ML11259A265: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11259A265
| number = ML11259A265
| issue date = 09/16/2011
| issue date = 09/16/2011
| title = Applicants Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. Applicants Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc
| title = Applicant’S Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. Applicant’S Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, I
| author name = Bessette P, O'Neill M, Sutton K
| author name = Bessette P, O'Neill M, Sutton K
| author affiliation = Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| author affiliation = Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of   ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of  
  )   50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. )  
)
  )
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and  
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) )  
)
50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.  
)  
)
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)  
)
)
September 16, 2011 APPLICANTS REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY TO THE COMBINED REPLY OF RIVERKEEPER, INC. AND HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER, INC.
In accordance with Section G.3 of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards July 1, 2010 Scheduling Order,1 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) hereby requests leave to file a surreply to the Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.s Combined Reply to NRC Staff and Entergys Answers in Opposition to Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Fukushima Task Force Report (Combined Reply) and the associated Reply Memorandum filed on September 13, 2011.2 In support of this request, Entergy respectfully states as follows:
: 1.
On August 11, 2011, Riverkeeper, Inc. (Riverkeeper) and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. (Clearwater) (jointly, Intervenors) filed a Motion to admit a proposed New Contention in this proceeding purportedly based on new and significant information presented by the NRC in its report, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The 1
Licensing Board Scheduling Order at 7 (July 1, 2010) (unpublished).
2 See Reply Memorandum Regarding Timeliness and Admissibility of New Contentions Seeking Consideration of Environmental Implications of Fukushima Task Force Report in Individual Reactor Licensing Proceedings (Sept. 13, 2011).
Near-term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident (July 12, 2011) (the Task Force Report).3
: 2.
On September 6, 2011, Entergy and the NRC Staff each filed Answers opposing the admission of the New Contention on the grounds that it does not meet the NRCs contention timeliness and admissibility criteria in 10 C.F.R. § 2.309.4
: 3.
Three days later, on September 9, 2011, the Commission issued a Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05), in which it ruled on a series of petitions filed in numerous proceedings to suspend adjudicatory, licensing, and rulemaking activities, and requesting additional related relief, in light of the March 2011 events at Fukishima.5 CLI-11-05 indicates that Riverkeepers and Clearwaters Rulemaking Petition (and associated suspension request) was among the many filings underlying the Commissions ruling.6
: 4.
Shortly thereafter, on September 13, 2011, the Intervenors filed their Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum in response to the Answers of Entergy and the NRC Staff. In the Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum, Intervenors discuss the relevance and effect of CLI-11-05 with respect to their New Contention, suggesting that it supports admission of the contention.7 3
Motion to Admit Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New Contention Regarding NEPA Requirement to Address Safety and Environmental Implications of the NRC Fukushima Task Force Report (Aug. 11, 2011) (Motion); Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New Contention Regarding NEPA Requirement to Address Safety and Environmental Implications of the NRC Fukushima Task Force Report (Aug. 11, 2011) (New Contention).
4 See Applicants Answer to Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.s Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Fukushima Task Force Report (Sept. 6, 2011) (Applicants Answer); NRC Staffs Answer In Opposition to Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Safety and Environmental Implications of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Task Force Report on the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident (Sept. 6, 2011) (NRC Staffs Answer).
5 See Union Elec. Co. d/b/a/ Ameren Missouri (Callaway Plant, Unit 2), CLI-11-05, 74 NRC __, slip op. (Sept. 9, 2011).
6 See id., Appendix at 18.
7 Combined Reply at 2; Reply Memorandum at 1-4.
: 5.
Unlike Riverkeeper and Clearwater, Entergy did not have an opportunity to address the implications of CLI-11-05 relative to the admissibility of the New Contention.
Relevant here, a portion of the Commissions decision addresses claims that the Fukushima eventsas discussed in the Task Force Reportconstitute new and significant information under NEPA that must be analyzed as part of the environmental review for new reactor and license renewal decisions.8 Accordingly, Entergy submits that its inability to address the import of CLI-11-05 in its Answer, due solely to the timing of that decision, constitutes good cause for the filing of a brief surreply to address the relevance of CLI-11-5 to the proposed new contention. Indeed, the Combined Reply recognizes as much, stating that the Intervenors would not object to a response by Entergy and the Staff to their arguments regarding the relevance of CLI-11-05 to their contention.9
: 6.
In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), Counsel for Entergy has contacted Counsel for the NRC Staff, who stated that he does not oppose Entergys Motion for Leave to file a limited surreply. Intervenors noted their lack of objection in their Combined Reply.
8 See CLI-11-05, slip op. at 30-31.
9 Combined Reply at 2 n.4 (Because Entergy and the NRC Staff have not had an opportunity to address the effect of CLI-11-05 on the timeliness and admissibility of Intervenors contention, Intervenors would not object to a response by Entergy and the Staff to their arguments regarding the relevance of CLI-11-05 to their contention.).
WHEREFORE, Entergy respectfully requests that the Board grant its Motion for Leave to file a brief surreply to the Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum on or before Tuesday, September 20, 2011.
Respectfully submitted, Signed (electronically) by Paul M. Bessette William C. Dennis, Esq.
Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Paul M. Bessette, Esq.
440 Hamilton Avenue Martin J. ONeill, Esq.
White Plains, NY 10601 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Phone: (914) 272-3202 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Fax: (914) 272-3205 Washington, D.C. 20004 E-mail: wdennis@entergy.com Phone: (202) 739-3000 Fax: (202) 739-3001 E-mail: ksutton@morganlewis.com E-mail: pbessette@morganlewis.com E-mail: martin.oneill@morganlewis.com COUNSEL FOR ENTERGY Dated in Washington, D.C.
this 16th day of September 2011


