ML19039A253: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NRC NDAA WIR Monitoring Successes at U.S. DOE Savannah River Site 02-12- | {{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NRC NDAA WIR Monitoring Successes at U.S. | ||
*NRC Monitoring in Coordination with South Carolina as Required by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA) | DOE Savannah River Site 02-12-2019 Bo Pham, Acting Director, DUWP Christepher McKenney, Acting Deputy Director, DUWP Harry Felsher, DUWP/LLWPB | ||
*NRC Monitoring at | |||
*NRC Monitoring at F | NRC Monitoring at Savannah River Site (SRS) | ||
-Tank Farm (FTF) since 2012*NRC Monitoring at H | * NRC Monitoring in Coordination with South Carolina as Required by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA) | ||
-Tank Farm (HTF) since 2015 2 NRC Monitoring Activities at SRS | * NRC Monitoring at Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF) since 2007 | ||
*NRC Issues Plan to Monitor DOE | * NRC Monitoring at F-Tank Farm (FTF) since 2012 | ||
*Current NRC Monitoring Plans include Monitoring Areas and Monitoring Factors | * NRC Monitoring at H-Tank Farm (HTF) since 2015 2 | ||
*Monitoring Activities include: | |||
-onsite observation visits-technical reviews | NRC Monitoring Activities at SRS | ||
-data reviews 3 Overall Successes for NRC Monitoring at SRS*NRC/DOE Management Meetings | * NRC Issues Plan to Monitor DOE | ||
*Separate Monthly Teleconference Calls: | * Current NRC Monitoring Plans include Monitoring Areas and Monitoring Factors | ||
-NRC/DOE-NRC/SCDHEC/EPA Region 4 | * Monitoring Activities include: | ||
*Updated Monitoring Plans*NRC Letters Supplementing a Monitoring Plan | - onsite observation visits | ||
*Coordination of NRC/DOE Research Activities | - technical reviews | ||
*Making Progress on Closure of Monitoring Factors 4 Monitoring at SDF*Initial SDF Monitoring Plan Issued in 2007 | - data reviews 3 | ||
*Revision 1 SDF Monitoring Plan Issued in 2013 | |||
*20 SDF OOVs since 2007 | Overall Successes for NRC Monitoring at SRS | ||
*16 SDF TRRs issued, including: | * NRC/DOE Management Meetings | ||
-hydraulic performance of saltstone-technetium waste release | * Separate Monthly Teleconference Calls: | ||
-engineered cover performance 5 | - NRC/DOE | ||
Successes for Monitoring at SDF*Prioritization of Monitoring Factors Informed by Risk and Uncertainty | - NRC/SCDHEC/EPA Region 4 | ||
*DOE Research Aligned with NRC High | * Updated Monitoring Plans | ||
-Priority Monitoring Factors | * NRC Letters Supplementing a Monitoring Plan | ||
- | * Coordination of NRC/DOE Research Activities | ||
*NRC Opened Two New Monitoring Factors in FY 2018 6 | * Making Progress on Closure of Monitoring Factors 4 | ||
Monitoring at SDF | |||
* Initial SDF Monitoring Plan Issued in 2007 | |||
+/- - 4.01 - Waste Form Matrix Degradation | * Revision 1 SDF Monitoring Plan Issued in 2013 | ||
+/- - 5.01 - Radionuclide Release from Field-Emplaced | * 20 SDF OOVs since 2007 | ||
+/- - 6.01 - Certain Risk-Significant | * 16 SDF TRRs issued, including: | ||
+/- - 4.02 - Waste Form Macroscopic Fracturing | - hydraulic performance of saltstone | ||
+/- - 5.02 - Chemical Reduction of Tc by Saltstone | - technetium waste release | ||
+/- - 6.02 - Tc Sorption in Disposal Structure Concrete +/- | - engineered cover performance 5 | ||
+/- | |||
+/- | Successes for Monitoring at SDF | ||
-Significant | * Prioritization of Monitoring Factors Informed by Risk and Uncertainty | ||
* DOE Research Aligned with NRC High-Priority Monitoring Factors | |||
- saltstone cores | |||
§ - 9.01 - Settlement Due to Increased | - simulated saltstone | ||
* NRC Closed or Lowered in Priority Seven Monitoring Factors in Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 | |||
* NRC Opened Two New Monitoring Factors in FY 2018 6 | |||
§ - 9.02 - Settlement | |||
7 MA 1 Inventory MA 2 Infiltration and Erosion Control MA 3 Waste Form Hydraulic Performance MA 4 Waste Form Physical Degradation MA 5 Waste Form Chemical Degradation MA 6 Disposal Structure Performance | |||
-Up in Biosphere Soil | - 1.01 - | ||
Inventory in Disposal Structures § | |||
- 2.01 - | |||
Hydraulic Performance of Closure Cap | |||
- 3.01 - | |||
Hydraulic Conductivity of Field-Emplaced Saltstone +/- | |||
- 4.01 - | |||
