ML18057A257: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18057A257
| number = ML18057A257
| issue date = 06/08/1990
| issue date = 06/08/1990
| title = Responds to NRC 900509 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/90-12.Corrective Actions:Continuing Training Program Will Be Developed for Supervisors That Will Discuss Fire Protection Program Implementation Topics
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/90-12.Corrective Actions:Continuing Training Program Will Be Developed for Supervisors That Will Discuss Fire Protection Program Implementation Topics
| author name = BERRY K W
| author name = Berry K
| author affiliation = CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.),
| author affiliation = CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.),
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 9006130246
| document report number = NUDOCS 9006130246
| title reference date = 05-09-1990
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000255/1990012]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:consumers  
{{#Wiki_filter:consumers Power POW ERi Nii MICHlliAN'S PRDliRESS General Offices:
Power POW ERi Nii MICHlliAN'S  
1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 8, 1990 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT -
PRDliRESS  
RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 90012; NOTICE OF VIOLATION Kenneth W Berry Director Nuclear Licensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Report 90012, dated May 9, 1990 documented the results of a routine safety inspection and resulted in issuance of a violation for inadequate implementation of Site Fire Protection Program procedures.
General Offices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 8, 1990 Nuclear Regulatory  
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.201, our response to the identified examples of noncompliance follows:
Commission  
VIOLATION 50-255/90012-04(DRP):
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 -LICENSE DPR-20 -PALISADES  
Technical Specification 6.8.1.f requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained for activities that are associated with the Site Fire Protection Program.
PLANT -RESPONSE TO INSPECTION  
Fire Protection Implementing Procedure No 7 (FPIP-7), "Fire Prevention Activities", Paragraph 6.3.3.b, requires that properly labeled safety cans equipped with flame arrestors and spring actuated caps shall be used for storage and handling of all Class 1 liquids.
REPORT 90012; NOTICE OF VIOLATION  
Contrary to the above, on March 22, 1990 the inspector identified several instances where Class 1 flammable liquids were stored in a locker without use of the required safety cans.
Kenneth W Berry Director Nuclear Licensing  
In addition, on April 17, 1990 the inspector observed use of a Class 1 liquid that was not in an approved safety can during floor coating activities.
Nuclear Regulatory  
REASON FOR VIOLATION In response to Branch Tech~ical Position APCSB 9.5-1, Appendix A, "Guidelines for Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants Docketed prior to July 1, 1976",
Commission (NRC) Inspection  
Palisades committed to comply with National Fire Protection Association Standard 30 (NFPA-30), "Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code''.
Report 90012, dated May 9, 1990 documented  
The guidelines of NFPA-30 are reflected in our Site Fire Protection Program, and are implemented, in part, through Fire Protection Program Implementing Procedures (FPIPs).
the results of a routine safety inspection  
Our administrative method for ensuring compliance with the NFPA~30 guidelines for storage and handling of Class 1 flammable liquids is directed under Fire Protection Program Implementing Procedure No 7 (FPIP-7), "Fire Prevention Activities".
and resulted in issuance of a violation  
OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01 90(1~.130241'-.
for inadequate  
F'DR A:OOCK G!
implementation  
90060:3 050002!55 F'DC A GW5 ENERGY COMPANY
of Site Fire Protection  
 
Program procedures.  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Palisades Plant Response to IR 90012 June 8, 1990 2
In accordance  
NRC Inspection Report 255/90012 identified three examples whereby Class 1 flammable liquids were not stored or handled in accordance with FPIP-7.
with 10 CFR 2.201, our response to the identified  
In two of the examples, Class 1 flammable liquids were not stored in safety cans equipped with flame arrestors and spring actuated caps.
examples of noncompliance  
At the time when these examples were identified, FPIP-7, Paragraph 6.3.3.b, stated that safety cans equipped with flame arrestors and spring actuated caps shall be used for storage and handling of all Class 1 flammable liquids.
follows: VIOLATION  
In the other example, a storage locker was found to contain more than one bottle each of three Class 1 flammable liquids.
50-255/90012-04(DRP):  
These bottles ranged in capacity from one quart to one gallon.
Technical  
At the time when this example was identified, FPIP-7, Paragraph 6.3.3.a stated that, "storage of flammable/combustible liquids should always be maintained at the lowest practical level".
Specification  
The administrative requirements for storage and handling of Class 1 flammable liquids contained in FPIP-7 are considerably more stringent than the NFPA-30 guidelines which we committed to in response to Branch Technical Position APCSB 9.5-1.
6.8.1.f requires that written procedures  
Although FPIP-7 requires that all Class 1 flammable liquids shall be stored in safety cans equipped with flame arrestors and spring actuated caps, NFPA-30 allows small quantities of these liquids to be stored in other types of containers.
shall be established, implemented  
When we implemented the stricter storage and handling requirements of FPIP-7 our intent was to simplify field implemen-tation of the NFPA-30 guidelines.
and maintained  
It was also intended that alternate, NFPA-30 allowable provisions for storing and handling Class 1.flammable liquids would be allowed on a case by case basis in situations where the liquid could not be reasonably stored in a safety can.
for activities  
As an example, some Class 1 flammable liquids, such as paints, epoxies, and laboratory reagents cannot be reasonably stored in safety cans due to either viscosity or purity considerations.
that are associated  
An evaluation was performed for each the three examples described above.
with the Site Fire Protection  
It was determined that the two examples which involved Class 1 flammable liquids that were not stored in safety cans did not comply with the requirements of procedure FPIP-7.
Program. Fire Protection  
However, in each of these examples it was also determined that both the storage containers and the storage quantities involved were will within the guidelines of NFPA-30.
Implementing  
With respect to the example involving storage of more than one bottle each of several Class 1 flammable liquids, although the results of efforts made to limit storage of flammable liquids to the lowest practical quantity did not strictly comply with FPIP-7, the stored quantities and method of storage were found to be well within NFPA-30 guidelines.
Procedure  
We concur with the NRC evaluation of the identified deficiencies as examples of noncompliance with the requirement to implement Site Fire Protection Program procedures.
No 7 (FPIP-7), "Fire Prevention  
CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN ANP RESULTS ACHIEVED The three examples cited in this violation were evaluated to determine their effect on Site Fire Protection Program compliance with NFPA-30 guidelines.
Activities", Paragraph  
The results of this evaluation indicate that each of the examples was within NFPA-30 guidelines, and that no additional actions were necessary in order to achieve Site Fire Protection Program compliance with these guidelines.
6.3.3.b, requires that properly labeled safety cans equipped with flame arrestors  
Additionally, a Plant walkdown of combustible material storage lockers was performed and excess materials were removed.
and spring actuated caps shall be used for storage and handling of all Class 1 liquids. Contrary to the above, on March 22, 1990 the inspector  
identified  
several instances  
where Class 1 flammable  
liquids were stored in a locker without use of the required safety cans. In addition, on April 17, 1990 the inspector  
observed use of a Class 1 liquid that was not in an approved safety can during floor coating activities.  
REASON FOR VIOLATION  
In response to Branch  
Position APCSB 9.5-1, Appendix A, "Guidelines  
for Fire Protection  
for Nuclear Power Plants Docketed prior to July 1, 1976", Palisades  
committed  
to comply with National Fire Protection  
Association  
Standard 30 (NFPA-30), "Flammable  
and Combustible  
Liquids Code''. The guidelines  
of NFPA-30 are reflected  
in our Site Fire Protection  
Program, and are implemented, in part, through Fire Protection  
Program Implementing  
Procedures (FPIPs). Our administrative  
method for ensuring compliance  
with the  
guidelines  
for storage and handling of Class 1 flammable  
liquids is directed under Fire Protection  
Program Implementing  
Procedure  
No 7 (FPIP-7), "Fire Prevention  
Activities".  
OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01  
OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01  
F'DR A:OOCK G! 90060:3 050002!55
 
F'DC A GW5 ENERGY COMPANY 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Palisades Plant Response to IR 90012 June 8, 1990 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER NON-COMPLIANCE 3
Nuclear Regulatory
A continuing training program will be developed for utility and contractor supervisors that will discuss Fire Protection Program implementation topics.
Commission
Additionally, FPIP-7 has been revised to more adequately reflect the storage quantity and container guidelines of NFPA-30, and to make procedure compliance more understandable.
Palisades
DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED The Fire Protection Program procedure implementation deficiencies identified in NRC Inspection Report 255/90012 did not result in a lack of compliance with NFPA-30 Guidelines or a deviation from our commitment to satisfy these guidelines.
Plant Response to IR 90012 June 8, 1990 2 NRC Inspection
Procedure FPIP-7 has been revised to correct deficiencies and make procedure implementation and compliance more understandable.
Report 255/90012
It is expected that the continuing training program will be developed and that this training will be provided by November 30, 1990.
identified
Kenneth W Berry Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01}}
three examples whereby Class 1 flammable
liquids were not stored or handled in accordance
with FPIP-7. In two of the examples, Class 1 flammable
liquids were not stored in safety cans equipped with flame arrestors
and spring actuated caps. At the time when these examples were identified, FPIP-7, Paragraph
6.3.3.b, stated that safety cans equipped with flame arrestors
and spring actuated caps shall be used for storage and handling of all Class 1 flammable
liquids. In the other example, a storage locker was found to contain more than one bottle each of three Class 1 flammable
liquids. These bottles ranged in capacity from one quart to one gallon. At the time when this example was identified, FPIP-7, Paragraph
6.3.3.a stated that, "storage of flammable/combustible
liquids should always be maintained
at the lowest practical
level". The administrative
requirements
for storage and handling of Class 1 flammable
liquids contained
in FPIP-7 are considerably
more stringent
than the NFPA-30 guidelines
which we committed
to in response to Branch Technical
Position APCSB 9.5-1. Although FPIP-7 requires that all Class 1 flammable
liquids shall be stored in safety cans equipped with flame arrestors
and spring actuated caps, NFPA-30 allows small quantities
of these liquids to be stored in other types of containers.
When we implemented
the stricter storage and handling requirements
of FPIP-7 our intent was to simplify field tation of the NFPA-30 guidelines.
It was also intended that alternate, NFPA-30 allowable
provisions
for storing and handling Class 1.flammable
liquids would be allowed on a case by case basis in situations
where the liquid could not be reasonably
stored in a safety can. As an example, some Class 1 flammable
liquids, such as paints, epoxies, and laboratory
reagents cannot be reasonably
stored in safety cans due to either viscosity
or purity considerations.
An evaluation
was performed
for each the three examples described
above. It was determined
that the two examples which involved Class 1 flammable
liquids that were not stored in safety cans did not comply with the requirements
of procedure
FPIP-7. However, in each of these examples it was also determined
that both the storage containers
and the storage quantities
involved were will within the guidelines
of NFPA-30. With respect to the example involving
storage of more than one bottle each of several Class 1 flammable
liquids, although the results of efforts made to limit storage of flammable
liquids to the lowest practical
quantity did not strictly comply with FPIP-7, the stored quantities
and method of storage were found to be well within NFPA-30 guidelines.
We concur with the NRC evaluation
of the identified
deficiencies
as examples of noncompliance
with the requirement
to implement
Site Fire Protection
Program procedures.
CORRECTIVE
ACTION TAKEN ANP RESULTS ACHIEVED The three examples cited in this violation
were evaluated
to determine
their effect on Site Fire Protection
Program compliance
with NFPA-30 guidelines.
The results of this evaluation
indicate that each of the examples was within NFPA-30 guidelines, and that no additional
actions were necessary
in order to achieve Site Fire Protection
Program compliance
with these guidelines.
Additionally, a Plant walkdown of combustible
material storage lockers was performed
and excess materials
were removed. OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01 
,, * Nuclear Regulatory  
Commission  
Palisades  
Plant Response to IR 90012 June 8, 1990 CORRECTIVE  
ACTIONS TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER NON-COMPLIANCE  
3 A continuing  
training program will be developed  
for utility and contractor  
supervisors  
that will discuss Fire Protection  
Program implementation  
topics. Additionally, FPIP-7 has been revised to more adequately  
reflect the storage quantity and container  
guidelines  
of NFPA-30, and to make procedure  
compliance  
more understandable.  
DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE  
WILL BE ACHIEVED The Fire Protection  
Program procedure  
implementation  
deficiencies  
identified  
in NRC Inspection  
Report 255/90012  
did not result in a lack of compliance  
with NFPA-30 Guidelines  
or a deviation  
from our commitment  
to satisfy these guidelines.  
Procedure  
FPIP-7 has been revised to correct deficiencies  
and make procedure  
implementation  
and compliance  
more understandable.  
It is expected that the continuing  
training program will be developed  
and that this training will be provided by November 30, 1990. Kenneth W Berry Director, Nuclear Licensing  
CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector  
-Palisades  
OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01
}}

Latest revision as of 09:03, 6 January 2025

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-255/90-12.Corrective Actions:Continuing Training Program Will Be Developed for Supervisors That Will Discuss Fire Protection Program Implementation Topics
ML18057A257
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/1990
From: Berry K
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9006130246
Download: ML18057A257 (3)


Text

consumers Power POW ERi Nii MICHlliAN'S PRDliRESS General Offices:

1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-1636 June 8, 1990 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT -

RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 90012; NOTICE OF VIOLATION Kenneth W Berry Director Nuclear Licensing Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Report 90012, dated May 9, 1990 documented the results of a routine safety inspection and resulted in issuance of a violation for inadequate implementation of Site Fire Protection Program procedures.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.201, our response to the identified examples of noncompliance follows:

VIOLATION 50-255/90012-04(DRP):

Technical Specification 6.8.1.f requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained for activities that are associated with the Site Fire Protection Program.

Fire Protection Implementing Procedure No 7 (FPIP-7), "Fire Prevention Activities", Paragraph 6.3.3.b, requires that properly labeled safety cans equipped with flame arrestors and spring actuated caps shall be used for storage and handling of all Class 1 liquids.

Contrary to the above, on March 22, 1990 the inspector identified several instances where Class 1 flammable liquids were stored in a locker without use of the required safety cans.

In addition, on April 17, 1990 the inspector observed use of a Class 1 liquid that was not in an approved safety can during floor coating activities.

REASON FOR VIOLATION In response to Branch Tech~ical Position APCSB 9.5-1, Appendix A, "Guidelines for Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants Docketed prior to July 1, 1976",

Palisades committed to comply with National Fire Protection Association Standard 30 (NFPA-30), "Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code.

The guidelines of NFPA-30 are reflected in our Site Fire Protection Program, and are implemented, in part, through Fire Protection Program Implementing Procedures (FPIPs).

Our administrative method for ensuring compliance with the NFPA~30 guidelines for storage and handling of Class 1 flammable liquids is directed under Fire Protection Program Implementing Procedure No 7 (FPIP-7), "Fire Prevention Activities".

OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01 90(1~.130241'-.

F'DR A:OOCK G!

90060:3 050002!55 F'DC A GW5 ENERGY COMPANY

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Palisades Plant Response to IR 90012 June 8, 1990 2

NRC Inspection Report 255/90012 identified three examples whereby Class 1 flammable liquids were not stored or handled in accordance with FPIP-7.

In two of the examples, Class 1 flammable liquids were not stored in safety cans equipped with flame arrestors and spring actuated caps.

At the time when these examples were identified, FPIP-7, Paragraph 6.3.3.b, stated that safety cans equipped with flame arrestors and spring actuated caps shall be used for storage and handling of all Class 1 flammable liquids.

In the other example, a storage locker was found to contain more than one bottle each of three Class 1 flammable liquids.

These bottles ranged in capacity from one quart to one gallon.

At the time when this example was identified, FPIP-7, Paragraph 6.3.3.a stated that, "storage of flammable/combustible liquids should always be maintained at the lowest practical level".

The administrative requirements for storage and handling of Class 1 flammable liquids contained in FPIP-7 are considerably more stringent than the NFPA-30 guidelines which we committed to in response to Branch Technical Position APCSB 9.5-1.

Although FPIP-7 requires that all Class 1 flammable liquids shall be stored in safety cans equipped with flame arrestors and spring actuated caps, NFPA-30 allows small quantities of these liquids to be stored in other types of containers.

When we implemented the stricter storage and handling requirements of FPIP-7 our intent was to simplify field implemen-tation of the NFPA-30 guidelines.

It was also intended that alternate, NFPA-30 allowable provisions for storing and handling Class 1.flammable liquids would be allowed on a case by case basis in situations where the liquid could not be reasonably stored in a safety can.

As an example, some Class 1 flammable liquids, such as paints, epoxies, and laboratory reagents cannot be reasonably stored in safety cans due to either viscosity or purity considerations.

An evaluation was performed for each the three examples described above.

It was determined that the two examples which involved Class 1 flammable liquids that were not stored in safety cans did not comply with the requirements of procedure FPIP-7.

However, in each of these examples it was also determined that both the storage containers and the storage quantities involved were will within the guidelines of NFPA-30.

With respect to the example involving storage of more than one bottle each of several Class 1 flammable liquids, although the results of efforts made to limit storage of flammable liquids to the lowest practical quantity did not strictly comply with FPIP-7, the stored quantities and method of storage were found to be well within NFPA-30 guidelines.

We concur with the NRC evaluation of the identified deficiencies as examples of noncompliance with the requirement to implement Site Fire Protection Program procedures.

CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN ANP RESULTS ACHIEVED The three examples cited in this violation were evaluated to determine their effect on Site Fire Protection Program compliance with NFPA-30 guidelines.

The results of this evaluation indicate that each of the examples was within NFPA-30 guidelines, and that no additional actions were necessary in order to achieve Site Fire Protection Program compliance with these guidelines.

Additionally, a Plant walkdown of combustible material storage lockers was performed and excess materials were removed.

OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Palisades Plant Response to IR 90012 June 8, 1990 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER NON-COMPLIANCE 3

A continuing training program will be developed for utility and contractor supervisors that will discuss Fire Protection Program implementation topics.

Additionally, FPIP-7 has been revised to more adequately reflect the storage quantity and container guidelines of NFPA-30, and to make procedure compliance more understandable.

DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED The Fire Protection Program procedure implementation deficiencies identified in NRC Inspection Report 255/90012 did not result in a lack of compliance with NFPA-30 Guidelines or a deviation from our commitment to satisfy these guidelines.

Procedure FPIP-7 has been revised to correct deficiencies and make procedure implementation and compliance more understandable.

It is expected that the continuing training program will be developed and that this training will be provided by November 30, 1990.

Kenneth W Berry Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades OC0690-0037-NL04-LI01