  ) September 16, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of  
 
)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY TO THE COMBINED REPLY  OF RIVERKEEPER, INC. AND HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER, INC.
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and  
In accordance with Section G.3 of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's July 1, 2010 Scheduling Order, 1 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("En tergy") hereby requests leave to file a surreply to the "Riverkeeper, In
)
: c. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.'s Combined Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy's Answers in Opposition to Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Fukushima Task Force Report" ("Combined Reply") and the associated Reply Memorandum filed on September 13, 2011.
50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.  
2  In support of this request, Entergy respectfully states as follows:
)  
: 1. On August 11, 2011, Riverkeeper, Inc. ("
)
Riverkeeper") and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. ("Clearwater") (jointly, "Intervenors") filed a Motion to admit a proposed New Contention in this proceeding purportedly based on new and significant information presented by the NRC in its report, "Recommendations for Enha ncing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)  
 
)  
1  Licensing Board Scheduling Order at 7 (July 1, 2010) (unpublished).
)
2  See Reply Memorandum Regarding Timeliness and Admissibility of New Contentions Seeking Consideration of Environmental Implications of Fukushima Task Force Report in Individual Reactor Licensing Proceedings (Sept. 13, 2011). Near-term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ic hi Accident" (July 12, 2011) (the "Task Force Report").
September 16, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that, on September 16, 2011, a copy of Applicants Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc., was served electronically with the Electronic Information Exchange on the following recipients:
3 2. On September 6, 2011, Entergy and the NRC Staff each filed Answers opposing the admission of the New Contention on the grounds that it does not meet the NRC's contention timeliness and admissibility criteria in 10 C.F.R. § 2.309.
Administrative Judge Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Lawrence.McDade@nrc.gov)
4  3. Three days later, on September 9, 2011, the Commission issued a Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05), in which it ruled on a series of petitions filed in numerous proceedings to suspend adjudicatory, licensing, and rulemaking ac tivities, and requesting additional related relief, in light of the March 2011 events at Fukishima.
Administrative Judge Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel 190 Cedar Lane E.
5  CLI-11-05 indicates that Riverkeeper's and Clearwater's Rulemaking Petition (and associated suspension request) was among the many filings underlying the Commission's ruling.
Ridgway, CO 81432 (E-mail: Kaye.Lathrop@nrc.gov)
6  4. Shortly thereafter, on September 13, 2011, th e Intervenors filed their Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum in response to the An swers of Entergy and the NRC Staff. In the Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum, Intervenors discuss the "relevance" and "effect" of CLI-11-05 with respect to their New Contention, suggesting that it supports admission of the contention.
Administrative Judge Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov)
7 3  Motion to Admit Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New Contention Regarding NEPA Requirement to Address Safety and Environmental Implications of the NRC Fukushima Task Force Report (Aug. 11, 2011) ("Motion"); Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New Contention Regarding NEPA Requirement to Address Safety and Environmental Implications of the NRC Fukushima Task Force Report (Aug. 11, 2011) ("New Contention").
Office of the Secretary Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov)
4  See Applicant's Answer to Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.'s Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Fukushima Task Force Report (Sept. 6, 2011) ("Applicant's Answer"); NRC Staff's Answer In Opposition to Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Safety and Environmental Implications of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Task Force Report on the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident (Sept. 6, 2011) ("NRC Staff's Answer").
Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: O-7H4M Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: ocaamail.resource@nrc.gov)
5  See Union Elec. Co. d/b/a/ Ameren Missouri (Callaway Plant, Unit 2), CLI-11-05, 74 NRC __, slip op. (Sept. 9, 2011). 6  See id., Appendix at 18.
Josh Kirstein, Law Clerk Katherine Tucker, Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov)
7  Combined Reply at 2; Reply Memorandum at 1-4. 5. Unlike Riverkeeper and Clearwater, Ente rgy did not have an opportunity to address the implications of CLI-11-05 relative to the admissib ility of the New Contention.
(E-mail: Katie.Tucker@nrc.gov)  
Relevant here, a portion of the Commission's decision addresses claims that the Fukushima events-as discussed in the Task Force Report-constitute "new and significant information" under NEPA that must be analyzed as part of the environmental review for new reactor and license renewal decisions.
8  Accordingly, Entergy submits that its inability to address the import of CLI-11-05 in its Answer, due solely to the timing of that decision, constitutes good cause for
 
