IR 05000272/2011007: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: April 4, | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KlNG OF PRUSSlA. PA 19406-1415 April 4, 20lI Mr. Thomas Joyce President and Chief Nuclear Otficer PSEG Nuclear LLC - N09 P.O. Box 236 Hancock's Bridge, NJ 08038 | ||
SUBJECT: SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 .NRC COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | SUBJECT: SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 .NRC COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REPORT 0500027 2t20 1 1 007 AN D 0s00 03 1 I l 20 1 1 007 | ||
==Dear Mr. Joyce:== | ==Dear Mr. Joyce:== | ||
On February 18, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed | On February 18, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on February 18, 2011, with Mr. Edward Eilola, Plant Manager, and other members of your staff.The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.In conducting the inspection, the team examined the adequacy of selected components and operator actions to mitigate postulated transients, initiating events, and design basis accidents. | ||
Sincerely, | The inspection involved field walkdowns, examination of selected procedurei, calculations and records, and interviews with station personnel. | ||
This report documents three NRC-identified findings that were of very low safety significance (Green). These findings were determined to involve violations of NRC requirementi. | |||
However, because of the very low safety significance of the violations and because they were entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these findings as non-cited violations (NCV)consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. lf you contest any NCV in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region l; the Director, Otfice of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station. ln addition, if you disagree with the cross-cutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days oJ tne date of lhis inspeciion report, with the basis of your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region l, and ihe NRC Resident Inspector at Salem Nuclear Generating Station. ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for the public inspection in the NRC Public Docket Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely,v O/o,-**--Lawrence T. Doerflein, Chief Engineering Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos: 50-272;50-311 License Nos: DPR-70; DPR-75 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
===w/Attachment:=== | ===w/Attachment:=== | ||
Supplemental | Supplemental Information cc Mencl: Distribution via ListServ | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 18:06, 8 August 2018
| ML110940193 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 04/04/2011 |
| From: | Doerflein L T Engineering Region 1 Branch 2 |
| To: | Joyce T Public Service Enterprise Group |
| References | |
| IR-11-007 | |
| Download: ML110940193 (42) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KlNG OF PRUSSlA. PA 19406-1415 April 4, 20lI Mr. Thomas Joyce President and Chief Nuclear Otficer PSEG Nuclear LLC - N09 P.O. Box 236 Hancock's Bridge, NJ 08038
SUBJECT: SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 .NRC COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION REPORT 0500027 2t20 1 1 007 AN D 0s00 03 1 I l 20 1 1 007
Dear Mr. Joyce:
On February 18, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on February 18, 2011, with Mr. Edward Eilola, Plant Manager, and other members of your staff.The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.In conducting the inspection, the team examined the adequacy of selected components and operator actions to mitigate postulated transients, initiating events, and design basis accidents.
The inspection involved field walkdowns, examination of selected procedurei, calculations and records, and interviews with station personnel.
This report documents three NRC-identified findings that were of very low safety significance (Green). These findings were determined to involve violations of NRC requirementi.
However, because of the very low safety significance of the violations and because they were entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these findings as non-cited violations (NCV)consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. lf you contest any NCV in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region l; the Director, Otfice of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station. ln addition, if you disagree with the cross-cutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days oJ tne date of lhis inspeciion report, with the basis of your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region l, and ihe NRC Resident Inspector at Salem Nuclear Generating Station. ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for the public inspection in the NRC Public Docket Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,v O/o,-**--Lawrence T. Doerflein, Chief Engineering Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos: 50-272;50-311 License Nos: DPR-70; DPR-75
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 0500027212011007 and 0500031112011007
w/Attachment:
Supplemental Information cc Mencl: Distribution via ListServ