Waste Form Matrix Degradation +/- | |||
- 5.01 - | |||
Radionuclide Release from Field-Emplaced Saltstone +/- | |||
- 6.01 - | |||
Certain Risk-Significant Kd Values in Disposal Structure Concrete | |||
- 1.02 - | |||
Methods Used to Assess Inventory | |||
- 2.02 - | |||
Erosion Control of the SDF Engineered Surface Cover and Adjacent Area. | |||
- 3.02 - | |||
Variability of Field-Emplaced Saltstone +/- | |||
- 4.02 - | |||
Waste Form Macroscopic Fracturing +/- | |||
- 5.02 - | |||
Chemical Reduction of Tc by Saltstone +/- | |||
- 6.02 - | |||
Tc Sorption in Disposal Structure Concrete +/- | |||
- 3.03 - | |||
Applicability of Laboratory Data to Field-Emplaced Saltstone +/- | |||
- 5.03 - | |||
Reducing Capacity of Saltstone | |||
- 6.03 - | |||
Performance of Disposal Structure Roofs and HDPE/GCL Layers | |||
- 3.04 - | |||
Effect of Curing Temperature on Saltstone Hydraulic Properties +/- | |||
- 5.04 - | |||
Certain Risk-Significant Kd Values for Saltstone | |||
- 6.04 - | |||
Disposal Structure Concrete Fracturing | |||
- 5.05 - | |||
Potential for Short-Term Rinse-Release from Saltstone | |||
- 6.05 - | |||
Integrity of Non-cementitious Materials | |||
§ Periodic Monitoring Factors (i.e., MFs related to data that NRC staff expects to review on a periodic basis) | |||
Low Priority Medium Priority | |||
+/- High Priority Closed Current Status and Prioritization of SDF Monitoring Factors MA 7 Subsurface Transport MA 8 Environmental Monitoring MA 9 Site Stability MA 10 Performance Assessment Model Revisions MA 11 Radiation Protection Program | |||
- 7.01 - | |||
Certain Risk-Significant Kd Values in Site Sand and Clay | |||
- 8.01 - | |||
Leak Detection § | |||
- 9.01 - | |||
Settlement Due to Increased Overburden | |||
- 10.01 - | |||
Implementation of Conceptual Models +/- | |||
- 11.01 - | |||
Dose to Individuals During Operations | |||
- 8.02 - | |||
Groundwater Monitoring § | |||
- 9.02 - | |||
Settlement Due to Dissolution of Calcareous Sediment | |||
- 10.02 - | |||
Defensibility of Conceptual Models +/- | |||
- 11.02 - | |||
Air Monitorin | |||
- 10.03 - | |||
Diffusivity in Degraded Saltstone | |||
- 8.03 - | |||
Identification and Monitoring of Groundwater Plumes in the Z Area +/- | |||
- 10.04 - | |||
Kd Values for Saltstone | |||
- 10.05 - | |||
Moisture Characteristic Curves | |||
- 10.06 - | |||
Kd Values for Disposal Structure Concrete | |||
- 10.07 - | |||
Calculation of Build-Up in Biosphere Soil | |||
- 10.08 - | |||
Consumption Factors and Uncertainty Distributions for Transfer Factors | |||
- 10.09 - | |||
Kd Values for SRS Soil | |||
- 10.10 - | |||
Far-Field Model Calibration | |||
- 10.11 - | |||
Far-Field Model Source Loading Approach | |||
- 10.12 - | |||
Far-Field Model Dispersion | |||
- 10.13 - | |||
Impact of Calcareous Zones on Contaminant Flow and Transport | |||
- 10.14 - | |||
Scenario Development and Defensibility | |||
§ Periodic Monitoring Factors (i.e., MFs related to data that NRC staff expects to review on a periodic basis) | |||
Low Priority | |||
NRC/DOE Joint Plan for SDF | NRC/DOE Joint Plan for SDF | ||
*Needed Information Based on NRC High | ==Purpose:== | ||
-Priority Monitoring Factors | Identify Information Needed to Support NRC Finding of Reasonable Assurance that DOE Demonstrated Meeting Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations Part 61 Subpart C Performance Objectives at SDF | ||
*DOE Establishes the Schedule of Providing Information to NRC*Joint Plan Issued 10/23/2018 | * Needed Information Based on NRC High-Priority Monitoring Factors | ||
-ML18235A068 8 | * DOE Establishes the Schedule of Providing Information to NRC | ||
* Joint Plan Issued 10/23/2018 - ML18235A068 8 | |||
Monitoring at Tank Farms (TFs) | Monitoring at Tank Farms (TFs) | ||
*FTF Monitoring Plan Issued in January 2013 | * FTF Monitoring Plan Issued in January 2013 | ||
*TFs Monitoring Plan Issued in October 2015 to Include HTF | * TFs Monitoring Plan Issued in October 2015 to Include HTF | ||
*Eight Onsite Observation Visits Since 2012 | * Eight Onsite Observation Visits Since 2012 | ||
*15 TFs TRRs issued, including: | * 15 TFs TRRs issued, including: | ||
-tank grouting | - tank grouting | ||
-waste release | - waste release | ||
