ML073100534: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML073100534
| number = ML073100534
| issue date = 10/08/2007
| issue date = 10/08/2007
| title = 2007/10/08 - Comment (63) Regarding Iplr Scoping
| title = Comment (63) Regarding Iplr Scoping
| author name = Public Commenter
| author name = Public Commenter
| author affiliation = Public Commenter
| author affiliation = Public Commenter
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: <escher@waterkeeper.org>
{{#Wiki_filter:From:  
To:   <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> Date:   10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM
<escher@waterkeeper.org>
To:  
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date:
10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point EIS Comments
Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham  
 
Bo Pham  


==Dear Bo Pham,==
==Dear Bo Pham,==
Indian Point is a dangerous and badly run power plant. It will take courage on the part of public officials and decision-makers like yourself to take a real look at the risks and dangers of operating this nuclear plant in such a populated place. But I urge you to do so.
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
Sincerely, Eddie Scher 84 Bellewood Ave Suite 100


Indian Point is a dangerous and badly run power plant. It will
Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522


take courage on the part of public officials and decision-makers like yourself to take a real look at the risks and dangers of operating this nuclear plant in such a populated place. But I
Federal Register Notice:
 
72FR45075 Comment Number:
urge you to do so.
63 Mail Envelope Properties (47306FAE.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000001.1.1514C0.1)  
 
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 
address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact St atement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:
 
1: the impacts of a terrorist a ttack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reserv oir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents;
 
2: the impacts of Indian Poin t's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies;
 
3: the build-up of high-level r adioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks or iginating from at least two spent fuel pools;
 
4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a
 
combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
 
Sincerely, Eddie Scher
 
84 Bellewood Ave
 
Suite 100 Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522
 
Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number:   63   Mail Envelope Properties   (47306FAE.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000001.1.1514C0.1)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:   10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM From:   <escher@waterkeeper.org>
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:
Created By:   escher@waterkeeper.org  
10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM From:  
 
<escher@waterkeeper.org>
Recipients    <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>  
Created By:
 
escher@waterkeeper.org Recipients
Post Office       Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01       nrc.gov
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
 
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1371 10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM Mime.822 2210 11/6/2007 1:44:14 PM Options Priority:
Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1371     10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM Mime.822   2210     11/6/2007 1:44:14 PM Options Priority:     Standard   Reply Requested:   No   Return Notification:   None     None  
Standard Reply Requested:
 
No Return Notification:
Concealed  
None None Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:     Standard}}
No Security:
Standard}}

Latest revision as of 20:35, 14 January 2025

Comment (63) Regarding Iplr Scoping
ML073100534
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/08/2007
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
72FR45075
Download: ML073100534 (3)


Text

From:

<escher@waterkeeper.org>

To:

<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Date:

10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham

Dear Bo Pham,

Indian Point is a dangerous and badly run power plant. It will take courage on the part of public officials and decision-makers like yourself to take a real look at the risks and dangers of operating this nuclear plant in such a populated place. But I urge you to do so.

I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:

1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),

conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.

Sincerely, Eddie Scher 84 Bellewood Ave Suite 100

Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522

Federal Register Notice:

72FR45075 Comment Number:

63 Mail Envelope Properties (47306FAE.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000001.1.1514C0.1)

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:

10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM From:

<escher@waterkeeper.org>

Created By:

escher@waterkeeper.org Recipients

<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1371 10/8/2007 11:41:52 AM Mime.822 2210 11/6/2007 1:44:14 PM Options Priority:

Standard Reply Requested:

No Return Notification:

None None Concealed

Subject:

No Security:

Standard