IR 05000331/2014502: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:May 14, 2014 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER | |||
BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000331/2014502 | |||
==Dear Mr. Anderson:== | ==Dear Mr. Anderson:== | ||
On April 11, | On April 11, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Duane Arnold Energy Center. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, which were discussed on April 11, 2014, with you and other members of your staff. | ||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the | The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | ||
No findings were identified during this inspection. | The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. No findings were identified during this inspection. | ||
In accordance with | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) | ||
component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), | ||
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA Billy Dickson Acting for/ | /RA Billy Dickson Acting for/ | ||
DPR-49 | Richard A. Skokowski, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49 | ||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Inspection Report | Inspection Report 05000331/2014502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | ||
REGION III== | REGION III== | ||
Docket No: 50- | Docket No: | ||
50-331 License No: | |||
R. Jickling, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector J. Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector J. Kutlesa , Physical Security Inspector N. Valos , Senior Reactor Analyst J. Laughlin , Emergency Preparedness Inspector Approved by: | DPR-49 Report No: | ||
R. Skokowski, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety | 05000331/2014502 Licensee: | ||
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC Facility: | |||
Duane Arnold Energy Center Location: | |||
Palo, IA Dates: | |||
April 7 - 11, 2014 Inspectors: | |||
R. Jickling, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector | |||
J. Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector | |||
J. Kutlesa, Physical Security Inspector | |||
N. Valos, Senior Reactor Analyst | |||
J. Laughlin, Emergency Preparedness Inspector Approved by: | |||
R. Skokowski, Chief | |||
Plant Support Branch | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | =SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | ||
IR | IR 05000331/2014502; 04/7/2014 - 04/11/2014; Duane Arnold Energy Center; Baseline | ||
Emergency Preparedness Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event; Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification. | |||
=== | This report covers a one-week period of announced baseline inspection by four regional inspectors and one emergency preparedness specialist. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (i.e., Green, White, Yellow, and Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5, dated February 2014. | ||
and Self-Revealed Findings | |||
===NRC-Identified=== | |||
and Self-Revealed Findings | |||
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
=== | ===Licensee-Identified Violations=== | ||
None | |||
None | |||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | |||
{{a|1EP7}} | |||
== | ==1EP7 Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.07}} | |||
{{ | |||
= | |||
===.1 Exercise Evaluation=== | ===.1 Exercise Evaluation=== | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, requires , in part, that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their Emergency Response Organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a Hostile Action (HA) event directed at the plant site. Duane Arnold Energy Center designed the April 9, | Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, requires, in part, that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their Emergency Response Organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a Hostile Action (HA) event directed at the plant site. Duane Arnold Energy Center designed the April 9, 2014, exercise to satisfy this requirement, and the NRC inspected the Duane Arnold Energy Center HA event exercise to assess the licensees ability to effectively implement their Emergency Plan during a HA event and adequately protect public health and safety. | ||
The exercise evaluation consisted of the following reviews and assessments: | The exercise evaluation consisted of the following reviews and assessments: | ||
The adequacy of the | * The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise conducted on April 9, 2014, regarding the implementation of the Risk-Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10), which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and Protective Action Recommendations (PARs), respectively. | ||
-Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10), which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and Protective Action Recommendations (PARs), respectively. | * The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Alternative Emergency Response Facility, Incident Command Post, Central Alarm Station, and the Emergency Operations Facility. | ||
* A review of other performance areas such as the licensee EROs recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures. | |||
* Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions, as demonstrated during this exercise, to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | |||
* The adequacy of the licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Duane Arnold Energy Centers self-assessment of its ERO performance during the April 9, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g. | |||
The | The inspectors reviewed various documents that are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | ||
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.07-06. | |||
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. {{a|1EP8}} | ||
==1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review== | |||
== | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.08}} | ||
- Scenario Review ( | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenarios submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Emergency Plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This inspection activity represents one sample on a biennial cycle. | |||
The inspectors reviewed various documents that are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | |||
This review of the exercise objectives and scenario constituted one sample as defined in IP 71114.08 | This review of the exercise objectives and scenario constituted one sample as defined in IP 71114.08-06. | ||
-06. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 119: | Line 125: | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ||
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | |||
{{a|4OA1}} | |||
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification== | ==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151}} | |||
===.1 Drill/Exercise Performance=== | ===.1 Drill/Exercise Performance=== | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | |||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP) | |||
Performance Indicator (PI) for the period from the second quarter 2013 through the fourth quarter 2013. To determine the accuracy of the DEP data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)document NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes, including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. | |||
This inspection constituted one DEP sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 138: | Line 142: | ||
