ML15077A535: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
. Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
| Line 53: | Line 51: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
. Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
| Line 76: | Line 72: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. | ||
. | Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | |||
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
| Line 102: | Line 96: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. | ||
. | Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | |||
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
| Line 122: | Line 114: | ||
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. | ||
. | Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | |||
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
| Line 151: | Line 141: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
. Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
| Line 178: | Line 166: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
. Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
| Line 203: | Line 189: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. | ||
. | Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | |||
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
| Line 229: | Line 213: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. | ||
. | Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | |||
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
| Line 249: | Line 231: | ||
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. | ||
. | Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | |||
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
| Line 273: | Line 253: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. | ||
. | Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | |||
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
| Line 295: | Line 273: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
. Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
| Line 316: | Line 292: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. | ||
. | Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief | |||
Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
| Line 345: | Line 319: | ||
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov | If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | ||
. Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and | |||
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 | ||
Revision as of 05:54, 9 July 2018
| ML15077A535 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah |
| Issue date: | 03/23/2015 |
| From: | Wrona D J Division of License Renewal |
| To: | Anoatubby B, Baker B J, Billie J E, Butler-Wolfe E, Harjo L M, Hicks M, Hobia J, Scott G, Sparkman R, Thomas R, Tiger G, Wallace G J, Wickliffe G G, Yargee T Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town, Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, Cherokee Nation, Chickasaw Nation, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, Kialegee Tribal Town, Muscogee (Creek) Nation, Seminole Nation of Oklahoma, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Shawnee Tribe, Thlopthlocco Tribal Town, United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma |
| Chazell R E | |
| References | |
| Download: ML15077A535 (16) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015 Mr. Bill John Baker, Principal Chief
Cherokee Nation
P.O. Box 948 Tahlequah, OK 74465-0948
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Principal Chief Baker:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated
cc w/encl: Listserv Dr. R. Allen, Policy Analyst UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015 Mr. Bill Anoatubby, Governor
The Chickasaw Nation
P.O. Box 1548 Ada, OK 74821-1548
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Governor Anoatubby:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated
cc w/encl: Listserv V. Nail, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015
Mr. Tarpie Yargee, Chief Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town
P.O. Box 187 Wetumka, OK 74883
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Chief Yargee:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015
Mr. George Tiger, Principal Chief
The Muscogee (Creek) Nation
P.O. Box 580 Okmulgee, OK 74447
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Principal Chief Tiger:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv E. Spain, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015
Ronnie Thomas, Chairman Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas 571 State Park Road 56 Livingston, TX 77351
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Chairman Thomas:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated
cc w/encl: Listserv UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015 Mr. George Scott, Town King
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town
P.O. Box 188
Okemah, OK 74859
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Mr. Scott:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated
cc w/encl: Listserv C. Coleman, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015 Ms. Glenna J. Wallace, Chief
Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma
P.O. Box 350
Seneca, MO 64865
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Chief Wallace:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated
cc w/encl: Listserv R. Dushane, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015
Mr. Jeremiah Hobia, Town King Kialegee Tribal Town
P.O. Box 332 Wetumka, OK 74833
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Mr. Hobia:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015
Mr. Michell Hicks, Principal Chief
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
P.O. Box 455 Cherokee, NC 28719
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Principal Chief Hicks:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv R. Townsend, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015
Ms. Edwina Butler-Wolfe, Governor Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 2025 South Gordon Cooper Drive Shawnee, OK 74801
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Governor Butler-Wolfe:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv J. Blanchard, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015 Mr. George G. Wickliffe, Chief
United Keetowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma
P.O. Box 746 Tahlequah, OK 74464
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Chief Wickliffe:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv L. LaRue, Acting Tribal Historic Preservation Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015 Mr. James E. Billie, Chairman Seminole Tribe of Florida 6300 Stirling Road
Hollywood, FL 33024
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Chairman Billie:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated
cc w/encl: Listserv P. Backhouse, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015 Mr. Leonard M. Harjo, Principal Chief Seminole Nation of Oklahoma P.O. Box 1498
Wewoka, OK 74884
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Principal Chief Harjo:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief
Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated
cc w/encl: Listserv UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 23, 2015 Mr. Ron Sparkman, Chief
Shawnee Tribe
P.O. Box 189
Miami, OK 74354
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Chief Sparkman:
Please find enclosed a copy of the final NUREG-1437, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2." The final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being issued as part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) process to decide whether to issue renewed operating licenses to Tennessee Valley Authority for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN). In the final SEIS, the NRC staff determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for SQN are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision-makers would be unreasonable. In the context of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NRC staff determined that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed action (license renewal). The final Environmental Impact Statement will accompany the final Safety Evaluation Report to be considered in the Commission's license renewal decision making process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Russell Chazell, Environmental Scientist, at 301-415-5003 or by e-mail at Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov. Sincerely, /RA/ David J. Wrona, Chief Environmental Review and
Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
As stated
cc w/encl: Listserv K. Jumper, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
ML15077A535 *concurrence via email OFFICE LA:DLR DLR:RPB2:PM RERB:Technical Staff Member BC: DLR:RERB NAME IBetts DDrucker RChazell DWrona DATE 3/19/15 3/19/15 3/20/15 3/20/15
Letter to B. Baker, et al, from D. Wrona dated
Identical letters have been sent to:
Principal Chief Bill John Baker, Cherokee Nation Governor Bill Anoatubby, The Chickasaw Nation Chief Tarpie Yargee, Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town Principal Chief George Tiger, The Muscogee (Creek) Nation Chairman Ronnie Thomas, Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas Town King George Scott, Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Chief Glenna J. Wallace, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Town King Jeremiah Hobia, Kialegee Tribal Town Principal Chief Michell Hicks, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Governor Edwina Butler-Wolfe, Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Chief George G. Wickliffe, United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma Chairman James E. Billie, Seminole Tribe of Florida Principal Chief Leonard M. Harjo, Seminole Tribe of Oklahoma
Chief Ron Sparkman, Shawnee Tribe
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
DISTRIBUTION
- PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsOpaMail RidsOgcMaiiCenter DDrucker RChazell