the filing of a brief surreply to address the relevance of CLI-11-5 to the proposed new contention. Indeed, the Combined Reply recognizes as much, stat ing that the "Intervenors would not object to a response by Entergy and the Staff to their arguments regarding the relevance of CLI-11-05 to their contention."
9 6. In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), Counsel for Entergy has contacted Counsel for the NRC Staff, who stated that he does not oppose Entergy' s Motion for Leave to file a limited surreply. Intervenors noted thei r lack of objection in their Combined Reply.
 
8  See CLI-11-05, slip op. at 30-31.
9  Combined Reply at 2 n.4 ("Because Entergy and the NRC Staff have not had an opportunity to address the effect of CLI-11-05 on the timeliness and admissibility of Intervenors' contention, Intervenors would not object to a response by Entergy and the Staff to their arguments regarding the relevance of CLI-11-05 to their contention."). WHEREFORE, Entergy respectfully requests that the Board grant its Motion for Leave to file a brief surreply to the Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum on or before Tuesday, September 20, 2011.
 
Respectfully submitted, Signed (electronically) by Paul M. Bessette William C. Dennis, Esq. Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Paul M. Bessette, Esq. 440 Hamilton Avenue    Martin J. O'Neill, Esq.
White Plains, NY 10601 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Phone:  (914) 272-3202  1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Fax:  (914) 272-3205 Washington, D.C. 20004 E-mail:  wdennis@entergy.com  Phone: (202) 739-3000 Fax:  (202) 739-3001 E-mail:  ksutton@morganlewis.com E-mail:  pbessette@morganlewis.com E-mail:  martin.oneill@morganlewis.com
 
COUNSEL FOR ENTERGY 
 
Dated in Washington, D.C.
this 16th day of September 2011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of   ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and
  )   50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. )  
  )
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) )  
 
  ) September 16, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that, on September 16, 2011 , a copy of "Applicant's Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Huds on River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.," was served electronically with the Electronic Informa tion Exchange on the following recipients:
 
Administrative Judge  
 
Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel  
 
Mail Stop: T-3 F23  
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Lawrence.McDade@nrc.gov)
Administrative Judge Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel  
 
190 Cedar Lane E.  
 
Ridgway, CO 81432 (E-mail: Kaye.Lathrop@nrc.gov) Administrative Judge Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel  
 
Mail Stop: T-3 F23  
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov)  
 
Office of the Secretary Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov)
Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: O-7H4M  
 
Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: ocaamail.resource@nrc.gov)
Josh Kirstein, Law Clerk Katherine Tucker, Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel  
 
Mail Stop: T-3 F23  
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov)
(E-mail: Katie.Tucker@nrc.gov)
 
2  Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.
 
David E. Roth, Esq.
 
Brian G. Harris, Esq.
 
Andrea Z. Jones, Esq.
 
Office of the General Counsel
 
Mail Stop:  O-15D21
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC  20555-0001 (E-mail:  Sherwin.Turk@nrc.gov)
(E-mail:  Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov)
(E-mail:  david.roth@nrc.gov)
(E-mail:  brian.harris@nrc.gov)
(E-mail:  andrea.jones@nrc.gov)  


2 Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.
David E. Roth, Esq.
Brian G. Harris, Esq.
Andrea Z. Jones, Esq.
Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-15D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Sherwin.Turk@nrc.gov)
(E-mail: Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov)
(E-mail: david.roth@nrc.gov)
(E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov)
(E-mail: andrea.jones@nrc.gov)
Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq.
Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney  
Assistant County Attorney Office of Robert F. Meehan, Esq.
 
