ML15349A841: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com> Tuesday , December 15 , 2015 8: 16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci , Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com | |||
Tom Gurdziel | [E x ternal_Sender] | ||
<tgurdziel | Indian Point 3 Good morning , I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine i f i t i s safe to continue to operate. And , in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally , for all U.S. nuclear plants. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www .avast.com 1 | ||
@twcny.rr.com> Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com | |||
[ | |||
Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine | |||
And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally | |||
, for all U.S. nuclear plants. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www .avast.com 1 | |||
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc: | CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com> Tuesday , December 15 , 2015 8: 16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci , Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com | |||
Tom Gurdziel | [E x ternal_Sender] | ||
<tgurdziel | Indian Point 3 Good morning , I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine i f i t i s safe to continue to operate. And , in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally , for all U.S. nuclear plants. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www .avast.com 1}} | ||
@twcny.rr.com> Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com | |||
[ | |||
Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine | |||
And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally | |||
, for all U.S. nuclear plants. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www .avast.com 1}} | |||
Revision as of 18:17, 8 July 2018
| ML15349A841 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/15/2015 |
| From: | Tom Gurdziel Public Commenter |
| To: | Burns S G NRC/Chairman |
| References | |
| LTR-15-0620 | |
| Download: ML15349A841 (1) | |
Text
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc:
Subject:
Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com> Tuesday , December 15 , 2015 8: 16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci , Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com
[E x ternal_Sender]
Indian Point 3 Good morning , I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine i f i t i s safe to continue to operate. And , in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally , for all U.S. nuclear plants. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www .avast.com 1
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc:
Subject:
Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com> Tuesday , December 15 , 2015 8: 16 AM CHAIRMAN Resource Screnci , Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com
[E x ternal_Sender]
Indian Point 3 Good morning , I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine i f i t i s safe to continue to operate. And , in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally , for all U.S. nuclear plants. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www .avast.com 1