-final inventory and risk estimates after tank closure 9 | - final inventory and risk estimates after tank closure 9 | ||
Current Prioritization of TFs Monitoring Factors | Current Prioritization of TFs Monitoring Factors | ||
*NRC Performed Independent Analysis to Risk | * NRC Performed Independent Analysis to Risk-Inform TFs Monitoring Plan and Prioritize Monitoring Factors 10 | ||
-Inform TFs Monitoring Plan and Prioritize Monitoring Factors 10 NRC/DOE Successes at TFs | |||
*Highest Priority Monitoring Factor 2.1 (Solubility | NRC/DOE Successes at TFs | ||
-Limiting Phases/Limits and Validation) was Addressed by DOE in Recent | * Highest Priority Monitoring Factor 2.1 (Solubility-Limiting Phases/Limits and Validation) was Addressed by DOE in Recent Research Efforts 11 | ||
-level waste samples completed in 2016-NRC staff completed Waste Release Testing Technical Review Report (TRR) in 2018 Path Forward for Monitoring at TFs | - Results of several years of waste release testing of Tank 18 high-level waste samples completed in 2016 | ||
*Results of DOE Tank 18 Waste Release Experiments Indicated Risk | - NRC staff completed Waste Release Testing Technical Review Report (TRR) in 2018 | ||
-Significant Solubilities for Plutonium (Pu) and Higher than Expected Solubility for Other Key Radionuclides | |||
*Next Steps Include: | Path Forward for Monitoring at TFs | ||
-reduction in uncertainty in barriers affecting the timing and magnitude of peak Pu dose including: | * Results of DOE Tank 18 Waste Release Experiments Indicated Risk-Significant Solubilities for Plutonium (Pu) and Higher than Expected Solubility for Other Key Radionuclides | ||
*natural system attenuation (chemical barrier delaying timing and magnitude of peak dose) | * Next Steps Include: | ||
*tank/grout performance (hydraulic and chemical barrier to release) | - reduction in uncertainty in barriers affecting the timing and magnitude of peak Pu dose including: | ||
*tank vault performance (chemical barrier to release) 12 CNWRA Research to Support NRC NDAA WIR Monitoring at SRS | * natural system attenuation (chemical barrier delaying timing and magnitude of peak dose) | ||
*More Recent Activities Included:-tank grout groundwater conditioning experiments | * tank/grout performance (hydraulic and chemical barrier to release) | ||
-saltstone/technetium release experiments 13 List of Recent CNWRA Research Reports for NRC on SDF and TFs | * tank vault performance (chemical barrier to release) 12 | ||
* | |||
-Status Report, | CNWRA Research to Support NRC NDAA WIR Monitoring at SRS | ||
* | * More Recent Activities Included: | ||
-Status Report, | - tank grout groundwater conditioning experiments | ||
* | - saltstone/technetium release experiments 13 | ||
* | |||
-Status Report, | List of Recent CNWRA Research Reports for NRC on SDF and TFs | ||
*Two more reports expected soon 14 Future Activities at SRS | * Saltstone Leaching Experiments-Status Report, September 2015. ML15302A086 | ||
*DOE Plans to Issue Revised SDF Performance Assessment (PA) in 2020 | * Tank Grout Water Conditioning Tests-Status Report, September 2015. ML15302A081 | ||
*NRC Will Review Revised SDF PA and Issue Revised SDF Technical Evaluation Report | * Fiscal Year 2016 Tank Grout Water Conditioning Tests-Status Report, January 2017. ML18285A834 | ||
*NRC Will Issue Revised SDF Monitoring Plan | * Fiscal Year 2016 Saltstone Leaching Experiment-Status Report, May 2017. ML17221A038 | ||
*NRC Currently Reviewing DOE Revised General Separations Area Groundwater Model for SDF and TFs 15}} | * Two more reports expected soon 14 | ||
Future Activities at SRS | |||
* DOE Plans to Issue Revised SDF Performance Assessment (PA) in 2020 | |||
* NRC Will Review Revised SDF PA and Issue Revised SDF Technical Evaluation Report | |||
* NRC Will Issue Revised SDF Monitoring Plan | |||
* NRC Currently Reviewing DOE Revised General Separations Area Groundwater Model for SDF and TFs 15}} | |||
Latest revision as of 05:09, 5 January 2025
| ML19039A253 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | PROJ0734 |
| Issue date: | 02/12/2019 |
| From: | Harry Felsher, Chris Mckenney, Bo Pham Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs |
| To: | |
| H FELSHER DUWP | |
| References | |
| Download: ML19039A253 (15) | |
Text
U.S. NRC NDAA WIR Monitoring Successes at U.S.
DOE Savannah River Site 02-12-2019 Bo Pham, Acting Director, DUWP Christepher McKenney, Acting Deputy Director, DUWP Harry Felsher, DUWP/LLWPB
NRC Monitoring at Savannah River Site (SRS)
- NRC Monitoring in Coordination with South Carolina as Required by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA)
- NRC Monitoring at Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF) since 2007
- NRC Monitoring at F-Tank Farm (FTF) since 2012
- NRC Monitoring at H-Tank Farm (HTF) since 2015 2
NRC Monitoring Activities at SRS
- NRC Issues Plan to Monitor DOE
- Current NRC Monitoring Plans include Monitoring Areas and Monitoring Factors
- Monitoring Activities include:
- onsite observation visits
- technical reviews
- data reviews 3
Overall Successes for NRC Monitoring at SRS
- NRC/DOE Management Meetings
- Separate Monthly Teleconference Calls:
- NRC/DOE
- NRC/SCDHEC/EPA Region 4
- Updated Monitoring Plans
- NRC Letters Supplementing a Monitoring Plan
- Coordination of NRC/DOE Research Activities
- Making Progress on Closure of Monitoring Factors 4
Monitoring at SDF
- Initial SDF Monitoring Plan Issued in 2007
- Revision 1 SDF Monitoring Plan Issued in 2013
- 20 SDF OOVs since 2007
- 16 SDF TRRs issued, including:
- hydraulic performance of saltstone
- technetium waste release
- engineered cover performance 5
Successes for Monitoring at SDF
- Prioritization of Monitoring Factors Informed by Risk and Uncertainty
- DOE Research Aligned with NRC High-Priority Monitoring Factors
- saltstone cores
- simulated saltstone
- NRC Closed or Lowered in Priority Seven Monitoring Factors in Fiscal Year (FY) 2018
- NRC Opened Two New Monitoring Factors in FY 2018 6
7 MA 1 Inventory MA 2 Infiltration and Erosion Control MA 3 Waste Form Hydraulic Performance MA 4 Waste Form Physical Degradation MA 5 Waste Form Chemical Degradation MA 6 Disposal Structure Performance
- 1.01 -
Inventory in Disposal Structures §
- 2.01 -
Hydraulic Performance of Closure Cap
- 3.01 -
Hydraulic Conductivity of Field-Emplaced Saltstone +/-
- 4.01 -
Waste Form Matrix Degradation +/-
- 5.01 -
Radionuclide Release from Field-Emplaced Saltstone +/-
- 6.01 -
Certain Risk-Significant Kd Values in Disposal Structure Concrete
- 1.02 -
Methods Used to Assess Inventory
- 2.02 -
Erosion Control of the SDF Engineered Surface Cover and Adjacent Area.
