. S. Catalanotto  
Original Signed by M. H. Palmer                               / January 23, 2007 PORC Chairman                                                           Date Original Signed by D. A. Kulisek                               / January 24, 2007 Plant Manager                                                           Date Revision     1 Pages affected   1. 3.4, 12-14 Reason for Revision To incorporate changes in the FQ limit, K(Z) curve, and AFD limits due to a revised Large Break LOCA analysis to improve operatinq margins SEQUOYAH - UNIT I                               Page 1 of 14 Revision I
/ January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering Date Reviewed by:
Original Signed by C. S. Faulkner  
/ January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering Manager Date Original Signed by C. A. Griffin  
/ January 19, 2007 Reactor Engineering Supervisor Date Approved by:
Original Signed by M. H. Palmer  
/ January 23, 2007 PORC Chairman Date Original Signed by D. A. Kulisek  
/ January 24, 2007 Plant Manager Date Revision 1
Pages affected 1. 3.4, 12-14 Reason for Revision To incorporate changes in the FQ limit, K(Z) curve, and AFD limits due to a revised Large Break LOCA analysis to improve operatinq margins SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Revision I Page 1 of 14


SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Sequoyah Unit 1 Cycle 15 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification (TS) 6.9.1.14.
SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Sequoyah Unit 1 Cycle 15 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification (TS) 6.9.1.14.
The TSs affected by this report are listed below:
The TSs affected by this report are listed below:
TABLE 2.2-1         f1(AI) trip reset function for OTAT Trip (QTNL, QTPL) and rates of trip setpoint decrease per percent Al (QTNS, QTPS)
TABLE 2.2-1 f1(AI) trip reset function for OTAT Trip (QTNL, QTPL) and rates of trip setpoint decrease per percent Al (QTNS, QTPS)
TABLE 2.2-1         f2(AI) trip reset function for OPAT Trip (QPNL, QPPL) and rates of trip setpoint decrease per percent Al (QPNS, QPPS) 3/4.1.1.3             Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) 3/4.1.3.5           Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit 3/4.1.3.6           Control Rod Insertion Limits 3/4.2.1             Axial Flux Difference (AFD) 3/4.2.2             Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor (FQ(X,Y,Z))
TABLE 2.2-1 f2(AI) trip reset function for OPAT Trip (QPNL, QPPL) and rates of trip setpoint decrease per percent Al (QPNS, QPPS) 3/4.1.1.3 Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) 3/4.1.3.5 Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit 3/4.1.3.6 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3/4.2.1 Axial Flux Difference (AFD) 3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor (FQ(X,Y,Z))
3/4.2.3             Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor   (FAH(X,Y))
3/4.2.3 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor (FAH(X,Y))
2.0   OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in section 1.0 are presented in the following subsections. These limits have been developed using the NRC approved methodologies specified in TS 6.9.1.14. The versions of the topical reports which describe the methodologies used for this cycle are listed in Table 1.
2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in section 1.0 are presented in the following subsections. These limits have been developed using the NRC approved methodologies specified in TS 6.9.1.14. The versions of the topical reports which describe the methodologies used for this cycle are listed in Table 1.
The following abbreviations are used in this section:
The following abbreviations are used in this section:
BOL stands for Beginning of Cycle Life ARO stands for All Rods Out HZP stands for Hot Zero THERMAL POWER EOL stands for End of Cycle Life RTP stands for RATED THERMAL POWER 2.1   Moderator Temperature Coefficient - MTC (Specification 3/4.1.1.3) 2.1.1     The MTC limits are:
BOL stands for Beginning of Cycle Life ARO stands for All Rods Out HZP stands for Hot Zero THERMAL POWER EOL stands for End of Cycle Life RTP stands for RATED THERMAL POWER 2.1 Moderator Temperature Coefficient - MTC (Specification 3/4.1.1.3) 2.1.1 The MTC limits are:
The BOL/ARO/HZP MTC shall be less positive than 0 Ak/k/°F (BOL limit). With the measured BOL/ARO/HZP MTC more positive than -0.16 x 10- 5 Ak/k/°F (as-measured MTC limit), establish control rod withdrawal limits to ensure the MTC remains less positive than 0 Ak/k/°F for all times in core life.
The BOL/ARO/HZP MTC shall be less positive than 0 Ak/k/°F (BOL limit). With the measured BOL/ARO/HZP MTC more positive than -0.16 x 10-5 Ak/k/°F (as-measured MTC limit), establish control rod withdrawal limits to ensure the MTC remains less positive than 0 Ak/k/°F for all times in core life.
The EOL/ARO/RTP MTC shall be less negative than or equal to -4.5 x 10-4 Ak/k/ 0 F.
The EOL/ARO/RTP MTC shall be less negative than or equal to -4.5 x 10-4 Ak/k/0F.
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1                                     Page 2 of 14                                   Revision 1
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 Page 2 of 14 Revision 1


SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 2.1.2   The 300 ppm surveillance limit is:
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 2.1.2 The 300 ppm surveillance limit is:
The measured 300 ppm/ARO/RTP MTC should be less negative than or equal to
The measured 300 ppm/ARO/RTP MTC should be less negative than or equal to
            -3.75 x 10 -4 Ak/k/°F.
-3.75 x 10 -4 Ak/k/°F.
2.2 Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit (Specification 314.1.3.5) 2.2.1   The shutdown rods shall be withdrawn to a position as defined below:
2.2 Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit (Specification 314.1.3.5) 2.2.1 The shutdown rods shall be withdrawn to a position as defined below:
Cycle Burnup (MWD/MTU)                     Steps Withdrawn
Cycle Burnup (MWD/MTU)
                                >0                               > 225 to < 231 2.3 Control Rod Insertion Limits (Specification 3/4.1.3.6) 2.3.1   The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown in Figure 1.
Steps Withdrawn
2.4 Axial Flux Difference - AFD (Specification 3/4.2.1) 2.4.1   The axial flux difference (AFD) limits (AFDLrmnt) are provided in Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C.
> 0  
2.5 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - Fa (XY,Z) (Specification 314.2.2)
> 225 to < 231 2.3 Control Rod Insertion Limits (Specification 3/4.1.3.6) 2.3.1 The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown in Figure 1.
2.4 Axial Flux Difference - AFD (Specification 3/4.2.1) 2.4.1 The axial flux difference (AFD) limits (AFDLrmnt) are provided in Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C.
2.5 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - Fa (XY,Z) (Specification 314.2.2)
FQ (X,Y,Z) shall be limited by the following relationships:
FQ (X,Y,Z) shall be limited by the following relationships:
FQRTP FQ (X,Y,Z) < -
FQRTP FQ (X,Y,Z) < -
* K(Z)       for P > 0.5 P
* K(Z) for P > 0.5 P
FQRTP FQ (X,Y,Z) < -         - K(Z)       for P*< 0.5 0.5 where P = Thermal Power I Rated Thermal Power I
FQ RTP FQ (X,Y,Z) < -
RTP 2.5.1   FT     = 2.48 2.5.2   K(Z) is provided in Figure 3.
- K(Z) for P*< 0.5 0.5 where P = Thermal Power I Rated Thermal Power I
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1                               Page 3 of 14                                     Revision 1
RTP 2.5.1 FT = 2.48 2.5.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure 3.
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 Page 3 of 14 Revision 1


SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 The following parameters are required for core monitoring per the Surveillance Requirements of Specification 3/4.2.2:
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 The following parameters are required for core monitoring per the Surveillance Requirements of Specification 3/4.2.2:
2.5.3   NSLOPEAFD     = 1.18 where NSLOPEAFD         = Negative AFD limit adjustment required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BQDES.
2.5.3 NSLOPEAFD = 1.18 where NSLOPEAFD =
2.5.4    PSLOPEAFD    = 1.73 where PSLOPEAFD        =  Positive AFD limit adjustment required to compensate for each 1% that F0 (X,Y,Z) exceeds BQDES.
2.5.4 PSLOPEAFD = 1.73 Negative AFD limit adjustment required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BQDES.
2.5.5   NSLOPE2(A) = 1.38 where NSLOPE     f2 (AI) = Adjustment to negative OPAT f2(AI) limit required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BCDES.
Positive AFD limit adjustment required to compensate for each 1% that F0 (X,Y,Z) exceeds BQDES.
2.5.6   PSLOPE f2(Al   = 2.02 where PSLOPE f2(A) =       Adjustment to positive OPAT f2(AI) limit required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BCDES.
where PSLOPEAFD =
2.5.7  BQNOM(X,Y,Z)      =        Nominal design peaking factor, increased by an allowance for the expected deviation between the nominal design power distribution and the measurement.
2.5.5 NSLOPE2(A) = 1.38 where NSLOPE f2 (AI) =
2.5.8  BQDES(X,Y,Z)    =          Maximum allowable design peaking factor which ensures that the FQ (X,Y,Z) limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.
Adjustment to negative OPAT f2(AI) limit required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BCDES.
2.5.9  BCDES(X,Y,Z)    =          Maximum allowable design peaking factor which ensures that the centerline fuel melt limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.
2.5.6 PSLOPE f2(Al = 2.02 where PSLOPE f2(A) =
2.5.7 BQNOM(X,Y,Z) =
2.5.8 BQDES(X,Y,Z) =
2.5.9 BCDES(X,Y,Z) =
Adjustment to positive OPAT f2(AI) limit required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BCDES.
Nominal design peaking factor, increased by an allowance for the expected deviation between the nominal design power distribution and the measurement.
Maximum allowable design peaking factor which ensures that the FQ (X,Y,Z) limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.
Maximum allowable design peaking factor which ensures that the centerline fuel melt limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.
BQNOM(X,Y,Z), BQDES(X,Y,Z), and BCDES(X,Y,Z) data bases are provided for input to the plant power distribution analysis codes on a cycle specific basis and are determined using the methodology for core limit generation described in the references in Specification 6.9.1.14.
BQNOM(X,Y,Z), BQDES(X,Y,Z), and BCDES(X,Y,Z) data bases are provided for input to the plant power distribution analysis codes on a cycle specific basis and are determined using the methodology for core limit generation described in the references in Specification 6.9.1.14.
2.5.10 The increase in FQM (X,Y,Z) for compliance with the 4.2.2.2.e Surveillance Requirements is defined as follows:
2.5.10 The increase in FQM (X,Y,Z) for compliance with the 4.2.2.2.e Surveillance Requirements is defined as follows:
For all cycle burnups                 2.0%
For all cycle burnups 2.0%
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I                                   Page 4 of 14                                       Revision I
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 4 of 14 Revision I


SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 2.6   Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor             - FAH MXY) (Specification 3/4.2.3)
SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 2.6 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - FAH MXY) (Specification 3/4.2.3)
FAH (X,Y) shall be limited by the following relationship:
FAH (X,Y) shall be limited by the following relationship:
FAN (X,Y) < MAP(X,Y,Z) / AXIAL(X,Y) 2.6.1   MAP(X,Y,Z) is provided in Table 2.
FAN (X,Y) < MAP(X,Y,Z) / AXIAL(X,Y) 2.6.1 MAP(X,Y,Z) is provided in Table 2.
AXIAL(X,Y) is the axial peak from the normalized axial power shape.
AXIAL(X,Y) is the axial peak from the normalized axial power shape.
The following parameters are required for core monitoring per the Surveillance Requirements of Specification 3/4.2.3:
The following parameters are required for core monitoring per the Surveillance Requirements of Specification 3/4.2.3:
FAHR M (X,Y) < BHNOM(X,Y) where FAHRM (XY) =         FARM (X,Y) / [ MAPM / AXIAL(X,Y) ]
FAHR M (X,Y) < BHNOM(X,Y) where FAHRM (XY) = FARM (X,Y) / [ MAPM / AXIAL(X,Y) ]
FAHM   (X,Y) is the measured radial peak at location X,Y.
FAHM (X,Y) is the measured radial peak at location X,Y.
MAPM is the value of MAP(X,Y,Z) obtained from Table 2 for the measured peak.
MAPM is the value of MAP(X,Y,Z) obtained from Table 2 for the measured peak.
2.6.2   BHNOM(X,Y) = Nominal design radial peaking factor, increased by an allowance for the expected deviation between the nominal design power distribution and the measurement.
2.6.2 BHNOM(X,Y) = Nominal design radial peaking factor, increased by an allowance for the expected deviation between the nominal design power distribution and the measurement.
2.6.3   BHDES(X,Y) = Maximum allowable design radial peaking factor which ensures that the FAH (X,Y) limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.
2.6.3 BHDES(X,Y) =
2.6.4    BRDES(X,Y) = Maximum allowable design radial peaking factor which ensures that the steady state DNBR limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.
2.6.4 BRDES(X,Y) =
Maximum allowable design radial peaking factor which ensures that the FAH (X,Y) limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.
Maximum allowable design radial peaking factor which ensures that the steady state DNBR limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.
BHNOM(X,Y), BHDES(X,Y) and BRDES(X,Y) data bases are provided for input to the plant power distribution analysis computer codes on a cycle specific basis and are determined using the methodology for core limit generation described in the references in Specification 6.9.1.14.
BHNOM(X,Y), BHDES(X,Y) and BRDES(X,Y) data bases are provided for input to the plant power distribution analysis computer codes on a cycle specific basis and are determined using the methodology for core limit generation described in the references in Specification 6.9.1.14.
2.6.5   RRH = 3.34         when 0.8 < P < 1.0 RRH = 1.67          when P < 0.8 where RRH =        Thermal power reduction required to compensate for each 1% that         FAH(X,Y) exceeds its limit.
2.6.5 RRH = 3.34 RRH = 1.67 where RRH =
P=     Thermal Power / Rated Thermal Power SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1                                   Page 5 of 14                                       Revision I
when 0.8 < P < 1.0 when P < 0.8 Thermal power reduction required to compensate for each 1% that FAH(X,Y) exceeds its limit.
P =
Thermal Power / Rated Thermal Power SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 Page 5 of 14 Revision I


SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 3.2 Trip Reset Term f f2(AI) 1 for Overpower Delta-T Trip (Specification 2.2.1)
SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 3.2 Trip Reset Term f f2(AI) 1 for Overpower Delta-T Trip (Specification 2.2.1)
The following parameters are required to specify the power level-dependent f2(AI) trip reset term limits for the Overpower Delta-T trip function:
The following parameters are required to specify the power level-dependent f2(AI) trip reset term limits for the Overpower Delta-T trip function:
3.2.1   QPNL = -25%
3.2.1 QPNL = -25%
where QPNL = Maximum negative Al setpoint at rated thermal power at which the trip setpoint is not reduced by the axial power distribution.
where QPNL = Maximum negative Al setpoint at rated thermal power at which the trip setpoint is not reduced by the axial power distribution.
3.2.2   QPPL = +25%
3.2.2 QPPL = +25%
where QPPL = Maximum positive Al setpoint at rated thermal power at which the trip setpoint is not reduced by the axial power distribution.
where QPPL =
3.2.3    QPNS = 1.70%
3.2.3 QPNS = 1.70%
where QPNS = Percent reduction in Overpower Delta-T trip setpoint for each percent that the magnitude of Al exceeds its negative limit at rated thermal power (QPNL).
where QPNS =
3.2.4    QPPS = 1.70%
Maximum positive Al setpoint at rated thermal power at which the trip setpoint is not reduced by the axial power distribution.
where QPPS = Percent reduction in Overpower Delta-T trip setpoint for each percent that the magnitude of Al exceeds its positive limit at rated thermal power (QPPL).
Percent reduction in Overpower Delta-T trip setpoint for each percent that the magnitude of Al exceeds its negative limit at rated thermal power (QPNL).
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I                             Page 7 of 14                                       Revision I
Percent reduction in Overpower Delta-T trip setpoint for each percent that the magnitude of Al exceeds its positive limit at rated thermal power (QPPL).
3.2.4 QPPS = 1.70%
where QPPS =
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 7 of 14 Revision I


SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 Table 1 COLR Methodology Topical Reports
SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 Table 1 COLR Methodology Topical Reports
: 1. BAW-10180-A, Revision 1, "NEMO - Nodal Expansion Method Optimized," March 1993.
: 1.
BAW-10180-A, Revision 1, "NEMO - Nodal Expansion Method Optimized," March 1993.
(Methodology for Specification 3/4.1.1.3 - Moderator Temperature Coefficient)
(Methodology for Specification 3/4.1.1.3 - Moderator Temperature Coefficient)
: 2. BAW-1 01 69P-A, Revision 0, "RSG Plant Safety Analysis - B&W Safety Analysis Methodology for Recirculating Steam Generator Plants," October 1989.
: 2.
BAW-1 01 69P-A, Revision 0, "RSG Plant Safety Analysis - B&W Safety Analysis Methodology for Recirculating Steam Generator Plants," October 1989.
(Methodology for Specification 3/4.1.1.3 - Moderator Temperature Coefficient)
(Methodology for Specification 3/4.1.1.3 - Moderator Temperature Coefficient)
: 3. BAW-10163P-A, Revision 0, "Core Operating Limit Methodology for Westinghouse-Designed PWRs," June 1989.
: 3.
BAW-10163P-A, Revision 0, "Core Operating Limit Methodology for Westinghouse-Designed PWRs," June 1989.
(Methodology for Specifications 2.2.1 - Reactor Trip System Instrumentation Setpoints [f1(AI), f2(AI) limits],
(Methodology for Specifications 2.2.1 - Reactor Trip System Instrumentation Setpoints [f1(AI), f2(AI) limits],
3/4.1.3.5 - Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit, 3/4.1.3.6 - Control Rod Insertion Limits, 3/4.2.1 - Axial Flux Difference, 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor, 3/4.2.3 - Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor)
3/4.1.3.5 - Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit, 3/4.1.3.6 - Control Rod Insertion Limits, 3/4.2.1 - Axial Flux Difference, 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor, 3/4.2.3 - Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor)
: 4. BAW-10168P-A, Revision 3, "RSG LOCA- BWNT Loss of Coolant Accident Evaluation Model for Recirculating Steam Generator Plants," December 1996.
: 4.
BAW-10168P-A, Revision 3, "RSG LOCA-BWNT Loss of Coolant Accident Evaluation Model for Recirculating Steam Generator Plants," December 1996.
(Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor)
(Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor)
: 5. BAW-10227P-A, Revision 1, "Evaluation of Advanced Cladding and Structural Material (M5) in PWR Reactor Fuel," June 2003.
: 5.
BAW-10227P-A, Revision 1, "Evaluation of Advanced Cladding and Structural Material (M5) in PWR Reactor Fuel," June 2003.
(Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor)
(Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor)
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I                               Page 8 of 14                                       Revision I
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 8 of 14 Revision I


I         -.  ~
I  
~
SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 Table 2 Maximum Allowable Peaking Limits MAP(X,Y,Z)
SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 Table 2 Maximum Allowable Peaking Limits MAP(X,Y,Z)
AXIAL(X,Y)   ELEVATION (ft)    MAP(X,Y,Z)        AXIAL(X,Y) ELEVATION (ft) MAP(X,Y,Z) 1.1           2             1.9540             1.9        2          2.8169 4             1.9494                         4          3.1537 6             1.9431                         6          3.0026 8             1.9337                         8          2.8465 10             1.9147                         10        2.6987 1.2           2             2.1780             >1.9        2         2.5377 4              2.1682                          4         2.8412 6             2.1543                          6          2.7051 8              2.1317                          8          2.5644 10            2.0855                          10        2.4313
AXIAL(X,Y)
        .1.3          2             2.4025              2.2         2         2.6873 4              2.3875                          4         3.3150 6             2.3672                          6          3.1660 8              2.3029                          8          3.0227 10            2.1902                          10         2.7136 1.4          2             2.6264              2.6         2         2.6965 4              2.6047                          4         3.5807 6             2.5629                          6         3.5514 8             2.4204                          8          3.3102 10             2.2893                          10        2.9726 1.5          2              2.8525              3.0         2         2.9517 4             2.8119                          4          3.8016 6             2.6771                          6          4.1225 8             2.5251                          8          3.6877 10             2.3839                          10        3.3466 1.7          2              2.7765              3.5         2         3.1500 4             3.0191                          4          4.1097 6             2.8610                          6          4.1197 8             2.7036                          8          3.7296 10             2.5528                          10        3.4811 SEQUOYAH - UNIT I                         Page 9 of 14                           Revision 1
ELEVATION (ft)
MAP(X,Y,Z) 1.1 2
1.9540 4
1.9494 6
1.9431 8
1.9337 10 1.9147 1.2 2
2.1780 4
2.1682 6
2.1543 8
2.1317 10 2.0855
.1.3 2
2.4025 4
2.3875 6
2.3672 8
2.3029 10 2.1902 1.4 2
2.6264 4
2.6047 6
2.5629 8
2.4204 10 2.2893 1.5 2
2.8525 4
2.8119 6
2.6771 8
2.5251 10 2.3839 1.7 2
2.7765 4
3.0191 6
2.8610 8
2.7036 10 2.5528 AXIAL(X,Y)
ELEVATION (ft)
MAP(X,Y,Z) 1.9 2
2.8169 4
3.1537 6
3.0026 8
2.8465 10 2.6987
>1.9 2
2.5377 4
2.8412 6
2.7051 8
2.5644 10 2.4313 2.2 2
2.6873 4
3.3150 6
3.1660 8
3.0227 10 2.7136 2.6 2
2.6965 4
3.5807 6
3.5514 8
3.3102 10 2.9726 3.0 2
2.9517 4
3.8016 6
4.1225 8
3.6877 10 3.3466 3.5 2
3.1500 4
4.1097 6
4.1197 8
3.7296 10 3.4811 SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 9 of 14 Revision 1


SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 220       -      - --                        44552s-     4 200           . - ..
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 220 44552s-4 200 o 140____
0,11 o 140____                                                __        ____
0,11
            .2  1600                            _    _    _          _          _
~120 180 (0,110)
            ~120                                                                     _
.2 1600 80 BANTIAN D
80 180     (0,110)             BANTIAN                       D   _
014 I1 60o_
014 I1     60o_                                                                 _
(0.09,0I 0
(0.09,0I 0
0             0.2         0.4         0.6         0.8 (Fully Inserted)
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 (Fully Inserted)
Fraction of Rated Thermal Power FIGURE 1 Rod Bank Insertion Limits Versus Thermal Power, Four Loop Operation
Fraction of Rated Thermal Power FIGURE 1 Rod Bank Insertion Limits Versus Thermal Power, Four Loop Operation
              *Fully withdrawn region shall be the condition where shutdown and control banks are at a position within the interval of >_225 and <_231 steps withdrawn, inclusive.
*Fully withdrawn region shall be the condition where shutdown and control banks are at a position within the interval of >_225 and <_231 steps withdrawn, inclusive.
Fully withdrawn shall be the position as defined below, Cycle Burnup (MWd/mtU)                         Steps Withdrawn
Fully withdrawn shall be the position as defined below, Cycle Burnup (MWd/mtU)
                                  >0                                 >225 to <231 This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.
Steps Withdrawn
>0  
>225 to <231 This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.
If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maximum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the rod insertion limit lines must be increased by 3 steps withdrawn until the LEFM is returned to operation.
If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maximum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the rod insertion limit lines must be increased by 3 steps withdrawn until the LEFM is returned to operation.
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1                                       Page 10 of 14                               Revision I
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 Page 10 of 14 Revision I


SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 120             1 110         - +     --              +       *--            i
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 120 1
(-11,100)             (7,100) 100                             --                    &#xfd; -     -  __      ___
110  
Ulacceptabl                                       Jnac eptarle 90 --                               L7Operatio---           -Orail--
- +  
S     -                            Ac       able 70E                               -Op       ion-M=
+
I--  60                                              _                                --
i
S50     -
(-11,100)
(-40,50)                                                     (28,50) 40____                                                                   __
(7,100) 100  
0 d-30                                                 _
&#xfd; -
20       -_                                          _      _      _      _  _
Ulacceptabl Jnac eptarle 90 --
10                                             _                    _      _
L7 Operatio---  
0          I       I       I               ! I               I
-Orail--
                    -50       -40 -30     -20     -10     0     10       20       30     40     50 Flux Difference (delta I) %
S Ac able 70E  
-Op ion-M=
60 I--
S50
(-40,50)
(28,50) 40____
0 d-30 20 10 0
I I
I  
! I I
-50  
-40  
-30  
-20  
-10 0
10 20 30 40 50 Flux Difference (delta I) %
FIGURE 2B Axial Flux Difference Limits As A Function of Thermal Power For Burnup Range of 254+10 EFPD to 431+10 EFPD This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.
FIGURE 2B Axial Flux Difference Limits As A Function of Thermal Power For Burnup Range of 254+10 EFPD to 431+10 EFPD This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.
If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maximum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the AFD limit lines must be made more restrictive by 1%
If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maximum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the AFD limit lines must be made more restrictive by 1%
in AFD until the LEFM is returned to operation.
in AFD until the LEFM is returned to operation.
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I                                     Page 12 of 14                                   Revision 1
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 12 of 14 Revision 1


SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 120 110           +_                                                          _      _
SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 120 110  
(-13,100)       (5,100) 100     Uaptab~                                         naccepta le 90g-oOeraior                       _              _              --Ope     ratiol o       80                                                 -                __                - -
+_
I.                                                     aeptble E 70           -                          Vd                                                     -on
(-13,100)
          .        60                           L_ I_                       L_
(5,100) 100 Uaptab~
60-a)     50                                               __                          __
naccepta le 90g-oOeraior  
(-40,50)             F-                           F               ('28,50)T
--Ope ratiol o
              .~40         -_  +__
80 I.
aeptble E 70 Vd  
-on 60 L_
I_
L_
60-a) 50
(-40,50)
F-F
('28,50)T
.~40  
+__
0
0
              ~30___
~30___
20__                             ____                    __  __    __      __    __
20__
o0                     I t I               I                   I             I
o0 I
                      -50     -40     -30   -20   -10         0         10     20       30       40   50 Flux Difference (delta I) %
I I
t I
I
-50  
-40  
-30  
-20  
-10 0
10 20 30 40 50 Flux Difference (delta I) %
FIGURE 2C Axial Flux Difference Limits As A Function of Thermal Power For Burnup Range of 431+10 EFPD to EOC This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.
FIGURE 2C Axial Flux Difference Limits As A Function of Thermal Power For Burnup Range of 431+10 EFPD to EOC This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.
If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maxdmum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the AFD limit lines must be made more restrictive by 1%
If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maxdmum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the AFD limit lines must be made more restrictive by 1%
in AFD until the LEFM is returned to operation.
in AFD until the LEFM is returned to operation.
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I                                         Page 13 of 14                                         Revision 1
SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 13 of 14 Revision 1


SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 1.2 1.0 0.8
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0
      -. 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0       2       4         6       8     10       12 Core Height (Feet)
2 4
FIGURE 3 K(Z) - Normalized FQ(XYZ) as a Function of Core Height SEQUOYAH - UNIT I                   Page 14 of 14                   Revision I}}
6 8
10 12 Core Height (Feet)
FIGURE 3 K(Z) - Normalized FQ(XYZ) as a Function of Core Height SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 14 of 14 Revision I}}

Latest revision as of 03:16, 15 January 2025

Cycle 15 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) Revision 1
ML070440147
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 01/31/2007
From: Morris G
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML070440147 (14)


Text

Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee 37384-2000 January 31, 2007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:

Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555 Gentlemen:

In the Matter of

)

Docket No.

50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN)

UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)

REVISION 1 In accordance with the SQN Unit 1 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.14.c, enclosed is the revised Unit 1 Cycle 15 COLR.

The COLR was revised to incorporate changes in the heat flux hot channel factor, elevation dependant adjustment factor, and the axial flux difference limits.

These revised factors were necessary to improve operating margins for SQN Unit 1.

Please direct questions concerning this issue to me at (423) 843-7170.

Sincerely, Glenn W. Morris Manager, Site Licensing and Industry Affairs Enclosure A4o/

Printed on recycled paper

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 January 31, 2007 cc (Enclosure):

Mr.

Brendan T.

Moroney, Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear.Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08G-9a One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2739

SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT

'REVISION 1 January 2007 Prepared by:

Original Signed byT. D. Beu

/ January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering Date Verified by:

Original Signed by B. S. Catalanotto

/ January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering Date Reviewed by:

Original Signed by C. S. Faulkner

/ January 18, 2007 PWR Fuel Engineering Manager Date Original Signed by C. A. Griffin

/ January 19, 2007 Reactor Engineering Supervisor Date Approved by:

Original Signed by M. H. Palmer

/ January 23, 2007 PORC Chairman Date Original Signed by D. A. Kulisek

/ January 24, 2007 Plant Manager Date Revision 1

Pages affected 1. 3.4, 12-14 Reason for Revision To incorporate changes in the FQ limit, K(Z) curve, and AFD limits due to a revised Large Break LOCA analysis to improve operatinq margins SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Revision I Page 1 of 14

SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Sequoyah Unit 1 Cycle 15 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification (TS) 6.9.1.14.

The TSs affected by this report are listed below:

TABLE 2.2-1 f1(AI) trip reset function for OTAT Trip (QTNL, QTPL) and rates of trip setpoint decrease per percent Al (QTNS, QTPS)

TABLE 2.2-1 f2(AI) trip reset function for OPAT Trip (QPNL, QPPL) and rates of trip setpoint decrease per percent Al (QPNS, QPPS) 3/4.1.1.3 Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) 3/4.1.3.5 Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit 3/4.1.3.6 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3/4.2.1 Axial Flux Difference (AFD) 3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor (FQ(X,Y,Z))

3/4.2.3 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor (FAH(X,Y))

2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in section 1.0 are presented in the following subsections. These limits have been developed using the NRC approved methodologies specified in TS 6.9.1.14. The versions of the topical reports which describe the methodologies used for this cycle are listed in Table 1.

The following abbreviations are used in this section:

BOL stands for Beginning of Cycle Life ARO stands for All Rods Out HZP stands for Hot Zero THERMAL POWER EOL stands for End of Cycle Life RTP stands for RATED THERMAL POWER 2.1 Moderator Temperature Coefficient - MTC (Specification 3/4.1.1.3) 2.1.1 The MTC limits are:

The BOL/ARO/HZP MTC shall be less positive than 0 Ak/k/°F (BOL limit). With the measured BOL/ARO/HZP MTC more positive than -0.16 x 10-5 Ak/k/°F (as-measured MTC limit), establish control rod withdrawal limits to ensure the MTC remains less positive than 0 Ak/k/°F for all times in core life.

The EOL/ARO/RTP MTC shall be less negative than or equal to -4.5 x 10-4 Ak/k/0F.

SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 Page 2 of 14 Revision 1

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 2.1.2 The 300 ppm surveillance limit is:

The measured 300 ppm/ARO/RTP MTC should be less negative than or equal to

-3.75 x 10 -4 Ak/k/°F.

2.2 Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit (Specification 314.1.3.5) 2.2.1 The shutdown rods shall be withdrawn to a position as defined below:

Cycle Burnup (MWD/MTU)

Steps Withdrawn

> 0

> 225 to < 231 2.3 Control Rod Insertion Limits (Specification 3/4.1.3.6) 2.3.1 The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown in Figure 1.

2.4 Axial Flux Difference - AFD (Specification 3/4.2.1) 2.4.1 The axial flux difference (AFD) limits (AFDLrmnt) are provided in Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C.

