Information Notice 2004-19, Problems Associated with Back-up Power Supplies to Emergency Response Facilities and Equipment: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555November 4, 2004NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-19:PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH BACK-UPPOWER SUPPLIES TO EMERGENCY
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES


===RESPONSE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT===
===NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION===
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
===WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555===
November 4, 2004 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-19:
PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH BACK-UP
 
===POWER SUPPLIES TO EMERGENCY===
RESPONSE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT


==ADDRESSEES==
==ADDRESSEES==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have
 
permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed


from the reactor vessel.
from the reactor vessel.


==PURPOSE==
==PURPOSE==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alertaddressees to problems with back-up power supplies for emergency response facilities (ERFs)and equipment.  Emergency response equipment and ERFs need to be functional in the event
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert
 
addressees to problems with back-up power supplies for emergency response facilities (ERFs)
and equipment.  Emergency response equipment and ERFs need to be functional in the event
 
of an emergency.  It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to


of an emergency.  It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability totheir facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.  However,suggestions contained in this information notice are not
their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.  However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no


NRC requirements; therefore, nospecific action or written response is required.
specific action or written response is required.


==BACKGROUND==
==BACKGROUND==
The ERF and emergency response equipment requirements must meet the following standardof Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Paragraph 47(b)(8):Adequate emergency facilities and equipment to support the emergency response areprovided and maintained.Requirements are also found in Section IV.E "Emergency Facilities and Equipment" ofAppendix E to 10 CFR Part 50:Adequate provisions shall be made and described for emergency facilities andequipment, including:A licensee onsite technical support center (TSC) and a licensee near-site emergencyoperations facility from which effective direction can be given and effective control canbe exercised during an emergency.
The ERF and emergency response equipment requirements must meet the following standard
 
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Paragraph 47(b)(8):
Adequate emergency facilities and equipment to support the emergency response are
 
provided and maintained.
 
Requirements are also found in Section IV.E Emergency Facilities and Equipment of
 
Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50:
Adequate provisions shall be made and described for emergency facilities and
 
equipment, including:
A licensee onsite technical support center (TSC) and a licensee near-site emergency
 
operations facility from which effective direction can be given and effective control can
 
be exercised during an emergency.


==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
Line 38: Line 70:


==DISCUSSION==
==DISCUSSION==
TSC Emergency Diesel Generator Switch MisalignmentOn June 14, 2004, as a result of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) event at Palo Verde NuclearGenerating Station, electrical power was lost to the TSC.  The TSC diesel generator started asdesigned, but subsequently tripped due to high engine temperature.  During troubleshooting, itwas determined that the engine operating switch was in idle.  With the switch in idle, the dieselgenerator started on loss of electrical power to the TSC, but did not come up to proper voltage
 
===TSC Emergency Diesel Generator Switch Misalignment===
On June 14, 2004, as a result of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) event at Palo Verde Nuclear
 
Generating Station, electrical power was lost to the TSC.  The TSC diesel generator started as
 
designed, but subsequently tripped due to high engine temperature.  During troubleshooting, it
 
was determined that the engine operating switch was in idle.  With the switch in idle, the diesel
 
generator started on loss of electrical power to the TSC, but did not come up to proper voltage


and frequency and did not reenergize the TSC electrical distribution panel.  As a result, the
and frequency and did not reenergize the TSC electrical distribution panel.  As a result, the


engine radiator cooling fan did not start; therefore, the engine overheated and tripped on hightemperature. The licensee determined that the engine operating switch was apparently left in the idle positionfollowing post-maintenance testing of the engine-starting system performed on June 8, 2004. After corrective maintenance was performed on one battery terminal and connector, the team
engine radiator cooling fan did not start; therefore, the engine overheated and tripped on high
 
temperature.
 
The licensee determined that the engine operating switch was apparently left in the idle position
 
following post-maintenance testing of the engine-starting system performed on June 8, 2004.
 
