ML103620556: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML103620556 | | number = ML103620556 | ||
| issue date = 12/28/2010 | | issue date = 12/28/2010 | ||
| title = | | title = Request for Additional Information, Relief Request RR-ENG-3-02 | ||
| author name = Thadani M | | author name = Thadani M | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV | ||
| addressee name = Harrison A, Walker P | | addressee name = Harrison A, Walker P | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | {{#Wiki_filter:REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 3RD 10-YEAR INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST RR-ENG-3-02 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 STP NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY DOCKET NUMBERS 50-498 AND 50-499 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided by STP Nuclear Operating Company for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2, in its {{letter dated|date=September 20, 2010|text=letter dated September 20, 2010}}, and has determined that additional information is necessary to complete the review of Relief Request RR-ENG-3-02. Based on the staff=s review, please address the following questions. | ||
: 1. Please provide the start and end dates of the third 10-year inservice inspection interval for STP Units 1 and 2. | |||
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided by STP Nuclear Operating Company for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2, in its letter dated September 20, 2010, and has determined that additional information is necessary to complete the review of Relief Request RR-ENG-3-02. Based on the staff | : 2. Section E of RR-ENG-3-02 states that the straight beam ultrasonic examination procedure has been demonstrated to ensure examination adequacy. Please provide a detailed description of this demonstration, including mockups/samples used, method(s) demonstrated, and results. | ||
=s review, please address the following questions. | : 3. What flaws are expected in these components? Unless addressed in response to question 2 above, please address whether the mockups used in the demonstration of the UT technique contained flaws representative of those found inservice. | ||
: 1. Please provide the start and end dates of the third 10-year inservice inspection interval for STP Units 1 and 2. | : 4. The illustration of the Roto-lok flange insert provided in RR-ENG-3-02 is not sufficient for understanding the Code-required examination surface as well as what is going to be examined with UT in lieu of VT. Please provide additional illustrations to clarify the Code required VT and proposed UT examination. | ||
: 2. Section E of RR-ENG-3-02 states that the | |||
: 3. What flaws are expected in these components? | |||
: 4. The illustration of the Roto-lok flange insert provided in RR-ENG-3-02 is not sufficient for understanding the Code-required examination surface as well as what is going to be examined with UT in lieu of VT. Please provide additional illustrations to clarify the Code required VT and proposed UT examination. | |||
: 5. How many Roto-Lok flange inserts are on each reactor vessel?}} | : 5. How many Roto-Lok flange inserts are on each reactor vessel?}} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:50, 14 January 2025
| ML103620556 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 12/28/2010 |
| From: | Thadani M Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Harrison A, Walker P South Texas |
| Thadani, M C, NRR/DORL/LP4, 415-1476 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML103620550 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC ME4764, TAC ME4765 | |
| Download: ML103620556 (1) | |
Text
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 3RD 10-YEAR INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST RR-ENG-3-02 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 STP NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY DOCKET NUMBERS 50-498 AND 50-499 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided by STP Nuclear Operating Company for South Texas Project Units 1 and 2, in its letter dated September 20, 2010, and has determined that additional information is necessary to complete the review of Relief Request RR-ENG-3-02. Based on the staff=s review, please address the following questions.
- 1. Please provide the start and end dates of the third 10-year inservice inspection interval for STP Units 1 and 2.
- 2. Section E of RR-ENG-3-02 states that the straight beam ultrasonic examination procedure has been demonstrated to ensure examination adequacy. Please provide a detailed description of this demonstration, including mockups/samples used, method(s) demonstrated, and results.
- 3. What flaws are expected in these components? Unless addressed in response to question 2 above, please address whether the mockups used in the demonstration of the UT technique contained flaws representative of those found inservice.
- 4. The illustration of the Roto-lok flange insert provided in RR-ENG-3-02 is not sufficient for understanding the Code-required examination surface as well as what is going to be examined with UT in lieu of VT. Please provide additional illustrations to clarify the Code required VT and proposed UT examination.
- 5. How many Roto-Lok flange inserts are on each reactor vessel?