Westchester County Attorney 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor White Plains, NY 10601 (E-mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com)
Office of Robert F. Meehan, Esq.  
Manna Jo Greene Stephen C. Filler Karla Raimundi Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
 
724 Wolcott Ave.
Westchester County Attorney  
Beacon, NY 12508 (E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org)
 
(E-mail: karla@clearwater.org)
148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor  
(E-mail: stephenfiller@gmail.com)
 
White Plains, NY 10601 (E-mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com)
Manna Jo Greene Stephen C. Filler Karla Raimundi  
 
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
724 Wolcott Ave.  
 
Beacon, NY 12508 (E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org)
(E-mail: karla@clearwater.org)
(E-mail: stephenfiller@gmail.com)  
 
Thomas F. Wood, Esq.
Thomas F. Wood, Esq.
Daniel Riesel, Esq.  
Daniel Riesel, Esq.
 
Victoria Shiah, Esq.
Victoria Shiah, Esq.  
Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.
 
460 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 (E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com)
Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.  
(E-mail: vshiah@sprlaw.com)
 
Joan Leary Matthews, Esq.
460 Park Avenue  
Associate Commissioner Hearings and Mediation Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany, NY 12233-1500 (E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us)
 
John Louis Parker, Esq.
New York, NY 10022 (E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com)
Office of General Counsel, Region 3 NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation 21 S. Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561-1620 (E-mail: jlparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us)
(E-mail: vshiah@sprlaw.com)  
 
Joan Leary Matthews, Esq. Associate Commissioner Hearings and Medi ation Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation  
 
625 Broadway, 14th Floor
 
Albany, NY 12233-1500 (E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us)  
 
John Louis Parker, Esq. Office of General Counsel, Region 3 NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation  
 
21 S. Putt Corners Road  
 
New Paltz, New York 12561-1620 (E-mail: jlparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us)  
 
John J. Sipos, Esq.
John J. Sipos, Esq.
Charlie Donaldson Esq.
Charlie Donaldson Esq.
Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General  
Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York The Capitol Albany, NY 12224-0341 (E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov)
 
Michael J. Delaney, Esq.
of the State of New York  
Vice President -Energy Department New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCDEC) 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 mdelaney@nycedc.com
 
The Capitol


Albany, NY 12224-0341 (E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov)
3 DB1/ 68132912.1 Phillip Musegaas, Esq.
Michael J. Delaney, Esq. Vice President -Energy Department New York City Economic Development
 
Corporation (NYCDEC) 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 
 
mdelaney@nycedc.com
 
3 DB1/ 68132912.1 Phillip Musegaas, Esq.
Deborah Brancato, Esq.
Deborah Brancato, Esq.
Riverkeeper, Inc.  
Riverkeeper, Inc.
 
20 Secor Road Ossining, NY 10562 (E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org)
20 Secor Road  
(E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org)
 
Daniel E. ONeill, Mayor James Siermarco, M.S.
Ossining, NY 10562 (E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org)
Village of Buchanan Municipal Building 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 (E-mail: vob@bestweb.net)
(E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org) Daniel E. O'Neill, Mayor James Siermarco, M.S.
(E-mail: smurray@villageofbuchanan.com)
Village of Buchanan Municipal Building  
 
236 Tate Avenue  
 
Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 (E-mail: vob@bestweb.net)
(E-mail: smurray@villageofbuchanan.com)
 
Robert D. Snook, Esq.
Robert D. Snook, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General  
Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 (E-mail: Robert.Snook@po.state.ct.us)
 
Janice A. Dean, Esq.
State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street  
Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, New York 10271 (E-mail: Janice.Dean@ag.ny.gov)
 
Signed (electronically) by Paul M. Bessette Paul M. Bessette, Esq.
P.O. Box 120  
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
 
Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone: (202) 739-5796 Fax: (202) 739-3001 E-mail: pbessette@morganlewis.com COUNSEL FOR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.}}
Hartford, CT 06141-0120 (E-mail: Robert.Snook@po.state.ct.us)  
 
Janice A. Dean, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General
 
of the State of New York  
 
120 Broadway, 26th Floor  
 
New York, New York 10271 (E-mail: Janice.Dean@ag.ny.gov)
Signed (electronically) by Paul M. Bessette Paul M. Bessette, Esq.       MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone: (202) 739-5796       Fax: (202) 739-3001       E-mail: pbessette@morganlewis.com  
 
COUNSEL FOR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.}}

Latest revision as of 02:00, 13 January 2025

Applicant’S Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. Applicant’S Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, I
ML11259A265
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/16/2011
From: Bessette P, O'Neill M, Sutton K
Morgan, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP-07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML11259A265 (7)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of

)

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and

)

50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

)

)

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

)

)

September 16, 2011 APPLICANTS REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY TO THE COMBINED REPLY OF RIVERKEEPER, INC. AND HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER, INC.

In accordance with Section G.3 of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards July 1, 2010 Scheduling Order,1 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) hereby requests leave to file a surreply to the Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.s Combined Reply to NRC Staff and Entergys Answers in Opposition to Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Fukushima Task Force Report (Combined Reply) and the associated Reply Memorandum filed on September 13, 2011.2 In support of this request, Entergy respectfully states as follows:

1.

On August 11, 2011, Riverkeeper, Inc. (Riverkeeper) and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. (Clearwater) (jointly, Intervenors) filed a Motion to admit a proposed New Contention in this proceeding purportedly based on new and significant information presented by the NRC in its report, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The 1

Licensing Board Scheduling Order at 7 (July 1, 2010) (unpublished).

2 See Reply Memorandum Regarding Timeliness and Admissibility of New Contentions Seeking Consideration of Environmental Implications of Fukushima Task Force Report in Individual Reactor Licensing Proceedings (Sept. 13, 2011).

Near-term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident (July 12, 2011) (the Task Force Report).3

2.

On September 6, 2011, Entergy and the NRC Staff each filed Answers opposing the admission of the New Contention on the grounds that it does not meet the NRCs contention timeliness and admissibility criteria in 10 C.F.R. § 2.309.4

3.

Three days later, on September 9, 2011, the Commission issued a Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05), in which it ruled on a series of petitions filed in numerous proceedings to suspend adjudicatory, licensing, and rulemaking activities, and requesting additional related relief, in light of the March 2011 events at Fukishima.5 CLI-11-05 indicates that Riverkeepers and Clearwaters Rulemaking Petition (and associated suspension request) was among the many filings underlying the Commissions ruling.6

4.

Shortly thereafter, on September 13, 2011, the Intervenors filed their Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum in response to the Answers of Entergy and the NRC Staff. In the Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum, Intervenors discuss the relevance and effect of CLI-11-05 with respect to their New Contention, suggesting that it supports admission of the contention.7 3

Motion to Admit Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New Contention Regarding NEPA Requirement to Address Safety and Environmental Implications of the NRC Fukushima Task Force Report (Aug. 11, 2011) (Motion); Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. New Contention Regarding NEPA Requirement to Address Safety and Environmental Implications of the NRC Fukushima Task Force Report (Aug. 11, 2011) (New Contention).

4 See Applicants Answer to Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.s Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Fukushima Task Force Report (Sept. 6, 2011) (Applicants Answer); NRC Staffs Answer In Opposition to Motion to Admit New Contention Regarding the Safety and Environmental Implications of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Task Force Report on the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident (Sept. 6, 2011) (NRC Staffs Answer).

5 See Union Elec. Co. d/b/a/ Ameren Missouri (Callaway Plant, Unit 2), CLI-11-05, 74 NRC __, slip op. (Sept. 9, 2011).

6 See id., Appendix at 18.

7 Combined Reply at 2; Reply Memorandum at 1-4.

5.

Unlike Riverkeeper and Clearwater, Entergy did not have an opportunity to address the implications of CLI-11-05 relative to the admissibility of the New Contention.

Relevant here, a portion of the Commissions decision addresses claims that the Fukushima eventsas discussed in the Task Force Reportconstitute new and significant information under NEPA that must be analyzed as part of the environmental review for new reactor and license renewal decisions.8 Accordingly, Entergy submits that its inability to address the import of CLI-11-05 in its Answer, due solely to the timing of that decision, constitutes good cause for the filing of a brief surreply to address the relevance of CLI-11-5 to the proposed new contention. Indeed, the Combined Reply recognizes as much, stating that the Intervenors would not object to a response by Entergy and the Staff to their arguments regarding the relevance of CLI-11-05 to their contention.9

6.

In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), Counsel for Entergy has contacted Counsel for the NRC Staff, who stated that he does not oppose Entergys Motion for Leave to file a limited surreply. Intervenors noted their lack of objection in their Combined Reply.

