05000263/FIN-2011010-05: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| INPO aspect =  
| INPO aspect =  
| description =  
| description = \
The licensee identified a finding of very low safety significance (Green) and associated NCV of License condition 2.C.4 for the failure to implement and maintain in effect all provisions of their approved fire protection program. This includes adhering to the 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Quality Assurance Program requirements for the design, procurement, installation, testing and administrative controls for the fire protection program. Title 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, Test Control, requires, in part, that test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements have been satisfied. Contrary to this requirement, on April 30, 2009, the licensee failed to document and evaluate the results of a PMT that did not meet all of its acceptance criteria. Specifically, when a step in the PMT required flow through the inspector test valve was not accomplished, the PMT was not annotated as failure and the PMT work order was signed off as complete without further evaluation. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the Mitigating Systems cornerstone attribute of Protection Against External Factors (Fire) and affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e., core damage). Using IMC 0609, Appendix F, Fire Protection SDP, and the Monticello SPAR model, the inspectors determined that this finding had very low safety significance. The licensee entered this issue into their corrective action program as AR 01304348, Failed PMT results not captured in PMT WO, in order to perform further evaluation of the deficiency.  
The licensee identified a finding of very low safety significance (Green) and associated NCV of License condition 2.C.4 for the failure to implement and maintain in effect all provisions of their approved fire protection program. This includes adhering to the 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Quality Assurance Program requirements for the design, procurement, installation, testing and administrative controls for the fire protection program. Title 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, Test Control, requires, in part, that test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements have been satisfied. Contrary to this requirement, on April 30, 2009, the licensee failed to document and evaluate the results of a PMT that did not meet all of its acceptance criteria. Specifically, when a step in the PMT required flow through the inspector test valve was not accomplished, the PMT was not annotated as failure and the PMT work order was signed off as complete without further evaluation. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the Mitigating Systems cornerstone attribute of Protection Against External Factors (Fire) and affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e., core damage). Using IMC 0609, Appendix F, Fire Protection SDP, and the Monticello SPAR model, the inspectors determined that this finding had very low safety significance. The licensee entered this issue into their corrective action program as AR 01304348, Failed PMT results not captured in PMT WO, in order to perform further evaluation of the deficiency.  
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 10:44, 30 May 2018

05
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Report IR 05000263/2011010 Section 4OA7
Date counted Dec 31, 2011 (2011Q4)
Type: NCV: Green
cornerstone Mitigating Systems
Identified by: Licensee-identified
Inspection Procedure:
Inspectors (proximate) D Szwarc
A Stone
P Voss
C Tilton
INPO aspect
'