ML11146A077: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML11146A077 | | number = ML11146A077 | ||
| issue date = 05/25/2011 | | issue date = 05/25/2011 | ||
| title = | | title = Ltr to ASLB Frm S. Turk | ||
| author name = Turk S | | author name = Turk S | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/OGC | | author affiliation = NRC/OGC | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 25,2011 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 190 Cedar Lane E. Mail Stop: T -3 F23 Ridgway, CO 81432 Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: T -3 F23 Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and Docket Nos. | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 25,2011 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 190 Cedar Lane E. | ||
Dear Administrative Judges: In accordance with my letter of May 20, 2011, following the prehearing teleconference of May 19, 2011, I discussed with Counsel for the State of New York ("State") | Mail Stop: T -3 F23 Ridgway, CO 81432 Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: T -3 F23 Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. | ||
the documents which the NRC Staff ("Staff') | (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3) | ||
is willing to produce in response to the State's motion to compel ("Motion"), dated April 22, 2011. I am pleased to report to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ("Board") | Docket Nos. 50-247-LR/286-LR | ||
that the Staff and the State have reached agreement on this matter. Specifically, the Staff has agreed to produce the following documents in response to the State's Motion: From Appendix A: DPP-010-009 DPP-018-005-except the discussion on pages 15-16, regarding potential work to prepare for hearings ("Follow On Approach") | |||
DPP-26-012 DPP-27-018 From Appendix C: NIA-050 Judge McDade May 25,2011 Judge Lathrop Judge Wardwell From Appendix C-1: NIA-075 NIA-076 NIA-077 NIA-078 NIA-079 NIA-080 NIA-081 NIA-082 NIA-083 NIA-084 NIA-085 NIA-086 NIA-087 NIA-088 NIA-089 In accordance with this agreement, I have agreed to transmit to the State a CD containing electronic copies of these documents. | ==Dear Administrative Judges:== | ||
As I stated during the prehearing teleconference, in producing these documents, the Staff does not waive any privilege(s) which it has previously asserted with respect to the disclosure of these or any other documents. | In accordance with my letter of May 20, 2011, following the prehearing teleconference of May 19, 2011, I discussed with Counsel for the State of New York ("State") the documents which the NRC Staff ("Staff') is willing to produce in response to the State's motion to compel | ||
Nonetheless, in order to facilitate the parties' use of these documents in the preparation of testimony and at hearing, the Staff will consider making these documents publicly available and will report its decision on this matter shortly. Counsel for the State has authorized me to represent that the Staffs production of the listed documents resolves the substantive issues that were raised in its Motion, such that the Motion may be dismissed upon the Staffs production of those documents. | ("Motion"), dated April 22, 2011. | ||
The State, however, reserves its right to challenge any privilege deSignations which the Staff may assert over the produced documents that may result in their restricted use in testimony or at hearing. Sincerely, Sherwin E. Turk Counsel for NRC Staff cc: Service List}} | I am pleased to report to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ("Board") that the Staff and the State have reached agreement on this matter. Specifically, the Staff has agreed to produce the following documents in response to the State's Motion: | ||
From Appendix A: | |||
DPP-010-009 DPP-018-005-except the discussion on pages 15-16, regarding potential work to prepare for hearings ("Follow On Approach") | |||
DPP-26-012 DPP-27-018 From Appendix C: | |||
NIA-050 | |||
Judge McDade May 25,2011 Judge Lathrop Judge Wardwell From Appendix C-1: | |||
NIA-075 NIA-091 NIA-076 NIA-092 NIA-077 NIA-093 NIA-078 NIA-094 NIA-079 NIA-095 NIA-080 NIA-096 NIA-081 NIA-097 NIA-082 NIA-098 NIA-083 NIA-099 NIA-084 NIA-100 NIA-085 NIA-101 NIA-086 NIA-102 NIA-087 NIA-103 NIA-088 NIA-105 NIA-089 NIA-107 NIA-090 In accordance with this agreement, I have agreed to transmit to the State a CD containing electronic copies of these documents. As I stated during the prehearing teleconference, in producing these documents, the Staff does not waive any privilege(s) which it has previously asserted with respect to the disclosure of these or any other documents. Nonetheless, in order to facilitate the parties' use of these documents in the preparation of testimony and at hearing, the Staff will consider making these documents publicly available and will report its decision on this matter shortly. | |||
Counsel for the State has authorized me to represent that the Staffs production of the above listed documents resolves the substantive issues that were raised in its Motion, such that the Motion may be dismissed upon the Staffs production of those documents. The State, however, reserves its right to challenge any privilege deSignations which the Staff may assert over the produced documents that may result in their restricted use in testimony or at hearing. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
"~~~ | |||
Sherwin E. Turk ~ | |||
Counsel for NRC Staff cc: Service List}} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:04, 13 January 2025
| ML11146A077 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/25/2011 |
| From: | Sherwin Turk NRC/OGC |
| To: | Lathrop K, Lawrence Mcdade, Richard Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Turk S | |
| References | |
| 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR | |
| Download: ML11146A077 (2) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 25,2011 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 190 Cedar Lane E.
Mail Stop: T -3 F23 Ridgway, CO 81432 Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: T -3 F23 Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3)
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR/286-LR
Dear Administrative Judges:
In accordance with my letter of May 20, 2011, following the prehearing teleconference of May 19, 2011, I discussed with Counsel for the State of New York ("State") the documents which the NRC Staff ("Staff') is willing to produce in response to the State's motion to compel
("Motion"), dated April 22, 2011.
I am pleased to report to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ("Board") that the Staff and the State have reached agreement on this matter. Specifically, the Staff has agreed to produce the following documents in response to the State's Motion:
From Appendix A:
DPP-010-009 DPP-018-005-except the discussion on pages 15-16, regarding potential work to prepare for hearings ("Follow On Approach")
DPP-26-012 DPP-27-018 From Appendix C:
NIA-050
Judge McDade May 25,2011 Judge Lathrop Judge Wardwell From Appendix C-1:
NIA-075 NIA-091 NIA-076 NIA-092 NIA-077 NIA-093 NIA-078 NIA-094 NIA-079 NIA-095 NIA-080 NIA-096 NIA-081 NIA-097 NIA-082 NIA-098 NIA-083 NIA-099 NIA-084 NIA-100 NIA-085 NIA-101 NIA-086 NIA-102 NIA-087 NIA-103 NIA-088 NIA-105 NIA-089 NIA-107 NIA-090 In accordance with this agreement, I have agreed to transmit to the State a CD containing electronic copies of these documents. As I stated during the prehearing teleconference, in producing these documents, the Staff does not waive any privilege(s) which it has previously asserted with respect to the disclosure of these or any other documents. Nonetheless, in order to facilitate the parties' use of these documents in the preparation of testimony and at hearing, the Staff will consider making these documents publicly available and will report its decision on this matter shortly.
Counsel for the State has authorized me to represent that the Staffs production of the above listed documents resolves the substantive issues that were raised in its Motion, such that the Motion may be dismissed upon the Staffs production of those documents. The State, however, reserves its right to challenge any privilege deSignations which the Staff may assert over the produced documents that may result in their restricted use in testimony or at hearing.
Sincerely,
"~~~
Sherwin E. Turk ~
Counsel for NRC Staff cc: Service List