- 3.02 -
Variability of Field-Emplaced Saltstone +/-
- 4.02 -
Waste Form Macroscopic Fracturing +/-
- 5.02 -
Chemical Reduction of Tc by Saltstone +/-
- 6.02 -
Tc Sorption in Disposal Structure Concrete +/-
- 3.03 -
Applicability of Laboratory Data to Field-Emplaced Saltstone +/-
- 5.03 -
Reducing Capacity of Saltstone
- 6.03 -
Performance of Disposal Structure Roofs and HDPE/GCL Layers
- 3.04 -
Effect of Curing Temperature on Saltstone Hydraulic Properties +/-
- 5.04 -
Certain Risk-Significant Kd Values for Saltstone
- 6.04 -
Disposal Structure Concrete Fracturing
- 5.05 -
Potential for Short-Term Rinse-Release from Saltstone
- 6.05 -
Integrity of Non-cementitious Materials
§ Periodic Monitoring Factors (i.e., MFs related to data that NRC staff expects to review on a periodic basis)
Low Priority Medium Priority
+/- High Priority Closed Current Status and Prioritization of SDF Monitoring Factors MA 7 Subsurface Transport MA 8 Environmental Monitoring MA 9 Site Stability MA 10 Performance Assessment Model Revisions MA 11 Radiation Protection Program
- 7.01 -
Certain Risk-Significant Kd Values in Site Sand and Clay
- 8.01 -
Leak Detection §
- 9.01 -
Settlement Due to Increased Overburden
- 10.01 -
Implementation of Conceptual Models +/-
- 11.01 -
Dose to Individuals During Operations
- 8.02 -
Groundwater Monitoring §
- 9.02 -
Settlement Due to Dissolution of Calcareous Sediment
- 10.02 -
Defensibility of Conceptual Models +/-
- 11.02 -
Air Monitorin
- 10.03 -
Diffusivity in Degraded Saltstone
- 8.03 -
Identification and Monitoring of Groundwater Plumes in the Z Area +/-
- 10.04 -
Kd Values for Saltstone
- 10.05 -
Moisture Characteristic Curves
- 10.06 -
Kd Values for Disposal Structure Concrete
- 10.07 -
Calculation of Build-Up in Biosphere Soil
- 10.08 -
Consumption Factors and Uncertainty Distributions for Transfer Factors
- 10.09 -
Kd Values for SRS Soil
- 10.10 -
Far-Field Model Calibration
- 10.11 -
Far-Field Model Source Loading Approach
- 10.12 -
Far-Field Model Dispersion
- 10.13 -
Impact of Calcareous Zones on Contaminant Flow and Transport
- 10.14 -
Scenario Development and Defensibility
§ Periodic Monitoring Factors (i.e., MFs related to data that NRC staff expects to review on a periodic basis)
Low Priority
NRC/DOE Joint Plan for SDF
Purpose:
Identify Information Needed to Support NRC Finding of Reasonable Assurance that DOE Demonstrated Meeting Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations Part 61 Subpart C Performance Objectives at SDF
- Needed Information Based on NRC High-Priority Monitoring Factors
- DOE Establishes the Schedule of Providing Information to NRC
- Joint Plan Issued 10/23/2018 - ML18235A068 8
Monitoring at Tank Farms (TFs)
- FTF Monitoring Plan Issued in January 2013
- TFs Monitoring Plan Issued in October 2015 to Include HTF
- Eight Onsite Observation Visits Since 2012
- 15 TFs TRRs issued, including:
- tank grouting
- waste release
- final inventory and risk estimates after tank closure 9
Current Prioritization of TFs Monitoring Factors
- NRC Performed Independent Analysis to Risk-Inform TFs Monitoring Plan and Prioritize Monitoring Factors 10
NRC/DOE Successes at TFs
- Highest Priority Monitoring Factor 2.1 (Solubility-Limiting Phases/Limits and Validation) was Addressed by DOE in Recent Research Efforts 11
- Results of several years of waste release testing of Tank 18 high-level waste samples completed in 2016
- NRC staff completed Waste Release Testing Technical Review Report (TRR) in 2018
Path Forward for Monitoring at TFs
- Results of DOE Tank 18 Waste Release Experiments Indicated Risk-Significant Solubilities for Plutonium (Pu) and Higher than Expected Solubility for Other Key Radionuclides
- Next Steps Include:
- reduction in uncertainty in barriers affecting the timing and magnitude of peak Pu dose including:
- natural system attenuation (chemical barrier delaying timing and magnitude of peak dose)
- tank/grout performance (hydraulic and chemical barrier to release)
- tank vault performance (chemical barrier to release) 12
CNWRA Research to Support NRC NDAA WIR Monitoring at SRS
- More Recent Activities Included:
- tank grout groundwater conditioning experiments
- saltstone/technetium release experiments 13
List of Recent CNWRA Research Reports for NRC on SDF and TFs
- Saltstone Leaching Experiments-Status Report, September 2015. ML15302A086
- Tank Grout Water Conditioning Tests-Status Report, September 2015. ML15302A081
- Fiscal Year 2016 Tank Grout Water Conditioning Tests-Status Report, January 2017. ML18285A834
- Fiscal Year 2016 Saltstone Leaching Experiment-Status Report, May 2017. ML17221A038
- Two more reports expected soon 14
Future Activities at SRS
- NRC Will Review Revised SDF PA and Issue Revised SDF Technical Evaluation Report
- NRC Will Issue Revised SDF Monitoring Plan
- NRC Currently Reviewing DOE Revised General Separations Area Groundwater Model for SDF and TFs 15