ML18010A369: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18010A369
| number = ML18010A369
| issue date = 08/16/1991
| issue date = 08/16/1991
| title = Responds to NRC 910723 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/91-15.Corrective Actions:Procedure on Temporary Bypass,Jumper & Wire Removal Updated to State Use of Jumpers During Troubleshooting Is Excluded from Scope of AP-024
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/91-15.Corrective Actions:Procedure on Temporary Bypass,Jumper & Wire Removal Updated to State Use of Jumpers During Troubleshooting Is Excluded from Scope of AP-024
| author name = Watson R
| author name = Watson R
| author affiliation = CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NLS-91-212, NUDOCS 9108260104
| document report number = NLS-91-212, NUDOCS 9108260104
| title reference date = 07-23-1991
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 7
| page count = 7
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000400/1991015]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTPATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
DISTRIBUTION
ESSION NBR:9108260104 DOC.DATE: 91/08/16 NOTARIZED: YES FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION WATSON,R.A.
DEMONSTPATION
Carolina Power 6 Light Co.
SYSTEM REGULATORY
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
INFORMATION
DOCKET 05000400 R
DISTRIBUTION
 
SYSTEM (RIDS)ESSION NBR:9108260104
==SUBJECT:==
DOC.DATE: 91/08/16 NOTARIZED:
Responds to NRC 910723 ltr re violations noted in insp rept 50-400/91-15.Corrective actions:Procedure on Temporary Bypass, Jumper
YES FACIL:50-400
& Wire removal updated to state use of gumpers during troubleshooting is excluded from scope of AP-024.
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
WATSON,R.A.
IE14D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
Carolina Power 6 Light Co.RECIP.NAME
]
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
ENCL SIZE:
Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)DOCKET 05000400 R SUBJECT: Responds to NRC 910723 ltr re violations
TITLE: Enforcement Action Non-2.790-Licensee
noted in insp rept 50-400/91-15.Corrective
 
actions:Procedure
===Response===
on Temporary Bypass, Jumper&Wire removal updated to state use of gumpers during troubleshooting
NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed.
is excluded from scope of AP-024.DISTRIBUTION
05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 LA MOZAFARI,B.
CODE: IE14D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA DEDRO NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE DIE
]ENCL!SIZE: TITLE: Enforcement
~5EG~Z-.LE'2 RGN2/DRSS/EPRPB EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
Action Non-2.790-Licensee
1 1
Response NOTES:Application
1 1
for permit renewal filed.05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 LA MOZAFARI,B.
1 1
INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA DEDRO NRR/PMAS/ILRB12
1 1
OE DIE~5EG~Z-.LE'2
1 1
RGN2/DRSS/EPRPB
1 1
EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIP1ENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 PD AEOD/DSP/TPAB
1 1
NRR/DOEA/OEAB11
1 1
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
1 RECIP1ENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 PD AEOD/DSP/TPAB NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OE FILE 01 RGN2 FILE 03 NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
OE FILE 01 RGN2 FILE 03 NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D D D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
1 1
D D PLEASE HELP US TO RFDUCE WASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl.-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION
1 1
LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!TAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL 16  
1 1
0  
1 1
COAL Carolina Power&Ltgkt Company P.O.Box 1551~Raleigh.N.C.27602 R.A.WATSON Senicr Vice Prestrtent
1 1
Nuclear Generation
1 D
SERIAL: NLS-91-212
D D
10 CFR 2.201 United States Nuclear Regulatory
NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
Commission
D D
ATTENTION:
PLEASE HELP US TO RFDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl.-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO.50-400/LICENSE
TAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
NO.NPF-63 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION (EA 91-076)I Gentlemen:
LTTR 16 ENCL 16
On July 23, 1991, the Nuclear Regulatory
 