After corrective maintenance was performed on one battery terminal and connector, the team
 
leader allowed the electricians to test the engine starting system without a working copy of the


leader allowed the electricians to test the engine starting system without a working copy of thetest procedure in the field, since this test was routinely performed by the electricians.  After the
test procedure in the field, since this test was routinely performed by the electricians.  After the


diesel generator was successfully started, the engine operating switch was moved from run to
diesel generator was successfully started, the engine operating switch was moved from run to


idle to allow the engine to run at a slower speed and cool down before being secured.  A follow- up NRC inspection determined that the failure to have a working copy of the test procedure atthe engine during this post-maintenance testing and failure to use the restoration guidance
idle to allow the engine to run at a slower speed and cool down before being secured.  A follow- up NRC inspection determined that the failure to have a working copy of the test procedure at
 
the engine during this post-maintenance testing and failure to use the restoration guidance


contained in the test procedure contributed directly to the failure to restore the TSC diesel
contained in the test procedure contributed directly to the failure to restore the TSC diesel


generator to its normal standby condition.  The NRC inspection also determined that the dieselgenerator failure contributed to a delay in staffing the TSC because the responding members of
generator to its normal standby condition.  The NRC inspection also determined that the diesel
 
generator failure contributed to a delay in staffing the TSC because the responding members of


the emergency response organization were moved to an alternate TSC.  This issue was
the emergency response organization were moved to an alternate TSC.  This issue was


documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000528/2004012; 05000529/2004012;05000530/2004012.  (ADAMS# ML042020061)Procedural Changes Modifying the Effectiveness of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) On June 25, 2001, the NRC resident inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station observed thelicensee's response to an alert declaration due to a fire affecting the station startup transformer.
documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000528/2004012; 05000529/2004012;
05000530/2004012.  (ADAMS# ML042020061)
Procedural Changes Modifying the Effectiveness of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)  
On June 25, 2001, the NRC resident inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station observed the
 
licensees response to an alert declaration due to a fire affecting the station startup transformer.
 
During the event, the inspector noted that the EOF had no alternating current (AC) power.  The


During the event, the inspector noted that the EOF had no alternating current (AC) power.  Thenormal power supply to the EOF was deenergized when the startup transformer isolated
normal power supply to the EOF was deenergized when the startup transformer isolated


following an electrical component failure.  As a result, the EOF had limited communication
following an electrical component failure.  As a result, the EOF had limited communication


abilities and emergency battery powered lighting. Although a back-up power supply existed for the EOF, it was only allowed to supply power tonecessary equipment when the plant was operating in Mode 4, cold shutdown or Mode 5,refueling.  In operating Modes 1, 2, and 3, power operations, startup, and hot shutdown,respectfully, the back-up power supply was allowed to power only communication equipment
abilities and emergency battery powered lighting.
 
Although a back-up power supply existed for the EOF, it was only allowed to supply power to
 
necessary equipment when the plant was operating in Mode 4, cold shutdown or Mode 5, refueling.  In operating Modes 1, 2, and 3, power operations, startup, and hot shutdown, respectfully, the back-up power supply was allowed to power only communication equipment
 
due to electrical loading restrictions on the switchgear.  The NRC resident inspector determined
 
that this restriction significantly compromised the ability of the emergency operations facility to
 
adequately function following a loss of normal power in Modes 1, 2, and 3. In 1986, the licensee performed a design change to increase the reliability of the EOF and


due to electrical loading restrictions on the switchgear.  The NRC resident inspector determinedthat this restriction significantly compromised the ability of the emergency operations facility toadequately function following a loss of normal power in Modes 1, 2, and 3. In 1986, the licensee performed a design change to increase the reliability of the EOF andprovide a back-up source of power during a loss of offsite power event.  This design change
provide a back-up source of power during a loss of offsite power event.  This design change


originally placed no restrictions on using the back-up power supply to the EOF for any operating
originally placed no restrictions on using the back-up power supply to the EOF for any operating


mode.  On September 14, 1991, the licensee revi
mode.  On September 14, 1991, the licensee revised a system operating procedure which
 
restricted the back-up power source to supply only the emergency operations facility
 
communication system when operating in Modes 1, 2, and 3, due to power limitations on the
 
electrical switchgear.  This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 50-298/01-09.
 
(ADAMS# ML043070372)
 
===Failure to Maintain the TSC Batteries===
On December 11, 2003, the NRC completed an inspection at the Indian Point Nuclear
 
Generating Station, Unit 2.  While reviewing condition reports, the inspection team noted that, during the quarterly surveillance tests performed on October 21, 2003, one cell in each of the
 
two TSC battery banks did not meet the acceptance criteria specified in the test procedures.
 
