ML14050A135: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML14050A135 | | number = ML14050A135 | ||
| issue date = 02/18/2014 | | issue date = 02/18/2014 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise the Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise the Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule | ||
| author name = Wengert T | | author name = Wengert T | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wengert, Thomas Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 2:02 PM To: hletheridge@aep.com Cc: mkscarpello@aep.com | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: | ||
Wengert, Thomas Sent: | |||
Tuesday, February 18, 2014 2:02 PM To: | |||
hletheridge@aep.com Cc: | |||
mkscarpello@aep.com | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise the Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule (TAC Nos. MF3363 and MF3364) | D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise the Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule (TAC Nos. MF3363 and MF3364) | ||
By letter dated January 10, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and | By {{letter dated|date=January 10, 2014|text=letter dated January 10, 2014}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in | Accession No. ML14015A142), Indiana Michigan Power Company submitted a license amendment request to revise the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this license amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this license amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Tom Wengert | Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL3-1 (301) 415-4037 | ||
Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL3-1 (301) 415-4037 | |||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: | ||
NRR_PMDA Email Number: | |||
1109 Mail Envelope Properties (000501cf2cdb$e98dad70$bca90850$) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise the Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule (TAC Nos. MF3363 and MF3364) | D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise the Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule (TAC Nos. MF3363 and MF3364) | ||
Sent Date: | |||
Post Office: | 2/18/2014 2:02:04 PM Received Date: | ||
2/18/2014 2:02:04 PM From: | |||
Options | Wengert, Thomas Created By: | ||
Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
"mkscarpello@aep.com" <mkscarpello@aep.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None "hletheridge@aep.com" <hletheridge@aep.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | |||
Domain Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1788 2/18/2014 2:02:04 PM Options Priority: | |||
Standard Return Notification: | |||
No Reply Requested: | |||
No Sensitivity: | |||
Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 23:06, 10 January 2025
| ML14050A135 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 02/18/2014 |
| From: | Thomas Wengert Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Etheridge H, Scarpello M Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| References | |
| MF3363, MF3364 | |
| Download: ML14050A135 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Wengert, Thomas Sent:
Tuesday, February 18, 2014 2:02 PM To:
hletheridge@aep.com Cc:
mkscarpello@aep.com
Subject:
D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise the Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule (TAC Nos. MF3363 and MF3364)
By letter dated January 10, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML14015A142), Indiana Michigan Power Company submitted a license amendment request to revise the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of this license amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL3-1 (301) 415-4037
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
1109 Mail Envelope Properties (000501cf2cdb$e98dad70$bca90850$)
Subject:
D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise the Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule (TAC Nos. MF3363 and MF3364)
Sent Date:
2/18/2014 2:02:04 PM Received Date:
2/18/2014 2:02:04 PM From:
Wengert, Thomas Created By:
Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov Recipients:
"mkscarpello@aep.com" <mkscarpello@aep.com>
Tracking Status: None "hletheridge@aep.com" <hletheridge@aep.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Domain Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1788 2/18/2014 2:02:04 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: