ML16069A206: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:* ~United States Department of the Interior | {{#Wiki_filter:* ~United States Department of the Interior , FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632 | ||
,FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200~Charleston, South Carolina | |||
==Dear Ms. Sampson:== | ==Dear Ms. Sampson:== | ||
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding | The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina. | ||
Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973(ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction | Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity. | ||
Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action. | |||
Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. | If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632. | ||
As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation | Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC | ||
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 | * ~United States Department of the Interior , FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632 | ||
Sincerely, Thomas D. | |||
* ~United States Department of the Interior | |||
,FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200~Charleston, South Carolina | |||
==Dear Ms. Sampson:== | ==Dear Ms. Sampson:== | ||
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding | The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina. | ||
Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973(ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction | Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity. | ||
Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action. | |||
Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. | If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632. | ||
As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation | Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC}} | ||
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 | |||
Sincerely, Thomas D. | |||
Revision as of 13:37, 8 July 2018
| ML16069A206 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/2015 |
| From: | McCoy T D US Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service |
| To: | Michele Sampson NRC/EDO/AO |
| References | |
| FWS Log 2015-I-0632 | |
| Download: ML16069A206 (2) | |
Text
- ~United States Department of the Interior , FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632
Dear Ms. Sampson:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina.
Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity.
Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632.
Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC
- ~United States Department of the Interior , FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200~Charleston, South Carolina 29407 September 4,2015 Ms. Michele Sampson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-4B34 Washington, DC 20555 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Funding Plan, York County, South Carolina FWS Log No. 20 15-I-0632
Dear Ms. Sampson:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter regarding the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) located at the Catawba Nuclear Station in York County, South Carolina.
Pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting consultation regarding potential impacts implementation of the DFP may have upon federally protected species.Approval of the DFP will not authorize changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the 1SF SI, or result in the creation of any solid waste.Further, approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land-disturbing activity.
Any future NRC approval of site disturbing remediation activities requested or conducted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, would require additional environmental reviews. As such, the NRC has determined that the proposed implementation of the DFP is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Upon review of the information submitted the Service concurs with your determination that this event is not likely to adversely affect federally protected threatened or endangered species.Please note that obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action may affect any listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner, which was not considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by the identified action.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark Caldwell at (843) 727-4707, ext. 215 and reference FWS Log No. 20 15-1-0632.
Sincerely, Thomas D. McCoy Field Supervisor TDM/MAC