Although the cells were marginally out of specification, the team determined that the licensee
 
did not take prompt corrective actions either to return the two cells to within specifications or to
 
evaluate the impact of the out of specification conditions on the functionality of the battery
 
banks.  Although the TSC battery banks performed as designed during the northeastern grid


sed a system operating procedure whichrestricted the back-up power source to supply only the emergency operations facilitycommunication system when operating in Modes 1, 2, and 3, due to power limitations on theelectrical switchgear.  This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 50-298/01-09. (ADAMS# ML043070372) Failure to Maintain the TSC Batteries
blackout on August 14, 2003 (August 14 event), the team determined that the degraded cells


On December 11, 2003, the NRC completed an inspection at the Indian Point NuclearGenerating Station, Unit 2.  While reviewing condition reports, the inspection team noted that,during the quarterly surveillance tests performed on October 21, 2003, one cell in each of thetwo TSC battery banks did not meet the acceptance criteria specified in the test procedures.
had the potential to adversely affect the facilities and equipment required to support emergency


Although the cells were marginally out of specification, the team determined that the licenseedid not take prompt corrective actions either to return the two cells to within specifications or to
response.  This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2004003.


evaluate the impact of the out of specification conditions on the functionality of the batterybanks. Although the TSC battery banks performed as designed during the northeastern grid
(ADAMS# ML040360248)  


blackout on August 14, 2003 (August 14 event), the team determined that the degraded cellshad the potential to adversely affect the facilities and equipment required to support emergencyresponse.  This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2004003. (ADAMS# ML040360248)  Miscellaneous Failures During the August 14 Event
===Miscellaneous Failures During the August 14 Event===
During the August 14 event, the TSC back-up diesel generator at Indian Point Unit 2 failed to


During the August 14 event, the TSC back-up diesel generator at Indian Point Unit 2 failed toautomatically start and subsequent operator actions to manually start and load the diesel failed.
automatically start and subsequent operator actions to manually start and load the diesel failed.


The Unit 2 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to electrical loading in excess of its
The Unit 2 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to electrical loading in excess of its
Line 90: Line 187:
potential for the TSC back-up diesel generator to be overloaded.  Also, a review by the licensee
potential for the TSC back-up diesel generator to be overloaded.  Also, a review by the licensee


of the electrical power distribution drawings showed a potential existed for the TSC back-updiesel generator to be overloaded under some conditions.  Long-term corrective actions for this
of the electrical power distribution drawings showed a potential existed for the TSC back-up
 
diesel generator to be overloaded under some conditions.  Long-term corrective actions for this
 
diesel were postponed.  The Unit 2 TSC and Operational Support Center remained without a
 
back-up AC electrical power supply until September 15, 2003, when a temporary alteration was
 
installed and satisfactorily tested.


diesel were postponed.  The Unit 2 TSC and Operational Support Center remained without aback-up AC electrical power supply until September 15, 2003, when a temporary alteration was
Additionally during the August 14 event, the Indian Point Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator


installed and satisfactorily tested. Additionally during the August 14 event, the Indian Point Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generatorstarted and then tripped while being loaded and was unavailable for the duration of the
started and then tripped while being loaded and was unavailable for the duration of the


blackout.  The Unit 3 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to a malfunctioning overspeed
blackout.  The Unit 3 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to a malfunctioning overspeed


controller.  The diesel generator was repaired and restored to service on September 16, 2003. During a refueling outage, on April 18, 2003, the Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator wastested under simulated blackout conditions and tripped while being loaded. Subsequently, a licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed tripmodule.  Seven hours later, the Unit 3 TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and
controller.  The diesel generator was repaired and restored to service on September 16, 2003.
 
During a refueling outage, on April 18, 2003, the Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator was
 
tested under simulated blackout conditions and tripped while being loaded. Subsequently, a licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed trip
 
module.  Seven hours later, the Unit 3 TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and


declared operable.  The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module
declared operable.  The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module


was postponed by the licensee's maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based upon a determination that the diesel problem was "not an operability concern."During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC teamidentified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensurethe continued functionality of the numerous Un-Interruptible Power Supplies (UPSs) in the EOFwhich provide back-up power to emergency response equipment.  By design, there is no
was postponed by the licensees maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based upon a determination that the diesel problem was not an operability concern.
 
During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC team
 
identified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensure
 
the continued functionality of the numerous Un-Interruptible Power Supplies (UPSs) in the EOF
 
which provide back-up power to emergency response equipment.  By design, there is no


electrical back-up power supply to the EOF.  Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which
electrical back-up power supply to the EOF.  Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which
Line 108: Line 227:
provide short-term battery back-up power to dedicated ERF communications and data
provide short-term battery back-up power to dedicated ERF communications and data


transmission systems.  During t
transmission systems.  During the August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a
 
fraction of their design capacity.
 
The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs were
 
documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010.  (ADAMS#
ML033570386)
CONCLUSION


he August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only afraction of their design capacity.The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs weredocumented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010.  (ADAMS#ML033570386)CONCLUSION
Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability of


Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability ofERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency.  The occurrence of these
ERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency.  The occurrence of these


types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and
types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and


maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.
maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and
 
reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  Please direct anyquestions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate
This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  Please direct any
 
questions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers.


Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers./RA/Patrick L. Hiland, Chief
/RA/


===Reactor Operations Branch===
===Patrick L. Hiland, Chief===
Division of Inspection Program Management
Reactor Operations Branch


===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation===
===Division of Inspection Program Management===
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Jason L. Flemming(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.govAttachment:  List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed tripmodule.  Seven hours later, the TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and declared
 
===Jason L. Flemming===
(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.gov
 
Attachment:  List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed trip
 
module.  Seven hours later, the TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and declared


operable.  The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module was
operable.  The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module was


postponed by the licensee's maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based
postponed by the licensees maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based
 
upon a determination that the diesel problem was not an operability concern.


upon a determination that the diesel problem was "not an operability concern."Failure of EOF Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPSs)
Failure of EOF Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPSs)
During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC teamidentified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensurethe continued functionality of the numerous UPSs in the EOF which provide back-up power to
During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC team
 
identified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensure
 
the continued functionality of the numerous UPSs in the EOF which provide back-up power to


emergency response equipment.  By design, there is no electrical back-up power supply to the
emergency response equipment.  By design, there is no electrical back-up power supply to the
Line 142: Line 288:
EOF.  Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which provide short-term battery back-up power
EOF.  Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which provide short-term battery back-up power


to dedicated ERF communications and data transmission systems.  During the August 14event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a fraction of their design capacity.The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs weredocumented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010.  (ADAMS#ML033570386)CONCLUSION
to dedicated ERF communications and data transmission systems.  During the August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a fraction of their design capacity.
 
The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs were
 
documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010.  (ADAMS#
ML033570386)
CONCLUSION
 
Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability of


Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability ofERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency.  The occurrence of these
ERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency.  The occurrence of these


types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and
types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and


maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.
maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and
 
reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  Please direct anyquestions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate
This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  Please direct any
 
questions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers.


Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers./RA/Patrick L. Hiland, Chief
/RA/


===Reactor Operations Branch===
===Patrick L. Hiland, Chief===
Division of Inspection Program Management
Reactor Operations Branch


===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation===
===Division of Inspection Program Management===
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Jason L. Flemming(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.govAttachment:  List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesDISTRIBUTION:ADAMSIN FileADAMS ACCESSION #: ML042730010
DOCUMENT NAME:  E:\Filenet\ML042730010.wpdOFFICEDPR:EPD:NSIRTECH EDITOREMCBEPD:DPR:NSIRD:EPD:DPR:NSIRNAMEJLFlemmingPKleeneSLRosenbergEWWeissNLMamishDATE10/06/200409/23/200410/17/200410/08/200410/12/2004OFFICEDPR:NSIROES:IROB:DIPMA:SC:OES:IROB:DIPMA:C:IROB:DIPMNAMEEJLeedsCDPetroneACMcMurtrayPLHiland


DATE10/14/200410/18/200411/03/200411/04/2004     /       /2004OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
===Jason L. Flemming===
(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.gov
 
Attachment:  List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
 
DISTRIBUTION:
ADAMS
 
IN File
 
ADAMS ACCESSION #: ML042730010
DOCUMENT NAME:  E:\\Filenet\\ML042730010.wpd
 
OFFICE
 
DPR:EPD:NSIR
 
TECH EDITOR
 
EMCB
 
EPD:DPR:NSIR
 
D:EPD:DPR:NSIR
 
NAME
 
JLFlemming
 
PKleene
 
SLRosenberg
 
EWWeiss
 
NLMamish
 
DATE
 
10/06/2004
09/23/2004
10/17/2004
10/08/2004
10/12/2004 OFFICE
 
DPR:NSIR
 
OES:IROB:DIPM
 
A:SC:OES:IROB:DIPM
 
A:C:IROB:DIPM
 
NAME
 
EJLeeds


______________________________________________________________________________________OL = Operating License
CDPetrone


CP = Construction PermitAttachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICES
ACMcMurtray
 
PLHiland
 
DATE
 
10/14/2004
10/18/2004
11/03/2004
11/04/2004
    /      /2004
 
===OFFICIAL RECORD COPY===
 
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License
 
CP = Construction Permit
 
===Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED===
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
 
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Information
 
Date of
 
Notice No.
 
Subject
 
Issuance
 
Issued to


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
InformationDate of
2004-18 Recent Safety-related Event at
 
Panoramic Wet-source- storage Irradiator


===Notice No.        SubjectIssuanceIssued to===
10/26/2004


_____________________________________________________________________________________2004-18Recent Safety-related Event atPanoramic Wet-source- storage Irradiator10/26/2004All licensees authorized topossess and use sealed sources
===All licensees authorized to===
possess and use sealed sources


in panoramic wet-source-storage
in panoramic wet-source-storage


irradiators, and irradiator vendors.2004-17Loose Part Detection and Computerized Eddy Current
irradiators, and irradiator vendors.
 
2004-17 Loose Part Detection and


===Data Analysis in Steam===
===Computerized Eddy Current===
Generators08/25/2004All holders of operating licensesfor pressurized-water reactors
Data Analysis in Steam
 
Generators
 
08/25/2004
 
===All holders of operating licenses===
for pressurized-water reactors


(PWRs), except those who have
(PWRs), except those who have
Line 192: Line 451:
been permanently removed from
been permanently removed from


the reactor.2004-16Tube Leakage Due to aFabrication Flaw in a
the reactor.
 
2004-16
 
===Tube Leakage Due to a===
Fabrication Flaw in a
 
===Replacement Steam Generator===
08/03/2004


Replacement Steam Generator08/03/2004All holders of operating licensesfor pressurized-water reactors
===All holders of operating licenses===
for pressurized-water reactors


(PWRs), except those who have
(PWRs), except those who have
Line 204: Line 472:
been permanently removed from
been permanently removed from


the reactor.2004-15Dual-Unit Scram at PeachBottom Units 2 and 307/22/2004All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactors except
the reactor.
 
2004-15 Dual-Unit Scram at Peach
 
===Bottom Units 2 and 3===
07/22/2004
 
===All holders of operating licenses===
for nuclear power reactors except


those who have permanently
those who have permanently
Line 214: Line 490:
permanently removed from the
permanently removed from the


reactor vessel.2004-14Use of less than OptimalBounding Assumptions in
reactor vessel.
 
2004-14
 
===Use of less than Optimal===
Bounding Assumptions in


===Criticality Safety Analysis at===
===Criticality Safety Analysis at===
Fuel Cycle Facilities07/19/2004All licensees authorized topossess a critical mass of special
Fuel Cycle Facilities
 
07/19/2004
 
===All licensees authorized to===
possess a critical mass of special
 
nuclear material.
 
Note:
NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are
 
issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following


nuclear material.Note: NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they areissued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the followingcommand in the message portion:subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname}}
command in the message portion:
subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 01:01, 16 January 2025

Problems Associated with Back-up Power Supplies to Emergency Response Facilities and Equipment
ML042730010
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/04/2004
From: Hiland P
NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB
To:
Fleming J NSIR/DPR/EPD 415-1587
References
TAC MC4467 IN-04-019
Download: ML042730010 (6)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555

November 4, 2004 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-19:

PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH BACK-UP

POWER SUPPLIES TO EMERGENCY

RESPONSE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT

ADDRESSEES

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have

permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed

from the reactor vessel.

PURPOSE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert

addressees to problems with back-up power supplies for emergency response facilities (ERFs)

and equipment. Emergency response equipment and ERFs need to be functional in the event

of an emergency. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to

their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no

specific action or written response is required.

BACKGROUND

The ERF and emergency response equipment requirements must meet the following standard

of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Paragraph 47(b)(8):

Adequate emergency facilities and equipment to support the emergency response are

provided and maintained.