2.5 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - Fa (XY,Z) (Specification 314.2.2)

FQ (X,Y,Z) shall be limited by the following relationships:

FQRTP FQ (X,Y,Z) < -

  • K(Z) for P > 0.5 P

FQ RTP FQ (X,Y,Z) < -

- K(Z) for P*< 0.5 0.5 where P = Thermal Power I Rated Thermal Power I

RTP 2.5.1 FT = 2.48 2.5.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure 3.

SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 Page 3 of 14 Revision 1

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 The following parameters are required for core monitoring per the Surveillance Requirements of Specification 3/4.2.2:

2.5.3 NSLOPEAFD = 1.18 where NSLOPEAFD =

2.5.4 PSLOPEAFD = 1.73 Negative AFD limit adjustment required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BQDES.

Positive AFD limit adjustment required to compensate for each 1% that F0 (X,Y,Z) exceeds BQDES.

where PSLOPEAFD =

2.5.5 NSLOPE2(A) = 1.38 where NSLOPE f2 (AI) =

Adjustment to negative OPAT f2(AI) limit required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BCDES.

2.5.6 PSLOPE f2(Al = 2.02 where PSLOPE f2(A) =

2.5.7 BQNOM(X,Y,Z) =

2.5.8 BQDES(X,Y,Z) =

2.5.9 BCDES(X,Y,Z) =

Adjustment to positive OPAT f2(AI) limit required to compensate for each 1% that FQ (X,Y,Z) exceeds BCDES.

Nominal design peaking factor, increased by an allowance for the expected deviation between the nominal design power distribution and the measurement.

Maximum allowable design peaking factor which ensures that the FQ (X,Y,Z) limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.

Maximum allowable design peaking factor which ensures that the centerline fuel melt limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.

BQNOM(X,Y,Z), BQDES(X,Y,Z), and BCDES(X,Y,Z) data bases are provided for input to the plant power distribution analysis codes on a cycle specific basis and are determined using the methodology for core limit generation described in the references in Specification 6.9.1.14.

2.5.10 The increase in FQM (X,Y,Z) for compliance with the 4.2.2.2.e Surveillance Requirements is defined as follows:

For all cycle burnups 2.0%

SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 4 of 14 Revision I

SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 2.6 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - FAH MXY) (Specification 3/4.2.3)

FAH (X,Y) shall be limited by the following relationship:

FAN (X,Y) < MAP(X,Y,Z) / AXIAL(X,Y) 2.6.1 MAP(X,Y,Z) is provided in Table 2.

AXIAL(X,Y) is the axial peak from the normalized axial power shape.

The following parameters are required for core monitoring per the Surveillance Requirements of Specification 3/4.2.3:

FAHR M (X,Y) < BHNOM(X,Y) where FAHRM (XY) = FARM (X,Y) / [ MAPM / AXIAL(X,Y) ]

FAHM (X,Y) is the measured radial peak at location X,Y.

MAPM is the value of MAP(X,Y,Z) obtained from Table 2 for the measured peak.

2.6.2 BHNOM(X,Y) = Nominal design radial peaking factor, increased by an allowance for the expected deviation between the nominal design power distribution and the measurement.

2.6.3 BHDES(X,Y) =

2.6.4 BRDES(X,Y) =

Maximum allowable design radial peaking factor which ensures that the FAH (X,Y) limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.

Maximum allowable design radial peaking factor which ensures that the steady state DNBR limit will be preserved for operation within the LCO limits, including allowances for calculational and measurement uncertainties.

BHNOM(X,Y), BHDES(X,Y) and BRDES(X,Y) data bases are provided for input to the plant power distribution analysis computer codes on a cycle specific basis and are determined using the methodology for core limit generation described in the references in Specification 6.9.1.14.

2.6.5 RRH = 3.34 RRH = 1.67 where RRH =

when 0.8 < P < 1.0 when P < 0.8 Thermal power reduction required to compensate for each 1% that FAH(X,Y) exceeds its limit.

P =

Thermal Power / Rated Thermal Power SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 Page 5 of 14 Revision I

SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 3.2 Trip Reset Term f f2(AI) 1 for Overpower Delta-T Trip (Specification 2.2.1)

The following parameters are required to specify the power level-dependent f2(AI) trip reset term limits for the Overpower Delta-T trip function:

3.2.1 QPNL = -25%

where QPNL = Maximum negative Al setpoint at rated thermal power at which the trip setpoint is not reduced by the axial power distribution.

3.2.2 QPPL = +25%

where QPPL =

3.2.3 QPNS = 1.70%

where QPNS =

Maximum positive Al setpoint at rated thermal power at which the trip setpoint is not reduced by the axial power distribution.

Percent reduction in Overpower Delta-T trip setpoint for each percent that the magnitude of Al exceeds its negative limit at rated thermal power (QPNL).

Percent reduction in Overpower Delta-T trip setpoint for each percent that the magnitude of Al exceeds its positive limit at rated thermal power (QPPL).

3.2.4 QPPS = 1.70%

where QPPS =

SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 7 of 14 Revision I

SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 Table 1 COLR Methodology Topical Reports

1.

BAW-10180-A, Revision 1, "NEMO - Nodal Expansion Method Optimized," March 1993.

(Methodology for Specification 3/4.1.1.3 - Moderator Temperature Coefficient)

2.

BAW-1 01 69P-A, Revision 0, "RSG Plant Safety Analysis - B&W Safety Analysis Methodology for Recirculating Steam Generator Plants," October 1989.

(Methodology for Specification 3/4.1.1.3 - Moderator Temperature Coefficient)

3.

BAW-10163P-A, Revision 0, "Core Operating Limit Methodology for Westinghouse-Designed PWRs," June 1989.

(Methodology for Specifications 2.2.1 - Reactor Trip System Instrumentation Setpoints [f1(AI), f2(AI) limits],

3/4.1.3.5 - Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit, 3/4.1.3.6 - Control Rod Insertion Limits, 3/4.2.1 - Axial Flux Difference, 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor, 3/4.2.3 - Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor)

4.

BAW-10168P-A, Revision 3, "RSG LOCA-BWNT Loss of Coolant Accident Evaluation Model for Recirculating Steam Generator Plants," December 1996.

(Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor)

5.

BAW-10227P-A, Revision 1, "Evaluation of Advanced Cladding and Structural Material (M5) in PWR Reactor Fuel," June 2003.

(Methodology for Specification 3/4.2.2 - Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor)

SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 8 of 14 Revision I

I

~

SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 Table 2 Maximum Allowable Peaking Limits MAP(X,Y,Z)

AXIAL(X,Y)

ELEVATION (ft)

MAP(X,Y,Z) 1.1 2

1.9540 4

1.9494 6

1.9431 8

1.9337 10 1.9147 1.2 2

2.1780 4

2.1682 6

2.1543 8

2.1317 10 2.0855

.1.3 2

2.4025 4

2.3875 6

2.3672 8

2.3029 10 2.1902 1.4 2

2.6264 4

2.6047 6

2.5629 8

2.4204 10 2.2893 1.5 2

2.8525 4

2.8119 6

2.6771 8

2.5251 10 2.3839 1.7 2

2.7765 4

3.0191 6

2.8610 8

2.7036 10 2.5528 AXIAL(X,Y)

ELEVATION (ft)

MAP(X,Y,Z) 1.9 2

2.8169 4

3.1537 6

3.0026 8

2.8465 10 2.6987

>1.9 2

2.5377 4

2.8412 6

2.7051 8

2.5644 10 2.4313 2.2 2

2.6873 4

3.3150 6

3.1660 8

3.0227 10 2.7136 2.6 2

2.6965 4

3.5807 6

3.5514 8

3.3102 10 2.9726 3.0 2

2.9517 4

3.8016 6

4.1225 8

3.6877 10 3.3466 3.5 2

3.1500 4

4.1097 6

4.1197 8

3.7296 10 3.4811 SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 9 of 14 Revision 1

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 220 44552s-4 200 o 140____

0,11

~120 180 (0,110)

.2 1600 80 BANTIAN D

014 I1 60o_

(0.09,0I 0

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 (Fully Inserted)

Fraction of Rated Thermal Power FIGURE 1 Rod Bank Insertion Limits Versus Thermal Power, Four Loop Operation

  • Fully withdrawn region shall be the condition where shutdown and control banks are at a position within the interval of >_225 and <_231 steps withdrawn, inclusive.

Fully withdrawn shall be the position as defined below, Cycle Burnup (MWd/mtU)

Steps Withdrawn

>0

>225 to <231 This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.

If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maximum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the rod insertion limit lines must be increased by 3 steps withdrawn until the LEFM is returned to operation.

SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 Page 10 of 14 Revision I

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 120 1

110

- +

+

i

(-11,100)

(7,100) 100

ý -

Ulacceptabl Jnac eptarle 90 --

L7 Operatio---

-Orail--

S Ac able 70E

-Op ion-M=

60 I--

S50

(-40,50)

(28,50) 40____

0 d-30 20 10 0

I I

I

! I I

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10 0

10 20 30 40 50 Flux Difference (delta I) %

FIGURE 2B Axial Flux Difference Limits As A Function of Thermal Power For Burnup Range of 254+10 EFPD to 431+10 EFPD This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.

If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maximum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the AFD limit lines must be made more restrictive by 1%

in AFD until the LEFM is returned to operation.

SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 12 of 14 Revision 1

SEQUOYAH UNIT I CYCLE 15 120 110

+_

(-13,100)

(5,100) 100 Uaptab~

naccepta le 90g-oOeraior

--Ope ratiol o

80 I.

aeptble E 70 Vd

-on 60 L_

I_

L_

60-a) 50

(-40,50)

F-F

('28,50)T

.~40

+__

0

~30___

20__

o0 I

I I

t I

I

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10 0

10 20 30 40 50 Flux Difference (delta I) %

FIGURE 2C Axial Flux Difference Limits As A Function of Thermal Power For Burnup Range of 431+10 EFPD to EOC This figure is valid for operation at a rated thermal power of 3455 MWt when the LEFM is in operation.

If the LEFM becomes inoperable, then prior to the next NIS calibration, the maxdmum allowable power level must be reduced by 1.3% in power, and the AFD limit lines must be made more restrictive by 1%

in AFD until the LEFM is returned to operation.

SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 13 of 14 Revision 1

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 CYCLE 15 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0

2 4

6 8

10 12 Core Height (Feet)

FIGURE 3 K(Z) - Normalized FQ(XYZ) as a Function of Core Height SEQUOYAH - UNIT I Page 14 of 14 Revision I