===.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation=== | ===.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation=== | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the ERO Drill Participation PI for the period from the second quarter | The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the ERO Drill Participation PI for the period from the second quarter 2013 through the fourth quarter 2013. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, performance during the 2013 drills, and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key ERO positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report. | ||
This inspection constituted one ERO Drill Participation sample as defined in | This inspection constituted one ERO Drill Participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | ||
IP 71151-05. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 150: | Line 151: | ||
===.3 Alert and Notification System=== | ===.3 Alert and Notification System=== | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | |||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) | |||
PI for the period from the second quarter 2013 through the fourth quarter 2013. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. | |||
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. | |||
This inspection constituted one ANS sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | This inspection constituted one ANS sample as defined in IP 71151-05. | ||
| Line 158: | Line 161: | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | |||
==4OA6 Management Meetings== | ==4OA6 Management Meetings== | ||
===.1=== | |||
===.1 Exit Meeting Summary=== | ===Exit Meeting Summary=== | ||
On April 11, 2014, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. R. Anderson and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. | |||
On April 11, | |||
The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary. | The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary. | ||
===.2 Public and Media Briefing=== | ===.2 Public and Media Briefing=== | ||
On April 11, 2014, the inspector summarized the NRC's preliminary exercise inspection conclusions at a public and media briefing hosted by the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region VII Field Office staff at the Lynn County Building in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. | |||
ATTACHMENT: | |||
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | ||
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | |||
Licensee | |||
: [[contact::R. Anderson]], Site Vice President | : [[contact::R. Anderson]], Site Vice President | ||
: [[contact::G. Pry]], Plant General Manager | : [[contact::G. Pry]], Plant General Manager | ||
: [[contact::W. Bentley]], Maintenance Director | : [[contact::W. Bentley]], Maintenance Director | ||
: [[contact::M. Davis]], Emergency Preparedness and Licensing Manager | : [[contact::M. Davis]], Emergency Preparedness and Licensing Manager | ||
: [[contact::M. Fritz]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist | : [[contact::M. Fritz]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist | ||
: [[contact::S. Haller]], Design Engineering Manager | : [[contact::S. Haller]], Design Engineering Manager | ||
: [[contact::R. Harter]], | : [[contact::R. Harter]], Projects Manager | ||
: [[contact::G. Hawkins]], System Engineering Manager | |||
: [[contact::G. Hawkins]], System Engineering Manager | : [[contact::L. Helms]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator | ||
: [[contact::L. Helms]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator | : [[contact::C. Hill]], Training Manager | ||
: [[contact::C. Hill]], Training Manager | : [[contact::S. Inghram]], Systems Engineering Manager | ||
: [[contact::S. Inghram]], Systems Engineering Manager | : [[contact::K. Kleinheinz]], Engineering Director | ||
: [[contact::K. Kleinheinz]], Engineering | : [[contact::P. Louis]], Health Physics Supervisor | ||
: [[contact::H. Maloney]], Human Resources Manager | |||
: [[contact::P. Louis]], Health Physics Supervisor | : [[contact::R. Mothena]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness Director | ||
: [[contact::H. Maloney]], Human Resources Manager | : [[contact::B. Murrell]], Licensing Engineer Analyst | ||
: [[contact::R. Mothena]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness Director | : [[contact::R. Palmer]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator | ||
: [[contact::B. Murrell]], Licensing Engineer Analyst | : [[contact::K. Peveler]], Nuclear Oversight Manager | ||
: [[contact::R. Palmer]], Emergency Preparedness Coordinator | : [[contact::P. Polfleit]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness Specialist | ||
: [[contact::K. Peveler]], Nuclear Oversight Manager | : [[contact::R. Porter]], Radiation Protection Manager | ||
: [[contact::P. Polfleit]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness Specialist | : [[contact::J. Schwertfeger]], Security Manager | ||
: [[contact::R. Porter]], Radiation Protection Manager | : [[contact::B. Seemann]], Maintenance Training Supervisor | ||
: [[contact::J. Schwertfeger]], Security Manager | : [[contact::L. Swenzinski]], Licensing Engineer | ||
: [[contact::B. Seemann]], Maintenance Training Supervisor | : [[contact::P. Vandersee]], Emergency Preparedness Administrative | ||
: [[contact::L. Swenzinski]], Licensing Engineer | : [[contact::T. Weaver]], Senior Licensing Engineer | ||
: [[contact::P. Vandersee]], Emergency Preparedness Administrative | : [[contact::R. Wheaton]], Operations Director | ||
: [[contact::T. Weaver]], Senior Licensing Engineer | Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
: [[contact::R. Wheaton]], Operations Director | : [[contact::L. Haeg]], Senior Resident Inspector | ||
: [[contact::L. Haeg ]], Senior Resident Inspector | |||
LIST OF | ==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ||
===Opened, Closed, and Discussed=== | |||
None | |||
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:46, 10 January 2025
| ML14135A160 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold |
| Issue date: | 05/14/2014 |
| From: | Richard Skokowski Plant Support Branch II |
| To: | Richard Anderson NextEra Energy Duane Arnold |
| Robert Jickling | |
| References | |
| IR-14-502 | |
| Download: ML14135A160 (11) | |
Text
May 14, 2014
SUBJECT:
DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER
BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000331/2014502
Dear Mr. Anderson:
On April 11, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Duane Arnold Energy Center. The enclosed report documents the results of this inspection, which were discussed on April 11, 2014, with you and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. No findings were identified during this inspection.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS)
component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS),
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA Billy Dickson Acting for/
Richard A. Skokowski, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000331/2014502 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
REGION III==
Docket No:
50-331 License No:
DPR-49 Report No:
05000331/2014502 Licensee:
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC Facility:
Duane Arnold Energy Center Location:
Palo, IA Dates:
April 7 - 11, 2014 Inspectors:
R. Jickling, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector
J. Beavers, Emergency Preparedness Inspector
J. Kutlesa, Physical Security Inspector
N. Valos, Senior Reactor Analyst
J. Laughlin, Emergency Preparedness Inspector Approved by:
R. Skokowski, Chief
Plant Support Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000331/2014502; 04/7/2014 - 04/11/2014; Duane Arnold Energy Center; Baseline
Emergency Preparedness Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event; Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification.
This report covers a one-week period of announced baseline inspection by four regional inspectors and one emergency preparedness specialist. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (i.e., Green, White, Yellow, and Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5, dated February 2014.
NRC-Identified
and Self-Revealed Findings
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
No findings were identified.
Licensee-Identified Violations
None
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP7 Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event
.1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix E,Section IV.F.2.j, requires, in part, that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their Emergency Response Organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a Hostile Action (HA) event directed at the plant site. Duane Arnold Energy Center designed the April 9, 2014, exercise to satisfy this requirement, and the NRC inspected the Duane Arnold Energy Center HA event exercise to assess the licensees ability to effectively implement their Emergency Plan during a HA event and adequately protect public health and safety.
The exercise evaluation consisted of the following reviews and assessments:
- The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise conducted on April 9, 2014, regarding the implementation of the Risk-Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10), which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and Protective Action Recommendations (PARs), respectively.
- The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Alternative Emergency Response Facility, Incident Command Post, Central Alarm Station, and the Emergency Operations Facility.
- A review of other performance areas such as the licensee EROs recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.
- Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions, as demonstrated during this exercise, to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
- The adequacy of the licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Duane Arnold Energy Centers self-assessment of its ERO performance during the April 9, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.
The inspectors reviewed various documents that are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.07-06.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenarios submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Emergency Plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This inspection activity represents one sample on a biennial cycle.
The inspectors reviewed various documents that are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
This review of the exercise objectives and scenario constituted one sample as defined in IP 71114.08-06.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
.1 Drill/Exercise Performance
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
Performance Indicator (PI) for the period from the second quarter 2013 through the fourth quarter 2013. To determine the accuracy of the DEP data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)document NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes, including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
This inspection constituted one DEP sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Emergency Response Organization Drill Participation
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the ERO Drill Participation PI for the period from the second quarter 2013 through the fourth quarter 2013. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI, performance during the 2013 drills, and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key ERO positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the to this report.
This inspection constituted one ERO Drill Participation sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.3 Alert and Notification System
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS)
PI for the period from the second quarter 2013 through the fourth quarter 2013. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
This inspection constituted one ANS sample as defined in IP 71151-05.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Management Meetings
.1
Exit Meeting Summary
On April 11, 2014, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. R. Anderson and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented.
The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.
.2 Public and Media Briefing
On April 11, 2014, the inspector summarized the NRC's preliminary exercise inspection conclusions at a public and media briefing hosted by the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region VII Field Office staff at the Lynn County Building in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee
- R. Anderson, Site Vice President
- G. Pry, Plant General Manager
- W. Bentley, Maintenance Director
- M. Davis, Emergency Preparedness and Licensing Manager
- M. Fritz, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- S. Haller, Design Engineering Manager
- R. Harter, Projects Manager
- G. Hawkins, System Engineering Manager
- L. Helms, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
- C. Hill, Training Manager
- S. Inghram, Systems Engineering Manager
- K. Kleinheinz, Engineering Director
- P. Louis, Health Physics Supervisor
- H. Maloney, Human Resources Manager
- R. Mothena, Corporate Emergency Preparedness Director
- B. Murrell, Licensing Engineer Analyst
- R. Palmer, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
- K. Peveler, Nuclear Oversight Manager
- P. Polfleit, Corporate Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- R. Porter, Radiation Protection Manager
- J. Schwertfeger, Security Manager
- B. Seemann, Maintenance Training Supervisor
- L. Swenzinski, Licensing Engineer
- P. Vandersee, Emergency Preparedness Administrative
- T. Weaver, Senior Licensing Engineer
- R. Wheaton, Operations Director
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- L. Haeg, Senior Resident Inspector
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened, Closed, and Discussed
None