Requirements are also found in Section IV.E Emergency Facilities and Equipment of

Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50:

Adequate provisions shall be made and described for emergency facilities and

equipment, including:

A licensee onsite technical support center (TSC) and a licensee near-site emergency

operations facility from which effective direction can be given and effective control can

be exercised during an emergency.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

AND

DISCUSSION

TSC Emergency Diesel Generator Switch Misalignment

On June 14, 2004, as a result of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) event at Palo Verde Nuclear

Generating Station, electrical power was lost to the TSC. The TSC diesel generator started as

designed, but subsequently tripped due to high engine temperature. During troubleshooting, it

was determined that the engine operating switch was in idle. With the switch in idle, the diesel

generator started on loss of electrical power to the TSC, but did not come up to proper voltage

and frequency and did not reenergize the TSC electrical distribution panel. As a result, the

engine radiator cooling fan did not start; therefore, the engine overheated and tripped on high

temperature.

The licensee determined that the engine operating switch was apparently left in the idle position

following post-maintenance testing of the engine-starting system performed on June 8, 2004.

After corrective maintenance was performed on one battery terminal and connector, the team

leader allowed the electricians to test the engine starting system without a working copy of the

test procedure in the field, since this test was routinely performed by the electricians. After the

diesel generator was successfully started, the engine operating switch was moved from run to

idle to allow the engine to run at a slower speed and cool down before being secured. A follow- up NRC inspection determined that the failure to have a working copy of the test procedure at

the engine during this post-maintenance testing and failure to use the restoration guidance

contained in the test procedure contributed directly to the failure to restore the TSC diesel

generator to its normal standby condition. The NRC inspection also determined that the diesel

generator failure contributed to a delay in staffing the TSC because the responding members of

the emergency response organization were moved to an alternate TSC. This issue was

documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000528/2004012; 05000529/2004012;

05000530/2004012. (ADAMS# ML042020061)

Procedural Changes Modifying the Effectiveness of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)

On June 25, 2001, the NRC resident inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station observed the

licensees response to an alert declaration due to a fire affecting the station startup transformer.

During the event, the inspector noted that the EOF had no alternating current (AC) power. The

normal power supply to the EOF was deenergized when the startup transformer isolated

following an electrical component failure. As a result, the EOF had limited communication

abilities and emergency battery powered lighting.

Although a back-up power supply existed for the EOF, it was only allowed to supply power to

necessary equipment when the plant was operating in Mode 4, cold shutdown or Mode 5, refueling. In operating Modes 1, 2, and 3, power operations, startup, and hot shutdown, respectfully, the back-up power supply was allowed to power only communication equipment

due to electrical loading restrictions on the switchgear. The NRC resident inspector determined

that this restriction significantly compromised the ability of the emergency operations facility to

adequately function following a loss of normal power in Modes 1, 2, and 3. In 1986, the licensee performed a design change to increase the reliability of the EOF and

provide a back-up source of power during a loss of offsite power event. This design change

originally placed no restrictions on using the back-up power supply to the EOF for any operating

mode. On September 14, 1991, the licensee revised a system operating procedure which

restricted the back-up power source to supply only the emergency operations facility

communication system when operating in Modes 1, 2, and 3, due to power limitations on the

electrical switchgear. This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 50-298/01-09.

(ADAMS# ML043070372)

Failure to Maintain the TSC Batteries

On December 11, 2003, the NRC completed an inspection at the Indian Point Nuclear

Generating Station, Unit 2. While reviewing condition reports, the inspection team noted that, during the quarterly surveillance tests performed on October 21, 2003, one cell in each of the

two TSC battery banks did not meet the acceptance criteria specified in the test procedures.

Although the cells were marginally out of specification, the team determined that the licensee

did not take prompt corrective actions either to return the two cells to within specifications or to

evaluate the impact of the out of specification conditions on the functionality of the battery

banks. Although the TSC battery banks performed as designed during the northeastern grid

blackout on August 14, 2003 (August 14 event), the team determined that the degraded cells

had the potential to adversely affect the facilities and equipment required to support emergency

response. This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2004003.

(ADAMS# ML040360248)

Miscellaneous Failures During the August 14 Event

During the August 14 event, the TSC back-up diesel generator at Indian Point Unit 2 failed to

automatically start and subsequent operator actions to manually start and load the diesel failed.