Commission
0
issued a Notice of Violation (EA 91-076)for issues at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.Details of the NRC inspection
 
are provided in Inspection
COAL Carolina Power & Ltgkt Company P. O. Box 1551
Report No..50-400/91-15
~ Raleigh. N. C. 27602 R. A. WATSON Senicr Vice Prestrtent Nuclear Generation SERIAL:
dated July 23, 1991.Carolina Power&Light Company hereby responds to the Notice of Violation.
NLS-91-212 10 CFR 2.201 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTENTION: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-400/LICENSE NO. NPF-63 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION (EA 91-076)
The enclosure to this letter provides CP&L's reply to the Notice of Violation in accordance
I Gentlemen:
with the provisions
On July 23,
of 10 CFR 2.201.Also enclosed is a check payable to the Treasurer of the United States in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00).
: 1991, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a Notice of Violation (EA 91-076) for issues at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.
Please refer any questions regarding this submittal to Mr.S.D.Floyd at (919)546-6901.RAW/MGW Enclosures
Details of the NRC inspection are provided in Inspection Report No.. 50-400/91-15 dated July 23, 1991.
Yours very truly, Xc+C<Z/~B->>;-R.A.Watson cc: Mr.S.D.Ebneter Ms.B.L.Mozafari Mr.J.E.Tedrow gee((~9-9%8'<9 P<R 5diaoc, oo P~g Xv commission
Carolina Power
expires: g/pg/if'10S260104
& Light Company hereby responds to the Notice of Violation.
9i08fr'DR ADOCK 0=000400 0 PDR R.A.Watson, having been first duly sworn, did depose and say that the information
The enclosure to this letter provides CP&L's reply to the Notice of Violation in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201.
contained herein is true and correct to the best of his information, knowledge and belief;and the sources of his information
Also enclosed is a check payable to the Treasurer of the United States in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars
are officers, employees, contractors, and agents of Carolina Power&Light Company.s~s I I Notary (Seal)  
($50,000.00).
ENCLOSURE SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NRC DOCKET NO.50-400 OPERATING LICENSE NO.NPF-63 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION
Please refer any questions regarding this submittal to Mr. S.
OF CIVIL PENALTY VIOLATION A: Technical Specification
D. Floyd at (919) 546-6901.
3.3.1 requires that the Reactor Trip System shall have a minimum of two automatic trip instrumentation
RAW/MGW Enclosures Yours very truly, Xc+C<Z /~B ->>;-
channels operable when the Reactor Trip System breakers are closed and the Control Rod Drive System is capable of rod withdrawal.
R. A. Watson cc:
Contrary to the above, from May 18, 1991 until June 3, 1991, with the Reactor Trip System breakers closed and the Control Rod Drive System capable of rod withdrawal,'nly
Mr. S.
one automatic trip instrumentation
D. Ebneter Ms.
channel was operable because of a damaged undervoltage
B. L. Mozafari Mr. J.
output card on the other channel caused by improper maintenance
E. Tedrow gee(( ~9-9 %8'<9 P<R 5diaoc, oo P ~ g Xv commission expires:
activities.
g/pg/if'10S260104 9i08fr'DR ADOCK 0=000400 0
PDR R. A. Watson, having been first duly sworn, did depose and say that the information contained herein is true and correct to the best of his information, knowledge and belief; and the sources of his information are
: officers, employees, contractors, and agents of Carolina Power
& Light Company.
s
~
sI I
Notary (Seal)
 
ENCLOSURE SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NRC DOCKET NO. 50-400 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-63 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY VIOLATION A:
Technical Specification 3.3.1 requires that the Reactor Trip System shall have a minimum of two automatic trip instrumentation channels operable when the Reactor Trip System breakers are closed and the Control Rod Drive System is capable of rod withdrawal.
Contrary to the above, from May 18, 1991 until June 3,
1991, with the Reactor Trip System breakers closed and the Control Rod Drive System capable of rod withdrawal,'nly one automatic trip instrumentation channel was operable because of a damaged undervoltage output card on the other channel caused by improper maintenance activities.
Admission or Denial of the Violation:
Admission or Denial of the Violation:
CP&L admits to the violation.
CP&L admits to the violation.
Reason for Violation A: NRC IE Information
Reason for Violation A:
Notice 85-18, issued on March 7, 1985, provided information
NRC IE Information Notice 85-18, issued on March 7, 1985, provided information about potential Undervoltage (UV) driver output card damage caused by maintenance on the reactor trip breakers.
about potential Undervoltage (UV)driver output card damage caused by maintenance
This information was further detailed in Westinghouse Technical Bulletin*NSID-TB-85-16 issued July 31, 1985.
on the reactor trip breakers.This information
Westinghouse recommended that maintenance on the reactor trip breakers be performed. with the UV card pulled from its slot or that Solid State Protection System (SSPS) logic testing be performed after maintenance to verify operability.
was further detailed in Westinghouse
In addition, modified UV boards with a fusible link which prevent closure of the reactor trip breaker upon failure, were subsequently procured from Westinghouse.
Technical Bulletin*NSID-TB-85-16
In response to the Technical Bulletin and Information Notice, SHNPP indicated that it was not a good maintenance practice to remove SSPS boards.
issued July 31, 1985.Westinghouse
Removal of the boards was considered unnecessary since post maintenance testing was routinely performed after any plant maintenance to verify equipment operability.
recommended
On May 18, 1991, with the Reactor Coolant System at normal operating temperature and pressure, Reactor Trip Breaker A would not close in preparation for Hot Control Rod Drop Testing.
that maintenance
Investigation resulted in the replacement of the spring latch coil in the breaker and the manual control switch on the Main Control Board.
on the reactor trip breakers be performed.
It is believed that this maintenance performed on Reactor Trip Breaker A caused an inadvertent shorting to ground Page 1 of 4
with the UV card pulled from its slot or that Solid State Protection
 
System (SSPS)logic testing be performed after maintenance
of the UV card output.
to verify operability.
Troubleshooting involved disconnecting the primary and secondary contacts as the breaker was racked out on it's rails.
In addition, modified UV boards with a fusible link which prevent closure of the reactor trip breaker upon failure, were subsequently
Power was then provided to the closing coil (125 volts DC) and the undervoltage trip coil (48 volts DC) via jumpers from the cabinet terminal board to the appropriate breaker termination points. It is highly likely that shorting of the 48 volt power to ground occurred during installation or removal of these jumpers.
procured from Westinghouse.
This caused a short as described in Westinghouse Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.
In response to the Technical Bulletin and Information
Therefore, the UV card output remained high, preventing the passage of a reactor trip signal through SSPS Train A.
Notice, SHNPP indicated that it was not a good maintenance
Appropriate precautions were not added to Maintenance procedures used in troubleshooting or testing of the reactor trip breakers upon issuance of Westinghouse Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.
practice to remove SSPS boards.Removal of the boards was considered
The item was addressed by stating that post maintenance testing would verify SSPS operability.
unnecessary
In the situation on May 18,
since post maintenance
: 1991, Operations and Maintenance personnel made a
testing was routinely performed after any plant maintenance
conscious decision to eliminate the prescribed SSPS logic testing because they assumed that only the components downstream of the SSPS could have been 4 affected by the maintenance.
to verify equipment operability.
Train A of SSPS was last verified operable by the performance of MST-I0001 on May 16, 1991.
On May 18, 1991, with the Reactor Coolant System at normal operating temperature
Based on the assumption that the reactor trip breaker maintenance damaged the UV card on May 18, 1991, Train A of SSPS was unable to perform its automatic reactor trip safety function from May 18; 1991 to June 3,
and pressure, Reactor Trip Breaker A would not close in preparation
1991.
for Hot Control Rod Drop Testing.Investigation
Train B of SSPS was operable during this period to provide the redundant channel of reactor protection.
resulted in the replacement
The manual reactor trip function was also fully operable during this period.
of the spring latch coil in the breaker and the manual control switch on the Main Control Board.It is believed that this maintenance
VIOLATION B:
performed on Reactor Trip Breaker A caused an inadvertent
Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures-be established and implemented covering procedures outlined in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.
shorting to ground Page 1 of 4  
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Paragraphs l.j and 9 requires procedures for the control of electrical jumpers.
of the UV card output.Troubleshooting
Administrative Procedure AP-24, Temporary Bypass, Jumper and Wire Removal Control, Section 3.2.1, requires that maintenance personnel ensure that operations personnel are properly notified and appropriate parts of form AP-24-1 are completed prior to placement or removal of any electrical jumpers.
involved disconnecting
Plant Program Procedure PLP-400, Post-Maintenance
the primary and secondary contacts as the breaker was racked out on it's rails.Power was then provided to the closing coil (125 volts DC)and the undervoltage
: Testing, requires that appropriate testing be performed following the conduct of maintenance to verify affected equipment is capable of performing its intended function.
trip coil (48 volts DC)via jumpers from the cabinet terminal board to the appropriate
Contrary to the above, applicable maintenance procedures were not followed as evidenced by the following examples:
breaker termination
On May 18, 1991, during corrective maintenance activities associated with the train "A" reactor trip breaker and control switch replacement, the operations staff was not informed that electrical jumpers had been connected to the Reactor Trip System outputs and Form AP-24-1 was not Page 2 of 4
points.It is highly likely that shorting of the 48 volt power to ground occurred during installation
 
or removal of these jumpers.This caused a short as described in Westinghouse
2.
Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.Therefore, the UV card output remained high, preventing
completed to document the various electrical jumpers that were installed in the Reactor Trip System.
the passage of a reactor trip signal through SSPS Train A.Appropriate
On May 18, 1991, testing following corrective maintenance on the train "A" reactor trip breaker was not adequate to verify that Reactor Trip System solid state protection circuitry was capable of performing its intended function.
precautions
3.
were not added to Maintenance
On May 18, 1991, testing following corrective maintenance to replace a
procedures
manual trip switch for the Reactor Trip System was not adequate to test both the undervoltage and shunt trip functions for both trains.
used in troubleshooting
Admission or Denial of the Violation:
or testing of the reactor trip breakers upon issuance of Westinghouse
Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.
The item was addressed by stating that post maintenance
testing would verify SSPS operability.
In the situation on May 18, 1991, Operations
and Maintenance
personnel made a conscious decision to eliminate the prescribed
SSPS logic testing because they assumed that only the components
downstream
of the SSPS could have been 4 affected by the maintenance.
Train A of SSPS was last verified operable by the performance
of MST-I0001 on May 16, 1991.Based on the assumption
that the reactor trip breaker maintenance
damaged the UV card on May 18, 1991, Train A of SSPS was unable to perform its automatic reactor trip safety function from May 18;1991 to June 3, 1991.Train B of SSPS was operable during this period to provide the redundant channel of reactor protection.
The manual reactor trip function was also fully operable during this period.VIOLATION B: Technical Specification
6.8.1.a requires that written procedures-be
established
and implemented
covering procedures
outlined in Appendix A of Regulatory
Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Regulatory
Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Paragraphs
l.j and 9 requires procedures
for the control of electrical
jumpers.Administrative
Procedure AP-24, Temporary Bypass, Jumper and Wire Removal Control, Section 3.2.1, requires that maintenance
personnel ensure that operations
personnel are properly notified and appropriate
parts of form AP-24-1 are completed prior to placement or removal of any electrical
jumpers.Plant Program Procedure PLP-400, Post-Maintenance
Testing, requires that appropriate
testing be performed following the conduct of maintenance
to verify affected equipment is capable of performing
its intended function.Contrary to the above, applicable
maintenance
procedures
were not followed as evidenced by the following examples: On May 18, 1991, during corrective
maintenance
activities
associated
with the train"A" reactor trip breaker and control switch replacement, the operations
staff was not informed that electrical
jumpers had been connected to the Reactor Trip System outputs and Form AP-24-1 was not Page 2 of 4  
2.completed to document the various electrical
jumpers that were installed in the Reactor Trip System.On May 18, 1991, testing following corrective
maintenance
on the train"A" reactor trip breaker was not adequate to verify that Reactor Trip System solid state protection
circuitry was capable of performing
its intended function.3.On May 18, 1991, testing following corrective
maintenance
to replace a manual trip switch for the Reactor Trip System was not adequate to test both the undervoltage
and shunt trip functions for both trains.Admission or Denial of the Violation:
CP&L admits to the violation.
CP&L admits to the violation.
Reason for Violation B:Procedure AP-024 establishes
Reason for Violation B:
controls for use of temporary bypasses, jumpers, and wire removal control in the plant.As provided for in the scope of AP-024, lifted leads are exempted from the control of AP-024 when used for troubleshooting
Procedure AP-024 establishes controls for use of temporary bypasses,
Technical Specification
: jumpers, and wire removal control in the plant.
equipment that has been declared inoperable
As provided for in the scope of AP-024, lifted leads are exempted from the control of AP-024 when used for troubleshooting Technical Specification equipment that has been declared inoperable
-as long as the technician
- as long as the technician remains in the work area to maintain control of the lifted lead.
remains in the work area to maintain control of the lifted lead.Procedure AP-024 did not exclude jumpers when used for a similar purpose.However, plant practice did allow the usage of jumpers in the same manner as lifted leads during troubleshooting.
Procedure AP-024 did not exclude jumpers when used for a similar purpose.
Following maintenance
However, plant practice did allow the usage of jumpers in the same manner as lifted leads during troubleshooting.
on May 18, 1991, the post maintenance
Following maintenance on May 18,
testing of Reactor Trip Breaker A did not include SSPS logic testing.Personnel incorrectly
: 1991, the post maintenance testing of Reactor Trip Breaker A did not include SSPS logic testing.
determined
Personnel incorrectly determined that the logic testing was unnecessary since only the closing circuit had been repaired.
that the logic testing was unnecessary
The post maintenance testing verified that the close circuit problem was corrected but failed to detect the problem in the SSPS undervoltage output driver card.
since only the closing circuit had been repaired.The post maintenance
During the investigation of the maintenance performed on the Reactor Trip System, it was discovered that the reactor trip/close switch had not been adequately tested following replacement on May 18, 1991.
testing verified that the close circuit problem was corrected but failed to detect the problem in the SSPS undervoltage
The post maintenance test that was performed on the reactor trip/close switch verified that both reactor trip breakers opened and closed as the control switch was cycled.
output driver card.During the investigation
This is the normal post maintenance test used following control switch replacement.
of the maintenance
In this instance, it was not recognized that taking the switch to the "trip" position provided two independent open signals to the reactor trip breakers
performed on the Reactor Trip System, it was discovered
- the undervoltage trip and the shunt trip.
that the reactor trip/close
The testing performed was adequate to verify at least one of these signals functioned but was not adequate to verify that both the undervoltage and shunt trip signals functioned.
switch had not been adequately
Page 3 of 4
tested following replacement
 
on May 18, 1991.The post maintenance
Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved A&B The failed Train A UV driver card was replaced on June 4, 1991 with a new fused card as recommended by Westinghouse Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.
test that was performed on the reactor trip/close
The Train B UV driver card was previously replaced with a modified card on April 5, 1991.
switch verified that both reactor trip breakers opened and closed as the control switch was cycled.This is the normal post maintenance
Solid State Protection System logic testing was completed satisfactorily on each train following card replacement.
test used following control switch replacement.
The reactor trip/close switch was declared inoperable on June 6,
In this instance, it was not recognized
1991 and the reactor was shutdown on June 8,
that taking the switch to the"trip" position provided two independent
1991 for switch testing.
open signals to the reactor trip breakers-the undervoltage
The switch testing was completed with satisfactory results and the reactor was returned to power on June 9,
trip and the shunt trip.The testing performed was adequate to verify at least one of these signals functioned
1991.
but was not adequate to verify that both the undervoltage
Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid'urther Violations A&B The procedure on Temporary Bypass,
and shunt trip signals functioned.
: Jumper, and Wire Removal (AP-024) has been updated to state that the use of jumpers during troubleshooting is excluded from the scope of AP-024 provided that additional troubleshooting guidelines are followed.
Page 3 of 4  
An umbilical cord will be*manufactured to supply 125V DC for reactor trip breaker maintenance and troubleshooting.
Corrective
This umbilical cord will not connect to the 48V SSPS output.
Ste s Taken and Results Achieved A&B The failed Train A UV driver card was replaced on June 4, 1991 with a new fused card as recommended
A temporary 48V power supply will be used to supply a
by Westinghouse
simulated SSPS input signal for any future reactor trip breaker work.
Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.
Controls have been established to ensure that SSPS logic testing will be performed as part of the post-maintenance testing that follows any work on the reactor trip breakers.
The Train B UV driver card was previously
If testing the SSPS logic is determined unnecessary, it can be deleted only with the Manager
replaced with a modified card on April 5, 1991.Solid State Protection
- Operations approval.
System logic testing was completed satisfactorily
Appropriate site personnel involved in maintenance and modification work onsite have been sensitized to this event and the requirement that post-maintenance/post-modification testing be extensive enough to ensure no additional problems are created by the maintenance or modification activities.
on each train following card replacement.
Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved A&B Full compliance is pending the manufacturing of the umbilical cord for reactor trip breaker maintenance and troubleshooting as stated above.
The reactor trip/close
This action will be completed*by September 30, 1991.
switch was declared inoperable
Page 4 of 4}}
on June 6, 1991 and the reactor was shutdown on June 8, 1991 for switch testing.The switch testing was completed with satisfactory
results and the reactor was returned to power on June 9, 1991.Corrective
Ste s Taken to Avoid'urther
Violations
A&B The procedure on Temporary Bypass, Jumper, and Wire Removal (AP-024)has been updated to state that the use of jumpers during troubleshooting
is excluded from the scope of AP-024 provided that additional
troubleshooting
guidelines
are followed.An umbilical cord will be*manufactured
to supply 125V DC for reactor trip breaker maintenance
and troubleshooting.
This umbilical cord will not connect to the 48V SSPS output.A temporary 48V power supply will be used to supply a simulated SSPS input signal for any future reactor trip breaker work.Controls have been established
to ensure that SSPS logic testing will be performed as part of the post-maintenance
testing that follows any work on the reactor trip breakers.If testing the SSPS logic is determined
unnecessary, it can be deleted only with the Manager-Operations
approval.Appropriate
site personnel involved in maintenance
and modification
work onsite have been sensitized
to this event and the requirement
that post-maintenance/post-modification
testing be extensive enough to ensure no additional
problems are created by the maintenance
or modification
activities.
Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved A&B Full compliance
is pending the manufacturing
of the umbilical cord for reactor trip breaker maintenance
and troubleshooting
as stated above.This action will be completed*by
September 30, 1991.Page 4 of 4
}}

Latest revision as of 06:47, 7 January 2025

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/91-15.Corrective Actions:Procedure on Temporary Bypass,Jumper & Wire Removal Updated to State Use of Jumpers During Troubleshooting Is Excluded from Scope of AP-024
ML18010A369
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/16/1991
From: Watson R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NLS-91-212, NUDOCS 9108260104
Download: ML18010A369 (7)


Text

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTPATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ESSION NBR:9108260104 DOC.DATE: 91/08/16 NOTARIZED: YES FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION WATSON,R.A.

Carolina Power 6 Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

DOCKET 05000400 R

SUBJECT:

Responds to NRC 910723 ltr re violations noted in insp rept 50-400/91-15.Corrective actions:Procedure on Temporary Bypass, Jumper

& Wire removal updated to state use of gumpers during troubleshooting is excluded from scope of AP-024.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE14D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR

]

ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: Enforcement Action Non-2.790-Licensee

Response

NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed.

05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 LA MOZAFARI,B.

INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA DEDRO NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE DIE

~5EG~Z-.LE'2 RGN2/DRSS/EPRPB EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIP1ENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 PD AEOD/DSP/TPAB NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OE FILE 01 RGN2 FILE 03 NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 D

D D

NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

D D

PLEASE HELP US TO RFDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl.-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 16 ENCL 16

0

COAL Carolina Power & Ltgkt Company P. O. Box 1551

~ Raleigh. N. C. 27602 R. A. WATSON Senicr Vice Prestrtent Nuclear Generation SERIAL:

NLS-91-212 10 CFR 2.201 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTENTION: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-400/LICENSE NO. NPF-63 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION (EA 91-076)

I Gentlemen:

On July 23,

1991, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a Notice of Violation (EA 91-076) for issues at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.

Details of the NRC inspection are provided in Inspection Report No.. 50-400/91-15 dated July 23, 1991.

Carolina Power

& Light Company hereby responds to the Notice of Violation.

The enclosure to this letter provides CP&L's reply to the Notice of Violation in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201.

Also enclosed is a check payable to the Treasurer of the United States in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars

($50,000.00).

Please refer any questions regarding this submittal to Mr. S.

D. Floyd at (919) 546-6901.

RAW/MGW Enclosures Yours very truly, Xc+C<Z /~B ->>;-

R. A. Watson cc:

Mr. S.

D. Ebneter Ms.

B. L. Mozafari Mr. J.

E. Tedrow gee(( ~9-9 %8'<9 P<R 5diaoc, oo P ~ g Xv commission expires:

g/pg/if'10S260104 9i08fr'DR ADOCK 0=000400 0

PDR R. A. Watson, having been first duly sworn, did depose and say that the information contained herein is true and correct to the best of his information, knowledge and belief; and the sources of his information are

officers, employees, contractors, and agents of Carolina Power

& Light Company.

s

~

sI I

Notary (Seal)

ENCLOSURE SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NRC DOCKET NO. 50-400 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-63 REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY VIOLATION A:

Technical Specification 3.3.1 requires that the Reactor Trip System shall have a minimum of two automatic trip instrumentation channels operable when the Reactor Trip System breakers are closed and the Control Rod Drive System is capable of rod withdrawal.

Contrary to the above, from May 18, 1991 until June 3,

1991, with the Reactor Trip System breakers closed and the Control Rod Drive System capable of rod withdrawal,'nly one automatic trip instrumentation channel was operable because of a damaged undervoltage output card on the other channel caused by improper maintenance activities.

Admission or Denial of the Violation:

CP&L admits to the violation.

Reason for Violation A:

NRC IE Information Notice 85-18, issued on March 7, 1985, provided information about potential Undervoltage (UV) driver output card damage caused by maintenance on the reactor trip breakers.

This information was further detailed in Westinghouse Technical Bulletin*NSID-TB-85-16 issued July 31, 1985.

Westinghouse recommended that maintenance on the reactor trip breakers be performed. with the UV card pulled from its slot or that Solid State Protection System (SSPS) logic testing be performed after maintenance to verify operability.

In addition, modified UV boards with a fusible link which prevent closure of the reactor trip breaker upon failure, were subsequently procured from Westinghouse.

In response to the Technical Bulletin and Information Notice, SHNPP indicated that it was not a good maintenance practice to remove SSPS boards.

Removal of the boards was considered unnecessary since post maintenance testing was routinely performed after any plant maintenance to verify equipment operability.

On May 18, 1991, with the Reactor Coolant System at normal operating temperature and pressure, Reactor Trip Breaker A would not close in preparation for Hot Control Rod Drop Testing.

Investigation resulted in the replacement of the spring latch coil in the breaker and the manual control switch on the Main Control Board.

It is believed that this maintenance performed on Reactor Trip Breaker A caused an inadvertent shorting to ground Page 1 of 4

of the UV card output.

Troubleshooting involved disconnecting the primary and secondary contacts as the breaker was racked out on it's rails.

Power was then provided to the closing coil (125 volts DC) and the undervoltage trip coil (48 volts DC) via jumpers from the cabinet terminal board to the appropriate breaker termination points. It is highly likely that shorting of the 48 volt power to ground occurred during installation or removal of these jumpers.

This caused a short as described in Westinghouse Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.

Therefore, the UV card output remained high, preventing the passage of a reactor trip signal through SSPS Train A.

Appropriate precautions were not added to Maintenance procedures used in troubleshooting or testing of the reactor trip breakers upon issuance of Westinghouse Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.

The item was addressed by stating that post maintenance testing would verify SSPS operability.

In the situation on May 18,

1991, Operations and Maintenance personnel made a

conscious decision to eliminate the prescribed SSPS logic testing because they assumed that only the components downstream of the SSPS could have been 4 affected by the maintenance.

Train A of SSPS was last verified operable by the performance of MST-I0001 on May 16, 1991.

Based on the assumption that the reactor trip breaker maintenance damaged the UV card on May 18, 1991, Train A of SSPS was unable to perform its automatic reactor trip safety function from May 18; 1991 to June 3,

1991.

Train B of SSPS was operable during this period to provide the redundant channel of reactor protection.

The manual reactor trip function was also fully operable during this period.

VIOLATION B:

Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures-be established and implemented covering procedures outlined in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.

Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Paragraphs l.j and 9 requires procedures for the control of electrical jumpers.

Administrative Procedure AP-24, Temporary Bypass, Jumper and Wire Removal Control, Section 3.2.1, requires that maintenance personnel ensure that operations personnel are properly notified and appropriate parts of form AP-24-1 are completed prior to placement or removal of any electrical jumpers.

Plant Program Procedure PLP-400, Post-Maintenance

Testing, requires that appropriate testing be performed following the conduct of maintenance to verify affected equipment is capable of performing its intended function.

Contrary to the above, applicable maintenance procedures were not followed as evidenced by the following examples:

On May 18, 1991, during corrective maintenance activities associated with the train "A" reactor trip breaker and control switch replacement, the operations staff was not informed that electrical jumpers had been connected to the Reactor Trip System outputs and Form AP-24-1 was not Page 2 of 4

2.

completed to document the various electrical jumpers that were installed in the Reactor Trip System.

On May 18, 1991, testing following corrective maintenance on the train "A" reactor trip breaker was not adequate to verify that Reactor Trip System solid state protection circuitry was capable of performing its intended function.

3.

On May 18, 1991, testing following corrective maintenance to replace a

manual trip switch for the Reactor Trip System was not adequate to test both the undervoltage and shunt trip functions for both trains.

Admission or Denial of the Violation:

CP&L admits to the violation.

Reason for Violation B:

Procedure AP-024 establishes controls for use of temporary bypasses,

jumpers, and wire removal control in the plant.

As provided for in the scope of AP-024, lifted leads are exempted from the control of AP-024 when used for troubleshooting Technical Specification equipment that has been declared inoperable

- as long as the technician remains in the work area to maintain control of the lifted lead.

Procedure AP-024 did not exclude jumpers when used for a similar purpose.

However, plant practice did allow the usage of jumpers in the same manner as lifted leads during troubleshooting.

Following maintenance on May 18,

1991, the post maintenance testing of Reactor Trip Breaker A did not include SSPS logic testing.

Personnel incorrectly determined that the logic testing was unnecessary since only the closing circuit had been repaired.

The post maintenance testing verified that the close circuit problem was corrected but failed to detect the problem in the SSPS undervoltage output driver card.

During the investigation of the maintenance performed on the Reactor Trip System, it was discovered that the reactor trip/close switch had not been adequately tested following replacement on May 18, 1991.

The post maintenance test that was performed on the reactor trip/close switch verified that both reactor trip breakers opened and closed as the control switch was cycled.

This is the normal post maintenance test used following control switch replacement.

In this instance, it was not recognized that taking the switch to the "trip" position provided two independent open signals to the reactor trip breakers

- the undervoltage trip and the shunt trip.

The testing performed was adequate to verify at least one of these signals functioned but was not adequate to verify that both the undervoltage and shunt trip signals functioned.

Page 3 of 4

Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved A&B The failed Train A UV driver card was replaced on June 4, 1991 with a new fused card as recommended by Westinghouse Technical Bulletin NSID-TB-85-16.

The Train B UV driver card was previously replaced with a modified card on April 5, 1991.

Solid State Protection System logic testing was completed satisfactorily on each train following card replacement.

The reactor trip/close switch was declared inoperable on June 6,

1991 and the reactor was shutdown on June 8,

1991 for switch testing.

The switch testing was completed with satisfactory results and the reactor was returned to power on June 9,

1991.

Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid'urther Violations A&B The procedure on Temporary Bypass,

Jumper, and Wire Removal (AP-024) has been updated to state that the use of jumpers during troubleshooting is excluded from the scope of AP-024 provided that additional troubleshooting guidelines are followed.

An umbilical cord will be*manufactured to supply 125V DC for reactor trip breaker maintenance and troubleshooting.

This umbilical cord will not connect to the 48V SSPS output.

A temporary 48V power supply will be used to supply a

simulated SSPS input signal for any future reactor trip breaker work.

Controls have been established to ensure that SSPS logic testing will be performed as part of the post-maintenance testing that follows any work on the reactor trip breakers.

If testing the SSPS logic is determined unnecessary, it can be deleted only with the Manager

- Operations approval.

Appropriate site personnel involved in maintenance and modification work onsite have been sensitized to this event and the requirement that post-maintenance/post-modification testing be extensive enough to ensure no additional problems are created by the maintenance or modification activities.

Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved A&B Full compliance is pending the manufacturing of the umbilical cord for reactor trip breaker maintenance and troubleshooting as stated above.

This action will be completed*by September 30, 1991.

Page 4 of 4