8 See CLI-11-05, slip op. at 30-31.

9 Combined Reply at 2 n.4 (Because Entergy and the NRC Staff have not had an opportunity to address the effect of CLI-11-05 on the timeliness and admissibility of Intervenors contention, Intervenors would not object to a response by Entergy and the Staff to their arguments regarding the relevance of CLI-11-05 to their contention.).

WHEREFORE, Entergy respectfully requests that the Board grant its Motion for Leave to file a brief surreply to the Combined Reply and Reply Memorandum on or before Tuesday, September 20, 2011.

Respectfully submitted, Signed (electronically) by Paul M. Bessette William C. Dennis, Esq.

Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Paul M. Bessette, Esq.

440 Hamilton Avenue Martin J. ONeill, Esq.

White Plains, NY 10601 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Phone: (914) 272-3202 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Fax: (914) 272-3205 Washington, D.C. 20004 E-mail: wdennis@entergy.com Phone: (202) 739-3000 Fax: (202) 739-3001 E-mail: ksutton@morganlewis.com E-mail: pbessette@morganlewis.com E-mail: martin.oneill@morganlewis.com COUNSEL FOR ENTERGY Dated in Washington, D.C.

this 16th day of September 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of

)

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and

)

50-286-LR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

)

)

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

)

)

September 16, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that, on September 16, 2011, a copy of Applicants Request to File a Surreply to the Combined Reply of Riverkeeper, Inc. and Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc., was served electronically with the Electronic Information Exchange on the following recipients:

Administrative Judge Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Lawrence.McDade@nrc.gov)

Administrative Judge Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel 190 Cedar Lane E.

Ridgway, CO 81432 (E-mail: Kaye.Lathrop@nrc.gov)

Administrative Judge Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov)

Office of the Secretary Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov)

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: O-7H4M Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: ocaamail.resource@nrc.gov)

Josh Kirstein, Law Clerk Katherine Tucker, Law Clerk Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov)

(E-mail: Katie.Tucker@nrc.gov)

2 Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.

Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.

David E. Roth, Esq.

Brian G. Harris, Esq.

Andrea Z. Jones, Esq.

Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-15D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (E-mail: Sherwin.Turk@nrc.gov)

(E-mail: Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov)

(E-mail: david.roth@nrc.gov)

(E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov)

(E-mail: andrea.jones@nrc.gov)

Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq.

Assistant County Attorney Office of Robert F. Meehan, Esq.

Westchester County Attorney 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor White Plains, NY 10601 (E-mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com)

Manna Jo Greene Stephen C. Filler Karla Raimundi Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.

724 Wolcott Ave.

Beacon, NY 12508 (E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org)

(E-mail: karla@clearwater.org)

(E-mail: stephenfiller@gmail.com)

Thomas F. Wood, Esq.

Daniel Riesel, Esq.

Victoria Shiah, Esq.

Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.

460 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 (E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com)

(E-mail: vshiah@sprlaw.com)

Joan Leary Matthews, Esq.

Associate Commissioner Hearings and Mediation Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany, NY 12233-1500 (E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us)

John Louis Parker, Esq.

Office of General Counsel, Region 3 NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation 21 S. Putt Corners Road New Paltz, New York 12561-1620 (E-mail: jlparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us)

John J. Sipos, Esq.

Charlie Donaldson Esq.

Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York The Capitol Albany, NY 12224-0341 (E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov)

Michael J. Delaney, Esq.

Vice President -Energy Department New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCDEC) 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 mdelaney@nycedc.com

3 DB1/ 68132912.1 Phillip Musegaas, Esq.

Deborah Brancato, Esq.

Riverkeeper, Inc.

20 Secor Road Ossining, NY 10562 (E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org)

(E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org)

Daniel E. ONeill, Mayor James Siermarco, M.S.

Village of Buchanan Municipal Building 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 (E-mail: vob@bestweb.net)

(E-mail: smurray@villageofbuchanan.com)

Robert D. Snook, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 (E-mail: Robert.Snook@po.state.ct.us)

Janice A. Dean, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, New York 10271 (E-mail: Janice.Dean@ag.ny.gov)

Signed (electronically) by Paul M. Bessette Paul M. Bessette, Esq.

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone: (202) 739-5796 Fax: (202) 739-3001 E-mail: pbessette@morganlewis.com COUNSEL FOR ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML11259A265&oldid=5272547"