The Unit 2 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to electrical loading in excess of its

design capacity. This condition was initially identified in February 2000 and was not resolved in

a timely manner. Observations by the licensee during emergency planning training revealed a

potential for the TSC back-up diesel generator to be overloaded. Also, a review by the licensee

of the electrical power distribution drawings showed a potential existed for the TSC back-up

diesel generator to be overloaded under some conditions. Long-term corrective actions for this

diesel were postponed. The Unit 2 TSC and Operational Support Center remained without a

back-up AC electrical power supply until September 15, 2003, when a temporary alteration was

installed and satisfactorily tested.

Additionally during the August 14 event, the Indian Point Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator

started and then tripped while being loaded and was unavailable for the duration of the

blackout. The Unit 3 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to a malfunctioning overspeed

controller. The diesel generator was repaired and restored to service on September 16, 2003.

During a refueling outage, on April 18, 2003, the Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator was

tested under simulated blackout conditions and tripped while being loaded. Subsequently, a licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed trip

module. Seven hours later, the Unit 3 TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and

declared operable. The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module

was postponed by the licensees maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based upon a determination that the diesel problem was not an operability concern.

During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC team

identified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensure

the continued functionality of the numerous Un-Interruptible Power Supplies (UPSs) in the EOF

which provide back-up power to emergency response equipment. By design, there is no

electrical back-up power supply to the EOF. Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which

provide short-term battery back-up power to dedicated ERF communications and data

transmission systems. During the August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a

fraction of their design capacity.

The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs were

documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010. (ADAMS#

ML033570386)

CONCLUSION

Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability of

ERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency. The occurrence of these

types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and

maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and

reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.

CONTACT

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any

questions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers.

/RA/

Patrick L. Hiland, Chief

Reactor Operations Branch

Division of Inspection Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Jason L. Flemming

(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed trip

module. Seven hours later, the TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and declared

operable. The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module was

postponed by the licensees maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based

upon a determination that the diesel problem was not an operability concern.

Failure of EOF Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPSs)

During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC team

identified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensure

the continued functionality of the numerous UPSs in the EOF which provide back-up power to

emergency response equipment. By design, there is no electrical back-up power supply to the

EOF. Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which provide short-term battery back-up power

to dedicated ERF communications and data transmission systems. During the August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a fraction of their design capacity.

The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs were

documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010. (ADAMS#

ML033570386)

CONCLUSION

Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability of

ERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency. The occurrence of these

types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and

maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and

reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.

CONTACT

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any

questions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers.

/RA/

Patrick L. Hiland, Chief

Reactor Operations Branch

Division of Inspection Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Jason L. Flemming

(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

DISTRIBUTION:

ADAMS

IN File

ADAMS ACCESSION #: ML042730010

DOCUMENT NAME: E:\\Filenet\\ML042730010.wpd

OFFICE

DPR:EPD:NSIR

TECH EDITOR

EMCB

EPD:DPR:NSIR

D:EPD:DPR:NSIR

NAME

JLFlemming

PKleene

SLRosenberg

EWWeiss

NLMamish

DATE

10/06/2004

09/23/2004

10/17/2004

10/08/2004

10/12/2004 OFFICE

DPR:NSIR

OES:IROB:DIPM

A:SC:OES:IROB:DIPM

A:C:IROB:DIPM

NAME

EJLeeds

CDPetrone

ACMcMurtray

PLHiland

DATE

10/14/2004

10/18/2004

11/03/2004

11/04/2004

/ /2004

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit

Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information

Date of

Notice No.

Subject

Issuance

Issued to

_____________________________________________________________________________________

2004-18 Recent Safety-related Event at

Panoramic Wet-source- storage Irradiator

10/26/2004

All licensees authorized to

possess and use sealed sources

in panoramic wet-source-storage

irradiators, and irradiator vendors.

2004-17 Loose Part Detection and

Computerized Eddy Current

Data Analysis in Steam

Generators

08/25/2004

All holders of operating licenses

for pressurized-water reactors

(PWRs), except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor.

2004-16

Tube Leakage Due to a

Fabrication Flaw in a

Replacement Steam Generator

08/03/2004

All holders of operating licenses

for pressurized-water reactors

(PWRs), except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor.

2004-15 Dual-Unit Scram at Peach

Bottom Units 2 and 3

07/22/2004

All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors except

those who have permanently

ceased operation and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel.

2004-14

Use of less than Optimal

Bounding Assumptions in

Criticality Safety Analysis at

Fuel Cycle Facilities

07/19/2004

All licensees authorized to

possess a critical mass of special

nuclear material.

Note:

NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are

issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:

To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following

command in the message portion:

subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname